Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (<i>Achatina fulica</i>) in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia

Eder Cano-Pérez; Jaison Torres-Pacheco; Luis Barraza-Quiroz; Jorge Morelos-Muñoz; Doris Gómez-Camargo

doi:10.12688/f1000research.28002.1

Home Browse Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]

Eder Cano-Pérez¹, Jaison Torres-Pacheco¹, Luis Barraza-Quiroz², Jorge Morelos-Muñoz², Doris Gómez-Camargo ^1,3

Eder Cano-Pérez¹, Jaison Torres-Pacheco¹, [...] Luis Barraza-Quiroz², Jorge Morelos-Muñoz², Doris Gómez-Camargo ^1,3

PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2021

Author details Author details

¹ Grupo de Investigación UNIMOL, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Bolívar, 13001, Colombia
² Programa Ambiente y Salud, Departamento Administrativo Distrital de Salud (DADIS), Cartagena de Indias, Bolívar, 13001, Colombia
³ Doctorado en Medicina Tropical, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Bolívar, 13001, Colombia

Eder Cano-Pérez
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Jaison Torres-Pacheco
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Luis Barraza-Quiroz
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing

Jorge Morelos-Muñoz
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing

Doris Gómez-Camargo
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Pathogens gateway.

Abstract

Background: The giant African snail, Achatina fulica, is an invasive species recognized for being a serious agricultural pest and an intermediary vector for diverse parasites that cause diseases in humans. The knowledge of the state of African snail populations in urban areas is of great ecological and public health importance. Therefore, our objective was to characterize the status of giant African snail populations present in the city of Cartagena, Colombia, including the assessment of nematode parasites in the specimens.
Methods. Sites were visited following information from citizens affected by the presence of the African snail. The specimens were collected and transported to the laboratory; subsequently, they were weighed, measured, and classified by size. Dissections of lung tissue and soft organs were performed to search for and identify nematode parasites. Size measurement between the sampled sites was statistically compared and density and biomass indicators were established.
Results. In total, 204 snails were collected distributed among four sites within Cartagena city. Of these, 50% were juvenile specimens (10-40 mm). The size of the specimens showed significant differences between the sampling areas. The calculated density was between 0.0019-0.68 ind/m² and the biomass between 3.92-48.75 kg/ha. No presence of nematode parasites was observed in these specimens.
Conclusions. Densities and biomasses of A. fulica in Cartagena do not reach levels considered highly harmful. On the other hand, although no parasites were found in these snails, it is relevant to continue with studies on the human health risks that represent the presence of this invasive species in urban areas of Cartagena.

Keywords

Achatina fulica, biomass, population density, invasive species, plague, intermediary vector

Corresponding author: Doris Gómez-Camargo

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This study was funded by the District Administrative Department of Health (DADIS) in Cartagena de Indias (inter-administrative contract number 010 of June 21, 2019).

Copyright: © 2021 Cano-Pérez E et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Cano-Pérez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Barraza-Quiroz L et al. Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:77 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.1) First published: 05 Feb 2021, 10:77 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.1) Latest published: 22 Mar 2021, 10:77 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.2)

Introduction

One of the greatest threats to global biodiversity, livelihoods, human and animal health, agriculture, and the local economy are invasive alien species¹. The giant African snail, Achatina fulica, (Bowdich 1822) is a gastropod native to Africa and considered one of the 100 worst invasive alien species in the world^2,3. Currently, this species is widespread in tropical and subtropical areas on all continents due to the growth of international trade and increased transport that facilitate the introduction of this species, accidentally through agricultural or horticultural products or intentionally as a source of food or as a pet^2,4,5.

The giant African snail is recognized as an agricultural and garden pest⁵. Its great reproductive capacity allows it to reach high densities and biomass in short times^3,5, and its broad spectrum herbivorous diet allows it to consume more than 50 species of native and agricultural plants, all of which makes this species a serious pest with the ability to modify habitats and displace native species⁵. The giant African snail is an intermediate host for various parasites, among which the nematodes Angiostrongylus cantonensis and Angiostrongylus costaricensis stand out, which cause eosinophilic meningoencephalitis and abdominal angiostrongyliasis in humans, respectively^6,7. Recently, the presence of A. cantonensis in African snails in Colombian territory was confirmed, putting the population on alert due to the exposure of humans to the parasitic load of this snail, leading to the consideration of eosinophilic meningitis as a possible emerging disease in Colombia⁸. Risk factors for infection in humans and pets by this and other nematodes include eating infected snails raw or undercooked, or food contaminated by snail slime or feces^9,10.

In Colombia, the presence of A. fulica was registered for the first time in 2010, since then the mollusk has been distributed in more than 20 departments, registering in all regions of the country¹¹. Particularly in the Colombian Caribbean Region, the growth of A. fulica populations has been documented in the department of Sucre^11–13. In Cartagena, Bolívar, journalistic media reported the presence of the giant African snail south of the city in 2016. However, since its appearance, there has been no scientifically documented record of the presence and distribution of this species in urban areas of the city, as well as its impact on human health. Therefore, the objective of this study was to generate the baseline of reference information on the African snail populations present in the Cartagena city, including the assessment of nematode parasites in the specimens.

Methods

Study area

Cartagena (10 ° 23'59 '' N 75 ° 30'52 '' W), capital of the department of Bolívar located within the Colombian Caribbean region, is a city of low ecotope or coastal, presenting altitudes between 1 and 9 meters above sea level, a temperature average of 27.5°C, a relative humidity of 80% and an annual rainfall of 870 mm.

Collection of specimens

The search for, and collection of, the snails was carried out between July and October 2019, a period that included the rainy season in the region and which the proliferation of the giant African snail is favored. The sampling consisted of visiting the sites within the city of Cartagena previously informed by citizens affected by the presence of the snail in their homes and surroundings. During the inspections, searches were carried out in gardens, under undergrowth and rubble, or between crevices where they could take refuge. The specimens were collected manually using gloves and face masks and transported in easy-sealing bags to the laboratory of the UNIMOL research group in the University of Cartagena. As this was a monitoring study, all the snails available in the study period were included for analyzes, no exclusion criteria were applied for the collection of the snails.

Morphometric analysis

The collection included live individuals of all sizes, which were measured using a digital caliper (0.01 mm) and weighed in a weighing machine (1 gr). The length of the shell was used as a descriptor of the total size of each individual, so size classes were defined as the following: class 1, to which newly hatched individuals and up to 10 mm were assigned; class 2, juveniles (10–40 mm); class 3, young adults (40–70 mm) and class 4, adults (> 70 mm)¹⁴.

Parasitological analysis

Specimens larger than 50 mm have a greater probability of carrying nematode larvae¹⁵, even so, we decided to evaluate specimens greater than 30 mm to increase the probability of findings. The snails were washed externally and were put to sleep by thermal shock by introducing them in ice water, once they were numb, the shell was broken by using dissection scissors to extract the lung tissue and the rest of the soft organs. The search and collection methods for nematode parasites described by Córdoba et al.¹⁶ were used. Briefly, the lung tissue was cut in 1 × 1 cm pieces and placed on microscope slides for observation under a stereoscope. Likewise, the other organs were cut and examined by compression between two glass pieces.

Data analysis

As data were not normally distributed, the snail size measurements between the sites were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests post hoc, using the statistical software SPSS v.19.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) with a statistic significance defined as p<0.05. Also, the population density of each zone was calculated according to the number of individuals collected per effective area sampled (Individuals/m²) and the biomass per unit area (kg/hectares) was established.

Ethical aspects

Giant African snail has been declared in Colombia as an invasive species, for which legal research permits are not required. This study was adjusted to the management regulations for A. fulica issued by the Ministry of Environment, 2011¹⁷. Also, during the execution of the study, efforts were made to reduce animal suffering during sacrifices, for this, the snails were put to sleep in ice water until their death before the dissections.

Results

During the period studied 204 snails were collected, distributed in four sites in Cartagena for which the presence of A. fulica was indicated by the community (Figure 1). The inspected sites where the snails were collected corresponded essentially to the gardens of private properties and residential condominiums (Manga, Las Gavias, and Serena del Mar). At these sites the snails were found in different substrates, such as plants, tree roots, grasses, under litter, flowerpots and ornamental plants; In Zaragocilla, aggregates were found in the rubble.

Figure 1. Sites where snails were found in Cartagena, Colombia.

Overall, 50% of the total material collected corresponded to class 2 snails, followed by class 3 (42.64%) and class 4 (7.35%). In particular, in the Zaragocilla and Las Gavias sites, class 3 individuals predominated with 44.11% and 52.33%, respectively, in Manga, class 2 specimens were more abundant with 73.33% (Table 1).

Table 1. Size class distribution of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Site	Class 2	Class 3	Class 4	Total
Zaragocilla	10	15	9	34
Manga	44	15	1	60
Las Gavias	48	56	3	107
Serena del Mar	0	1	2	3
Total	102	87	15	204

Class 1: newly hatched individuals (up to 10 mm); class 2: juveniles (10 to 40 mm); class 3: young adults (40 to 70 mm); class 4: adults (> 70 mm).

Mean size and weight per site is shown in Table 2. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between the sizes of the most abundant African snail population groups (Zaragocilla, Manga, and Las Gavias sites) (p<0.01). Likewise, Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons indicated that differences existed between each site (p<0.01 between each pairing). The population density established in each point, as well as the estimated biomass according to the calculated total weight, is presented in Table 3.

Table 2. Analysis morphometric the population groups of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Parameters	Site	n	Mean	Range	SD
Size (mm)	Zaragocilla	34	57.2	24.3–87.9	17.99
	Manga	60	36.2	20.5–78	11.44
	Las Gavias	107	42.6	28.3–80	8.08
	Serena del Mar	3	69	59.4–77.6	9.15
Weight (g)	Zaragocilla	34	26.4	3–86	20.8
	Manga	60	7.1	1–25	5.56
	Las Gavias	107	9,7	3–38	5.36
	Serena del Mar	3	21	17–25	4

n: number of snails collected, SD: standard deviation.

Table 3. Density and biomass calculated in the population groups of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Site	n	Sampled area (m²)	Density (ind/m²)	Total weight (g)	Biomass (kg/ha)
Zaragocilla	34	747	0.0455	898	12.02
Manga	60	88	0.6818	429	48.75
Las Gavias	107	2443	0.0438	1048	4.28
Serena del Mar	3	1605	0.0019	63	3.92

n: number of snails collected.

Regarding the parasitological analyzes, all the observed lungs were found healthy (free of cysts), likewise, no free larvae were observed in the slime or the rest of the soft organs, showing that these specimens were not infected with nematode parasites according to the methodology used.

Discussion

Understanding the populations of giant African snail present in different areas of Colombia is of great ecological, agricultural, and public health importance. The current study constitutes the first scientifically documented record of the presence of the species A. fulica in urban areas of the city of Cartagena.

It is known that the African snail can reach sizes of up to 300 mm in the length of the shell¹⁸. In contrast, other studies establish that the size naturally reached by A. fulica is around 100 mm^19,20. Even so, the mean values reported are usually much smaller and vary between 30 and 60 mm^{12,13,21–24}. Comparatively, our results from Cartagena agree with these last values, obtaining average sizes between 36.2–69 mm. Patterns in snail size can reflect the age structure of the population in a given area. It has been proposed that the establishment of A. fulica in new areas takes place in three stages: exponential, known as a long phase with vigorous individuals; stable, with a prevalence of a variable shell size among young and adult, and the decline phase, where young individuals are prevalent²¹. This suggests that the populations obtained from A. fulica collected in Cartagena are in the stable phase, presenting a variety of young and adult individuals.

The population density of A. fulica reported in this study was between 0.0019–0.6818 ind/m², these density values are similar to those obtained by De la Ossa et al. in studies carried out with snails collected in urban areas of the city of Sincelejo and other municipalities of the department of Sucre, these authors reported densities in a range of 0.0031–0.205 ind/m²^12,13,23. Other similar values were reported in a study performed in Ilha Porchat, Brazil, obtaining a density of 0.07 ind/m²³. Investigations such as those carried out in Havana, Cuba, showed a considerably lower density of snails (0.00015 ind/m²)²⁵. In contrast, densities of 1.1–4.6 ind/m² have been reported in different departments of Colombia²⁶, 0.06–8 ind/m² in Northeast Brazil²⁷, and an average of 8.4 ind/m² in Puyo, Ecuador²¹. On the other hand, studies performed in Puerto Iguazú y Corrientes, Argentina, recorded a much higher average density, which reaches 107.6 ind/m² and 118.6 ind/m², respectively^14,28. It has been mentioned that the areas highly affected by the giant African snail present densities of 10 ind/m² or more^11,29; this similarly occurs with regards to biomass, where devastating values of up to 780 kg/ha are estimated for areas which are highly affected^11,30. If that is the case, the densities and biomasses obtained in the snail populations of Cartagena are not very harmful.

Nematodes such as A. cantonensis and A. costaricensis cause eosinophilic meningoencephalitis and abdominal angiostrongyliasis, respectively, in humans. The life cycle of these nematodes involves rodents as the definitive host and mollusks of various species, including A. fulica, as intermediate hosts⁷. The snails examined in this work did not show evidence of infection by nematode parasites, one of the reasons could be the environment in which these snails were found. It has been noted that the African snail prefers sites such as garbage dumps, landfills, and empty lots, places where there is a greater probability of contact with rats, necessary for the nematodes to complete their life cycle¹⁶. In our case, more than 80% of the analyzed snails were collected in gardens of remarkably well-kept properties given the exclusivity of the sites, and according to interviews with various neighbors, rodents do not frequent these spaces.

In conclusion, although the densities of A. fulica estimated do not reach values considered highly harmful, the presence of this invasive species in properties and residential areas of Cartagena is worrying. Most of the snails were found associated with gardens, which suggests that the introduction and dispersal of this species within the city are related to the transport of organic fertilizers or other garden products, which could convert this species into a serious pest. Similarly, although no parasites were found in these snails, it is necessary to continue carrying out studies on the effect of this species on human health, as well as training campaigns on the management and control of the giant African snail in the city.

Data availability

Figshare: Raw data file_African Snail Project.csv, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13288808³¹.

This project contains the following underlying data:

Raw data file_African Snail Project.csv (original raw data)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the citizens of Cartagena and the Environmental Public Establishment of Cartagena (EPA-Cartagena) for their timely reports that allowed the location of the sites affected by the African snail. We thank the medical student Mariangel Sandoval for her special assistance in the collection of the specimens. Finally, we thank the team of the UNIMOL research group and DADIS for their support.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, et al.: Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013; 28(1): 58–66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Rekha Sarma R, Munsi M, Ananthram AN: Effect of Climate Change on Invasion Risk of Giant African Snail (Achatina fulica Férussac, 1821: Achatinidae) in India. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11): e0143724. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
3. Miranda MS, Fontenelle JH, Pecora IL: Population structure of a native and an alien species of snail in an urban area of the Atlantic Rainforest. Journal of Natural History. 2015; 49(1–2): 19–35. Publisher Full Text
4. Silva ECd, Omena EP: Population dynamics and reproductive biology of Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in Salvador-Bahia. Biota Neotrop. 2014; 14(3): 1–11. Publisher Full Text
5. Raut SK, Baker GM: Achatina fulica Bowdich and other Achatinidae as pests in tropical agriculture. In: Barker GM, editor. Molluscs as Crop Pests. Wallingford: CAB International. 2002; 55–114. Publisher Full Text
6. Londoño JD, Zamora A, Osorio J: Angiostrongylus Cantonensis y el caracol africano gigante como causantes de meningitis eosinofilica. RFS Revista Facultad de Salud. 2013; 5(2): 61–9. Publisher Full Text
7. Maldonado A, Simoes R, Thiengo S: Angiostrongyliasis in the Americas. In: Lorenzo-Morales J, editor. Zoonosis. Brasil: IntechOpen; 2012. Publisher Full Text
8. Giraldo A, Garzón C, Castillo A, et al.: Confirmation of the presence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in lung tissue of the African giant snail (Lissachatina fulica) in Colombia. Infectio. 2019; 23(2): 129–32. Publisher Full Text
9. Alfaro-Alarcón A, Veneziano V, Galiero G, et al.: First report of a naturally patent infection of Angiostrongylus costaricensis in a dog. Vet Parasitol. 2015; 212(3–4): 431–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. d'Ovidio D, Nermut J, Adami C, et al.: Occurrence of Rhabditid Nematodes in the Pet Giant African Land Snails (Achatina fulica). Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6: 88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
11. De la Ossa-Lacayo A, De la Ossa V, Lasso C: Registro del caracol africano gigante Achatina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en Sincelejo, costa Caribe de Colombia. Biota Colomb. 2012; 13(2): 247–52. Reference Source
12. De la Ossa-Lacayo A, De la Ossa V: Caracol africano gigante Achatina fulica bowdich 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda-achatinidae) en zona urbana de Sincelejo y Sampués Sucre, Colombia. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim Recia. 2014; 6(2): 299–304. Publisher Full Text
13. De La Ossa-Lacayo A, Castro J, Monroy M: Ampliación de la presencia del caracol africano gigante Acathina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en la zona norte del departamento de Sucre, Colombia. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim Recia. 2017; 9(2): 317–22. Publisher Full Text
14. Gutierrez DE, Beltramino AA, Vogler RE, et al.: Expansión del rango de distribución de Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Gastropoda) en la Argentina y su concordancia con modelos predictivos. Amici Molluscarum. 2013; 21(1): 17–21. Reference Source
15. Franco-Acuña DO, Pinheiro J, Torres EJL, et al.: Nematode cysts and larvae found in Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009; 100(2): 106–10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Córdoba D, Patiño A, Giraldo A: Prevalence of Strongylida nematodes associated with African Snail, Achatina fulica, in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2017; 22(3): 6276–86. Publisher Full Text
17. Resolución Número 654 de Abril 7 2011: Por el cual se corrige la Resolución No. 0848 del 23 de mayo de 2008 y se adoptan las medidas que deben seguir las autoridades ambientales, para la prevención, control y manejo de la especie Caracol Gigante Africano (Achatina fulica). Diario Oficial: n 48.041; 2011. Reference Source
18. Vinci G, Unnithan VK, Sugunan VV: Farming of the Giant African Snail, Achatina fulica. India. Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Institute. 1998; 56: 1–24.
19. Albuquerque F, Peso-Aguiar M, Assunção-Albuquerque M, et al.: Do climate variables and human density affect Achatina fulica (Bowditch) (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) shell length, total weight and condition factor? Braz J Biol. 2009; 69(3): 879–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
20. Rauth S, Ghara T: Impact of individual’s size on density of the snail pest Achatina fulica Bowdich (Gastropoda: Achatinidae). Boll Malacol. 1989; 25(9–12): 301–6. Reference Source
21. Gołdyn B, Kaczmarek Ł, Roszkowska M, et al.: Urban Ecology of Invasive Giant African Snail Achatina fulica (Férussac) (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) on its First Recorded Sites in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Am Malacol Bull. 2017; 35(1): 59–64. Publisher Full Text
22. de Andrade-Porto SM, de Souza KCP, Cárdenas MQ, et al.: Occurrence of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Railliet, 1898) larvae (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) infecting Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Amazon region. Acta Amazon. 2012; 42(2): 245–50. Publisher Full Text
23. De La Ossa J, De La Ossa-Lacayo A, Castro J, et al.: Incremento poblacional de Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda - Achatinidae) en una zona urbana de Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia. Rev Asoc Col Cienc (Col). 2017; 1(29): 21–9. Reference Source
24. Patiño A, Murillo O, Giraldo A: Variación morfológica poblacional de una especie invasora: el caracol gigante africano, Achatina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Biota Colomb. 2018; 19(1): 112–22. Reference Source
25. Vázquez AA, Sánchez J: First record of the invasive land snail Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica (Bowdich, 1822) (Gastropoda: Achatinidae), vector of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae), in Havana, Cuba. Molluscan Research. 2015; 35(2): 139–42. Publisher Full Text
26. Avendaño JM, Linares EL: Morfometría del caracol gigante africano Achatina fulica (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) en Colombia. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED. 2015; 7(2): 287–93. Reference Source
27. Albuquerque F, Peso M, Assunção M: Distribution, feeding behavior and control strategies of the exotic land snail Achatina fulica (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) in the northeast of Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2008; 68(4): 837–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
28. Gutiérrez Gregoric D, Núñez V, Vogler R, et al.: Invasion of the Argentinean Paranense Rainforest by the Giant African Snail Achatina fulica. Am Malacol Bull. 2011; 29(1/2): 135–7. Publisher Full Text
29. Lake PS, O’Dowd DJ: Red crabs in rainforest, Christmas Island: biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic snail. Oikos. 1991; 62(1): 25–29. Publisher Full Text
30. Tiller S: Production et cycle reproducteur de l’escargot Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 en Nouvelle Caledonie (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Achatinidae). Haliotis. 1982; 12: 112.
31. Cano Pérez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Barraza-Quiroz L, et al.: Raw data file_ African Snail Project.csv. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13288808.v1

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 22 Mar 2021

Revised

Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2021

Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.

Author Response 22 Mar 2021

Eder Cano Pérez, Grupo de Investigación UNIMOL, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, 13001, Colombia

22 Mar 2021

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.

Author details Author details

Eder Cano-Pérez
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Jaison Torres-Pacheco
Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing

Luis Barraza-Quiroz
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing

Jorge Morelos-Muñoz
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing

Doris Gómez-Camargo
Roles: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This study was funded by the District Administrative Department of Health (DADIS) in Cartagena de Indias (inter-administrative contract number 010 of June 21, 2019).

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 22 Mar 2021, 10:77

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.2

version 1

Published: 05 Feb 2021, 10:77

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.1

© 2021 Cano-Pérez E et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Cano-Pérez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Barraza-Quiroz L et al. Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2021, 10:77 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28002.1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2021

Views

Reviewer Report 05 Mar 2021

Diego E. Gutiérrez Gregoric, División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.30971.r79127

The present study focuses on an invasive alien species with potential effects on human health and agriculture. The population and parasitological analysis in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia is highlighted, in such a way as to evaluate the role of these snails as potential transmitters of parasites. As the authors postulate, these studies must be constant, since in Colombia itself parasites have already been registered in this snail.
With regard to data collection, the estimate of density is not clear, nor is the number of samplings. Did they go to the same site more than once? Is a site the same as a house? These points should be better clarified in the methodology and in the results tables.

Minor Comments

Keywords: Achatina fulica must go in italic.
Introduction: The authors mention the first citation of Achatina fulica in Colombia for 2010, however in 2009 it had already been cited by Borrero et al. (2009, Tentacle N ° 17).
In Table 1 you must indicate if it is the total number of individuals collected.
For further parasitological studies on snails, the authors should use other techniques for the observation of larvae, in addition to those used here (see Valente et al 2017, Veterinary Parasitology).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Malacology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 18 Mar 2021

Eder Cano Pérez, Grupo de Investigación UNIMOL, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, 13001, Colombia

18 Mar 2021

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 18 Mar 2021

Eder Cano Pérez, Grupo de Investigación UNIMOL, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, 13001, Colombia

18 Mar 2021

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 22 Mar 2021

Revised

Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Feb 2021

Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.

Author Response 22 Mar 2021

Eder Cano Pérez, Grupo de Investigación UNIMOL, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, 13001, Colombia

22 Mar 2021

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Dear reviewer,

Thank you for the comments and suggestions to our manuscript.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 2 (revision) 22 Mar 21	read	read	read
Version 1 05 Feb 21	read

Diego E. Gutiérrez Gregoric, Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Jenny J Chaparro Gutiérrez, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia
Roshmi Rekha Sarma, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Comments on this article

All Comments(1)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

10 Views

14 Jul 2021 | for Version 2

Roshmi Rekha Sarma, Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

10 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

In the article “Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) in urban areas of Cartagena, Columbia, Eder Cano-Perez and co-authors attempt to identify Giant African snail (GAS) population in the city Cartagena, Columbia and investigate the presence of nematode parasites in the collected specimens. Giant African snails are a highly invasive species and if remained unchecked can affect agriculture, native biodiversity, human health, and the economy. The authors in this paper provide an initial status of this invasive species since its introducing in 2016, whether they are carriers of nematode parasites and if they pose any potential human health risk. This article addresses the need for early assessment and collecting distribution information of invasive species to prepare and make better management plans. Despite the small Spatio-temporal distribution of the study, it makes an important contribution to invasive species distribution and its potential environmental and health risks.

The authors have collected specimens and location information for 204 snails from four zones within the city of Cartagena. They recorded their body weight, shell size, snail density per area, presence-absence of parasites within organs of each specimen. The authors found that 50% of the snails were juveniles (10-40 mm) followed by adults (40-70 mm and >70 mm). They also found a significant differences in sizes across the different zones. Interestingly the specimens collected were healthy and free from any cysts or larvae. The authors have clearly cited the current literature surrounding the invasion of giant African snails, especially across South America. The study design, sample collection and analysis as well as limitations of the collection sites are also well explained and justified. However, the raw data presented seems to be incomplete as a result the use and interpretation of the statistical models and analysis do not ensure full reproducibility of the data.

Here are some queries suggestions:

The authors indicate the number of samples collected is 204 but the raw data file lists only 50 individuals. As a result, I was not able to analyze the data myself. Additionally, can they provide details of how the variables were analyzed in the model?
It would perhaps be helpful if the authors provided information (in form of the column data) of the calculated population density and biomass per unit area in the raw data file.
Can the authors clarify why they decided not to normalize the data? The weight data can be ln-transformed, and the shell length can normalize using sqrt function.
The column “number of snails collected per site” is missing or if it is in the data file, the column title is missing.
Can the authors please elaborate on the column shell length? What do the two values indicate and some rows do not have two values.
Graphical representation of the statistical analysis will help in understanding the paper more as it will indicate the significant differences between the population density across the different collection sites.
The authors mention the Giant African snail affect the citizens of Cartagena; it would be helpful if they can shed light on what those effects are? For example, they are in general a nuisance or their presence or the sight of the snails.
Under the section “Morphometric analysis” it can be useful if the authors provide information as standard errors as “+/-” for digital callipers and weighing machine.
I would like to see some more discussion about the different phases of the A.fulica establishment and its potential impact (if any) in the future in Cartagena.
I would like to see some more discussion on the population density of the snails in Cartegena and what it can possibly imply for the future.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Invasive species, Data analysis

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

17 Views

12 Jul 2021 | for Version 2

Jenny J Chaparro Gutiérrez, CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia

17 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

The study of the African giant snail, Lissachatina fulica's distribution and possible source of zoonotic agents is critical. This study describes the pest's distribution in Cartagena, and its findings are valuable as primary data in the area.

Several parts of the manuscript, however, need to be supplemented or clarified:

1.The snail's genus and species are Lissachatina fulica.

2. It is unclear how they determined the sample size or the number of calls they would answer to define sample size.

3. Although the dissection method was chosen to search for nematodes in snails, the limitations of this methodology in comparison to enzymatic digestion methods were not mentioned. It is critical to include this when discussing the effects of parasite absence.

4.The cited literature is incomplete; it does not include all reports of studies on the presence of the snail in Colombia, and studies with relevant findings of nematodes with or without pathogenic potential in animals are omitted e.g:

Guerrero et al. (2018)¹
Penagos-Tabares et al. (2019)²
Heredia et al. (2018)³
Lange et al. (2018)⁴

5.Interviews with neighbours are mentioned in the discussion, but this is not reflected in the materials and methods, nor in the information analysis. However, no mention is made of the community's reaction to the presence of the snail. There is mention of a potential impact on public health, but no mention of consumption habits or home gardens with the data of interviews. Please clarify.

6.The conclusion emphasizes the significance of continuing to conduct studies and management and control campaigns; I propose that it be stated whether they exist in Colombia or should be designed, and whether they should be articulated with the ICA or the National Ministry of Health.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

References

1. Guerrero R, Rincon-Orozco B, Delgado NU: Achatina fulica (Mollusca: Achatinidae) Naturally Infected with Caenorhabditis briggsae (Dougherty and Nigon, 1949) (Nematoda: Rhabditidae).J Parasitol. 104 (6): 679-684 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Penagos-Tabares F, Lange MK, Vélez J, Hirzmann J, et al.: The invasive giant African snail Lissachatina fulica as natural intermediate host of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Troglostrongylus brevior, and Crenosoma vulpis in Colombia.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 13 (4): e0007277 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Heredia NS, Ávila AS, Velásquez LE: In vitro culture of L3 larvae of nematodes obtained from the African giant snail Lissachatina fulica (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in Santa Fe de Antioquia.Biomedica. 2018; 38 (0): 24-29 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
4. Lange MK, Penagos-Tabares F, Vélez J, Gutiérrez J, et al.: Regional report on Angiostrongylus vasorum in Colombia: Genetic similarity to European lineage.Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 13: 21-23 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Veterinary Parasitology

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

20 Apr 2021 | for Version 2

Diego E. Gutiérrez Gregoric, División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Responses to comments have been satisfactory.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Malacology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

28 Views

05 Mar 2021 | for Version 1

Diego E. Gutiérrez Gregoric, División Zoología Invertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina

28 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Keywords: Achatina fulica must go in italic.
Introduction: The authors mention the first citation of Achatina fulica in Colombia for 2010, however in 2009 it had already been cited by Borrero et al. (2009, Tentacle N ° 17).
In Table 1 you must indicate if it is the total number of individuals collected.
For further parasitological studies on snails, the authors should use other techniques for the observation of larvae, in addition to those used here (see Valente et al 2017, Veterinary Parasitology).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Malacology

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, et al.: Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013; 28(1): 58–66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Rekha Sarma R, Munsi M, Ananthram AN: Effect of Climate Change on Invasion Risk of Giant African Snail (Achatina fulica Férussac, 1821: Achatinidae) in India. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11): e0143724. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[3] 3. Miranda MS, Fontenelle JH, Pecora IL: Population structure of a native and an alien species of snail in an urban area of the Atlantic Rainforest. Journal of Natural History. 2015; 49(1–2): 19–35. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Silva ECd, Omena EP: Population dynamics and reproductive biology of Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in Salvador-Bahia. Biota Neotrop. 2014; 14(3): 1–11. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Raut SK, Baker GM: Achatina fulica Bowdich and other Achatinidae as pests in tropical agriculture. In: Barker GM, editor. Molluscs as Crop Pests. Wallingford: CAB International. 2002; 55–114. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Londoño JD, Zamora A, Osorio J: Angiostrongylus Cantonensis y el caracol africano gigante como causantes de meningitis eosinofilica. RFS Revista Facultad de Salud. 2013; 5(2): 61–9. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Maldonado A, Simoes R, Thiengo S: Angiostrongyliasis in the Americas. In: Lorenzo-Morales J, editor. Zoonosis. Brasil: IntechOpen; 2012. Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Giraldo A, Garzón C, Castillo A, et al.: Confirmation of the presence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in lung tissue of the African giant snail (Lissachatina fulica) in Colombia. Infectio. 2019; 23(2): 129–32. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Alfaro-Alarcón A, Veneziano V, Galiero G, et al.: First report of a naturally patent infection of Angiostrongylus costaricensis in a dog. Vet Parasitol. 2015; 212(3–4): 431–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. d'Ovidio D, Nermut J, Adami C, et al.: Occurrence of Rhabditid Nematodes in the Pet Giant African Land Snails (Achatina fulica). Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6: 88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[11] 11. De la Ossa-Lacayo A, De la Ossa V, Lasso C: Registro del caracol africano gigante Achatina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en Sincelejo, costa Caribe de Colombia. Biota Colomb. 2012; 13(2): 247–52. Reference Source

[12] 12. De la Ossa-Lacayo A, De la Ossa V: Caracol africano gigante Achatina fulica bowdich 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda-achatinidae) en zona urbana de Sincelejo y Sampués Sucre, Colombia. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim Recia. 2014; 6(2): 299–304. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. De La Ossa-Lacayo A, Castro J, Monroy M: Ampliación de la presencia del caracol africano gigante Acathina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en la zona norte del departamento de Sucre, Colombia. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim Recia. 2017; 9(2): 317–22. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Gutierrez DE, Beltramino AA, Vogler RE, et al.: Expansión del rango de distribución de Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Gastropoda) en la Argentina y su concordancia con modelos predictivos. Amici Molluscarum. 2013; 21(1): 17–21. Reference Source

[15] 15. Franco-Acuña DO, Pinheiro J, Torres EJL, et al.: Nematode cysts and larvae found in Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009; 100(2): 106–10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Córdoba D, Patiño A, Giraldo A: Prevalence of Strongylida nematodes associated with African Snail, Achatina fulica, in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2017; 22(3): 6276–86. Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Resolución Número 654 de Abril 7 2011: Por el cual se corrige la Resolución No. 0848 del 23 de mayo de 2008 y se adoptan las medidas que deben seguir las autoridades ambientales, para la prevención, control y manejo de la especie Caracol Gigante Africano (Achatina fulica). Diario Oficial: n 48.041; 2011. Reference Source

[18] 18. Vinci G, Unnithan VK, Sugunan VV: Farming of the Giant African Snail, Achatina fulica. India. Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Institute. 1998; 56: 1–24.

[19] 19. Albuquerque F, Peso-Aguiar M, Assunção-Albuquerque M, et al.: Do climate variables and human density affect Achatina fulica (Bowditch) (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) shell length, total weight and condition factor? Braz J Biol. 2009; 69(3): 879–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Rauth S, Ghara T: Impact of individual’s size on density of the snail pest Achatina fulica Bowdich (Gastropoda: Achatinidae). Boll Malacol. 1989; 25(9–12): 301–6. Reference Source

[21] 21. Gołdyn B, Kaczmarek Ł, Roszkowska M, et al.: Urban Ecology of Invasive Giant African Snail Achatina fulica (Férussac) (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) on its First Recorded Sites in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Am Malacol Bull. 2017; 35(1): 59–64. Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. de Andrade-Porto SM, de Souza KCP, Cárdenas MQ, et al.: Occurrence of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Railliet, 1898) larvae (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) infecting Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Amazon region. Acta Amazon. 2012; 42(2): 245–50. Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. De La Ossa J, De La Ossa-Lacayo A, Castro J, et al.: Incremento poblacional de Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda - Achatinidae) en una zona urbana de Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia. Rev Asoc Col Cienc (Col). 2017; 1(29): 21–9. Reference Source

[24] 24. Patiño A, Murillo O, Giraldo A: Variación morfológica poblacional de una especie invasora: el caracol gigante africano, Achatina fulica (Bowdich 1822) (Mollusca: Gastropoda-Achatinidae) en el departamento del Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Biota Colomb. 2018; 19(1): 112–22. Reference Source

[25] 25. Vázquez AA, Sánchez J: First record of the invasive land snail Achatina (Lissachatina) fulica (Bowdich, 1822) (Gastropoda: Achatinidae), vector of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae), in Havana, Cuba. Molluscan Research. 2015; 35(2): 139–42. Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Avendaño JM, Linares EL: Morfometría del caracol gigante africano Achatina fulica (Gastropoda: Achatinidae) en Colombia. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED. 2015; 7(2): 287–93. Reference Source

[27] 27. Albuquerque F, Peso M, Assunção M: Distribution, feeding behavior and control strategies of the exotic land snail Achatina fulica (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) in the northeast of Brazil. Braz J Biol. 2008; 68(4): 837–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Gutiérrez Gregoric D, Núñez V, Vogler R, et al.: Invasion of the Argentinean Paranense Rainforest by the Giant African Snail Achatina fulica. Am Malacol Bull. 2011; 29(1/2): 135–7. Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Lake PS, O’Dowd DJ: Red crabs in rainforest, Christmas Island: biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic snail. Oikos. 1991; 62(1): 25–29. Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Tiller S: Production et cycle reproducteur de l’escargot Achatina fulica Bowdich, 1822 en Nouvelle Caledonie (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Achatinidae). Haliotis. 1982; 12: 112.

[31] 31. Cano Pérez E, Torres-Pacheco J, Barraza-Quiroz L, et al.: Raw data file_ African Snail Project.csv. figshare. Dataset. 2020. http://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13288808.v1

Population characterization and parasitological assessment of the giant African snail (Achatina fulica) in urban areas of Cartagena, Colombia

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study area

Collection of specimens

Morphometric analysis

Parasitological analysis

Data analysis

Ethical aspects

Results

Figure 1. Sites where snails were found in Cartagena, Colombia.

Table 1. Size class distribution of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Table 2. Analysis morphometric the population groups of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Table 3. Density and biomass calculated in the population groups of A. fulica in Cartagena, Colombia.

Discussion

Data availability

Acknowledgements

References

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated