ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Mental health status of women in reproductive age group and its determinants in rural Odisha, India using GHQ 12 questionnaire

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 06 Dec 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background: The study was conceived with support from the Department of Health Research (DHR), India to use the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), to screen women in the reproductive age group, stratified for pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant and non-lactate women (NPNL), for their mental health status and examine it with their social background to understand the influences around their mental health.  
Methods: By multistage sampling, subcenters were selected from 6 districts; women in the 3 groups were selected proportionately in each district, and data was collected on the basis of a pre-tested, pre-designed questionnaire along with the GHQ-12.  
Results: Results showed GHQ-12 scores across the 3 categories of women are nearly the same with no significant difference (p=0.91). The higher GHQ (scores >11 to 36) were also noted to be equal for pregnant and lactating women i.e. 41.4% and mildly less for NPNL women 40.7%, reaffirming that pregnancy and the postnatal period add more stress to the woman’s life. Age of the women, age at marriage, hemoglobin levels, and poor Iron Folic Acid (IFA) intake were common predictors for poor mental health in all the 3 strata. 
Conclusions: The study suggests that psychological stressors are cross-sectionally present in all three groups of women in the reproductive age group and all three strata need equal focus. Above 40% distress in mental health in women in all strata of the reproductive age group (ie pregnant women, post-natal women, and women not pregnant or lactating) is appalling, contrary to the general opinion that post-natal women alone face mental health compromise. Hence, the life cycle approach is recommended for best results.

Keywords

Mental health, GHQ-12 scores, women in reproductive age group, antenatal women, post natal women, Non pregnant and non lactating women (NPNL), Asian, anxiety, behavior

Introduction

Much of the focus of decades in Indian policy, practice, and research related to women of reproductive age has been devoted to the prevention and management of risks associated with preterm birth, low birth weight, and to some extent immediate risky postpartum signs and symptoms. India's maternal mortality ratio (MMR) has improved to 103 in 2017-19, from 113 in 2016-18, while that of Odisha is reported as 126 per lakh live births. This is according to the special bulletin on MMR released by the Registrar General of India March 14, 2022 (RGI, India report, 2022).

One in three to one in five women in developing countries, and about one in ten in developed countries, have a significant mental health problem during pregnancy and after childbirth. For example, high rates of mental health problems in pregnant women and mothers have been reported in many countries in Africa such as Ethiopia and Nigeria (World Health Organization, 2008). Women, especially those living in developing countries are more exposed to risk factors, which increase their susceptibility to developing mental health problems. Some of these include poor socioeconomic status, less valued social roles and status, unintended pregnancy, and gender-based violence (Prince, M et al., 2007; Johnson AR et al., 2015).

Core features such as lethargy, disinterest, and lack of appetite are associated with motherhood itself and/or part of the gender stereotype which is inclusive of motherhood. Hence, these women are less likely to seek and receive antenatal or postnatal care or adhere to prescribed health regimens, which is subtly suggested by research (Khanna, T et al., 2021).

Poor mental health of women also affects their ability to take care of their newborns. Maternal depression in resource-constrained settings is linked directly to lower infant birth weight, higher rates of malnutrition and stunting, and higher rates of diarrheal disease, infectious illness, hospital admission, etc. It also adversely affects the physical, cognitive, social, behavioral, and emotional development of children (WHO Meeting Report, 2008). Thus, it is very conclusive that efforts to achieve Millennium Development Goal 5, “improve maternal health”, should include measures to prevent and manage mental health problems during pregnancy, after childbirth, and even generally for women in the reproductive age group (Prince, M et al., 2007).

Simply, there can be “No health without mental health” (Prince, M et al., 2007). Programs aimed at achieving Sustainable Developmental Goals 2025 should integrate mental health approaches within their strategies for improved maternal mental health. This study aims to assess the extent of the problem primarily in the rural population in an underserved state of India and in the process validate a simple questionnaire-based community tool that can be used by ground-level health workers.

Objectives

  • Assess mental health of women: For the proposed study, the target group will be women in the reproductive age group i.e., 18 to 49 years in rural Odisha. The reproductive age group is defined as women 18 years and above as 18 years is the legal marriage age in India.

  • To assess the various psychosocial associated factors affecting mental health in the sample as a whole and also in the subgroups.

Methods

The reference period for the study was 2015 to 2017. As vulnerability for mental ill-health is high, especially during the antenatal and postnatal period, the study proposes to categorize the selection of women into those from the antenatal period (above 12 weeks of gestation); postnatal period (up until three months after delivery), and those who do not fall into either, i.e., any women between 18-49 years.

Sampling

Prevalence of mental ill health as reported among Indian urban slum women o calculate the sample size as there were no current Indian studies citing the prevalence in rural women. Using the formula 4pq/r 2, a minimal sample size required at a confidence limit of 95% and accepting a difference of up to 4% of the true population was calculated at approximately 254.

Adding 20% as a non-response rate, another 50 can be added taking the sample to nearly (a close proxy for rural women) around 12% (Vachher, AS & Sharma, AK, 2010) and 300 in each category. Since a multistage sampling is being planned, a design effect of 1.2 was used. Thus 1200 women would be a statistically adequate sample for the given study. Sample households with sample villages would be the primary stage units (PSU) and the women categories within the selected villages would be the ultimate stage units (USU).

According to the 2004 Human Development Index (HDI) report (development is here taken as a proxy for good mental health) 20%, i.e., 6 districts, which as per the National Family Health Survey (NFHS 2002-3) criteria suffices to represent the state, which was picked up randomly after putting them in 3 slots of high, middle and average rated districts. To suit the sample size, 7 districts were eventually included.

In each district, one block was selected randomly from which two upgraded Primary Health Centers i.e., PHCs (catering to a population of 1lakh or above) were selected randomly and then 3 sub centers i.e., SC (the 1st service delivery point at the village level, manned by a nurse) each selected randomly. 15 antenatal/15 postnatal and 15 women in the reproductive age group would be selected randomly (5 in each category from each subcenter). Table 1 in results describes the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of women into the three groups.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of women in the 3 categories of women.

Category of womenInclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
Antenatal women

  • In age group 18-49 yrs

  • Currently married

  • Willing to participate-registered with AWW/SC

  • >12 weeks of pregnancy

  • Any birth order

  • High-risk pregnancy

  • Precious pregnancy

  • Pregnancy without wedlock

  • Suffering from any diagnosed mental ill-health or any medical illness

  • Unwilling to participate

Postnatal women

  • In age group 18-49 yrs

  • Been married

  • Willing to participate

  • Registered with AWW/SC

  • Baby less than 6 months of age

  • Both normal delivery and caesarian can be included

  • Currently suffering from post-natal complications like fever, sepsis

  • Baby suffering from any chronic illness or congenital malformation

  • Suffering from any diagnosed mental ill health or any medical illness

  • Unwilling to participate

Women of reproductive age group

  • In age group 18-49 yrs

  • Been married

  • Willing to participate

  • Destitute

  • Suffering from any diagnosed mental ill health or any medical illness like TB, filarial, malaria etc.

  • Unwilling to participate

Thus, at the block level, 90 women were drawn for the study, including 30 in each category. For this selection, the help of the respective ground-level workers was sought, after information was given and consent was obtained from the respective PHC Medical Officer and sampled District Chief Medical Officer (CMO). The same would be done for two blocks. Care was taken to select the blocks according to the feasibility and health care concerns of the area.

Given that we have 6 districts, the total sample size would be 180X6=1080; thus we had to take another district in order to get an adequate sample size of nearly 1200 i.e.1080+180=1260.

The inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria in each category would be as follows:

Ethical considerations

The study design, as well as the tools, were approved by the KIMS Institutional ethics committee (approval number: KIMS/KIIT/IEC/599/2014) as well as the State ethics committee after the award of the DHR project, as is the mandate in Odisha state for any population-level study.

Data collection

After due informed consent, a questionnaire-based interview was done for the selected respondent women. This was a locally modified and adapted version of WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence (World Health Organization, 2008) with GHQ-12 (Goldberg, D & Williams, P, 1988) The questionnaire was finalized after due consultation with a psychologist and psychiatrist for appropriateness in the Indian context and especially in the rural context, checked for validity and internal construct. The standard “forward-backward” procedure (Lee, WL et al., 2019) was applied to translate the questionnaire from English into Odia. The final Odia version was arrived at by a consensus decision by all four translators with attention to the content, semantic, technical and conceptual equivalence of the Odia version. A copy of the questionnaire can be found under Extended data (Kar, S, 2022).

A pilot testing exercise was carried out in the urban slums under the Department of Community Medicine and the comprehension of all questions by the people was assessed before final use in the study.

The twelve-item GHQ-12 was intended to screen for general (non-psychotic) psychiatric morbidity (Goldberg, D and Williams, P, 1988). It has been widely used and, as a result, translated into many languages and extensively validated in general and clinical populations worldwide (Jacob KS et al., 1998; Patel V, Pereira J, Mann AH, 1998; De A et al., 2017). GHQ-12 offers the practical advantage of brevity, which makes it acceptable to primary health care physicians or ground level health workers as a clinical screening tool (Patel V, Pereira J, Mann AH, 1998). Factor analysis of the GHQ produced two-factor solutions, which measures anxiety, depression and social performance. It has been translated into Kannada (Shamasundar et al., 1986) and Hindi (Gautam S, Nijhawan, M & Kamal, P, 1987) and hence validated, tried, and tested in the Indian population and more so among women, which is also the expected study population for the given study and the Odia version also gave a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.8.

The 12 items describe mood states, six of which are positively phrased (positive items, labeled items P1 to P6) and six negatively phrased (negative items, labeled N1 to N6). The Likert scale scoring of 0,1,2,3 was used to derive the mental health score, which yielded scores from 0-36. The positive items were corrected from 0 (always) to 3 (never) and the negative ones from 3 (always) to 0 (never). High scores indicate worse mental health. In most studies, the 0,0,1,1 scoring is also validated and hence the score varied from 0-12 and a score of 2/3 was taken as the cut-off for poor mental health (De et al., 2017). However, among the less literate population of the study sample, this scoring was not very conclusive, and the Likert scale achieved more accurate results as it produced a more acceptable distribution of scores for parametric analysis (less skewed and less kurtosis (Shamasundar, C, et al., 1986).

It is recommended that the mean GHQ score for the whole sample population of respondents provides a rough guide to the best cut-off threshold (Gautam S, Nijhawan, M & Kamal, P, 1987). This clearly suggests that if investigators wish to use it as a screening instrument, which is also the long-term goal of this study, the shorter GHQ is remarkably robust and works as well as the longer instrument (Goldberg DP, Oldhinkel T, Ormel J, 1998).

In this sample, the mean GHQ came out to be 10.45 (SD:4.48). Hence, we took 11 as the cut-off for normal and scores above 11 were offering a valid measure of psychological distress, which is a proxy for mental ill-health.

Results

The mean GHQ score among all the 1260 subjects was 10.45 (SD: 4.48). No difference was observed between all the 3 strata of women in terms of GHQ-12, the average score being <11 in all the 3 strata and the intergroup differences were not significant, p=0.778, wherein 41.4% of pregnant and lactating women and 40.7% NPNL had higher GHQ scores. This raises concerns, even though this was not statistically significant in this study (p=0.971).

Table 2 shows the total prevalence of women with higher GHQ is 41.19% (519/1260); the mean age of women respondents in total women subjects is 26 years and the mean age of antenatal women with GHQ more than 11 is on the higher side which is highly significant; the mean age of marriage is 19.94±2.56 years for antenatal women and it is statistically very significant for higher GHQ scores. All the 3 strata reported higher GHQs for lower age at marriage. The full raw data can be found under Underlying data (Kar, S., 2022). For total subjects, as well as cross-sectionally for all the 3 subgroups, the higher GHQs were associated with lower hemoglobin values suggesting anemia. Similarly, mean iron folic acid intake (in terms of days of consumption) was reported with wide standard deviations and was significant for antenatal women, with those with higher GHQ scores consuming for 62.94±49.29 days as against the current Government of India recommendation of prophylactic IFA consumption for 180 days (note: reporting data may have a lot of bias). Birth weight which was noted for the current child in the postnatal group showed lower birth weights being significantly associated with higher GHQs.

Table 2. Variations in continuous variables used in the study for total subjects (antenatal/post-natal/non pregnant non lactating women).

