Keywords
multiple strokes, simultaneous strokes, cause, patterns, pathogenesis, outcome
multiple strokes, simultaneous strokes, cause, patterns, pathogenesis, outcome
Simultaneous multiple intra-cerebral hemorrhages (SMICHs) are characterized by intracerebral hemorrhages within the two-or-more distinct and non-contiguous intracranial vascular territories visualized in the initial radiological imaging (Wu et al., 2017). Generally intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) connotes high odds of continuum morbidity and mortality (Laiwattana et al., 2014). Among ICH patients, approximately 5% (1:20) have been identified as SMICHs (Renard et al., 2020).
Stroke ripples affect patients with continuum multi-spectral consequences (Gokce et al., 2016). Literature scarcity pertaining to SMICH paves the way for further research on the entity. Better knowledge and in-depth information pertaining to the incidence and patterns of SMICHs can help formulate treatment algorithms as well as provide newer reforms in patient management system.
The research focused on pattern analysis on how the patients with SMICH are affected by applying age and gender as demographic variable and “hypertension” as the major risk variable.
Thus, three hypotheses were formulated:
The methodology for the research was focused to SMICH patients from the hospital medical record section of the College of Medical Sciences, in Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal, presenting between January 2019 to January 2021 (time we started recording and compiling data of patients with SMICHs). The outcomes were compiled to study the patterns through frequencies measures and analysis. The approval for the research conduction was obtained by the Institutional Review Committee (COMSTH-IRC/2021–56). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants or their next of kin (in case their poor Glasgow coma scale did not allow taking consent from the patients themselves) at the time of their admissions.
The research mainly focused upon the SMICH patients as the independent variable and how it impacts the respondents under varied dependent variables like: age, gender and hypertension.
40 patients from the College of Medical Sciences, Chitwan, Nepal with SMICH were included in this study. Data was retrieved from the medical record section of the hospital pertaining to patients presenting with SMICHs. The study size was arrived through convenience sampling.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria include:
The minimal necessary sampling for research has been estimated by Fischer’s formula (Charan & Biwas, 2013) as
Where:
a represents a value of 1.96 at the confidence-interval of 95%,
s represents SMICH prevalence as 6%,
r as 1-sand
m represents the margin-of-error as 10%.
The final result through sampling estimation was calculated as 21.66 and the sample-size of40patientswas finalized for the research purpose.
SMICH is the presence of two-or-more ICHs that affects different vascular territories with similar tomographic density-profiles. All findings were validated with radiologists.
All data was taken from patient medical records.
Etiologic classification for the cause of ICH was stratified as per the SMASH-U classification into hypertensive angiopathy, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, structural vascular abnormalities, medication related, other systemic causes, and undefined causes respectively (Mosconi et al., 2021). The risk factors were defined as:
1. Arterial hypertension if blood pressure was above 160/90 mm Hg for more than two readings at the time of admission, on antihypertensive drugs or previous medical history of hypertension.
2. Diabetes mellitus if fasting glucose level was >120 mg/dL at the time of admission; hypercholesterolemia, and fasting cholesterol level >220 mg/dL.
3. Vascular lesion with pertinent radiological imaging at the site of the ICH was classified as the primary cause of the hematoma.
4. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was diagnosed on a cerebral venogram.
5. Drug associated ICH was considered in a patient on warfarin with international normalized ratio ≥2.0, novel oral anticoagulants within three days, full-dose heparin, or on systemic thrombolysis.
6. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy was classified in patients’ ≥55 years of age with predominant lobar bleeds with microbleeds on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences sparing the basal ganglion and the thalamus.
7. Tumor associated strokes was considered among patients with proven primary lesions with a histological diagnosis following either the therapeutic hematoma evacuation or minimally invasive biopsies.
The images of the varied etiological causes of SMICH are demonstrated in the Figure 1–Figure 3.
All images are original, deidentified, and of our patients themselves.
All images are original, deidentified, and of our patients themselves.
The regression through analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing was adopted for examining the hypotheses formed as part of this research. Three hypotheses were tested and are analyzed in the following sections. The pertinent study variables of all 40 patients were retrieved and there were no missing data.
