ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Predictors of unwillingness or inaccessibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccination among persons with disabilities in Bangladesh

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) collection.

Abstract

Introduction
Persons with disabilities (PWDs) are among the most vulnerable communities to suffer the serious consequences of COVID-19, and accepting COVID-19 vaccination is one of the recommended health advisories for them. Unwillingness to receive vaccines is a concerning issue, especially in the countries of Southeast Asia. The study aims to find out the COVID-19 vaccination rate of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Bangladesh, the rate of unwillingness or inaccessibility of vaccination for PWDs, and predict the possible reasons for unwillingness.
Methods
A descriptive cross-sectional survey of PWDs aged 12 years or more was conducted in 12 rehabilitation centers in Bangladesh between February 2022 and May 2022. A self-developed structured questionnaire on socio-demographic, disability, and health indicators, acceptance and accessibility of COVID-19 vaccines, and knowledge and attitude towards vaccination was used for the survey. The study has been conducted according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for a cross-sectional survey.
Results
With a 69% response rate, 241 PWDs participated in the study. PWDs with a spinal cord injury were the major respondents (62.7%). A total of 186 (77.2%) PWDs had taken one or more doses of COVID-19 vaccines of three doses supplied, and 55 (22.8%) were unwilling to have a vaccination. All vaccine recipients reported good accessibility to vaccination booths. The predictive factors of unwillingness were spinal cord injury type of disability (OR .36, P<.01), people coming to the rehabilitation center from rural areas (OR .44, P<.01), poor knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination (OR .78, P<.01), and dependency on mobility (OR.24, P<.001).
Conclusion
More than one-fifth of the persons with disabilities aged between 12 and 80 years were unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccination despite the accessibility of information and availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, mainly due to poor knowledge and mobility issues.

Keywords

persons with disabilities, Bangladesh, COVID-19, vaccination

Introduction

Bangladesh was targeted to cover 119,221,953 vaccine administrations for COVID-19, and the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) reports the achievement of 82.95 % at the first dose, and 72.94 % at the second dose. Nearly 36% of the population received the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.1 Since the global vaccine campaign, the World Health Organization has urged special consideration for persons with disabilities (PWDs) as a priority. According to the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), 7% of the population in Bangladesh is living with some form of disability. There are a scarcity of data about the rate of vaccine administration to PWDs in Bangladesh. Though the percentage of registered individuals for COVID-19 vaccination is approximately 94%, a population-based study reported that one-third of Bangladeshi adults had vaccine hesitancy2; these were mostly men from low-income families who were unsure regarding the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. The unwillingness to receiving vaccines was 27.4%,3 near the hesitancy margin of 33%.2 This unwillingness was found to be associated with a semi-urban dwelling, low income, and a lower educated population. No data related to the unwillingness towards COVID-19 vaccine was found in PWDs in Bangladesh; however, one study reported that 42.7% of parents of children with a neuro-developmental disability express hesitancy towards receiving the vaccine for their children.4

Unwillingness can be defined as not receiving any doses of vaccine despite there being ability to access and scope for vaccination, or not responding to the call for vaccination5, while hesitancy is doubtfulness of receiving vaccine.2 In the UK, 4% of the population was hesitant or uncertain, and another 4% were unwilling to receive the COVID-19 booster dose.5 The former study4 states that people might have poor compliance with guidelines to vaccination; this was particularly seen in vulnerable communities who were unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccination. The WHO and UNICEF policy brief states that PWDs are a part of the vulnerable community that needs to be protected through effective public vaccine campaigns. A study in the United States revealed that 25% of PWDs aged 18–65 years expressed hesitancy to receive COVID-19 vaccination.6 This hesitancy was associated with female sex, race, and education regarding the vaccine. In Bangladesh, PWDs had good knowledge, a positive attitude, and good behavioral practices in battling the COVID-19 pandemic.7 The majority of the PWDs followed health advisories during their in-patient and out-patient rehabilitation, hence it is assumed that they had access to information regarding the COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, the existing significant barriers for PWDs in Bangladesh to access healthcare, reliable information, long-term rehabilitation, social care, and support in livelihood8 were made worse by the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges faced by PWDs during the pandemic included mobility issues, physical functioning, communication barriers, an inadequate workforce, and a lack of inclusive programs in health and rehabilitation in Bangladesh.9 There are a lack of relevant data in Southeast Asia on vaccine hesitancy or unwillingness for COVID-19 vaccination for persons with disabilities, but the study in the UK5, USA6, and Bangladeshi parents of neuro-developmental disability (NDD) children7 indicate there might be a significant number of PWDs in Bangladesh hesitant and unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Besides, the parallel barriers to healthcare accessibility by PWDs in Bangladesh8,9 may contribute to the unwillingness or inaccessibility to receiving COVID-19 vaccines.

Hence the objectives of the study were to find out (1) the COVID-19 vaccination rate of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Bangladesh, (2) the rate of unwillingness and inaccessibility to vaccination for them, and (3) predict the possible reasons for unwillingness or inaccessibility.

Methods

Study design

This descriptive cross-sectional in-person survey of PWDs residing around the Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP) was carried out between February 2022 and May 2022. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for a cross-sectional survey were followed to conduct the study (Extended data 1).

Study participants and sampling technique

Any PWDs aged 12 years and more, with the ability to respond to the study questionnaire on their own or via a caregiver, was invited to participate in the study through an open call via social media, departmental notice and posters. A hospital-based randomization process was carried out from 12 service centers of CRP to enroll respondents in this in-person survey. The sample size has been calculated by Epi Info V 7.2.0 software (RRID:SCR_021682) from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) of the US, with a total PWD population of 4,480,000, and 25% the expected frequency, considering a 5% margin of error, and 1.0 design effect, a total of 288 samples could give a 95% confidence interval. We invited 396 persons with disabilities, and 241 PWDs responded to our invitation.

Questionnaire

A self-structured questionnaire was developed consisting of two parts: part I consisted of socio-demographic and clinical variables and part II contained of questions regarding acceptance of vaccination, knowledge, and attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. The outcome variables were acceptance status by either positive answers, or negative answers to the screening question “Are you vaccinated?”. The indicator of the predictors was set as knowledge on COVID-19 vaccination, with 10 score questionnaires and three categorical questions on attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination. The knowledge score was calculated by 10 questions with three possible answers: “yes”, “no”, and “don’t know”. The questions were on “awareness about COVID-19 vaccine”, “benefits of vaccine for PWDs”, “importance in health”, “source of vaccine”, “dosage of vaccines”, “adverse effect of vaccines”, “immunity through vaccine”, “efficacy of vaccine”, and “health advisory after taking vaccines” (Extended data 2). The right answers scored 1, and wrong answers or “don’t know” scored 0. The total score was obtained by the summation of individual points that ranged between 0 and 10. The people with a total score 0–3 were categorized as having poor knowledge, 4–6 good knowledge, and 7–10 excellent knowledge.

The explanatory variables were socio-demographic information such as age, gender, marital status, residential area, education, occupation, family members at home, earning members, and monthly income. Health- and disability-related information such as type of disability, method of mobility, and comorbidity was also collected. The accessibility of vaccine was screened by another open-ended question “Were there any issues regarding the accessibility of vaccine for you?” This questionnaire was developed by a group of researchers from the microbiology, public health, and epidemiology background and re-examined by a national specialist of epidemiology.

Credibility of data

The original questionnaire was developed in English and then translated into Bangla. Data were collected on the Bangla questionnaire by 15 trained data collectors who were fourth-year professional students of physiotherapy. Data entry and audit were performed by another group of students who were not involved in data collection but were trained on the questionnaire. The final dataset was screened by a statistician for consistency and data entry.

Ethical approval

Before data collection, ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (CRP/BHPI/IRB/02/2022/561) was obtained on February 1, 2022. Written informed consent was obtained from the respondents. Participants were assured about the confidentiality of data and their rights to withdraw their participation at any point in the study.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (RRID:SCR_019096) and Microsoft Excel 2016. Variables were determined as categorical or continuous data and considered either parametric or non-parametric based on data type, and normality tested through the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Shapiro–Wilk test. The descriptive statistics (Table 1) were reported as frequencies and percentages for the categorical data and measure of dispersions for interval and ratio data. Inferential statistics (Table 1) were carried out to determine the relationship between the outcome variable and predictor or explanatory variables using Chi-Square, independent t-test, or Fisher's exact test. Binary logistic regression (Table 2) was performed to find out the predictors of vaccine acceptance, considering vaccination status as a dependent variable and outcome or explanatory variables as predictor variables. The alpha level of significance was set at P< 0.05.