ParameterTotal subjects N=1260Antenatal N=420Postnatal N=420NPNL N=420
GHQS≤11GHQ=GHQS≤11GHQ=GHQS≤11GHQ=GHQS≤11GHQ=
Mean±SD(741)12-36 (519)(246)12-36 (174)(246)12-36 (174)(246)12-36 (174)
Age26.23±9.0726.78±5.0024.32±3.6425.81±4.5024.86±4.1925.97±4.6229.48±14.1028.60±5.38
P value0.2120.00020.0110.436
Age at marriage20.55±2.7519.72±2.7720.40±2.6119.94±2.5620.68±2.6819.43±2.9220.56±2.9419.80±2.82
P value0.2120.00020.0110.436
Haemoglobin10.44±1.079.91±1.1310.38±1.019.94±1.2610.39±1.169.85±1.0510.56±1.049.92±1.06
P value<0.0010.0001<0.001<0.001
Mean day of IFA tablet/syrup consumed72.67±54.0762.94±49.2972.77±54.1662.94±49.291.47±0.551.45±0.57--
P value0.0610.0580.721-
Birth weight----2.83±2.782.71±2.64--
P value--0.003-

* Results of any report with the respondent no more than 3 months old as hemoglobin testing is now a routine procedure for the women of reproductive age group.

As per Table 3, the joint family showed significance as a protective factor only for mental health of pregnant women, meaning that, in India, a pregnant women is taken care of by their in-laws and that could be the reason why in this study, being in a joint family influenced good mental health for childbearing women but after the child is born women have take up tasks in the home as well as childcare. Casual employment was seen to be significant for high GHQ scores and in the total sample OR is 2.57 (1.68-3.95, <0.001) times as compared to permanently employed women. Any form of permanent employment is protective, and the results are statistically significant in the sample as a whole but not at subgroup levels. Perhaps a larger sample would be required to draw inferences.

Table 3. Multiple logistic regression application to significant socio demographic variables in the total sample and the 3 subgroups.

Socio- demographic variablesOR at 95% CI
Total women N=1260Pregnant N=420Lactating N=420NPNL N=420
Religion
Hindu1.0001.0001.0001.000
Muslim0.545 (0.35-0.57, <0.001)0.40 (0.26-0.60, <0.001)0.31 (0.20-0.47, <0.0010.71 (0.47-1.07, 0.103)
Rest of all others0.69 (0.40-1.19, 0.181)0.33 (0.11-0.97, 0.043)0.20 (0.64-0.62, 0.006)3.07 (1.21-7.77, 0.018)
Caste
ST1.001.001.001.00
SC0.42 (0.30-0.59, <0.001)0.53 (0.30-0.95, 0.34)0.40 (0.23-0.72, <0.002)0.33 (0.18-0.61, <0.001)
OBC0.35 (0.26-0.48, <0.001)0.36 (0.21-0.62, <0.001)0.31 (0.18-0.53, 0.001)0.38 (0.22-0.66, 0.001)
General0.09 (0.06-0.14, <0.001)0.12 (0.06-0.26, <0.001)0.78 (0.33-0.18, <0.001)0.07 (0.30-0.16, <0.001)
Type of family
Nuclear1.001.00
Joint0.45 (0.28-0.73, 0.001)0.38 (0.23-0.61, <0.001)
Type of employment
No1.001.001.001.00
Casual/Contractual2.57 (1.68-3.95, <0.001)2.13 (0.96-4.71, 0.062)2.99 (1.36-6.55, 0.006)2.65 (1.36-5.18, 0.004)
Permanent0.17 (0.05-0.57, 0.004)0.29 (0.34-2.53, 0.265)10.20 (0.05-0.91, 0.037)
Responder’s education
Illiterate0.39 (0.23-0.67, 0.001)0.47 (0.21-1.09, 0.078)0.28 (0.10-0.78, 0.015)0.40 (0.15-1.10, 0.076)
Primary0.20 (0.11-0.33, <0.001)0.26 (0.12-0.60, 0.001)0.13 (0.04-0.35, <0.001)0.20 (0.75-0.54, 0.002)
Secondary/Higher secondary & Above0.13 (0.06-0.26, <0.001)0.38 (0.13-1.15, 0.087)0.03 (0.01-0.17, <0.001)0.90 (0.23-0.35, 0.001)
House electrified
Yes1.001.001.00
No1.90 (1.27-2.84, 0.002)--1.002 (1.05-4.39, 0.035)1.002 (1.09-4.37, 0.027)
Toilet facility
Yes1.00--1.00--
No0.56 (0.43-0.72, <0.001)--1.001 (1.12-2.53, 0.012)--
Water inside house
Yes1.001.00
No1.92 (1.49-2.48, <0.001)--3.22 (1.97-5.27, <0.001)2.08 (1.33-3.26, 0.001)

The absence of civic amenities such as electricity in the house was significant for high GHQ and a stressor in all groups, except in pregnant women, which is perhaps because pregnant women are best supported by the family and cannot feel the stress (Blomqvist, G, & Ternald, D, 2014). Akin to the rural mindsets, the absence of toilet facilities inside the house wasn’t seen to influence women’s mental health, instead those in homes without toilets reported better GHQ 12 scores in the whole sample and only lactating women had 1.69 times high GHQ without a toilet, which was inferred to be because of the double burden of disposing of the infant’s feces. This reinforces the need for more behavior change efforts toward toilet habits in women. The absence of water inside the house was seen as a deterrent to GHQ, the highest being for lactating women i.e., 3.22 times (1.97-5.27, <0.001), which could be a result of the need for water for childcare and as in rural scenarios women usually have to fetch water.

In Table 4 certain individual characteristics were compared in the regression model. Absence of domestic violence in the last year was seen as protective and highly significant in all groups. Absence of physical or psychological violence was protective for lactating and NPNL women which was highly significant. Pregnant women show 3.02 times higher GHQ which is significant in terms of better health access and childcare while in lactating women GHQ is 6.39 times higher (2.67-15.27; p<0.001) when the access to childcare is unsatisfactory.

Table 4. Multiple logistic regression application to significant women specific and health seeking behaviour variables in the total sample and the 3 subgroups.

Characteristics (individual and health seeking behaviour)Odds ratio; 95% CI and P value
Total women N=1260Pregnant N=420Lactating N=420NPNL N=420
Episode of domestic violence in 1 year
Yes1.001.001.001.00
No0.39 (0.28-0.55, <0.001)0.55 (0.29-1.04, 0.065)0.25 (0.14-0.45, <0.001)0.46 (0.26-0.82, 0.008)
Physical violence
Yes--1.001.00
No--0.03 (0.00-0.22, 0.001)0.16 (0.05-0.53, 0.003)
Psychological violence
Yes--1.00-
No--0.57 (0.11-0.28, <0.001)-
Access to childcare
Satisfactory-1.001.00-
Unsatisfactory-1.96 (0.69-5.61, 0.208)6.39 (2.67-15.27, <0.001)-
Could be better-3.92 (1.05-14.70, 0.042)3.10 (1.66-5.81, <0.001)-
Taken 100 IFA tablets/syrup during last pregnancy
Yes--1.00-
No--3.00 (1.31-6.85, 0.009)-

Not taking IFA supplements during their current pregnancy was 3 times associated with high GHQ (1.31-6.85; p<0.009) while, interestingly, in the currently pregnant or in NPNL women, IFA consumption did not come as a significant concern for pregnant or NPNL indicating a nonchalance about this essential health intervention and this can also hint at the loose links within our health system where the IFA service delivery is taken up casually by the ground-level health workers.

The health-seeking behavior factors are seen to have some relevance only in the lactating group as giving birth makes them more conscious of their child’s and their own health. Not seeking treatment is seen to have a protective effect on women (OR 0.45; 0.31-0.70; p<0.001), which hints at the reluctance of women to seek out health care services. The protective factor could also point towards the current mandate made by the government in the state encouraging home-based care both for the infant and mother. More in-depth studies are needed to draw assertive conclusions. Going by the current trends, it is also observed in the study that an assisted or cesarean delivery is 0.42 times protective against high GHQ scores (0.24-0.72; p<0.002). Due to a lack of prerequisite care and support after a natural delivery, women especially in rural areas are shying away from this very essential natural method of delivery. The full raw data can be found under Underlying data (Kar, S, 2022).

Discussion

Odisha state boasts of 30 districts, 476 sub-districts, and 51,313 villages as per Census 2011. Female literacy continues to be 64%; and in the rural population 60.7%. Hence the study population was taken from the rural parts of the state.

High GHQ scores were noted in all the 3 subgroups i.e., antenatal, postnatal and NPNL suggesting that mental ill-health exists among all these groups and that 40% higher GHQ is also noted equally for pregnant and lactating women (41.4%) and mildly less for NPNL women (40.7%).

This indicates that there is a definite burden of mental ill-health among the women of reproductive age groups in rural areas of Odisha as the mean score of the sample was 10.45±4.48, which is very near the cutoff of 11 for normal mental health. In another study among the whole population of Somerset (Goldberg DP et al., 1997) aged 16-64 years higher GHQ scores were seen almost above 35% in all age groups among women, though there was no stratification in the study into the reproductive phases as in this study.

GHQ 12 as an instrument has been widely explored to assess early psychological distress in 32% of infertile women (Oliver MI et al., 2005, 297-301); in Polish women with Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD), wherein the mean GHQ scores varied from 13.4±6.5 to 15.5±8.0, hinting at mild distress; or in women with miscarriages (Souter VL et al., 2002; Kowalczyk R et al., 2012). The instrument has been used in British women, assessed through their reproductive cycle (Toffol E, Koponen P, Partonen T, 2013), in which predicted levels of depression do not seem to vary much among the three groups of teenage mothers, 20- something mothers, and mothers aged 30 and over, with the scores peaking 1-2 years postpartum. While the oldest group of mothers have a peak of about 0-1 years postpartum. This was a limitation in our study, as we could not follow up a woman cohort across the reproductive period, due to paucity of funds and also lack of feasibility. In our study too, all three cohorts showed the same stress and GHQ scores were mildly raised for antenatal period, contrary to studies in the West which show a rise in the post-natal period. Results were however akin to the population-based and controlled study in Britain (Liao T, 2003), which suggested that women are not more at risk of common mental health disorders during early pregnancy and postpartum than those who are not pregnant or who have not delivered recently. In this study, the NPNL strata of women too had the same risk of mental distress.

Since data was collected from 7 districts, a district level variation was also calculated that could offer suggestions to the district-level program managers of the Indian National Mental Health program to improve or intensify their efforts. Interestingly a district with poor HDI showed 77.8% of the women in the normal mental health category (Kandhamal) while a good performing district Kendrapada showed 74% of women with poor mental health. The report was shared with the district level authorities to further intensify their maternal health programmes. The mental health program personnel too can utilize this as baseline information to initiate some counseling and mental health promotive strategies to help the women. Again, the best district in HDI i.e., Khordha and the average performing district, Kandhamal, both had similar GHQ scores of 8.58±3.30 and 8.22±4.40 respectively to show that both districts had the best GHQ scores among all districts. The poorest GHQ score again was Kendrapada, which was among the good performing districts i.e., 12.91±3.27.

The study brings out demographic factors that may have a bearing on GHQ scores. This was discussed as a bivariate analysis for the sample as a whole and also for individual subgroups. Religion came out to be significant for all analyses but since the predominant proportion was Hindus, this needs a larger sample with proportionate representation from other religions. Castes such as Schedule Tribes (ST) were highly significant for high GHQs in all analyses and emerged as a pertinent finding which deserves attention at the policy level (Van Bussel JC, Spitz B, Demyttenaere K, 2006).

The logistic regression analysis has offered insight into factors that are protective as well as triggers for poor GHQ scores which imply poor mental health. Having a partner who is abusing alcohol, domestic abuse (by partner or others in the family), and education emerge as very significant factors for poor mental health and can be addressed at the program level. A similar study (De A et al., 2017) comparing mental health among rural and urban women of Odisha showed that urban women were more in distress due to spousal infidelity and alcoholism.

Mental health literacy and counseling especially among women in the reproductive age group should be made mandatory as was brought out by a study done in Maharashtra (Kermode M et al., 2010), Simple community friendly and tried tested tools like GHQ-12 could be used for this purpose with an inbuilt mechanism of counseling or added social support. In poor-resource settings such as India, such tools can be used by a paramedic or a lay community worker, who can assess for mental distress and then offer non-medical psychosocial counseling (PSY), as has been tested in Nepal (Markkula N et al., 2019) among socially disadvantaged women and yielded very good results.

Limitations

The tool cannot diagnose a mental ill-health condition. Our attempt in the study has not been to make a conclusive diagnosis but to use the opportunity of women of reproductive age group seeking health care for obstetric reasons or otherwise, to assess their mental health by an easily applicable screening tool by the ground-level workers.

Data availability

Underlying data

Harvard dataverse: Mental health status of Women in Reproductive age group and its determinants in Rural Odisha, India using GHQ 12 questionnaire. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VJEEIE (Kar, S, 2022).

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • - GHQ.xlsx

  • - Mastersheet.xlsx

Extended data

This project contains the following extended data:

  • - COMPLETE QUESTION WRA MH.pdf (Questionnaire)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Dec 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Kar S and Samantaray P. Mental health status of women in reproductive age group and its determinants in rural Odisha, India using GHQ 12 questionnaire [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1445 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124730.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 06 Dec 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.