Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills

Sebastian A. Medina-Ramirez; Ricardo Rojas-Humpire; Josue F. Canaza; Fiorella Hernandez; Salomón Huancahuire-Vega

doi:10.12688/f1000research.76127.1

Home Browse Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical...

ALL Metrics

Views

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved]

Sebastian A. Medina-Ramirez¹, Ricardo Rojas-Humpire², Josue F. Canaza³, Fiorella Hernandez⁴, Salomón Huancahuire-Vega ⁵

Sebastian A. Medina-Ramirez¹, Ricardo Rojas-Humpire², [...] Josue F. Canaza³, Fiorella Hernandez⁴, Salomón Huancahuire-Vega ⁵

PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2022

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Basic Sciences, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, Lima, 15, Peru
² Department of Basic Sciences, Human Medicine School, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, Lima, 15, Peru
³ P53 Research Group, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, Lima, 15, Peru
⁴ P53 Research Group, Human Medicine School, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, Lima, 15, Peru
⁵ Research General Directorate, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, Lima, 15, Peru

Sebastian A. Medina-Ramirez
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Ricardo Rojas-Humpire
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Josue F. Canaza
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Fiorella Hernandez
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Salomón Huancahuire-Vega
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: The measures taken to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, led to significant changes in university education, resulting in the new normal standard of virtual teaching in many undergraduate medical schools worldwide. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to determine the factors related to academic satisfaction with virtual teaching in medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A cross-sectional-analytical study was conducted on medical students at a private university in Peru, through self-reported questionnaires divided into sociodemographic data and variables of interest that could influence academic satisfaction during the pandemic. To evaluate possible factors related to academic satisfaction, stepwise regression models were performed for both sexes.
Results: In total, data from 310 medical students, 117 males and 193 females, were analyzed. Academic satisfaction reached a score of 11.2 ± 2.9, which was similar in both sexes. The best regression model for males (AIC: 544.32; RMSE: 2.42; R²: 0.30) showed that adaptation to university life (favorable change) and depression (unfavorable change) explained 30% of changes in students' academic satisfaction. While in females (AIC: 907.59; RMSE: 2.49; R ²: 0.22) the model integrated favorable factors such as adjustment to college life and anxiety; while depression and poor sleep quality were unfavorable factors.
Conclusion: Factors that contributed to academic satisfaction in medical students were determined in this study, which differed by gender. Thus, it is important to take into account the particularities of male and female medical students in order to improve their academic satisfaction during their university careers.

Keywords

COVID-19, Medical students, academic satisfaction, sleep, digital competencies

Corresponding author: Salomón Huancahuire-Vega

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Copyright: © 2022 Medina-Ramirez SA et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Medina-Ramirez SA, Rojas-Humpire R, Canaza JF et al. Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:241 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.1) First published: 28 Feb 2022, 11:241 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.1) Latest published: 24 Oct 2022, 11:241 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.3)

Introduction

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a pandemic. Since then, strict measures have been taken to contain the spread of the virus. Social distancing being the main one, has brought with it significant problems for education as it affects nearly 1.6 billion students worldwide.¹ This posed a substantial challenge to medical education forcing an abrupt transition to online formats.² Due to restrictions, there were limitations of access the suitable educational environments (such as laboratories, simulation rooms, and hospitals) leading to rapid transition to remote learning. As a result, there may be skills and health factors that would be impacting students' individual experience and perception of their academic environment.³ In addition, medical students, as well as other students in higher education, experience various difficulties that lead to a general feeling of dissatisfaction and frustration with online education.⁴

Academic satisfaction in academic environments through a socio-cognitive model has been highlighted in several studies due to its importance in finding external factors that could have an impact on students' overall academic satisfaction.⁵ In this model, cognitive, affective, and behavioral factors are considered due to students' perceptions of their performance contrary to other studies that focus on the subject's perception in the institutional context.⁶ Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, medical students in Peru have had no choice but to transition to remote education and it is not currently known how satisfied they are with their studies.

In addition, it is important to know the influence that the pandemic has on mental health in college students, previous studies have shown that there is an association with depression and anxiety.⁷ On the other hand, for the use of technology, the success of acquiring a good experience will depend on the learning obtained by using it, whether for academic or non-academic purposes.⁸ In the context of the pandemic, this could influence the experience of using and acquiring digital skills required for optimal learning. Factors such as mental health issues and the need to adapt to the digital environment could be contributing to perceptions of academic satisfaction.

Understanding the factors that positively or negatively influence academic satisfaction could lead us to effectively assess the problem and design targeted interventions according to the needs of a specific group of individuals classified by gender, age or socio-demographic origin. In our study we included variables previously known to have some influence on students' academic satisfaction such as adaptability to university life, digital skills, sleep quality, anxiety and depression. The aim of this work was to determine the factors related to academic satisfaction in medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Study design and population

This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in students of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Peruana Unión belonging to the first to the seventh year of studies. Students were invited to complete an online survey, in which questionnaires related to academic satisfaction, adaptation to the university, digital skills, sleep quality, stress, depression and anxiety were applied. Likewise, a virtual meeting was held for each academic year and a reminder to complete the survey was sent, which was available for 5 weeks. This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Universidad Peruana Unión before being conducted (2021-CEUPeU-0005).

Consent

Through a class briefing session per academic year, under the supervision of the academic area coordinator, all students were briefly informed of the purpose of the study and were given an average of 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire. Before completing the questionnaires, the participants who agreed to participate voluntarily gave their informed consent. Likewise, in the presentation, they were informed that the answers were confidential and that only the researchers had access to it for the purpose of this study.

Measuring questionnaires

Socio-demographic aspects were considered in order to know the general information of the participants, and to measure the variables of interest we took into account five questionnaires, which are found in their completed version in extended data, and they are detailed below:

1. Brief Scale of Satisfaction with Studies (EBSE): The EBSE is composed of 4 items, it is distributed in 2 factors: satisfaction with studies and negative affect. In this scale good internal consistency and reliability were evidenced (α=0.788). This scale reflects the satisfaction that the student has with respect to their performance and in general with their studies, distributed on a Likert scale of 5 options, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.⁶
2. Adaptability to university life: Developed by Baker and Sirik,⁹ and adapted by Rodriguez-Ayan and Sotelo. It is a questionnaire that aims to determine the degree of adaptation of students during their stay at the university. It measures 3 dimensions: social, academic and institutional. It consists of 11 items distributed on a 4-point Likert scale.¹⁰
3. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI): PSQI is a questionnaire used to measure sleep quality and its alterations in the last month.¹¹ The questionnaire consists of 19 self-assessment questions that are used to obtain the overall score. Distributed in 7 items, which are: subjective sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of medication for sleep, and daytime dysfunction. In its original version this questionnaire has an internal consistency of (α=0.83), while the adapted version in the Peruvian population showed a lower consistency but was equally valid (α=0.564) and regarding construct validity, three factors were found that explain 60.2% of the total variance.¹²
4. Digital skills: This questionnaire consists of 35 questions measured using a 5-point Likert scale. It is based on the digital skills matrix developed by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), exploring the following categories: access to information, communication and collaboration, information security, information management, media management, hardware and virtual learning environments. With respect to its psychometric characteristics, the study conducted by Avitia et al. recorded a good internal consistency (α=0.95) in general, as well as in each of its categories.¹³
5. Depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS - 21): This questionnaire consists of 21 questions measured through a Likert scale from 0 to 3 points. It is divided into 3 dimensions which separately measures depression, stress and anxiety, each being composed of 7 items. In its Spanish version it has an acceptable internal validity, for stress (α=0.82), depression (α=0.84) and anxiety (α=0.70) and shows a good interrelation between the 3 factors evaluated by this scale.¹⁴

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed in the R programming language version 4.0.2. (https://www.rstudio.com/) (RRID:SCR_001905). The variables were ordered in graphs and tables taking into account their categorical nature expressed as absolute frequency and percentage (%), or numerical as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For the comparative analysis, the χ² (chi-square) or Student's t-test was used according to the distribution of the variable. To establish the best model of factors related to academic satisfaction in medical students, stepwise regression models were performed with bidirectional elimination approach in the adjustment of independent variables, the best regression models were established based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC), root mean square error (RMSE), and R². Multivariate regression models stratified by sex were obtained with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), a value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant in the analyses.

Results

A total of 310 responses were obtained. The average age of the participants was 21.6 ± 3 years. The number of men was 117 (37.7%) and women 193 (62.3%). The total number of participants were divided into basic sciences (1^st and 2^nd academic year) and clinical sciences (3^rd to 7^th academic year), representing 42.3% and 57.7% respectively. It was found that half the participants belonged to the coastal region (52.9%), while those belonging to the highland region (21%) and those who were foreigners (20%) had similar proportion (Table 1).

Table 1. General characteristics of medical students.

Variables	Total (n=310)	Men (n=117)	Women (n=193)	p-value
Age (years)	21.6 ± 3.0	21.6 ± 3.0	21.5 ± 2.9	0.63
Year of studies (%)
First	66 (21.3)	27 (23.1)	39 (20.2)	0.983
Second	65 (21.0)	23 (19.7)	42 (21.8)
Third	49 (15.8)	18 (15.4)	31 (16.1)
Fourth	40 (12.9)	15 (12.8)	25 (13.0)
Fifth	41 (13.2)	17 (14.5)	24 (12.4)
Sixth	45 (14.5)	16 (13.7)	29 (15.0)
Seventh	4 (1.3)	1 (0.9)	3 (1.6)
Origin (%)
Coast	164 (52.9)	64 (54.7)	100 (51.8)	0.531
Highlands	65 (21.0)	25 (21.4)	40 (20.7)
Jungle	19 (6.1)	9 (7.7)	10 (5.2)
Foreign	62 (20.0)	19 (16.2)	43 (22.3)

In the assessment of emotional disorders, the presence of at least one emotional disorder was evident in more than half of the respondents. However, this differed according to sex and type of emotional disorder.

In women, 64%, 53% and 46% had stress, depression and anxiety respectively, finding that 55% (n=106) of the stressors (moderate or severe) belonged to the most worrying states. However, in men, of the 62% who had anxiety, 56% (n=66) presented the most worrying states, while 57% and 48% had depression and stress respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Distribution of emotional disorders in medical students.

A general result and comparison were made according to scores obtained in men and women for digital skills, adaptation to university life and academic satisfaction.

The results showed that, for digital skills, both sexes had a high score (87.5 ± 22.6, p=0.012), meaning a good management of digital programs or applications in general. Minimal differences in scores were found, interestingly it was statistically significant for women and men respectively in the following components: virtual environments (10 vs. 8.1, p<0.001), media management (7.7 vs. 6.9, p=0.021) and information management (15.6 vs. 14.2, p=0.007). This shows that there is a greater knowledge about the organization and use of the applications necessary for academic activities. However, this is contrary with respect to the management of search engines and access to online information, as well as a basic knowledge of information security, such as clearing history and logging out of the electronic devices they use.

On the other hand, for adaptation to university life we found an overall result of 36.9 ± 6.5 and for academic satisfaction of 11.2 ± 2.9, which did not present important differences in scores according to sex and were not statistically significant. Therefore, it is evident that they have the same perception in the new virtual teaching.

Regarding sleep quality, 83.9% (n=260) of the respondents had poor sleep quality, being the majority group in both sexes with this problem (163 women and 97 men), while only 16.1% (n=50) had good sleep quality (Table 2).

Table 2. Digital skills, adaptation to university life and academic satisfaction of medical students.

Variables	Total (n=310)	Men (n=117)	Women (n=193)	p-value
Access to information^a	19.9 ± 5.7	19.4 ± 5.4	20.7 ± 6.0	0.082
Communication and collaboration^a	21.7 ± 6.1	21.5 ± 6.2	21.9 ± 5.9	0.586
Information Security^a	10.7 ± 3.3	10.5 ± 3.2	11.0 ± 3.4	0.170
Information Management^a	14.7 ± 5.1	14.2 ± 4.9	15.6 ± 5.3	0.007*
Media Management^a	7.2 ± 2.8	6.9 ± 2.7	7.7 ± 2.9	0.021*
Hardware^a	4.4 ± 1.9	4.4 ± 1.9	4.6 ± 1.9	0.235
Virtual environments^a	8.8 ± 3.9	8.1 ± 3.7	10.0 ± 3.9	<0.001*
Digital skills^a	87.5 ± 22.6	85.1 ± 21.8	91.5 ± 23.3	0.012*
Adaptation to university life^a	36.9 ± 6.5	37.0 ± 6.2	36.7 ± 7.0	0.571
Academic Satisfaction^a	11.2 ± 2.9	11.1 ± 2.8	11.5 ± 2.9	0.170
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index^a	8.9 ± 3.3	9 ± 3.2	8.7 ± 3.3	0.337
Sleep quality (%)
Well	50 (16.1)	30 (60.0)	20 (40.0)	0.841
Bad	260 (83.9)	163 (62.9)	97 (37.1)

a Total scores.

* p<0.05, statistically significant.

Stepwise regression models and factors related to academic satisfaction

The generation of stepwise regression models to explain changes in academic satisfaction in medical students started from a factor pool of digital skills, adjustment to college life, emotional disturbance, and sleep quality for both males and females. The two-way elimination approach showed that for males the best model for academic satisfaction was at step 2 with the integration of adjustment to university life and depression (AIC: 544.32; RMSE: 2.42 and R2: 0.30), while for females the best model was at step 4 with the integration of adjustment to university life, depression, anxiety and sleep quality (AIC: 907.59; RMSE: 2.49 and R²: 0.22) (Table 3).

Table 3. Stepwise regression models of the study variables.

Variables	Addition to the model	R² adjusted	AIC	RMSE
Men
Adaptation^a	Step 1	0.244	552.64	2.52
Depression	Step 2	0.302	544.32	2.42
Women
Adaptation^a	Step 1	0.195	911.93	2.53
Depression	Step 2	0.165	917.93	2.58
Anxiety	Step 3	0.206	910.26	2.51
Sleep^b	Step 4	0.221	907.59	2.49

a Adaptation to university life.

b Quality of sleep.

The resulting multivariate models for the students revealed that in males increased adjustment to college life (x1h) and decreased depression (x2h) explained 30% of the changes in academic satisfaction (yh), yh = 6.49 + 0.16(x1h) - 0.15(x2h). On the other hand, in females adaptation to college life (x1m) and anxiety (x2m) produced positive changes in academic satisfaction, unlike depression (x3m) and decreased sleep quality (x4m), which produced negative changes in academic satisfaction (ym), ym = 10.51 + 0.08(x1m) - 0.25(x2m) + 0.13(x3m) - 0.13(x4m) (Table 4).

Table 4. Relationship of significant factors to the academic satisfaction of medical students.

Variables	Bivariate	R²	Multivariable	R²
Variables	β (95%CI)	R²	β (95%CI)	R²
Men
Adaptation^a	0.21 (0.14, 0.28)**	0.24	0.16 (0.09, 0.23)**	0.30
Depression	-0.24 (-0.33, -0.15)**	0.18	-0.15 (-0.24, -0.06)**
Women
Adaptation^a	0.13 (0.06, 0.19)**	0.07	0.08 (0.02, 0.14)*	0.22
Depression	-0.20 (-0.26, -0.14)**	0.16	-0.25 (-0.36, -0.14)**
Anxiety	-0.13 (-0.33, -0.15)**	0.05	0.13 (0.01, 0.24)*
Sleep^b	-0.22 (-0.34, -0.10)**	0.06	-0.13 (-0.24, -0.01)*

a Adjustment to university life.

b Quality of sleep.

* p<0.05.

** p<0.01 statistically significant.

Discussion

Education systems in all countries have been directly affected by the restrictions due to COVID-19, affecting about 1.57 billion students in 191 countries.¹⁵ Higher education institutions were forced to migrate to virtual means in order to continue academic activities. Pre-pandemic studies showed that distance learning in medical students could lead to an increase in knowledge, yet not be effective on academic satisfaction.¹⁶ Since student satisfaction is a way of addressing the quality of university services, knowing the factors that affect it has become vitally important for these institutions, especially under the remote modality in which they are currently being conducted. In this study, during the global pandemic contingency due to COVID-19, it was determined that the academic satisfaction of medical students of both sexes in the multivariate analysis was positively influenced by adequate adaptation to university life, and interestingly in women, by anxiety. On the other hand, poor sleep quality and depression had significant negative effects on academic satisfaction.

According to Huebner and Gilman,¹⁷ student satisfaction is a multidimensional and complex affective variable that includes students' enjoyment and evaluation of their experiences in the educational environment. It has been verified that the difficulty of adaptation to the university environment is a factor that encourages student repetition and desertion and directly affects student satisfaction.¹⁸ This study has confirmed the positive influence of adaptation to university life on academic satisfaction in both male and female medical students. Similar results were reported for first-year university students, in which it was also shown that social support networks of family and faculty members could improve academic satisfaction related to adjustment to university life.¹⁹ Additionally, it has been verified that academic adjustment positively influenced the success of Netherlands university students. This success was measured in terms of their grades, number of credits earned, and intention to stay.²⁰ In Peru, university education faces a high dropout rate; according to the government regulator, it was estimated that 27% of students who enter university studies drop out during the first year.²¹ This high dropout rate could be influenced by the difficulty of adapting to university life, which could lead to dissatisfaction and early abandonment.

Understanding and meeting students' expectations to improve their satisfaction in academic life is a challenge for universities, as students bring in multiple expectations. Efforts are needed, especially because of the potential impact of academic satisfaction on students' psychological health and well-being.²² In this study it has been verified that depression negatively influences the academic satisfaction of male and female students. Depression is an important psychological problem for university students,²³ and the exposure of medical students to depression during their university years has been previously related to their academic satisfaction.²⁴

However, due to the pandemic context, the levels of depression in medical students have increased, mainly due to the influence of isolation,²⁵ which could generate academic problems and be reflected in their satisfaction. Universities should ensure that students have access to psychosocial services to help them cope with depression, mental distress and improve students' satisfaction with their studies.

It has been documented that the prevalence of anxiety symptoms in medical students is high.²⁶ Additionally, it has been verified that the symptom of anxiety in medical students is associated with female gender and academic performance.²⁷ Many papers show that lower academic satisfaction scores are strongly associated with psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression and stress.²² Interestingly, in this study it was found that anxiety positively influences academic satisfaction in female students. In that sense, in a study with Chilean medical students it was found that those who present high levels of motivation are also more stressed and suffer greater anxiety because they want to have good results.²⁴

It has been shown that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of hours of sleep per night has varied among individuals, including students, which has been putting healthy lifestyles at risk.²⁸ In addition, previous studies have shown that most medical students sleep less than 6 hours per night,²⁹ and that sleep quality is a factor that directly affects academic performance and satisfaction with their studies.³⁰ In this sense, in this study more than 80% of the students had poor sleep quality, and this variable was strongly associated and negatively influenced the academic satisfaction in both males and females. University students, mainly in health sciences such as medicine, should receive more knowledge about sleep hygiene to improve satisfaction with their studies.

This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.³¹^,³² On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction.

In conclusion, both sexes had a good organization and management of digital programs, the factors that influenced academic satisfaction for both sexes were adaptation to the university and depression. In addition, in women it influenced the quality of sleep and anxiety. The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career.

Data availability statement

Underlying data

Figshare: “Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills” https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19113827.v2.³³

Extended data

Figshare: “Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills”

This project contains the following extended data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19119353.v4.³⁴

Reporting guidelines

STROBE checklist for “Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills” https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19113959.³⁵

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Author’s contribution

Medina-Ramirez S.A: Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; Rojas-Humpire R: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing; Canaza J.F: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing; Hernandez F: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing; Huancahuire-Vega S: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing.

References

1. Grupo de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo Sostenible: GNUDS|Informe de políticas: Educación durante COVID-19 y más allá.Reference Source
2. Rose S: Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2; 323(21): 2131–2132. Publisher Full Text
3. Khan KW, Ramzan M, Zia Y, et al.: Factors Affecting Academic Performance of Medical Students. Life Sci. 2020 Feb 13; 1(1): 4–4. Publisher Full Text
4. Watermeyer R, Crick T, Knight C, et al.: COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. High Educ (Dordr). 2020 Jun 4; 81: 623–641. Publisher Full Text
5. Lent RW: Toward a Unifying Theoretical and Practical Perspective on Well-Being and Psychosocial Adjustment. J. Couns. Psychol. 2004; 51(4): 482–509. Publisher Full Text
6. Merino-Soto C, Dominguez-Lara S, Fernández-Arata M: Validación inicial de una Escala Breve de Satisfacción con los Estudios en estudiantes universitarios de Lima. Educación Médica. 2017 Jan 1; 18(1): 74–77. Publisher Full Text
7. Pedraz-Petrozzi B, Krüger-Malpartida H, Arevalo-Flores M, et al.: Emotional Impact on Health Personnel, Medical Students, and General Population Samples During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lima. Peru. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English ed). 2021 Jul 1; 50(3): 189–198. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Ramírez Mera UN, Barragán López JF: Autopercepción de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de tecnologías digitales para el aprendizaje. Apertura (Guadalajara, Jal). 2018 Oct; 10(2): 94–109. Publisher Full Text
9. Baker RW, Siryk B: Alienation and Freshman Transition into College. J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 1980 Sep; 21(5): 437–442.
10. Rodriguez-Ayan MN, Sotelo ME: Cuestionario de adaptación a la vida universitaria (CAVU): desarrollo, estructura factorial y validación inicial. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento. 2014 Dec 10; 6(3): 40–49.
11. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al.: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May; 28(2): 193–213. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Luna Y, Robles-Arana Y: Ysela Agüero-Palacios. Validación del índice de calidad de sueño de Pittsburgh en una muestra peruana. Anales de. Salud Mental. 2015.
13. Avitia Carlos P, Ramírez IU: Evaluación de la habilidad digital de los estudiantes universitarios: estado de ingreso y potencial educativo. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa. 2017 Dec 5; 61: a366–a366. Publisher Full Text
14. Bados A, Solanas A, Andrés R: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema. 2005; 17(4): 679–683.
15. Giannini S: COVID-19 y educación superior: de los efectos inmediatos al día después. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Comparada: RELEC. 2020; 11(17): 1–57.
16. Sichani MM, Mobarakeh SR, Omid A: The effect of distance learning via SMS on academic achievement and satisfaction of medical students. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018 Feb 9; 7: 29. Publisher Full Text
17. Huebner ES, Gilman R: Students Who Like and Dislike School. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2006 Jul 1; 1(2): 139–150. Publisher Full Text
18. González LE, Uribe D: Estimaciones sobre la “repitencia” y deserción en la educación superior chilena. Consideraciones sobre sus implicaciones. Calidad en la Educación. 2002 May 30; (17): 75–90. Publisher Full Text
19. Akanni AA, Oduaran CA: Perceived social support and life satisfaction among freshmen: Mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic adjustment. J. Psychol. Afr. 2018 Mar 4; 28(2): 89–93. Publisher Full Text
20. Van Rooij ECM, Jansen EPWA, van de Grift WJCM : First-year university students’ academic success: the importance of academic adjustment. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2018 Oct 1; 33(4): 749–767. Publisher Full Text
21. Eddaif B, Boriky D, Mustapha F, et al.: Transition from High-School to University: Obstacles and Difficulties. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2017; 07: 33–37. Publisher Full Text
22. Franzen J, Jermann F, Ghisletta P, et al.: Psychological Distress and Well-Being among Students of Health Disciplines: The Importance of Academic Satisfaction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021 Feb 23; 18(4): 2151. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
23. Sahin Baltaci H, Kucuker D, Ozkilic I, et al.: Investigation of Variables Predicting Depression in College Students. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. Reference Source
24. Zugun-Eloae C, Iorga M, Gavrilescu I-M, et al.: Motivation, Stress and Satisfaction Among Medical Students. The Medical-Surgical Journal. 2016 Sep 30; 120(3): 688–693.
25. Mirhosseini S, Bazghaleh M, Basirinezhad MH, et al.: The relationship between depression and academic satisfaction in medical science students. J. Ment. Health Train. Educ. Pract. 2021; 16(2): 99–111. Publisher Full Text
26. Mirza AA, Baig M, Beyari GM, et al.: Depression and Anxiety Among Medical Students: A Brief Overview. AMEP. 2021 Apr 21; 12: 393–398. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
27. Mahroon ZA, Borgan SM, Kamel C, et al.: Factors Associated with Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Among Medical Students in Bahrain. Acad. Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1; 42(1): 31–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
28. Enriquez-Martinez OG, Martins MCT, Pereira TSS, et al.: Diet and Lifestyle Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ibero-American Countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Spain. Front. Nutr. 2021 Jun 2; 8: 257. Publisher Full Text
29. Johnson KM, Simon N, Wicks M, et al.: Amount of Sleep, Daytime Sleepiness, Hazardous Driving, and Quality of Life of Second Year Medical Students. Acad. Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1; 41(5): 669–673. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
30. Örsal Ö, Örsal Ö, Alparslan G, et al.: Evaluation of the relation between quality of sleep and anxiety among university students. HealthMED. 2012 Jan 1; 6: 2244–2255.
31. Wolniczak I, Cáceres-DelAguila JA, Palma-Ardiles G, et al.: Association between Facebook dependence and poor sleep quality: a study in a sample of undergraduate students in Peru. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e59087. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
32. Diaz-Godiño J, Fernández-Henriquez L, Peña-Pastor F, et al.: Lifestyles, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress as Risk Factors in Nursing Apprentices: A Logistic Regression Analysis of 1193 Students in Lima, Peru. J. Environ. Public Health. 2019 Nov 6; 2019: 1–7. Publisher Full Text
33. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text
34. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text
35. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2022

Author details Author details

Sebastian A. Medina-Ramirez
Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Ricardo Rojas-Humpire
Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Josue F. Canaza
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Fiorella Hernandez
Roles: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Salomón Huancahuire-Vega
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

Article Versions (3)

version 3

Revised

Published: 24 Oct 2022, 11:241

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 10 Jun 2022, 11:241

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.2

version 1

Published: 28 Feb 2022, 11:241

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.1

© 2022 Medina-Ramirez SA et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Medina-Ramirez SA, Rojas-Humpire R, Canaza JF et al. Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills [version 1; peer review: 1 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11:241 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.76127.1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2022

Views

Reviewer Report 26 Apr 2022

Oriana Rivera Lozada, South American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.80084.r127163

The article addresses a very interesting topic for medical education today, such as the topic of satisfaction in times of Covid. The document is quite clear and concrete. However, it could be improved in some aspects:

Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Methodology:

Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.
Specify sample and sampling data

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Public Health, epidemiology, infectious diseases and health education.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Author Response 10 Jun 2022

Salomon Huancahuire-Vega, Research General Directorate, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, 15, Peru

10 Jun 2022

Author Response

Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added ... Continue reading Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about Peruvian studies:
“In addition, their clinical practices were suspended as a protective measure. Under these conditions, it was determined in Peruvian health students that they had low levels of knowledge, risk perception attitudes, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19”

Methodology:
Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.

Thank you for your comment. We have added reliability information about Adaptability to university life instrument:
“Regarding its reliability evaluated by the test-retest procedure, a correlation of 0.821 was recorded, which implies a good reliability (greater than 0.8)”

Specify sample and sampling data

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about sampling data
“Participants were selected by non-probability convenience sampling”

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Thank you for your comment. In the last part of the discussion we put a paragraph with the limitations and possible biases of the study, we also commented on explanations for each of them.
“This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction”

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Thank you for your comment. Given that depression and anxiety influenced academic satisfaction, it is proposed that universities implement programs to monitor the mental health of students. These recommendations are at the end of the conclusion paragraph:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career”
Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about Peruvian studies:
“In addition, their clinical practices were suspended as a protective measure. Under these conditions, it was determined in Peruvian health students that they had low levels of knowledge, risk perception attitudes, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19”

Methodology:
Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.

Thank you for your comment. We have added reliability information about Adaptability to university life instrument:
“Regarding its reliability evaluated by the test-retest procedure, a correlation of 0.821 was recorded, which implies a good reliability (greater than 0.8)”

Specify sample and sampling data

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about sampling data
“Participants were selected by non-probability convenience sampling”

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Thank you for your comment. In the last part of the discussion we put a paragraph with the limitations and possible biases of the study, we also commented on explanations for each of them.
“This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction”

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Thank you for your comment. Given that depression and anxiety influenced academic satisfaction, it is proposed that universities implement programs to monitor the mental health of students. These recommendations are at the end of the conclusion paragraph:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career”
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern
Respond or Comment

COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT

Author Response 10 Jun 2022

Salomon Huancahuire-Vega, Research General Directorate, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, 15, Peru

10 Jun 2022

Author Response

Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added ... Continue reading Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about Peruvian studies:
“In addition, their clinical practices were suspended as a protective measure. Under these conditions, it was determined in Peruvian health students that they had low levels of knowledge, risk perception attitudes, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19”

Methodology:
Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.

Thank you for your comment. We have added reliability information about Adaptability to university life instrument:
“Regarding its reliability evaluated by the test-retest procedure, a correlation of 0.821 was recorded, which implies a good reliability (greater than 0.8)”

Specify sample and sampling data

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about sampling data
“Participants were selected by non-probability convenience sampling”

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Thank you for your comment. In the last part of the discussion we put a paragraph with the limitations and possible biases of the study, we also commented on explanations for each of them.
“This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction”

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Thank you for your comment. Given that depression and anxiety influenced academic satisfaction, it is proposed that universities implement programs to monitor the mental health of students. These recommendations are at the end of the conclusion paragraph:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career”
Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about Peruvian studies:
“In addition, their clinical practices were suspended as a protective measure. Under these conditions, it was determined in Peruvian health students that they had low levels of knowledge, risk perception attitudes, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19”

Methodology:
Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.

Thank you for your comment. We have added reliability information about Adaptability to university life instrument:
“Regarding its reliability evaluated by the test-retest procedure, a correlation of 0.821 was recorded, which implies a good reliability (greater than 0.8)”

Specify sample and sampling data

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about sampling data
“Participants were selected by non-probability convenience sampling”

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Thank you for your comment. In the last part of the discussion we put a paragraph with the limitations and possible biases of the study, we also commented on explanations for each of them.
“This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction”

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Thank you for your comment. Given that depression and anxiety influenced academic satisfaction, it is proposed that universities implement programs to monitor the mental health of students. These recommendations are at the end of the conclusion paragraph:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career”
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 28 Feb 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2
Version 3 (revision) 24 Oct 22		read
Version 2 (revision) 10 Jun 22		read
Version 1 28 Feb 22	read

Oriana Rivera Lozada, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru
Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

11 Views

25 Apr 2023 | for Version 3

Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

11 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

I would like to thank the authors for addressing all my concerns. The manuscript's quality has improved significantly after the revisions. I would suggest a language editing of the manuscript as there are issues with the manuscript's English. I have no further comments.

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Public health, medical education, internal medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

50 Views

11 Aug 2022 | for Version 2

Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

50 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Not Approved

This is an interesting study evaluating the factors associated with academic satisfaction in medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors have performed a subgroup analysis in this study. They have found that different factors are related to academic satisfaction among males and females during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is one of the strengths of this study. The findings also have practical implications in the post-COVID era. However, the methods are not explained well, and there is a need to add further details to the discussion and introduction sections.

Specific comments:

Depression, anxiety, and stress are evaluated in the present study. However, according to the title, the study was supposed to evaluate the role of emotion in academic satisfaction. As depression, anxiety, and stress are psychological issues and are not considered emotions, I would suggest changing the title accordingly. Also, please correct this issue throughout the manuscript.
I would suggest explaining the role of sleep in medical students’ life during the COVID-19 pandemic and justifying why you evaluated it in your study.
Please add more details on the study setting (e.g., location and the time study was conducted) in the methods section.
What do you mean by “non-probability” convenience sampling?
Please add your exclusion and inclusion criteria for participants in the methods section.
I would suggest explaining the basic and demographic characteristics evaluated in your questionnaire in the methods section.
Please add more details on interpreting the questionnaires’ scores (e.g., what higher or lower scores mean).
Add more details on how PSQI’s scoring system, please.
You should ensure that your variables were distributed normally before using parametric tests in your study. I would suggest performing suitable tests (e.g., the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) to determine if your variables were distributed normally. In the case of non-normal distribution, you should use non-parametric tests to compare the groups.
Add the response rate to the results section, please.
In the results section, you have categorized individuals into groups with mild to severe psychological issues. Please explain how you divided individuals into these groups and provide cut-offs in the methods section.
I would suggest rewriting the results of the regression analysis. Please simply mention the factors associated with academic satisfaction with their beta, 95% CI for beta, and P-values. Also, it is not obvious what are your references for independent variables. For example, do you mean depression score of DASS or having depression vs. not having depression.?
In the discussion section, please compare differences between males and females regarding the factors associated with academic satisfaction. Also, please compare your findings with other studies, and discuss the differences and similarities. Finally, please focus on the results of the regression analyses in your discussion. You have mentioned that sleep quality was an important factor affecting academic satisfaction in both males and females; however, sleep quality was not independently associated with academic satisfaction in males, according to your regression analysis.
I would suggest adding one or two sentences on the take-home message of this article to the conclusion section.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Public health, medical education, internal medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

04 Jan 2023

Salomon Huancahuire-Vega, Research General Directorate, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, 15, Peru

1. Depression, anxiety, and stress are evaluated in the present study. However, according to the title, the study was supposed to evaluate the role of emotion in academic satisfaction. As depression, anxiety, and stress are psychological issues and are not considered emotions, I would suggest changing the title accordingly. Also, please correct this issue throughout the manuscript.

Reply. Thank you for this suggestion. We have followed the recommendation and change the title, we have also revised and corrected the entire article:
“Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, psychological issues, college adjustment, and digital skills”

2. I would suggest explaining the role of sleep in medical students’ life during the COVID-19 pandemic and justifying why you evaluated it in your study.

Reply. Thank you for this suggestion. We have added information on the role of sleep in medical students during the pandemic in the introduction section:
“Likewise, it has been observed that the interruption of face-to-face daily activities, social isolation could affect healthy sleep, altering the times of going to bed and waking up, the appearance of sleep disorders, and promoting the development of psychological issues (stress, depression, anxiety).”

3. Please add more details on the study setting (e.g., location and the time study was conducted) in the methods section.

Reply: Thank you for your suggestion. We have added more information about the study:
“We conducted the study from last week of January, to first week of March, 2021, a virtual meeting was held for students of each academic year and each week a reminder to complete the survey was sent.”

4. What do you mean by “non-probability” convenience sampling?

Reply. Thank you for this question. We use "non-probability" because convenience sampling is a non-random, non-probability sampling technique. We recruited medical students who had access to a mobile device with internet connection and had time to complete the survey. We now this in the article:
“We used convenience sampling to enlist the students, who were invited to complete an online survey, in which questionnaires related to academic satisfaction, adaptation to the university, digital skills, sleep quality, stress, depression and anxiety were applied.”

5. Please add your exclusion and inclusion criteria for participants in the methods section.

Reply. Thank you for your comment. We have added information about inclusion/exclusion criteria in the methods section:
“Inclusion criteria were: 1) Students enrolled during the 2021 academic cycle, 2) who have not completed another health career. Students who didn't give their informed consent or didn't complete the survey were excluded from the study.”

6. I would suggest explaining the basic and demographic characteristics evaluated in your questionnaire in the methods section.

Reply. Thank you for your comment. We have added more information about socio demographic characteristics in the methods section:
“Socio-demographic aspects were considered, such as year of study, country of origin, place of residence, in order to know the general information of the participants…”

7. Please add more details on interpreting the questionnaires’ scores (e.g., what higher or lower scores mean).

Reply. Thank you for your recommendation: Information on the interpretation of each questionnaire’s score has been added.

8. Add more details on how PSQI’s scoring system, please.

Reply. Thanks for your comment. We have added more details about PSQI’s scoring system in the methods section:
“The questionnaire consists of 9 self-assessment questions, 4 subjective (questions 1-4) and 5 objective (questions 5-9) questions, that are used to obtain the global score. These questions are distributed in 7 components, which are: subjective sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of medication for sleep, and daytime dysfunction. Each component, have instructions to sum the score of the subjective and objective questions. High scores (Global score >5) indicate poor sleep quality.”

9. You should ensure that your variables were distributed normally before using parametric tests in your study. I would suggest performing suitable tests (e.g., the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) to determine if your variables were distributed normally. In the case of non-normal distribution, you should use non-parametric tests to compare the groups.

Reply. Thanks for your comment. In the exploratory analysis we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, then we use a non-parametric test (U de Mann Whitney) for comparative analysis. We have added this specification in the data analysis section:
“Data analysis was performed in the R programming language version 4.0.2. (https://www.rstudio.com/) (RRID:SCR_001905). The variables were ordered in graphs and tables taking into account their categorical nature expressed as absolute frequency and percentage (%), or numerical as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For the comparative analysis, the χ 2 (chi-square) or Mann Whitney U test was used according to the non-normal distribution of the variable evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To establish the best model of factors related to academic satisfaction in medical students, stepwise regression models were performed with bidirectional elimination approach in the adjustment of independent variables. The best regression models were established based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC), root mean square error (RMSE), and R². Multivariate regression models stratified by sex were obtained with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant in the analyses.

10. Add the response rate to the results section, please.

Reply. Thank you for your comment. We have added the response rate in the results section:
“A total of 310 responses were obtained (rate of responses of 70%).”

11. In the results section, you have categorized individuals into groups with mild to severe psychological issues. Please explain how you divided individuals into these groups and provide cut-offs in the methods section.

Reply. Thank you for your comment, you are right. We have added the cut-offs of stress, depression, and anxiety in the method section:
“According to the score obtained in the specific psychological issue it is classified as mild (anxiety: 4, stress: 8-9, depression: 5-6), moderate (anxiety: 5-7, stress: 10-12, depression: 7-10), severe (anxiety: 8-9, stress: 13-16, depression: 11-13) and extremely severe (anxiety ≥ 10, stress ≥ 17, depression ≥ 14). In its Spanish version it has an acceptable internal validity, for stress (α=0.82), depression (α=0.84) and anxiety (α=0.70). and shows a good interrelation between the 3 factors evaluated by this scale. ¹⁵”

12. I would suggest rewriting the results of the regression analysis. Please simply mention the factors associated with academic satisfaction with their beta, 95% CI for beta, and P-values. Also, it is not obvious what are your references for independent variables. For example, do you mean depression score of DASS or having depression vs. not having depression.?