Table 1. Descriptive status of vaccinated and unwilling PWDs.

VariablesTotal N=241 (100%)Vaccinated N=186 (77.2%)Unwilling N=55 (22.8%)P
Socio-demographic information
Age in yearsaOverall41.21±13.35842.12±13.1238.11±13.70.207
Age in categoryc12–30 years67 (27.8%)44 (65.7%)23 (34.3%)0.046*
31–50 years119 (49.4%)96 (80.7%)23 (19.3%)
51–70 years52 (21.6%)44 (84.6%)8 (15.4%)
71–90 years3 (1.2%)2 (66.7%)1 (33.3%)
SexbMale156 (64.7%)123 (78.8%)33 (21.2%)0.403
Female85 (35.3%)63 (74.1%)22 (25.9%)
Marital statuscMarried194 (80.4%)155 (79.9%)39 (20.1%)0.096
Unmarried37 (15.4%)23 (62.2%)14 (37.8%)
Divorced2 (0.8%)2 (100%)00 (0%)
Widow8 (3.3%)6 (75%)2 (25%)
EducationbIlliterate36 (14.9%)21 (58.3%)15 (41.7%)0.001**
Primary28 (11.6%)18 (64.3%)10 (35.7%)
Secondary61 (25.3%)50 (82%)11 (18%)
HSC55 (22.8%)43 (78.2%)12 (21.8%)
Graduate51 (21.2%)45 (88.2%)6 (11.8%)
Postgraduate10 (4.1%)9 (90%)1 (10%)
OriginbRural103 (42.7%)71 (68.9%)32 (31.1%)0.009**
Semi-urban50 (20.7%)38 (76%)12 (24%)
Urban88 (36.5%)77 (87.5%)11 (12.5%)
Monthly family incomec>1000026 (10.8%)18 (69.2%)8 (30.8%)0.430
10001–50000206 (85.5%)159 (77.2%)47 (22.8%)
50000–1000004(1.7%)4(100%)
100001<5(2.1%)5(100%)
Health and disability status
ComorbidityLung diseaseb54 (22.4%)43 (79.6%)11 (20.4%)0.626
Diabetes mellitusb65 (26.6%)50 (76.9%)15 (23.1%)0.954
Hypertensionb95 (38.9%)83 (87.4%)12 (12.6%)0.002**
Genito-urinaryb60 (24.6%)46 (76.7%)14 (23.3%)0.913
Heart diseasec19 (7.8%)17 (89.5%)2 (10.5%)0.258
Epilepsyc5 (2%)3 (60%)2 (40%)0.321
COVID testbPositive6 (2.5%)5 (83.3%)1 (16.7%)1
DisabilitybSpinal cord injury151 (62.7%)127 (84.1%)24 (15.9%)0.0001***
Stroke54 (22.4%)43 (79.6%)11 (20.4%)
Amputation26 (10.8)10 (38.5%)16 (61.5%)
Others10 (4.1%)6 (60%)4 (40%)
MobilitybWheelchair162 (67.2%)139 (85.8%)23 (14.2%)0.0001***
Crutches27 (11.2%)16 (59.3%)11 (40.7%)
Walk51 (21.2%)31 (60.8%)20 (39.2%)
Long trolley1 (0.4%)1 (100%)
Vaccine-related knowledge and attitude
Knowledge regarding vaccinea0–10 score5.97±2.3146.27±2.14.95±2.40.013*
Knowledge levelbPoor knowledge40 (16.6%)23 (57.5%)17 (42.5%)0.002*
Good knowledge87 (36.1%)67 (77%)20 (23%)
Excellent knowledge114 (47.3%)96 (84.2%)18 (15.8%)
Attitude towards vaccineShould be takenc215 (89.2%)170 (79.1%)45 (20.9%)0.022*
Can protectb182 (75.5%)144 (79.1%)38 (20.9%)0.011*
Benefits PWDsb99 (41.1%)75 (75.8%)24 (24.2%)0.046*

a Independent t test,

b Chi-square test,

c Fisher's exact test significant at

* <.05,

** <.01,

*** <.001.

Table 2. Predictors of unwillingness for COVID vaccine.