The patients’ demographics and clinico-radiological based outcomes are provided in Table 1 (Munakomi, 2022).
Among the cohort of 40 patients, the most common age group with 13(32.5%) patients was the 36–45 age group followed by 12(30%) in the 56–65 age group. The male to female gender ratio was 25:15 (62.5% vs. 37.5%).
The majority (75%) of the cohort had hypertension as the risk factor. Merely 10% of the respondents were affected by diabetes. The vast majority (97.5%) of patients lacked adherence to drug compliance. Cortical and cortical territory (60%) was the major anatomical patterns of involvement. Mortality was observed in 5 (12.5%) patients, and 14 (35%) patients left against medical advice.
Age and SMICH. Age related to SMICH was verified against the SMICH patients in the first hypothesis through the regression technique. From Table 2b, the Regression analysis (R (0.116), R2 (0.013) and Adjusted R2 (-0.012) were found; Table 2b represents that the ANOVA outcome of the age analysis is found as ‘insignificant’ (p=0.476).
The regression equation used in analyzing the association between SMICH and age in patients was calculated through:
SMICH = 3.692 + (-0.846 * AGE)
This equation is made from the beta values obtained from the above Table (2a)–Table (2c) after doing regression analysis.
Model | Sum of Squares | Difference in fraction (df) | Mean Square | Fischer (F) | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Regression | 0.698 | 1 | 0.698 | 0.519 | 0.476 |
Residual | 51.077 | 38 | 1.344 | |||
Total | 51.775 | 39 |
Model | Un-standardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | Significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta | Standard Error | Beta | |||
1 | (Constant) | 3.692 | 1.217 | 0.004 | |
SMICH | -0.846 | 1.174 | -0.116 | 0.476 |
The outcome is negative denoting that the hypothesis is invalid where age doesn’t impact the likelihood of SMICH.
Gender and SMICH. Gender was verified against the SMICH patients in the second hypothesis through the regression technique. From Table 3a, the R (0.207), R2 (0.043) and adjusted R2 (0.018) are shown; Table 3b suggests that the ANOVA outcome of the gender analysis is ‘insignificant’ (p=0.201).
Model | Sum of Squares | Difference in fraction (df) | Mean Square | Fischer test | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Regression | 0.401 | 1 | 0.401 | 1.696 | 0.201 |
Residual | 8.974 | 38 | 0.236 | |||
Total | 9.375 | 39 |
Table 3c represents the association between SMICH patients and the gender factor. Regression equation in analyzing the SMICH patients and gender association was calculated through:
Model | Un-standardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | Significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta | Standard Error | Beta | |||
1 | (Constant) | 0.718 | 0.510 | 0.168 | |
SMICH | 0.641 | 0.492 | 0.207 | 0.201 |
SMICH = 0.718 + (0.641 * GENDER)
This equation is made from the beta values obtained from the above Table (3a)–Table (3c) after doing regression analysis.
The outcome denotes that the hypothesis is invalid wherein gender doesn’t impact SMICH patients.
Hypertension and SMICH. Hypertension as a factor affecting SMICH was verified, against the SMICH patients in the first hypothesis through the regression technique. From Table 4a, the R (0.000), R2 (0.000) and Adjusted R2 (0.000) were found; Table 4b represents that the ANOVA outcome of the hypertension analysis is found as ‘significant’ (p=0.000).
Model | Sum of Squares | Difference in fraction (df) | Mean Square | Fischer test | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Regression | 0.256 | 1 | 0.256 | 1.000 | 0.000 |
Residual | 9.744 | 38 | 0.256 | |||
Total | 10.000 | 39 |
Table 4c represents the association between SMICH patients and the hypertension. Regression equation in analyzing the SMICH patients and hypertension association was calculated through:
Model | Un-standardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | Gosset’s Student distribution (T) | Significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta | Standard Error | Beta | ||||
1 | (Constant) | 2.026 | 0.532 | 3.810 | 0.000 | |
SMICH | -0.513 | 0.513 | -0.160 | -1.000 | 0.000 |
SMICH = .718 + (.641 * Hypertension)
This equation is made from the beta values obtained from the above Table (4a)–Table (4c) after doing regression analysis.
The outcome denotes that the hypothesis is valid where hypertension impacts SMICH patients.
In a study by Yen et al. (2005), the mean age of the patients presenting with SMICH was 60.6 ±7.9 years with a male:female ratio of 1.5:1.The mean age of similar cohorts in another study was 68.5 ± 12.8 years (Yamaguchi et al., 2017). Comparatively, our study saw much younger patients with 32.5% of patients in the age groups of 36–45 years. The male to female ratio in our study was 1.66:1.
Contrary to single ICH, SMICH significantly showed lobar territorial preponderance (Wu et al., 2017) (Renard et al., 2020). Our study had cortical-cortical patterns of involvement in 60% of the patients and basal ganglion and thalamic involvement in 12.5% of cases. Putamen and thalamus patterns of involvement were the most common anatomical patterns of involvement in a study by Yamaguchi et al. (2017) whereas bilateral thalamic hemorrhages variants were the most common in a study by Yen et al. (2005).
The indication of surgery among patients with SMICH depends upon variables such as presenting GCS, location and size of the hematomas (Yi et al., 2013). Surgery has been advocated among patients with lobar or cerebellar hematomas (Yen et al., 2005). In a study by Yamaguchi et al. (2017), 35.3% of patients underwent craniotomy. Surgery was performed in only 12% of our cohort.
There are variables connoting clinical outcome among patients with SMICH. One study found low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) results, large hematoma and concurrent ventricular extension to be prognostic markers determining 90-day mortality (Wu et al., 2017). Unilateral supratentorial hematomas showed the most favorable outcomes (Zaorsky et al., 2019), while deep seated SMICH had the highest mortality (Renard et al., 2020). The SMICH mortality described in the literature is high, ranging from 37% to 50% (Wu et al., 2017) (Yen et al., 2005). The mortality in our study was comparatively low at 12%. 15% of the patients in our study were referred to appropriate oncology center while 35% of them left despite medical advice.
Hypertensive angiopathy and cerebral amyloid angiopathy accounted for more than 50% of cases in SMICH (Wu TY et al.) (Renard et al., 2020) (Stemer et al., 2010). They accounted for only 42.5% of the SMICH in our study. In total, 75% of our patients presenting with SMICH had a history of hypertension and were hypertensive on presentation. Paradoxically, 97.5% of diagnosed cases of hypertension lacked compliance to their medications.
The pathophysiology of SMICH was proposed to be due to degenerative alterations in the intraparenchymal arterioles caused by long-term, uncontrolled hypertension and the simultaneous rupture of bilateral charcot-bouchard microaneurysms (Yen et al., 2005). As per the “biphasic hypothetical mechanism," an initial ictal hematoma causes an adrenaline spike that disrupts the cerebral autoregulation thereby harbingering the rupture of already weakened arterioles (Yen et al., 2005). Primary SMICH characteristically showed high microhemorrhages burden of varying age in MRI studies. This also highlights the probable role of auto-regulatory dysfunction following the ictal bleed as the prime pathological genesis behind the SMICH (Stemer et al., 2010).
This real-world incidence, patterns and outcome of SMICH can only be validated following a nation-wide multicenter database study. Due to the location and specificity of our results they may not be generalizable to patients from other ethnic and geographic backgrounds. The recall bias (about the risk factors and the medical compliance by the patients when the information was provided by their kin) can be another limiting issue in this observational study.
This is one of the first observational studies pertaining to SMICH to be carried out within our subcontinent. This study proves the need fora national stroke data bank pertaining to SMICH. This will help foster effective patient education during preoperative counseling; as well as formatting a management algorithm combating them.
Figshare: Simultaneous multiple intracerebral hemorrhages. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19063982.v2 (Munakomi, 2022).
This project contains the following underlying data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neurovascular
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: TBI
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 28 Nov 22 |
read | |
Version 1 07 Feb 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)