Reply. Thank you for your suggestion. We have rewrite the section “Stepwise regression models and factors related to academic satisfaction”:
“Multivariate models in males showed that a higher score in adaptation (β: 0.16, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.23, p<0.01) and a lower score of depression (β: -0.15, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.06, p<0.01) were related to increased student satisfaction and explain 30% of the changes in the adjusted model. On the other hand, in females a higher score of adaptation (β: 0.08, CI 95% 0.02 to 0.14, p<0.01) and anxiety (β: 0.13, CI95% 0.01 to 0.24, p<0.01), while, a lower score in depression (β: -0. 25, 95%CI -0.36 to -0.14, p<0.01) and sleep quality (β: -0.13, 95%CI -0.24 to -0.01, p<0.01) were related to academic satisfaction. Overall, the model for women explained that 22% of changes in academic satisfaction.”

13. In the discusión section, please compare differences between males and females regarding the factors associated with academic satisfaction. Also, please compare your findings with other studies, and discuss the differences and similarities. Finally, please focus on the results of the regression analyses in your discussion. You have mentioned that sleep quality was an important factor affecting academic satisfaction in both males and females; however, sleep quality was not independently associated with academic satisfaction in males, according to your regression análisis.

Reply. Thank you for your comment. We have focused the discussion on the regression analysis and we have added comments about differences between males and females regarding to anxiety and sleep quality. By the other hand, you are right about sleep quality as factor affecting academic satisfaction only in females. We have corrected the discussion this aspect:
“For example, a study conducted among medical students showed a significant gender difference with twice the rate of anxiety among women compared to men (SECOND NEW REFERENCE ADDED). Another study shows that the highest rates of anxiety in female students occur in the first years of study (THIRD NEW REFERENCE ADDED). To explain the difference in anxiety levels between male and female students, it has been verified that female Chinese university students had higher levels of anxiety than males and these anxiety levels were associated with their body image, alcohol consumption habits and academic performance (FOURTH NEW REFERENCE ADDED).”
“Additionally, one study highlighted the top three student concerns associated with anxiety: academic performance, pressure to succeed, and post-graduation plans (FIFTH NEW REFERENCE ADDED). More studies are required to determine the factors related to mental problems such as anxiety that influence the academic achievement of medical students.”
“During the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been verified that compared to men, women reported lower quality and efficiency of sleep and greater symptoms of insomnia (SIXTH NEW REFERENCE ADDED). This difference is probably due to women being more concerned about their family's health and the risk of exposure to the coronavirus (SEVENTH NEW REFERENCE ADDED). The gender difference seems to play a role in influencing sleep quality and satisfaction with studies in medicine students. This difference should be taken into account when planning educational interventions for medical students on the importance of proper sleep hygiene and the consequences of poor sleep practices. Additionally, university students, mainly in health sciences such as medicine, should receive more knowledge about sleep hygiene to improve satisfaction with their studies.”
“On the other hand, in both males and females, depression had significant negative effects on academic satisfaction and in relation to poor sleep quality, interestingly, it only affected females.”
“In this sense, in this study more than 80% of the students had poor sleep quality, and this variable was strongly associated and negatively influenced the academic satisfaction in female students.”

14. I would suggest adding one or two sentences on the take-home message of this article to the conclusion section.

Reply. Thank you for your comment. We have added take-home messages in the conclusion section:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health and to educate medical students about the importance of proper sleep hygiene. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career.”

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

61 Views

26 Apr 2022 | for Version 1

Oriana Rivera Lozada, South American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru

61 Views Cite this report Responses(1)

Approved

Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.
Specify sample and sampling data

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Public Health, epidemiology, infectious diseases and health education.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (1)

Author Response

10 Jun 2022

Salomon Huancahuire-Vega, Research General Directorate, Peruvian Union University (UPeU), Lima, 15, Peru

Introduction:
It is well structured, however, it can be strengthened with information from Peruvian studies that have been carried out (background).

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about Peruvian studies:
“In addition, their clinical practices were suspended as a protective measure. Under these conditions, it was determined in Peruvian health students that they had low levels of knowledge, risk perception attitudes, and preventive practices regarding COVID-19”

Methodology:
Add the reliability data of the instrument Adaptability to university life.

Thank you for your comment. We have added reliability information about Adaptability to university life instrument:
“Regarding its reliability evaluated by the test-retest procedure, a correlation of 0.821 was recorded, which implies a good reliability (greater than 0.8)”

Specify sample and sampling data

Thank you for your comment. We have added information about sampling data
“Participants were selected by non-probability convenience sampling”

Results and Discussion:
Add the biases of the study and what they did to control them. The discussion should strengthen with preferably national background.

Thank you for your comment. In the last part of the discussion we put a paragraph with the limitations and possible biases of the study, we also commented on explanations for each of them.
“This study had some limitations. The majority of medical students who responded to the survey were from the first years with a predominance of women and it was conducted in a single university center. However, there was participation of students from different regions of Peru including a considerable participation of students residing abroad. Additionally, there were no cut-off scores for most of the questionnaires used, however, most of these questionnaires have been previously used in the Latino population.On the other hand, we did not consider other specific factors by academic year, which could influence academic satisfaction, such as academic demand or clinical courses, because of which we could cover most common factors among medical students. However, future studies should consider these limitations and include these factors to have a better understanding of the outcome of academic satisfaction. Despite these limitations it is important to highlight the use of stepwise regression in uni- and multivariate models for the determination of the influence of each factor on academic satisfaction”

Specify some interventions that can be proposed based on this research.

Thank you for your comment. Given that depression and anxiety influenced academic satisfaction, it is proposed that universities implement programs to monitor the mental health of students. These recommendations are at the end of the conclusion paragraph:
“The factors found in this study can suggest universities to implement programs to have a good mental health. In addition, this may help teachers to develop plans and strategies for adaptation to the university, in this way they could improve the academic satisfaction of medical students during their university career”

View more View less

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

[1] 1. Grupo de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo Sostenible: GNUDS|Informe de políticas: Educación durante COVID-19 y más allá.Reference Source

[2] 2. Rose S: Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2; 323(21): 2131–2132. Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Khan KW, Ramzan M, Zia Y, et al.: Factors Affecting Academic Performance of Medical Students. Life Sci. 2020 Feb 13; 1(1): 4–4. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Watermeyer R, Crick T, Knight C, et al.: COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. High Educ (Dordr). 2020 Jun 4; 81: 623–641. Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Lent RW: Toward a Unifying Theoretical and Practical Perspective on Well-Being and Psychosocial Adjustment. J. Couns. Psychol. 2004; 51(4): 482–509. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Merino-Soto C, Dominguez-Lara S, Fernández-Arata M: Validación inicial de una Escala Breve de Satisfacción con los Estudios en estudiantes universitarios de Lima. Educación Médica. 2017 Jan 1; 18(1): 74–77. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Pedraz-Petrozzi B, Krüger-Malpartida H, Arevalo-Flores M, et al.: Emotional Impact on Health Personnel, Medical Students, and General Population Samples During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lima. Peru. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English ed). 2021 Jul 1; 50(3): 189–198. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Ramírez Mera UN, Barragán López JF: Autopercepción de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de tecnologías digitales para el aprendizaje. Apertura (Guadalajara, Jal). 2018 Oct; 10(2): 94–109. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Baker RW, Siryk B: Alienation and Freshman Transition into College. J. Coll. Stud. Pers. 1980 Sep; 21(5): 437–442.

[10] 10. Rodriguez-Ayan MN, Sotelo ME: Cuestionario de adaptación a la vida universitaria (CAVU): desarrollo, estructura factorial y validación inicial. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento. 2014 Dec 10; 6(3): 40–49.

[11] 11. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al.: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May; 28(2): 193–213. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Luna Y, Robles-Arana Y: Ysela Agüero-Palacios. Validación del índice de calidad de sueño de Pittsburgh en una muestra peruana. Anales de. Salud Mental. 2015.

[13] 13. Avitia Carlos P, Ramírez IU: Evaluación de la habilidad digital de los estudiantes universitarios: estado de ingreso y potencial educativo. Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa. 2017 Dec 5; 61: a366–a366. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Bados A, Solanas A, Andrés R: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema. 2005; 17(4): 679–683.

[15] 15. Giannini S: COVID-19 y educación superior: de los efectos inmediatos al día después. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Comparada: RELEC. 2020; 11(17): 1–57.

[16] 16. Sichani MM, Mobarakeh SR, Omid A: The effect of distance learning via SMS on academic achievement and satisfaction of medical students. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018 Feb 9; 7: 29. Publisher Full Text

[17] 17. Huebner ES, Gilman R: Students Who Like and Dislike School. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2006 Jul 1; 1(2): 139–150. Publisher Full Text

[18] 18. González LE, Uribe D: Estimaciones sobre la “repitencia” y deserción en la educación superior chilena. Consideraciones sobre sus implicaciones. Calidad en la Educación. 2002 May 30; (17): 75–90. Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Akanni AA, Oduaran CA: Perceived social support and life satisfaction among freshmen: Mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic adjustment. J. Psychol. Afr. 2018 Mar 4; 28(2): 89–93. Publisher Full Text

[20] 20. Van Rooij ECM, Jansen EPWA, van de Grift WJCM : First-year university students’ academic success: the importance of academic adjustment. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2018 Oct 1; 33(4): 749–767. Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Eddaif B, Boriky D, Mustapha F, et al.: Transition from High-School to University: Obstacles and Difficulties. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2017; 07: 33–37. Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Franzen J, Jermann F, Ghisletta P, et al.: Psychological Distress and Well-Being among Students of Health Disciplines: The Importance of Academic Satisfaction. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021 Feb 23; 18(4): 2151. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Sahin Baltaci H, Kucuker D, Ozkilic I, et al.: Investigation of Variables Predicting Depression in College Students. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. Reference Source

[24] 24. Zugun-Eloae C, Iorga M, Gavrilescu I-M, et al.: Motivation, Stress and Satisfaction Among Medical Students. The Medical-Surgical Journal. 2016 Sep 30; 120(3): 688–693.

[25] 25. Mirhosseini S, Bazghaleh M, Basirinezhad MH, et al.: The relationship between depression and academic satisfaction in medical science students. J. Ment. Health Train. Educ. Pract. 2021; 16(2): 99–111. Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Mirza AA, Baig M, Beyari GM, et al.: Depression and Anxiety Among Medical Students: A Brief Overview. AMEP. 2021 Apr 21; 12: 393–398. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Mahroon ZA, Borgan SM, Kamel C, et al.: Factors Associated with Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Among Medical Students in Bahrain. Acad. Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1; 42(1): 31–40. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Enriquez-Martinez OG, Martins MCT, Pereira TSS, et al.: Diet and Lifestyle Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ibero-American Countries: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Spain. Front. Nutr. 2021 Jun 2; 8: 257. Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Johnson KM, Simon N, Wicks M, et al.: Amount of Sleep, Daytime Sleepiness, Hazardous Driving, and Quality of Life of Second Year Medical Students. Acad. Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1; 41(5): 669–673. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Örsal Ö, Örsal Ö, Alparslan G, et al.: Evaluation of the relation between quality of sleep and anxiety among university students. HealthMED. 2012 Jan 1; 6: 2244–2255.

[31] 31. Wolniczak I, Cáceres-DelAguila JA, Palma-Ardiles G, et al.: Association between Facebook dependence and poor sleep quality: a study in a sample of undergraduate students in Peru. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e59087. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. Diaz-Godiño J, Fernández-Henriquez L, Peña-Pastor F, et al.: Lifestyles, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress as Risk Factors in Nursing Apprentices: A Logistic Regression Analysis of 1193 Students in Lima, Peru. J. Environ. Public Health. 2019 Nov 6; 2019: 1–7. Publisher Full Text

[33] 33. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text

[35] 35. Medina-Ramirez S: Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills. figshare. Dataset. 2022. Publisher Full Text

Online academic satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in medical students: role of sleep, emotions, college adjustment, and digital skills

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study design and population

Consent

Measuring questionnaires

Data analysis

Results

Table 1. General characteristics of medical students.

Figure 1. Distribution of emotional disorders in medical students.

Table 2. Digital skills, adaptation to university life and academic satisfaction of medical students.

Stepwise regression models and factors related to academic satisfaction

Table 3. Stepwise regression models of the study variables.

Table 4. Relationship of significant factors to the academic satisfaction of medical students.

Discussion

Data availability statement

Underlying data

Extended data

Reporting guidelines

Author’s contribution

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated