ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Editorial
Revised

The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research

[version 2; peer review: not peer reviewed]
PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2016
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
NOT PEER REVIEWED

This article is included in the Bioconductor gateway.

Abstract

Bioconductor (bioconductor.org) is a rich source of software and know-how for the integrative analysis of genomic data. The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research provides a forum for task-oriented workflows that cover a solution to a current, important problem in genome-scale data analysis. It also hosts manuscripts describing software packages, package-based vignettes, teaching labs, benchmark studies, methodological reviews and bioinformatics software oriented perspective papers.

Keywords

Bioconductor, bioinformatics, genomics, systems biology, R, statistical computing

Revised Amendments from Version 1

This Editorial has been updated to reflect the expanded scope of the Bioconductor channel, which now goes beyond cross-package workflows to include: package-based vignettes that help solve biological questions, teaching labs, benchmark studies, methodological reviews and perspectives relating to bioinformatics software

Editorial

Bioinformatics is a wonderful field, since so many of the researchers who develop new concepts, methods and tools have embraced the sharing of their research outputs as free, open-source software. This openness has, no doubt, accelerated the breathtaking progress in the field of genomics (and related `omic technologies). Bioconductor (bioconductor.org) has become a place that many developers are choosing to host their software - it gives them a useful infrastructure for development and for providing effective user support1. It is also a venue where many prospective users go to when they look for a quality solution in genome-scale data analysis, where they will find some of the most advanced tools.

This abundance of tools, however, can be difficult to navigate. Bioconductor comes in two parts: as a collection of individual packages, each developed independently by a research group somewhere on the globe, and often among the experts in their field; and as a layer of infrastructure, with common data structures and core library functionality to glue the packages together and provide, as we call it, ‘interoperability’.

The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research hosts task-oriented workflows. Each workflow covers a solution to a current, important problem in genome-scale data analysis from end to end. Often it will invoke resources from several packages; combine multiple data types and demonstrate integrative analysis and modelling techniques. We explicitly welcome workflows that are written by authors that not the developers of any of the used packages.

Of course we also welcome package descriptions and package-based vignettes by package authors that show how their package(s) can be employed to solve a scientific question, either by itself or in conjunction with other Bioconductor packages.

The channel also welcomes bioinformatics teaching labs, benchmark studies, methodological reviews and bioinformatics software oriented perspective papers.

We encourage the use of Rmarkdown and knitr (or similar facilities) for authoring papers in this channel. By integrating concrete software examples with textual motivation and explanation this lets the papers be alive.

We are excited about the rapid and transparent publication process of F1000Research and look forward to community contributions.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2015
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Huber W, Carey VJ, Davis S et al. The Bioconductor channel in F1000Research [version 2; peer review: not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2016, 4:217 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6758.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
NOT PEER REVIEWED
NOT PEER REVIEWED

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2015
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.