Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers

Rahul Khatri; Rahul Goyal; Ravi Kumar Sharma

doi:10.12688/f1000research.126864.2

Home Browse Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Rahul Khatri ¹, Rahul Goyal¹, Ravi Kumar Sharma¹

PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2023

Author details Author details

¹ Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India

Rahul Khatri
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Rahul Goyal
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Ravi Kumar Sharma
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Energy gateway.

This article is included in the International Conference on Clean Energy Systems and Technologies collection.

Abstract

Solar energy is accessible freely and can be utilized for many household and industrial applications. The consumption of solar energy for cooking applications has found significant success. Various innovations have been employed in facilitating cooking during off-sunshine hours. Thermal energy storage helps in overcoming the fluctuations in the supply of energy required for cooking during different time periods of the day. This study focuses on the different types of thermal energy storage mediums that are currently utilized in solar cooking. Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).

The properties and performances of various SHS and latent heat storage (LHS) mediums have been compared for their suitable utilization. SHS materials are cost-effective but have lower thermal gradient compared to LHTES materials. The energy storage capability of LHTES is high while degradation with the increasing number of charging and discharging cycles is also considerable. The melting point should be close to the utilization temperature for being used as LHTES as thermal diffusivity of the materials greatly influences the performance of solar cookers. The cooking time is lower for solar cooking systems equipped with energy storage compared to non-equipped cooking systems. It is recognized that the use of energy storage has been proved as a huge advantage to solar cooking systems, however, the design, and heat transfer characteristics of the cooking vessel along with the storage material type and volume must be optimized in order to make this technology more influential.

Keywords

Solar Energy, Solar Cooker, Energy Storage, Sensible Heat, Latent Heat, Storage Capacity, Thermal Performance and Phase Change Materials

Corresponding author: Rahul Khatri

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2023 Khatri R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Khatri R, Goyal R and Sharma RK. Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2023, 11:1292 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.2) First published: 11 Nov 2022, 11:1292 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.1) Latest published: 21 Feb 2023, 11:1292 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.2)

Revised Amendments from Version 1

A section named "Modified Solar Collectors" is included to show the new energy collection and transfer techniques.
Few figures are included, and corresponding figure numbers have been revised.
A few language edits and sentence corrections have also been made in the updated version.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Brian Norton
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Katlego A. Lentswe

Introduction

The future belongs to renewable energy, as the demand and supply gap of fossil fuel is increasing day by day. Solar energy seems to have the potential to cater to the energy needs of the world as they have grown strongly over the last few decades in terms of energy collected. Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy storage. Many applications of these systems require a continuous supply of energy, but the unavailability of energy during off-sunshine hours limits their use.

Solar energy is one of the simplest green energy options to meet the cooking energy needs. It not only reduces health hazards caused by the use of traditional fuels but it is also eco-friendly. Two types of commonly used direct solar cookers are box type and concentrating type. These may have reflectors for enhancing optical performance or can work without reflectors. In indirect-type solar cooking arrangements, the system may be integrated with flat plate collector (FPC), evacuated tube collector (ETC) or with a concentrating collector.¹ The social importance of solar cookers was explored by Escobar.²

The unavailability of energy during off-sunshine hours is its major drawback. Solar cookers with thermal energy storage (TES) are a good alternative to the traditional cooking methods and also reduce CO₂ emissions in a significant manner.³

This will be highly productive and reliable with the integration of energy storage mediums.⁴^–⁶ It enhances the performance with low running and operating expenses and also permits their use during off-sunshine hours.

Utilization of water and dodecanoic acid as energy storage in solar collector was carried out by Joseph et al.⁷ Water has high charging and discharging rates but low storage capacity while LHES was reported to be potentially better for reducing energy storage volumes.

For high temperature applications, phase change materials (PCM) are most useful, however, their economic feasibility is still unattended. As suggested by Gautam et al.,⁸ sensible heat storage (SHS) combined with PCM can improve the performance of energy storage systems.

The properties of a good TES medium are, melting point of PCM should be same as the working temperature, high energy storage density, high latent heat, and high heat capacity. These are required to have high thermal conductivity for faster heat transfer rates.⁹ High mass to volume ratio and high specific heat are two common desirable properties of energy storage mediums while working with solar energy systems.

Organization of the study

This paper categorizes various research works carried out on solar cooking with thermal energy storage mediums. The utilization of solar energy with modified collectors and energy storage mediums is discussed. Classification of thermal energy storage medium along with a discussion on sensible heat storage mediums and latent heat storage mediums is also presented. The advantages of SHS and latent heat storage (LHS) mediums for suitability in solar cooking applications are also reviewed. Various thermo-physical properties of these materials are also discussed to analyze their use as per the end-user needs.

Modified solar collectors

The improvements in the performance of solar cookers can be achieved with modified energy collection methods. A pyramid type solar cooker as shown in Figure 1a was developed by Kumar et al.,¹⁰ with black painted aluminum absorbing plate. The average temperature of 130 °C was maintained for a long duration in no load condition. The average water temperature attained inside the cooker was 98.6 °C. To achieve higher temperatures for longer duration, a box type solar cooker as shown in Figure 1b was developed and investigated by Mirdha and Dhariwal.¹¹

Figure 1. (a) Pyramid type cooker.¹⁰ (b) Solar cooker with reflectors.¹¹

A CPC based building integrated cooker was developed and analyzed by Harmim et al. (Figure 2).¹² The cooker was fixed on the south wall with an opening in the kitchen. The highest temperature of around 166 °C. This arrangement was found highly useful as it brings solar energy into the kitchen. A funnel based concentrator as shown in Figure 3, was used to focus solar energy on a stove integrated with energy storage medium. Temperature range of 250 °C was achieved with this modification.¹³

Figure 2. CPC based building integrated solar cooker.¹²

Figure 3. Funnel based solar stove.¹³

These modification shows that higher temperatures can be achieved with geometrical modification in the solar cookers. Use of reflectors is the most common method to achieve higher temperature limits.