Predictive factorsDependent variable (unwilling to receive COVID-19 vaccine)
NK-R2POR95% CI
Spinal cord injury0.0660.001**0.3600.194, 0.666
Rural origin0.0430.009**0.4440.241, 0.818
Poor knowledge of vaccine0.0840.001**0.7830.687, 0.893
Dependent in mobility0.1200.0001***0.2430.129, 0.456

* Significant with P<.05,

** P<.01, and

*** P<.001.

Results

Vaccination status of persons with disabilities

A total of 241 persons with disabilities responded to our invitation, giving a response rate of 69%. A total of 186 (77.2%) PWDs had received one or more doses of COVID-19 vaccines of three doses supplied, and 55 (22.8%) were unwilling to go for a vaccination. Among the vaccine receivers, 186 (77.2%) received the first dose, 168 (69.7%) received both first and second doses, and six (2.5%) received all three doses, up until May 2022. Stroke survivors had the highest median days since receiving first and second doses (257, 192) than spinal cord injury survivors (170, 131) and others (169, 132). Figure 1 shows the median days of receiving shots among the vaccinated PWDs.

96c18dd5-4124-41c1-be70-7291f5049be0_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Median days since vaccination among the persons with disabilities (PWDs).

Information about COVID-19 vaccine and accessibility

All (100%) of the persons with disabilities reported they were informed, invited, and aware of the vaccine campaigns near them, and the receivers (77.2%) stated vaccine camps were accessible to them. A total of 83% of the vaccinated individuals received the vaccine with the support of their family members, 10% were supported by a disabled people’s organization and 7% went alone to receive the vaccine. A total of 48% of the vaccinated people stated there was a separate booth for PWDs, and others said they were given special considerations.

Descriptive status of respondents

The study included 151 spinal cord injury patients (62.7%), stroke survivors (22.4%), amputation and artificial limb users (10.8%) and others (4.1%). Other disabilities included adult cerebral palsy (n=3), Guillain-Barré syndrome (n=2), congenital myopathy (n= 2), congenital spinal deformity (n=2), and blindness (n=1). The respondents’ average age was 41.21±13.358 years, and the vaccinated PWDs mean age was slightly higher than the unwilling PWDs. The highest respondents were age 31–50 years (49.4%), followed by age 12–30 years (27.8%). A total of 22.8% of the respondents were elderly, aged more than 51 years. Males were the major respondents (64.7%) compared with females (35.3%). The majority were married (80.4%), belonged to the rural and semi-urban areas (63.4%), and 85.5% of respondents had a monthly family income of more than BDT 10,000. Hypertension was the major co-morbid condition (38.9%), followed by diabetes (26.9%), lung disease (22.4%), genito-urinary problems (24.6%), and heart disease (7.8%). Six respondents had a history of being COVID positive with the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test before the vaccination. A total of 67.2% of the respondents were wheelchair users, 11.2% used a crutch, and 21.2% could walk with supervision (Table 1).

Participants were from diverse academic backgrounds: 4.1% had postgraduate degrees, 21.2% had graduation degrees, 22.8% had a higher secondary education, and 14.9% were illiterate. However, they had a mean score in vaccine-related knowledge of 5.97±2.314 in 0 to 10 scores. In addition, 16.6% had poor knowledge of vaccines (0–3 score), and 47.3% had excellent knowledge (7–10 score). A total of 89.2% had a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination, but only 41.1% believed that the vaccine could benefit persons with disabilities (Table 1).

