ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study

[version 5; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Health Services gateway.

Abstract

Background: Early studies found that the mental health problems rate was relatively high in university students. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of mental problems and associated factors in university students.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study at Supara mental health service in the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between February 2020 to June 2021. The primary outcome was the prevalence of psychiatric diagnosis according to the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). The secondary assessments included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), 8 items from the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to assess suicidal risk (8Q), , and the Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI-15). The prevalence of mental health problems was presented by frequency and percentage. In addition, multivariable regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors of mental health problems.

Results: A total of 184 participants (62% female; mean age = 22.49 years (SD 3.93) were recruited. The depressive disorders, adjustment disorders, and anxiety disorders rates were 57.1%, 15.2% and 13.6%, respectively. Grade point averages (GPAs) below 3.0 (OR=3.09, 95%CI: 1.17-8.14) and a family history of mental disorder (OR=3.40, 95%CI: 1.10-10.48) were significant associated factors of moderate to severe mental health problems. Detecting and screening these factors may help the university to provide early detection and treatment for students.

Conclusions: Depressive disorders were the most common mental health disorders. Females, low GPAs and a family history of mental disorder were predictors of moderate to severe mental health problems.

Keywords

Mental health problems, University students, Mental health service, Thailand

Revised Amendments from Version 4

We added some names to the Acknowledgement section.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Pracheth Raghuveer
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul

Introduction

Mental health issues are one of the leading global problems among university students [Macaskill, 2013; Akhtar et al., 2020]. Early studies found that mental health problems, especially in medical and nursing students [MacLean et al., 2016, Tung et al., 2018], disturbed not only the quality of life but also affected academic performance [Bakker et al., 2020] and empathic feelings for patients [Lins et al., 2015]. In addition, examples of common mental health problems in university students are stress [Pacheco et al., 2017], burnout [Pacheco et al., 2008], sleep problems [Azad et al., 2015; Chinvararak et al., 2021], depression [Tung et al., 2018, Pacheco et al., 2017], anxiety [MacLean et al., 2016; Pacheco et al., 2017], and suicidal ideation [Pacheco et al., 2008]. Prior studies showed that the prevalence of depression in medical students globally and in Thailand ranged between 2-30% [Rotenstein et al., 2016; Phomprasith et al., 2022], while the anxiety rate was approximately 6-78% [Puthran et al., 2016]. Other psychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and substance use disorder, were also found [Pacheco et al., 2017]. However, most of the results came from a community-based study. There is still limited data on mental health problems in a clinical-based study in which clients decided to consult mental health services.

Furthermore, factors found to be associated with mental health problems in medical students include course year, academic pressure, relationship problems, bullying, sleep deficiency, high workload, and chronic medical diseases [Puthran et al., 2016; Firth, 1986]. However, there are several reports on the prevalence of mental issues; the results revealed that most medical students are more likely not to seek mental health help [Quince et al., 2012]. This cause may result from a negative attitude toward psychiatric disorders, fear of stigmatisation, or confidentiality concern about the treatment process [Jacob et al., 2020; Hankir et al., 2014].

“Supara” mental health clinic is a specialised in-house clinic that provides mental health service for students and staff of Navamindradhiraj University. This clinic was established and implemented in 2020 by the department of psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, which is affiliated with Navamindradhiraj University. The clinic intended to increase access to mental health services for university students by addressing confidentiality, privacy, and waiting time. There are psychologists, mental health nurses, and psychiatrists who provide comprehensive mental health evaluation and treatment (Figure 1).

9593546e-aa61-4a36-abaf-b1a57d80c5d7_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Supara mental health service process map.

Although much research has studied the prevalence and associated factors of mental health problems in students, Supara mental health clinic is a specific service model. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of common mental health problems among undergraduate and postgraduate students of Navamindradhiraj University who decide to seek the mental health service. The results of this study will be used to plan for further service improvements based on the prevalence of common problems and related factors.

Methods

Ethics and consent

We obtained approval from the Ethical Committee of the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital on June 26th, 2021 (COA no. 111/2564). All participants were asked to provide written informed consent to complete routine patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) when using the clinic’s service. Informed consent described the purpose of data collection, i.e. to assess treatment effectiveness in the routine clinic. They were also informed that their information might be used in the future under the supervision of the ethical committee. The data used in this study were retrospectively retrieved from the clinic’s records; participants were not directly involved.

Study design, setting, and participants

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on STROBE guidelines [von Elm et al., 2008]. We retrospectively investigated the mental health record form from Supara mental health service's database. The sample size was calculated according to the Cochrane formula [Wayne, 1995]. The number of students visiting (N) Supara mental health service between February 2020 to June 2021 was 260. The sample size was estimated by p = 0.196 according to the study by Limsricharoen et al. [2014]. Using alpha at 0.05 and error (d) at 0.05, the required sample size was 140.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Participants were included if they: (a) were a student of Navamindradhiraj university; (b) were aged 18 years and older; (c) had a record of using the mental health service. Participants were excluded if their record data was not sufficient to be analysed.

Data collection

Materials

Participants visiting Supara mental health service would perform the questionnaires in-person on the first visit. We explored the pre-existing database and created the data record form. The data record form comprised five sections: 1) demographic data including sex, age, admission route to the university, course year, faculty, department, underlying disease, waiting time before receiving the first evaluation, satisfactory scores which is a Likert-type scale from 0 to 10 (0 = poor, 10 = excellent); 2) clinical characteristics including diagnosis recorded according to the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) [World Health Organization, 1992], from a consultant psychiatrist, number of visits to the mental health service, a history of psychiatric treatment and, prescription of psychotropic medications; 3) Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI); 4) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); 5) 8 items from the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to assess suicidal risk (8Q); and 6) Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI-15).

CGI was used to assess the severity of the illness. It is divided into 7 levels of severity, sorted into ascending severity scores: 1) normal or not at all ill, 2) borderline mentally ill, 3) mildly ill, 4) moderately ill, 5) markedly ill, 6) severely ill, and 7) among the most extremely ill patients [Busner and Targum, 2007].

PHQ-9 Thai version consists of a total of 9 questions. The total score of PHQ-9 is categorised into 4 levels of severity of depression: 1) normal (0–6), 2) mild (7–12), 3) moderate (13–18), and 4) severe (≥19). The sensitivity and specificity of PHQ-9 to distinguish depression are 84% and 77%, respectively [Lotrakul et al., 2008].

8Q was developed to measure suicidal risk by Kittirattanapaiboon following the MINI. It is classified as suicidal risk into 1) low risk (1-8), 2) moderate risk (9-16), and 3) high risk (>17) [Kittirattanapaiboon and Khamwongpin, 2005].

TMHI-15 short version was developed by Monhkol et al. and aimed to measure the mental health of Thai people. The total scores can be divided into 3 groups: 1) better than average mental health (51-60), 2) average mental health (44-50), and 3) below average mental health (<43) [Mongkol et al., 2013].

All questionnaires except CGI in this study were self-rated by participants on their first visit to the Supara mental health service. The CGI scale was rated by psychiatrists on the patient’s first visit. PK and CC extracted the record data independently. If there were any conflicts in the data, the third author would double-check the result and provide the final consensus.

Statistical analyses

Data were analysed using SPSS software (version 28.0; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The prevalence of mental health problems was presented by frequency and percentage. In addition, associated factors to the severity of mental health problems were analysed by the Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the variable types. Finally, multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) was used to identify potential predictors of mental health problems. We classified the severity of mental health problems by CGI scale: normal to mild (CGI 1-3) and moderate to severe (CGI 4-7). We used the listwise deletion method for handling missing data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of 184 participants recruited in this study, they had a mean age of 22.49 years old (SD 3.92). Most participants were female (62%), undergraduate (84.8%), and studied in the Doctor of Medicine programme. Most medical students were enrolled at the university through the consortium of Thai Medical Schools admission system (71.4%), and they were preclinical year students (59%). Furthermore, the participants' average grade point average (GPAs) was 3.15 (SD 0.42). The median waiting time for their first psychiatric assessment was 0 days (IQR 0-5). Lastly, the majority of participants were satisfied with the university's mental health service, with a mean score of 9.45 (SD 0.83) ( Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic data (n=184).

Variablesn (%)
Sex
Male70(38.0)
Female114(62.0)
Age (years), Mean ± SD22.49 ± 3.92
Education level
Undergraduate156(84.8)
Resident or Fellowship26(14.1)
Unspecified2(1.1)
Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital
Doctor of medicine105(57.1)
Bachelor of Science Programme in Paramedic9(4.9)
Bachelor of Science Programme in Radiological Technology6(3.3)
Resident or Fellowship25(13.6)
Kuakarun Faculty of Nursing17(9.2)
Faculty of Sciences and Health Technology15(8.2)
Institute of Metropolitan Development2(1.1)
Urban Community Development3(1.6)
Unknown2(1.1)
Course year (Doctor of Medicine, n = 105)
Preclinical year62(59.0)
Clinical year37(35.2)
Unknown6(5.7)
Admission route (Doctor of Medicine, n = 105)
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) School's quota5(4.8)
Vajiravudh College's quota3(2.9)
First-degree relatives of BMA and university officer's quota6(5.7)
Local Government Organization School's quota1(1.0)
Others (i.e. special English talent)2(1.9)
The consortium of Thai Medical Schools75(71.4)
Unknown13(12.4)
GPA, Mean ± SD3.15 ± 0.42
<3.039(21.2)
≥3.099(53.8)
Unknown46(25.0)
Underlying medical disease37(20.1)
A family history of mental disorder26(14.1)
Waiting time (Median, IQR)0(0-5)
Wish to use the telemedicine service107(58.2)
Satisfactory scores, Mean ± SD (0 = poor, 10 = excellent)9.45 ± 0.83

Table 2 demonstrates the prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses. Among all psychiatric disorders, depressive disorders (57.1%), adjustment disorders (15.2%), and anxiety disorders (13.6%) were the top three most common diagnoses. The median number of visits to the mental health service was 7 (IRQ 3-14). Approximately 86% of participants received psychotropic medications.

Table 2. Prevalence of common mental disorders and clinical characteristics.

ICD-10 diagnosisn (%)
Depressive disorders105(57.1)
Adjustment disorders28(15.2)
Anxiety disorders25(13.6)
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD)16(8.7)
Insomnia disorder6(3.3)
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)5(2.7)
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)5(2.7)
Acute stress reaction4(2.2)
Bipolar disorder2(1.1)
Mental disorders due to known physiological conditions1(0.5)
Eating disorders1(0.5)
Somatoform disorder1(0.5)
Autistic disorder1(0.5)
Tic disorder1(0.5)
Clinical characteristics
 - Number of visits to the mental health service, Median (IQR)7(3-14)
 - Psychotropic medications158(85.9)
 - A history of psychiatric hospitalisation2(1.1)

Table 3 reveals the measurement tools used in the mental health service. Around 38% of participants had a CGI scale of 4 (moderately ill). Most participants had mild depression (50%) and low suicidal risk (76.3%) from PHQ-9 and 8Q, respectively. Unsurprisingly, all participants had below-average mental health from TMHI-15.

Table 3. PHQ-9, 8Q, TMH-15 and CGI scales.

Measurement scoresn (%)
CGI scale (n=167)
Normal, not at all ill9(4.9)
Borderline mentally ill8(4.3)
Mildly ill37(20.1)
Moderately ill70(38.0)
Markedly ill18(9.8)
Severely ill9(4.9)
Among the most extremely ill3(1.6)
Unknown30(16.3)
PHQ-9 (n = 160)
 - Mild (7–12)80(50.0)
 - Moderate (13–18)52(32.5)
 - Severe (≥19)28(17.5)
8Q (n = 160)
 - Low risk (0-8)122(76.3)
 - Moderate risk (9-16)17(10.6)
 - High risk (≥17)21(13.1)
TMHI-15 (n = 156)
Below average mental health (<43)156(100.0)
 - <1926(16.7)
 - 19-30103(66.0)
 - 31-4327(17.3)

The results of multivariable regression analysis showed that GPAs below 3.0 (OR = 3.09, 95%CI: 1.17-8.14) and a family history of mental disorders (OR = 3.40, 95%CI: 1.10-10.48) were the independent predictors of moderate to severe mental health problems ( Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. Factors associated with mental health problems (CGI).

FactorsSeverity of mental health problemsP-value
Normal to mild (n = 54) Moderate to severe (n = 100)
Gender
Male26(48.1)29(29.0)0.018
Female28(51.9)71(71.0)
Age (years), Mean ± SD21.41 ± 2.7521.88 ± 3.270.368
Educational level
Undergraduate47(87.0)89(89.0)0.718
Postgraduate7(13.0)11(11.0)
Programme
Doctor of Medicine33(61.1)57(57.0)0.858
Resident or Fellowship6(11.1)11(11.0)
Others15(27.8)32(32.0)
Course year (Doctor of Medicine n = 90)
Preclinical year20(60.6)40(70.2)0.353
Clinical year13(39.4)17(29.8)
Admission route (Doctor of Medicine n = 90)
The consortium of Thai Medical Schools23(69.7)47(82.5)0.397
Quota8(24.2)8(14.0)
Unknown2(6.1)2(3.5)
GPA, Mean ± SD3.28 ± 0.333.12 ± 0.450.370
<3.06(11.1)28(28.0)0.048
≥3.039(72.2)59(59.0)
Unspecified9(16.7)13(13.0)
Medical underlying disease9(16.7)25(25.0)0.517
Allergy6(11.1)15(15.0)0.502
Asthma2(3.7)2(2.0)0.612
Migraine1(1.9)2(2.0)1.000
Others1(1.9)6(6.0)0.422
A history of psychiatric treatment9(16.7)15(15.0)0.506
A family history of mental disorders4(7.4)22(22.0)0.030

Table 5. Factors associated with mental health problems (CGI) analysed by univariable and multivariable regression analysis (n=154).

FactorsUnivariable analysisMultivariable analysis
OR195%CIP-value ORadj295%CIP-value
Sex
Male1.00Reference 1.00Reference
Female2.27(1.14-4.52)0.0191.92(0.94-3.94)0.076
GPA
<3.03.09(1.17-8.14)0.0233.17(1.18-8.56)0.022
≥3.01.00Reference 1.00Reference
A family history of mental disorder3.40(1.10-10.48)0.0333.78(1.18-12.04)0.025

1 Crude Odds Ratio estimated by Binary Logistic regression.

2 Adjusted Odds Ratio estimated by Multiple Logistic regression.

Discussion

Mental health problems are a common issue in university students. The total number of Navamindradhiraj university students is approximately 2,500. In addition, around 260 students visited Suprara mental health clinic, so the point prevalence of mental health problems is around 10%. Moreover, this number is only for students who sought mental health treatment. Hence, the actual prevalence in a community-based setting is likely to be over 10%. The results revealed that medical students and residents of fellowship are the majority of participants in this study. We believe this is because students in the Faculty of Medicine, students are more familiar with the health service and have more exposure to the psychiatric unit due to their clinical coursework.

The most common psychiatric diagnoses in our study were depressive disorders, adjustment disorders and anxiety disorders, respectively. The prevalence of common mental disorders in this study was similar to the study by MacLean et al. [2016], Tung et al. [2018], and Pacheco et al. [2017]. Our study is among the first to present the prevalence of common mental health problems from a university mental health service. The prevalence of depression in the present study was higher than in prior studies [Akhtar et al., 2020; Pacheco et al., 2017; Rotenstein et al., 2016], likely because the participants were recruited from the mental health service. However, the anxiety rate was similar to earlier studies [Phomprasith et al., 2022]. Additionally, the three most common mental health problems presented in the service are similar to those in the community-based study of Thai university students [Chiddaycha and Wainipitapong, 2021]. It can also be implied that university mental health service may benefit more from improving the service for depression and anxiety; for example, through the use of standard psychotherapy (cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal therapy) [Hofmann et al., 2012].

The PHQ-9 and 8Q questionnaires showed most participants had mild depression and a low risk of suicide. However, the overall CGI scale at baseline is four (moderately ill), which is clinically significant and needs to be tackled to prevent further complications and disease progression. All participants had below-average mental health from TMHI-15. However, TMHI-15 could be useful for monitoring treatment improvement in mental health status.

Interestingly, most clients rated our mental health service a very high satisfaction score. In addition, it can be seen that the median waiting time for the first psychiatric evaluation was zero days as the university policy intends to provide a standard of mental health care urgently and vitally for the students. Furthermore, more than half of our participants would like to use telemedicine. This is probably influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it can indicate that the clinic should implement telemedicine in the service. We will apply a full service of telemedicine to our clinic in the near future in order to increase accessibility to the service as well as avoid mental health stigma for our students. However, for high-risk cases, mental health teams should advise and convince them to come to evaluate further face-to-face.

The multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that having a low GPAs and a family history of mental disorders were strong predictors of moderate to severe mental health problems. Therefore, these factors may be helpful in screening mental health problems for university students.

There are several strengths in this study. First, the study was established in the specialised mental health service for university students, which is rare in Thailand. Secondly, we had planned to collect the data in all cases in our service, Finally, two authors extracted the diagnosis data following ICD-10 [World Health Organization, 1992] separately in order to avoid missing data and bias.

We are aware of some limitations of this study. First, due to the cross-sectional descriptive design, we can only indicate associated factors, not causal relationships. Secondly, the results of the present came from Navamindradhiraj University, so it may have a different context from other universities, which may not be representative of all university students. Finally, most of the mental health screening questionnaires were self-rated scales; therefore, the assessment must be interpreted cautiously.

Future research should investigate the longitudinal data that can assess the effectiveness of our mental health service. Moreover, a study about mental health problems in university staff should be done because Supara mental health service also provides mental health consults to all university staff.

Conclusions

The most common mental health problems in university students were depressive disorders. Low GPAs and a family history of mental disorder were independent predictors of moderate to severe mental health problems. Screening these factors may be helpful for the university to provide early detection and management.

Data availability

Underlying data

figshare: Data-Supara Mental Health Service. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21131953.v2 [Chinvararak, 2022]

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • - Raw data-Pre-analysed.xlsx (Anonymised responses in excel sheet)

Extended data

figshare: Data-Supara Mental Health Service. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21131953.v2 [Chinvararak, 2022]

This project contains the following extended data:

  • - Data Record Form_Supara.docx (Blank English copy of the data record form used in this study)

  • - Figure 1.jpg

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Lisence (CC BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 5
VERSION 5 PUBLISHED 27 Sep 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (5)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Kirdchok P, Kolkijkovin V, Munsukpol W and Chinvararak C. Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126054.5)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 5
VERSION 5
PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2025
Revised
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Apr 2025
Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Center of Excellence in Transgender Health (CETH), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;  Division of Academics Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand 
Approved
VIEWS 2
I approved the minor change made ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bumphenkiatikul T. Reviewer Report For: Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179772.r375432)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 31 Mar 2023
Revised
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 21 Apr 2023
Pracheth Raghuveer, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 
Approved
VIEWS 7
I am satisfied with the changes made by the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Raghuveer P. Reviewer Report For: Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.146131.r168362)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
6
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Apr 2023
Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Center of Excellence in Transgender Health (CETH), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;  Division of Academics Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand 
Approved
VIEWS 6
After revision by the authors, the manuscript now includes an elaboration that satisfactory scores are assessed using a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = poor, 10 = excellent), which is a feasible measure for evaluating short-term outcomes ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bumphenkiatikul T. Reviewer Report For: Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.146131.r168361)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 27 Sep 2022
Views
25
Cite
Reviewer Report 20 Mar 2023
Pracheth Raghuveer, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India, Bangalore, Karnataka, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 25
The study highlights the prevalence and determinants of mental health problems among university students in a specialized mental health clinic. It is a well-written paper. There is further scope for improvement. Here are my constructive comments:
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Raghuveer P. Reviewer Report For: Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.138429.r162187)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2023
    Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand
    03 Apr 2023
    Author Response
    Thank you very much for your time and valuable comment in order to improve our manuscript. We really appreciate it. We have addressed all of your comments in the 2nd version ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2023
    Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand
    03 Apr 2023
    Author Response
    Thank you very much for your time and valuable comment in order to improve our manuscript. We really appreciate it. We have addressed all of your comments in the 2nd version ... Continue reading
Views
30
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Nov 2022
Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Center of Excellence in Transgender Health (CETH), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand;  Division of Academics Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand 
Approved
VIEWS 30
The article describes common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting one in-house mental health clinic that provides services for students and staff of one university in Thailand. The results show depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, and anxiety ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Bumphenkiatikul T. Reviewer Report For: Prevalence of common mental health problems and associated factors among university students visiting Supara mental health service: A cross-sectional study [version 5; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:1107 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.138429.r152313)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 17 Nov 2022
    Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand
    17 Nov 2022
    Author Response
    Thank you very much for your review and suggestions for our manuscript.

    In the follow-up study, which will have more participants, we plan to investigate the subgroup and make ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 17 Nov 2022
    Chotiman Chinvararak, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand
    17 Nov 2022
    Author Response
    Thank you very much for your review and suggestions for our manuscript.

    In the follow-up study, which will have more participants, we plan to investigate the subgroup and make ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 5
VERSION 5 PUBLISHED 27 Sep 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.