Classification of thermal energy storage materials

The storage of energy during the daytime for supply during off-sunshine hours is possible if it is stored in one or other form. SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES. SHS mediums do not have a change in their physical state while LHS mediums absorb energy, converting their physical state from solid to liquid, and from liquid to vapor. The heat and temperature variations in LHS and SHS have been presented in Figure 4. The detailed classification of energy storage mediums is presented in Figure 5.

Figure 4. Comparison between latent heat storage (LHS) and sensible heat storage (SHS).¹⁴

Figure 5. Classification of thermal energy storage (TES) mediums.

The heat storage capacity of latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) mediums is high as compared to SHTES medium. As the latent heat of fusion (Q_latent) does not have any temperature change, the charging and discharging include both temperature change and phase change in LHTES.

Energy storage mediums in solar cooking

SHS mediums

SHS mediums store energy in the form of heat creating temperature difference. Materials having a high specific heat are more useful as SHS as they can store higher energy for a unit change of temperature difference. They are relatively cheaper and easily available as compared to other materials, which increase their usefulness.

SHS mediums can be in solid or liquid form. In liquid, water is used in many applications as it is cheaply available and has high specific heat. For high temperature applications, various SHS liquid mediums like oils, liquid metals, or salts can be used. In a few articles,¹⁵^,¹⁶ working of SHS mediums to up to 180°C has been reported, but the increase in the total weight of the system is a concern with these mediums. Economic analysis for different solar concentrating devices used in cooking applications has been carried out by Widjaja et al.,¹⁶ with SHS medium, the payback period for solar cooking system was half of the payback period without SHS.

Saxena et al.¹⁷ experimentally investigated the use of grainy carbon powder as an SHS medium in box-type solar cookers (BTSC); the best output was reported with a composite prepared with LHS i.e. paraffin wax. The use of palm oil as an energy storage medium was studied¹⁸ and it was reported that the heating efficiency was doubled with the use of energy storage mediums. A low cost SHS medium was prepared with sand and carbon for testing with solar cooker.¹⁹ The cooker was found viable for off-sunshine hours cooking with an efficiency of around 37%.

Use of bayburt stone as an SHS medium in BTSC as shown in Figure 6 resulted in efficient cooking during off-sunshine hours. The efficiency improvement of about 40% was achieved with this SHS medium.²⁰ The temperature in solar cooker with Lapland granite rocks used as SHS during experimentation was maintained above 40°C for almost 225 minutes, while without SHS material, it was above 40°C for only 45 minutes. The author²¹ concluded that, when using TES, the cooking capability of the solar cookers can be extended for a longer duration.

Figure 6. Schematic of conventional and sensible heat storage (SHS) integrated solar cookers.²⁰

An oil-pebble bed-based energy storage medium for solar cookers was studied by Mawire et al.²² Methods of charging and discharging the energy storage medium also play an important role in its performance. Engine oil as an energy storage medium with BTSC systems was studied by Nahar.²³ A temperature difference of 23°C was achieved with energy storage compared to a system without energy storage. Food was cooked perfectly during off-sunshine hours where it was not cooked without energy storage medium. The various materials used as SHS medium in solar cooking system along with their thermal and physical properties are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Sensible heat storage (SHS) mediums for solar cooking systems.

S.No.	Cooker type	Material	Density kg/m³	Sp. heat (kJ/kg-K)	Melting point °C	Thermal conductivity kJ/kg-K	Thermal diffusivity m²/s/10⁶	Ref.
1	Box	Grainy carbon powder (GCP)	460	0.93		0.11	10.2	¹⁷
2	Box	Vegetable oil (Palm oil)	915	1.7	24			¹⁸
3	Box	Sand	1450	0.80		0.26	0.35	¹⁹
3	Box	Granular carbon	460	0.93		0.11	1.02	¹⁹
4	Box	Bayburt Stone	2370	0.7144		0.59		²⁰
5	Box	Lapland granite rocks	2092	0.543				²¹
6	PDC	Pebbles	2801	0.745		1.8		²²
7	Box	Engine oil	850	1.76		0.149		²³

LHS mediums

LHS mediums generally have a phase change during energy interactions. During energy exchange, i.e. charging and discharging, the energy can be absorbed in raising the temperature as well as changing the physical state. They are also referred to as PCM. It is desirable to use LHS mediums where uniform temperature needs to be maintained for a longer duration, however, PCM increases the initial cost of the system.²⁴ Chemically, the PCMs must be stable, compatible with materials, should be non-toxic and non-flammable.²⁵

Organic PCMs are the most commonly used energy storage medium in solar cooking. Nitrate salts are mostly used in high temperature applications, while for low and moderate temperatures, organic materials are used. The systems with working temperatures lower than 120°C do not effectively utilize the latent heat storage mediums.²⁶ The various materials used as LHS medium in solar cooking system along with their thermo-physical properties are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Latent heat storage (LHS) mediums for solar cooking systems.

S.No.	Cooker type	Material	Density (kg/m³)	Sp. heat (kJ/kg-K)	Storage capacity (kJ/kg)	Melting point (°C)	Latent heat (kJ/kg)	Thermal conductivity (W/m-K)	Ref.
1	Box	Paraffin wax	800	2	250	41-44		0.2	¹⁷
2	Parabolic dish solar collector (PDSC)	Paraffin	852			80	220		³⁰
3	Box	Erythritol	1480-S 1300-L	1.383-S 2.76-L		117.7	339.8		²⁸
4	Box	Benzoic acid	1270	1.2		121.7	142.8		¹⁸
4	Box	Stearic acid	847	1.8		55.1	160		¹⁸
5	PDSC	Magnesium chloride hexahydrate	1560	1.72-S 2.82-L		118	167	0.57	³⁷
6	PDSC	Solar Salt*	1800			210-220	108.67	0.8	³¹
7	Box	Acetanilide		2		118.9	222		²⁹
8	Box	Solar salt mixture**		1.441		145.14	101.5		³⁵
9		Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate#				89	134		³⁸
10		Galactitol				187-191			³²
11	Parabolic solar collector (PSC)	Stearic acid		1.590		55-70	155		³³
12	PSC	Erythritol	1480-S 1300-L	1.38-S 2.76-L		118	340	0.733-S 0.326-L	³⁴
12	PSC	Paraffin	880-S 770-L	1.8-S 2.4-L		100	140	0.21-S 0.2-L	³⁴
13	Box	Paraffin wax					210		²
14	Box	Commercial grade acetamide	1159-S 998-L	1.94		82	263		³⁹

* Mixture of sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate.

** Mixture of NaNO₂, NaNO₃, and KNO₃.

# (Mg (NO₃)₂ 6H₂O).

Use of organic PCM

Organic PCMs are a group of paraffins and non-paraffin materials. Fatty acids, alcohols, glycols and esters are classified under non-paraffin phase change materials. They have low thermal conductivity in solid phase and are relatively cheap. Paraffin wax is the most commonly used organic PCM as it has comparable thermal properties, i.e., high density and high latent heat.

The cooking efficiency up to 54% can be achieved and cooking time reduced with the use of paraffin as an energy storage medium in BTSC. It was concluded by Saxena et al.¹⁷ that the composite of SHS and LHS performed better than the SHS and LHS individually. The cooking time was reduced by one hour when paraffin wax used as an energy storage medium.²⁷ Comparative studies between solar cooker with and without energy storage was reported by Reddy et al.² Paraffin PCM was used and a temperature difference of 17 °C was maintained during evening time in the cooker with TES compared to the cooker without TES.

Use of erythritol as an energy storage medium was investigated²⁸ using a box-type solar cooker and it was reported that both the charging and discharging time was increased using PCM. Thermal stability of the system was better with PCM during off-sunshine hours. Use of acetanilide as PCM with box-type solar cooking system was investigated by Buddhi et al.,²⁹ showing high temperature for well-cooked food. Use of benzoic acid and stearic acid as LHS medium was studied by Adetifa et al.¹⁸ and it was concluded that the high temperature of water was realized with energy storage, i.e., 80°C, and 50°C was maintained without solar radiations.

Solar cooker with PDC was studied by Senthil³⁰ using paraffin wax as an energy storage medium. Heating time for water was reduced to 90 min compared to 120 min without PCM. Improved productivity and thermal performance of the cooker were observed with PCM. Solar cooking using solar salt as PCM for high temperature application was carried out by Bhave et al.³¹ An indoor experiment was carried out and 170–180°C was easily achieved with this system. The device was found convenient for cooking inside the kitchen and with minor geometrical modifications it can serve different end user needs.

Galactitol as PCM was utilized for medium temperature solar cooking applications by John et al.³² The lifespan of Galactitol as PCM was reported to be less than 100 days if utilized every day for cooking application. Stability at high temperatures of 150°C was reported, but due to the short life span, the author concluded that it is unstable for energy storage applications.

Stearic acid as a PCM using a collapsible parabolic solar cooker was studied by Keith et al.³³ PCM integrated cooking pot is shown in Figure 7 which was used to cook food and subsequently kept it warm for longer duration. The payback period of the developed solar cooking system was found to be less than 53 weeks.

Figure 7. Phase change material (PCM) integrated cooking pot.³³

Paraffin and erythritol were used as energy storage mediums in a parabolic concentrating- type solar cooking system. Lecuona et al.³⁴ concluded that the use of PCM and insulating the utensil after energy storage allows cooking of dinner and next day breakfast. The study also concluded that higher latent heat and conductivity of erythritol are advantageous for faster indoor cooking.

Use of inorganic PCM

Inorganic PCMs are salts, salt hydrates and metal alloys. Salts and salt hydrates have the highest latent heat to volume ratio, thermal conductivity and smooth phase transition. Drawbacks of inorganic salts as reported by Khan et al.²⁴ are change of volume, low thermal conductivity and high cost.

Solar salt was used as an energy storage medium with a box-type solar cooker by Coccia et al.³⁵ It was concluded that thermal stability was improved and heat retention was increased 1.86 times than that without a storage medium. Mussard et al.³⁶ concluded that the use of inorganic PCM like nitrate salt has potential of replacing traditional cooking methods. These systems are slower for traditional cooking but the quality of heat transfer is better in these systems.

Magnesium chloride hexahydrate was used as PCM with parabolic dish solar collector (PDSC) by Bhave et al.³⁷ The cooker with PCM tubes is presented in Figure 8. The PCM was heated upto 130°C i.e., 12°C above the melting point of the PCM. 32.66% utilization was achieved by the developed system.

Figure 8. Storage cooker and aluminium tubes.³⁷

Magnesium nitrate hexahydrate was used as PCM for indirect solar cooking unit by Hussein et al.³⁸ The developed cooker was found suitable for heating or keeping the food hot during off-sunshine hours till the next morning. Box-type solar cooker incorporating acetamide as PCM was experimentally compared with solar cooker without PCM by Sharma et al.³⁹ The results concluded that cooking during off-sunshine hour is possible with cooker incorporated with PCM. Due to heavy weight, metallic PCMs are rarely considered as an energy storage medium in solar cooking.

Heat transfer fluids (HTFs)

Solar energy systems while having energy concentration can store thermal energy in direct or indirect cooking arrangements. HTFs are used to transfer the heat from the source to the indirect cooking system. The heat transfer fluid, while having a major role in transferring the heat, can also behave as an energy storage medium. Few articles suggested that the storage medium can also be used as an HTF.⁴⁰ The high specific heat and thermal conductivity appraise it to behave as energy storage and transfer medium. Low viscosity for minimum pumping power is desirable for heat transfer fluids. Table 3 lists HTFs used in solar cooking and their properties.

Table 3. Heat transfer fluids (HTFs) for solar cooking systems.

S.No.	Cooker type	Material	Density (kg/m³)	Sp. heat (kJ/kg-K)	Flash point °C	Thermal conductivity kJ/kg-K	Ref.
1	PDSC	Therminol (Taurus therm 500)	840	3.22	220	0.11	³¹
2	PDC	Oil	869	1.89	225	0.143	²²
3	PDC	Therminol-55 (Synthetic Oil)					⁴¹
4	PTC	Therminol-55	875		193	0.1276	⁴³

Use of therminol-55 as an HTF for energy modelling of cooking systems was carried out by Bade et al.⁴¹ and proposed this for water scarce regions. It also enhances the heat transfer capability and has a very minimal payback period. Therminol-55 (synthetic oil) was used as heat transfer fluid by Singh⁴² for realizing indoor cooking using solar energy. Vegetable oil was used as HTF in solar cooking system for big families and positive results have been obtained by Schwarzer et al.¹⁵

Discussion and conclusions

Solar cooking can be a potential replacement for traditional cooking systems. This will lead to environmental, economic and health benefits to the end user. Use of solar cookers in conjunction with energy storage mediums to enhance their performance is analyzed for its use during off-sunshine hours. The role of energy storage materials, their importance and advantages in solar cooking application are discussed in detail.

Solar cooking systems using both SHS and LHS have been reviewed and discussed. Use of SHS found limited applications, however, optimized used of these mediums resulted in better thermal output. Pebbles are most commonly used SHS as they have comparable thermal properties, are readily available and are available free of cost.

Most of the studies reviewed used LHTES mediums with solar cooking. The results suggested promising improvement in the performance of solar cooking especially during off-sunshine hours. With moderate melting point and high latent heat of fusion, paraffin wax and erythritol are the most commonly used latent heat storage mediums.

Heat transfer fluids are generally used to integrate the direct and indirect cookers. The feasibility of indoor cooking has been found in a few studies where HTF is highly recommended. Therminol-55 is the most commonly used HTF.

The following conclusions can be drawn from the present study:

• Box-type and parabolic dish-type solar cooker are commonly used solar cooking devices.
• The use of energy storage mediums shows remarkable progress in the thermal output of solar cooking systems.
• Working of solar cooker during evening and till next morning has been found feasible with the use of energy storage.
• Thermal performance improvement with PCM is high whereas economically SHS was found more viable.
• Use of inorganic PCMs i.e. salts and salt hydrates are associated with drawbacks like corrosion, poor heat transfers and phase separation
• SHS can be used for low temperature applications while PCM is recommended for high temperature applications.
• Use of SHS in powder form will be highly advantageous as thermal diffusivity will be high.
• In indirect solar cooker, TES is efficient and safe to use. However, from economic point of view, the use of TES has been found viable for community cooking.
• The composite of SHS and LHS could be a potential area for research in order to improve the performance economically.
• The method of utilization of energy storage mediums also affects their thermal performance.
• Use of HTF can also contribute to the improvements of the performance of solar cooking units, especially with indirect cooking units.
• Various geometrical and design parameters of the cooking vessel and energy storage unit can play a significant role in better output.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

References

1. Muthusivagami RM, Velraj R, Sethumadhavan R: Solar cookers with and without thermal storage-A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010; 14: 691–701. Publisher Full Text
2. De Escobar EM: Low budget solar cookers: An alternative to diminish the use of wood as a source of fuel. Renew. Energy. 1996; 9: 754–757. Publisher Full Text
3. Mallikarjuna Reddy S, Sandeep V, Sreekanth M, et al.: Development and testing of a solar cooker with thermal energy storage system. Int. Energy J. 2017; 17: 185–192.
4. Pandey AK, Hossain MS, Tyagi VV, et al.: Novel approaches and recent developments on potential applications of phase change materials in solar energy. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018; 82: 281–323. Publisher Full Text
5. Senthil R, Cheralathan M: Enhancement of the thermal energy storage capacity of a parabolic dish concentrated solar receiver using phase change materials. J. Energy Storage. 2019; 25: 100841. Publisher Full Text
6. Kashyap V, Sakunkaewkasem S, Jafari P, et al.: Full Spectrum Solar Thermal Energy Harvesting and Storage by a Molecular and Phase-Change Hybrid Material. Joule. 2019; 3: 3100–3111. Publisher Full Text
7. Joseph A, Kabbara M, Groulx D: Characterization and real-time testing of phase-change materials for solar thermal energy storage. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015; 40: 61–70. Publisher Full Text
8. Gautam A, Saini RP: A review on technical, applications and economic aspect of packed bed solar thermal energy storage system. J. Energy Storage. 2020; 27: 101046. Publisher Full Text
9. Khatri R, Goyal R, Sharma RK: Advances in the developments of solar cooker for sustainable development: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021; 145: 111166. Publisher Full Text
10. Kumar N, Agravat S, Chavda T, et al.: Design and development of efficient multipurpose domestic solar cookers/dryers. Renew. Energy. 2008; 33: 2207–2211. Publisher Full Text
11. Mirdha U, Dhariwal S: Design optimization of solar cooker. Renew. Energy. 2008; 33: 530–544. Publisher Full Text
12. Harmim A, Merzouk M, Boukar M, et al.: Design and experimental testing of an innovative building-integrated box type solar cooker. Sol. Energy. 2013; 98: 422–433. Publisher Full Text
13. Kaiyan H, Hongfei Z, Tao T, et al.: Experimental investigation of high temperature congregating energy solar stove with sun light funnel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009; 50: 3051–3055. Publisher Full Text
14. Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009; 32: 596–606. Publisher Full Text
15. Schwarzer K, Vieira da Silva ME: Solar cooking system with or without heat storage for families and institutions. Sol. Energy. 2003; 75: 35–41. Publisher Full Text
16. Widjaja ASN, Löwe K, Costa FS: Design and simulation of a concentrated solar thermal system with an integrated concrete storage for continuous heat supply. Energy Procedia. 2018; 155: 121–135. Publisher Full Text
17. Saxena A, Cuce E, Tiwari GN, et al.: Design and thermal performance investigation of a box cooker with flexible solar collector tubes: An experimental research. Energy. 2020; 206: 118144. Publisher Full Text
18. Adetifa BO, Aremu AK: Computational and experimental study of solar thermal energy store for low-temperature application. J. Energy Storage. 2018; 20: 427–438. Publisher Full Text
19. Saxena A: Performance Evaluation of a Solar Cooker with Low Cost Heat Storage Material. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy. 2017; 6: 57. Publisher Full Text
20. Cuce PM: Box type solar cookers with sensible thermal energy storage medium: A comparative experimental investigation and thermodynamic analysis. Sol. Energy. 2018; 166: 432–440. Publisher Full Text
21. Abate S: Solomon Abate Evaluation of Thermal Energy Storage Materials for Solar Cooker.2014. Reference Source
22. Mawire A, McPherson M, Van Den Heetkamp RRJ: Simulated energy and exergy analyses of the charging of an oil-pebble bed thermal energy storage system for a solar cooker. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2008; 92: 1668–1676. Publisher Full Text
23. Nahar NM: Performance and testing of a hot box storage solar cooker. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003; 44: 1323–1331. Publisher Full Text
24. Khan MMA, Saidur R, Al-Sulaiman FA: A review for phase change materials (PCMs) in solar absorption refrigeration systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 76: 105–137. Publisher Full Text
25. Mohamed SA, Al-Sulaiman FA, Ibrahim NI, et al.: A review on current status and challenges of inorganic phase change materials for thermal energy storage systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 70: 1072–1089. Publisher Full Text
26. Nkhonjera L, Bello-Ochende T, John G, et al.: A review of thermal energy storage designs, heat storage materials and cooking performance of solar cookers with heat storage. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 75: 157–167. Publisher Full Text
27. Arabacigil B, Yuksel N, Avci A: The use of paraffin wax in a new solar cooker with inner and outer reflectors. Therm. Sci. 2015; 19: 1663–1671. Publisher Full Text
28. Coccia G, Aquilanti A, Tomassetti S, et al.: Design, realization, and tests of a portable solar box cooker coupled with an erythritol-based PCM thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy. 2020; 201: 530–540. Publisher Full Text
29. Buddhi D, Sharma SD, Sharma A: Thermal performance evaluation of a latent heat storage unit for late evening cooking in a solar cooker having three reflectors. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003; 44: 809–817. Publisher Full Text
30. Senthil R: Enhancement of productivity of parabolic dish solar cooker using integrated phase change material. Mater Today Proc. 2020; 34: 386–388. Publisher Full Text
31. Bhave AG, Kale CK: Development of a thermal storage type solar cooker for high temperature cooking using solar salt. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2020; 208: 110394. Publisher Full Text
32. John G, König-Haagen A, King’ondu CK, et al.: Galactitol as phase change material for latent heat storage of solar cookers: Investigating thermal behavior in bulk cycling. Sol. Energy. 2015; 119: 415–421. Publisher Full Text
33. Keith A, Brown NJ, Zhou JL: The feasibility of a collapsible parabolic solar cooker incorporating phase change materials. Renew. Energy Focus. 2019; 30: 58–70. Publisher Full Text
34. Lecuona A, Nogueira JI, Ventas R, et al.: Solar cooker of the portable parabolic type incorporating heat storage based on PCM. Appl. Energy. 2013; 111: 1136–1146. Publisher Full Text
35. Coccia G, Di Nicola G, Tomassetti S, et al.: Experimental validation of a high-temperature solar box cooker with a solar-salt-based thermal storage unit. Sol. Energy. 2018; 170: 1016–1025. Publisher Full Text
36. Mussard M, Gueno A, Nydal OJ: Experimental study of solar cooking using heat storage in comparison with direct heating. Sol. Energy. 2013; 98: 375–383. Publisher Full Text
37. Bhave AG, Thakare KA: Development of a solar thermal storage cum cooking device using salt hydrate. Sol. Energy. 2018; 171: 784–789. Publisher Full Text
38. Hussein HMS, El-Ghetany HH, Nada SA: Experimental investigation of novel indirect solar cooker with indoor PCM thermal storage and cooking unit. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008; 49: 2237–2246. Publisher Full Text
39. Sharma SD, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL, et al.: Design, development and performance evaluation of a latent heat storage unit for evening cooking in a solar cooker. Energy Convers. Manag. 2000; 41: 1497–1508. Publisher Full Text
40. Stutz B, Le Pierres N, Kuznik F, et al.: Stockage thermique de l’énergie solaire. Comptes. Rendus. Phys. 2017; 18: 401–414. Publisher Full Text
41. Bade MH, Bandyopadhyay S: Energy Modelling of Thermal Oil Based Cooking System. Energy Procedia. 2015; 75: 1746–1751. Publisher Full Text
42. Singh OK: Development of a solar cooking system suitable for indoor cooking and its exergy and enviroeconomic analyses. Sol. Energy. 2021; 217: 223–234. Publisher Full Text
43. Kumaresan G, Vigneswaran VS, Esakkimuthu S, et al.: Performance assessment of a solar domestic cooking unit integrated with thermal energy storage system. J. Energy Storage. 2016; 6: 70–79. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Nov 2022

Author details Author details

¹ Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India

Rahul Khatri
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Rahul Goyal
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Ravi Kumar Sharma
Roles: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Revised

Published: 21 Feb 2023, 11:1292

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.2

version 1

Published: 11 Nov 2022, 11:1292

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.1

© 2023 Khatri R et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Khatri R, Goyal R and Sharma RK. Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2023, 11:1292 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.126864.2)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2023

Revised

Views

Reviewer Report 11 May 2023

Katlego A. Lentswe, Department of Physics and Electronics, Material Science, Innovation and Modelling (MaSIM) Research Focus Area, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.144549.r164093

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

Reviewer Report 04 May 2023

Brian Norton, International Energy Research Centre, Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.144549.r164094

The authors' revision of the paper ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 11 Nov 2022

Views

Reviewer Report 07 Dec 2022

Katlego A. Lentswe, Department of Physics and Electronics, Material Science, Innovation and Modelling (MaSIM) Research Focus Area, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139317.r155692

The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”
For Figure 1 I suggest that

The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”
For Figure 1 I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.
“Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.
I suggest a major revision because the format of the manuscript is disorganized.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Solar cooker with thermal energy storage systems

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

21 Feb 2023

Author Response

S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”
... Continue reading S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”

Response
The study was carried out for future developments in solar cookers. However, requested the editor for suggestion.

S. No 2
Comment

For Figure 1, I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.

Response
Figure 1 is cited from the following article,
“Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009;32:596–606”. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.010

S. No 3
Comment
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.

Response
Modified as suggested.

S. No 4
Comment
Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.

Response
The backup word is replaced with storage.

S. No 5
Comment
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.

Response
The introduction section is modified as per the suggestion

S. No 6
Comment
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.

Response
“Methods” heading is replaced by “Organization of the study”

S. No 7
Comment
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.

Response
Modified as suggested.
S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”

Response
The study was carried out for future developments in solar cookers. However, requested the editor for suggestion.

S. No 2
Comment

For Figure 1, I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.

Response
Figure 1 is cited from the following article,
“Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009;32:596–606”. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.010

S. No 3
Comment
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.

Response
Modified as suggested.

S. No 4
Comment
Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.

Response
The backup word is replaced with storage.

S. No 5
Comment
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.

Response
The introduction section is modified as per the suggestion

S. No 6
Comment
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.

Response
“Methods” heading is replaced by “Organization of the study”

S. No 7
Comment
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.

Response
Modified as suggested.
Competing Interests: NA Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

21 Feb 2023

Author Response

S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”
... Continue reading S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”

Response
The study was carried out for future developments in solar cookers. However, requested the editor for suggestion.

S. No 2
Comment

For Figure 1, I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.

Response
Figure 1 is cited from the following article,
“Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009;32:596–606”. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.010

S. No 3
Comment
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.

Response
Modified as suggested.

S. No 4
Comment
Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.

Response
The backup word is replaced with storage.

S. No 5
Comment
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.

Response
The introduction section is modified as per the suggestion

S. No 6
Comment
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.

Response
“Methods” heading is replaced by “Organization of the study”

S. No 7
Comment
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.

Response
Modified as suggested.
S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”

Response
The study was carried out for future developments in solar cookers. However, requested the editor for suggestion.

S. No 2
Comment

For Figure 1, I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.

Response
Figure 1 is cited from the following article,
“Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009;32:596–606”. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.010

S. No 3
Comment
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.

Response
Modified as suggested.

S. No 4
Comment
Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.

Response
The backup word is replaced with storage.

S. No 5
Comment
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.

Response
The introduction section is modified as per the suggestion

S. No 6
Comment
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.

Response
“Methods” heading is replaced by “Organization of the study”

S. No 7
Comment
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.

Response
Modified as suggested.
Competing Interests: NA Close
Report a concern

Views

Reviewer Report 15 Nov 2022

Brian Norton, International Energy Research Centre, Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.139317.r155694

This paper provides a review of the use of sensible phase change materials for energy storage in solar cookers. Energy storage is required in solar cookers if their use is to be extended to applications where cooking is either in the evening or at night. Solar cookers used at such times are unlikely to be located outdoors so fluids for the transfer of heat from the outdoor to the indoor environment are also summarized.

The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?

Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.

The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Solar energy applications.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

21 Feb 2023

Author Response

S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used ... Continue reading S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?
Response
The section named “Modified Solar Collectors” is included as per the suggestion.

The Conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 2
Comment
Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.
Response
The conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 3
The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Response
Figure 1 is used to compare LHS and SHS over a wide range of temperatures. Specific melting temperature is considered for PCM in this figure.
S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?
Response
The section named “Modified Solar Collectors” is included as per the suggestion.

The Conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 2
Comment
Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.
Response
The conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 3
The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Response
Figure 1 is used to compare LHS and SHS over a wide range of temperatures. Specific melting temperature is considered for PCM in this figure.
Competing Interests: NA Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

21 Feb 2023

Author Response

S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used ... Continue reading S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?
Response
The section named “Modified Solar Collectors” is included as per the suggestion.

The Conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 2
Comment
Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.
Response
The conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 3
The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Response
Figure 1 is used to compare LHS and SHS over a wide range of temperatures. Specific melting temperature is considered for PCM in this figure.
S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?
Response
The section named “Modified Solar Collectors” is included as per the suggestion.

The Conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 2
Comment
Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.
Response
The conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 3
The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Response
Figure 1 is used to compare LHS and SHS over a wide range of temperatures. Specific melting temperature is considered for PCM in this figure.
Competing Interests: NA Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Nov 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 2 (revision) 21 Feb 23	read	read
Version 1 11 Nov 22	read	read

Brian Norton, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Katlego A. Lentswe, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

5 Views

11 May 2023 | for Version 2

Katlego A. Lentswe, Department of Physics and Electronics, Material Science, Innovation and Modelling (MaSIM) Research Focus Area, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa

5 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Solar cooker with thermal energy storage systems

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

04 May 2023 | for Version 2

Brian Norton, International Energy Research Centre, Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The authors' revision of the paper successfully address the comments of reviewers.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

35 Views

07 Dec 2022 | for Version 1

Katlego A. Lentswe, Department of Physics and Electronics, Material Science, Innovation and Modelling (MaSIM) Research Focus Area, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa

35 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”
For Figure 1 I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.
“Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.
I suggest a major revision because the format of the manuscript is disorganized.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Solar cooker with thermal energy storage systems

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

S. No 1
Comment
The author could rephrase the topic from “Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers” to “Analysis of energy storage materials for solar cookers”

Response
The study was carried out for future developments in solar cookers. However, requested the editor for suggestion.

S. No 2
Comment

For Figure 1, I suggest that the author use a different figure similar to that used in “Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review” by Jouhara et al.

Response
Figure 1 is cited from the following article,
“Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009;32:596–606”. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.02.010

S. No 3
Comment
On the abstract the following sentence “Primarily, oils and pebbles are most commonly used as sensible heat storage (SHS) while organic phase change materials (PCMs) are used as latent heat thermal energy storage materials (LHTES).” Can be modified I suggest the author must also include water because it has been utilized extensively over the years.

Response
Modified as suggested.

S. No 4
Comment
Solar thermal energy systems have higher efficiencies, but they lack in the aspect of energy backup.” I suggest the author must use “storage” than backup.

Response
The backup word is replaced with storage.

S. No 5
Comment
On the introduction section the author couldn’t properly link the sentences and paragraphs it was very confusing and not easy to follow.

Response
The introduction section is modified as per the suggestion

S. No 6
Comment
I think the method section was not supposed to be included because this is a review paper, rather a heading that will indicate or show the classification section.

Response
“Methods” heading is replaced by “Organization of the study”

S. No 7
Comment
This sentence does not sense “TES can be classified under SHS and LHS mediums.” Rather say SHS and LHS mediums are classified under TES.

Response
Modified as suggested.

View more View less

Competing Interests

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

51 Views

15 Nov 2022 | for Version 1

Brian Norton, International Energy Research Centre, Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

51 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved With Reservations

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Solar energy applications.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

21 Feb 2023

Rahul Khatri, Mechanical Engineering Department, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

S.No. 1
Comment
The paper could provide a more comprehensive and complete review of the literature on this topic. In particular on (i) the solar collectors or inverted absorber mirrors used to transfer heat indoors and (ii) the charging/discharging rates of the various heat storage materials when combined with a range of heat transfer enhancements. The conclusions presented need to be linked to specific previous work. Some conclusions seem odd; for example, is it universally true that PCMs with lower melting points have shorter lives as they cycle more often?
Response
The section named “Modified Solar Collectors” is included as per the suggestion.

The Conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 2
Comment
Some conclusions are lacunae, for example "use of PCM reduces storage volumes compared with SHS medium; true but only if the application requires a large amount of heat stored at the phase transition temperature; for heat stored over wide temperature range the difference in volume is less.
Response
The conclusion is modified/removed as suggested.

S.No. 3
The work should be contextualized more realistically, for example, in bulk PCMs the phase transition takes place over a range of temperatures as unmelted PCM material convects within that already melted. The PCM line in Figure 1 thus does not apply to the bulk materials discussed in this paper.

Response
Figure 1 is used to compare LHS and SHS over a wide range of temperatures. Specific melting temperature is considered for PCM in this figure.

View more View less

Competing Interests

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Muthusivagami RM, Velraj R, Sethumadhavan R: Solar cookers with and without thermal storage-A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2010; 14: 691–701. Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. De Escobar EM: Low budget solar cookers: An alternative to diminish the use of wood as a source of fuel. Renew. Energy. 1996; 9: 754–757. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Mallikarjuna Reddy S, Sandeep V, Sreekanth M, et al.: Development and testing of a solar cooker with thermal energy storage system. Int. Energy J. 2017; 17: 185–192.

[4] 4. Pandey AK, Hossain MS, Tyagi VV, et al.: Novel approaches and recent developments on potential applications of phase change materials in solar energy. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018; 82: 281–323. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Senthil R, Cheralathan M: Enhancement of the thermal energy storage capacity of a parabolic dish concentrated solar receiver using phase change materials. J. Energy Storage. 2019; 25: 100841. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Kashyap V, Sakunkaewkasem S, Jafari P, et al.: Full Spectrum Solar Thermal Energy Harvesting and Storage by a Molecular and Phase-Change Hybrid Material. Joule. 2019; 3: 3100–3111. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Joseph A, Kabbara M, Groulx D: Characterization and real-time testing of phase-change materials for solar thermal energy storage. Int. J. Energy Res. 2015; 40: 61–70. Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Gautam A, Saini RP: A review on technical, applications and economic aspect of packed bed solar thermal energy storage system. J. Energy Storage. 2020; 27: 101046. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Khatri R, Goyal R, Sharma RK: Advances in the developments of solar cooker for sustainable development: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021; 145: 111166. Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Kumar N, Agravat S, Chavda T, et al.: Design and development of efficient multipurpose domestic solar cookers/dryers. Renew. Energy. 2008; 33: 2207–2211. Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Mirdha U, Dhariwal S: Design optimization of solar cooker. Renew. Energy. 2008; 33: 530–544. Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Harmim A, Merzouk M, Boukar M, et al.: Design and experimental testing of an innovative building-integrated box type solar cooker. Sol. Energy. 2013; 98: 422–433. Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Kaiyan H, Hongfei Z, Tao T, et al.: Experimental investigation of high temperature congregating energy solar stove with sun light funnel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009; 50: 3051–3055. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Helm M, Keil C, Hiebler S, et al.: Solar heating and cooling system with absorption chiller and low temperature latent heat storage: Energetic performance and operational experience. Int. J. Refrig. 2009; 32: 596–606. Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Schwarzer K, Vieira da Silva ME: Solar cooking system with or without heat storage for families and institutions. Sol. Energy. 2003; 75: 35–41. Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Widjaja ASN, Löwe K, Costa FS: Design and simulation of a concentrated solar thermal system with an integrated concrete storage for continuous heat supply. Energy Procedia. 2018; 155: 121–135. Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Saxena A, Cuce E, Tiwari GN, et al.: Design and thermal performance investigation of a box cooker with flexible solar collector tubes: An experimental research. Energy. 2020; 206: 118144. Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. Adetifa BO, Aremu AK: Computational and experimental study of solar thermal energy store for low-temperature application. J. Energy Storage. 2018; 20: 427–438. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Saxena A: Performance Evaluation of a Solar Cooker with Low Cost Heat Storage Material. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy. 2017; 6: 57. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Cuce PM: Box type solar cookers with sensible thermal energy storage medium: A comparative experimental investigation and thermodynamic analysis. Sol. Energy. 2018; 166: 432–440. Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Abate S: Solomon Abate Evaluation of Thermal Energy Storage Materials for Solar Cooker.2014. Reference Source

[22] 22. Mawire A, McPherson M, Van Den Heetkamp RRJ: Simulated energy and exergy analyses of the charging of an oil-pebble bed thermal energy storage system for a solar cooker. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2008; 92: 1668–1676. Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Nahar NM: Performance and testing of a hot box storage solar cooker. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003; 44: 1323–1331. Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Khan MMA, Saidur R, Al-Sulaiman FA: A review for phase change materials (PCMs) in solar absorption refrigeration systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 76: 105–137. Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Mohamed SA, Al-Sulaiman FA, Ibrahim NI, et al.: A review on current status and challenges of inorganic phase change materials for thermal energy storage systems. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 70: 1072–1089. Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Nkhonjera L, Bello-Ochende T, John G, et al.: A review of thermal energy storage designs, heat storage materials and cooking performance of solar cookers with heat storage. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017; 75: 157–167. Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Arabacigil B, Yuksel N, Avci A: The use of paraffin wax in a new solar cooker with inner and outer reflectors. Therm. Sci. 2015; 19: 1663–1671. Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Coccia G, Aquilanti A, Tomassetti S, et al.: Design, realization, and tests of a portable solar box cooker coupled with an erythritol-based PCM thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy. 2020; 201: 530–540. Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Buddhi D, Sharma SD, Sharma A: Thermal performance evaluation of a latent heat storage unit for late evening cooking in a solar cooker having three reflectors. Energy Convers. Manag. 2003; 44: 809–817. Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Senthil R: Enhancement of productivity of parabolic dish solar cooker using integrated phase change material. Mater Today Proc. 2020; 34: 386–388. Publisher Full Text

[31] 31. Bhave AG, Kale CK: Development of a thermal storage type solar cooker for high temperature cooking using solar salt. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2020; 208: 110394. Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. John G, König-Haagen A, King’ondu CK, et al.: Galactitol as phase change material for latent heat storage of solar cookers: Investigating thermal behavior in bulk cycling. Sol. Energy. 2015; 119: 415–421. Publisher Full Text

[33] 33. Keith A, Brown NJ, Zhou JL: The feasibility of a collapsible parabolic solar cooker incorporating phase change materials. Renew. Energy Focus. 2019; 30: 58–70. Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Lecuona A, Nogueira JI, Ventas R, et al.: Solar cooker of the portable parabolic type incorporating heat storage based on PCM. Appl. Energy. 2013; 111: 1136–1146. Publisher Full Text

[35] 35. Coccia G, Di Nicola G, Tomassetti S, et al.: Experimental validation of a high-temperature solar box cooker with a solar-salt-based thermal storage unit. Sol. Energy. 2018; 170: 1016–1025. Publisher Full Text

[36] 36. Mussard M, Gueno A, Nydal OJ: Experimental study of solar cooking using heat storage in comparison with direct heating. Sol. Energy. 2013; 98: 375–383. Publisher Full Text

[37] 37. Bhave AG, Thakare KA: Development of a solar thermal storage cum cooking device using salt hydrate. Sol. Energy. 2018; 171: 784–789. Publisher Full Text

[38] 38. Hussein HMS, El-Ghetany HH, Nada SA: Experimental investigation of novel indirect solar cooker with indoor PCM thermal storage and cooking unit. Energy Convers. Manag. 2008; 49: 2237–2246. Publisher Full Text

[39] 39. Sharma SD, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL, et al.: Design, development and performance evaluation of a latent heat storage unit for evening cooking in a solar cooker. Energy Convers. Manag. 2000; 41: 1497–1508. Publisher Full Text

[40] 40. Stutz B, Le Pierres N, Kuznik F, et al.: Stockage thermique de l’énergie solaire. Comptes. Rendus. Phys. 2017; 18: 401–414. Publisher Full Text

[41] 41. Bade MH, Bandyopadhyay S: Energy Modelling of Thermal Oil Based Cooking System. Energy Procedia. 2015; 75: 1746–1751. Publisher Full Text

[42] 42. Singh OK: Development of a solar cooking system suitable for indoor cooking and its exergy and enviroeconomic analyses. Sol. Energy. 2021; 217: 223–234. Publisher Full Text

[43] 43. Kumaresan G, Vigneswaran VS, Esakkimuthu S, et al.: Performance assessment of a solar domestic cooking unit integrated with thermal energy storage system. J. Energy Storage. 2016; 6: 70–79. Publisher Full Text

Analysis of energy storage materials for developments in solar cookers

Abstract

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Introduction

Organization of the study

Modified solar collectors

Figure 1. (a) Pyramid type cooker.10 (b) Solar cooker with reflectors.11

Figure 2. CPC based building integrated solar cooker.12

Figure 3. Funnel based solar stove.13

Classification of thermal energy storage materials

Figure 4. Comparison between latent heat storage (LHS) and sensible heat storage (SHS).14

Figure 5. Classification of thermal energy storage (TES) mediums.

Energy storage mediums in solar cooking

Figure 6. Schematic of conventional and sensible heat storage (SHS) integrated solar cookers.20

Table 1. Sensible heat storage (SHS) mediums for solar cooking systems.

Table 2. Latent heat storage (LHS) mediums for solar cooking systems.

Figure 7. Phase change material (PCM) integrated cooking pot.33

Figure 8. Storage cooker and aluminium tubes.37

Table 3. Heat transfer fluids (HTFs) for solar cooking systems.

Discussion and conclusions

Data availability

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated

Figure 1. (a) Pyramid type cooker.¹⁰ (b) Solar cooker with reflectors.¹¹

Figure 2. CPC based building integrated solar cooker.¹²

Figure 3. Funnel based solar stove.¹³

Figure 4. Comparison between latent heat storage (LHS) and sensible heat storage (SHS).¹⁴

Figure 6. Schematic of conventional and sensible heat storage (SHS) integrated solar cookers.²⁰

Figure 7. Phase change material (PCM) integrated cooking pot.³³

Figure 8. Storage cooker and aluminium tubes.³⁷