The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change

Galit Goldfarb; Yaron Sela

doi:10.12688/f1000research.73470.2

Home Browse The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Systematic Review

Revised

The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Galit Goldfarb ¹, Yaron Sela¹

PUBLISHED 20 Jun 2023

Author details Author details

¹ Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

Galit Goldfarb
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Yaron Sela
Roles: Formal Analysis, Validation

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

As of now, no study has combined research from different sciences to determine the most suitable diet for humans. This issue is urgent due to the predicted population growth, the effect of this on the environment, and the deterioration of human health and associated costs.

METHODS:

A literature review determined whether an optimal diet for humans exists and what such a diet is, followed by six meta-analyses. The standard criteria for conducting meta-analyses of observational studies were followed. A review of literature reporting Hazard Ratios with a 95% confidence interval for red meat intake, dairy intake, plant-based diet, fiber intake, and serum IGF-1 levels were extracted to calculate effect sizes.

RESULTS:

Results calculated using NCSS software show that high meat consumption increases mortality probability by 18% on average and increases diabetes risk by 50%. Plant-based and high-fiber diets decrease mortality by 15% and 20% respectively (p < .001). Plant-based diets decreased diabetes risk by 27%, and dairy consumption (measured by increased IGF-1 levels) increased cancer probability by 48% (p < 0.01). A vegetarian or Mediterranean diet was not found to decrease the probability of heart disease. A vegetarian diet can be healthy or not, depending on the foods consumed. A Mediterranean diet with high quantities of meat and dairy products will not produce the health effects desired. The main limitations of the study were that observational studies were heterogeneous and limited by potential confounders.

DISCUSSION:

The literature and meta-analyses point to an optimal diet for humans that has followed our species from the beginnings of humankind. The optimal diet is a whole food, high fiber, low-fat, 90+% plant-based diet. This diet allowed humans to become the most developed species on Earth.

To ensure people’s nutritional needs are met healthily and sustainably, governmental dietary interventions are necessary.

Keywords

Optimal nutrition, optimal diet, diet for health, early human diet, human evolution and diet, nutrition, nutrition and disease, diet for health, nutrition for health,

Corresponding author: Galit Goldfarb

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2023 Goldfarb G and Sela Y. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Goldfarb G and Sela Y. The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1135 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.2) First published: 10 Nov 2021, 10:1135 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.1) Latest published: 20 Jun 2023, 10:1135 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The revised version of the article incorporates several changes based on the reviewer's feedback to improve the paper's clarity, structure, and content. One of the main changes in the revised version includes information on current recommended dietary patterns in the introduction section. The methods section has been made clearer by eliminating unnecessary sentences and including information on quality control for paper selection and identification.
Furthermore, the revised version now explains the rationale for focusing on food groups instead of dietary patterns and includes a description of the different dietary patterns included in the review. The discussion section now addresses the concerns of vulnerable populations in low-income countries. The geographic representation of the study has also been discussed in detail.
Overall, the revised version provides a clearer and more comprehensive picture of the research topic and the findings presented in the paper. It is expected that the changes made to the study will improve its readability, increase its scientific value, and make it more relevant to a broader audience interested in human nutrition and health.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Katherine Curi Quinto
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Aysha Karim Kiani

Introduction

There has yet to be a study combining research from all available sciences to conclude the most suitable diet for human anatomy and physiology that can heal and prevent chronic disease while being sustainable for the environment. It is essential to address this issue urgently due to the predicted growing human population, increasing healthcare costs, and lessening agricultural land to grow foods due to global warming.

Research shows that the human population is growing at a rate of 360,000 births per day, with only 180,000 deaths per day. The global population is predicted to rise from 7.6 to 8.5 billion by 2030 to 9.7 billion by 2050 and continue to expand to 10.5 billion people by 2060.¹ According to conservative estimates, with our current food choices and the growing population of prosperous people around the world, we will need to produce 70% more food than we are currently producing.²

Due to our habitual behavior patterns, global weather conditions are changing, leading to 17% less productivity from land.³ Based on sound, evidence-based findings, scientists agree that today's global warming is primarily (more than two-thirds) caused by specific human activities that lead to an increased release of heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere.⁴

Statistics also show that there are 870 million starving people on our planet, and 12.5% of the global population is undernourished. We also see 1.9 billion people who are consuming too much, and one million people are obese. 46% of all children are underweight.⁵^,⁶

Another disturbing statistic is that 95% of the global population has sub-optimum health. This number will rise over the coming decades if we continue business as usual.⁷ Just 4.3% of the worldwide population has no health problems, that's one in 20 people, and a third of the world's population suffers from more than five ailments, according to an analysis by the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD), that was published in The Lancet in 2013. Only 0.03% of adults over 80 are healthy with no disorders.⁸ Our current dietary choices are unsupportive of health and longevity.

Individuals need clarification on the ideal diet for our species that promotes longevity and health. There are new confusing daily findings that are not based on sound scientific evidence, including many fad diets.

On the one side, we see a growth in the global human population; on the other side, climate change leads to less land productivity, both coinciding.

Governments need to know the ideal dietary habits for humans to suitably amend their policies to support healthily feeding their population while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The EAT-Lancet Commission recently proposed a planetary health diet that is deemed beneficial for both people and the planet.⁹ This highlights the increasing recognition that dietary patterns have a significant impact on our world. However, determining the optimal diet for humans is crucial for the well-being of future generations, as it can provide unprecedented clarity on health and nutrition, as well as environmental concerns.

This research aims to determine whether there is one ideal diet for all humans. And if so, to examine how individuals and governments can use this knowledge to create policies that ensure the growing global population is fed healthily and sustainably without causing further environmental destruction.

The media strongly influences most people’s eating habits and sends mixed, often biased messages. Processed foods have become the norm due to their cheap pricing and easy accessibility and preparation. In contrast, fruits and vegetables, often not government subsidized, are less affordable and less available due to their shorter shelf life.

Individuals need to have a set standard for healthy food based on human needs and access to healthy natural foods at reasonable prices to enable them to improve their health and require less healthcare in the future.

There are several objectives for this study.

1. To fully understand the ideal dietary habits for humans that support health and longevity and are most suitable for our species. This will ensure clarity regarding which foods support health and longevity.
2. The research into the ideal diet for humans will achieve a standard by which governments can produce health policies, subsidies, and taxes based on what indeed leads to health for our species, reducing the need and costs for healthcare, especially for the growing elderly population. These policies will further encourage people to make better choices for environmental sustainability to ensure a sustainable future and prevent climate consequences. These tools will also help prevent future nations' starvation and the increased violence that usually goes hand in hand with such situations.

An extensive literature review combining data from different scientific fields helped determine underlying factors relating to the ideal diet for humans.

The research focuses on food groups and their effects on health. The rationality to do the study according to food groups rather than examining existing dietary patterns, which include all the components of the modern-day diet, was to analyze the specific effects of different food components on health outcomes, and not all food groups consumed today were part of the early human diet.

Furthermore, food patterns may be misleading, as the Mediterranean diet is today. It is unclear which food groups in the Mediterranean diet provide improved health outcomes.

Moreover, food groups simplify dietary recommendations as most foods in a food group have a similar constitution of essential nutrients, making it easier to consume sufficient nutrients without calculating quantities available in each specific food. Using food groups also allows for flexible, easy, and quick tailoring of healthy menus according to taste preferences, allergies, and intolerances, making the application of more nutritious, sustainable diets easier to achieve.

A look at human evolutionary research was essential for a thorough approach to this subject. The study of human evolution sets the stage for studying the ideal diet for humans because considering our current eating habits without examining human history from the beginning of humankind will be searching for a solution to a problem without using the vast information we have collected throughout history.

The literature review points to a major change within the hominin lineage (Australopithecus) occurring about 5 million years ago with the evolution of bipedalism.

This locomotive change came to hominin benefit about 2 million years ago, following a global change in weather conditions when the earth entered the Ice Age.

The North African tropical rain forest began receding and the savanna grasslands expanded. Bipedalism gave hominins the ability to leave the shrinking rainforest where food resources were dwindling as a result of the ice age, for the growing savannas.¹⁰ Skull fossils show that hominins living in the rainforest had a brain size of 320-380 cm³ in volume.¹¹^–¹³

Upon moving to the savanna grasslands, hominins needed to change dietary practices to survive. Herbaceous leaves that were plentiful in the rain forests were sparse on the savanna, forcing hominins to start feeding on other foods. Dental microwear and stable isotope analysis show evidence of C4 resources, mainly underground storage organs (USOs) (tubers, roots, and bulbs), as a significant component of hominin diets on the savanna.¹⁴^–²²

The next hominin fossils found of the genus Homo, Homo habilis, demonstrate a steady process of brain growth to 400-600 cc.

The dry savanna habitat was also rich in sedge and grass grains, rich in carbohydrates, perfect to nutritionally support hominin brain growth.²⁰^–²⁸

A larger brain requires more energy to fuel. It is a metabolically expensive organ, and therefore requires a stable, high-energy, nutrient-dense food source to support its growth under natural selection.¹⁶^,²⁰^,²⁹

Fossils of the next ancestor of the genus Homo, Homo ergaster, who lived exclusively on the savanna, show a brain size 50% larger than their predecessor Homo habilis (800–1200 cc).³⁰^,³¹ The larger more advanced brain allowed Homo ergaster to thrive in the hostile savanna environment. Homo ergaster had a jaw and tooth size closely resembling that of modern humans, and fossils show that their digestive tracts grew smaller.

Due to the vast number of animals on the savanna, it would seem obvious to suggest that the change in diet was towards a meat-based diet, however, to be dependent on meat as a stable food source on the savanna, hominins would have needed to hunt big game that roamed the savanna. To hunt successfully, hominins would have needed to master the skills of hunting. Research suggests that hunting skills have a very long learning curve.³²^–³⁴

Evidence also suggests that big game roaming the savanna were a poor food source for hominins. Their meat was lean, with almost no fat, and the protein levels were too high to consume in abundance, rendering them an inefficient source of calories.

Dietary protein, when consumed in excess, becomes toxic to the human body. Humans can metabolize about 250 grams of protein per day; exceeding this level produces toxic waste that the body has difficulty eliminating. Furthermore, some of the protein consumed is required for cellular growth and repair and would not be available for energy. In fact, 250g of protein provides only 1000 calories, not nearly enough to sustain a modern-day sedentary adult, let alone an active hunter-gatherer on the harsh African savanna. It is well documented that those who consume excessive amounts of lean protein, without sufficient fat, develop a condition called “mal de caribou,”³⁵ whereby ammonia builds up in the blood. If this diet persists, the person will suffer from diarrhea and mineral losses and will eventually die.³⁶^–³⁹

Research shows that modern hunter-gatherer groups such as the Hadza and San, with modern sized brains, fail to catch meat on 97% of their hunts, and share the meat mainly with their co-hunters. Furthermore, hunting is usually practiced when staple foods are available in abundance.⁴⁰^–⁴⁶ It is suggested that hunting occurred primarily for rituals and shows of courage rather than solely for dietary necessity.⁴⁶^–⁴⁸

In 1993, more than 1,000 researchers participated in a study titled The Lost Crops of Africa, examining ancient crops of Africa. The report comes to a clear conclusion: “Grass seeds have sustained humans throughout time.”⁴⁹^,⁵⁰

In 1984, anthropologists found the nearly complete skeleton of a Homo ergaster child assumed to be 1.7 million years old. The skeleton, referred to as Nariokotome Boy,⁵¹^,⁵² had a brain size of 880 cm³ in volume. In the fossil remains we see evidence from the shape of the ribcage, that at this stage, hominin gut size shrunk to the size of a modern human gut. This shrinkage of gut size allowed the available energy to be directed to feed the growing brain.

The brain is an incredibly energy expensive organ using 22% of human basal metabolic energy. To accommodate the increase in brain size, humanity’s forebears needed a good, high-quality, readily available food source.⁵³

Such food sources grew readily all year round on the savanna and include legumes, grains, plants with USOs, seeds and fruits.⁵⁴^–⁷⁶

The switch to starchy foods, very different from the dietary habits in the rainforests, allowed early humans to thrive on the savanna with shorter guts which required less energy to maintain. The excess energy became available for brain tissue growth⁷⁷ because hominin survival depended on intelligence.

Enzyme inhibitors in plants stop enzymatic reactions. As a result, enzyme inhibitors can have an anti-nutritional effect.⁷⁷^–⁷⁹

Cooking deactivates these anti-nutrients. But when cooking was still unavailable, anti-nutrients could easily be deactivated by a simple soaking in water⁶¹^,⁷⁹^,⁸⁰ causing enzyme inhibitors to stop functioning. Also, an adapted gut microbiota helps the breakdown of such starches.⁷⁹ Furthermore, young grass grains do not have enzyme inhibitors.

The probable low bio-accessibility of nutrients from legumes and grains is less relevant due to the wealth of legumes, grains and tubers available on the savanna.⁷⁹^–⁸³

USOs, by contrast, have a physical defense mechanism by being located underground or covered in thick outer layer. USO-bearing plants are edible in raw form.⁷⁴

Fossil dental calculus, accepted as a significant pool of dietary data, show that Neanderthals 400,000 years ago ate a wide variety of plant matter especially USOs and grass seeds. Neither geographic region, species, nor known stone tool technology had a significant impact on the number of plant species consumed.⁸⁴ Fossilized Neanderthal feces was also found to have large amounts of plant matter.⁸⁵ Other research has also revealed that plant foods had a leading role in early human diets.⁸⁴^,⁸⁶^–⁹¹ In later fossils, evidence of damaged grass seeds in dental calculus are a sign of cooking.⁸⁴^,⁹²^–⁹⁴

The control of fire by hominins began sometime between 400,000-700,000 years ago. At this time, another major brain growth spurt in hominin fossils is observed (from 800 cm³ to 1,100 cm³ in volume).⁸⁶^,⁹⁵^–¹⁰⁰ Fire enabled a reduction in the need for chewing and detoxification of anti-nutrients, making more energy and nutrients available for the brain and the body.¹⁰¹^,¹⁰²

Approximately 195,000 (±100,000) years ago evidence shows that the first Homo sapiens (modern humans) appeared and replaced other Homo species in Africa. Omo, the oldest fossil remains of modern humans, show that they had the same anatomical build as we have today.¹⁰³^,¹⁰⁴

12,000 years ago, agriculture began at the geographic corridor through which humans left Africa. The first foods chosen to be grown through agriculture were grains, emphasizing their significance for humans during the hunting-gathering period.

Grains and legumes were easily domesticated from their wild ancestors because they required very little genetic change to domesticate.¹⁰⁵

Animals were domesticated 6000 years ago only in a few areas on earth, principally in Asia, and Europe. Animals were rarely domesticated in America. Animals were not domesticated in tropical Africa or Australia.¹⁰⁶^–¹⁰⁸ This lack of domestication is probably due to the abundance and variety of grains, legumes and USOs found in these places, reducing the need to domesticate animals for food.

The domestication of animals for food resulted in increased meat consumption beyond previous consumption patterns of hunter-gatherers who ate meat sparsely when available.¹⁰⁹^–¹¹²

Human brain size decreased after the dawn of agriculture.¹¹²^,¹¹³

Previous to agriculture, life expectancy was past the age of menopause in women. When agriculture was introduced, life expectancy dropped to 40 years because human eating habits changed dramatically.¹¹²^,¹¹⁴ Only certain crops were grown, exposing farmers to many risks and leading people to suffer from severe nutrient deficiencies, shortening lifespans.¹⁰⁵^,¹¹²^,¹¹⁵^–¹¹⁷

After the industrial revolution, life expectancy increased, but quality of life did not necessarily follow suit.¹¹⁸^–¹²⁴

The awe for meat and processed grain consumption increased with the industrial revolution when food processing became popular for storage and transport. Grains that could originally supply a wealth of nutrients, were stripped of their healthy bran and germ layers becoming nutritionally deplete. This move to processed grains caused large populations to develop nutrient deficiencies including protein deficiency which led to the discovery of a disease named Kwashiorkor. Kwashiorkor was caused by consumption of nutrient and protein depleted dried grains that were ground into flour for children as food. Kwashiorkor sometimes healed with animal protein consumption.¹²⁵^,¹²⁶

However, nutrient and protein shortage were never a problem for humans until grain processing began.¹²⁷^–¹³⁰

A whole-food, mostly plant-based diet, from varied plant sources, as ancient humans consumed, easily incorporates all of the nine essential amino acids for humans from different legumes, nuts and seeds.

Protein content in human breast milk is lowest in comparison with other lactating mammals and is higher in carbohydrates, and mono- and polyunsaturated fats.¹³¹^,¹³²

This suggests that although protein is necessary for human health, consuming large quantities of protein carries a considerable price on human health.

In recent decades, the world has seen a rise in NCDs such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Seven out of every ten deaths are due to NCDs.¹³³

Nowadays domesticated animals are rich in fat. The fatty deposits among muscle fibers soften the cooked meat and improve their flavor.

