ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Termination of mid-trimester pregnancies: misoprostol versus concurrent weighted Foley catheter and misoprostol

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 25 Oct 2012
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the use of a weighted trans-cervical fluid-filled Foley’s catheter would improve the effectiveness of 400µg vaginal misoprostol regimen in terminating mid-trimester pregnancies.
Methods: This study was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Menofyia University Hospital in Egypt. Fifty eligible primigravidae were allocated into 2 groups. Termination was carried out in group I using vaginal misoprostol while in group II, a weighted fluid-filled intra-uterine Foley’s catheter was inserted and a similar misoprostol regimen was followed as in group I.
Results:The combined group showed shorter induction to termination interval (15.6 ± 4.9 versus 21.9 ± 5.4 hours; P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of side effects between the groups.
Conclusion: A combination of a weighted Foley’s catheter and 400µg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours is more effective than misoprostol alone in terminating mid-trimester gestations.

Keywords

Misoprostol, mid-trimester termination, Foley catheter

Introduction

Universal prenatal screening programs have led to an increase in the diagnosis of congenital malformations with subsequent gradual increase in second trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP)1. This represents 10–15% of total abortions performed worldwide2.

Termination in the second trimester is more risky than during the first trimester3 and, therefore, the pharmacologic management seems to be an appealing alternative to surgical evacuation. Misoprostol has been widely used in different dosages and routes for second-trimester pregnancy terminations. Doses ranging from 200 to 800 µg at intervals ranging from 3 to 12 hours have been described48. High doses at short intervals have been linked to a higher percentage of side effects.

Several studies have described the Foley’s catheter as an effective method in ripening the cervix. Obed and Adewole9 showed that the Foley’s catheter increased the Bishop’s score in women with unripe cervices. Sciscione et al.10 stated that the Foley’s catheter appears to be of comparable effectiveness as to intravaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening. Its use is common in poor countries because it is safe, inexpensive and has a low incidence of contractile abnormalities11.

This study was designed to investigate whether the insertion of a weighted fluid-filled trans-cervical Foley’s catheter would further improve the effectiveness of 400 µg vaginal misoprostol in terminating mid-trimester pregnancies.

Material and methods

This study was carried out at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Menofyia University Hospital, Egypt. Women were recruited and enrolled in the study from July 2011 until the end of April 2012. The institutional review board approved the protocol of the study and an informed consent was obtained from all participants. (see Supplementary Material).

Women enrolled were primigravidae with a singleton pregnancy at a gestational age ranging between 13 and 23 weeks, with a fetal anomaly that is incompatible with life or a fetal demise within one week. Gestational age was calculated from the date of the first day of last menstrual period and confirmed by a vaginal ultrasound scan. Women with any of the following were excluded from the study: 1) Previous uterine scar; 2) Contraindication to misoprostol; 3) Low-lying placenta; 4) Operation on the cervix; 5) Clinical or laboratory evidence of chorioamnionitis.

Initially we planned to recruit 50 women divided equally between two groups. However, after starting enrollment, we were confronted with the fact that many women preferred to be enrolled in the combined group rather than the misoprostol-only group. When patient number 50 was enrolled, there were 20 women assigned to group I and 30 women to group II.

All participants were subjected to complete history taking and thorough clinical examination. Induction of abortion was carried out in group I by inserting two tablets; each contains 200 microgram misoprostol (Sigma Pharmaceuticals, Egypt), in the posterior vaginal fornix every four hours. In group II, with the patient in the lithotomy position, the cervix was visualized using a Cusco’s speculum and then sterilized with povidone iodine. The anterior lip of the cervix was grasped with a ring forceps and another ring forceps was then used to push the catheter through the cervix under direct visualization. The balloon was then inflated with 30 ml saline (50 ml for those >20 weeks) and the catheter was pulled back snugly against the internal os and taped to the inner aspect of the thigh. A bag filled with saline was applied to the distal end of the catheter to provide moderate traction. Different filling volumes were used at different gestational ages. We used 250 ml at 13–17 weeks, 300 ml with ages at 18–20 weeks and 500 ml at gestational ages more than 20 weeks. The filled bag was approximately equivalent to 250, 300 and 500 g in weight, respectively. A 400 µg misoprostol vaginal dose “two tablets” was then inserted in the posterior vaginal fornix/4 hours as in group I. A maximum of 4 misoprostol doses were used in both groups. Each patient received 1 g ampicillin/6 hours as a prophylactic antibiotic. As soon as the catheter was expelled, re-assessment of the dilatation and effacement of the cervix was carried out. Oxytocin infusion was started 4 hours after the last dose of misoprostol in both groups according to the standard protocol in our department.

