The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats

Adibah Maulani; Cendrawasih Andusyana Farmasyanti; Darmawan Sutantyo

doi:10.12688/f1000research.53728.3

Home Browse The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats

[version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]

Adibah Maulani ¹, Cendrawasih Andusyana Farmasyanti ², Darmawan Sutantyo²

PUBLISHED 13 Jun 2022

Author details Author details

¹ Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
² Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia

Adibah Maulani
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Cendrawasih Andusyana Farmasyanti
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Darmawan Sutantyo
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth. Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. This study aimed to determine the number of osteoblasts in the tension side and the number of osteoclasts in the pressure side of the hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. Method: 18 male Wistar rats were given a palatal coil spring application on the maxillary incisors. Rats were divided into two groups, the orthodontic group with normal occlusion (NO) and hypofunctional occlusion (HO). The number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side on days zero (D₀), five (D₅), and 10 (D₁₀) were tested with two-way ANOVA. Observations were made by hematoxylin eosin staining.
Result: The results showed that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the HO group was the same at the NO group (p> 0.05). The number of osteoblasts on the tension side in the NO and HO groups at D₅ was the same at D₁₀ (p = 0.99), but significantly higher (p = 0.002), than D_0. The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side in the HO group was significantly lower than the NO group (p <0.05). The number of osteoclasts in the NO D₅ group was significantly higher than the other groups (p <0.05).
Conclusions: The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement.

Keywords

Tooth movement, osteoblast, osteoclast, hypofunctional

Corresponding authors: Adibah Maulani, Cendrawasih Andusyana Farmasyanti

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: Public funding 2019 of Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2022 Maulani A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Maulani A, Farmasyanti CA and Sutantyo D. The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 10:541 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.3) First published: 06 Jul 2021, 10:541 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.1) Latest published: 13 Jun 2022, 10:541 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.3)

Revised Amendments from Version 2

This new version includes some minor changes in the detail of background, method sections, discussion, result, and references.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Erliera Sufarnap
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Masaru Yamaguchi

Introduction

Tooth movement in orthodontic treatment is a biological response to mechanical forces characterized by remodeling processes in dental and paradental tissue, including pulp tissue, periodontal ligaments, alveolar bone, and gingiva.¹ Osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes play an essential role in bone remodeling in orthodontic tooth movement.²

Clinicians often encounter cases which need to move the teeth that functionally never have occlusal pressure or hypofunctional teeth, such as open bite, ectopic canine, linguioversion and bucoversion teeth.³ Open bite malocclusion occurs when maxillary and mandibular teeth are not in contact.⁴ Hypofunctional teeth cause atrophic changes in the periodontal ligament, a decrease in the number of periodontal fibers and blood vessels, and the periodontal space’s narrowing. Periodontal space’s narrowing occurs due to the apposition of the alveolar bone by an increase in Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ), causing tooth elongation.⁵ Changes in the paradental structure of hypofunctional teeth cause different reactions when orthodontically moved than normal teeth, especially in periodontal ligament tissue. Hypofunctional teeth when orthodontically moved have less heparan sulfate proteoglycan exposure, which plays a role in the osteoclastic activity, compared to normal teeth.⁵ Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in hypofunctional teeth also decreases during orthodontic movement leading to vascular constriction and endothelial cell apoptosis. The expression of VEGF has an important role in the resorption and apposition processes of alveolar bone because it affects the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro.⁶ Based on some researchs about hypofunctional teeth, hypotheses were formulated as follows, the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement, there is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement, and the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. Research on the number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic movement has never been done before. This study aimed to determine the number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side on hypofunctional teeth, respectively, during orthodontic tooth movement.

Wistar rats are considered a good research model for this study into orthodontic tooth movement because rats are cheap, making them easy to use as a large quantity sample, and the histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans’, and is easy to install the orthodontic appliance into.⁷

Methods

Ethical considerations

All experimental procedures were performed according to the Institutional Animal Care and Usage Committee (ARRIVE guidelines). The Ethical Clearance was approved by Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry of Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, Indonesia, with Ethical Clearance number 00288/KKEP/FKG-UGM/EC/2019. All procedures involving rats were carried out with consideration to eliminate any suffering in the rats by using anesthetic drugs and euthanasia procedures during rats’ tissue collection.

Animals

This study used 18 five-month-old, male, healthy rats weighing ± 400 grams, which had never been used in any procedures before. Male Wistar rats were choosen to avoid hormonal influences during orthodontic tooth movement.⁸ Rats adapted beforehand for seven days on a standard diet, including pellets. Rats were placed in cages at room temperature, which was 26C. Inclusion criteria related to body weight, sex, age, and health condition of the rats. Exclusion criteria included any technical issues that could disrupt orthodontic tooth movement, such as trapped bonding inside palatal coil.

Experimental animals were divided into two groups: the normal occlusion (NO) and the hypofunctional occlusion group (HO), both were moved orthodontically. This study was done without a control group in order to examine orthodontic tooth movement with and without occlusion over a period of time. In the HO group, the mandibular left incisors were cut to the gingival margin level every two days to obtain consistent spacing throughout the study. Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. The sample size was determined using the Federer formula. Each group consisted of three rats with three groups of observation days: day zero (D0), day five (D5), and day 10 (D10). Rats were allocated to their groups using a simple randomization method: each rat was labelled, and a blindfolded researcher drew corresponding labels from a hat for each group. Researchers were aware of which group was which during the experiment.

Procedures

Animals were anesthetized using 10% ketamine 35 mg/kg and 2% xylazine 5 mg/kg intramuscularly during spring installation and reduction of left lower incisor. The upper incisors were separated using a customized palatal coil spring of 0.012 mm stainless steel wire (Ortho Prime Inc. USA: A 85021201; orthoshape SS 0,012”) connected to two metal bands (Dentaurum) with the arm length is 5 mm and the coil diameter is 2 mm. The customized coil spring was deflected for 3.4 mm to deliver an orthodontic force of 17.5 cN per upper incisor before being installed.⁹ The palatal coil spring was cemented using GIC Fuji IX, as shown in Figure 1. Then the left lower incisor was cut.

Figure 1.

Installation of a palatal coil spring on rat incisors accompanied by reduction of lower incisors.

All experimental animals in day zero, day five, and day 10 groups were euthanized using an overdose solution of ketamine and xylazine (lethal dose: ketamine (KEPRO.BV production), 300 mg/kg BW and brand xylazine (Xyla) 30 mg/kg BW) intraperitoneally. Cross sections were taken on alveolar crest region of the upper incisor, shown in Figure 2. The number of osteoblasts were counted on the tension side and osteoclasts were counted on the pressure side using hematoxylin eosin staining and observed using an optical microscope (Olympus CX-22) with 400 times magnification in three fields of view every slide. Osteoblast cells appear cuboidal or columnar, purple, and single-nucleated.¹⁰ Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae.¹¹

Figure 2.

Alveolar crest region of the upper incisor where cross-section was taken shown in the black rectangle.

Statisical analysis

The program used to perform statistical analysis was SPSS version 17.0 for Windows. Cohen’s Kappa test value from two observers showed more than 0.50, which means there was good agreement between the two observers. The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. All data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The research data were then analyzed using the two-way ANOVA test followed by the Post Hoc test, Multiple Comparison (LSD). The confidence level used in this study is 95%.

Results

The results in Table 1 show that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of HO group is higher than NO group, but the difference is not significant (p = 0.187). The number of osteoblasts in NO group increased significantly on day five (p = 0.002) and continued to increase until day 10, as seen in Table 2. However, the increase number of osteoblast from day five to day 10 was not significant (p = 0.99).

Table 1.

Mean of osteoblasts on the tension side (cells/field).

Group	Mean ± SD
Group	D₀	D₅	D₁₀
NO	60.66 ± 9.50	112.33 ± 14.84	116 ± 18.24
HO	80.33 ± 9.50	124 ± 19.15	123 ± 38.93

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviations; NO, normal occlusion group; HO, hypofunctional occlusions group; D₀, day zero; D₅, day five; D₁₀, day 10.

Table 2.