The fat composition of domesticated meat has also changed over time. Previously, animal fat had equal amounts of ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids (FAs). Nowadays animal fat is rich in inflammatory ω-6 FAs and low in health promoting ω-3 FAs because of the intensive rearing methods.¹³⁴^,¹³⁵ The levels of ω-3 FAs in meat 100 years ago were 170 mg/100 g of meat. Now they are 20 mg/100 g of meat.¹³⁴^,¹³⁶

Animal milk is also less suitable for human consumption. Milking animals only began around 6000 years ago.¹³⁷

Most of the current world population (75%) is lactose intolerant, leading to side effects such as mineral losses, diarrhea, cramping, bloating, and gas.

It is also common for only about 25% of dairy calcium from milk to be absorbed. The remaining unabsorbed 75% may end up deposited around the body, leading to atherosclerosis, gout and kidney stones.

Methods

A look at mortality statistics for people following different diets as well as a look at different dietary patterns and the most common diseases in the world today (cancer, heart disease and diabetes, were examined through a collection of studies performed in the last decade only. The results were calculated using NCSS 2019 software available for free at: https://www.ncss.com/download/ncss/free-trial/. Furthermore, other meta-analyses that were performed in this time period were used as a comparison between results received with the meta-analysis results received in this research.

Search strategy

The standard criteria for conducting and reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies was followed (Stroup et al, 2000). Studies were identified through a systematic review of the literature by using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases against a list of pre-defined comprehensive search terms on 17 March 2019 and updated on 28 March 2019 to search for more recent papers. Searches were run independently in each database because of their different set-ups, different thesaurus terms such as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and other relevant subject heading searching, and keywords. Exclusion criteria were (a) reviews, protocols, conference abstracts, practice guidelines, opinions, discussion pieces, editorials, commentaries, book chapters, and case reviews. (b) No limits were applied for language and foreign papers were translated (c) publication dates before December 2008, and after December 2018, except meta-analyses which were accepted.

Seven different meta-analyses combining the results of multiple studies were performed to support the argument that this ideal diet for humans can prove itself as the optimal diet also in our day and age. Each meta-analysis had its own hypothesis. The probability factor (p = value) was calculated to see if the null hypothesis was rejected or not. If the probability was small (less than 5% or less than 1 in 20 chance of being wrong), then the null hypothesis was rejected, and I could safely conclude that there was a connection between the independent explanatory variable and the dependent variable.

The search terms used for all studies included keywords, and subject headings, for example “meat,” “beef,” “red meat”, processed meat”, “unprocessed red meat”, “pork,” “veal,” “lamb,” “steak,” “hamburger,” “ham,” “bacon,” or “sausage,” “IGF-1,” “dairy,” “milk,” “Plant-based,” “vegan,” “vegetarian,” “fiber,” “Mediterranean diet,” “healthy diet” in combination with “mortality,” or “death”, or “heart disease,” or “diabetes,” or “cancer.” In addition, the reference lists of relevant publications were also searched for more studies. The search is archived at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/64NAM.

Study selection

Papers were selected if they met the followed inclusion criteria (a) Prospective studies performed only in the last ten years, between December 2008 and December 2018 (as required by OUS university), (b) studies that reported relative risks and Hazard Ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the associations of unprocessed red meat, processed meat, total red meat consumption, dairy, high fiber, plant-based, vegan, vegetarian, with all-cause mortality, diabetes, cancer and heart disease. (c) Meta-analyses that were performed in the last ten years but included also studies performed from beforehand, were added to each meta-analysis performed for every subject so that the aggregated HR derived from the analysis could be compared and thus, the results would have a more holistic nature. (d) Studies had sufficient analytical data.

The search strategy retrieved 91 articles. After removing the duplicates, the title/abstract screening process identified 88 studies. After a further full-text assessment for sufficient statistics, 44 articles were excluded from the systematic review and 37 met the inclusion criteria for all studies, (please see search strategy in data availability section). No additional publications were found through reference lists and hand searching.

Data extraction

From each publication, the first author's last name, year of publication, study location, gender, age, sample size (total number of participants and number of deaths or disease), relative risks and Hazard Ratios with a 95% confidence interval for each category of red meat intake, dairy intake, plant-based diet, fiber intake, serum IGF-1 levels, and covariates adjusted for in the analysis were extracted.

Data analysis and statistical methods

The primary goal of meta-analysis was to compute the aggregative effect of specific food group consumption on mortality/disease, taking into consideration standalone and heterogeneous results. In order to examine the aggregate effect size, individual studies were gathered estimating mortality of people consuming a specific food group (e.g. red meat/high-fiber/plant-based), in comparison with people who do not consume this specific food group. Each individual study calculated Hazard Ratio (HR), the event rate corresponding to the conditions (dead/alive; disease/no disease) described by two levels of an explanatory variable (red meat vs. no red meat; vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian; high fiber vs. low fiber).

The main function of the meta-analysis was to estimate effects in the population by combining the effect sizes from a variety of studies. Specifically, the estimate is a weighted mean of the effect sizes. The ‘weight’ that is used is usually a value reflecting the sampling accuracy of the effect size, which is typically a function of sample size. The final goal of the meta-analysis was to determine the aggregative effect size beyond all effects that were gathered, its significance, 95% confidence interval and possible moderators for the results (variables that could explain non-random variance between effects).

For the final effect, the HR as effect-size estimate; a confidence interval (lower limit [LL] and upper limit [UL]); Q statistic; and its p value were reported. Q, a chi-square statistic, reflects variability among effect estimates due to true heterogeneity, rather than sampling error. The null hypothesis is that all studies used to calculate each effect, shared the same effect size. Under the null hypothesis, Q should follow a central chi square distribution with degrees of freedom equal to k − 1. When the p value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected, and it can be concluded that there is true variance in the studies' common effect size.¹³⁹

The random-effects model which assumes that variance between effects is basically random, was applied, and therefore any variance was not attributed to specific moderators. Forest plots, which depicts the effects on a single figure, and also the aggregated effect and its confidence interval, were produced.

Seven separate meta-analysis were performed:

• Meat consumption and mortality
• Plant-based nutrition and mortality
• High fiber diet and mortality
• Plant-based nutrition and diabetes
• Vegetarian/Mediterranean diet and heart disease
• IGF-1 in dairy products and cancer
• Meat consumption and diabetes

The results were calculated using NCSS 2019 software which has a statistical package for calculating aggregated hazard ratio (HR). The input included individual HR from each study, variance for each HR (calculated as SE², and SE (standard error that was calculated manually using CI with the following calculation:

SE = HR - lower border of CI \div 2

Outputs included the following figures:

1. A forest plot which shows individual HR and its CI, in addition to aggregated HR and CI.
2. A radial plot which shows the study bias for aggregated HR according to heterogeneity.

The results are as follows:

1. Meat Consumption and Mortality
To assess aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of meat consumption and mortality, two individual studies were used yielding three effect sizes (see Table 1).
Results of meta-analysis (n = 666,995) showed that the aggregated effect size between meat consumption and mortality is HR = 1.18 (HR S.E. = 0.03, 95% CI [1.12,1.24]) (see Figure 1). This result is significant χ² (DF = 2) = 3737.16, p < 0.001 and means that people consuming meat at any time point during the study period were 18% more likely to die than people that were not consuming meat, and we are 95% confident that people consuming meat are between 12% and 24% more likely to die at any given age than people not consuming meat.
No heterogeneity was found between studies, meaning there are no potential moderators which could bias this effect, Q (2) = 3.80, p = 0.09. Hence, differences between individual studies are not significant and considered as homogeneous (see Figure 2, all studies are within the CI borders).
To conclude, consuming red meat significantly increases death probability by about 20% on average in comparison with not consuming red meat. This effect size is larger compared with effect size received by Wang et al.¹⁴² (HR = 1.15). In addition, it is important to note that in a similar meta-analysis conducted by Larsson and Orsini,¹⁴³ no significant consistent effect was found between meat consumption and mortality.
2. Plant-Based Nutrition and Mortality
To assess aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of plant-based nutrition and mortality, four individual studies were used yielding four effect sizes (see Table 2).
Results of the meta-analysis (n = 218,712 people) showed that the aggregated effect size between plant-based nutrition and mortality is HR = 0.85 (HR S.E. = 0.04, 95% CI [0.77,0.94]) (see Figure 3). This result is significant χ² (4) = 3497.7, p < 0.001 and means that people consuming a plant-based diet at any time point during the study periods were 15% less likely to die than people that were not consuming a plant-based diet, and we are 95% confident that the true value is lying between 6%-23% (we are 95% sure that people consuming a plant-based diet are between 6% and 23% less likely to die at any period of time than people not consuming a plant-based diet).
A significant heterogeneity was found between studies, meaning that the studies included in this analysis were different by several methodological aspects which could bias the aggregated HR effect, Q (3) = 20.70, p < 0.01. Differences between individual studies are significant and considered heterogeneous (see Figure 4, result of 4 - Kim, Caulfield, & Rebholz,¹⁴⁷ exceeds CI borders), in this study among Seventh-day Adventists, vegetarians were healthier than non-vegetarians but this cannot be ascribed only to the absence of meat.
To conclude, plant-based nutrition significantly decreases death probability by about 15% on average, in comparison with non-plant-based nutrition.
3. High Fiber Diet and Mortality
To assess aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of a high fiber diet and mortality, six individual studies were used yielding six effect sizes. In addition, two meta-analyses were gathered in order to compare aggregated HR derived from our analysis. These meta-analyses were documented in order to compare results between independent meta-analysis and published meta-analyses (see Table 3).
Results of meta-analysis (n = 978,380) showed that the aggregated effect size between fiber diet and mortality is HR = 0.80 (HR S.E. = 0.03, 95% CI [0.74,0.86]). See Figure 5). This result is significant χ² (5) = 8155.70, p < 0.001. and means that people consuming a high fiber diet at any time point during the study period were 20% less likely to die than people that were not consuming a high fiber diet, and we are 95% confident that the true value is lying between 14%-26% (we are 95% sure that people not consuming meat are between 14% and 26% less likely to die at a given age than people consuming a high fiber diet).
A significant heterogeneity was found between studies, meaning that the studies included in this analysis are different by several methodological aspects which could bias the aggregated effect, Q (5) = 21.44, p < 0.01. Hence, differences between individual studies are significant and considered heterogeneous (see Figure 6, result of 3. Dominguez et al.,¹⁵⁰ exceeds CI borders).
To conclude, a high fiber diet significantly decreases death probability by about 20% on average, in comparison with non-fiber diet. This effect size is in line with effect size received by Yang et al.¹⁵⁵ (HR = 0.84), and by Kim & Je¹⁵⁴ (HR = 0.77).
4. Plant-Based Nutrition and Diabetes
To assess aggregative effect size of plant-based nutrition and diabetes, three individual studies were used yielding three effect sizes. These effects were based on random control trial designs in which individuals in a diet group were compared to individuals in a control group. These designs yielded effect size of difference between means. In addition, a single meta-analysis was found which computed Hazard Ratio between plant-based nutrition and diabetes (see Table 4).
Results of meta-analysis (n = 133) showed that the aggregated effect size between plant-based nutrition and diabetes is Cohen’s d = −0.17 (S.E. = 0.06, 95% CI [−0.30, −0.03]) (see Figure 7). When translated to HR = 0.73 (95% CI [0.58, 0.94]. This result is significant χ² (2) = 6.24, p < 0.05 and means that people consuming a plant-based diet at the end of the trial (dietary change to PBD) showed 27% improvement in their diabetic status.
No heterogeneity was found between studies, meaning there are no potential moderators which could bias this effect, Q (2) = 1.06, p = 0.50. Hence, differences between individual studies are not significant and considered as homogeneous (see Figure 8, all studies are within the CI borders).
To conclude, individuals who keep plant-based have decreased risk of diabetes in comparison with individuals who do not keep this type of diet. This result is stronger in when translated to HR = 0.73, in comparison with effect size for of 0.51.¹⁵⁹
5. Vegetarian or Mediterranean Diet and Heart Disease
To assess aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of Healthy diet and heart disease, two individual studies were used yielding two effect sizes. In addition, a single meta-analysis examining this effect was found (see Table 5).
Results of meta-analysis (n = 19,580) showed that the aggregated effect size between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease is HR = 0.86 (HR S.E. = 0.10, 95% CI [0.67,1.06]) (see Figure 9). This result is not significant χ² (1) = 25.10, p = 0.413.
These effects were homogenous between two studies, meaning, studies included in this analysis were not different by methodological aspects which could bias the aggregated effect, Q (1) = 3.34, p = 0.07 (see Figure 10).
To conclude, a vegetarian or Mediterranean diet was not found to decrease probability for heart disease. Although non-significant, effect size found in this meta-analysis is similar to effect size received by Kwok et al.¹⁶² (HR = 0.84). They come to the conclusion that there is modest cardiovascular benefit, but no clear reduction in overall mortality associated with a vegetarian diet.
A vegetarian diet can be healthy or not, depending on the foods consumed in this diet. A vegetarian diet that is rich in processed foods, or a Mediterranean diet that has high quantities of meat and dairy products will not produce the health effects desired. Furthermore, only two studies were found that met all the criteria for inclusion.
6. IGF-1 and Cancer
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is a protein produced in the liver, encoded by the IGF-1 gene which stimulates growth in cells throughout the body. Protein intake increases IGF-1 levels in humans under age 65, independent of total calorie consumption.
IGF-1 has a role in regulating lifespan by controlling longevity in mammals and resisting oxidative stress, a known determinant of aging. IGF-1 also plays a role in assisting growth hormones in their anabolic function. It plays several roles in human physiology including tissue growth and development, especially at a young age where it promotes growth in children and ensures that they grow tall.¹⁶³ IGF-1 is also found in breast milk.
Research shows that IGF-1 continues to have anabolic effects as the person gets older where increased levels of IGF-1 seem to have several adverse effects on health, as people reach adulthood and age.
Studies have implicated IGF-1 with a few forms of cancer including colon, pancreas, endometrium, prostate, breast, lung, and colorectal cancer,¹⁶⁴^-¹⁷⁴ as IGF-1 exerts strong mitogenic actions and triggers a signaling cascade leading to increased proliferation and differentiation of cells and has an anti-apoptotic effect. Certain drug companies are working on medications that reduce the level of IGF-1 in a means to protect from cancer.¹⁷⁵ However, there is no definitive association between IGF-1 and cancer in the Japanese population.¹⁸³^,¹⁸⁴ This may be due to the fact that IGF-1 which can also be attained through the diet, is not found in foods regularly consumed as part of the Japanese diet. When examining dairy products and the Japanese population, we will see the same results as with the rest of the population.¹⁸⁵
Epidemiological evidence shows that dairy food consumption significantly increases circulating IGF-1 levels, and dairy consumption after the weaning period maintains high levels of IGF-1 signaling.¹⁷⁶^-¹⁸¹ A study showed that when insulin-like growth factor-1 is taken in through the diet, further to the added exogenous dose of IGF-1 in the body, there is also increased stimulation of IGF-1 production in the body,¹⁸² which promotes the proliferation of certain cancers.
To assess the aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of dairy products (IGF-1) and cancer, thirteen individual studies were used yielding thirteen effect sizes.¹⁶⁴^,¹⁶⁶^-¹⁶⁹^,¹⁷¹^,¹⁸¹^,¹⁸³^,¹⁸⁶^-¹⁹⁰ In addition, a single meta-analysis examining this effect was found (see Table 6).¹⁹¹
Results of meta-analysis (n = 26,909) of these studies showed that the aggregated effect size between IGF-1 and cancer is HR = 1.48 (HR S.E. = 0.09, 95% CI [1.31,1.65]) (see Figure 11). This result is significant χ² (12) = 914.23, p < 0.001 and means that people consuming high IGF-1 products (dairy products) at any time point during the study period were 48% more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than people that were not consuming a high IGF-1 diet, and we are 95% confident that the true value is lying between 31%-65% (we are 95% sure that people consuming dairy are between 31% and 65% more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than people consuming a low/no dairy diet).
A significant heterogeneity was found between studies, meaning that the studies included in this analysis are different by several methodological aspects which could bias the aggregated effect, Q (12) = 25.67, p < 0.01. Hence, differences between individual studies are significant and considered heterogeneous (see Figures 11 and 12, result of Annekatrin et al.,¹⁶⁶ exceeds CI borders).
To conclude, high IGF-1 levels were found to increase probability for cancer diagnosis by about 48% in comparison with patients with low IGF-1 levels. This finding was larger in comparison with effect size derived from the meta-analysis of Shi et al.¹⁹¹ (HR = 1.05). This suggests that reduced dairy product consumption will lead improved health in the long term.

Table 1. Individual studies evaluating HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Study	Total sample	Total death cases	Follow-up (years)	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Pan et al., 2012¹⁴⁰	121,342	23,926	28	1.13	1.07	1.2	36.11
2. Sinha et al., 2009 (men)¹⁴¹	322,263	47,976	10	1.22	1.16	1.29	36.11
3. Sinha et al., 2009 (women)¹⁴¹	223,390	23,276	10	1.20	1.12	1.3	27.79
Total	666,995	95,178		1.18
Meta analyses
4. Wang et al., 2015¹⁴²	1,493,646	150,328		1.15	1.11	1.18
5. Larsson & Orsini, 2013¹⁴³	1,320,980	135,601		1.10	0.98	1.22

Figure 1. Forest plot of HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Figure 2. Radial plot of HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Table 2. Individual studies evaluating HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Study	Total sample	Total death cases	Follow-up (years)	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Orlich et al., 2013¹⁴⁴	96,469	2,570	5	0.88	0.80	0.97	25.09
2. Key et al., 1999¹⁴⁵	76,172	8,330	10	0.76	0.62	0.94	18.05
3. Fraser, 1999¹⁴⁶	34,192	-	6	0.80	0.74	0.87	27.37
4. Kim, Caulfield, & Rebholz, 2018¹⁴⁷	11,879	2,228	6	0.95	0.91	0.98	29.47
Total	218,712	13,128

Figure 3. Forrest plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Figure 4. Radial plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Table 3. Individual studies evaluating HR between fiber diet and mortality.

