ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 10 Mar 2021
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Oncology gateway.

Abstract

Acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis (AOSPD) is a rare form of infection primarily arising within the pancreatic duct in the setting of chronic pancreatitis. We present a case of AOSPD precipitated by obstructive adenocarcinoma of pancreatic head in an elderly woman with a past medical history of chronic pancreatitis, alcohol use disorder and, advanced dementia, who developed progressive abdominal pain during her hospital admission for urinary tract infection. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with balloon sweep of pus and stent placement resulted in prompt abdominal pain resolution. Our case highlights a rare presentation of AOSPD as a harbinger of pancreatic malignancy.

Keywords

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, AOSPD, acute suppurative pancreatic ductitis, malignancy, pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, obstruction, sphincterotomy

Introduction

AOSPD, first described in 1995, is a rare consequence of chronic pancreatitis characterized by an acute infection of the pancreatic ducts while sparing pancreatic parenchyma. The distinguishing feature is a lack of pseudocyst, abscess, or necrosis formation. Literature remains sparse in the domain of AOSPD, with a recent literature search only mentioning this entity in over 29 cases to date112. Pancreatic malignancy is also known to promote AOSPD by obstructing pancreaticobiliary secretion outflow ensuing in subsequent infection2,9. We describe a case of AOSPD precipitated by underlying pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old female with a past medical history of chronic alcohol use, chronic pancreatitis and advanced dementia, presented to our tertiary care setup after a fall with confusion, a day after being discharged from an outpatient facility where she had undergone a colonoscopy. Vitals were remarkable for tachycardia (105 beats per minute), blood pressure 90/70 mmHg, temperature of 100.4F and respiratory rate of 18 per minute. On admission, her blood work-up was significant for an elevated white blood count of 12.4k/µL with urinalysis, positive for nitrites, elevated white blood cells, and bacteria. Blood and urine cultures were sent as part of workup for suspected sepsis, and the patient was started on ceftriaxone (2 grams) to cover for suspected sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection, which was considered as a cause of fall and altered mental status at presentation. Ceftriaxone was continued as urine cultures returned positive with the growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with improvement in mentation 24 hours after admission.

However, two days later, the patient developed new onset of progressively worsening, dull epigastric pain with no alleviating or aggravating factors. The pain did not correlate with breathing, position, or food intake. The patient reported that she had for had previous similar abdominal pain episodes six months prior. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was performed, which showed chronic pancreatitis and a 1 cm calculus in the main pancreatic duct; however, we pursued no intervention. She again had an episode two months prior with elevated white cell count, which responded to a short antibiotic course, but no infection source was found. The patient had no fever or hemodynamic instability. Her labs were significant for AST 156, ALT 182, ALP 949, GGT 2859, Bilirubin 1.1, lipase 68. It was noted that AST, ALT, and ALP were elevated at the previous encounter where she had the first episode of abdominal pain, six months before current admission. Blood cultures at the time of presentation had been negative to date.

Due to epigastric pain, an abdominal ultrasound performed showed a 14mm stone in the pancreatic head with a dilated pancreatic, common hepatic and common bile duct (CBD), measuring 11mm, 9mm, and 11mm respectively (Figure 1 and Figure 2). On day 5, the patient’s hemodynamic parameters worsened with a surge in leukocytosis, and thus, transferal to intensive care with a change in antibiotic regimen to vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was made. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed to look for a possible abscess revealed a 3cm obstructive mass in the pancreatic head, suspicious for malignancy with dilation of CBD and pancreatic duct (PD) measuring 16mm and 11mm respectively. CT also demonstrated extensive pancreatic desiccation consistent with the diagnosis of chronic calcific pancreatitis.

e5cc5a7f-5d1f-4429-b26a-c4d04e9c2441_figure1.gif

Figure 1. 14 mm stone in the pancreatic head with dilated duct.

e5cc5a7f-5d1f-4429-b26a-c4d04e9c2441_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Dilated pancreatic duct of 11 mm within the head of pancreas.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed for suspected acute cholangitis secondary to obstruction from pancreatic mass, showing high-grade distal CBD and PD stricture. Sphincterotomy was performed first for the pancreatic duct, then the distal CBD and the stricture in CBD and PD, dilated by using a 4 mm × 4 cm dilating balloon catheter. Upon 4 mm dilation of the PD, a significant amount of pus with debris and stone fragments were extruded. The dilating balloon catheter was removed and a 9–12 mm injecting below retrieval balloon catheter was used to sweep the PD, yielding more pus, debris, and stone fragments. Brushings were obtained from the PD stricture followed by pediatric forceps biopsy of the CBD stricture to rule out malignancy. Subsequently, a 10 Fr × 9 cm biliary stent was placed into the CBD and a 7 Fr × 7 cm stent in the PD with prompt drainage from both stents consistent with the diagnosis of AOSPD (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

e5cc5a7f-5d1f-4429-b26a-c4d04e9c2441_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Balloon sweep of pancreatic duct with removal of pus and sludge.

e5cc5a7f-5d1f-4429-b26a-c4d04e9c2441_figure4.gif

Figure 4. Common bile duct and pancreatic duct stents at the end of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

The patient’s sepsis resolved after the pancreatobiliary drainage with prompt resolution of leukocytosis, transaminitis, and total bilirubin levels. Piperacillin-tazobactam was continued for ten days. Biopsy and brushings confirmed hepatobiliary primary invasive adenocarcinoma. Given the grave prognosis, palliative care was proposed. The patient opted for home hospice care.

Discussion

AOSPD is a very rare entity and its mention in literature is sparse. AOSPD presentation overlaps with cholangitis and this mimicry makes misdiagnosis or non-recognition as a separate clinical entity difficult. AOSPD presentation varies from acute to chronic, the most common symptom being abdominal pain15,812. Less commonly, it may also present as sepsis or septic shock14. However, the presence of infection does not always correlate with clinical manifestation. This was evident from cases of asymptomatic presentation, where lab work uncovered the underlying infection incidentally6,7. Pancreatic imaging plays a pivotal role. The main pancreatic duct diameter was significantly higher in AOSPD with Chronic Pancreatitis (CP) than Acute-on-Chronic Pancreatitis patients10. AOSPD as the initial presentation of pancreatic malignancy is reported only once before, besides our case10.

The presence of pancreatic ductal stones precipitated due to pancreatic secretion stasis also serves as a nidus of infection generation leading to septicemia15. Besides enteric pathogens, respiratory pathogens have been increasingly reported in association with AOSPD, especially Klebsiella3,5. In our case, the pancreatic fluid and urinary cultures grew Klebsiella of the same species; however, no bacteremia was present.

The mainstay of AOSPD diagnosis is through ERCP detection of purulent discharge from the main pancreatic duct, seen in the absence of associated lesions like an abscess or pancreatic pseudocyst. MRCP presumptively diagnosed one case by demonstrating pancreatic duct dilation. However, the diagnosis was still confirmed after ERCP lead to symptom resolution2.

Treatment is through source control via ERCP drainage and appropriate antibiotic administration. Notably, endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage (ENPD) was additionally performed following ERCP in one reported case11. At this time, there are no established guidelines for the duration of therapy. Broad-spectrum antibiotic with enteric anaerobic coverage (vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime with gentamicin) given for 7–14 days, is the mainstay of therapy16.

AOSPD is a rare and potentially fatal diagnosis that requires expeditious recognition and treatment with referral to a facility with ERCP capabilities and expert infectious disease management. Future reviews and studies should work toward universal guidance in management.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Mar 2021
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Sheikh T, Waqar SHB, Burlen J et al. Case Report: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:199 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.29992.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Mar 2021
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Jul 2021
Andreas Minh Luu, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Gudrunstrasse, Bochum, 44791, Germany 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
Dear authors,

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review this nicely written manuscript. I would suggest minor revisions prior to acceptance of the manuscript.

First of all, what was the primary underlying ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Luu AM. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:199 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.33042.r89297)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
13
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Jul 2021
Shehzeen Fatima Memon, Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan 
Approved
VIEWS 13
The report is well-written and well presented with a firm approach towards the diagnosis from the beginning to the end. Being a rare case, authors have thoroughly covered the appropriate investigations, diagnostic measures and treatments that need to be carried ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Memon SF. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:199 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.33042.r89568)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Mar 2021
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.