Relationship among variables

A significant relationship (p<.05) was found between socio-demographic variables and vaccine status for age (P<.05), education (p<.01), area of origin (p<.01), disability status (p<.001), and mobility status (p<.001) (Table 1). However, the knowledge score and knowledge category regarding the COVID vaccine were also related to the status of the vaccine (p<.05). Figure 2 shows that the median knowledge score made a difference in vaccine acceptance or unwillingness to accept the vaccine. Attitudes towards COVID vaccine and belief also were related to vaccine acceptance or rejection (p<.05).

96c18dd5-4124-41c1-be70-7291f5049be0_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Knowledge score distribution according to vaccine status.

Predictors of the unwillingness for COVID-19 vaccine

Table 2 shows the predictors of unwillingness for COVID-19 vaccination. Spinal cord injury as a disability category was found to be a predictor of unwillingness to receive the vaccine (OR .36; 95% CI .19, .66; p<.01). PWDs from rural areas was also a predictor (OR .44; 95% CI .24, .81; p<.01). Other predictors were poor knowledge (OR .78; 95% CI .68, .89; p<.01), and dependency in mobility (OR.24; 95% CI.12, .45; p<.001).

Discussion

A 77.2% acceptance rate and 22.8% unwillingness rate towards COVID-19 vaccines for PWDs in Bangladesh was seen. All participants had high accessibility of vaccine-related invitations, information, and booth availability for the PWDs. The vaccination booth operators were also cooperative and accessible to the PWDs. The predictive factors of unwillingness were spinal cord injury type of disability, people coming to the rehabilitation center from rural areas, poor knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination, and dependency on mobility.

The Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP) is the only comprehensive rehabilitation center providing both in-patient and out-patient specialized rehabilitation for spinal cord injury in Bangladesh. In 2021, the center served 279 spinal cord injury in-patients for a median length of 131 days, more than 3000 musculoskeletal and neurological cases, including stroke and amputee in-patients, for a median of 21 days, more than 1000 child in-patients with a disability for a median 14 days, and covered nearly 50000 out-patient PWDs through its 12 clinical service centers. As the population was drawn from the CRP, the study had respondents with spinal cord injury as the majority (62.7%), followed by stroke, amputees, and other forms of physical disability (Table 1). The age category was eligible from 12 years, keeping the ongoing vaccine campaigns (12 years and above) as of February 202210, but the majority of respondents were youths and young adults aged between 18 and 80 years. Males were the major respondents, and only six people tested COVID positive; the profile matches CRP’s patient demographics as there was only 300 RT-PCR tests performed at CRP in the year 2021. As the majority were spinal cord injury and stroke patients, the main method of mobility (67.2%) was either wheelchairs or assistive walking devices. A study on spinal cord injury at CRP11 suggests that the tetraplegia and paraplegia ratio of spinal cord injury was 0.7: 1; 67% of the discharged spinal cord injury patients used a wheelchair for mobility, with 85% of them originating from rural areas of Bangladesh. All the predictive factors except knowledge were associated with the disease burden or mobility issues of spinal cord injury (Table 2).

One study3 examined the unwillingness of receiving COVID-19 vaccination in Bangladesh for the general population. The study found a 27.4% unwilling rate, close to our study (22.8%). The study indicated that youths and young adults (18–25 years), education category, residence category, and non-adherence to the COVID-19 test were associated with unwillingness. Our study found a significant relationship between vaccine status and age category, education, and area of origin. Another study on the parents of NDD children in Bangladesh4 had similar association of vaccine hesitancy in age groups and areas of origin, but the study concluded that parents without an RT-PCR test or vaccination were significantly hesitant about receiving a vaccine for their children with disabilities. Studies on PWDs in the USA6 associated vaccine hesitancy with young age, demographic factors, and education; they also had factors associated with types of disability and the female sex. Our study could not find any relationship between vaccination status and sex category, but it found a relationship between vaccination status and disability and mobility status (Table 2). Our study findings are related to the existing national data of Bangladeshi people6,7 and the PWDs data of the USA6. The novelty of our study was to examine the “knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine” as a predictive factor.