The patient was assessed every 4 hours for vital signs, cervical dilatation, expulsion of fetus and occurrence of complications such as nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. All patients received intravenous oxytocin 20 IU after expulsion of the fetus to help placental separation and delivery. Retained placenta was considered if no manifestations for placental separation appeared 30 minutes after fetal expulsion. The patient was anesthetized and manual separation of the placenta was carried out. Surgical evacuation was performed if any remnant of conception such as missed placental lobe or piece of membranes was suspected to be retained inside the uterus.

After placental expulsion, women were observed for the presence of uterine atony and post-abortive bleeding. This was assessed by counting the number and change in the weight of the sanitary pads used by the patient. Bleeding was considered average if less than 200 cc and excessive if more than 200 cc.

The measured primary outcome parameter was the induction to abortion interval. Secondary parameters were: 1) Occurrence of side effects; 2) Need for manual separation of the placenta; 3) The need for surgical evacuation; and 4) Occurrence of post-abortive bleeding.

For the purpose of statistical analysis, women enrolled were categorized into 3 groups according to gestational age (Table 1). Early mid-trimester group between 13 and 17 weeks, mid mid-trimester group 18–20 weeks, and late mid-trimester group 21–23 weeks.

Table 1. The three categories of patients in the misoprostol group and the combined group according to gestational age.

Gestational ageMisoprostol
group (n=20)
Combined
group (n=30)
P
13–17 weeks7 (35%)11 (36.7%)>0.05
18–20 weeks7 (35%)9 (30%)>0.05
21–23 weeks6 (30%)10 (33.3%)>0.05

Results were tabulated and analyzed on an IBM personal computer using Epi Info, version 6, a word-processing database and statistics program. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean and standard deviation. The Student t test was used to evaluate independent variables that are normally distributed. The Chi square test was used to compare 2 rates unless the number in the contingency table was < 6 where Fisher’s exact test was used. A significant statistical level was considered if P was < 0.05.

Results

The age of the participants was not significantly different between both groups (27.93 ± 6.48 years in group I versus 27.19 ± 5.23 years in group II; P > 0.05) There was no significant difference in gestational age at enrollment (18.0 ± 2.41weeks in group I versus 17.9 ± 2.88 weeks in group II; P > 0.05). Women enrolled in the study were categorized into 3 categories as shown in Table 1.

In the present study, the combined group showed shorter induction to abortion interval at all gestational ages compared to the misoprostol only group. However; this duration increased with increasing gestational age. The mean cumulative evacuation time was 15.6 ± 4.9 hours in the combined group versus 21.9 ± 5.4 hours in the misoprostol-only group (P < 0.01). The evacuation times for different gestational ages is shown in Table 2. In the combined group, 94% of cases (28/30) showed complete evacuation in less than 24 hours from the start of induction compared to only 55% (11/20) in the misoprostol group. At a gestational age of 21–23 weeks, 80% of women had aborted before 24 hours in the combined group but none in the misoprostol group. At a gestational age between 18 and 21 weeks, expulsion of fetus occurred in 100% and 57.1% in the combined and misoprostol groups, respectively. Rates of fetal expulsion were 100% in both groups at a gestational age between 13 and 17 weeks (Table 2).

Table 2. The primary outcome parameter in the misoprostol group and the combined group according to gestational age.

Gestational ageMisoprostol
group
Combined
group
P
13–17 weeks (n=7)(n=11)
Induction to abortion
interval
14.6 ± 2.6710.8 ± 3.91<0.05
Expulsion of fetus
-At 4 hours0/70/11
-At 8 hours0/75/11>0.05
-At 12 hours2/710/11<0.05
-At 16 hours5/711/11>0.05
-At 20 hours7/711/11
-At 24 hours0/70/11
-At > 24 hours00
18–20 weeks (n=7)(n=9)
Induction to abortion
interval
22.3 ± 3.7616.7 ± 3.21<0.01
Expulsion of fetus
-At 4 hours0/70/9
-At 8 hours0/73/9>0.05
-At 12 hours0/74/9>0.05
-At 16 hours1/77/9<0.05
-At 20 hours2/78/9>0.05
-At 24 hours4/79/9>0.05
-At > 24 hours3/70/9>0.05
21–23 weeks (n=6)(n=10)
Induction to abortion
interval
26.15 ± 4.3019.6 ± 4.11<0.01
Expulsion of fetus
-At 4 hours0/60/10
-At 8 hours0/62/10>0.05
-At 12 hours0/66/10>0.05
-At 16 hours0/66/10>0.05
-At 20 hours0/67/10<0.05
-At 24 hours0/68/10<0.01
-At > 24 hours6/62/10<0.01

Table 3 shows that the secondary outcome parameters are not statistically different between both groups. Table 4 reports the side effects in both groups.

Table 3. The secondary outcome parameters in the misoprostol group and the combined group according to gestational age.

Gestational ageMisoprostol
group
Combined
group
P
13–17 weeks (n=7)(n=11)
Manual separation of
placenta
00
Surgical evacuation3/72/11>0.05
Blood loss (<200 ml)6/710/11>0.05
Blood loss (>200 ml)1/71/11>0.05
18–20 weeks (n=7)(n=9)
Manual separation of
placenta
2/71/9>0.05
Surgical evacuation1/71/9>0.0
Blood loss (<200 ml)6/77/9>0.05
Blood loss (>200 ml)1/72/9>0.05
21–23 weeks (n=6)(n=10)
Manual separation of
placenta
3/62/10>0.05
Surgical evacuation00
Blood loss (<200 ml)4/67/10>0.05
Blood loss (>200 ml)2/63/10>0.05

Table 4. Side effects in the misoprostol group and the combined group.

Gestational ageMisoprostol
group
Combined
group
P
13–17 weeks (n=7)(n=11)
Nausea2/74/11>0.05
Vomiting2/74/11>0.05
Abdominal pain1/74/11>0.05
18–20 weeks (n=7)(n=9)
Nausea2/72/9>0.05
Vomiting2/72/9>0.05
Abdominal pain2/74/9>0.05
21–23 weeks (n=6)(n=10)
Nausea3/64/10>0.05
Vomiting3/64/10>0.05
Abdominal pain3/66/10>0.05

Discussion

This study showed that the combination of weighted Foley’s catheter and misoprostol resulted in a significantly shorter induction to abortion interval compared to misoprostol alone. Because we used the same misoprostol dose in both groups, this decrease in duration was attributed to the use of weighted Foley’s catheter with moderate traction applied over its distal end. Early studies comparing the Foley catheter with PGE2 tablets found no difference in the termination time between both methods12,13. No traction was applied in either of these studies. Bani-Irshaid et al.14 compared the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter (with and without traction) and prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets in terminating second- and early third-trimester pregnancies in 258 women. They concluded that the efficacy of the Foley’s catheter can be enhanced with the use of traction to give similar results to prostaglandin E2. No studies have compared the use of prostaglandin E1 vaginal tablets alone versus its combined use with weighted Foley’s catheter in terminating mid-trimester gestations. The catheter exerts its effect by disrupting the integrity of amnion-chorion and myometrium in addition to cervical collagen increasing prostaglandin and cytokine release, rendering the uterus susceptible1517.

The induction to delivery interval increased with increasing gestational age in both groups. We also had rates of fetal expulsion of 100% in both groups at a gestational age between 13 and 17 weeks, which decreased with advancement of gestational age. This is in agreement with other investigators’ findings. Gómez et al. in 200918 found that the mean induction-to-abortion interval increases by 4 hours after 20 weeks gestation. Ashok et al. (2003)19 in another study on mid-trimester medical termination of pregnancy concluded that the induction-to-abortion interval was significantly longer in the higher gestational age pregnancies. Similar findings were reported by Dilbaz et al.20 in pregnancies between 13 and 20 weeks. We used a misoprostol dose of 400 µg administered every 4 hours. Doses of 600 and 800 µg have shown comparable successful abortion rates, but were associated with high rates of side effects21,22. Wong and colleagues6 compared the efficacy and side effects of 400 µg misoprostol administered every 3 and every 6 hours. They concluded that the three-hour regime was more effective in terms of a significantly shorter drug administration-to-abortion interval at the expense of more side effects. We had no significant difference in the incidence of side effects between both groups. Side effects are less common with the vaginal route compared to other routes of administration23.

In the present study, there was no significant difference in the need for post-abortive manual separation of the placenta. Surgical evacuation should only be considered if there is clinical evidence that the abortion is incomplete24. In the current study, an incidence of 20% was reported in the misoprostol group while only 10% required surgical evacuation in the combined group. Ashok et al. 200319 studied mid-trimester medical termination of pregnancy using misoprostol and concluded that surgical evacuation of the uterus under general anesthesia was required to complete the abortion in 8.1% of women. In 2005, a report from the Scottish group estimated the rate of surgical evacuation as low as 2.5%25. The high incidence of surgical evacuation in this study may reflect the inadequate experience of dealing with second-trimester abortions. Cases of induced abortion in our society are rare because they are considered illegal unless performed to save a maternal life. Our findings showed that the majority of cases who required surgical evacuation in both groups were between 13 and 17 weeks5,7. This is in agreement with the results of other investigators26. It is probably wise to inform women undergoing pregnancy termination early in the second trimester of a possible higher chance of incomplete abortion. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of blood loss between both groups.

To conclude, the use of a weighted trans-cervical Foley’s catheter filled with 30 ml saline improved the effectiveness of 400 µg vaginal misoprostol in terminating mid-trimester pregnancies, as reflected by a shorter induction-to-delivery interval with no significant increase in the incidence of side effects.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 25 Oct 2012
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Shabana A, Salah H, Kandil M et al. Termination of mid-trimester pregnancies: misoprostol versus concurrent weighted Foley catheter and misoprostol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:36 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.1-36.v1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 25 Oct 2012
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Nov 2012
Nathan S. Fox, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 19
This is an interesting study examining the additional benefit of transcervical Foley in second trimester termination of pregnancy with misoprostol. Overall, this study is valuable, but I have a few reservations regarding their methodology.

1. The authors should explain why this
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Fox NS. Reviewer Report For: Termination of mid-trimester pregnancies: misoprostol versus concurrent weighted Foley catheter and misoprostol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:36 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.207.r334)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
19
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Nov 2012
Vikram Talaulikar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George's University of London, London, UK 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 19
It is an interesting study adding to the emerging recent evidence on the efficacy of balloon catheters for cervical ripening and induction of labour. However, the above issues need to be addressed in order for the conclusions to be valid:

1.
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Talaulikar V. Reviewer Report For: Termination of mid-trimester pregnancies: misoprostol versus concurrent weighted Foley catheter and misoprostol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:36 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.207.r333)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
23
Cite
Reviewer Report 02 Nov 2012
Nathalie Kapp, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva 27, CH, Switzerland 
Not Approved
VIEWS 23
The statistical analysis used by the authors is inappropriate as they did multiple testing, and the primary outcome needs a time-to-event analysis (like a survival analysis).

As women chose their treatment group, the conclusions cannot be stated as one may about
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Kapp N. Reviewer Report For: Termination of mid-trimester pregnancies: misoprostol versus concurrent weighted Foley catheter and misoprostol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2012, 1:36 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.207.r332)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 25 Oct 2012
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.