Study	Total sample	Total death cases	Follow-up (years)	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Park et al., 2011¹⁴⁸	567,169	31,456	9	0.78	0.73	0.82	22.14
2. Chan & Lee, 2016¹⁴⁹	15,740	3,164	6	0.87	0.79	0.97	17.54
3. Dominguez et al., 2018¹⁵⁰	19,703	323	10.1	0.91	0.84	0.99	19.06
4. Huang et al., 2015¹⁵¹	367,442	46,067	14	0.78	0.76	0.80	26.07
5. Buil-Cosiales, et al., 2014¹⁵²	7,216	425	8.7	0.63	0.46	0.86	7.90
6. Xu et al., 2014¹⁵³	1,110	300	10	0.66	0.48	0.91	7.29
Total	978,380	81,735
Meta analyses
7. Kim & Je, 2016¹⁵⁴	1,409,014	45,078	-	0.77	0.71	0.84	-
8. Yang et al., 2015¹⁵⁵	982,411	67,260	-	0.84	0.80	0.87	-

Figure 5. Forest plot of HR between a high fiber diet and mortality.

Figure 6. Radial plot of HR between a high fiber diet and mortality.

Table 4. Individual studies evaluating Effect size between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Study	Cases in vegan diet	Cases in non-vegan diet	Cohen’s d	95% CI - Lower	95% CI - Upper
1. BARNARD et al., 2006¹⁵⁶	21/49	13/50	−0.32	−0.57	−0.07
2. Kahleova et al., 2018¹⁵⁷	38	37	−1.0	−1.2	−0.8
3. Lee et al., 2016¹⁵⁸	46 −0.5 SD 0.8	47 −0.2 SD 0.7	−0.40	−0.65	−0.15
Total	133	134

Meta analyses	Total sample	Total diabetes cases	HR	HR 95% CI – Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	-
4. Tonstad et al., 2009¹⁵⁹	60,903	3,430	0.51	0.40	0.66

Figure 7. Forest plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Figure 8. Radial plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Table 5. Individual studies evaluating HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Study	Total sample	Total heart disease cases	Follow-up (years)	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Li et al., 2013¹⁶⁰	4,098	1,133	-	0.73	0.51	1.04	36.54
2. Stewart et al., 2016¹⁶¹	15,482	2,885	3.7	0.94	0.89	0.99	64.36
Total	19,580	4,018		1.18
Meta analyses
3. Kwok et al., 2014¹⁶²	183,321	-	-	0.84	0.74	0.96	-

Figure 9. Forest plot of HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Figure 10. Radial plot of HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Table 6. Individual studies evaluating HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Study	Control	Cancer cases	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Endogenous Hormones, T. E., & Breast Cancer Collaborative Group, 2010¹⁹⁰	9,428	4,790	1.28	1.14	1.44	17.28
2. Gunter et al., 2009¹⁸⁹	841	810	1.46	1.00	2.13	8.09
3. Annekatrin et al., 2002¹⁶⁶	263	132	4.97	1.22	20.2	8.72
4. Renehan et al., 2000¹⁶⁴	293	52	3.05	2.04	4.57	0.21
5. Renehan et al., 2004¹⁶⁷	7137	3609	1.49	1.14	1.95	2.51
6. Rinaldi et al., 2010¹⁷¹	1121	1121	1.43	1.13	1.93	10.72
7. Roddam et al., 2008¹⁶⁹	5200	3700	1.38	1.16	1.60	12.21
8. Allen et al., 2007¹⁶⁸	630	630	1.39	1.02	1.89	14.77
9. Mikami et al., 2009¹⁸³	302	101	1.01	0.49	2.10	10.2
10. Spitz et al., 2002¹⁸⁸	297	297	2.21	0.35	12.84	6.98
11. Major et al., 2010¹⁸¹	559	74	1.61	1.28	2.02	5.13
12. Hankinson et al., 1998¹⁸⁶	620	397	2.33	1.06	5.16	3.23
13. Yu et al., 1999¹⁸⁷	218	204	2.06	1.19	3.56	17.28
Total	26,909	15,917
Meta analyses
14. Shi et al., 2004¹⁹¹	6030-1017	30-397	1.05	0.94	1.17

Figure 11. Forest plot of HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Figure 12. Radial plot of HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Meat consumption and diabetes

To assess aggregative Hazard Ratio (HR) of meat consumption and diabetes, two individual studies were used yielding 3 effect sizes (see Table 7).

Table 7. Individual studies evaluating HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

Study	Total sample	Total Diabetes cases	Follow-up (years)	HR	HR 95% CI - Lower	HR 95% CI - Upper	Weight in meta-analysis
1. Pan et al., 2013²¹⁷	149,143	7,540	16-20	1.99	1.53	2.58	46.38
2. Pan et al., 2011²¹⁶	204,157	13,759	-	1.12	1.08	1.16	53.62
Total	353,300	21,299
Meta analyses
3. Aune, Ursin & Veierod, 2009²¹⁸				1.17	0.92	1.48
4. Micha et al., 2011²¹⁹	1,218,380	10,797	-	1.16	0.92	1.46	-

Results of meta-analysis of these studies (n = 353,300) showed that the aggregated effect size between meat consumption and diabetes is HR = 1.52 (HR S.E. = 0.43, 95% CI [1.17, 2.37]) (see Figure 13). This result is significant χ² (1) = 3194.10, p < 0.001.

Figure 13. Forrest plot of HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

A significant heterogeneity was found between two studies, meaning, studies included in this analysis are different by several methodological aspects which could bias the aggregated effect, Q (1) = 13.61, p < 0.01 (see Figure 14, results of Pan et al.,²¹⁶ exceeds CI borders).

Figure 14. Radial plot of HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

To conclude, meat consumption significantly increases probability for diabetes by about 50% on average, in comparison with vegetarian nutrition. This effect size is larger in comparison with effect size received by Aune et al.²¹⁸ (HR = 1.17), and by Micha et al.²¹⁹ (HR = 1.16).

Results

The results from these meta-analyses presented, which involved 2,264,009 people (9,600,738 including previous meta-analyses for which there may be overlap), of which 220,906 (734,711 including previous meta-analyses for which there may be overlap) became sick or died during the studies, aimed to assess aggregate effect sizes of several nutrition types with both mortality and diseases.

To conclude, all meta-analyses conducted to assess mortality showed highly significant results. Specifically, meat consumption increased mortality probability by 18% on average, a plant-based diet and a high fiber diet decreased mortality in 15% and 20% respectively. In addition, dietary diary consumption (as measured by IGF-1) was found to increase probability for cancer by about 48%, while plant-based nutrition reduced diabetes by about 27% and meat consumption increased probability for diabetes by about 50% on average. No significant effects were indicated for meat consumption or vegetarian or Mediterranean diet on diabetes or heart disease (see Table 8).

Table 8. Aggregate Effect Sizes for Meta-Analyses.

	Aggregate effect size	95% CI - Lower	95% CI - Upper	Significant
Mortality
Meat consumption and mortality	1.18	1.12	1.24	Yes
Plant-based nutrition and mortality	0.85	0.77	0.95	Yes
High fiber diet and mortality	0.80	0.74	0.86	Yes
Disease
Vegetarian/Mediterranean diet and heart disease	0.86	0.67	1.06	No
IGF1 and cancer	1.48	1.31	1.65	Yes
Plant-based nutrition and diabetes	0.73	0.58	0.94	Yes
Meat consumption and diabetes	1.52	1.17	2.37	Yes

The possible limitations of these meta-analysis should be taken into consideration. Although the combination of results from different studies will increase statistical power in detecting significant associations because of the increased sample size, however, this often results in heterogeneity. Heterogeneity is expected as the studies took place in different geographic locations, used different dietary assessment methods, and included participants who are in different gender and age groups. In general, there was significant heterogeneity in many of the meta-analyses, as can be seen in the redial plots.

Publication bias is another concern. The statistical tests did not suggest the presence of publication bias in these meta-analyses, although some may have had limited statistical power due to the sometime low number of studies, but on the other hand, very large numbers of participants do reduce this bias.

Completely ruling out the possibility of residual confounding or a temporal bias cannot be done, but if the associations found are real, then it is safe to say that a whole food plant-based diet can reduce the risk for common diseases and increase longevity.

Summary

The evidence from this research component suggests that the most suitable diet for human consumption for health and longevity is a natural, whole food, high-fiber and 90+% plant-based diet, with small amounts of lean meat if desired. This diet leads to health for our species, reducing the need for and costs of healthcare, especially for the growing elderly population.

In order to produce change and have more of the population follow this type of diet, governments and individuals need practical methods and health policies that improve health, with a smaller carbon footprint.

The consumption of animal products not only influences personal health, but also environmental health. The current situation shows that the rearing of livestock and meat consumption on a commodity-basis, accounts for the highest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, respectively, producing 41% and 20% of the sector’s overall GHG output.¹⁹² Rearing of livestock is also the single greatest anthropogenic source of methane, a GHG about 25 times more powerful at trapping heat in the atmosphere than CO₂, (from raising cattle for food) and nitrous oxide emissions (from fertilizer and manure usage), two very potent GHGs.

Rearing of livestock is responsible for approximately 37% of anthropogenic methane emissions and approximately 65% of human nitrous oxide emissions globally.¹⁹³

Furthermore, animal agriculture is a notable contributor to global warming due to the quantities of fossil fuels used, together with deforestation. Worldwide, energy from fossil fuels are responsible for 40% of human GHG emissions, which does not include deforestation at about 18%, and animal agriculture 18%. In fact, most deforestation is done for the purpose of rearing animals and to expand pastures and arable land used to grow crops for feeding livestock. Thus, of the 91-97% human induced GHG emissions, 60% is due to animal agriculture.

Manufacturing beef demands significantly higher resources. Beef production needs 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water than the production of chicken or pork. Furthermore, producing beef releases four times more GHGs than the same amount of pork on a calorie basis, and five times more than poultry.¹⁹⁴

The consumption of plant-based foods produces very low GHG emissions.¹⁹⁵ It is more economical to grow crops for food than to grow crops for animal feed, necessitating the build-up of muscle mass and bone tissue.

Overall, the goal of agriculture and governments must be to build a sustainable future and to support the health of the population. This means finding solutions that will continue to meet human food and energy requirements in cheap, safe, and high-quality ways even for a growing human population, while leaving little or no negative effects on our planet, along with disease control and caring for animal welfare, in a way that is profitable for the farmer.

Policies for change

To ensure that every person on the planet would be able to meet their nutritional needs in the future, we would need to (1) build stable national relationships between different countries for consistent import and export of agricultural goods for food security, (2) establish domestic and global policies including meat and dairy taxes to be implemented to ensure that a price is paid for the destruction of the earth and its resources, and (3) make agricultural policies and trade rules compatible with global food security and sustainability.

We also need to improve dietary habits. The number of men and women existing in sub-optimum health is a dramatic 95% of the global population, and this number is estimated to grow in the upcoming years.¹⁹⁶^-¹⁹⁸

If there is no change in prevailing dietary habit trends, GHG emissions in 2050 connected with food systems will rise by 51% compared with current levels.

If the global population followed a 90% plant-based diet, with meat and animal products forming 10% of the diet, GHG emissions would decrease by 55%. These statistics show a clear and simple way to effect change. By reducing meat and dairy products from the diet to twice a week and changing the composition of the common diet to mostly vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts and legumes, we can immensely influence global GHG emissions, slow deforestation, and prevent many diseases.

Governments and civil society are profoundly unwilling to intrude into people’s diets and tell them what to eat. But we will soon understand that this is the only way to go.

Although reducing overall meat and dairy product consumption will help, the type of meat chosen also has an immense effect on our planet and the future of food. Some animal products are more sustainably produced than others. A way of comparing species is to look at how efficiently an animal converts feed into biomass for human nutrition.

One needs only 1.1 kg of pellet food to get 1 kg of fish meat.¹⁹⁹^-²⁰¹

Chickens also use feed efficiently, where 1.7 kg of feed produces 1 kg of chicken because they are grown quickly and slaughtered at a young age.

By comparison, 2.9 kg of feed is needed for the making of 1 kg of pig meat, and 6.8 kg of feed is needed for the making of 1 kg of cow meat.

A reduction in animal consumption would have major effects on life on Earth:

• Of the available 12 billion acres of agricultural land available on earth, 68% is currently used for livestock.²⁰² Some of this land could be restored for grasslands and forests, to help capture carbon further reducing carbon emissions or be diverted to growing plants for human consumption.
• People previously involved in the livestock industry, (about one-seventh of the global population), would require help making the shift towards a different career, whether in plant-based agriculture, in reforestation, in the biofuel industry from the byproducts of crops now used as food for livestock, or in caring for the animals (re) introduced into the wild or into sanctuaries and zoos.
• About one-third of the planet's land is arid to semi-arid rangeland only able to support livestock agriculture. In these areas, land could be used to house the growing African population, for vertical farming facilities, for growing native trees found to be of medicinal value (e.g., moringa or shea) and for growing livestock for wool for populations such as the Mongols and Berbers, who would otherwise lose their cultural identity, causing them to settle permanently in cities or towns. Solar farms could also be located on this land, providing sustainable sources of energy to local communities.

Apart from the myriad reasons to lower meat consumption, meat has an important role in tradition and cultural identity. Giving up meat has impact on the culture of many societies, so governments and people have personally failed to reduce meat consumption.

This indifference can be combated by increasing the price of meat so that farmers can raise fewer animals and earn the same. This shift in production would make meat take the form of a treat rather than a staple food, as it is today.

Governments can subsidize fresh vegetables and fruits, making them more affordable and more widely accessible to all populations, instead of subsidizing meat and dairy products.

The environmental issue may also be solved with meat coming from the use of technology, such as lab-grown meat and fish.²⁰³^-²⁰⁵

The current problem is that newly rich societies are increasing their demand for animal products. As people’s incomes increase, they start buying more dairy, poultry and meat and fish.

Therefore, to improve people’s eating habits, a whole food mostly plant-based diet should be encouraged and taught in schools including medical school. Just as teaching first aid is common practice all over the world, the same should be done with regard to plant-based food choices.

Discussion

As we see, food choices are very dependent on prices, and can therefore be influenced by prices.

Difficulties also arise in making healthy food choices in food swamps, where affordable, fresh and healthy foods are accessible, but where there is an overabundance of energy dense, low-nutrient foods as well. Here, unhealthy food choices are much easier to make than healthy food choice, due to their cheaper prices. This is where education is critical.

Sugar taxes

Since sodas are not a necessary element of a wholesome diet, soda is a welcome candidate for taxation. We see that if a tax of about 20% is introduced, it has a serious effect on the buying behavior of consumers producing many health benefits.

In Mexico, a sugar tax on soft drinks has been successful due to the fact that the funds were spent providing free drinking water in schools.²⁰⁶^-²⁰⁸

Meat and dairy taxes

The price of animal products must match their real cost to society, including their carbon footprint. A meat tax puts a specific price on the harm they cause the environment. Currently, there are no consequences for the raising of livestock, even though these industries are proven to be detrimental to health and the environment. There must be a financial deterrent such as taxes, fines, or penalties to discourage their production and usage. To date, no economic incentives are in place for industries or individuals to move away from the generation and consumption of animal goods. Taxing meat and dairy products will put economic pressure on people and these industries to make change.

People will still buy meat, but more as a treat rather than as a staple.

A meat tax will lead to a major reduction in GHG emissions and preserve over 500,000 lives per year through healthier diets.

If we add a 35% meat and dairy tax and encourage sellers to sell meat and dairy products at 50% higher prices, people will make different choices.

In developing countries, the principal nutritional problem is malnutrition; however, there would not be malnutrition if the abundance of grains that readily grow in third-world countries, often located around the equator ±30 degrees, were consumed in their whole version, including the bran and germ layers, as mentioned. When these whole grains are consumed together with legumes that also readily grow in these locations, there is no issue of malnutrition. When adding some nuts and fruits (such as dates, figs) and leafy vegetables, all available in these locations, nutritional needs are met without the need for animal products. Furthermore, most people from these countries do not suffer from common vitamin D deficiency due to the extended sunlight hours with UVB radiation. Iodine which may lack in their diets, can be added to salt. Soy milk which can be easily produced in these countries can also be fortified with vitamins and minerals that may be lacking, such as vitamin B12.

The major problem in developing countries is the need for better infrastructure to produce and distribute sufficient foods economically so as to provide profit for the people. Currently, refined grains, sugar, and processed foods from developed countries are sold to developing countries cheaply, even cheaper than producing or buying local healthy whole foods, leading to malnutrition. When infrastructure improves, there will be increased local food production and consumption, preventing malnutrition in the future in these regions.

However, food security for a country does not require a nation to be food self-sufficient. Agricultural goods are susceptible to climatic, soil, topographic, and other conditions that differ globally.

Nations can import produce that is not easily grown within their region. Also, countries with fertile agriculture may only be self-sufficient for some food products. Assurance of adequate food supplies around the world may be achieved through reliance on native production and imports. The globalization of food markets is crucial in ensuring a food-secure future for everyone.

Although it may appear contradictory that a nation is more likely to achieve food security by exporting some of its local food production to the global market than by consuming it all domestically, this is a very good system for acquiring food security for everyone globally.

Various food is better grown in different countries, and in times of crisis, these relationships can support a country’s food supply. Governments should promote domestic production while encouraging imports and exports because food importation requires a nation to have exportable products to gain the necessary foreign exchange to pay for the imports.

For example, a low-income country can supplement domestic whole-grain rice and banana production with imports funded by exports of excess grains and bananas. Foreign exchange is vital for food security because if a country cannot earn enough foreign exchange income from its exports (industrial goods, agricultural or mining commodities, services), it may be unable to import specific foods to help accomplish national food security.

Food stamps:

For 40 years, the food stamps program has been a very significant domestic hunger safety net that helps provide economic well-being, access to proper nutrition, food security and accessibility, and a reduction of child poverty and money for food spending that benefits those most in need. Food stamps are also good for the economy.²⁰⁹

There is one major drawback of such programs, namely the foods they include.

People can use food stamps to purchase any food item for human consumption, including candy, soft drinks, ice-cream, crackers, cookies, and cakes.²¹⁰

Food stamp policy should change to allow the purchase of only natural foods, without options for foods that are the leading causes of illness and chronic diseases.

Food stamps can thus help guide populations using them towards making healthy food choices by default. In this way, the government will target the poorest, most needy families first and this will lead the way for agriculture to follow suit.

Subsidies

In the current US food pyramid, (see Figure 15), the USDA suggests that meat, poultry, fish, eggs and legumes together should comprise 10% of our diet and that dairy products should comprise 23% of our diet. When putting these foods together and reducing intake of legumes, the pyramid suggest we should be consuming about 30% of our calories from animal-based products.²¹¹^,²¹² However, the meat and dairy industries get 74% of USDA subsidies. Vegetables and fruits, according to the USDA food pyramid, are to form 38% of total calories. However, these industries get under 1% of the subsidies.²¹³

Figure 15. The distribution of foods in the current USDA food pyramid.

Grains receive 13% of subsidies, with most going to feed livestock; sugar, oil, starch and alcohol, 11%; nuts and legumes, 1.9%; and fruits and vegetables, 0.4% of subsidies.

In order to improve health, subsidies should become more similar in percentages to the USDA’s tiers in the food pyramid.

The Recommended Food Pyramid Based on This Research:

According to this research into the ideal diet for humans the optimal food pyramid would reflect the following breakdown (see Figure 16):

• grain consumption (27%), recommending that all grains should be consumed as whole grains.
• vegetables (26%), highlighting a variety of dark green vegetables, as well as root vegetables.
• legumes (20-25%), peas, lentils and beans, and their spreads.
• fruits (15%), emphasizing variety and deemphasizing fruit juices.
• meat (0-7%), emphasizing lean meats such as fish, and chicken.
• milk (0%), a category that includes fluid milk and many other milk-based products should be avoided.
• oils, nuts, seeds (5-7%), recommending nuts and seeds and their pastes as sandwich toppings.
• honey, emphasizing whole natural honey (0-0.5%).

Figure 16. The distribution of foods in the recommended food pyramid.

Carbohydrates should form 64% of the diet, or 1280 kcal of energy/day on a 2000 kcal/day diet (320 grams), and should come from whole grains, fruits, and vegetables and partly from legumes.

Overall protein for a person with moderate physical activity should form 11% of the diet or 220 kcals on a 2000 kcal/day diet (59 grams) and should come from legumes and meat if consumed, and partly from seeds and nuts.

Overall fats should form 25% of the diet or 500 kcals/day on a 2000 kcal/day diet (55 grams) from seeds, nuts, and partly from leafy green vegetables, sea vegetables, and vegetable oils.

People’s energy (caloric) needs are generally determined by their metabolic rate, which depends on gender, age, weight, body composition, genetics, and activity level. Except for physical activity levels, the differences in nutritional needs between people are slight. However, climate extremes will affect dietary needs. There is an inverse relationship between local temperature and energy needs per day, with higher caloric needs for people living in colder environments. In cold locations, there is also slight preferred fat oxidation, so although protein intake need not change at colder temperatures, fat intake should be slightly higher at the expense of carbohydrates in a way that carbohydrate-rich foods form 50% of energy intake, protein 11% and fats up to 39% instead of the common carbohydrates 64%, protein 11% and fats 25%.

To conclude, a whole-food, high-fiber, plant-based diet consisting mainly of whole grains (for example, wheat, rice, oats, barley rye, spelt, quinoa, kamut, teff, sorghum, millet, etc.), legumes (for example various beans, peas, lentils, and peanuts), USOs (for example, potatoes, sweet potatoes, cassava, beets, radishes, yams, taro, ginger, and onions), nuts (for example, almonds, cashews, Brazil nuts, walnuts, pistachios, hazelnuts, pecans, and pine nuts), seeds (for example, chia, flax, sesame, pumpkin, and watermelon), vegetables and fruits, with reduced quantities of meat and dairy products has been statistically proven to not only prevent most modern-day diseases but also to reverse them while supporting the growing population healthily and sustainably.

Individuals and governments should aim to use this knowledge through policies, to feed the growing global population in a healthy and sustainable way without causing further environmental destruction.

Without government intervention in eating habits, there will be many potential limitations to these suggestions in terms of geographical representation and applicability of the findings to different populations, such as poorer populations.

Firstly, the availability and affordability of plant-based foods currently vary significantly across different geographical regions. For example, fresh produce may be less readily available and more expensive in colder locations, making it more difficult for individuals to follow a plant-based diet without the support of governments. Additionally, some regions may have a cultural or traditional preference for animal-based foods, making it challenging for individuals to transition to a plant-based diet without government intervention with pricing.

Secondly, poorer populations may have limited access to various nutrient-dense plant-based foods due to limited availability, affordability, and lack of resources without government intervention. This can increase the risk of malnutrition and other health problems in these populations. Therefore government intervention is critical in making the transition to a healthier diet.

In developed countries, interventions can include increased income-earning opportunities, changes in the food pyramid, meat, dairy, and sugar taxes, a change in food stamp guidelines, subsidies for fruits and vegetables, support for excess food sharing, supermarket availability for all communities, and school feeding and education programs in all countries. In developing countries, this effort could include support for local markets, improved infrastructure, secured purchasing power through governmental prevention of price fluctuations, securing land ownership, easier access to credit, knowledge-sharing through demonstration farms and websites, support for import and export and legal structures supporting private investors.

Conclusions

All meta-analyses conducted to assess mortality showed highly significant results. Specifically, meat consumption increased mortality probability by 18% on average, plant-based diets and fiber-rich diets decreased mortality by 15% and 20%, respectively.

In addition, dairy consumption (as measured by IGF1) was found to increase the probability of cancer by about 50%, while plant-based nutrition reduced diabetes by about 27%.

To conclude the findings, a whole-food, high-fiber, plant-based diet consisting mainly of whole grains, legumes, USOs, nuts, seeds, and fruits, with reduced quantities of meat and dairy products, has been statistically proven to prevent most modern-day diseases while supporting the growing population healthily and sustainably.

Individuals and governments should use this knowledge and begin the process of change to support, through policies, the feeding of the growing global population healthily and sustainably without causing further environmental destruction. Future research should examine different aspects of whole food plant-based diets and their effects on health and mortality, such as nut and seed consumption and disease. Also, research into dietary recommendation strategies is necessary to translate the findings of this study to influence a wider population.

Glossary of terms

Z Statistic, standardized score that indicates a higher probability for a significant result; Hazard ratio (log), the ratio of the hazard rates corresponding to the conditions described by two levels of an explanatory variable that explain the outcome in survival analysis; Forest plot, a graphical display of estimated results from a number of scientific studies addressing the same correlation in a meta-analysis. The forest plot depicts the relationship between an independent variable and the outcome across several similar correlations; Radial plot, a graphical display of heterogeneity in the data in a meta-analytic context. For a fixed-effects model, the plot shows the inverse of the standard errors (1/standard error) on the horizontal axis against the observed effect sizes or outcomes standardized by their corresponding standard errors on the vertical axis.

Data availability statement

Underlying data

Open Science Framework: Manuscript - The Ideal Diet for Humans. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/64NAM.²¹⁵

This project contains the following underlying data:

• Research Findings Galit Goldfarb.pdf (the search strategy and results)

Reporting guidelines

The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement openly available in Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/64NAM.

This repository includes the following files:

• PRISMA 2009 flow diagram Galit Goldfarb.pdf
• PRISMA 2009 checklist.pdf

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables (ST/ESA/SER.A/399). 2017. Publisher Full Text
2. World resources report 2013–14: InterIm FIndIngs. Creating a Sustainable Food Future; A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. 2014.
3. Eswaran H, Lal R, Reich PF: Land Degradation: An Overview. Responses to Land Degradation.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Land Degradation and Desertification, Khon Kaen:Oxford Press;2001.
4. Bindoff NL, Stott PA, AchutaRao KM, et al.: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional.In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.;2013.
5. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO: The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017.Building resilience for peace and food security.Rome:FAO;2017.
6. Holleman C, Jackson J, Sánchez MV, et al.: Sowing the seeds of peace for food security - Disentangling the nexus between conflict, food security and peace, FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study 2. Rome:FAO; 2017, 95 pp.
7. The Lancet: Over 95% of the world’s population has health problems, with over a third having more than five ailments. ScienceDaily.2015, June 8.
8. Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators: Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995): 743–800.
9. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al.: Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Lancet.2019 Feb 2; 393(10170): 447–92. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):530. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2590. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Feb 1;395(10221):338. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):e56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. Domínguez-Rodrigo M: Is the ‘Savanna Hypothesis’ a Dead Concept for Explaining the Emergence of the Earliest Hominins?. Curr. Anthropol. 2014; 55(1): 59–81. JSTOR, JSTOR. Reference Source
11. US history.org, Ancient civilisations, prehistoric times:2019. http://www.ushistory.org/civ/2.asp
12. Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, et al.: A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad. Central Africa. Nature. 2002; 418: 145–51. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
13. Schoenemann PT: A Companion to Paleoanthropology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.;2013; vol. 8. : 136–64. 1st ed: Publisher Full Text Reference Source
14. Folger T: The Naked and the Bipedal. Discover Mag. 1993; 14(11): 34–5.
15. Nestle M: Animal vs plant foods in human diets and health: is the historical record unequivocal?. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999; 58: 211–8. Publisher Full Text
16. Grine FE, Sponheimer M, Ungar PS, et al.: Dental microwear and stable isotopes inform the paleoecology of extinct hominins. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2012; 148: 285–317. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
17. Vincent AS: Plant foods in savanna environments: a preliminary report of tubers eaten by the Hadza of Northern Tanzania. World Archaeol. 1985; 17: 131–48. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. Yeakel JD, Bennett NC, Koch PL, et al.: The isotopic ecology of African mole rats informs hypotheses on the evolution of human diet. Proc R Soc Biol. 2007; 274: 1723–30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
19. Cerling TE: Development of grasslands and savannas in East Africa during the Neogene. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1992; 97: 241–7. Publisher Full Text
20. Lee-Thorp J, Likius A, Mackaye HT, et al.: Isotopic evidence for an early shift to C4 resources by Pliocene hominins in Chad. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20369–72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
21. Oelze VM, Fuller BT, Richards MP, et al.: Exploring the contribution and significance of animal protein in the diet of bonobos by stable isotope ratio analysis of hair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 9792–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
22. Dominy NJ: Hominins living on the sedge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20171–2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
23. Lee-Thorp J, Likius A, Mackaye HT, et al.: Isotopic evidence for an early shift to C4 resources by Pliocene hominins in Chad. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20369–72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
24. Zink KD, Lieberman DE, Lucas PW: Food material properties and early hominin processing techniques. J. Hum. Evol. 2014; 77: 155–66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
25. Organ C, Nunn CL, Machanda Z, et al.: Phylogenetic rate shifts in feeding time during the evolution of Homo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 14555–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
26. Anton SC, Potts R, Aiello LC: Human evolution – Evolution of early Homo: an integrated biological perspective.2014; 345(6192): 1236828. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
27. Pilbeam D, Gould SJ: Size and Scaling in Human Evolution. Science. 1974; 186(186): 892–901. Publisher Full Text
28. Oelze VM, Fuller BT, Richards MP, et al.: Exploring the contribution and significance of animal protein in the diet of bonobos by stable isotope ratio analysis of hair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 9792–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
29. Laden G, Wrangham R: The rise of the hominids as an adaptive shift in fallback foods: Plant underground storage organs (USOs) and australopith origins. J. Hum. Evol. 2005 Oct; 49(4): 482–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
30. Wood BA: Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature. 1992; 355: 783–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
31. Wood BA: Early Homo. How many species?:Kimbel WH, Martin LB, editors. Species, species concepts, and primate evolution. New York:Plenum Press:1993; p. 485–522. Publisher Full Text
32. Calvin WH: A brief history of the mind: From apes to intellect and beyond. Oxford:Oxford University Press;2005.
33. Calvin WH: The Evolution of Human Minds.2007. Reference Source
34. Roach NT, Venkadesan M, Rainbow MJ, et al.: Elastic energy storage in the shoulder and the evolution of high-speed throwing in Homo. Nature. 2013; 498: 483–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
35. Stefansson V: Rabbit Starvation, high protein and high fat diets.1927. Reference Source
36. Bilsborough S, Mann N: A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2006; 16(2): 129–52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
37. Speth JD: The Paleoanthropology and Archaeology of Big-Game Hunting: Protein, Fat, or Politics?. New York:Springer;2012.
38. Ledger HP: Body composition as a basis for a comparative study of some East African mammals. Symp Zool Soc. 1968; 21: 289–310.
39. Burton RF: The Lake Regions of Central Africa, A Picture of Exploration. Cambridge:Forgotten Books;1860. Publisher Full Text
40. Wrangham R, Conklin-Brittain N: Cooking as a biological trait. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2003; 136(1): 35–46. Publisher Full Text
41. Wrangham R: Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York:Basic Books;2009.
42. Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC, Wood B, et al.: Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 2014 Jun; 71: 119–28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
43. Marlowe FW: The Hadza: Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania. Berkeley:University of California Press;2010.
44. Lee RB: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Daly, Richard Heywood. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press;1999.
45. Crittenden AN: The Importance of Honey Consumption in Human Evolution. Food and Foodways. 2011; 19: 257–73. Publisher Full Text
46. Speth JD: Bison Kills and Bone Counts: Decision Making by Ancient Hunters. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecology. Chicago:University of Chicago;1983.
47. Milton K: A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evolut Anthrop. 1999; 8: 11–21. Publisher Full Text
48. Andrews P, Martin L: Hominoid dietary evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1991; 334: 199–209.
49. Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Office of International Affairs, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press;1996.
50. Noel D: Vietmeyer, Forward. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I. Grains. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press;1996.Reference Source
51. Graves RR, Lupo AC, McCarthy RC, et al.: Just how strapping was KNM-WT 15000?. J. Hum. Evol. 2010; 59(5): 542–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
52. MacLarnon AM: The vertebrate canal.Walker A, Leakey R, editors. The Nariokotome Homo erectus Skeleton. Harvard:Harvard University Press;1993. p. 359–90.
53. Aiello LC, Wheeler P: The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 1995; 36(2): 199–221. Publisher Full Text
54. Ungar PS, Sponheimer M: The diets of early hominins. Science. 2011; 80(334): 190–3.
55. Sponheimer M, Alemseged Z, Cerling TE, et al.: Isotopic evidence of early hominin diets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013; 110: 1–6.
56. Sponheimer M, Lee-Thorp J, de Ruiter D , et al.: Hominins, sedges, and termites: New carbon isotope data from the Sterkfontein valley and Kruger National Park. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 48: 301–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
57. Peters CR, Vogel JC: Africa’s wild C4 plant foods and possible early hominid diets. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 48: 219–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
58. Yeakel JD, Bennett NC, Koch PL, et al.: The isotopic ecology of African mole rats informs hypotheses on the evolution of human diet. Proc R Soc Biol. 2007; 274: 1723–30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
59. Cerling TE, Chritz KL, Jablonski NG, et al.: Diet of Theropithecus from 4 to 1 Ma in Kenya. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013; 110: 10507–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
60. Schoeninger MJ, Moore J, Sept JM: Subsistence strategies of two “savanna” chimpanzee populations: The stable isotope evidence. Am. J. Primatol. 1999; 49: 297–314. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
61. Thavarajah P, Thavarajah D, Vandenberg A: Low phytic acid lentils (Lens culinaris L.): A potential solution for increased micronutrient bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009; 57: 9044–9. Publisher Full Text
62. Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Pina G, Oomah B: Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health. Food Res. Int. 2010; 43: 461–82. Publisher Full Text
63. Singh B, Singh JP, Shevkani K, et al.: Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017; 54(4): 858–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
64. Giusti F, Gaprioli G, Ricciutelli M, et al.: Determination of fourteen polyphenols in pulses by high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and correlation study with antioxidant activity and colour. Food Chem. 2017; 221(221): 689–97. Publisher Full Text
65. Tonstad S, Malik N, Haddad E: A high-fibre bean-rich diet versus a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014; 27(Suppl 2): 109–16. Publisher Full Text
66. Hermsdorff HH, Zulet MA, Abete I, et al.: A legume-based hypocaloric diet reduces proinflammatory status and improves metabolic features in overweight/obese subjects. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011; 50(1): 61–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
67. Chang WC, Wahlqvist ML, Chang HY, et al.: A bean-free diet increases the risk of all-cause mortality among Taiwanese women: the role of metabolic syndrome. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15(4): 663–72,PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
68. Abeysekara S, Chilibeck PD, Vatanparast H, et al.: A pulse-based diet is effective for reducing total and LDL-cholesterol in older adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2012; 108(Suppl 1): S103–S110. Publisher Full Text
69. Garden-Robinson J: Pulses: The Perfect Food Developed for the Northern Pulse Growers Association. Fargo:North Dakota State University Extension Service;2012.
70. Gray PB: The Evolution and Endocrinology of Human Behavior: a Focus on Sex Differences and Reproduction. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press:2010. pp. 277–92.
71. Marlowe FW: Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 2005; 14(2): 54–67. Publisher Full Text
72. Lee RB: Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press;2005.
73. Binford LR: Human ancestors: Changing views of their behavior. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 1986; 3: 235–57.
74. Laden G, Wrangham R: The rise of the hominids as an adaptive shift in fallback foods: Plant underground storage organs (USOs) and australopith origins. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 49(4): 482–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
75. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, et al.: Theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 2000; 9: 156–85. Publisher Full Text
76. Peters CR, O’Brien EM: The early hominid plant food niche: Insights from an analysis of plant exploitation by Homo, Pan, Papio in eastern and southern Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 1981; 22: 127–40. Publisher Full Text
77. Carmody RN, Wrangham RW: The energetic significance of cooking. J. Hum. Evol. 2009; 57: 379–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
78. Wrangham RW, Conklin-Brittain N: Cooking as a biological trait. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2003; 136: 35–46. Publisher Full Text
79. Johns T: The Origins of Human Diet & Medicine. Tucson:The University of Arizona Press;1996.
80. Stahl A: Hominid Dietary Selection Before Fire. Curr. Anthropol. 1984; 25: 151–68. Publisher Full Text
81. Chaudhry M: Green Gold: Value-added pulses. NW:Quantum Media;2011.
82. Tovar J, Nilsson A, Johansson M, et al.: Combining functional features of whole-grain barley and legumes for dietary reduction of cardiometabolic risk: a randomised cross-over intervention in mature women. Br. J. Nutr. 2014 Feb; 111(4): 706–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
83. Thavarajah P, Thavarajah D, Vandenberg A: Low phytic acid lentils (Lens culinaris L.): A potential solution for increased micronutrient bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009; 57: 9044–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
84. Henry AG: Recovering Dietary Information from Extant and Extinct Primates Using Plant Microremains. Int. J. Primatol. 2012; 33: 702–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
85. Sistiaga A, Mallol C, Galván B, et al.: The Neanderthal Meal: A New Perspective Using Faecal Biomarkers. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e101045. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
86. Hardy K, Buckley S, Collins MJ, et al.: Neanderthal medics? Evidence for food, cooking, and medicinal plants entrapped in dental calculus. Naturwissenschaften. 2012; 99(8): 617–26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
87. Lee RB, DeVore L: Man the Hunter Transaction Publishers.1968.
88. Woodburn JC: An introduction to Hadza ecology.Lee RB, DeVore I, editors. Man the hunter. Chicago:Aldlne;1968.
89. Jolly CJ: The Seed-Eaters: A New Model of Hominid Differentiation Based on a Baboon Analogy. Man. 1970; 5(1): 5–26. Publisher Full Text
90. Peters CR, O’Brien EM: The early hominin plant food niche: Insights from an analysis of plant exploitation by Homo, Pan, Papio in eastern and southern Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 1981; 22: 127–40. Publisher Full Text
91. Zilhan AL: Women in Evolution, II. Subsistence and social organisation among early hominids.1978; 4(1): 4–20.
92. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). PNAS. 2011; 108(2): 486–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
93. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108(2): 486–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
94. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Plant foods and the dietary ecology of Neanderthals and early modern humans. J. Hum. Evol. 2014; 69: 44–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
95. Roebroeks W, Villa P: On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011; 108: 5209–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
96. Sandgathea DM, Dibblec HL, Goldberg P, et al.: Timing of the appearance of habitual fire use. PNAS. 2011; 108: E298. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
97. James SR, Dennell RW, Gilbert AS, et al.: Hominid Use of Fire in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene: A Review of the Evidence. Curr. Anthropol. 1989; 30(1): 1–26. Publisher Full Text
98. Wrangham R: Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York:Basic Books;2009.
99. McHenry HM: Human Evolution.Ruse M, Travis J, editors. Evolution: the first four billion years. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press;2009; p. 265. 978-0-674-03175-3.
100. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, et al.: A Theory of Human Life History Evolution: Diet, Intelligence and Longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 2000; 9(4): 156–85. Publisher Full Text
101. Calvin WH: A Brain for All Seasons: Human Evolution and Abrupt Climate Change. Chicago:University of Chicago Press;2003.
102. Calvin WH: The Evolution of Human Minds. Chicago:University of Chicago;2007.
103. McDougall I, Brown FH, Fleagle JG: Fossil Reanalysis Pushes Back Origin of Homo sapiens. Sci. Am. 2005. “Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia”. Nature 433 (7027): 733–736. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..733M. doi:10.1038/nature03258. PMID 15716951. H. sapiens idaltu is a confirmed subspecies, based on 3 craniums dated 0.16 – 0.15 Mya found in Ethiopia (1997/2003).
104. McDougall I, Brown FH, Fleagle JG: Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia. Nature. 2005; 433(7027): 733–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
105. Diamond J: Once upon a time, all the fruits, nuts, and berries our gathering ancestors ate were wild. Someone, at some time, had to come up with the bright idea of crops. Discovery Magazine - Biology and Medicine. September 1994.
106. Cunliffe B: Prehistoric Europe: An Illustrated History. Oxford University Press;1998.
107. American Museum of Natural History: Domestication Timeline.Reference Source
108. The Bradshaw Foundation: 10,000-8,000 years ago.Reference Source
109. Speth JD: Bison Kills and Bone Counts: Decision Making by Ancient Hunters. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecology. Chicago:University of Chicago;1983.
110. Milton K: A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 1999; 8: 11–21. Publisher Full Text
111. Gibbons A: The Evolution of Diet. Nat Geo Mag. 2013.
112. Diamond J: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race. Discover Mag. 1987; 64–6.
113. Hawks J: Selection for smaller brains in Holocene human evolution. John Hawks webblog. Winconsin:Department of Anthropology University of Wisconsin;2011.
114. Cohen MN, Armelagos GJ: Paleopathology and the Origins of Agriculture. London:Academic Press;1984.
115. The Genographic Project: The Development of Agriculture; The Farming Revolution. National Geographic Society;2019.
116. Wessel T: The Agricultural Foundations of Civilization. J Agricult Hum Values. 1984; 1: 9–12. Publisher Full Text
117. Eaton SB, Konner M, Shostak M: Stone agers in the fast lane: Chronic degenrative diseases in evolutionary perspective. Am. J. Med. 1988; 84: 739–49. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
118. Hoyert DL, Xu J: Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2011. Division of Vital Statistics National Vital, Statistics Reports. 2012; 61(6): 1–52.
119. American Heart Association: Statistical Update. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131: e29–322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
120. Freudenheim MPH: Chronic Care in America: A 21st Century Challenge. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University;2004.
121. Prentice T: Health, history and hard choices: Funding dilemmas in a fast-changing world. Global Health Histories. Bloomington:University of Indiana;2006.
122. Anderson G: The Growing Burden of Chronic Disease in American. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119: 263–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
123. Barclay E: National Public Radio - news & analysis. meat consumption. A Nation Of Meat Eaters: See How It All Adds Up. Reference Source
124. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al.: American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131(4): e29–322. Publisher Full Text
125. Williams C: Kwashiorkor. Lancet. 1935; 226(5855): 1151–2. Publisher Full Text
126. Hay WW, Levin MJ, Sondheimer JM:Krebs NF, Primak LE, Hambridge KM, editors.Normal childhood nutrition & its disorders. Current Pediatric Diagnosis & Treatment. New York:McGraw-Hill;2003; 17. : p. 291–2.
127. Donald P, Pitts CC, Pohl SL: Body weight and composition in laboratory rats: effects of diets with high or low protein concentrations. Science. 1981; 211(4478): 185–6.
128. Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ, Tyzbir RS: Mechanisms of thermogenesis induced by low protein diets. Metabol. 1983; 32(3): 257–61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
129. Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ: Influence of carbohydrate and fat intake on diet-induced thermogenesis and brown fat activity in rats fed low protein diets. J. Nutr. 1987; 117(10): 1721–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
130. Stillings BR: World supplies of animal protein.Porter JWG, Rolls BA, editors. Proteins in Human Nutrition. London:Academic Press;1973; p. 11–33.
131. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Beltsville:The Nutrient Data Laboratory;2004. Reference Source
132. Osthoff G, Hugo A, de Wit M : The composition of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) milk. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006; 145(3-4): 265–9. Publisher Full Text
133. World Health Organization: WHO at 70 - working for better health for everyone, everywhere. News release. GENEVA;cited 5 APRIL 2018.Reference Source
134. Wang Y, Lehane C, Ghebremeskel K, et al.: Modern organic and broiler chickens sold for human consumption provide more energy from fat than protein. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Mar; 13(3): 400–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
135. Simopoulos AP: An Increase in the ω-6/ω-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients. 2016; 8(3): 128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
136. Ponnampalam EN, Mann NJ, Sinclair AJ: Effect of feeding systems on omega-3 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts: potential impact on human health. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006; 15(1): 21–9. PubMed Abstract
137. Salque M, Bogucki PI, Pyzel J, et al.: Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe. Nature. 2013; 493: 522–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
138. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al.: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000 Apr 19; 283(15): 2008–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
139. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, et al.: A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 2010 Apr; 1(2): 97–111. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
140. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012; 172(7): 555–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
141. Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, et al.: Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009 Mar 23; 169(6): 562–71. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
142. Wang X, Lin X, Ouyang YY, et al.: Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohortstudies. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr; 19(5): 893–905. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
143. Larsson SC, Orsini N: Red meat and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 1; 179(3): 282–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
144. Orlich MJ, Singh PN, Sabaté J, et al.: Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013; 173: 1230–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
145. Key TJ, Fraser GE, Thorogood M, et al.: Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999 Sep; 70(3 Suppl): 516S–24S. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
146. Fraser GE: Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999 Sep; 70(3 Suppl): 532S–8S. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
147. Kim H, Caulfield LE, Rebholz CM: Healthy Plant-Based Diets Are Associated with Lower Risk of All-Cause Mortality in US Adults. J. Nutr. 2018 Apr 1; 148(4): 624–31. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
148. Park Y, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, et al.: Dietary fiber intake and mortality in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011 Jun 27; 171(12): 1061–8. Epub 2011 Feb 14.Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
149. Chan CW, Lee PH: Association between dietary fibre intake with cancer and all-cause mortality among 15 740 adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2016 Oct; 29(5): 633–42. Publisher Full Text
150. Dominguez LJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Toledo E, et al.: Dietary fiber intake and mortality in a Mediterranean population: the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) project. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018 Oct 26; 58: 3009–22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
151. Huang T, Xu M, Lee A, et al.: Consumption of whole grains and cereal fiber and total and cause-specific mortality: prospective analysis of 367,442 individuals. BMC Med. 2015 Mar 24; 13: 59. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text >Reference Source
152. Buil-Cosiales P, Zazpe I, Toledo E, et al.: Fiber intake and all-cause mortality in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014 Dec; 100(6): 1498–507. Publisher Full Text PubMed Abstract | Reference Source
153. Xu H, Huang X, Risérus U, et al.: Dietary fiber, kidney function, inflammation, and mortality risk. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014 Dec 5; 9(12): 2104–10. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
154. Kim Y, Je Y: Dietary fibre intake and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all cancers: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016 Jan; 109(1): 39–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
155. Yang Y, Zhao LG, Wu QJ, et al.: Association between dietary fiber and lower risk of all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015 Jan 15; 181(2): 83–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
156. Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJ, et al.: A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug; 29(8): 1777–83. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
157. Kahleova H, Tura A, Hill M, et al.: A Plant-Based Dietary Intervention Improves Beta-Cell Function and Insulin Resistance in Overweight Adults: A 16-Week Randomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2018; 10(2):189. Published 2018 Feb 9. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
158. Lee YM, Kim SA, Lee IK, et al.: Effect of a brown rice based vegan diet and conventional diabetic diet on glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12-week randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2; 11(6): e0155918. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
159. Tonstad S, Butler T, Yan R, et al.: Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 May; 32(5): 791–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
160. Li S, Chiuve SE, Flint A, et al.: Better diet quality and decreased mortality among myocardial infarction survivors. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013; 173: 1808–18. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
161. Stewart RA, Wallentin L, Benatar J, et al.: Dietary patterns and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in a global study of high-risk patients with stable coronary heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37(25): 1993–2001. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text PubMed Abstract | Reference Source
162. Kwok CS, Umar S, Myint PK, et al.: Vegetarian diet, Seventh Day Adventists and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014 Oct 20; 176(3): 680–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
163. Laron Z: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1): a growth hormone. Mol. Pathol. 2001 Oct; 54(5): 311–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
164. Renehan AG, et al.: Circulating insulin-like growth factor II and colorectal adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85(9): 3402–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
165. Yu H, Rohan T: Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000 Sep 20; 92(18): 1472–89. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
166. Annekatrin L, et al.: Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2002; 101(6): 549–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
167. Renehan AG, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet. 2004; 363(9418): 1346–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
168. Allen NE, et al.: Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 concentrations and prostate cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007; 16(6): 1121–7. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
169. Roddam AW, et al.: Insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and prostate cancer risk: analysis of individual patient data from 12 prospective studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008; 149(7): 461–71. W83–8. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
170. Key TJ, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(6): 530–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
171. Rinaldi S, et al.: Serum levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and colorectal cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort, plus a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Cancer. 2010; 126(7): 1702–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
172. Clayton PE, Banerjee I, Murray PG, et al.: Growth hormone, the insulin- like growth factor axis, insulin and cancer risk. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011; 7: 11–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
173. Yang Y, Yee D: Targeting insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling in breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2012 Dec; 17(3-4): 251–61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
174. Christopoulos PF, Msaouel P, Koutsilieris M: The role of the insulin-like growth factor-1 system in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2015; 14: 43. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
175. Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008; 8: 915–28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
176. Hoppe C, Molgaard C, Michaelsen KF: Cow's milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2006; 26: 131–73. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
177. Rogers I, Emmett P, Gunnell D, et al.: Milk as a food for growth? The insulin-like growth factors link. Public Health Nutr. 2006 May; 9(3): 359–68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
178. Rich-Edwards JW, Ganmaa D, Pollak MN, et al.: Milk consumption and the prepubertal somatotropic axis. Nutr. J. 2007; 6: 28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
179. Crowe FL, Key TJ, Allen NE, et al.: The association between diet and serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009; 18: 1333–1340. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
180. Qin LQ, He K, Xu JY: Milk consumption and circulating insulin-like growth factor-I level: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009; 60(Suppl 7): 330–40. Publisher Full Text
181. Major JM, Laughlin GA, Kritz-Silverstein D, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor-I and cancer mortality in older men. American Goiter Association Transactions of the American Goiter Association. 2010; 95: 1054–9. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
182. Allen NE, Appleby PN, Davey GK, et al.: The associations of diet with serum insulin-like growth factor I and its main binding proteins in 292 women meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002 Nov; 11(11): 1441–8. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
183. Mikami K, et al.: Prostate cancer risk in relation to insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3: A nested case-control study in large scale cohort study in Japan. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(Suppl): 57–61. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
184. Suzuki S, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein-3, and risk of colorectal cancer: a nested case-control study in the Japan Collaborative Cohort study. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(Suppl): 45–9. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
185. Akter S, Kurotani K, Nanri A, et al.: Dairy consumption is associated with decreased insulin resistance among the Japanese. Nutr. Res. 2013 Apr; 33(4): 286–92. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
186. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al.: Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1998; 351: 1393–6. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
187. Yu H, Spitz MR, Mistry J, et al.: Plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and lung cancer risk: a case-control analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 20; 91(2): 151–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
188. Spitz MR, et al.: Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein levels and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study nested in the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002; 11(11): 1413–8. PubMed Abstract Reference Source
189. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, et al.: Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 48–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
190. Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group:Key TJ, Appleby PN, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(6): 530–42. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source
191. Shi R, Yu H, McLarty J, et al.: IGF-I and breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer. 2004; 111: 418–23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source
192. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations: Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock - A Global Assessment Of Emissions And Mitigation Opportunities.2013.Reference Source
193. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Key facts and findings. By the numbers: GHG emissions by livestock.2018.Reference Source
194. Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, et al.: Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Environmental costs of animal-based categories. PNAS. 2014; 111(33): 11996–12001. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
195. Environmental Working Group: A meat-eaters guide to climate change - climate and environmental impacts.2011.Reference Source
196. GBD - Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators: Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995): 743–800. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
197. GBD - Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators, 2017: Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10; 392(10159): 1789–858. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
198. Murray CJ, Barber RM, Foreman KJ, et al.: Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015; 386(10009): 2145–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
199. Melo MC, Andersson E, Fjelldal PG, et al.: Salinity and photoperiod modulate pubertal development in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J. Endocrinol. 2014; 220(3): 319–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
200. De Ridder D, Wauben M, Voesenek R: Unravelling solutions for Future Food problems. Utrecht:Utrecht University. Production limiting factors;2018.Reference Source
201. The Farm Animal Welfare Council: Report on the welfare of farmed fish.2018.Reference Source
202. Good C, Davidson J: A Review of Factors In uencing Maturation of Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar, with Focus on Water Recirculation Aquaculture System Environments. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2016; 47: 605–32. Publisher Full Text
203. Kupferschmidt K: Here It Comes … The $375,000 Lab-Grown Beef Burger. Sci. Mag. Aug 2, 2013. Reference Source
204. Wilks M, Phillips CJV: Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0171904. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
205. Servick K: As lab-grown meat advances, U.S. lawmakers call for regulation. Sci. Mag. May 10, 2018. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
206. Smith A: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London:W. Strahan;1776; vol. 1. . 1st ed.
207. Boseley S: Mexican soda tax cuts sales of sugary soft drinks by 6% in first year. The Guardian. Jun 18, 2015.Reference Source
208. Boseley S: Mexico enacts soda tax in effort to combat world's highest obesity rate. The Guardian. Jan 16, 2014. Reference Source
209. Hanson K: USDA - Economic Research Service - Economic Research Report No. (ERR-103) The Food Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and Stimulus Effects of SNAP.2010.Reference Source
210. Economic Research Service: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Economic Linkages - Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Linkages with the General Economy.2018.Reference Source
211. Britten P, Marcoe K, Yamini S, et al.: Food Guide Pyramid- Development of Food Intake Patterns for the MyPyramid Food Guidance System. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2006; 38: S78–92.
212. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service: Agricultural Subsidies.2019.Reference Source
213. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service: U.S. dairy policy.2018.Reference Source
214. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture: 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.8th Edition.December 2015.Reference Source
215. Goldfarb G: Manuscript - the Ideal Diet for Humans. OSF. 2021. September 12.Publisher Full Text
216. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94(4): 1088–96.Publisher Full Text
217. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Changes in red meat consumption and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Three cohorts of US men and women. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(14): 1328–35.Publisher Full Text
218. Aune D, Ursin G, Veierød MB, et al.: Meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 2277–87.Publisher Full Text
219. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D, et al.: Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2010; 121(21): 2271–83.Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Nov 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

Yaron Sela
Roles: Formal Analysis, Validation

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 20 Jun 2023, 10:1135

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.2

version 1

Published: 10 Nov 2021, 10:1135

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.1

© 2023 Goldfarb G and Sela Y. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Goldfarb G and Sela Y. The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 10:1135 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73470.2)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 20 Jun 2023

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 01 Nov 2023

Zakira Naureen, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Ad Dakhiliyah ‍Governorate, Oman

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.147677.r194278

This manuscript is a good attempt on collecting the information across the globe to suggest an ideal diet for human. On scientific grounds the paper is sound enough to be accepted. However suggesting an ideal diet for human across the globe is not an easy task at all because the diet humans eat is based on their geographical, socioeconomic, cultural, religious, behavioral norms and besides that it varies from person to person their metabolic and hormonal state, life style pattern etc.

As a systematic review this is good job indeed, and I recommend acceptance, however it would have been better if they had classified the data according to geography, and socioeconomic status.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Metabolomic and genomic studies in plant animals and human. Recently working on genetic and metabolomic factors of obesity.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 10 Nov 2021

Views

Reviewer Report 22 Mar 2023

Aysha Karim Kiani, MAGI EUREGIO,, Bolzano, Italy; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.77123.r163444

This review plus meta-analysis has discussed effect of different food components on the quantity/longevity as well as quality of life. Introduction is well written and gives comprehensive picture of evolutionary changes in the dietary habits of man. Although, introduction should also include some information about current dietary habits and type of foods options available such as processed food to give.

The objectives and rationales of this systemic review are stated but they should be written under proper headings. Methodology is well explained and results are supported by the conclusions of previous studies.

This review elaborated that more consumption of plant based diet including vegetables, grains and fruits, increases the life span and prevent diseases while the over consumption of meat and dairy product decreases the life span as well as effects the health of people around the world.
In addition to the facts stated in this review it will be encouraged to also analyze the effect of these food components in relation with the geographical distribution and highlight the difference in the food or caloric requirements among people from different geographical regions. The policies suggested are valid and conclusions drawn are significant to consider.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Human genetics, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Diabetes, nutrigenomics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

28 Nov 2023

Author Response

Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to ... Continue reading Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your valuable insights, which have helped me to improve the quality of my work.

I would like to address the specific points you have raised. Firstly, regarding the introduction, I agree with your suggestion to include information about current dietary habits and types of food options available, including processed foods. I have made the necessary changes to the manuscript to reflect this.

Secondly, I appreciate your suggestion to include proper headings for the objectives and rationales of the review. I have reorganized the manuscript to ensure that the objectives and rationales are clearly stated and presented under proper headings.

Finally, I agree with your suggestion to analyze the effect of food components in relation to geographical distribution and highlight the differences in food or caloric requirements among people from different regions. I believe that this is an important consideration, and I have addressed this in the revision of the manuscript.

Overall, I am grateful for your feedback, which has helped me to improve the quality and clarity of my research paper. I hope that the changes I have made are satisfactory, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your valuable insights, which have helped me to improve the quality of my work.

I would like to address the specific points you have raised. Firstly, regarding the introduction, I agree with your suggestion to include information about current dietary habits and types of food options available, including processed foods. I have made the necessary changes to the manuscript to reflect this.

Secondly, I appreciate your suggestion to include proper headings for the objectives and rationales of the review. I have reorganized the manuscript to ensure that the objectives and rationales are clearly stated and presented under proper headings.

Finally, I agree with your suggestion to analyze the effect of food components in relation to geographical distribution and highlight the differences in food or caloric requirements among people from different regions. I believe that this is an important consideration, and I have addressed this in the revision of the manuscript.

Overall, I am grateful for your feedback, which has helped me to improve the quality and clarity of my research paper. I hope that the changes I have made are satisfactory, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

28 Nov 2023

Author Response

Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to ... Continue reading Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your valuable insights, which have helped me to improve the quality of my work.

I would like to address the specific points you have raised. Firstly, regarding the introduction, I agree with your suggestion to include information about current dietary habits and types of food options available, including processed foods. I have made the necessary changes to the manuscript to reflect this.

Secondly, I appreciate your suggestion to include proper headings for the objectives and rationales of the review. I have reorganized the manuscript to ensure that the objectives and rationales are clearly stated and presented under proper headings.

Finally, I agree with your suggestion to analyze the effect of food components in relation to geographical distribution and highlight the differences in food or caloric requirements among people from different regions. I believe that this is an important consideration, and I have addressed this in the revision of the manuscript.

Overall, I am grateful for your feedback, which has helped me to improve the quality and clarity of my research paper. I hope that the changes I have made are satisfactory, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your valuable insights, which have helped me to improve the quality of my work.

I would like to address the specific points you have raised. Firstly, regarding the introduction, I agree with your suggestion to include information about current dietary habits and types of food options available, including processed foods. I have made the necessary changes to the manuscript to reflect this.

Secondly, I appreciate your suggestion to include proper headings for the objectives and rationales of the review. I have reorganized the manuscript to ensure that the objectives and rationales are clearly stated and presented under proper headings.

Finally, I agree with your suggestion to analyze the effect of food components in relation to geographical distribution and highlight the differences in food or caloric requirements among people from different regions. I believe that this is an important consideration, and I have addressed this in the revision of the manuscript.

Overall, I am grateful for your feedback, which has helped me to improve the quality and clarity of my research paper. I hope that the changes I have made are satisfactory, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 29 Sep 2022

Katherine Curi Quinto, School of Public Health, Nutrition Research Institute, Cuernavaca, Mexico

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.77123.r145030

Complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the “Current Ideal dietary patterns” The historical track of changes of the human diet, is ok. But what about the current recommended dietary patterns such the one from the

Complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the “Current Ideal dietary patterns” The historical track of changes of the human diet, is ok. But what about the current recommended dietary patterns such the one from the EAT Lancet commission, flexitarian diet, etc.?
Be clear in the methods section. The first two lines do not contribute with the clarity of the explanation of the methods, I suggest to drop it.
Explain the rationality to make the research using terms regarding food groups instead of looking the impact of a dietary pattern which includes all the components of the diet.
Include in the methods the quality control for the selection/identification of the paper included in the review, as well as the quality of the papers itself.
It would be helpful to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, because you want to recommend an “ideal diet”. Eg. What is the “Plant based diet” or “plant based nutrition” as the author mentions.
In the discussion the authors include some recommendation for policy such as taxes for meat, it would be important to discuss about population that eat low amounts of meat due to low economical access, this population is vulnerable to important nutritional deficiencies that are caused of mortality and morbidity in early years. Remember that the main nutritional problem in developing countries is the malnutrition with the coexistence of excess weight.
Discuss how representative are the review in geographical terms. The results could be transferable to low-income countries.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

28 Nov 2023

Author Response
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that ... Continue reading
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that require further clarification.

In response to your first comment, I agree that it is important to complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the "Current Ideal Dietary patterns," such as the ones recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission and the flexitarian diet. I have revised the introduction to include a discussion on the rationale behind these dietary patterns.

Thank you for your feedback on the methods section. I have removed the first two lines to ensure clarity and conciseness.

Regarding your third comment, I understand your concern about using food groups instead of a dietary pattern that includes all diet components. I have revised the manuscript to explain the rationale behind this approach better.

In response to your fourth comment, I have included all studies with sufficient analytical data in the review. I have addressed your comment in the “study selection” category.

I appreciate your suggestion to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, particularly the "Plant-based diet.” I have revised the manuscript to provide a more detailed explanation of this dietary pattern to help readers better understand these concepts.

In response to your sixth comment, I understand the importance of discussing the potential impact of policy recommendations such as taxes for meat on vulnerable populations who may have limited access to other sources of nutrients. I have revised the discussion to include a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies on different populations.

Finally, I acknowledge your concern about the geographical representation of the review and how transferable the results are to low-income countries. I have revised the manuscript to include a more comprehensive discussion of opportunities available as well as the potential limitations of the study in terms of geographical representation and the applicability of the findings to different populations.

Thank you again for your valuable feedback. I hope the revisions will address your concerns, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that require further clarification.

In response to your first comment, I agree that it is important to complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the "Current Ideal Dietary patterns," such as the ones recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission and the flexitarian diet. I have revised the introduction to include a discussion on the rationale behind these dietary patterns.

Thank you for your feedback on the methods section. I have removed the first two lines to ensure clarity and conciseness.

Regarding your third comment, I understand your concern about using food groups instead of a dietary pattern that includes all diet components. I have revised the manuscript to explain the rationale behind this approach better.

In response to your fourth comment, I have included all studies with sufficient analytical data in the review. I have addressed your comment in the “study selection” category.

I appreciate your suggestion to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, particularly the "Plant-based diet.” I have revised the manuscript to provide a more detailed explanation of this dietary pattern to help readers better understand these concepts.

In response to your sixth comment, I understand the importance of discussing the potential impact of policy recommendations such as taxes for meat on vulnerable populations who may have limited access to other sources of nutrients. I have revised the discussion to include a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies on different populations.

Finally, I acknowledge your concern about the geographical representation of the review and how transferable the results are to low-income countries. I have revised the manuscript to include a more comprehensive discussion of opportunities available as well as the potential limitations of the study in terms of geographical representation and the applicability of the findings to different populations.

Thank you again for your valuable feedback. I hope the revisions will address your concerns, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

28 Nov 2023

Author Response
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that ... Continue reading
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that require further clarification.

In response to your first comment, I agree that it is important to complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the "Current Ideal Dietary patterns," such as the ones recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission and the flexitarian diet. I have revised the introduction to include a discussion on the rationale behind these dietary patterns.

Thank you for your feedback on the methods section. I have removed the first two lines to ensure clarity and conciseness.

Regarding your third comment, I understand your concern about using food groups instead of a dietary pattern that includes all diet components. I have revised the manuscript to explain the rationale behind this approach better.

In response to your fourth comment, I have included all studies with sufficient analytical data in the review. I have addressed your comment in the “study selection” category.

I appreciate your suggestion to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, particularly the "Plant-based diet.” I have revised the manuscript to provide a more detailed explanation of this dietary pattern to help readers better understand these concepts.

In response to your sixth comment, I understand the importance of discussing the potential impact of policy recommendations such as taxes for meat on vulnerable populations who may have limited access to other sources of nutrients. I have revised the discussion to include a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies on different populations.

Finally, I acknowledge your concern about the geographical representation of the review and how transferable the results are to low-income countries. I have revised the manuscript to include a more comprehensive discussion of opportunities available as well as the potential limitations of the study in terms of geographical representation and the applicability of the findings to different populations.

Thank you again for your valuable feedback. I hope the revisions will address your concerns, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that require further clarification.

In response to your first comment, I agree that it is important to complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the "Current Ideal Dietary patterns," such as the ones recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission and the flexitarian diet. I have revised the introduction to include a discussion on the rationale behind these dietary patterns.

Thank you for your feedback on the methods section. I have removed the first two lines to ensure clarity and conciseness.

Regarding your third comment, I understand your concern about using food groups instead of a dietary pattern that includes all diet components. I have revised the manuscript to explain the rationale behind this approach better.

In response to your fourth comment, I have included all studies with sufficient analytical data in the review. I have addressed your comment in the “study selection” category.

I appreciate your suggestion to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, particularly the "Plant-based diet.” I have revised the manuscript to provide a more detailed explanation of this dietary pattern to help readers better understand these concepts.

In response to your sixth comment, I understand the importance of discussing the potential impact of policy recommendations such as taxes for meat on vulnerable populations who may have limited access to other sources of nutrients. I have revised the discussion to include a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies on different populations.

Finally, I acknowledge your concern about the geographical representation of the review and how transferable the results are to low-income countries. I have revised the manuscript to include a more comprehensive discussion of opportunities available as well as the potential limitations of the study in terms of geographical representation and the applicability of the findings to different populations.

Thank you again for your valuable feedback. I hope the revisions will address your concerns, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Nov 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 2 (revision) 20 Jun 23			read
Version 1 10 Nov 21	read	read

Katherine Curi Quinto, Nutrition Research Institute, Cuernavaca, Mexico
Aysha Karim Kiani, MAGI EUREGIO,, Bolzano, Italy; National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Zakira Naureen, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

9 Views

01 Nov 2023 | for Version 2

Zakira Naureen, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Ad Dakhiliyah ‍Governorate, Oman

9 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Metabolomic and genomic studies in plant animals and human. Recently working on genetic and metabolomic factors of obesity.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

22 Mar 2023 | for Version 1

Aysha Karim Kiani, MAGI EUREGIO,, Bolzano, Italy; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan

11 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Human genetics, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Diabetes, nutrigenomics

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

Dear Dr. Aysha Karim Kiani,

I appreciate your thoughtful and constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with your valuable insights, which have helped me to improve the quality of my work.

I would like to address the specific points you have raised. Firstly, regarding the introduction, I agree with your suggestion to include information about current dietary habits and types of food options available, including processed foods. I have made the necessary changes to the manuscript to reflect this.

Secondly, I appreciate your suggestion to include proper headings for the objectives and rationales of the review. I have reorganized the manuscript to ensure that the objectives and rationales are clearly stated and presented under proper headings.

Finally, I agree with your suggestion to analyze the effect of food components in relation to geographical distribution and highlight the differences in food or caloric requirements among people from different regions. I believe that this is an important consideration, and I have addressed this in the revision of the manuscript.

Overall, I am grateful for your feedback, which has helped me to improve the quality and clarity of my research paper. I hope that the changes I have made are satisfactory, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

18 Views

29 Sep 2022 | for Version 1

Katherine Curi Quinto, School of Public Health, Nutrition Research Institute, Cuernavaca, Mexico

18 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the “Current Ideal dietary patterns” The historical track of changes of the human diet, is ok. But what about the current recommended dietary patterns such the one from the EAT Lancet commission, flexitarian diet, etc.?
Be clear in the methods section. The first two lines do not contribute with the clarity of the explanation of the methods, I suggest to drop it.
Explain the rationality to make the research using terms regarding food groups instead of looking the impact of a dietary pattern which includes all the components of the diet.
Include in the methods the quality control for the selection/identification of the paper included in the review, as well as the quality of the papers itself.
It would be helpful to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, because you want to recommend an “ideal diet”. Eg. What is the “Plant based diet” or “plant based nutrition” as the author mentions.
In the discussion the authors include some recommendation for policy such as taxes for meat, it would be important to discuss about population that eat low amounts of meat due to low economical access, this population is vulnerable to important nutritional deficiencies that are caused of mortality and morbidity in early years. Remember that the main nutritional problem in developing countries is the malnutrition with the coexistence of excess weight.
Discuss how representative are the review in geographical terms. The results could be transferable to low-income countries.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

28 Nov 2023

Galit Goldfarb, Nutrition, OUS University, The Royal Academy of Economics and Technology, Zürich, Switzerland

Dear Dr. Katherine Curi Quinto,
Thank you for your constructive feedback on my research paper about the ideal diet for humans. I appreciate your efforts in providing specific points that require further clarification.

In response to your first comment, I agree that it is important to complement the introduction with background and rationality regarding the "Current Ideal Dietary patterns," such as the ones recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission and the flexitarian diet. I have revised the introduction to include a discussion on the rationale behind these dietary patterns.
Thank you for your feedback on the methods section. I have removed the first two lines to ensure clarity and conciseness.
Regarding your third comment, I understand your concern about using food groups instead of a dietary pattern that includes all diet components. I have revised the manuscript to explain the rationale behind this approach better.
In response to your fourth comment, I have included all studies with sufficient analytical data in the review. I have addressed your comment in the “study selection” category.
I appreciate your suggestion to explain the different dietary patterns included in the review, particularly the "Plant-based diet.” I have revised the manuscript to provide a more detailed explanation of this dietary pattern to help readers better understand these concepts.
In response to your sixth comment, I understand the importance of discussing the potential impact of policy recommendations such as taxes for meat on vulnerable populations who may have limited access to other sources of nutrients. I have revised the discussion to include a more thorough exploration of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such policies on different populations.
Finally, I acknowledge your concern about the geographical representation of the review and how transferable the results are to low-income countries. I have revised the manuscript to include a more comprehensive discussion of opportunities available as well as the potential limitations of the study in terms of geographical representation and the applicability of the findings to different populations.

Thank you again for your valuable feedback. I hope the revisions will address your concerns, and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Best regards,
Dr. Galit Goldfarb

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables (ST/ESA/SER.A/399). 2017. Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. World resources report 2013–14: InterIm FIndIngs. Creating a Sustainable Food Future; A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. 2014.

[3] 3. Eswaran H, Lal R, Reich PF: Land Degradation: An Overview. Responses to Land Degradation.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Land Degradation and Desertification, Khon Kaen:Oxford Press;2001.

[4] 4. Bindoff NL, Stott PA, AchutaRao KM, et al.: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change: from Global to Regional.In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.;2013.

[5] 5. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO: The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017.Building resilience for peace and food security.Rome:FAO;2017.

[6] 6. Holleman C, Jackson J, Sánchez MV, et al.: Sowing the seeds of peace for food security - Disentangling the nexus between conflict, food security and peace, FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study 2. Rome:FAO; 2017, 95 pp.

[7] 7. The Lancet: Over 95% of the world’s population has health problems, with over a third having more than five ailments. ScienceDaily.2015, June 8.

[8] 8. Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators: Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995): 743–800.

[9] 9. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al.: Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.Lancet.2019 Feb 2; 393(10170): 447–92. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):530. Erratum in: Lancet. 2019 Jun 29;393(10191):2590. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Feb 1;395(10221):338. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):e56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Domínguez-Rodrigo M: Is the ‘Savanna Hypothesis’ a Dead Concept for Explaining the Emergence of the Earliest Hominins?. Curr. Anthropol. 2014; 55(1): 59–81. JSTOR, JSTOR. Reference Source

[11] 11. US history.org, Ancient civilisations, prehistoric times:2019. http://www.ushistory.org/civ/2.asp

[12] 12. Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, et al.: A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad. Central Africa. Nature. 2002; 418: 145–51. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[13] 13. Schoenemann PT: A Companion to Paleoanthropology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.;2013; vol. 8. : 136–64. 1st ed: Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[14] 14. Folger T: The Naked and the Bipedal. Discover Mag. 1993; 14(11): 34–5.

[15] 15. Nestle M: Animal vs plant foods in human diets and health: is the historical record unequivocal?. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999; 58: 211–8. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Grine FE, Sponheimer M, Ungar PS, et al.: Dental microwear and stable isotopes inform the paleoecology of extinct hominins. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2012; 148: 285–317. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Vincent AS: Plant foods in savanna environments: a preliminary report of tubers eaten by the Hadza of Northern Tanzania. World Archaeol. 1985; 17: 131–48. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Yeakel JD, Bennett NC, Koch PL, et al.: The isotopic ecology of African mole rats informs hypotheses on the evolution of human diet. Proc R Soc Biol. 2007; 274: 1723–30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[19] 19. Cerling TE: Development of grasslands and savannas in East Africa during the Neogene. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1992; 97: 241–7. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Lee-Thorp J, Likius A, Mackaye HT, et al.: Isotopic evidence for an early shift to C4 resources by Pliocene hominins in Chad. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20369–72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[21] 21. Oelze VM, Fuller BT, Richards MP, et al.: Exploring the contribution and significance of animal protein in the diet of bonobos by stable isotope ratio analysis of hair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 9792–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[22] 22. Dominy NJ: Hominins living on the sedge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20171–2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[23] 23. Lee-Thorp J, Likius A, Mackaye HT, et al.: Isotopic evidence for an early shift to C4 resources by Pliocene hominins in Chad. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012; 109: 20369–72. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[24] 24. Zink KD, Lieberman DE, Lucas PW: Food material properties and early hominin processing techniques. J. Hum. Evol. 2014; 77: 155–66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Organ C, Nunn CL, Machanda Z, et al.: Phylogenetic rate shifts in feeding time during the evolution of Homo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 14555–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[26] 26. Anton SC, Potts R, Aiello LC: Human evolution – Evolution of early Homo: an integrated biological perspective.2014; 345(6192): 1236828. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Pilbeam D, Gould SJ: Size and Scaling in Human Evolution. Science. 1974; 186(186): 892–901. Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Oelze VM, Fuller BT, Richards MP, et al.: Exploring the contribution and significance of animal protein in the diet of bonobos by stable isotope ratio analysis of hair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108: 9792–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[29] 29. Laden G, Wrangham R: The rise of the hominids as an adaptive shift in fallback foods: Plant underground storage organs (USOs) and australopith origins. J. Hum. Evol. 2005 Oct; 49(4): 482–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Wood BA: Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature. 1992; 355: 783–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[31] 31. Wood BA: Early Homo. How many species?:Kimbel WH, Martin LB, editors. Species, species concepts, and primate evolution. New York:Plenum Press:1993; p. 485–522. Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. Calvin WH: A brief history of the mind: From apes to intellect and beyond. Oxford:Oxford University Press;2005.

[33] 33. Calvin WH: The Evolution of Human Minds.2007. Reference Source

[34] 34. Roach NT, Venkadesan M, Rainbow MJ, et al.: Elastic energy storage in the shoulder and the evolution of high-speed throwing in Homo. Nature. 2013; 498: 483–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[35] 35. Stefansson V: Rabbit Starvation, high protein and high fat diets.1927. Reference Source

[36] 36. Bilsborough S, Mann N: A review of issues of dietary protein intake in humans. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2006; 16(2): 129–52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[37] 37. Speth JD: The Paleoanthropology and Archaeology of Big-Game Hunting: Protein, Fat, or Politics?. New York:Springer;2012.

[38] 38. Ledger HP: Body composition as a basis for a comparative study of some East African mammals. Symp Zool Soc. 1968; 21: 289–310.

[39] 39. Burton RF: The Lake Regions of Central Africa, A Picture of Exploration. Cambridge:Forgotten Books;1860. Publisher Full Text

[40] 40. Wrangham R, Conklin-Brittain N: Cooking as a biological trait. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2003; 136(1): 35–46. Publisher Full Text

[41] 41. Wrangham R: Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York:Basic Books;2009.

[42] 42. Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC, Wood B, et al.: Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 2014 Jun; 71: 119–28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[43] 43. Marlowe FW: The Hadza: Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania. Berkeley:University of California Press;2010.

[44] 44. Lee RB: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Daly, Richard Heywood. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press;1999.

[45] 45. Crittenden AN: The Importance of Honey Consumption in Human Evolution. Food and Foodways. 2011; 19: 257–73. Publisher Full Text

[46] 46. Speth JD: Bison Kills and Bone Counts: Decision Making by Ancient Hunters. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecology. Chicago:University of Chicago;1983.

[47] 47. Milton K: A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evolut Anthrop. 1999; 8: 11–21. Publisher Full Text

[48] 48. Andrews P, Martin L: Hominoid dietary evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1991; 334: 199–209.

[49] 49. Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Office of International Affairs, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I: Grains. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press;1996.

[50] 50. Noel D: Vietmeyer, Forward. Lost Crops of Africa: Volume I. Grains. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press;1996.Reference Source

[51] 51. Graves RR, Lupo AC, McCarthy RC, et al.: Just how strapping was KNM-WT 15000?. J. Hum. Evol. 2010; 59(5): 542–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[52] 52. MacLarnon AM: The vertebrate canal.Walker A, Leakey R, editors. The Nariokotome Homo erectus Skeleton. Harvard:Harvard University Press;1993. p. 359–90.

[53] 53. Aiello LC, Wheeler P: The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 1995; 36(2): 199–221. Publisher Full Text

[54] 54. Ungar PS, Sponheimer M: The diets of early hominins. Science. 2011; 80(334): 190–3.

[55] 55. Sponheimer M, Alemseged Z, Cerling TE, et al.: Isotopic evidence of early hominin diets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013; 110: 1–6.

[56] 56. Sponheimer M, Lee-Thorp J, de Ruiter D , et al.: Hominins, sedges, and termites: New carbon isotope data from the Sterkfontein valley and Kruger National Park. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 48: 301–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[57] 57. Peters CR, Vogel JC: Africa’s wild C4 plant foods and possible early hominid diets. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 48: 219–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[58] 58. Yeakel JD, Bennett NC, Koch PL, et al.: The isotopic ecology of African mole rats informs hypotheses on the evolution of human diet. Proc R Soc Biol. 2007; 274: 1723–30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[59] 59. Cerling TE, Chritz KL, Jablonski NG, et al.: Diet of Theropithecus from 4 to 1 Ma in Kenya. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013; 110: 10507–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[60] 60. Schoeninger MJ, Moore J, Sept JM: Subsistence strategies of two “savanna” chimpanzee populations: The stable isotope evidence. Am. J. Primatol. 1999; 49: 297–314. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[61] 61. Thavarajah P, Thavarajah D, Vandenberg A: Low phytic acid lentils (Lens culinaris L.): A potential solution for increased micronutrient bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009; 57: 9044–9. Publisher Full Text

[62] 62. Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Pina G, Oomah B: Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health. Food Res. Int. 2010; 43: 461–82. Publisher Full Text

[63] 63. Singh B, Singh JP, Shevkani K, et al.: Bioactive constituents in pulses and their health benefits. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017; 54(4): 858–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[64] 64. Giusti F, Gaprioli G, Ricciutelli M, et al.: Determination of fourteen polyphenols in pulses by high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and correlation study with antioxidant activity and colour. Food Chem. 2017; 221(221): 689–97. Publisher Full Text

[65] 65. Tonstad S, Malik N, Haddad E: A high-fibre bean-rich diet versus a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014; 27(Suppl 2): 109–16. Publisher Full Text

[66] 66. Hermsdorff HH, Zulet MA, Abete I, et al.: A legume-based hypocaloric diet reduces proinflammatory status and improves metabolic features in overweight/obese subjects. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011; 50(1): 61–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[67] 67. Chang WC, Wahlqvist ML, Chang HY, et al.: A bean-free diet increases the risk of all-cause mortality among Taiwanese women: the role of metabolic syndrome. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15(4): 663–72,PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[68] 68. Abeysekara S, Chilibeck PD, Vatanparast H, et al.: A pulse-based diet is effective for reducing total and LDL-cholesterol in older adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2012; 108(Suppl 1): S103–S110. Publisher Full Text

[69] 69. Garden-Robinson J: Pulses: The Perfect Food Developed for the Northern Pulse Growers Association. Fargo:North Dakota State University Extension Service;2012.

[70] 70. Gray PB: The Evolution and Endocrinology of Human Behavior: a Focus on Sex Differences and Reproduction. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press:2010. pp. 277–92.

[71] 71. Marlowe FW: Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 2005; 14(2): 54–67. Publisher Full Text

[72] 72. Lee RB: Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press;2005.

[73] 73. Binford LR: Human ancestors: Changing views of their behavior. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 1986; 3: 235–57.

[74] 74. Laden G, Wrangham R: The rise of the hominids as an adaptive shift in fallback foods: Plant underground storage organs (USOs) and australopith origins. J. Hum. Evol. 2005; 49(4): 482–98. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[75] 75. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, et al.: Theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 2000; 9: 156–85. Publisher Full Text

[76] 76. Peters CR, O’Brien EM: The early hominid plant food niche: Insights from an analysis of plant exploitation by Homo, Pan, Papio in eastern and southern Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 1981; 22: 127–40. Publisher Full Text

[77] 77. Carmody RN, Wrangham RW: The energetic significance of cooking. J. Hum. Evol. 2009; 57: 379–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[78] 78. Wrangham RW, Conklin-Brittain N: Cooking as a biological trait. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2003; 136: 35–46. Publisher Full Text

[79] 79. Johns T: The Origins of Human Diet & Medicine. Tucson:The University of Arizona Press;1996.

[80] 80. Stahl A: Hominid Dietary Selection Before Fire. Curr. Anthropol. 1984; 25: 151–68. Publisher Full Text

[81] 81. Chaudhry M: Green Gold: Value-added pulses. NW:Quantum Media;2011.

[82] 82. Tovar J, Nilsson A, Johansson M, et al.: Combining functional features of whole-grain barley and legumes for dietary reduction of cardiometabolic risk: a randomised cross-over intervention in mature women. Br. J. Nutr. 2014 Feb; 111(4): 706–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[83] 83. Thavarajah P, Thavarajah D, Vandenberg A: Low phytic acid lentils (Lens culinaris L.): A potential solution for increased micronutrient bioavailability. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009; 57: 9044–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[84] 84. Henry AG: Recovering Dietary Information from Extant and Extinct Primates Using Plant Microremains. Int. J. Primatol. 2012; 33: 702–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[85] 85. Sistiaga A, Mallol C, Galván B, et al.: The Neanderthal Meal: A New Perspective Using Faecal Biomarkers. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e101045. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[86] 86. Hardy K, Buckley S, Collins MJ, et al.: Neanderthal medics? Evidence for food, cooking, and medicinal plants entrapped in dental calculus. Naturwissenschaften. 2012; 99(8): 617–26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[87] 87. Lee RB, DeVore L: Man the Hunter Transaction Publishers.1968.

[88] 88. Woodburn JC: An introduction to Hadza ecology.Lee RB, DeVore I, editors. Man the hunter. Chicago:Aldlne;1968.

[89] 89. Jolly CJ: The Seed-Eaters: A New Model of Hominid Differentiation Based on a Baboon Analogy. Man. 1970; 5(1): 5–26. Publisher Full Text

[90] 90. Peters CR, O’Brien EM: The early hominin plant food niche: Insights from an analysis of plant exploitation by Homo, Pan, Papio in eastern and southern Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 1981; 22: 127–40. Publisher Full Text

[91] 91. Zilhan AL: Women in Evolution, II. Subsistence and social organisation among early hominids.1978; 4(1): 4–20.

[92] 92. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). PNAS. 2011; 108(2): 486–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[93] 93. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011; 108(2): 486–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[94] 94. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR: Plant foods and the dietary ecology of Neanderthals and early modern humans. J. Hum. Evol. 2014; 69: 44–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[95] 95. Roebroeks W, Villa P: On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011; 108: 5209–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[96] 96. Sandgathea DM, Dibblec HL, Goldberg P, et al.: Timing of the appearance of habitual fire use. PNAS. 2011; 108: E298. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[97] 97. James SR, Dennell RW, Gilbert AS, et al.: Hominid Use of Fire in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene: A Review of the Evidence. Curr. Anthropol. 1989; 30(1): 1–26. Publisher Full Text

[98] 98. Wrangham R: Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York:Basic Books;2009.

[99] 99. McHenry HM: Human Evolution.Ruse M, Travis J, editors. Evolution: the first four billion years. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press;2009; p. 265. 978-0-674-03175-3.

[100] 100. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, et al.: A Theory of Human Life History Evolution: Diet, Intelligence and Longevity. Evol. Anthropol. 2000; 9(4): 156–85. Publisher Full Text

[101] 101. Calvin WH: A Brain for All Seasons: Human Evolution and Abrupt Climate Change. Chicago:University of Chicago Press;2003.

[102] 102. Calvin WH: The Evolution of Human Minds. Chicago:University of Chicago;2007.

[103] 103. McDougall I, Brown FH, Fleagle JG: Fossil Reanalysis Pushes Back Origin of Homo sapiens. Sci. Am. 2005. “Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia”. Nature 433 (7027): 733–736. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..733M. doi:10.1038/nature03258. PMID 15716951. H. sapiens idaltu is a confirmed subspecies, based on 3 craniums dated 0.16 – 0.15 Mya found in Ethiopia (1997/2003).

[104] 104. McDougall I, Brown FH, Fleagle JG: Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia. Nature. 2005; 433(7027): 733–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[105] 105. Diamond J: Once upon a time, all the fruits, nuts, and berries our gathering ancestors ate were wild. Someone, at some time, had to come up with the bright idea of crops. Discovery Magazine - Biology and Medicine. September 1994.

[106] 106. Cunliffe B: Prehistoric Europe: An Illustrated History. Oxford University Press;1998.

[107] 107. American Museum of Natural History: Domestication Timeline.Reference Source

[108] 108. The Bradshaw Foundation: 10,000-8,000 years ago.Reference Source

[109] 109. Speth JD: Bison Kills and Bone Counts: Decision Making by Ancient Hunters. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecology. Chicago:University of Chicago;1983.

[110] 110. Milton K: A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 1999; 8: 11–21. Publisher Full Text

[111] 111. Gibbons A: The Evolution of Diet. Nat Geo Mag. 2013.

[112] 112. Diamond J: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race. Discover Mag. 1987; 64–6.

[113] 113. Hawks J: Selection for smaller brains in Holocene human evolution. John Hawks webblog. Winconsin:Department of Anthropology University of Wisconsin;2011.

[114] 114. Cohen MN, Armelagos GJ: Paleopathology and the Origins of Agriculture. London:Academic Press;1984.

[115] 115. The Genographic Project: The Development of Agriculture; The Farming Revolution. National Geographic Society;2019.

[116] 116. Wessel T: The Agricultural Foundations of Civilization. J Agricult Hum Values. 1984; 1: 9–12. Publisher Full Text

[117] 117. Eaton SB, Konner M, Shostak M: Stone agers in the fast lane: Chronic degenrative diseases in evolutionary perspective. Am. J. Med. 1988; 84: 739–49. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[118] 118. Hoyert DL, Xu J: Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2011. Division of Vital Statistics National Vital, Statistics Reports. 2012; 61(6): 1–52.

[119] 119. American Heart Association: Statistical Update. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update. A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131: e29–322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[120] 120. Freudenheim MPH: Chronic Care in America: A 21st Century Challenge. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University;2004.

[121] 121. Prentice T: Health, history and hard choices: Funding dilemmas in a fast-changing world. Global Health Histories. Bloomington:University of Indiana;2006.

[122] 122. Anderson G: The Growing Burden of Chronic Disease in American. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119: 263–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[123] 123. Barclay E: National Public Radio - news & analysis. meat consumption. A Nation Of Meat Eaters: See How It All Adds Up. Reference Source

[124] 124. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al.: American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131(4): e29–322. Publisher Full Text

[125] 125. Williams C: Kwashiorkor. Lancet. 1935; 226(5855): 1151–2. Publisher Full Text

[126] 126. Hay WW, Levin MJ, Sondheimer JM:Krebs NF, Primak LE, Hambridge KM, editors.Normal childhood nutrition & its disorders. Current Pediatric Diagnosis & Treatment. New York:McGraw-Hill;2003; 17. : p. 291–2.

[127] 127. Donald P, Pitts CC, Pohl SL: Body weight and composition in laboratory rats: effects of diets with high or low protein concentrations. Science. 1981; 211(4478): 185–6.

[128] 128. Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ, Tyzbir RS: Mechanisms of thermogenesis induced by low protein diets. Metabol. 1983; 32(3): 257–61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[129] 129. Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ: Influence of carbohydrate and fat intake on diet-induced thermogenesis and brown fat activity in rats fed low protein diets. J. Nutr. 1987; 117(10): 1721–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[130] 130. Stillings BR: World supplies of animal protein.Porter JWG, Rolls BA, editors. Proteins in Human Nutrition. London:Academic Press;1973; p. 11–33.

[131] 131. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Beltsville:The Nutrient Data Laboratory;2004. Reference Source

[132] 132. Osthoff G, Hugo A, de Wit M : The composition of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) milk. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006; 145(3-4): 265–9. Publisher Full Text

[133] 133. World Health Organization: WHO at 70 - working for better health for everyone, everywhere. News release. GENEVA;cited 5 APRIL 2018.Reference Source

[134] 134. Wang Y, Lehane C, Ghebremeskel K, et al.: Modern organic and broiler chickens sold for human consumption provide more energy from fat than protein. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Mar; 13(3): 400–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[135] 135. Simopoulos AP: An Increase in the ω-6/ω-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients. 2016; 8(3): 128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[136] 136. Ponnampalam EN, Mann NJ, Sinclair AJ: Effect of feeding systems on omega-3 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts: potential impact on human health. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006; 15(1): 21–9. PubMed Abstract

[137] 137. Salque M, Bogucki PI, Pyzel J, et al.: Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe. Nature. 2013; 493: 522–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[138] 138. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al.: Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000 Apr 19; 283(15): 2008–12. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[139] 139. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, et al.: A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods. 2010 Apr; 1(2): 97–111. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[140] 140. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012; 172(7): 555–3. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[141] 141. Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, et al.: Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009 Mar 23; 169(6): 562–71. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[142] 142. Wang X, Lin X, Ouyang YY, et al.: Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohortstudies. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Apr; 19(5): 893–905. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[143] 143. Larsson SC, Orsini N: Red meat and processed meat consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 1; 179(3): 282–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[144] 144. Orlich MJ, Singh PN, Sabaté J, et al.: Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Mortality in Adventist Health Study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013; 173: 1230–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[145] 145. Key TJ, Fraser GE, Thorogood M, et al.: Mortality in vegetarians and nonvegetarians: detailed findings from a collaborative analysis of 5 prospective studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999 Sep; 70(3 Suppl): 516S–24S. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[146] 146. Fraser GE: Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999 Sep; 70(3 Suppl): 532S–8S. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[147] 147. Kim H, Caulfield LE, Rebholz CM: Healthy Plant-Based Diets Are Associated with Lower Risk of All-Cause Mortality in US Adults. J. Nutr. 2018 Apr 1; 148(4): 624–31. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[148] 148. Park Y, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, et al.: Dietary fiber intake and mortality in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011 Jun 27; 171(12): 1061–8. Epub 2011 Feb 14.Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[149] 149. Chan CW, Lee PH: Association between dietary fibre intake with cancer and all-cause mortality among 15 740 adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2016 Oct; 29(5): 633–42. Publisher Full Text

[150] 150. Dominguez LJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Toledo E, et al.: Dietary fiber intake and mortality in a Mediterranean population: the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) project. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018 Oct 26; 58: 3009–22. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[151] 151. Huang T, Xu M, Lee A, et al.: Consumption of whole grains and cereal fiber and total and cause-specific mortality: prospective analysis of 367,442 individuals. BMC Med. 2015 Mar 24; 13: 59. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text >Reference Source

[152] 152. Buil-Cosiales P, Zazpe I, Toledo E, et al.: Fiber intake and all-cause mortality in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014 Dec; 100(6): 1498–507. Publisher Full Text PubMed Abstract | Reference Source

[153] 153. Xu H, Huang X, Risérus U, et al.: Dietary fiber, kidney function, inflammation, and mortality risk. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014 Dec 5; 9(12): 2104–10. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[154] 154. Kim Y, Je Y: Dietary fibre intake and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all cancers: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016 Jan; 109(1): 39–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[155] 155. Yang Y, Zhao LG, Wu QJ, et al.: Association between dietary fiber and lower risk of all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015 Jan 15; 181(2): 83–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[156] 156. Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJ, et al.: A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug; 29(8): 1777–83. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[157] 157. Kahleova H, Tura A, Hill M, et al.: A Plant-Based Dietary Intervention Improves Beta-Cell Function and Insulin Resistance in Overweight Adults: A 16-Week Randomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2018; 10(2):189. Published 2018 Feb 9. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[158] 158. Lee YM, Kim SA, Lee IK, et al.: Effect of a brown rice based vegan diet and conventional diabetic diet on glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes: A 12-week randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2; 11(6): e0155918. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[159] 159. Tonstad S, Butler T, Yan R, et al.: Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 May; 32(5): 791–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[160] 160. Li S, Chiuve SE, Flint A, et al.: Better diet quality and decreased mortality among myocardial infarction survivors. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013; 173: 1808–18. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[161] 161. Stewart RA, Wallentin L, Benatar J, et al.: Dietary patterns and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in a global study of high-risk patients with stable coronary heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37(25): 1993–2001. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text PubMed Abstract | Reference Source

[162] 162. Kwok CS, Umar S, Myint PK, et al.: Vegetarian diet, Seventh Day Adventists and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014 Oct 20; 176(3): 680–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[163] 163. Laron Z: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1): a growth hormone. Mol. Pathol. 2001 Oct; 54(5): 311–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[164] 164. Renehan AG, et al.: Circulating insulin-like growth factor II and colorectal adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000; 85(9): 3402–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[165] 165. Yu H, Rohan T: Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000 Sep 20; 92(18): 1472–89. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[166] 166. Annekatrin L, et al.: Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2002; 101(6): 549–54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[167] 167. Renehan AG, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet. 2004; 363(9418): 1346–53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[168] 168. Allen NE, et al.: Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3 concentrations and prostate cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007; 16(6): 1121–7. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[169] 169. Roddam AW, et al.: Insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and prostate cancer risk: analysis of individual patient data from 12 prospective studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2008; 149(7): 461–71. W83–8. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[170] 170. Key TJ, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(6): 530–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[171] 171. Rinaldi S, et al.: Serum levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and colorectal cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort, plus a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Cancer. 2010; 126(7): 1702–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[172] 172. Clayton PE, Banerjee I, Murray PG, et al.: Growth hormone, the insulin- like growth factor axis, insulin and cancer risk. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011; 7: 11–24. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[173] 173. Yang Y, Yee D: Targeting insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling in breast cancer. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2012 Dec; 17(3-4): 251–61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[174] 174. Christopoulos PF, Msaouel P, Koutsilieris M: The role of the insulin-like growth factor-1 system in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2015; 14: 43. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[175] 175. Pollak M: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008; 8: 915–28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[176] 176. Hoppe C, Molgaard C, Michaelsen KF: Cow's milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2006; 26: 131–73. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[177] 177. Rogers I, Emmett P, Gunnell D, et al.: Milk as a food for growth? The insulin-like growth factors link. Public Health Nutr. 2006 May; 9(3): 359–68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[178] 178. Rich-Edwards JW, Ganmaa D, Pollak MN, et al.: Milk consumption and the prepubertal somatotropic axis. Nutr. J. 2007; 6: 28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[179] 179. Crowe FL, Key TJ, Allen NE, et al.: The association between diet and serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009; 18: 1333–1340. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[180] 180. Qin LQ, He K, Xu JY: Milk consumption and circulating insulin-like growth factor-I level: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009; 60(Suppl 7): 330–40. Publisher Full Text

[181] 181. Major JM, Laughlin GA, Kritz-Silverstein D, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor-I and cancer mortality in older men. American Goiter Association Transactions of the American Goiter Association. 2010; 95: 1054–9. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[182] 182. Allen NE, Appleby PN, Davey GK, et al.: The associations of diet with serum insulin-like growth factor I and its main binding proteins in 292 women meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002 Nov; 11(11): 1441–8. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[183] 183. Mikami K, et al.: Prostate cancer risk in relation to insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3: A nested case-control study in large scale cohort study in Japan. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(Suppl): 57–61. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[184] 184. Suzuki S, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, IGF binding protein-3, and risk of colorectal cancer: a nested case-control study in the Japan Collaborative Cohort study. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(Suppl): 45–9. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[185] 185. Akter S, Kurotani K, Nanri A, et al.: Dairy consumption is associated with decreased insulin resistance among the Japanese. Nutr. Res. 2013 Apr; 33(4): 286–92. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[186] 186. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al.: Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1998; 351: 1393–6. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[187] 187. Yu H, Spitz MR, Mistry J, et al.: Plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and lung cancer risk: a case-control analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999 Jan 20; 91(2): 151–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[188] 188. Spitz MR, et al.: Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein levels and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study nested in the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002; 11(11): 1413–8. PubMed Abstract Reference Source

[189] 189. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, et al.: Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 48–60. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[190] 190. Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group:Key TJ, Appleby PN, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(6): 530–42. Publisher Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text Reference Source

[191] 191. Shi R, Yu H, McLarty J, et al.: IGF-I and breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer. 2004; 111: 418–23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[192] 192. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations: Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock - A Global Assessment Of Emissions And Mitigation Opportunities.2013.Reference Source

[193] 193. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Key facts and findings. By the numbers: GHG emissions by livestock.2018.Reference Source

[194] 194. Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, et al.: Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Environmental costs of animal-based categories. PNAS. 2014; 111(33): 11996–12001. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[195] 195. Environmental Working Group: A meat-eaters guide to climate change - climate and environmental impacts.2011.Reference Source

[196] 196. GBD - Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators: Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; 386(9995): 743–800. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[197] 197. GBD - Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators, 2017: Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10; 392(10159): 1789–858. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[198] 198. Murray CJ, Barber RM, Foreman KJ, et al.: Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015; 386(10009): 2145–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[199] 199. Melo MC, Andersson E, Fjelldal PG, et al.: Salinity and photoperiod modulate pubertal development in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J. Endocrinol. 2014; 220(3): 319–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[200] 200. De Ridder D, Wauben M, Voesenek R: Unravelling solutions for Future Food problems. Utrecht:Utrecht University. Production limiting factors;2018.Reference Source

[201] 201. The Farm Animal Welfare Council: Report on the welfare of farmed fish.2018.Reference Source

[202] 202. Good C, Davidson J: A Review of Factors In uencing Maturation of Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar, with Focus on Water Recirculation Aquaculture System Environments. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 2016; 47: 605–32. Publisher Full Text

[203] 203. Kupferschmidt K: Here It Comes … The $375,000 Lab-Grown Beef Burger. Sci. Mag. Aug 2, 2013. Reference Source

[204] 204. Wilks M, Phillips CJV: Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0171904. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[205] 205. Servick K: As lab-grown meat advances, U.S. lawmakers call for regulation. Sci. Mag. May 10, 2018. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[206] 206. Smith A: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London:W. Strahan;1776; vol. 1. . 1st ed.

[207] 207. Boseley S: Mexican soda tax cuts sales of sugary soft drinks by 6% in first year. The Guardian. Jun 18, 2015.Reference Source

[208] 208. Boseley S: Mexico enacts soda tax in effort to combat world's highest obesity rate. The Guardian. Jan 16, 2014. Reference Source

[209] 209. Hanson K: USDA - Economic Research Service - Economic Research Report No. (ERR-103) The Food Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and Stimulus Effects of SNAP.2010.Reference Source

[210] 210. Economic Research Service: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - Economic Linkages - Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Linkages with the General Economy.2018.Reference Source

[211] 211. Britten P, Marcoe K, Yamini S, et al.: Food Guide Pyramid- Development of Food Intake Patterns for the MyPyramid Food Guidance System. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2006; 38: S78–92.

[212] 212. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service: Agricultural Subsidies.2019.Reference Source

[213] 213. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture - Economic Research Service: U.S. dairy policy.2018.Reference Source

[214] 214. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture: 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.8th Edition.December 2015.Reference Source

[215] 215. Goldfarb G: Manuscript - the Ideal Diet for Humans. OSF. 2021. September 12.Publisher Full Text

[216] 216. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94(4): 1088–96.Publisher Full Text

[217] 217. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, et al.: Changes in red meat consumption and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Three cohorts of US men and women. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(14): 1328–35.Publisher Full Text

[218] 218. Aune D, Ursin G, Veierød MB, et al.: Meat consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetologia 2009; 52: 2277–87.Publisher Full Text

[219] 219. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D, et al.: Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2010; 121(21): 2271–83.Publisher Full Text

The Ideal Diet for Humans to Sustainably Feed the Growing Population – Review, Meta-Analyses, and Policies for Change

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Introduction

Methods

Search strategy

Study selection

Data extraction

Data analysis and statistical methods

Table 1. Individual studies evaluating HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Figure 1. Forest plot of HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Figure 2. Radial plot of HR between meat consumption and mortality.

Table 2. Individual studies evaluating HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Figure 3. Forrest plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Figure 4. Radial plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and mortality.

Table 3. Individual studies evaluating HR between fiber diet and mortality.

Figure 5. Forest plot of HR between a high fiber diet and mortality.

Figure 6. Radial plot of HR between a high fiber diet and mortality.

Table 4. Individual studies evaluating Effect size between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Figure 7. Forest plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Figure 8. Radial plot of HR between plant-based nutrition and diabetes.

Table 5. Individual studies evaluating HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Figure 9. Forest plot of HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Figure 10. Radial plot of HR between vegetarian or Mediterranean diet and heart disease.

Table 6. Individual studies evaluating HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Figure 11. Forest plot of HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Figure 12. Radial plot of HR between IGF-1 and cancer.

Meat consumption and diabetes

Table 7. Individual studies evaluating HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

Figure 13. Forrest plot of HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

Figure 14. Radial plot of HR between meat consumption and diabetes.

Results

Table 8. Aggregate Effect Sizes for Meta-Analyses.

Summary

Policies for change

Discussion

Sugar taxes

Meat and dairy taxes

Figure 15. The distribution of foods in the current USDA food pyramid.

Figure 16. The distribution of foods in the recommended food pyramid.

Conclusions

Glossary of terms

Data availability statement

Underlying data

Reporting guidelines

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated