New onset asthma during&nbsp;pregnancy:&nbsp;two case reports

Paula S. Schriek; Saar A. Bendien; Hanneke A. Feitsma; Jeroen van Exsel

doi:10.12688/f1000research.73188.1

Home Browse New onset asthma duringpregnancy:two case reports

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Clinical Practice Article

New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

Paula S. Schriek ¹, Saar A. Bendien¹, Hanneke A. Feitsma², Jeroen van Exsel¹

PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Respiratory Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, South Holland, 2545AA, The Netherlands
² Department of gynaecology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, South Holland, 2545AA, The Netherlands

Paula S. Schriek
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Saar A. Bendien
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Hanneke A. Feitsma
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Jeroen van Exsel
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Introduction:
Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease during pregnancy. However, reports of new onset asthma during pregnancy are lacking. We report two cases of new onset asthma during pregnancy following respiratory tract infection, subsequently one case with M. pneumoniae infection and the other case with a combined infection with respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus.
Case presentation:
Both patients presented with the clinical features of an acute asthma exacerbation during pregnancy without a medical history of asthma. During follow up the diagnosis of asthma was supported by spirometry showing significant reversibility and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Patients were hospitalized and received supplemental oxygen, treatment for an acute asthma exacerbation with systemic corticosteroids, high dose inhalation therapy. These therapeutic interventions subsequently led to a good outcome for the mother and newborn in both cases.
Conclusions:
New onset asthma should be part of the differential diagnosis in pregnant patients with respiratory symptoms, particularly in case of mycoplasma infection.
Diagnosing asthma during pregnancy can be challenging. In these circumstances, additional diagnostic tests (like inflammatory biomarkers FeNO and blood eosinophils) can be helpful to support the diagnosis.

Keywords

asthma, pregnancy, infection, exacerbation

Corresponding author: Paula S. Schriek

Competing interests: S.A. Bendien has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Teva and Sanofi. J. Van Exsel has received fees for speaking at symposia from Novartis, GSK, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, ALK and Chiesi.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2021 Schriek PS et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Schriek PS, Bendien SA, Feitsma HA and van Exsel J. New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:1120 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.1) First published: 08 Nov 2021, 10:1120 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.1) Latest published: 01 Mar 2023, 10:1120 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.2)

Abbreviations

b.i.d., twice a day; body mass index, BMI; coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19; C-Reactive Protein test, CRP; Estimated fetal weight, EFW; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; FENO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; gestational age, GA; immunoglobulin M, IgM; inhaled corticosteroid, ICS; OCS, oral corticosteroids; respiratory syncytial virus, RSV; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases during pregnancy with a prevalence of 7–10%. Dyspnoea is a frequent symptom, being present in 60–70% of healthy pregnancies, mainly as a result of normal physiological changes (Table 1)¹. When a patient presents with dyspnoea during pregnancy it can be challenging to distinguish dyspnoea related to physiological changes (such as decrease in functional residual capacity and pregnancy-induced hyperventilation (Table 1.)) from pathology, such as uncontrolled asthma. This can be particularly difficult in patients without a medical history of asthma. Reports of new onset asthma during pregnancy are lacking. Uncontrolled asthma and asthma exacerbations during pregnancy are associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes for mother and child such as preterm birth, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia^2,3. Viral respiratory infections are the most common trigger for asthma exacerbations. M. pneumoniae infection is also known to play a role in asthma, resulting in exacerbations, and possibly related to the pathogenesis of asthma^4,5. It is thought that pregnant women are more susceptible to infections or that they are more severely affected by infectious diseases^6,7. In this report, we describe two patients with de novo diagnosis of asthma during pregnancy following respiratory tract infection.

Table 1. Differential diagnosis of dyspnoea during pregnancy.

Pathological

Pulmonary embolism

Pneumonia

(new onset) Asthma

Pre- eclampsia with pulmonary oedema

Peripartum cardiomyopathy

Dysfunctional breathing

Pneumothorax

Amniotic fluid embolism

Physiological (changes during pregnancy)

Pregnancy related hyperventilation

Decreased functional residual capacity (FRC)

Decreased expiratory reserve volume (ERV)

Anaemia

Case reports

Case one

A healthy 33-year-old Caucasian woman presented to the emergency department with progressive dyspnoea in her third trimester of pregnancy, at 32 weeks gestation. The general practitioner treated her with clarithromycin, salbutamol aerosol 100 μg/do and oral corticosteroids (OCS) (prednisone 30mg) and beclomethasone 100 μg/do metered-dose inhaler twice daily (b.i.d.). Despite this therapy, her clinical condition deteriorated with progressive work of breathing and cough.

Her medical history consisted of scoliosis and one episode of possible pneumonia, treated by her primary care physician with antibiotics. Independent of this event, she never experienced respiratory symptoms. She had no family history of asthma and no personal history of atopy. She stopped smoking 5 years previously. Her body mass index (BMI) was 24 mg/m². She was employed as a teacher.

At presentation, the patient was in moderate respiratory distress. Vital signs showed an oxygen saturation of 98% on room air and blood pressure of 130/70mmHg.

Lung auscultation revealed an expiratory wheeze with scattered rhonchi. The physical examination and chest radiograph showed no abnormalities. The white-blood-cell count was 16.3×10⁹/L, with neutrophils of 15.3×10⁹/L, and eosinophils of 0.05 ×10⁹/L. C-Reactive Protein test (CRP) was low (4 mg/L). Arterial blood gas analysis showed respiratory alkalosis with pH 7.46, pCO₂ 3.6 kPa, HCO₃ ⁻ 21 mmol/L, pO₂ 11.6kPA, with an elevated A-a gradient of 3.9 kPa.

Sputum cultures showed upper respiratory tract flora. Serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody titer was 16 for M. pneumoniae, which is indicative of current infection. Allergy testing with Phadiatop test was negative (Total serum IgE: 33 IU/ml).

The patient was admitted to the hospital due to respiratory distress and treated with prednisone 30mg/day for 10 days, clarithromycin was increased to 500 mg b.i.d. in combination with salbutamol/ipratropium 1/0.2 mg/ml inhalation solution every four hours. The beclomethasone inhaler was converted to a high dose inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) (beclomethasone/formoterol aerosol 200/6 µg, two inhalations b.i.d.). Throughout the course of the week, the patient remained tachypnoeic, oxygen dependent and frequent nebulizing was needed. After a week, her symptoms improved and OCS was systematically tapered. Daily cardiotocography and biweekly fetal growth ultrasound were normal, with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of p57 and normal amniotic fluid. The patient was discharged after a hospital stay of 15 days.

Follow-up and outcomes

Two weeks after discharge, and discontinuation of OCS, spirometry revealed FVC 3.37L (84%), FEV1 2.75L (82%) pre bronchodilator (pre-BD), FEV1 3.12L (93%) post bronchodilator (post-BD). Spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility (13% and 262 cc) which is compatible with asthma. Furthermore, strongly elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (60ppb) and elevated blood eosinophils levels (0.50×10⁹/L) were found. Due to persistent eosinophilic inflammation, treatment with ICS was intensified. FeNO normalized after 8 weeks (18ppb). The outcomes after pregnancy were remarkably good for the patient and newborn. No maternal complications during labor or late term pregnancy occurred. The patient gave birth to a healthy baby boy at a GA of 39 weeks and three days, with a birthweight of 3445 grams. The baby had an uncomplicated neonatal course. Over a period of 6 months, inhalation medication could be reduced to ICS only and the patient was referred back to primary care.

Case two

A 22-year-old Turkish woman, with morbid obesity (BMI of 46) and no further medical history, presented to the emergency department with dyspnoea and a productive cough in her first trimester of pregnancy, at 8 weeks gestation. She developed a cold with nasal congestion, a productive cough and progressive dyspnoea. There was no family history of asthma and she had never smoked. She was employed as a housekeeper.

At presentation, vital signs showed a respiratory rate of 23 breaths/minute, oxygen saturation of 92% on room air and blood pressure of 135/85. Lung auscultation revealed an extended expirium with scattered rhonchi. The chest radiograph showed no signs of pneumonia. The white-blood-cell count was 12.6×10⁹/L, with neutrophils of 10.0×10⁹/L and eosinophils of 0.28×10⁹/L. CRP was elevated; 76 mg/L. Arterial blood gas analysis showed hypoxemia and respiratory alkalosis with pH 7.44, pCO₂ 4.0 kPa, HCO₃ 22 mmol/L, pO₂ 8.4 kPa, with an elevated A-a gradient of 6.6 kPa.

The patient was admitted to the hospital. Treatment was started with prednisone 30 mg/day, clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. in combination with salbutamol/ipratropium 1/0.2 mg/ml nebulizer and inhaled oxygen. High dose beclomethasone/formoterol aerosol 200/6 µg was started with two inhalations b.i.d. Polymerase chain reaction on throat swab was positive for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rhinovirus. Phadiatop test was positive with increased IgE for dog rose, house dust mite, timothy grass and birch pollen (total serum IgE level 1632 /IU/ml).

Spirometry during hospitalization revealed FEV1 2.47L (78%) and FEV1/FVC (84.31%), Z-score of -0.68. The patient gradually recovered, and antibiotics, prednisone and salbutamol/ipratropium inhalation were discontinued after three days. The patient was discharged after six days.

One month after discharge she returned to our emergency department with complaints of a common cold with a sore throat, a productive cough and dyspnoea. At presentation, the patient was not clinically in distress and there was no hypoxemia. Treatment was started with prednisone 30 mg/day for seven days and the patient was discharged. Spirometry performed in the outpatient setting revealed FEV1 1.81L (57%) pre-BD, FEV1 2.07L (66%) post-BD, FEV1/FVC (70.29%, Z-score: -2.53). Spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility (15% and 260 cc) which supports the diagnosis of asthma. Furthermore, FeNO was strongly elevated (58ppb). At 20 weeks gestational age (GA), spirometry revealed FEV1 3.25L (103%) and FEV1/FVC (86.44%, Z-score: -0.32), demonstrating significant variability over time.

The patient developed gestational diabetes mellitus in the third trimester. Monthly growth ultrasound showed normal fetal growth (EFW p72), normal abdominal circumference (fetal abdominal circumference p44) and normal amniotic fluid.

Follow-up and outcomes

At 28 weeks, the patient presented to our emergency department again with dyspnoea and a non-productive cough. She was clinically stable with an adequate oxygen saturation of 97%. The blood eosinophil count was 0.36×10⁹/L. with a CRP of 23 mg/L. Newly diagnosed was an iron deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin: 5.6 mmol/L) which recovered after ferricarboxymaltose 1000mg (haemoglobin afterwards 7.6mmol/L). She was admitted to the hospital and treated with prednisone 30 mg/day for five days and salbutamol/ipratropium 1/0.2 mg/ml inhalation. Both sputum cultures and serum IgM for M. pneumoniae were

During admission, daily fetal assessment was performed, ultrasound scan of fetal growth was normal. The patient was discharged after seven days. the pregnancy outcomes of the patient were normal. She gave (uncomplicated vaginal) birth to a healthy baby girl at a GA of 41+4 with a birthweight of 3805 grams. The apgar score was 9-10-10 after 1,5 and 10 minutes.

In the outpatient setting the patient received two more follow-ups from the respiratory physician and the specialized respiratory nurse. During these consultations no more asthma exacerbations were reported but unfortunately the patient’s adherence to medication seemed poor. After these consultations the patient was lost to follow up in secondary care. Further monitoring of asthma will be performed by primary care.

Discussion

New onset asthma during pregnancy may not always be recognized but might be rather common. Based on pulmonary function testing, inflammatory biomarkers and clinical response to treatment, our patients are strongly suspected to have new onset asthma triggered by infection during pregnancy. To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous case reports about new onset asthma during pregnancy following mycoplasma infection. Both patients presented with severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization, oxygen supplementation and treatment with OCS and antibiotics. These interventions subsequently led to a good outcome for the mother and newborn in both cases. This illustrates the importance of active treatment of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.

The diagnosis of asthma during pregnancy can be challenging as bronchoprovocation testing with metacholine or histamine is contra indicated during pregnancy⁸. Healthy pregnant women show no change in FEV1 and FVC during (late) pregnancy. So, in patients suspected of new onset asthma during pregnancy, and normal spirometry, repeating spirometry when the patient is having more symptoms (as in case 2) to demonstrate significant variability or additional inflammatory biomarkers (as in case 1) can support the diagnosis. This is important since over- as well as under-treatment should be avoided in pregnant patients with asthma.

In non-pregnant women an exacerbation, which can be triggered by viral infections, may be the presenting manifestation of asthma. Mycoplasma infection resulting in new onset, infection- mediated, asthma, outside pregnancy, is also well recognized⁴. These two phenomena are not as well described in pregnancy. Current literature suggests that M. pneumoniae is an important trigger for acute exacerbations of asthma, accounting for 3.3–50% of all exacerbations. However, the role of M. pneumonia infection in the pathogenesis of asthma is still controversial^5,9. In 1994, Yano et al., reported a case of mycoplasma infection leading to a first presentation of asthma, suggesting the infection led to a complex interplay of airway inflammation and IgE mediated hypersensitivity (type 1 reaction as seen in asthma)¹⁰. Recent studies also show that M. Pneumoniae infection in non-pregnant women and children can contribute to the development of asthma and prevalence of asthma is increased in patients with a history of atypical pneumonia^1,4,5,11. Although these findings are suggestive of an association between M. pneumoniae and asthma disease onset and exacerbations, larger well controlled studies are needed to test this hypothesis and identify underlying mechanisms.

The role of other viral respiratory tract infections, especially RSV or rhinovirus, in the development of asthma is also a subject of interest. Certain components seem to contribute to the risk of developing asthma, such as type and severity of viral infections and host characteristics¹². It is well known that pregnant women are more susceptible to viral infections and that they are more at risk for developing severe diseases. For pregnant women with asthma this risk is even higher¹³

Pregnancy is a pro-inflammatory and immune modulating condition, depending on the stage of pregnancy^6,7,14,15. Theoretical, physiological immunosuppression is a characteristic of pregnancy and results in feto-maternal tolerance, although this is a complex interacting network and not yet fully understood. Changes in immune characteristics during pregnancy including a shift in (Th1)/Th2 ratio toward a Th2- predominant immune state and an increase in regulatory T cells (Tregs) may explain increased susceptibility to infections^16,17. These alterations in immune function possibly also have a role in triggering the process of developing new onset asthma during pregnancy.

The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic that caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulted in many deaths worldwide. Recent studies suggest that pregnancy is associated with increased risk for severe illness due to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pregnant patients with COVID-19 are more likely to need intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation and there is an increased risk for preterm birth^18–20. The ongoing discussion whether or not asthma should be considered a risk factor for severe COVID-19 is not yet closed²¹. Nevertheless, despite critical gaps in our current knowledge, pregnant patients with asthma and COVID-19 should be managed by a multidisciplinary approach to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes²². Moreover, offering vaccination with one of the two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines to all pregnant and breastfeeding women is recently recommended²³.

A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

In summary, new onset asthma should be part of the differential diagnosis of pregnant patients with respiratory symptoms, especially when mycoplasma infection is found. Uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy triggered by infection is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in mother and child. This should alert clinicians to seriously evaluate dyspnoea during pregnancy by physical examination, repetitive spirometry and inflammatory biomarkers such as FeNO and blood eosinophils.

More studies are needed to determine the relation between respiratory tract infections and new onset asthma during pregnancy.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of the patients’ clinical details was obtained from both patients.

This research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Bidad K, Heidarnazhad H, Pourpak Z, et al.: Frequency of asthma as the cause of dyspnea in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 111(2): 140–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Abdullah K, Zhu J, Gershon A, et al.: Effect of asthma exacerbation during pregnancy in women with asthma: a population-based cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020; 55(2): 1901335. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Baghlaf H, Spence AR, Czuzoj-Shulman N, et al.: Pregnancy outcomes among women with asthma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32(8): 1325–1331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Yeh JJ, Wang YC, Hsu WH, et al.: Incident asthma and Mycoplasma pneumoniae: A nationwide cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 137(4): 1017–1023.e6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Sutherland ER, Martin RJ: Asthma and atypical bacterial infection. Chest. 2007; 132(6): 1962–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
6. Racicot K, Kwon JY, Aldo P, et al.: Understanding the complexity of the immune system during pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014; 72(2): 107–16. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
7. Mor G, Aldo P, Alvero AB: The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017; 17(8): 469–482. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Global initiative for asthma: Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2019; [cited 2020]. Reference Source
9. Nisar N, Guleria R, Kumar S, et al.: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role in asthma. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(976): 100–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
10. Yano T, Ichikawa Y, Komatu S, et al.: Association of Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigen with initial onset of bronchial asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 149(5): 1348–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Biscardi S, Lorrot M, Marc E, et al.: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and asthma in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(10): 1341–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Saglani S: Viral infections and the development of asthma in children. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013; 1(4): 139–50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
13. Vieira AC, Pite H, Morais-Almeida M: Asthma and pregnancy in the 2020 decade: still a matter of concern. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 1–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
14. Hadfield KA, McCracken SA, Ashton AW, et al.: Regulated suppression of NF-κB throughout pregnancy maintains a favourable cytokine environment necessary for pregnancy success. J Reprod Immunol. 2011; 89(1): 1–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
15. Mor G, Abrahams V: Immunology of implantation. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. In: Arici A, editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2002; 22(3): 545–565. Publisher Full Text
16. Vanders RL, Gibson PG, Wark PAB, et al.: Alterations in inflammatory, antiviral and regulatory cytokine responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from pregnant women with asthma. Respirology. 2013; 18(5): 827–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Tamasi L, Horvath I, Bohacs A, et al.: Asthma in pregnancy--immunological changes and clinical management. Respir Med. 2011; 105(2): 159–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al.: Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3320. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
19. Badr DA, Mattern J, Carlin A, et al.: Are clinical outcomes worse for pregnant women at ≥20 weeks' gestation infected with coronavirus disease 2019? A multicenter case-control study with propensity score matching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223(5): 764–768. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
20. Zambrano LD, Ellington S, Strid P, et al.: Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(44): 1641–1647. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
21. Bousquet J, Jutel M, Akdis CA, et al.: ARIA-EAACI statement on asthma and COVID-19 (June 2, 2020). Allergy. 2021; 76(3): 689–697. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
22. Martinez FD: Asthma in the Time of COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 203(7): 785–786. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
23. Martins I, Louwen F, Ayres-de-Campos D, et al.: EBCOG position statement on COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 262: 256–258. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021

Author details Author details

Hanneke A. Feitsma
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Jeroen van Exsel
Roles: Data Curation, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

S.A. Bendien has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Teva and Sanofi. J. Van Exsel has received fees for speaking at symposia from Novartis, GSK, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, ALK and Chiesi.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 01 Mar 2023, 10:1120

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.2

version 1

Published: 08 Nov 2021, 10:1120

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.1

© 2021 Schriek PS et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Schriek PS, Bendien SA, Feitsma HA and van Exsel J. New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:1120 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73188.1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021

Views

Reviewer Report 24 Nov 2021

Dominick Shaw, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.76824.r99613

This paper describes two interesting case reports where pregnant women develop features consistent with asthma. Features described include wheeze, variable FEV1 and breathlessness. Certainly, both presentations may be caused by new onset asthma but it's difficult to exclude the contribution of respiratory infection as both patients had evidence of respiratory pathogens.

Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation. Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

Both these cases nicely demonstrate the difficulty of making an asthma diagnosis and the physiological effects of a gravid uterus on both asthma and normal respiratory physiology.

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes
Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Asthma

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 13 Jan 2022

Paula Schriek, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, 2545AA, The Netherlands

13 Jan 2022

Author Response
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We ... Continue reading
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We also appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have provided. To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your e-mail dated 2021-11-24.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Paula Schriek

HAGA Teaching Hospital
Department of Respiratory medicine
Els Borst-Eilersplein 275
2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
Phone no.: (0031) 702104392, (0031) 639592319
Fax no.: (0031) 702102150
E-mail: p.schriek@hagaziekenhuis.nl

Reviewer 1
Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation.

Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

We fully agree the importance of a clear confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma. Especially as we are well aware of the under- and over-diagnosis of asthma worldwide. (Aaron SD et al. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1012-1020)
Based on our clinical experience with patients with asthma and pregnancy (working in a centre of excellence for severe asthma and our asthma-pregnancy outpatient clinic with a monthly multidisciplinary meeting for pregnant asthmatic patients), we believe these 2 patients have asthma and not “solely” post viral AHR. We agree it would be more convincing to support this by additional objective parameters.
Unfortunately we were not able to perform these additional diagnostic tests or perform a longer follow-up in both patients. However we think your consideration of AHR is of value to add to our considerations in the paper. We added this to the discussion section in the manuscript.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

We are not sure if we understood this comment as FEV1/FVC ratio is unaffected during the course of pregnancy (references mentioned below).
In the first case spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility, strongly elevated FeNO and elevated blood eosinophils levels which is compatible with asthma.
In the second case spirometry demonstrates variability of FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio (one time reduced with Z-score of -2.53), significant reversibility, strongly elevated FENO and blood eosinophils of 0.36×109/L under ICS, which is also compatible with asthma.

References:

1. Weinberger SE, Weiss ST, Cohen WR, et al. . Pregnancy and the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 559–581

2. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GA, et al. . Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol 2008; 586: 4735–4750.

3. Jensen D, Duffin J, Lam YM, et al. . Physiological mechanisms of hyperventilation during human pregnancy. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 76–86

4. McAuliffe F, Kametas N, Costello J, et al. . Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 765–769

5. Grindheim G, Toska K, Estensen ME, et al. . Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94–101

Revision of Discussion (paragraph 7, line 3-7)
A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, airway infection, particularly with viruses (like RSV or rhinovirus), may also cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although in the cases described in this report other biomarkers as FeNO and blood eosinophils are more compatible with the diagnosis of asthma(24). The exact role of viral respiratory tract infections in the onset or progression of asthma remains a subject of debate and in this setting should be considered on a case by case basis . Lastly, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

24. Empey DW, Laitinen LA, Jacobs L, Gold WM, Nadel JA. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(2):131-9.
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We also appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have provided. To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your e-mail dated 2021-11-24.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Paula Schriek

HAGA Teaching Hospital
Department of Respiratory medicine
Els Borst-Eilersplein 275
2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
Phone no.: (0031) 702104392, (0031) 639592319
Fax no.: (0031) 702102150
E-mail: p.schriek@hagaziekenhuis.nl

Reviewer 1
Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation.

Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

We fully agree the importance of a clear confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma. Especially as we are well aware of the under- and over-diagnosis of asthma worldwide. (Aaron SD et al. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1012-1020)
Based on our clinical experience with patients with asthma and pregnancy (working in a centre of excellence for severe asthma and our asthma-pregnancy outpatient clinic with a monthly multidisciplinary meeting for pregnant asthmatic patients), we believe these 2 patients have asthma and not “solely” post viral AHR. We agree it would be more convincing to support this by additional objective parameters.
Unfortunately we were not able to perform these additional diagnostic tests or perform a longer follow-up in both patients. However we think your consideration of AHR is of value to add to our considerations in the paper. We added this to the discussion section in the manuscript.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

We are not sure if we understood this comment as FEV1/FVC ratio is unaffected during the course of pregnancy (references mentioned below).
In the first case spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility, strongly elevated FeNO and elevated blood eosinophils levels which is compatible with asthma.
In the second case spirometry demonstrates variability of FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio (one time reduced with Z-score of -2.53), significant reversibility, strongly elevated FENO and blood eosinophils of 0.36×109/L under ICS, which is also compatible with asthma.

References:

1. Weinberger SE, Weiss ST, Cohen WR, et al. . Pregnancy and the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 559–581

2. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GA, et al. . Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol 2008; 586: 4735–4750.

3. Jensen D, Duffin J, Lam YM, et al. . Physiological mechanisms of hyperventilation during human pregnancy. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 76–86

4. McAuliffe F, Kametas N, Costello J, et al. . Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 765–769

5. Grindheim G, Toska K, Estensen ME, et al. . Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94–101

Revision of Discussion (paragraph 7, line 3-7)
A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, airway infection, particularly with viruses (like RSV or rhinovirus), may also cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although in the cases described in this report other biomarkers as FeNO and blood eosinophils are more compatible with the diagnosis of asthma(24). The exact role of viral respiratory tract infections in the onset or progression of asthma remains a subject of debate and in this setting should be considered on a case by case basis . Lastly, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

24. Empey DW, Laitinen LA, Jacobs L, Gold WM, Nadel JA. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(2):131-9.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 13 Jan 2022

Paula Schriek, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, 2545AA, The Netherlands

13 Jan 2022

Author Response
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We ... Continue reading
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We also appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have provided. To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your e-mail dated 2021-11-24.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Paula Schriek

HAGA Teaching Hospital
Department of Respiratory medicine
Els Borst-Eilersplein 275
2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
Phone no.: (0031) 702104392, (0031) 639592319
Fax no.: (0031) 702102150
E-mail: p.schriek@hagaziekenhuis.nl

Reviewer 1
Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation.

Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

We fully agree the importance of a clear confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma. Especially as we are well aware of the under- and over-diagnosis of asthma worldwide. (Aaron SD et al. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1012-1020)
Based on our clinical experience with patients with asthma and pregnancy (working in a centre of excellence for severe asthma and our asthma-pregnancy outpatient clinic with a monthly multidisciplinary meeting for pregnant asthmatic patients), we believe these 2 patients have asthma and not “solely” post viral AHR. We agree it would be more convincing to support this by additional objective parameters.
Unfortunately we were not able to perform these additional diagnostic tests or perform a longer follow-up in both patients. However we think your consideration of AHR is of value to add to our considerations in the paper. We added this to the discussion section in the manuscript.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

We are not sure if we understood this comment as FEV1/FVC ratio is unaffected during the course of pregnancy (references mentioned below).
In the first case spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility, strongly elevated FeNO and elevated blood eosinophils levels which is compatible with asthma.
In the second case spirometry demonstrates variability of FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio (one time reduced with Z-score of -2.53), significant reversibility, strongly elevated FENO and blood eosinophils of 0.36×109/L under ICS, which is also compatible with asthma.

References:

1. Weinberger SE, Weiss ST, Cohen WR, et al. . Pregnancy and the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 559–581

2. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GA, et al. . Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol 2008; 586: 4735–4750.

3. Jensen D, Duffin J, Lam YM, et al. . Physiological mechanisms of hyperventilation during human pregnancy. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 76–86

4. McAuliffe F, Kametas N, Costello J, et al. . Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 765–769

5. Grindheim G, Toska K, Estensen ME, et al. . Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94–101

Revision of Discussion (paragraph 7, line 3-7)
A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, airway infection, particularly with viruses (like RSV or rhinovirus), may also cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although in the cases described in this report other biomarkers as FeNO and blood eosinophils are more compatible with the diagnosis of asthma(24). The exact role of viral respiratory tract infections in the onset or progression of asthma remains a subject of debate and in this setting should be considered on a case by case basis . Lastly, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

24. Empey DW, Laitinen LA, Jacobs L, Gold WM, Nadel JA. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(2):131-9.
Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We also appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have provided. To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your e-mail dated 2021-11-24.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Paula Schriek

HAGA Teaching Hospital
Department of Respiratory medicine
Els Borst-Eilersplein 275
2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
Phone no.: (0031) 702104392, (0031) 639592319
Fax no.: (0031) 702102150
E-mail: p.schriek@hagaziekenhuis.nl

Reviewer 1
Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation.

Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

We fully agree the importance of a clear confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma. Especially as we are well aware of the under- and over-diagnosis of asthma worldwide. (Aaron SD et al. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1012-1020)
Based on our clinical experience with patients with asthma and pregnancy (working in a centre of excellence for severe asthma and our asthma-pregnancy outpatient clinic with a monthly multidisciplinary meeting for pregnant asthmatic patients), we believe these 2 patients have asthma and not “solely” post viral AHR. We agree it would be more convincing to support this by additional objective parameters.
Unfortunately we were not able to perform these additional diagnostic tests or perform a longer follow-up in both patients. However we think your consideration of AHR is of value to add to our considerations in the paper. We added this to the discussion section in the manuscript.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

We are not sure if we understood this comment as FEV1/FVC ratio is unaffected during the course of pregnancy (references mentioned below).
In the first case spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility, strongly elevated FeNO and elevated blood eosinophils levels which is compatible with asthma.
In the second case spirometry demonstrates variability of FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio (one time reduced with Z-score of -2.53), significant reversibility, strongly elevated FENO and blood eosinophils of 0.36×109/L under ICS, which is also compatible with asthma.

References:

1. Weinberger SE, Weiss ST, Cohen WR, et al. . Pregnancy and the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 559–581

2. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GA, et al. . Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol 2008; 586: 4735–4750.

3. Jensen D, Duffin J, Lam YM, et al. . Physiological mechanisms of hyperventilation during human pregnancy. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 76–86

4. McAuliffe F, Kametas N, Costello J, et al. . Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 765–769

5. Grindheim G, Toska K, Estensen ME, et al. . Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94–101

Revision of Discussion (paragraph 7, line 3-7)
A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, airway infection, particularly with viruses (like RSV or rhinovirus), may also cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although in the cases described in this report other biomarkers as FeNO and blood eosinophils are more compatible with the diagnosis of asthma(24). The exact role of viral respiratory tract infections in the onset or progression of asthma remains a subject of debate and in this setting should be considered on a case by case basis . Lastly, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

24. Empey DW, Laitinen LA, Jacobs L, Gold WM, Nadel JA. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(2):131-9.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 2 (revision) 01 Mar 23	read	read
Version 1 08 Nov 21	read

Dominick Shaw, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Annika W. M. Goorsenberg, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

7 Views

04 Apr 2023 | for Version 2

Annika W. M. Goorsenberg, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

This case report study extensively describes the presentation and diagnostic process of two pregnant dyspnoic patients. This is an important topic in which large knowledge gaps are still present. Although both cases are quite different (other trimesters, readmission in the second case), the authors are certain both patients have newly onset asthma during pregnancy.

I agree with reviewer 1 that the differential diagnosis with airway hyperresponsiveness after (viral) infections should also be taken into account. Especially as follow-up is short as the authors conclude themselves. The adjustments made regarding this topic, adding the important limitations of these cases in the discussion, are sufficient in my opinion.

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes
Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Severe asthma, endoscopic treatments for pulmonary diseases, endobronchial imaging

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

15 Mar 2023 | for Version 2

Dominick Shaw, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

They have addressed my comments appropriately and amended the discussion paragraph suitably. I’m happy to approve the submission.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Asthma, digital health

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

31 Views

24 Nov 2021 | for Version 1

Dominick Shaw, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

31 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes
Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Asthma

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

13 Jan 2022

Paula Schriek, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, 2545AA, The Netherlands

Dear Dominick Shaw,

We would like to thank the reviewer for her time and critical evaluation of our manuscript entitled “New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports”. We also appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper. We have incorporated changes that reflect the detailed suggestions you have provided. To facilitate your review of our revisions, the following is a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your e-mail dated 2021-11-24.

On behalf of all authors,

Sincerely,

Paula Schriek

HAGA Teaching Hospital
Department of Respiratory medicine
Els Borst-Eilersplein 275
2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
Phone no.: (0031) 702104392, (0031) 639592319
Fax no.: (0031) 702102150
E-mail: p.schriek@hagaziekenhuis.nl

Reviewer 1
Airway infection, particularly with viruses, is well known to cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). AHR can occur for several months after initial infection and is associated with similar symptoms to asthma. Some authors argue that airway hyperresponsiveness alone is enough to make a diagnosis of asthma, but other purists may argue that asthma is a combination of airway inflammation and inflammation.

Either way it would be interesting to know whether symptoms persist following treatment, or resolution, of the underlying infection. Other factors pointing towards asthma would include an elevated blood eosinophil count and degree of reversibility in FEV1.

We fully agree the importance of a clear confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma. Especially as we are well aware of the under- and over-diagnosis of asthma worldwide. (Aaron SD et al. Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1012-1020)
Based on our clinical experience with patients with asthma and pregnancy (working in a centre of excellence for severe asthma and our asthma-pregnancy outpatient clinic with a monthly multidisciplinary meeting for pregnant asthmatic patients), we believe these 2 patients have asthma and not “solely” post viral AHR. We agree it would be more convincing to support this by additional objective parameters.
Unfortunately we were not able to perform these additional diagnostic tests or perform a longer follow-up in both patients. However we think your consideration of AHR is of value to add to our considerations in the paper. We added this to the discussion section in the manuscript.

Some factors make a diagnosis of asthma less likely-both cases had normal FEV1/FVC ratios (which reflect the effect on lung function of a gravid uterus); initial response to high dose oral Prednisolone was poor in the first case and lastly asthma symptoms seemed to improve after delivery.

We are not sure if we understood this comment as FEV1/FVC ratio is unaffected during the course of pregnancy (references mentioned below).
In the first case spirometry demonstrates significant reversibility, strongly elevated FeNO and elevated blood eosinophils levels which is compatible with asthma.
In the second case spirometry demonstrates variability of FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio (one time reduced with Z-score of -2.53), significant reversibility, strongly elevated FENO and blood eosinophils of 0.36×109/L under ICS, which is also compatible with asthma.

References:

1. Weinberger SE, Weiss ST, Cohen WR, et al. . Pregnancy and the lung. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121: 559–581
2. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GA, et al. . Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol 2008; 586: 4735–4750.
3. Jensen D, Duffin J, Lam YM, et al. . Physiological mechanisms of hyperventilation during human pregnancy. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2008; 161: 76–86
4. McAuliffe F, Kametas N, Costello J, et al. . Respiratory function in singleton and twin pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 765–769
5. Grindheim G, Toska K, Estensen ME, et al. . Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94–101

Revision of Discussion (paragraph 7, line 3-7)
A limitation of these case reports is their relatively short duration of follow-up and the fact that describing these cases cannot lead to conclusions regarding causality. Furthermore, airway infection, particularly with viruses (like RSV or rhinovirus), may also cause airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), although in the cases described in this report other biomarkers as FeNO and blood eosinophils are more compatible with the diagnosis of asthma(24). The exact role of viral respiratory tract infections in the onset or progression of asthma remains a subject of debate and in this setting should be considered on a case by case basis . Lastly, no previous data and diagnostic asthma tests were available, so we cannot fully exclude a diagnosis of asthma prior to these pregnancies. However, based on the extensive medical history of both patients this seems unlikely.

24. Empey DW, Laitinen LA, Jacobs L, Gold WM, Nadel JA. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976;113(2):131-9.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Bidad K, Heidarnazhad H, Pourpak Z, et al.: Frequency of asthma as the cause of dyspnea in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 111(2): 140–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Abdullah K, Zhu J, Gershon A, et al.: Effect of asthma exacerbation during pregnancy in women with asthma: a population-based cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020; 55(2): 1901335. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Baghlaf H, Spence AR, Czuzoj-Shulman N, et al.: Pregnancy outcomes among women with asthma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32(8): 1325–1331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Yeh JJ, Wang YC, Hsu WH, et al.: Incident asthma and Mycoplasma pneumoniae: A nationwide cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 137(4): 1017–1023.e6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Sutherland ER, Martin RJ: Asthma and atypical bacterial infection. Chest. 2007; 132(6): 1962–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Racicot K, Kwon JY, Aldo P, et al.: Understanding the complexity of the immune system during pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014; 72(2): 107–16. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] 7. Mor G, Aldo P, Alvero AB: The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017; 17(8): 469–482. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Global initiative for asthma: Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. 2019; [cited 2020]. Reference Source

[9] 9. Nisar N, Guleria R, Kumar S, et al.: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role in asthma. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(976): 100–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[10] 10. Yano T, Ichikawa Y, Komatu S, et al.: Association of Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigen with initial onset of bronchial asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 149(5): 1348–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Biscardi S, Lorrot M, Marc E, et al.: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and asthma in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(10): 1341–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Saglani S: Viral infections and the development of asthma in children. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013; 1(4): 139–50. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[13] 13. Vieira AC, Pite H, Morais-Almeida M: Asthma and pregnancy in the 2020 decade: still a matter of concern. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 1–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Hadfield KA, McCracken SA, Ashton AW, et al.: Regulated suppression of NF-κB throughout pregnancy maintains a favourable cytokine environment necessary for pregnancy success. J Reprod Immunol. 2011; 89(1): 1–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Mor G, Abrahams V: Immunology of implantation. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. In: Arici A, editor. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2002; 22(3): 545–565. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Vanders RL, Gibson PG, Wark PAB, et al.: Alterations in inflammatory, antiviral and regulatory cytokine responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from pregnant women with asthma. Respirology. 2013; 18(5): 827–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Tamasi L, Horvath I, Bohacs A, et al.: Asthma in pregnancy--immunological changes and clinical management. Respir Med. 2011; 105(2): 159–64. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al.: Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3320. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] 19. Badr DA, Mattern J, Carlin A, et al.: Are clinical outcomes worse for pregnant women at ≥20 weeks' gestation infected with coronavirus disease 2019? A multicenter case-control study with propensity score matching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223(5): 764–768. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[20] 20. Zambrano LD, Ellington S, Strid P, et al.: Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69(44): 1641–1647. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[21] 21. Bousquet J, Jutel M, Akdis CA, et al.: ARIA-EAACI statement on asthma and COVID-19 (June 2, 2020). Allergy. 2021; 76(3): 689–697. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[22] 22. Martinez FD: Asthma in the Time of COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 203(7): 785–786. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[23] 23. Martins I, Louwen F, Ayres-de-Campos D, et al.: EBCOG position statement on COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 262: 256–258. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

New onset asthma during pregnancy: two case reports

Abstract

Keywords

Abbreviations

Introduction

Table 1. Differential diagnosis of dyspnoea during pregnancy.

Case reports

Case one

Follow-up and outcomes

Case two

Follow-up and outcomes

Discussion

Data availability

Consent

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated