Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, anti-vinculin, anti-CdtB, Rome IV
irritable bowel syndrome, anti-vinculin, anti-CdtB, Rome IV
The OD was added to all sections of the study as it was the correct used unit
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Simon Keely
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Gabriela Leite
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gut disorder that affects approximately 11% of the global population.1,2 IBS mainly manifests in subjects with abdominal pain with bowel habit changes in the absence of either radiological evidence of associated pathological conditions or detectable chemical and physiological abnormalities. The diagnosis of this clinical condition relies upon Rome criteria.3–7
The Rome working team recommended classifying subjects with IBS into different sub-groups depending on their bowel habits changes predominance. The IBS sub-groups included IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), Mixed IBS (IBS-M), and Un-subtyped IBS.3
To understand the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), previous studies have developed a rat model utilizing infection with Campylobacter jejuni in order to elicit a post-infection phenotype resembling human post-infection IBS (PI-IBS) characterized by apparent changes in the composition of small intestinal microbiota.8,9 In these studies, progression to IBS was accompanied by the detection of a specific bacterial toxin named cytolethal distending toxin B (CdtB), a potential factor attributing to the pathogenesis of PI-IBS. Experimental studies suggested a low incidence of IBS when infected with a mutant strain of C. jejuni that lacks CdtB.8,10
Furthermore, the development of antibodies to CdtB was associated with altering gut microbiota associated with reducing specific interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC).11,12 These findings were linked to the ability of anti-CdtB to cross-react with vinculin, a host cell adhesion protein present in interstitial cells of Cajal and the myenteric ganglia that control the normal activity of the intestinal tract, including phase III of inter-digestive motor activity.13 Absence or decrease in phase III contractions results in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in animal models and human patients with IBS.14,15 In this sense, autoimmunity may profoundly affect the host immune response to infections with C. jejuni, subsequently leading to IBS.16,17 Based on these data, it has been suggested that loss of vinculin in the neuromuscular system of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may be associated with the affection of the gut in animal models of post-infection C. jejuni. Detection of circulating levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used to identify patients with IBS-D,18 and to differentiate it from other IBS subtypes.19 However, it should be noted that the idea of a specific IBS microbiome is someone controversial with larger studies analysing mucosal microbiomes showing now distinct signature.20
The present study aims to detect and quantify anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin levels in subjects with IBS and their possible role in diagnosing different IBS subtypes.
This was a retrospective case-control study comprising 100 adult patients aged >18 years with IBS, recruited from the Tropical Medicine Department's outpatient clinics at Mansoura University Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020, and 100 healthy subjects with matched gender and age as a control group.
Patients were recruited and IBS determined by a questionnaire-based upon the Rome III criteria, then classified according to their predominant stool composition over 25% of the time: into IBS-C (hard or lumpy stools), IBS-D (loose and watery stools), or IBS-M (a mix of both types).19 Exclusion criteria included patients with hepatic, renal, or autoimmune diseases, those with history of inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal surgeries, thyroid disorders, diabetes mellitus, and patients with a history of taking antibiotics in the last 30 days.
A 10 ml blood sample was obtained from each subject, which was then divided into three aliquots. Two aliquots were used to determine complete blood counts, and one aliquot was utilized for serum separation to assess complete liver function tests, including alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, total bilirubin, total albumin, and the kidney function test creatinine. The third aliquot was overlaid on heparin for plasma separation, and the remaining sera were stored at -20°C to be used for evaluation of anti-vinculin antibodies by laboratory prepared ELISA and anti-CdtB antibodies by commercial ELISA (Creative Diagnostics. 45-16 Ramsey Road Shirley, NY 11967, USA).
Anti-vinculin levels were measured in separated plasma using human vinculin protein in a concentration of 1.2 μg/ml (Novoprotein Scientific, Summit, New Jersey, USA) as an antigen. The vinculin was used to coat wells of the plate following overnight incubation in the wells at 4°C with 100 mmol/l borate buffered saline AQ4 at a pH of 8.2 (Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction was blocked by using BSA 3% and incubating for one hour at room temperature, then washing three times with 0.05% PBS and Tween 20 (pH 7.4). Plasma was added after a 1:32 dilution in saline, then antibodies for vinculin (R and D Systems Cat# MAB6896, RRID:AB_10992930), were added as positive control and incubated for one hour at room temperature followed by washing three times with 0.05% PBS and Tween 20 (pH 7.4). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Millipore–Merck) were added and incubated for one hour at room temperature. After washing, a tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution (BioRad) was used for detection using a micro-plate reader (stat Fax-1200; Awareness Technology, Florida, USA). Optical densities (ODs) were read at 370nm, and the results were interpreted as OD.12
The ELISA was used to determine the anti-CdTB of C. jejuni using the recombinant Campylobacter CdtB protein (https://www.creativebiomart.net/description_436265_12.htm). The protein was used as antigens immobilized at the wells of the 96 microplates overnight at 4 C with a concentration of 1.2 μg/mL prepared in borate buffer saline to obtain PH 8.2. Negative wells were prepared by adding only borate buffer saline. After overnight incubation, the reaction was blocked by adding bovine albumin with a concentration of 3% prepared in phosphate buffer and incubated at room temperature for one hour. Then the plate was used to determine anti-CdtB in the serum samples with dilution 1:512, and anti-CdtB antibodies) were used as positive controls (https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/search.aspx?pageid=1&keys=CdtB&status=0&fl=ELISA%257e&flt=2,&cid=4). The plate was incubated for one hour at room temperature. The wells were then washed three times with phosphate buffer, and then horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were added to the wells and incubated for one hour at room temperature. TMB turns blue in peroxidase reaction and finally turns yellow under the action of acid. Optical densities (ODs) were read at 450. The OD values were used for the data analysis.
Data are reported as means and standard deviation (SD) or counts and percentages when appropriate. Comparisons between groups were made using t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, Chi-square, or Fisher exact tests dictated by data type and distribution.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences between more than two groups. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses in this study. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
This study included 100 patients with IBS (49 males and 51 females) aged 46.6 ± 6.8 years and 100 healthy controls with a statistically insignificant difference between patients and control regarding age and sex (P = 0.8 and P = 0.6, respectively). Patients were classified according to Rome III criteria into 40 patients with IBS-C, 26 patients with IBS-D, and 34 patients with IBS-M (Figure 1). Laboratory investigations, including ALT, AST, albumin, total bilirubin, hemoglobin, total leucocytes count, platelets, and creatinine, showed non-significant differences between patients and control subjects (P = 0.6, P = 0.5, P = 0.7, P = 0.6, P = 0.99, P = 0.99, and P = 0.58) respectively (Table 1).
The OD of the anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB levels were significantly elevated in IBS patients (1.58 ± 0.496ng/ml and 2.47 ± 0.60 ng/ml) respectively compared to the control subjects (1.13 ± 0.249 ng/ml and 2.1 ± 0.24 ng/ml) respectively with P = 0.001 for both (Table 2).
Parameter | Patients with IBS (Mean ± SD) | Control Subjects (Mean ± SD) | P |
---|---|---|---|
Anti-vinculin | 1.58 ± 0.496 | 1.13 ± 0.249 | 0.001 |
Anti-CdtB | 2.47 ± 0.60 | 2.1 ± 0.24 | 0.001 |
Anti-vinculin levels were also significantly higher in different IBS subgroups compared to control subjects, with the anti-vinculin level being significantly elevated in the IBS-D subtype when compared to the other subtypes with P = 0.001. Similarly, anti-CdtB showed significant elevation in IBS-C and IBS-D compared to control subjects (P = 0.001), with a significantly higher level detected in IBS-D than IBS-C (P = 0.001). However, the level of anti-CdtB in IBS-M was detected at a non-significant lower level compared to control subjects (P = 0.2), but at a significantly lower level when compared to IBS-C and IBS-D (P = 0.001) (Table 3).
There is an extreme necessity for the utilization of accessible and reliable, low-cost biomarkers to avoid unnecessary routine use of colonoscopy in diagnosing IBS in low-risk population with age <50 years, no history of GIT bleeding, nocturnal passage of stool, weight loss, familial history of inflammatory bowel diseases or colorectal cancer, recent bowel habits changes, and/or the presence of abdominal masses or lymaphadenopathy.1,20 Previous studies reported that anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin might be valuable noninvasive biomarkers to identify IBS patients21,22 in different populations. However, these biomarkers have not been sufficiently evaluated in Egyptian patients.
In the current study, both anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB demonstrated significantly elevated levels in IBS patients when compared to the control subjects, a finding that mirrors those from a previous study by Talley et al.23 However, data reported by Rezaie et al.16 depicts significant elevation in levels of both biomarkers only in IBS-M and IBS-D, but not IBS-C. This discrepancy in findings may be attributed to the difference in etiology of different IBS subtypes,4 as it is hypothesized that most cases of post-infectious IBS manifest as IBS-D or IBS-M, with a minority of patients manifesting as IBS-C.9 Another factor may make the microbiome profile difference between IBS patient subgroups; bacterial species producing methane are decreased in IBS-D and IBS-M23 and increased in IBS-C.24 Patients included in the present study, particularly those in the IBS-C subgroup, may represent patients who develop IBS following infections associated with their microbiota profile changes. These findings need extensive longitudinal studies to be confirmed.
Anti-vinculin and anti-CdtB levels in this study were significantly elevated in patients with IBS-D, a concordance finding with Pimentel et al., who reported that anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin distinguished IBS-D from IBD, other organic GI diseases and healthy control. In addition, Bayoumy et al.24 reported that anti-vinculin could be an important biomarker for IBS-D diagnosis among Egyptian patients. Cytolethal distending toxin represents a virulence factor for bacterial pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter jejuni, by causing epithelial barrier breakdown and suppression of the acquired immune response to invading pathogens, resulting in an amplified pro-inflammatory response with consequent persistence of bacterial infection.16 Development of anti-CdtB antibodies occurs in response to secretion of cytolethal distending toxin following infection with bacterial pathogens. Molecular mimicry accounts for the potential cross-reaction between anti-CdtB and vinculin with resultant anti-vinculin autoantibody production leading to injury to interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) with the development of IBS.12 Based on the suggestion of an association between the metabolic syndrome and liver affection and IBS, this study group performed liver function tests as a simple evaluation of liver affection. However, liver enzymes were normal in IBS patients' studied group, in contrast to reports by Lee et al.26
In the present study there was no history of previous infection with C. jejuni. However, the elevated levels of antiCdtB and antivinculin can be used as biomarkers for diagnosis of IBS either post infections or without previous infection. The data of the present study supports that PI IBS may be more common than it is realized.26
The principal limitation of the present study was the lack of psychological measures in combination with the measurement of the serological biomarkers as these measures are a valuable tool in the diagnosis of IBS compared to healthy controls as reported previously.27
The present findings support the hypothesis that IBS may results from post-infectious bacterial gastroenteritis. Moreover, this hypothesis can be applied to all IBS subgroups as both anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin biomarkers were significantly elevated in IBS-C and IBS-D subgroups, with only anti-vinculin being elevated in IBS-M when compared to healthy control. These may signify the role of infection in such subgroup of IBS patients. These findings need further extensive longitudinal studies in patients with IBS.
All participants provided written informed consent and the study was conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Confidentiality and privacy were considered regarding personal, clinical and laboratory data.
Mansoura Faculty of Medicine Institutional Research Board approved the research (R.21.01.1141).
Figshare: “Study of antibodies to cytolethal distending toxin B (CdtB) and antibodies to vinculin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome” https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14178908.v1.28
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0
The authors are thankful for Mansoura Faculty of Medicine for providing laboratory to perform this work.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Drug development, test development for diagnosis of antibodies and antigens associated with bacterial diseases.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastroenterology, mucosal inflammation, immunology, microbiome, functional GI disorders.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Drug development, test development for diagnosis of antibodies and antigens associated with bacterial diseases.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Drug development, test development for diagnosis of antibodies and antigens associated with bacterial diseases.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastroenterology, mucosal inflammation, immunology, microbiome, functional GI disorders.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Hugerth LW, Andreasson A, Talley NJ, Forsberg AM, et al.: No distinct microbiome signature of irritable bowel syndrome found in a Swedish random population.Gut. 69 (6): 1076-1084 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Gastroenterology, mucosal inflammation, immunology, microbiome, functional GI disorders.
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Drug development, test development for diagnosis of antibodies and antigens associated with bacterial diseases.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 4 (revision) 15 Oct 21 |
read | |
Version 3 (revision) 23 Aug 21 |
read | read |
Version 2 (revision) 30 Jun 21 |
read | read |
Version 1 19 Apr 21 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)