Post Hoc LSD of osteoblasts on the tension side in each observation day.

Group	D₀	D₅	D₁₀
D₀	-	0.002*	0.002*
D₅	-	-	0.990
D₁₀	-	-	-

Abbreviations: D₀, day zero; D₅, day five; D₁₀, day 10.

* Significant p value.

The highest number of osteoblasts on the tension side was seen in HO group on day five. The lowest number of osteoblasts on the tension side was seen in NO group on day zero.

The number of osteoblasts in NO group (A) and the number of osteoblasts in HO group (B) in the tension side during tooth movement is shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 showed the number of osteoclasts in NO (C) and HO groups (D) in the pressure side during orthodontic treatment.

Figure 3. Osteoblast cells (arrow) of NO group (A) and osteoblast cells of HO group (B) in the tension side during orthodontic tooth movement.

AB: Alveolar Bone, PDL: Periodontal Ligament.

Figure 4. Osteoclast cells (arrows) of NO group (C) and osteoclast cells of HOgroup (D) in pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement.

AB: Alveolar Bone, PDL: Periodontal Ligament.

The results in Table 3 showed that the number of osteoclasts in HO group was significantly lower than NO group on each day of observation (p = 0.014). The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement in NO group began to significantly increase until day five (p = 0.011), as seen in Table 4, then decreased on day 10 (p = 0.004). This pattern was the same as in HO group, which increased until day five, then decreased on day 10. The highest number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was seen in NO group on day five.

Table 3.

Mean of osteoclasts on the pressure side (cells/field).

Group	Mean ± SD
Group	D₀	D₅	D₁₀
NO	1.33 ± 1.52	4 ± 2	0.67 ± 0.577
HO	0	1.33 ± 1.15	0

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviations; NO, normal occlusion group; HO, hypofunctional occlusions group; D₀, day zero; D₅, day five; D₁₀, day 10.

Table 4.

Post Hoc LSD of osteoclasts on the pressure side in each observation day.

Group	D₀	D₅	D₁₀
D₀	-	0.011*	0.626
D₅	-	-	0.004*
D₁₀	-	-	-

Abbreviations: D₀, day zero; D₅, day five; D₁₀, day 10.

* Significant p value.

The results in Table 5 showed that rate of orthodontic tooth movement in NO group was increase from day zero to day 10, but the increase was not significant. The rate of orthodontic tooh movement in HO group was significantly increase from day zero to day five, but than decrease on day 10. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement on day 10 was higher in NO than HO group, but this difference was not significant.

Table 5.

Mean of orthodontic tooth movement rate (mm).

Group	Mean ± SD
Group	D₀	D₅	D₁₀
NO	6.10 ± 0.06	6.20 ± 0.20	6.44 ± 0.09
HO	5.78 ± 0.36	6.66 ± 0.23	6.06 ± 0.20

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviations; NO, normal occlusion group; HO, hypofunctional occlusions group; D₀, day zero; D₅, day five; D₁₀, day 10.

Discussion

The study showed that the number of osteoblasts in NO group had increased significantly on day five and then showed no significant difference until day 10, as seen in Table 2. This result was in line with Herniyati’s¹² research, which stated that the formation of preosteoblasts from mesenchymal cells had occurred 10 hours after applying force, followed by the differentiation of osteoblasts 40–48 hours later. The maximum number of osteoblast was reached on the 6th day of orthodontic tooth movement.¹³ This osteoblast differentiation and proliferation lasted up to 10 days.¹⁴

The increasing number of osteoblasts on the tension side during 10 days of observation occurs because in the early phase of orthodontic tooth movement there will be an acute inflammatory response characterized by periodontal tissue vasodilation and prostaglandin secretion and growth factors such as TGFβ.¹ TGFβ is also produced by fibroblasts on the tension side. TGFβ is an important factor in osteoblastogenesis and bone formation by recruiting osteoblast progenitors and stimulating the differentiation of bone matrix. An increase in TGFβ will increase osteoblast proliferation on the tension side.¹⁵ This acute inflammatory response will lead to an increasing number of osteoblasts in the early phase. One to two days later, the acute phase of inflammation is replaced by a chronic inflammatory process that is more proliferative, involving fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and osteoblasts.¹

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side during orthodontic movement of teeth with normal occlusion is influenced by several growth factors that are sensitive to mechanical stimuli, such as the expression of TGFβ, VEGF, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF). Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation.¹⁶ The increase in growth factor on the tension side will cause an increase in the number of osteoblasts. Hypofunctional teeth, without orthodontic force, will experience an increase in TGFβ expression, which simultaneously decreases VEGF, IGF, and FGF expression in the periodontal tissue.⁵^,⁶^,¹⁷^,¹⁸ Transforming Growth Factor β has a role in stimulating osteoblast differentiation and osteoclast apoptosis.⁵ Decreased FGF will lead to osteoblast differentiation in hypofunctional teeth because FGF works to inhibit osteoblast differentiation.¹⁸ The decrease in IGF causes a decrease in osteoblast proliferation because IGF is dominant in providing osteogenic effects.¹⁹

Teeth that are hypofunctional when moved orthodontically will tend to experience decreased VEGF expression on both the tension and pressure sides.⁶ Decreased VEGF expression will cause apoptosis of endothelial cells, causing vascular constriction and decreased permeability. This will reduce the migration of osteoblasts on the tension side.⁶ Increased TGFβ and decreased FGF in hypofunctional teeth will increase osteoblasts.

The results showed the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth was the same as normal teeth during orthodontic movement (p > 0.05). This was possible because before orthodontic movement there was an increase in osteoblasts due to the interaction of increasing TGFβ and decreasing FGF and IGF, but simultaneously when hypofunctional teeth were given orthodontic force, there was a decrease in VEGF which tended to decrease osteoblast differentiation and migration, so that the number of osteoblasts became the same as the normal group. This needs further research.

The results showed the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of NO group began to increase on the first day after the installation of a palatal coil spring and continued increasing until the fifth day, then decreased. on day 10. This result was almost the same as in the hypofunctional group, which increased up to day five, then decreased on day 10. This result is in line with the study by Miyoshi²⁰ which states that orthodontic movements immediately after force application are almost absent in osteoclasts. After the third day of mechanical strength application, several osteoclasts appeared. The maximum number of osteoclasts was reached on day six of orthodontic tooth movement.¹² The increase in osteoclasts on day three was in line with the increase in VEGF expression, which also increased sharply.²¹

An increasing number of osteoclasts occur because, in the early phase, the mechanical stress in the compression area will stimulate mechanoreceptors on osteocytes and cause changes in flow and blood vessels, causing tissue hypoxia that activates VEGF.²² VEGF plays an essential role in the angiogenesis process in the area of hyalinization.²¹ VEGF also plays a role in vascular permeability and activates endothelial cells. Active endothelial cells in the area of compression will cause chemoattraction of acute inflammatory cells such as leukocytes, monocytes, and macrophages. Leukocytes will stimulate prostaglandins and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). Increased prostaglandins in the area of compression will stimulate osteoblast differentiation and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) expression, whereas M-CSF can induce osteoclast differentiation by attaching to the c-Fms receptor on monocytic lineage cells. RANKL and M-CSF play an essential role in the process of osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption.²²

The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side in HO group was smaller than NO occlusion group on each observation day. This result was probably because VEGF expression in hypofunctional teeth decreases during orthodontic movement leading to vascular constriction and endothelial cell apoptosis.⁶ Endothelial cell apoptosis will cause decreased osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption.²² The decrease in VEGF will also cause a decrease in vascular permeability so that it will significantly imply a decrease in the number of osteoclasts.²³

Orthodontic tooth movement involves osteoblastic activity on the tension side and osteoclastic activity on the pressure side.¹ The decrease in the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side in the orthodontic tooth movement of this HO group suggests a possible decrease in the rate of orthodontic tooth movement The research of Usumi-Fujita⁶ states that there is a decrease in the rate of orthodontic movement in hypofunctional teeth. However, the rate of orthodontic tooth movement from this study showed that on day 10, there was no significant difference between HO and NO group. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth need further research.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. The number of osteoclasts in HO group is lower compared to NO group during orthodontic tooth movement. It is possible that this is because of the decrease in VEGF and heparan sulfate proteoglycan.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: The Number of Osteoclast and Osteoblast in Hypofunctonal Teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14515740.v10.

This project contains the following underlying data:

• osteoclasts.xlsx
• osteoblasts.xlsx
• table of statistic analysis.docx
• Figure 1.jpg
• Figure 2.jpg
• Figure 3 A.jpg
• Figure 3 B.jpg
• Figure 4 C.jpg
• Figure 4 D.jpg

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: ARRIVE Checklist, Maulani et al. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14515740.v8.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

1. Khrisnan V, Davidovitch Z: Cellular, Molecular, and Tissue-level Reactions to Orthodontic Force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(4): 469.e1–469.e32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Maleeh I, Robinson J, Wadhwa S: Role of Alveolar Bone in Mediating Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Relapse. Biology of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Springer, Switzerland;2016; 1–12. Publisher Full Text
3. Esashika M, Kaneko S, Yanagishita M, et al.: Influence of Orthodontic Forces on the Distribution of Proteoglycans in Rat Hypofunctional Periodontal Ligament. J Med Dent Sci. 2003; 50(2): 183–194. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Tasanapanont J, Wattanachai T, Apisariyakul J, et al.: Biochemical and Clinical Assessments of Segmental Maxillary Posterior Tooth Intrusion. Int J Dent. 2017; 2017(2689642): 2689642. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
5. Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016; 3(1): 1–8. Publisher Full Text
6. Usumi-Fujita R, Hosomichi J, Ono N, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Causes Periodontal Atrophy and VEGF/VEGFR Inhibition in Tooth Movement. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(1): 48–56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
7. Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM: The Rat as A Model for Orthodontic Tooth Movement--A Critical Review and A Proposed Solution. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(5): 483–490. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Beery AK: Inclusion of females does not increase variability in rodent research studies. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018; 23: 143–149. Publisher Full Text
9. Farmasyanti CA, Kujipers-Jagtman AM, Susilowati H, et al.: Effects of Pentagamavunon-0 (PGV-0) as Alternative Analgesics on Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Rats. Padjajaran J Dentistry. 2019; 31(3): 152–160. Publisher Full Text
10. Alhasyimi AA, Pudyani PP, Asmara W, et al.: Enhancement of post-orthodontic tooth stability by carbonated hydroxyapatite-incorporated advanced platelet-rich fibrin in rabbits. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2018; 21(2): 112–118. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, et al.: Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 421746. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
12. Herniyati H: The increased number of osteoblasts and capillaries in orthodontic tooth movement post-administration of Robusta coffee extract. Dental J (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi). 2017; 50(2): 91–96. Publisher Full Text
13. Arias OR, Marquez-Orozco MC: Aspirin, Acetaminophen, and Ibuprofen:Their Effects on Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(3): 364–370. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
14. d’Apuzzo F, Cappabianca S, Ciavarella D, et al.: Biomarkers of Periodontal Tissue Remodeling during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice and Men: Overview and Clinical Relevance. Sci World J. 2013; 2013: 105873. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
15. Indriasari V, Suparwitri S, Christnawati C, et al.: Different Effects of Soybean Isoflavone Genistein on Transforming Growth Factor Levels during Orthodontic Tooth Movement among Young and Old Rabbits [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Res. 2019: 8: 2074. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
16. Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M: Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Reference Source
17. Termsuknirandorn S, Hosomichi J, Soma K: Occlusal Stimuli Influence on the Expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1 Receptor in the Rat Periodontal Ligament. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4): 610–616. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
18. Boonpratham S, Kanno S, Soma K: Occlusal Stimuli Regulate interleukin-1 beta and FGF-2 Expression in Rat Periodontal Ligament. J Med Dent Sci. 2007; 54(1): 71–77. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
19. Tokimasa C, Kawata T, Fujita T, et al.: Effects of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice. Arch Oral Biol. 2003; 48(1): 31–38. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
20. Miyoshi K, Igarashi K, Saeki S, et al.: Tooth Movement and Changes in Periodontal Tissue in Response to Orthodontic Force in Rats Vary Depending on the Time of Day the Force is Applied. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23(4): 329–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Salomão MFL, Reis SR, Vale VLC, et al.: Immunolocalization of FGF-2 and VEGF in Rat Periodontal Ligament During Experimental Tooth Movement. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014; 19(3): 67–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
22. Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH: Orthodontic Tooth Movement:The Biology and Clinical Implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018; 34(4): 207–214. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
23. Kaku M, Kohno S, Kawata T, et al.: Effects of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Osteoclast Induction during Tooth Movement in Mice. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(10): 1880–1883. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
24. Maulani A: The Number of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in Hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. figshare, Thesis. 2021. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 06 Jul 2021

Author details Author details

Darmawan Sutantyo
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

Public funding 2019 of Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (3)

version 3

Revised

Published: 13 Jun 2022, 10:541

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 29 Apr 2022, 10:541

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.2

version 1

Published: 06 Jul 2021, 10:541

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.1

© 2022 Maulani A et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Maulani A, Farmasyanti CA and Sutantyo D. The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 10:541 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53728.3)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 3

VERSION 3

PUBLISHED 13 Jun 2022

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 21 Nov 2024

Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Discipline of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Narayan Gandedkar, School of Dentistry, Orthodontics, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health (Ringgold ID: 522555), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134578.r322700

This is a scientifically sound and good study and it has been reviewed twice, already. I have some points that will need further explanation.
Material and methodology

Why was the study limited for 10 days?

This is a scientifically sound and good study and it has been reviewed twice, already. I have some points that will need further explanation.
Material and methodology

Why was the study limited for 10 days? The rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) would be affected if less days are selected instead of more. Although, osteoblast differentiation and proliferation might last up to 10 days (due to acute inflammatory response). It would be interesting in knowing whether the results of the current study remained the same beyond 10 days. This phenomenon should be explained in the context of days and OTM, and the hypofunctional condition.
17.5 cN used per incisor should be explained further regarding undermining resorption. The reference used in the study is for inflammatory response study. Generally, a very low force is used for OTM study.

Discuss the current limitations of the study.

Other biomarkers for OTM
compression–tension theory limitations in the light of other theories and current understanding of OTM
Immunostaining Vs H & E staining (current study) method.

Authors need to add and discuss the following articles:
Reference: 1, 2

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

References

1. Motokawa M, Terao A, Karadeniz EI, Kaku M, et al.: Effects of long-term occlusal hypofunction and its recovery on the morphogenesis of molar roots and the periodontium in rats.Angle Orthod. 2013; 83 (4): 597-604 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Motokawa M, Terao A, Kaku M, Kawata T, et al.: Open bite as a risk factor for orthodontic root resorption.Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35 (6): 790-5 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Orthodontics, tooth movement, root resorption, obstructive sleep apnea, accelerated tooth movement, jaw orthopedics

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 19 Nov 2024

Janvier Habumugisha, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134578.r339215

Abstract
Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper. The author aimed to determine the number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side of hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. The manuscript shows potential and is well-structured; however, the following points require further clarification:

Please ensure that all abbreviations are written out in full upon first usage. Specifically, in the abstract, define 'VEGF' before using the abbreviation. This will enhance clarity and accessibility for readers who may be unfamiliar with the terminology

The sentence in abstract, the sentence, 'The results showed that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the HO group was the same at the NO group (p > 0.05),' please note that 'at' should be replaced with 'as in' to ensure grammatical accuracy. The corrected sentence would read: ‘The results showed that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the HO group was the same as in the NO group (p > 0.05).

For clarity and better flow in the conclusion, I recommend revising the sentence as follows:'The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state, but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side decreased during orthodontic tooth movement.

Introduction
For clarity and readability, I suggest revising the second paragraph of the introduction as follows:
'Clinicians often encounter cases that require the movement of teeth that have never experienced occlusal pressure or are considered hypofunctional. These cases include conditions such as open bites, ectopic canines, and lingually or bucally displaced teeth.'

I suggest rephrasing the paragraph in the introduction regarding the hypothesis as follows:'Based on research on hypofunctional teeth, the following hypotheses were formulated: (1) the number of osteoblasts on the tension side of hypofunctional teeth is higher than in normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement; (2) there is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth at both 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement; and (3) the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth is lower than in normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. Research on the number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement has not been conducted previously. This study aimed to investigate the number of osteoblasts on the tension side and osteoclasts on the pressure side of hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

I suggest revising the paragraph for clarity and flow as follows:'Wistar rats are considered an ideal research model for studies on orthodontic tooth movement due to their cost-effectiveness, which allows for the use of large sample sizes. Additionally, the histological profiles of rats, particularly in their incisor teeth, are easy to compare. The gingival structure of Wistar rat incisors closely resembles that of humans, and orthodontic appliances can be easily installed in these teeth

Materials and Methods section

I suggest revising the paragraph for clarity and flow as follows:
'This study used 18 healthy, male, five-month-old Wistar rats, each weighing approximately 400 grams, that had never been involved in any prior procedures. Male Wistar rats were chosen to eliminate the potential influence of hormonal variations during orthodontic tooth movement [8]. The rats were allowed to adapt to their environment for seven days on a standard diet, including pellets. They were housed in cages at room temperature (26°C).

There are several grammatical issues in the manuscript that may affect the clarity of your work. Work on steps that will help enhance the readability and overall quality of your work.

Other points that need clarification:
The study uses H&E staining for counting osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which is useful for general cell identification. However, for future work, I recommend considering the use of more specific methods, such as qPCR or immunohistochemistry (IHC), to assess osteoblast markers like Runx2, ALP, Osteocalcin, and BMP-2, as well as osteoclast markers like Cathepsin K, TRAP, and RANKL. These techniques could provide more detailed insights into the functional status and activity of these cells during orthodontic tooth movement.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Orthodontics, Biochemiistry and molecular dentistry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 16 Jun 2022

Erliera Sufarnap, Department of Orthodontics, Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Medan, Indonesia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134578.r140697

Dear Authors
I congratulate all the authors for the complete explanation of the ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 06 Jul 2021

Views

Reviewer Report 28 Jan 2022

Masaru Yamaguchi, Ginza Orthodontic Clinic, Tokyo, Japan

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57143.r119271

This paper describes that the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats.
Generally, this manuscript is interesting. However, there are some concerns as presented and some of these are discussed below.
... Continue reading

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Dental, Orthodontics, bone metabolism, inflammation

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

29 Apr 2022

Author Response

Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was ... Continue reading Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
Thank you very much for your insight. The force in this study was moderate force and already used in previous study about the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rat incisor.

How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We already revised in new version by adding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of this study.

I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
Hypofunctional research is usually done on molar because the hypofunctional state is easier to obtain by removing the upper molar teeth of rats. However, in this study, we chose incisors in order to facilitate the installation of orthodontic appliances and the anatomical structure of the periodontal tissue of the rat incisor was almost similar to humans. The hypofunctional state in this study was obtained by cutting the lower incisors of rats every two days.

The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
The number of osteoblast on the tension side in hypofunction group was actually increase, but not significant. Because it was not significant, we conclude that the number of osteoblast on tension side was not effected.

I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would continue the study to know deeper using immunostaining.
Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
Thank you very much for your insight. The force in this study was moderate force and already used in previous study about the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rat incisor.

How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We already revised in new version by adding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of this study.

I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
Hypofunctional research is usually done on molar because the hypofunctional state is easier to obtain by removing the upper molar teeth of rats. However, in this study, we chose incisors in order to facilitate the installation of orthodontic appliances and the anatomical structure of the periodontal tissue of the rat incisor was almost similar to humans. The hypofunctional state in this study was obtained by cutting the lower incisors of rats every two days.

The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
The number of osteoblast on the tension side in hypofunction group was actually increase, but not significant. Because it was not significant, we conclude that the number of osteoblast on tension side was not effected.

I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would continue the study to know deeper using immunostaining.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

29 Apr 2022

Author Response

Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was ... Continue reading Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
Thank you very much for your insight. The force in this study was moderate force and already used in previous study about the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rat incisor.

How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We already revised in new version by adding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of this study.

I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
Hypofunctional research is usually done on molar because the hypofunctional state is easier to obtain by removing the upper molar teeth of rats. However, in this study, we chose incisors in order to facilitate the installation of orthodontic appliances and the anatomical structure of the periodontal tissue of the rat incisor was almost similar to humans. The hypofunctional state in this study was obtained by cutting the lower incisors of rats every two days.

The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
The number of osteoblast on the tension side in hypofunction group was actually increase, but not significant. Because it was not significant, we conclude that the number of osteoblast on tension side was not effected.

I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would continue the study to know deeper using immunostaining.
Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
Thank you very much for your insight. The force in this study was moderate force and already used in previous study about the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rat incisor.

How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We already revised in new version by adding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of this study.

I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
Hypofunctional research is usually done on molar because the hypofunctional state is easier to obtain by removing the upper molar teeth of rats. However, in this study, we chose incisors in order to facilitate the installation of orthodontic appliances and the anatomical structure of the periodontal tissue of the rat incisor was almost similar to humans. The hypofunctional state in this study was obtained by cutting the lower incisors of rats every two days.

The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
The number of osteoblast on the tension side in hypofunction group was actually increase, but not significant. Because it was not significant, we conclude that the number of osteoblast on tension side was not effected.

I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would continue the study to know deeper using immunostaining.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 15 Jul 2021

Erliera Sufarnap, Department of Orthodontics, Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Medan, Indonesia

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.57143.r89164

Please allow me to congratulate the authors to perform this research study which I found quite interesting and useful as a reference for further study in the orthodontics field. We have been reviewing the manuscript.

However, I may require some clarifications on the following issues. My reviews recommend reconsideration to have some minor revisions which I will addressing the inquiries below.

General comment:

The paper is well organized and easy to follow. It also well-written and well-structured but unfortunately there were had some typos, inconsistent of using words or abbreviation, had an ambiguous comprehension in reporting the analysis results, and many statement didn’t follow with references. I suggest the revision of the English grammar structures by an expert and also to the statistician to interpret the result.

A. Abstract:

- Background:

“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.

- Results:

Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.

B. Introduction:

At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Describe the reference of why the animal model being used

C. M&M:

1. Animals:

Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.

2. Procedures:

Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics

3. Statistical analysis:

Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.

D. Results:

The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.

E. Discussion:

At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.

F. Conclusion:

Please conclude the study based on the results.
Please be consistent in using the groups name.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: cellulars in the orthodontic tooth movement research

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

29 Apr 2022

Author Response
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

... Continue reading
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Background:
“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.
Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. The study about periodontal structure of hypofunctional teeth that moved orthodontically is never been done before.

Results:
Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
p-value of osteoblast between NO and HO group is 0.187
p-value of osteoclast between NO and HO group is 0.014

Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast is not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

B. Introduction:
At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Hypotheses of the study are:

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

There is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement.

The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

Describe the reference of why the animal model being used
This study used animal model because we would like to see histologically during orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth. The histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans (Ren et al., 2004). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

C. M&M:
1. Animals:
Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
The reason why we choose male Wistar rats is because we avoid hormonal influences in female Wistar rats during orthodontic tooth movement.

“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
Thank you very much for your insight.

The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.
Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. This method was done based on previous study by Silva and Merzel (2004).

2. Procedures:
Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Olympus CX-22 (Olympus, Germany).

Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics
Osteoblast characteristic was based on previous study by Alhasyimi et al., (2018) which mentioned that osteoblast is cuboid cell with single and deep-blue nucleus. Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae (Florencia-silva et al., 2015). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

3. Statistical analysis:
Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.
The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

D. Results:
The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast was not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

Osteoclast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.011. However, osteoclast significantly decreased at D5 to D10 with p-value 0.004. The number of osteoclast between D0 to D10 was not significantly different, with p-value 0.626.

Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

E. Discussion:
At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. The result between HO and NO group is not significantly different. Increasing number of osteoblast from D0 to D5 and then D10 on HO group has the same pattern with NO group, so the Post Hoc analysis is aimed to compare between time for both group together.

The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
Thank you for your kind assistance, I apologize for the typo. I have revised it in recent article.

The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation. For example, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGFs), required for growth of bone, muscle, and other cells (Stone et al., 2022).

TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor β) is growth factor that can affect bone metabolism. This mediator regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Fox and Lovibond, 2005).

Transforming Growth Factor has the role of stimulating differentiation osteoblasts and osteoclast apoptosis (Itohiya et al., 2016).

FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) is a representative growth factor which has shown the potential effects on the repair and regeneration of tissues (Moya et al, 2010).

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) also involved in stimulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Seifi et al., 2013).

IGF, induced by growth hormone and parathyroid hormone, is reproduced by osteoblast, chondrocytes and other bone cells, and plays an essential part as a local modulator in cell differentiation and proliferation in either an autocrine or paracrine manner. Igf-I stimulates not only osteoblast proliferation but also osteoclast formation (Tokimasa et al., 2003).

VEGF (Vascular Endhotelial Growth Factor) is an essential mediator during the process of angiogenesis, bone remodelling by stimulating osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclastic recruitment (Yang et al., 2012)..

Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the typos in new version of the article.

Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.
Thank you for your kind suggestions, this study’s limitations including days of observations which was limited for 10 days. Further study should provide longer time, at least 14 days up to 21 days, to observe further effect of hypofunctional condition in the number of osteoblast and osteoclast cell during orthodontic tooth movement.

F. Conclusion:
Please conclude the study based on the results.
The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was lower during orthodontic tooth movement under hypofunctional condition.

Please be consistent in using the groups name
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the groups name recent article.

References
Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M. Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442024/
Fox SW, Lovibond AC. Current insights into the role of transforming growth factor-beta in bone resorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;243(1-2):19–26.
Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016;3(1):1–8.
Moya ML, Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Francis-Sedlak ME, Kao SW, Opara EC, Brey EM
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr; 31(10):2816-26.
Seifi M, Badiee MR, Abdolazimi Z, Amdjadi P. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Cell J. 2013;15(3):230-237.
Tokimasa, C., Kawata, T., Kaku, M., Kohno, S., Tsutsui, K., Tenjou, K., Ohtani, J., Motokawa, M., Tanne, K., 2003, Effects of Insulin-like Growth FactorI on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice, Arch Oral Biol, 48:31-8
Yang YQ, Tan YY, Wong R, Wenden A, Zhang LK, Rabie AB. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification. Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):64-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.33. PMID: 22722639; PMCID: PMC3412670.
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Background:
“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.
Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. The study about periodontal structure of hypofunctional teeth that moved orthodontically is never been done before.

Results:
Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
p-value of osteoblast between NO and HO group is 0.187
p-value of osteoclast between NO and HO group is 0.014

Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast is not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

B. Introduction:
At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Hypotheses of the study are:

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

There is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement.

The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

Describe the reference of why the animal model being used
This study used animal model because we would like to see histologically during orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth. The histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans (Ren et al., 2004). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

C. M&M:
1. Animals:
Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
The reason why we choose male Wistar rats is because we avoid hormonal influences in female Wistar rats during orthodontic tooth movement.

“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
Thank you very much for your insight.

The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.
Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. This method was done based on previous study by Silva and Merzel (2004).

2. Procedures:
Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Olympus CX-22 (Olympus, Germany).

Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics
Osteoblast characteristic was based on previous study by Alhasyimi et al., (2018) which mentioned that osteoblast is cuboid cell with single and deep-blue nucleus. Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae (Florencia-silva et al., 2015). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

3. Statistical analysis:
Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.
The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

D. Results:
The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast was not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

Osteoclast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.011. However, osteoclast significantly decreased at D5 to D10 with p-value 0.004. The number of osteoclast between D0 to D10 was not significantly different, with p-value 0.626.

Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

E. Discussion:
At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. The result between HO and NO group is not significantly different. Increasing number of osteoblast from D0 to D5 and then D10 on HO group has the same pattern with NO group, so the Post Hoc analysis is aimed to compare between time for both group together.

The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
Thank you for your kind assistance, I apologize for the typo. I have revised it in recent article.

The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation. For example, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGFs), required for growth of bone, muscle, and other cells (Stone et al., 2022).

TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor β) is growth factor that can affect bone metabolism. This mediator regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Fox and Lovibond, 2005).

Transforming Growth Factor has the role of stimulating differentiation osteoblasts and osteoclast apoptosis (Itohiya et al., 2016).

FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) is a representative growth factor which has shown the potential effects on the repair and regeneration of tissues (Moya et al, 2010).

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) also involved in stimulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Seifi et al., 2013).

IGF, induced by growth hormone and parathyroid hormone, is reproduced by osteoblast, chondrocytes and other bone cells, and plays an essential part as a local modulator in cell differentiation and proliferation in either an autocrine or paracrine manner. Igf-I stimulates not only osteoblast proliferation but also osteoclast formation (Tokimasa et al., 2003).

VEGF (Vascular Endhotelial Growth Factor) is an essential mediator during the process of angiogenesis, bone remodelling by stimulating osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclastic recruitment (Yang et al., 2012)..

Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the typos in new version of the article.

Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.
Thank you for your kind suggestions, this study’s limitations including days of observations which was limited for 10 days. Further study should provide longer time, at least 14 days up to 21 days, to observe further effect of hypofunctional condition in the number of osteoblast and osteoclast cell during orthodontic tooth movement.

F. Conclusion:
Please conclude the study based on the results.
The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was lower during orthodontic tooth movement under hypofunctional condition.

Please be consistent in using the groups name
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the groups name recent article.

References
Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M. Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442024/
Fox SW, Lovibond AC. Current insights into the role of transforming growth factor-beta in bone resorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;243(1-2):19–26.
Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016;3(1):1–8.
Moya ML, Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Francis-Sedlak ME, Kao SW, Opara EC, Brey EM
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr; 31(10):2816-26.
Seifi M, Badiee MR, Abdolazimi Z, Amdjadi P. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Cell J. 2013;15(3):230-237.
Tokimasa, C., Kawata, T., Kaku, M., Kohno, S., Tsutsui, K., Tenjou, K., Ohtani, J., Motokawa, M., Tanne, K., 2003, Effects of Insulin-like Growth FactorI on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice, Arch Oral Biol, 48:31-8
Yang YQ, Tan YY, Wong R, Wenden A, Zhang LK, Rabie AB. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification. Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):64-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.33. PMID: 22722639; PMCID: PMC3412670.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

29 Apr 2022

Author Response
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

... Continue reading
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Background:
“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.
Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. The study about periodontal structure of hypofunctional teeth that moved orthodontically is never been done before.

Results:
Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
p-value of osteoblast between NO and HO group is 0.187
p-value of osteoclast between NO and HO group is 0.014

Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast is not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

B. Introduction:
At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Hypotheses of the study are:

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

There is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement.

The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

Describe the reference of why the animal model being used
This study used animal model because we would like to see histologically during orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth. The histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans (Ren et al., 2004). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

C. M&M:
1. Animals:
Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
The reason why we choose male Wistar rats is because we avoid hormonal influences in female Wistar rats during orthodontic tooth movement.

“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
Thank you very much for your insight.

The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.
Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. This method was done based on previous study by Silva and Merzel (2004).

2. Procedures:
Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Olympus CX-22 (Olympus, Germany).

Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics
Osteoblast characteristic was based on previous study by Alhasyimi et al., (2018) which mentioned that osteoblast is cuboid cell with single and deep-blue nucleus. Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae (Florencia-silva et al., 2015). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

3. Statistical analysis:
Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.
The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

D. Results:
The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast was not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

Osteoclast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.011. However, osteoclast significantly decreased at D5 to D10 with p-value 0.004. The number of osteoclast between D0 to D10 was not significantly different, with p-value 0.626.

Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

E. Discussion:
At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. The result between HO and NO group is not significantly different. Increasing number of osteoblast from D0 to D5 and then D10 on HO group has the same pattern with NO group, so the Post Hoc analysis is aimed to compare between time for both group together.

The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
Thank you for your kind assistance, I apologize for the typo. I have revised it in recent article.

The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation. For example, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGFs), required for growth of bone, muscle, and other cells (Stone et al., 2022).

TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor β) is growth factor that can affect bone metabolism. This mediator regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Fox and Lovibond, 2005).

Transforming Growth Factor has the role of stimulating differentiation osteoblasts and osteoclast apoptosis (Itohiya et al., 2016).

FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) is a representative growth factor which has shown the potential effects on the repair and regeneration of tissues (Moya et al, 2010).

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) also involved in stimulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Seifi et al., 2013).

IGF, induced by growth hormone and parathyroid hormone, is reproduced by osteoblast, chondrocytes and other bone cells, and plays an essential part as a local modulator in cell differentiation and proliferation in either an autocrine or paracrine manner. Igf-I stimulates not only osteoblast proliferation but also osteoclast formation (Tokimasa et al., 2003).

VEGF (Vascular Endhotelial Growth Factor) is an essential mediator during the process of angiogenesis, bone remodelling by stimulating osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclastic recruitment (Yang et al., 2012)..

Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the typos in new version of the article.

Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.
Thank you for your kind suggestions, this study’s limitations including days of observations which was limited for 10 days. Further study should provide longer time, at least 14 days up to 21 days, to observe further effect of hypofunctional condition in the number of osteoblast and osteoclast cell during orthodontic tooth movement.

F. Conclusion:
Please conclude the study based on the results.
The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was lower during orthodontic tooth movement under hypofunctional condition.

Please be consistent in using the groups name
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the groups name recent article.

References
Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M. Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442024/
Fox SW, Lovibond AC. Current insights into the role of transforming growth factor-beta in bone resorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;243(1-2):19–26.
Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016;3(1):1–8.
Moya ML, Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Francis-Sedlak ME, Kao SW, Opara EC, Brey EM
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr; 31(10):2816-26.
Seifi M, Badiee MR, Abdolazimi Z, Amdjadi P. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Cell J. 2013;15(3):230-237.
Tokimasa, C., Kawata, T., Kaku, M., Kohno, S., Tsutsui, K., Tenjou, K., Ohtani, J., Motokawa, M., Tanne, K., 2003, Effects of Insulin-like Growth FactorI on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice, Arch Oral Biol, 48:31-8
Yang YQ, Tan YY, Wong R, Wenden A, Zhang LK, Rabie AB. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification. Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):64-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.33. PMID: 22722639; PMCID: PMC3412670.
Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Background:
“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.
Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. The study about periodontal structure of hypofunctional teeth that moved orthodontically is never been done before.

Results:
Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
p-value of osteoblast between NO and HO group is 0.187
p-value of osteoclast between NO and HO group is 0.014

Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast is not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

B. Introduction:
At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Hypotheses of the study are:

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

There is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement.

The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

Describe the reference of why the animal model being used
This study used animal model because we would like to see histologically during orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth. The histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans (Ren et al., 2004). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

C. M&M:
1. Animals:
Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
The reason why we choose male Wistar rats is because we avoid hormonal influences in female Wistar rats during orthodontic tooth movement.

“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
Thank you very much for your insight.

The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.
Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. This method was done based on previous study by Silva and Merzel (2004).

2. Procedures:
Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Olympus CX-22 (Olympus, Germany).

Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics
Osteoblast characteristic was based on previous study by Alhasyimi et al., (2018) which mentioned that osteoblast is cuboid cell with single and deep-blue nucleus. Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae (Florencia-silva et al., 2015). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

3. Statistical analysis:
Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.
The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

D. Results:
The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast was not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

Osteoclast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.011. However, osteoclast significantly decreased at D5 to D10 with p-value 0.004. The number of osteoclast between D0 to D10 was not significantly different, with p-value 0.626.

Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

E. Discussion:
At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. The result between HO and NO group is not significantly different. Increasing number of osteoblast from D0 to D5 and then D10 on HO group has the same pattern with NO group, so the Post Hoc analysis is aimed to compare between time for both group together.

The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
Thank you for your kind assistance, I apologize for the typo. I have revised it in recent article.

The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation. For example, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGFs), required for growth of bone, muscle, and other cells (Stone et al., 2022).

TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor β) is growth factor that can affect bone metabolism. This mediator regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Fox and Lovibond, 2005).

Transforming Growth Factor has the role of stimulating differentiation osteoblasts and osteoclast apoptosis (Itohiya et al., 2016).

FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) is a representative growth factor which has shown the potential effects on the repair and regeneration of tissues (Moya et al, 2010).

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) also involved in stimulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Seifi et al., 2013).

IGF, induced by growth hormone and parathyroid hormone, is reproduced by osteoblast, chondrocytes and other bone cells, and plays an essential part as a local modulator in cell differentiation and proliferation in either an autocrine or paracrine manner. Igf-I stimulates not only osteoblast proliferation but also osteoclast formation (Tokimasa et al., 2003).

VEGF (Vascular Endhotelial Growth Factor) is an essential mediator during the process of angiogenesis, bone remodelling by stimulating osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclastic recruitment (Yang et al., 2012)..

Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the typos in new version of the article.

Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.
Thank you for your kind suggestions, this study’s limitations including days of observations which was limited for 10 days. Further study should provide longer time, at least 14 days up to 21 days, to observe further effect of hypofunctional condition in the number of osteoblast and osteoclast cell during orthodontic tooth movement.

F. Conclusion:
Please conclude the study based on the results.
The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was lower during orthodontic tooth movement under hypofunctional condition.

Please be consistent in using the groups name
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the groups name recent article.

References
Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M. Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442024/
Fox SW, Lovibond AC. Current insights into the role of transforming growth factor-beta in bone resorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;243(1-2):19–26.
Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016;3(1):1–8.
Moya ML, Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Francis-Sedlak ME, Kao SW, Opara EC, Brey EM
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr; 31(10):2816-26.
Seifi M, Badiee MR, Abdolazimi Z, Amdjadi P. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Cell J. 2013;15(3):230-237.
Tokimasa, C., Kawata, T., Kaku, M., Kohno, S., Tsutsui, K., Tenjou, K., Ohtani, J., Motokawa, M., Tanne, K., 2003, Effects of Insulin-like Growth FactorI on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice, Arch Oral Biol, 48:31-8
Yang YQ, Tan YY, Wong R, Wenden A, Zhang LK, Rabie AB. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification. Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):64-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.33. PMID: 22722639; PMCID: PMC3412670.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 06 Jul 2021

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3	4
Version 3 (revision) 13 Jun 22	read		read	read
Version 2 (revision) 29 Apr 22
Version 1 06 Jul 21	read	read

Erliera Sufarnap, Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Medan, Indonesia
Masaru Yamaguchi, Ginza Orthodontic Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
Janvier Habumugisha, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Narayan Gandedkar, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health (Ringgold ID: 522555), Sydney, Australia

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

4 Views

21 Nov 2024 | for Version 3

Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Discipline of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Narayan Gandedkar, School of Dentistry, Orthodontics, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health (Ringgold ID: 522555), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

This is a scientifically sound and good study and it has been reviewed twice, already. I have some points that will need further explanation.
Material and methodology

Why was the study limited for 10 days? The rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) would be affected if less days are selected instead of more. Although, osteoblast differentiation and proliferation might last up to 10 days (due to acute inflammatory response). It would be interesting in knowing whether the results of the current study remained the same beyond 10 days. This phenomenon should be explained in the context of days and OTM, and the hypofunctional condition.
17.5 cN used per incisor should be explained further regarding undermining resorption. The reference used in the study is for inflammatory response study. Generally, a very low force is used for OTM study.

Discuss the current limitations of the study.

Other biomarkers for OTM
compression–tension theory limitations in the light of other theories and current understanding of OTM
Immunostaining Vs H & E staining (current study) method.

Authors need to add and discuss the following articles:
Reference: 1, 2

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

References

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Orthodontics, tooth movement, root resorption, obstructive sleep apnea, accelerated tooth movement, jaw orthopedics

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

5 Views

19 Nov 2024 | for Version 3

Janvier Habumugisha, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan

5 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Orthodontics, Biochemiistry and molecular dentistry

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

7 Views

16 Jun 2022 | for Version 3

Erliera Sufarnap, Department of Orthodontics, Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Medan, Indonesia

7 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Dear Authors
I congratulate all the authors for the complete explanation of the manuscripts and additional citations. I decide no more revision for the manuscript. Thank you.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

cellulars in the orthodontic tooth movement research

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

26 Views

28 Jan 2022 | for Version 1

Masaru Yamaguchi, Ginza Orthodontic Clinic, Tokyo, Japan

26 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Dental, Orthodontics, bone metabolism, inflammation

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

Dear Dr. Masaru Yamaguchi
Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Was the force in this study optimal? The optimal force for molar tooth movement in rat may be 10g. The 25cN may induce an undermining bone resorption. In incisor, 17.5 cN force may be strong.
Thank you very much for your insight. The force in this study was moderate force and already used in previous study about the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in rat incisor.

How much was the amount of tooth movement? Please add the results of them.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We already revised in new version by adding the rate of orthodontic tooth movement of this study.

I think that research on Hypofunction is generally more suitable for molars, but how about it?
Hypofunctional research is usually done on molar because the hypofunctional state is easier to obtain by removing the upper molar teeth of rats. However, in this study, we chose incisors in order to facilitate the installation of orthodontic appliances and the anatomical structure of the periodontal tissue of the rat incisor was almost similar to humans. The hypofunctional state in this study was obtained by cutting the lower incisors of rats every two days.

The authors concluded that the number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional state but decreased the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement. However, this statement seems inconsistent. Did the number of osteoblasts on the tension side in hypofunction group also decreased?
The number of osteoblast on the tension side in hypofunction group was actually increase, but not significant. Because it was not significant, we conclude that the number of osteoblast on tension side was not effected.

I think that immunostaining such as TGF-b, VEGF, FGF, and IGF will be a better paper.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would continue the study to know deeper using immunostaining.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

38 Views

15 Jul 2021 | for Version 1

Erliera Sufarnap, Department of Orthodontics, Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi, Medan, Indonesia

38 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.

- Results:

Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.

B. Introduction:

At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Describe the reference of why the animal model being used

C. M&M:

1. Animals:

Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.

2. Procedures:

Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics

3. Statistical analysis:

Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.

D. Results:

The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.

E. Discussion:

At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.

F. Conclusion:

Please conclude the study based on the results.
Please be consistent in using the groups name.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

cellulars in the orthodontic tooth movement research

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

29 Apr 2022

Adibah Maulani, Orthodontic Postgraduate Education Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman, 55281, Indonesia

Dear Dr. Erliera Sufarnap

Thank you for your kind assistance in reviewing our manuscript and providing us with valuable advices. Please allow us to comment as follows :

Background:
“When moved orthodontically, hypofunctional teeth will have a decreased tooth movement rate compared to normal teeth” - This background already described the results indirectly which can correlated to lower osteoclast production and increased osteoblast. Please find another reason as a research gap which doesn’t comprehend to the OTM, maybe from the periodontal point of view.
Hypofunctional teeth would have less VEGF expression and decreased heparan sulfate proteoglycan production during orthodontic tooth movement. The study about periodontal structure of hypofunctional teeth that moved orthodontically is never been done before.

Results:
Please describe the exact numbers of the p-value of each osteoblast and osteoclast, and compare mean between groups as the result.
p-value of osteoblast between NO and HO group is 0.187
p-value of osteoclast between NO and HO group is 0.014

Osteoblast: The post hoc analysis which had been analysed to “compare” between each time points (internally) for both groups and please further describe with statistically words and maintain the chronological time points, i.e., significantly increased at D0-D5, D0-D10 and not significantly changed at D5-D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast is not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

B. Introduction:
At the last chapter, the research gap and the objective of the study clearly mentioned but We couldn’t see any hypothesis described in the introduction.
Hypotheses of the study are:

The number of osteoblasts on the tension side of the hypofunctional teeth is higher than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.
There is an increase in the number of osteoblasts and osteoclast of the hypofunctional teeth during 5 and 10 days of orthodontic tooth movement.
The number of osteoclasts on the pressure side of the alveolar bone in hypofunctional teeth lower than normal teeth during orthodontic tooth movement.

Describe the reference of why the animal model being used
This study used animal model because we would like to see histologically during orthodontic tooth movement in hypofunctional teeth. The histological profiles of rats are easy to compare, especially in incisor teeth. Incisor teeth of Wistar rats have a gingival structure that almost resembles humans (Ren et al., 2004). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

C. M&M:
1. Animals:
Please explain scientifically with refference the rationale to choose the male Wistar rats. The hypofunctional teeth could be happened to all genders.
The reason why we choose male Wistar rats is because we avoid hormonal influences in female Wistar rats during orthodontic tooth movement.

“…without a control group”; In my opinion, the NO already intervened as a control group.
Thank you very much for your insight.

The teeth were cut to the gingival margin level every 2 days. Explain about the teeth and pulp anatomical condition. Please also mention why the teeth were cut every 2 days.
Wistar rats is a rodent, so the incisor teeth will erupt continuously. To maintain the space between maxillary incisor teeth and mandible incisor teeth, the teeth were cut to the gingival margin every 2 days. The teeth and pulp was still in good condition even after being cut every 2 days. This method was done based on previous study by Silva and Merzel (2004).

2. Procedures:
Figure 1: We couldn’t see properly the palatal coil spring.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

Microscope (Olympus); please provide the type of the Olympus microscope.
Olympus CX-22 (Olympus, Germany).

Please provide the reference which were mentioned for the osteoblast and osteoclast characteristics
Osteoblast characteristic was based on previous study by Alhasyimi et al., (2018) which mentioned that osteoblast is cuboid cell with single and deep-blue nucleus. Osteoclast cells appear multinucleated with random boundaries, and purple in the resorption lacunae (Florencia-silva et al., 2015). Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

3. Statistical analysis:
Who were the two observers? Please mention in the manuscript.
The two observer were two-trained person who performed the measurement of osteoblast and osteoclast cell histologically. They were blinded to the applied sample. Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

D. Results:
The post hoc analysis were compared the differences between each time point for both HO and NO groups. Please describe those results based on the data, i.e, at D0 to D5, D0 to D10 and D5 to D10.
Osteoblast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.002, and so is at D0 to D10. However, at D5 to D10, the number of osteoblast was not significantly different, with p-value 0.99.

Osteoclast significantly increased at D0 to D5 with p-value 0.011. However, osteoclast significantly decreased at D5 to D10 with p-value 0.004. The number of osteoclast between D0 to D10 was not significantly different, with p-value 0.626.

Please consistent of using “the group’s name”; with or without abbreviation. As if it will choose without abbreviation please further consistent of using complete group’s name. For some journal, they would prefer mention with abbreviation though.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I have revised it in recent article.

E. Discussion:
At the first sentence for osteoblast discussion it discussed about time interval analysis, the author described only NO group unfortunately from Table 2 only had 1 result, did it mean that the statistic aimed to compare between time for both groups together? It supposed that the HO and NO increased together significantly at D0-D5 and D0-D10. Please, it would be more satisfy as if the author would ask the statistician whether the post hoc analysis results addressed for each group or for both group.
Thank you very much for your suggestion. The result between HO and NO group is not significantly different. Increasing number of osteoblast from D0 to D5 and then D10 on HO group has the same pattern with NO group, so the Post Hoc analysis is aimed to compare between time for both group together.

The first paragraph described all about osteoblast, but at the second last sentence it described about osteoclast. It has been incompatible discussion.
Thank you for your kind assistance, I apologize for the typo. I have revised it in recent article.

The second and third paragraphs describes slightly about Growth factors. Please describes first from the general (all GF) and then followed to each GF discussion.
Growth factors are proteins that attach to receptors on the cell surface, thereby activating a signal transduction, and subsequently affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Most growth factors have a specific effect on certain cell types on the process of proliferation and differentiation. For example, Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β, and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGFs), required for growth of bone, muscle, and other cells (Stone et al., 2022).

TGF-β (Transforming Growth Factor β) is growth factor that can affect bone metabolism. This mediator regulates bone remodeling by modulating osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Fox and Lovibond, 2005).

Transforming Growth Factor has the role of stimulating differentiation osteoblasts and osteoclast apoptosis (Itohiya et al., 2016).

FGF (Fibroblast Growth Factor) is a representative growth factor which has shown the potential effects on the repair and regeneration of tissues (Moya et al, 2010).

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) also involved in stimulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (Seifi et al., 2013).

IGF, induced by growth hormone and parathyroid hormone, is reproduced by osteoblast, chondrocytes and other bone cells, and plays an essential part as a local modulator in cell differentiation and proliferation in either an autocrine or paracrine manner. Igf-I stimulates not only osteoblast proliferation but also osteoclast formation (Tokimasa et al., 2003).

VEGF (Vascular Endhotelial Growth Factor) is an essential mediator during the process of angiogenesis, bone remodelling by stimulating osteoblast differentiation, and osteoclastic recruitment (Yang et al., 2012)..

Typos found in the TGF abbreviation supposed to be TGFb.
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the typos in new version of the article.

Some discussion for several paragraph didn’t have references.
Thank you for your kind assistances. We would complete the references in new version of the article.

We couldn’t find any study’s limitation. As if the study were flawless it would be accepted.
Thank you for your kind suggestions, this study’s limitations including days of observations which was limited for 10 days. Further study should provide longer time, at least 14 days up to 21 days, to observe further effect of hypofunctional condition in the number of osteoblast and osteoclast cell during orthodontic tooth movement.

F. Conclusion:
Please conclude the study based on the results.
The number of osteoblasts on the tension side was not affected by the hypofunctional condition but the number of osteoclasts on the pressure side was lower during orthodontic tooth movement under hypofunctional condition.

Please be consistent in using the groups name
Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have revised the groups name recent article.

References
Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M. Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442024/
Fox SW, Lovibond AC. Current insights into the role of transforming growth factor-beta in bone resorption. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;243(1-2):19–26.
Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016;3(1):1–8.
Moya ML, Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Francis-Sedlak ME, Kao SW, Opara EC, Brey EM
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr; 31(10):2816-26.
Seifi M, Badiee MR, Abdolazimi Z, Amdjadi P. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Cell J. 2013;15(3):230-237.
Tokimasa, C., Kawata, T., Kaku, M., Kohno, S., Tsutsui, K., Tenjou, K., Ohtani, J., Motokawa, M., Tanne, K., 2003, Effects of Insulin-like Growth FactorI on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice, Arch Oral Biol, 48:31-8
Yang YQ, Tan YY, Wong R, Wenden A, Zhang LK, Rabie AB. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ossification. Int J Oral Sci. 2012 Jun;4(2):64-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2012.33. PMID: 22722639; PMCID: PMC3412670.

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Khrisnan V, Davidovitch Z: Cellular, Molecular, and Tissue-level Reactions to Orthodontic Force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(4): 469.e1–469.e32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Maleeh I, Robinson J, Wadhwa S: Role of Alveolar Bone in Mediating Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Relapse. Biology of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Springer, Switzerland;2016; 1–12. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Esashika M, Kaneko S, Yanagishita M, et al.: Influence of Orthodontic Forces on the Distribution of Proteoglycans in Rat Hypofunctional Periodontal Ligament. J Med Dent Sci. 2003; 50(2): 183–194. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Tasanapanont J, Wattanachai T, Apisariyakul J, et al.: Biochemical and Clinical Assessments of Segmental Maxillary Posterior Tooth Intrusion. Int J Dent. 2017; 2017(2689642): 2689642. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Itohiya K, Kazaki H, Ishikawa M, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Mediates Alveolar Bone Apposition via Relative Augmentation of TGF-β Signaling by Decreased Asporin Production in Rats. Dental Oral Craniofacial Res. 2016; 3(1): 1–8. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Usumi-Fujita R, Hosomichi J, Ono N, et al.: Occlusal Hypofunction Causes Periodontal Atrophy and VEGF/VEGFR Inhibition in Tooth Movement. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(1): 48–56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[7] 7. Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM: The Rat as A Model for Orthodontic Tooth Movement--A Critical Review and A Proposed Solution. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(5): 483–490. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Beery AK: Inclusion of females does not increase variability in rodent research studies. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018; 23: 143–149. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Farmasyanti CA, Kujipers-Jagtman AM, Susilowati H, et al.: Effects of Pentagamavunon-0 (PGV-0) as Alternative Analgesics on Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Rats. Padjajaran J Dentistry. 2019; 31(3): 152–160. Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Alhasyimi AA, Pudyani PP, Asmara W, et al.: Enhancement of post-orthodontic tooth stability by carbonated hydroxyapatite-incorporated advanced platelet-rich fibrin in rabbits. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2018; 21(2): 112–118. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, et al.: Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 421746. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[12] 12. Herniyati H: The increased number of osteoblasts and capillaries in orthodontic tooth movement post-administration of Robusta coffee extract. Dental J (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi). 2017; 50(2): 91–96. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Arias OR, Marquez-Orozco MC: Aspirin, Acetaminophen, and Ibuprofen:Their Effects on Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(3): 364–370. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. d’Apuzzo F, Cappabianca S, Ciavarella D, et al.: Biomarkers of Periodontal Tissue Remodeling during Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice and Men: Overview and Clinical Relevance. Sci World J. 2013; 2013: 105873. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Indriasari V, Suparwitri S, Christnawati C, et al.: Different Effects of Soybean Isoflavone Genistein on Transforming Growth Factor Levels during Orthodontic Tooth Movement among Young and Old Rabbits [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Res. 2019: 8: 2074. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[16] 16. Stone WL, Leavitt L, Varacallo M: Physiology, Growth Factor. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Reference Source

[17] 17. Termsuknirandorn S, Hosomichi J, Soma K: Occlusal Stimuli Influence on the Expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1 Receptor in the Rat Periodontal Ligament. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4): 610–616. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Boonpratham S, Kanno S, Soma K: Occlusal Stimuli Regulate interleukin-1 beta and FGF-2 Expression in Rat Periodontal Ligament. J Med Dent Sci. 2007; 54(1): 71–77. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Tokimasa C, Kawata T, Fujita T, et al.: Effects of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I on the Expression of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in the Nasopremaxillary Suture under Different Masticatory Loading Conditions in Growing Mice. Arch Oral Biol. 2003; 48(1): 31–38. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Miyoshi K, Igarashi K, Saeki S, et al.: Tooth Movement and Changes in Periodontal Tissue in Response to Orthodontic Force in Rats Vary Depending on the Time of Day the Force is Applied. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23(4): 329–338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Salomão MFL, Reis SR, Vale VLC, et al.: Immunolocalization of FGF-2 and VEGF in Rat Periodontal Ligament During Experimental Tooth Movement. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014; 19(3): 67–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[22] 22. Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH: Orthodontic Tooth Movement:The Biology and Clinical Implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018; 34(4): 207–214. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Kaku M, Kohno S, Kawata T, et al.: Effects of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Osteoclast Induction during Tooth Movement in Mice. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(10): 1880–1883. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Maulani A: The Number of Osteoclasts and Osteoblasts in Hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement. figshare, Thesis. 2021. Publisher Full Text

The number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in hypofunctional teeth during orthodontic tooth movement in rats

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 2

Introduction

Methods

Ethical considerations

Animals

Procedures

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Statisical analysis

Results

Table 1.

Table 2.

Figure 3. Osteoblast cells (arrow) of NO group (A) and osteoblast cells of HO group (B) in the tension side during orthodontic tooth movement.

Figure 4. Osteoclast cells (arrows) of NO group (C) and osteoclast cells of HOgroup (D) in pressure side during orthodontic tooth movement.

Table 3.

Table 4.

Table 5.

Discussion

Conclusion

Data availability

Underlying data

Reporting guidelines

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated