Keywords
Ewing’s sarcoma, Scapula, Tumors
This article is included in the Oncology gateway.
Ewing’s sarcoma, Scapula, Tumors
Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive primary osseous neoplasm and those arising from the scapula comprise fewer than 4% of all ES.1 ES of the scapula are often asymptomatic and grow quite large before being diagnosed due to their deep location, thus these tumors are discovered late and usually at the metastatic stage of the disease.2,3 This neoplasm is the second most common malignant bone tumor of children and young adults, but it’s incidence declines rapidly as age increases beyond 20 years and is extremely rare in adults over 40 years of age.4 Our literature review showed only two reported cases of Ewing’s sarcoma of the scapula in adults over 40 years old which were discovered at the metastatic stage3,14 (cases with insufficient data information were excluded). Here, we present the first case reported to our knowledge of a localized ES of the scapula in an adult over 40 years of age.
This case report has been reported in line with the SCARE Criteria.5
A 48-year-old male Caucasian police officer presented with a painful swelling of the left shoulder evolving for one year. The patient had no medical or surgical history nor allergies. There was no history of systemic symptoms such as fever, anorexia, or recent subjective weight loss. The increase in size of the swollen shoulder brought him to seek medical attention without taking any medication so far. Physical examination showed a hard, painful, and ill-defined bony mass of the left scapular region measuring 5 × 3 cm without adjacent cutaneous lesions.26 The mobility of the upper limb was preserved. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations were unremarkable. An X-ray of the left shoulder showed a bony mass with osteolytic lesions suggestive of a primary bone tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed showing a necrotic mass invading the scapula and the soft tissues of the left shoulder suggesting a sarcoma (Figure 1). A full body computerized tomography (CT) scan and bone scintigraphy didn’t show any other localization of the tumor. The patient underwent a surgical biopsy of the mass. The intervention was performed by a group of senior orthopedic surgeons in an orthopedic surgery department of a university hospital in Tunisia (Figure 2). Histopathological examination found a malignant tumoral proliferation with large areas of necrosis. The tumor was made of small round cells which have a poorly distributed cytoplasm with ill-defined borders and a vacuolated aspect rich in periodic acid Shiff (PAS) positive glycogen. Immunohistochemically these cells were cluster designation (CD20) negative, Desmine and Myogenine negative, cytoKeratine (CK) and CD56 negative, and were positive for CD99 with a heavy membranous marking. The immunohistochemical results also demonstrated a diffuse nuclear positivity for the NKX2.2. The Ki67 proliferative index was 70% (Figures 3, 4, 5). Thus, the diagnosis of Ewing’s sarcoma of the left scapula was confirmed. After a multidisciplinary meeting, the patient had six cycles of neo-adjuvant vincristine, Ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide (VIDE) chemotherapy. This involved Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) intravenous IV Day 1 Doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 IV Days 1, 2 and 3 of cycle Etoposide 150 mg/m2 IV Days 1, 2 and 3 of cycle Ifosfamide 3 g/m2 IV Days 1, 2 and 3 of cycle. The protocol is repeated every 21 days 06 cycles.
An intermediate MRI showed a total response to the treatment. He then underwent an en-bloc total left scapulectomy carrying the scapula, the infraspinatus muscle, the supraspinatus muscle, and the upper part of the deltoid muscle. No postoperative problems were noticed. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of ES, with no residual viable tumor cells Grade IV according to Huvos’ criteria and wide resection margins. The patient continued the protocol with an adjuvant VIDE chemotherapy. After 3 years of clinical and radiological follow-up, an MRI was performed showing the absence of local recurrency. Clinically, the patient has a preserved mobility of the upper limb, arm flexion is possible, and he is capable of doing the hand to mouth movement.
Ewing’s Sarcoma (ES) was first described by James Ewing in 1925.6 ES is a primary osseous neoplasm. It is also part of the Ewing sarcoma tumor family, which includes primitive neuroectodermal tumor, Ewing soft tissue sarcoma, and Askins tumor.6,7 It accounts for 8% of all malignancies and 2% of all primary bone tumors.2,8 ES is a high-grade aggressive lesion, most commonly of bony origin, with large soft-tissue masses and frequent metastases. 15–30% of patients have distant metastases at diagnosis.8,9 The sites of metastasis are mainly lung (85%), bone (69%), pleura (46%), but also lymph nodes (40%) and central nervous system (12%). 4110,11;. ES is the second most common malignant bone tumor in children and young adults. It occurs primarily in the first decade of life (mean age 14 years) and has a slight preference for males. Incidence declines rapidly with increasing age after age 20.4 The average age at diagnosis he is 15 years.2,12 ES is diagnosed in Caucasian Caucasians <25 years of age with an incidence of 0.3/100,000 per year, but is very rare in African and Asian populations.4,13 The ES may affect any bone but is frequent in femur, tibia and ilium and the tumors arising from the scapula comprise fewer than 4% of all ES.1,3 Patients with ES of the scapula are slightly older at time of diagnosis, since these tumors are often asymptomatic and grow quite large before being diagnosed.12 Thus, these tumors are usually discovered late, in the metastatic stage of the disease. No cases of localized ES in adults have been reported to our knowledge. The reported cases of metastatic ES of the scapula in adults over 40 years of age are summarized in Table 1.
Authors | Gender | Age | Tumor site | Metastases | Treatment | Follow-up (Months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mavrogenis et al. (2009)14 | M | 57 | Scapula | Lung | Scapulectomy CT | 12 |
Malik et al. (2020)3 | M | 51 | Scapula | Multimetastases | DOD |
Clinically, ES commonly presents as a dull to severe persistent shoulder pain that gradually increases in size. Although the etiology of the ES remains unknown, it has been confirmed that majority of cases had a cytogenetic translocation consisting of Rearrangements of the EWS gene and a member of the ETS gene family (FLI1) on chromosome 22q12. These translocations define the Ewing sarcoma tumor family (ESFT) and provide valuable tools for accurate and unambiguous diagnosis.15 Radiologically, ES presents as an ill-defined osteolytic lesion, Permeable or worm-eaten bone destruction, often associated with an onion slit-type multi-layered periosteal reaction. On the MRI, the lesion is classically described as a prominent mass that contains areas of necrosis or hemorrhage.3,12,16–18 Histopathologically, typical ES is made of uniform small round blue cells with a clear cytoplasm and distant cellular borders, has a uniform small oval blue nucleus. The principal differential diagnosis with ES are small cell osteosarcoma, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, lymphoma and metastatic neuroblastoma.7,13,19 The diagnosis is confirmed by immunohistochemical examination showing a diffuse strong cytoplasmic membrane positivity for CD99 combined with NKX2.2 positivity and cytogenic examination showing the t (11;22) (q24;q12) translocation.2,20–22 Neither the NKX2.2 nor CD99 alone are entirely specific for the Ewing’s family tumors, but when combined the diagnostic specificity is high. NKX2.2 is positive in 91.5% of the tumors, and CD99 is positive in 99% Before the advent of modern chemotherapy. Fewer than 10% of her ES patients survived more than 5 years after diagnosis when treated with surgery or radiotherapy alone, but it increases to 60–70% in localized tumors when neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy are used in conjunction with surgery/radiotherapy.2,13 Currently, the treatment of the Ewing’s sarcoma Coordinated through cooperative groups. Although multimodality treatment approaches involving a combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation have resulted in modest improvements in localized tumor outcomes. Prognosis remains poor for patients with metastatic disease.3,4,13 The most common surgical approach of the malignant tumors of the scapula was the forequarter amputation until 1970, after that the Tikhoff-Linberg procedure was used.14,23,24 The most used protocol for ES is an intense multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by en bloc excision of the tumor mass and radiotherapy postoperatively if doubt of tumor residue which was achieved with our patient. Adjuvant chemotherapy for consolidation is decided according to the response of the tumor to chemotherapy (Huvos tumor necrosis grading system).3,10,12 Prognostic factors may define subgroups requiring different treatment intensities, the most common are age of the patient, tumor size and location, metastatic pattern, and histologic response to chemotherapy. For the patients with ES of the scapula, those who have metastatic disease, marginal resection, or a chemotherapy response of <80% (Grade I and II of Huvos’ criteria) have the worst prognosis.1,3,25
The ES is common in children and adolescent’s long bones and pelvis, but ES of the scapula in adults is a very rare entity. It is often discovered after a diffuse local progression and distant metastases. Diagnosis is confirmed histologically and immunohistochemically. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery is the most common treatment for localized tumors.
Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.
Elafram, rafik; romdhane, majdi ben (2022): Ewing’s Sarcoma of the Scapula.docx. figshare. Journal contribution. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20508903.v3.26
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Pediatric Oncology, sarcomas, solid tumors, cancer epidemiology
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 10 Oct 22 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)