We examined the knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination with 10 questionnaire items prepared following the previously published studies12,13, with categorical answers “yes”, “no” or “don’t know”. The right answers scored as 1, wrong answers or “don’t know” were scored as 0. Our study had a mean score in vaccine-related knowledge of 5.97±2.314, as in category 16.6% had poor knowledge of vaccine (0–3 score), and 47.3% had excellent knowledge (7–10 score). Knowledge score was related to vaccination status (p<.05) (Table 1), and median scores were significantly different for PWDs with acceptance or unwillingness (Figure 2). The previous study suggests the level of knowledge of vaccines and sources of knowledge were factors that were indicative of the willingness to accept the vaccine.12 In addition, beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine are another factor in the Southeast Asia region.13 We found 89.2% had a positive attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination, but only 41.1% believed that the vaccine could benefit PWDs. In regression analysis, we found poor knowledge of the COVID vaccine to be predictive of the unwillingness to be vaccinated; but we did not find any associations with attitude or belief. For persons with disabilities, accessibility and availability of the COVID-19 vaccine might be a factor in receiving the vaccine, but we found accessible information about the vaccine among the respondents. The respondents were invited and aware of the vaccine campaigns near them, and the camps were accessible to them.

A total of 83% of the vaccinated individuals received the vaccine with the support of their family members, 10% were supported by a disabled people’s organization, and 7% went alone to receive the vaccine shot. In addition, 48% of the vaccinated people stated there was a separate booth for PWDs, while others said they were given special considerations. One study reveals14 that vaccination unwillingness could be predicted by the likelihood of risk, susceptibility, and severity of the disease. The respondents of our study had stable medical conditions with a variety of co-morbidities such as hypertension 38.9%, diabetes (26.9%), lung disease (22.4%), genito-urinary problems (24.6%), and heart disease (7.8%); none of these were linked to unwillingness or acceptance except hypertension (p<.05). Matched with knowledge level and rural origin, the unwilling respondents might have had no concern about their risk estimation of being out of the vaccination campaign; however, this was not evidenced by statistical calculation except support in mobility issues.

The strength of this unique study was to determine the predictive factors of the unwillingness for COVID-19 vaccination in persons with disabilities, who are vulnerable to the sequelae of COVID-19. Besides, the study examined two more important factors alongside the previous studies: knowledge, and accessibility to vaccines. The study had some limitations: respondents were clustered in an organization that was related to the rehabilitation of physical disabilities, hence other forms of disability were not accurately reflected in the study. We had a satisfactory response rate (69%) but were unable to fulfil the targeted sample size. Future studies adding the spectrum of disabilities, a larger sample size, and examining the impact of vaccination with post-COVID sequelae are recommended.

Conclusion

The study found that more than one-fifth of the persons with disabilities aged between 12 and 80 years were unwilling to receive the COVID-19 vaccination despite the accessibility of information and availability of the COVID-19 vaccine. The unwillingness was predictive of knowledge level, disability category, demography of origin, and mobility issues.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (CRP/BHPI/IRB/02/2022/561) on February 1, 2022.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the respondents. Participants were assured about the confidentiality of data and their rights to withdraw their participation at any point in the study.

Author contributions

MZH, MAH, KMAH, VR contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; MYAA, MHR, RA, SA, SJ, IKJ contributed to data curation, funding acquisition, methodology, validation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Hossain MZ, Hossain MA, Al Ansary MY et al. Predictors of unwillingness or inaccessibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccination among persons with disabilities in Bangladesh [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1564 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128506.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2022
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 31 Jan 2024
Kara B. Ayers, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
Based on my review, I have several suggestions to improve the rigor and clarity of this article on predictors of COVID-19 vaccine unwillingness among people with disabilities in Bangladesh:
Main issues:
  • The article focuses solely
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
B. Ayers K. Reviewer Report For: Predictors of unwillingness or inaccessibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccination among persons with disabilities in Bangladesh [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1564 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.141102.r226233)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Oct 2023
Sara Rotenberg, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK 
Not Approved
VIEWS 7
  • The predictors of unwillingness suggest there is a perceived or real accessibility issue by individuals who haven't been vaccinated. However, the conclusion suggests that these are not valid factors. I think this needs to be reframed not
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Rotenberg S. Reviewer Report For: Predictors of unwillingness or inaccessibility to receive the COVID-19 vaccination among persons with disabilities in Bangladesh [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:1564 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.141102.r208315)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.