Keywords
Cucurbita maxima, medicinal plants, druglikeness, natural products, pharmacoinformatics
This article is included in the Cheminformatics gateway.
Cucurbita maxima, medicinal plants, druglikeness, natural products, pharmacoinformatics
Natural products (NP), such as plants and their extracts, have been used to cure diseases in humans and livestock since ancient times (Daina et al., 2017; Greenwell & Rahman, 2015). In modern computer-aided drug design approaches, NPs are considered to be a significant foundation for drug discovery due to their diverse chemical components and their often-unique biomedical properties (Süntar, 2020). Among their unique properties, the NPs are often rich in stereogenic centres and occupy portions of the chemical space that is usually not covered by most synthetic drugs (Marxer et al., 2012).
Cucurbita maxima (commonly known as giant pumpkin) is rich in phenolics, tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, terpenoids, carbohydrates and proteins (Salehi et al., 2019; Sorescu et al., 2020). For centuries, extracts from different parts of the plant have been used to treat various diseases such as intestinal infections, renal failure, hyperplasia, constipation, and parasite infestation (Menendez-Baceta et al., 2014; Kujawska & Pieroni, 2015; Mahomoodally et al., 2016; Mtemeli et al. 2021). Thus, CADD approaches can be applied to investigate the potential of some compounds from this plant to act as drug leads. Before synthesising a compound in the laboratory for testing, modern computational approaches require that the compounds be computationally screened for drug-likeness and potential toxicity.
The standard method to evaluate drug-likeness of a compound is to assess compliance to Lipinski's Rule of Five (Lipinski et al., 1997), which covers the molecular weight, numbers of hydrophilic groups and hydrophobicity. This data note presents a list of C. maxima natural compounds and their computationally calculated data on drug-likeness characteristics, pharmacokinetics, medicinal chemistry parameters and predicted toxicity. Toxicity predictions are important because substructures with known toxic, teratogenic or mutagenic properties negatively affects the usefulness of a designed drug. With data produced in this work, researchers can better predict which C. maxima compounds have a better chance of succeeding throughout all stages of clinical trials, through to drug approval.
To create a library of C. maxima natural compounds, the term 'Cucurbita maxima' was entered into the search box of the Lotus Natural Compounds Database (https://lotus.naturalproducts.net/). The search returned 130 natural products. A file containing the 130 compounds in the structure-data file (SDF) format was downloaded and then fed into BIOVIA Discovery Studio v21.1.0.20298, RRID:SCR_015651 to get the molecular structures in the corresponding simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILE) format. The SMILEs were then used to calculate the various properties of the compounds using the SwissADME (Daina et al., 2017) web tool and the DataWarrior v5.5.0 (Sander et al., 2015) software.
An inherent limitation of computational prediction of drug-likeness is the lack of validated datasets of drugs and non-drugs. Therefore, the classification presented here is solely based on the similarity of structure of the compounds to known drugs. Also compounds from completely new classes are likely to be wrongly classified. Another important limitation of computationally predicted drug-likeness is that it does not predict the biological/pharmacological activity of a compound. Wet bench methods are required to validate the biological/pharmacological activity.
In summary, the dataset presented here will probably be most useful in lead discovery where they could be used for prioritizing compounds for synthesis or for purchasing from external suppliers.
Harvard Dataverse: Underlying data for ‘The Computationally predicted drug-likeness, pharmacokinetics properties, medicinal chemistry parameters, and toxicity properties of Cucurbita maxima compounds’. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4ISBWI (Shoko, 2022).
This project contains the following underlying data:
• Data file 1. (Druglikeness Properties of C. maxima natural compounds.)
• Data file 2. (Medicinal Chemistry Properties of C. maxima natural compounds.)
• Data file 3. (Pharmacokinetics Properties of C. maxima compounds.)
• Data file 4. (Toxicity Properties of C. maxima compounds.)
Data are available under the terms of the CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)
Public Domain Dedication.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Drug Discovery, Medicinal Chemistry, Computer-aided drug design, computational chemistry, RNA biology
Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?
Yes
Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Yes
References
1. Saldívar-González FI, Valli M, Andricopulo AD, da Silva Bolzani V, et al.: Chemical Space and Diversity of the NuBBE Database: A Chemoinformatic Characterization.J Chem Inf Model. 2019; 59 (1): 74-85 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Cheminformatics, Natural products, Drug design, Drug development, Computer-aided drug design.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 31 Oct 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)