Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Poovitha Shruthi P; Obhuli Chandran M; Baskaran Chandrasekaran; Vaishali K.; Suresh Sukumar; Rajagopal Kadavigere

doi:10.12688/f1000research.110911.3

Home Browse Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Revised

Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

[version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 not approved]

Poovitha Shruthi P¹, Obhuli Chandran M², Baskaran Chandrasekaran³, Vaishali K.⁴, Suresh Sukumar², Rajagopal Kadavigere ⁵

Poovitha Shruthi P¹, Obhuli Chandran M², [...] Baskaran Chandrasekaran³, Vaishali K.⁴, Suresh Sukumar², Rajagopal Kadavigere ⁵

PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2025

Author details Author details

¹ Division of Yoga, Center for Integrative Medicine and Research Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, karnataka, 576104, India
² Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, manipal, karnataka, 576104, India
³ Department of Exercise and Sports Sciences, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
⁴ Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
⁵ Department Radio diagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

Poovitha Shruthi P
Roles: Investigation, Methodology

Obhuli Chandran M
Roles: Conceptualization

Baskaran Chandrasekaran
Roles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Vaishali K.
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology

Suresh Sukumar
Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Rajagopal Kadavigere
Roles: Supervision

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background

Alteration in the central vascular hemodynamics is speculated to influence cognitive functions, including executive functions in young adults. Prolonged sitting is associated with compromised central vascular functions, which activity micro-breaks could mitigate. However, the association between the carotid vascular hemodynamic alteration and the executive functions is yet to be explored.

Methods

We administered a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of various intensities' micro-breaks on central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions for four hours. The carotid artery hemodynamics and cognitive functions were measured by Duplex ultrasound at 0^th, 2^nd and 4^th hour and computer-based Flanker tests at 0^th, 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd and 4^th hour of visit days, respectively. From the randomised controlled trial, we extracted the secondary data of carotid artery hemodynamics and cognitive functions change at the 4^th hour from the baseline and analysed for any relation.

Results

Though we observed linear relation between the carotid artery hemodynamics and the executive functions, the relation was not statistically significant. we found a significant reduction in carotid artery diameter during prolonged sitting (0.03 cm [95%CI 0.01, 0.05]), velocity (10.35 cm/s [95%CI -2.85, 17.86]) and shear rate during interrupted sitting (174.39 [95%CI 65.67, 283.11]) We found increased accuracy during prolonged sitting (12.7% [95%CI 0.66, 24.81]) and sitting with light-intensity activity breaks (6.92% [95%CI 1.39, 12.44]). We did not find any significant relation between the change in central vascular functions (carotid artery diameter, velocity, shear rate and blood flow) and the cognitive functions during three different work conditions.

Conclusion

Though a significant relation between carotid artery function and cognitive function could not be established, microbreaks can mitigate the vascular and cognitive risks associated with prolonged sitting.

Keywords

Prolonged sitting, Central vascular function, Blood flow, Velocity, Doppler, Micro-breaks, Cognition

Corresponding author: Rajagopal Kadavigere

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: Baskaran Chandrasekaran received a faculty seed grant from Manipal Academy of Higher Education for the present research.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2025 Shruthi P P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite: Shruthi P P, Chandran M O, Chandrasekaran B et al. Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:397 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.3) First published: 06 Apr 2022, 11:397 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.1) Latest published: 29 Jan 2025, 11:397 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.3)

Revised Amendments from Version 2

The additional references are added as suggested by the reviewer.

To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.

1. Introduction

Profound dynamic changes in the endothelial functions in early adulthood is associated with early atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease risk in late adulthood.¹^–³ High sedentary behavior (sitting activities with low energy expenditure less than 1.5 metabolic equivalents) is now identified to be the independent risk factor for the early atherogenesis and cardio-metabolic disease risk.⁴^,⁵ However, high sedentary behavior is evident and continue to rise globally and in contextual settings such as workplace and schools.⁶^–⁸ Hence it is imperative to address contextual sedentary behavior through administering movement based micro-breaks.⁹^,¹⁰ Empirical evidence elucidating the efficacy of advocating activity breaks during the prolonged sitting time on cardiometabolic disease risk and cognitive decline remains mixed.¹¹^–¹³

Mechanistic plausible mechanisms have linked central vascular functions and resulting cortical perfusion to cognitive functions such as memory, attention, visuospatial skills and cognitive control.¹⁰^,¹⁴^,¹⁵ Executive functions and working memory influences common work-related skills: decision making and problem-solving, resulting in better work productivity.¹⁶^,¹⁷ The alteration in the vascular function and the resulting cognitive functions are viewed as plausible mechanistic links to poor problem-solving skills and low work productivity.¹⁸^–²⁰ Few epidemiological evidence and acute laboratory studies have attempted to elucidate the above possible association between vascular endothelial functions, cognitive functions, and work productivity however, it remains inconclusive.²¹^–²³

We attempted to explore the possible association between the central vascular functions and the executive functions in simulated sedentary and active work conditions. We hypothesised that the subtle association between central vascular functions and executive functions may foster occupational health experts to design appropriate public health and behavioral strategies to culminate the adverse effects of work conditions on central vascular and cognitive functions, which may improve work productivity.

2. Methods

The present findings are the results of the secondary analysis of our ongoing randomised controlled trial. Kasturba Hospitals Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC 383-2021) approved the study and was prospectively registered in India's Clinical Registry (CTRI/2021/09/036496). The study was conducted and conforms to the research principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.²⁴

2.1 Study design

The findings of the study are derived from a randomized crossover trial that investigates the effects of passive and active work conditions on central vascular functions and cognitive control in young adults.

The study was conducted in the ultrasound testing room, department of radiodiagnosis and imaging of a multidisciplinary teaching hospital. The study was conducted between September 2021 – December 2021. Potential participants were randomised to one sedentary and two active work conditions for four hours, with each study visit was separated by a wash-out period of at least six days. The whole study design is depicted in Figure 1. The present study explored the relation between the dynamic carotid vascular changes (diameter, velocity, shear rate and blood flow) and executive functions. We explored the possible association of cognitive functions and the dynamic carotid artery functions with the lifestyle factors such as physical activity, smoking, alcoholism and body composition.

Figure 1. Design of the present study.

The participants were randomised to the three different behavioral interventions in simulated work conditions for four hours: (1) SIT (uninterrupted sitting for four hours with bathroom breaks only); (2) LIT (sitting interrupted with light intensity walking breaks for three minutes every one hour for four hours of the study period; MIT (sitting interrupted moderate-intensity stair climbing breaks for three minutes every one hour for four hours of the study period). Doppler ultrasound-mediated carotid, superficial femoral artery diameter and velocity were measured every two hours of each visit period, and computer-based executive functions were measured every hour of each visit period.

2.2 Participants

Young adults of age 25 – 35 years of both genders belonging to a single university were invited to the study through the official Exchange student emails, brochures in college and hostel noticeboards. Due to cultural barriers for Doppler ultrasound measurement, only male students volunteered for the study. To be eligible, the potential participants should be physically inactive (self-reported physical activity levels of less than 600 METmin/week International Physical Activity Questionnaire IPAQ), optimum levels of visual acuity (> 5/6) for operating the computer-based cognitive tests with adequate lower limb strength to walk or climb stairs for three minutes. Participants with self-reported cardiometabolic diseases, recent musculoskeletal trauma < three weeks or self-reported depressive disorders affecting physical activity or cognitive measurement were excluded from the study. Further, the volunteers willing to dedicate at least six weekday hours were included in the study.

2.3 Measures

2.3.1 Vascular functions

The vascular functions using Doppler ultrasound was measured as stated and administered in the earlier studies.⁹^,²⁵^–³⁰ Dynamic central (right carotid artery) and peripheral vascular (Superficial Femoral Artery) functions [diameter, velocity] were measured using Duplex ultrasound (GE Voluson Swift, Germany) at a pulsed frequency of 50 MHz using the probe insonated at an angle of 60° were used. The diameter and the velocity were automatically measured using inbuilt edge-detection software, and the captured images were analysed using B Mode images and confirmed with the carotid artery’s diameter and velocity. Shear rate was calculated using the formula: 4 × [mean blood velocity/arterial diameter]. The maximal blood flow was calculated from continuous diameter and mean blood velocity recordings using the following equation: 3.14*(diameter/2)² * mean blood velocity *60.³¹

2.3.2 Executive functions

Executive functions or cognitive control was assessed using the computer-based Response Inhibition test, Eriksen Flanker paradigm (Milliseconds, Inquist). The participants were presented with the visual stimuli on a laptop using Inquist 6.0 software (Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA, USA).

The participants were shown a line with five alphabets H, K, S &C with the central alphabet as the target and flankers on the sides. The participants were instructed to focus on the central alphabet and press either Q or P based on the H or K, and S or C displayed on the left and right sides of the computer screen, respectively. The task had two types of trials: congruent (noise) and incongruent (no noise) trials. All the alphabets are the same in congruent trials, while the flanker and target alphabets were different in the incongruent trials. A total of 120 trials (60 congruent, 60 incongruent) were presented to the participants, which were randomly sampled. Each trial lasted for 3000 ms, with an interstimulus interval of 1500 ms. The participants were given a one min break after every 40 trials. The data were automatically stored in the inquisit software and retrieved as csv files later for analysis.

2.4 ‘Snack’ivity interventions

We administered activity interruptions during sitting at two different intensities: (1) Light Intensity Task (LIT): The participants were asked to walk in the 30-meter laboratory hallway at their comfortable pace (perceived exertion less than 11 in original Borg’s scale) for three minutes every hour during this intervention visit; (2) Moderate Intensity Task (MIT): The participants were asked to climb laboratory stairs of 20 cm with a self-selected stepping rate (perceived exertion of 13-15 corresponding to in original Borg’s scale) for three minutes every hour during this intervention visit.

2.5 Procedure

In the present study, the participants had visited the laboratory four times, of which one was a familiarisation session, and the other three were interventional visits. On the first study visit, the participants were familiarised with the standardised procedures of vascular and executive functions measurement along with the familiarisation of hallway walk (LIT) and stair climbing (MIT). Further, the intervention order (SIT, LIT and MIT) was randomised using computer randomisation (www.randomiser.org). The participants were asked to pick the concealed envelopes of the random generated treatment orders, and the order was followed for the subsequent visits. On the second visit, the patient arrived between 8:00 AM-9:00 AM to reduce the effect of the diurnal variation on the vascular and cognitive function. The patients were instructed to refrain from smoking, alcohol and any vigorous activity for at least 48 hours prior to the second, third and fourth study visits. The potential participants were given an asleep food diary log and ensured adequate sleep for at least 8 hours, and the previous dinner was at least separated by 12 hours from the study visit. The participants were transported from their location to the lab by means of the motor vehicle to avoid any vigorous activity during the travel. After baseline vascular and cognitive measures, the participants were given a standard breakfast (idly with dhal kichadi on participants preference) which ensured 33% of the daily calorie consumption based on the food log during the familiarisation visit. The study visits, including measurement and interventions, took place in the temperature and humidity-controlled laboratory (26°C and 84% humidity).

Based on the order of the randomisation, the participants underwent SIT or LIT or MIT interventions. During the SIT intervention visit, the participants were instructed to perform their day work (read, write or watch non-stimulant videos of their preference) for the next four hours (9:00 – 1:00 PM) in the uninterrupted sitting position with minimal lower limb movements. If the participant wished to use the bathroom in the middle of the study visit, the participants were passively transferred to the western toilet using a wheelchair. A researcher monitored and ensured to avoid the unpurposeful movements in the participants during all three study visits. The participants followed a similar work simulation during LIT intervention, except they interrupted their sitting time by self-paced walking for three minutes every hour in the laboratory hallway. During the MIT intervention visit day, the participants interrupted their sitting time by three minutes of stair climbing every one hour at a self-selected stair climbing velocity. The participants were instructed to select a climbing velocity that may induce a moderate-intensity effort (exertion level of 13 and above).

The central (right common carotid artery) and peripheral (right superficial femoral artery) vascular functions were measured at baseline, 2^nd hour, and 4^th hour, whereas the computer-based executive functions were measured every one hour (0^th, 1^st, 2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th hour).

2.6 Data analysis

The present study results are part of secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. We have presented the baseline demographics, cerebral vascular and cognitive functions as mean and standard deviation after log-transformed the non-normal data. The normalisation was assessed using the Shapiro Wilk test, and in the case of non-normality, the variables were log-transformed. The change in the central vascular and executive functions before and after 4 hours of the three study visits was calculated using excel 2016. The mean change in the central vascular and executive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline using paired t-tests and effect size using Cohen d. The relation between the mean change in the central vascular functions (diameter, velocity and shear rate) and the executive functions (reaction times and accuracy) before and after four hours were analysed using the Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression model with the executive function as the dependant variables and the covariates as central vascular function controlling for baseline demographic variables. All the statistical treatments were analysed using statistical software JASP version 0.14.0 (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands).

2.6.1 Power calculation

As the presented data is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, the presented sample size was also calculated for the randomised controlled trial. For the randomised controlled trial, we have estimated our sample size as 14 participants to have at least a difference in blood flow velocity of 0.45 ml/min with the moderate effect (Cohen d = 0.45) between the SIT and LIT interventions at 95% level of significance and 80% power. With an assumed drop of 20% of the sample for the three study visits, we have included 17 participants. The sample size was calculated using a software program (G*Power version 3.1.9.6, Universitat Kiel, Germany).³²

3. Results

Seventeen males volunteered for the study, and all of them completed all three study visits that were six-seven days apart. Only male participants participated in the study as the females were reluctant for the lower limb vascular function study. Of 22 participants volunteered for the study, 17 participants were found to be eligible due to potential reasons displayed in Figure 2. All the 17 participants completed the 4 day experimental visits with no missing data. Figure 2 shows the inclusion of the participants and the secondary data extracted from the cross over trial.

Figure 2. Flowchart showing the screening, inclusion of the participants and the secondary analysis of the data extracted from the randomised cross over trial.

3.1 Baseline characteristics

The majority of the participants (n = 16; 94%) had a normal BMI, whereas one volunteer was found to be obese with a mean BMI of 24.88 ± 3.50. Many of the participants (n = 10; 55.85%) were found to have at least one lifestyle risk factor, such as smoking or alcohol. The majority of the participants (n = 14; 82.35%) were found to be physically inactive. We did not find any significant differences among the carotid artery variables or executive function variables during all the active and passive work conditions from baseline except the reaction times. Table 1 demonstrates the baseline characteristics (demographic, central vascular and executive functions) of the included study participants.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the participants.

Variables		Mean ± SD	n (%)	Significance (p*)
Age		24.41 ± 3.84
Body Mass Index		24.88 ± 3.50
Waist circumference (cm)		97.32 ± 6.31
Education	Undergraduate		5 (29.41)
Education	Postgraduate		12 (70.58)
Experience (> one year)			11 (64.71)
Smoking (yes)			8 (47.06)
Alcohol (yes)			11 (64.71)
Endothelial functions
Carotid artery diameter (cm)	SIT	0.638 ± 0.075		0.176
	LIT	0.650 ± 0.080
	MIT	0.604 ± 0.064
Carotid artery velocity (cm/s)	SIT	120.76 ± 16.97		0.380
	LIT	118.07 ± 12.51
	MIT	125.00 ± 13.66
Carotid artery shear stress	SIT	1541.65 ± 348.05		0.170
	LIT	1479.46 ± 281.54
	MIT	1682.17 ± 314.62
Carotid artery blood flow	SIT	2327.68 ± 582.49		0.461
	LIT	2371.96 ± 626.86
	MIT	2148.70 ± 416.37
Executive functions
Reaction times (ms)	SIT	474.45 ± 115.80		<0.001**
	LIT	547.56 ± 68.33
	MIT	601.61 ± 75.93
Accuracy (%)	SIT	77.18 ± 15.94		0.101
	LIT	85.51 ± 6.61
	MIT	78.86 ± 10.88

* Differences among SIT, LIT, MIT variables are assessed using analysis of variance.

** p = 0.001.

3.2 Change in central vascular endothelial functions and the executive functions within the conditions:

When the central vascular functions and cognitive functions change were compared at the fourth hour with the baseline, we found a significant reduction in carotid artery diameter during SIT (0.03 cm [95%CI 0.01, 0.05], Cohen’s d = 0.677), velocity (10.35 cm/s [95%CI -2.85, 17.86], Cohen’s d = 0.709) and shear rate during MIT (174.39 [95%CI 65.67, 283.11], Cohen’s d = 0.825), reaction times during MIT (54.10 ms [95%CI 15.06, 93.22], Cohen’s d = 0.8712), accuracy during SIT (12.7% [95%CI 0.66, 24.81], Cohen’s d = 0.542) and LIT (6.92% [95%CI 1.39, 12.44], Cohen’s d = 0.644). However we found a significant increase in carotid artery shear stress during SIT (-129.30 [95%CI -255.61, -2.98], Cohen’s d = -0.526 and accuracy during MIT conditions (-3% [95%CI -7.38, 2.03], Cohen’s d = -0.292). We did not find significant variation in other central vascular and executive function variables among three different working conditions. Table 2 illustrates the mean change of the cognitive and central vascular functions at the fourth hour from the baseline among the three different working conditions of SIT, LIT and MIT.

Table 2. Change in central vascular endothelial functions and the executive functions within the conditions.

Variables	Interventions
	SIT			LIT			MIT
	T₀	T₄	T₀ - T₄^¶	T₀	T₄	T₀ - T₄^¶	T₀	T₄	T₀ - T₄^¶
Central vascular functions
Carotid artery diameter (cm)	0.64±0.08	0.61±0.07	0.03±0.01**	0.65±0.08	0.63±0.08	0.02±0.01	0.60±0.06	0.62±0.07	-0.01±0.01
Carotid artery velocity (cm/s)	120.76±16.97	125.92±18.71	-5.17±3.85	118.07±12.51	123.18±15.06	-5.11±3.24	125±13.66	114.65±19.09	10.35±3.54**
Carotid artery shear rate (/s)	1541.65±348.05	1670.94±332.68	-129.30±59.58*	1479.46±281.54	1588.62±275.31	-109.16±69.42	1682.17±314.62	1507.78±352.15	174.39±51.29**
Carotid artery blood flow	2337.68±582.49	2239.51±651.90	88.17±99.51	2371.96±626.86	2325.88 ±644.57	46.08±63.47	2148.70.±416.37	2086.40 ±609.60	62.31±122.49
Executive functions
Reaction times (ms)	474.45±115.80	377.03±255.84	97.42±60.30	547.56±68.33	519.582±99.92	27.98±23.76	601.61±75.93	547.47±74.60	54.14±18.44**
Accuracy (%)	77.18±15.94	64.44 ±17.79	12.74±5.70*	85.51±6.16	78.59±13.89	6.92±2.61*	78.86±10.88	81.54±10.21	-2.67±2.22

¶ = values calculated from the paired t test,

* = p < 0.05,

** = p < 0.01, * &** - denotes level of significance.

3.3 Correlation among changes in central vascular functions and the cognitive functions

We did not find any significant relation between the change in central vascular functions (carotid artery diameter, velocity, shear rate and blood flow) and the cognitive functions during three different work conditions. Table 3 revealed no significant correlation among the central vascular and cognitive functions change between the 0^th hour and 4^th hour during different work postures. Multiple linear regression also revealed no significant association between the change central vascular and cognitive functions within the conditions (Figure 3A, 3B and 3C)

Table 3. Correlation among changes in central vascular functions and the cognitive functions.

Central vascular functions		Executive functions
		Reaction times (ms)			Accuracy (%)
		SIT	LIT	MIT	SIT	LIT	MIT
Diameter (cm)	SIT	0.101 (0.699)			0.015 (0.953)
	LIT		0.162 (0.534)			0.062 (0.812)
	MIT			0.069 (0.793)			-0.102 (0.704)
Velocity (cm/s)	SIT	-0.265 (0.303)			-0.350 (0.169)
	LIT		-0.051 (0.847			0.095 (0.718)
	MIT			0.038 (0.886)			0.248 (0.337)
Shear rate (/s)	SIT	-0.255 (0.324)			-0.271 (0.292)
	LIT		-0.056 (0.83)			0.064 (0.808)
	MIT			0.005 (0.986)			0.277 (0.282)
Blood flow	SIT	-0.127 (0.627)			-0.244 (0.345)
	LIT		0.111 (0.67)			0.102 (0.708)
	MIT			0.093 (0.722)			0.046 (0.861)

Figure 3A. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during SIT intervention.

Though changes in reaction times and accuracy were found to be associated positively with change in carotid artery diameter (a, d), carotid artery velocity (b, e) and negatively associated with change in carotid artery shear rate (c, f ), the associations were not statistically significant.

Figure 3B. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during LIT intervention.

Though changes in reaction times and accuracy were found to be associated positively with change in carotid artery diameter (a, d), carotid artery shear rate (c, f ) and negatively associated with change in carotid artery velocity (b, e), the associations were not statistically significant.

Figure 3C. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during MIT intervention.

Though accuracy was found to be associated negatively with change in carotid artery diameter (d), carotid artery shear rate (f ) and positively associated with change in carotid artery velocity (e), the associations were not statistically significant. We observed non-linear and non-significant relation between reaction times and the central vascular functions (a, b, c) when compared 0^th and 4^th hour within conditions.

4. Discussion

Our present study aimed to investigate whether the change in the central vascular functions is associated with any change in the executive functions during the different active and passive work conditions. We found no significant relation exists between the change in carotid artery endothelial functions and the cognitive functions during the work conditions with or without interruption between varied intensities of physical activities.

Altered central vascular hemodynamics, especially carotid artery stiffness and sclerosis, is a long recognised risk for cognitive decline in the elderly.³³^,³⁴ Epidemiological studies have observed plausible mechanistic links for the altered carotid artery hemodynamics and cognition: narrowing of carotid artery due to atherosclerotic plaques and low shear stress reducing the bioavailability of nitric oxide and the prostaglandins, which in turn reduces the cortical perfusion to frontal, temporal, limbic systems and increased risk of cognitive and neurodegenerative disorders such as stroke and dementia.³⁵^,³⁶ Though the existing evidence has confirmed the positive association between central vascular functions and cognitive decline in the elderly, the association remains uncertain in young adults. As central vascular hemodynamic changes occur at an early, relatively younger age, the problem should be addressed at a younger age to mitigate the cognitive decline at an older age. However, our study failed to find a positive relation between the central vascular and cognitive functions in the young adults, probably due to homogeneity in the baseline characteristics (age, gender, diet and physical activity) with the simulated work conditions with or without physical activity interventions. Our study findings are contrary with the existing observational studies that have established the linear relation between the cognitive impairment and central vascular diameters³⁷ flow velocity,³⁵^,³⁸ shear stress³⁹ and blood flow. The findings of non-significant relation between the central vascular functions and the executive functions in our study probably due to the less age, gender bias, the nature of the working conditions (low stimulus, boredom) and unstandardized tasks not relevant to the participants routine work.²⁸^,⁴⁰ Further evidence to explore the association between cognitive functions and central vascular functions is warranted.

We found a 4.68% reduction in the carotid artery diameter after four hours of uninterrupted sitting. Our study findings concur with the recent experimental trials that have observed the reduction in central and peripheral artery diameter, reactivity and stiffness with uninterrupted sitting.²⁸^,³⁰^,⁴¹ Further, our findings demonstrated an 8.68% increased shear stress in the carotid artery after four hours of prolonged sitting which is contrary to the existing hypothesis that prolonged sitting reduces stroke volume and increased shear stress in central and peripheral vasculature.³¹^,⁴¹^–⁴⁴ Nevertheless, our findings concurs with the previous findings that prolonged sitting reduces the accuracy by 13%, whereas interrupting sedentary time with three minutes of stair climbing (MIT) every hour may improve accuracy by 3%. Even light-intensity walk breaks (LIT) could not mitigate the risk of inaccuracy associated with prolonged sitting. We could find a significant reduction (8-10%) in the carotid artery velocity and shear rate and reaction times when the prolonged sitting was with stair climbing (MIT). Our findings add to the existing evidence that demonstrated the short term effects of interrupting prolonged sitting to improve central vascular and cognitive functions.²⁵^,²⁸^,⁴⁵^–⁴⁷ However, we could not appreciate the association between central vascular and cognitive functions changes during various working postures and conditions.

4.1 Limitations

(1) Our findings are retrieved as a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial, and the sample size was based on the same. The readers should interpret the findings with caution due to the low sample and poor causal effect⁴⁸; (2) Our study findings did not adapt postural changes (sitting to supine) for vascular function measurements, unlike earlier studies which might have influenced the results. We wanted to extrapolate the findings to the real-world work environment, and hence we have not altered the assigned position (sitting) during the carotid artery measurement⁴⁹; (3) we have included only males for the convenience in central and peripheral vascular functions that inherently introduced a gender bias in our study.⁴⁹^,⁵⁰ Future studies should investigate the vascular effects of interrupting sitting among both genders for real-world generalisation.

To conclude, our study found no association between the change in the central vascular and cognitive functions during sitting with or without interruption. The negative effects in central vascular and cognitive functions associated with uninterrupted sitting can be well mitigated by a brief period of stair climbing hourly.

Data availability

Underlying data

Harvard Dataverse. Alteration in carotid artery physiology and cognitive function during simulated work conditions in males. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IP33PI.⁵¹

This project contains the following underlying data:

- Alteration in the central vascular hemodynamics is speculated to influence cognitive functions, including executive functions in young adults. Prolonged sitting is associated with compromised central vascular functions, which activity micro-breaks could mitigate. However, the association between the carotid vascular hemodynamic alteration and the executive functions is yet to be explored. We administered a randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of various intensities' micro-breaks on central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions for four hours. The carotid artery hemodynamics and cognitive functions were measured by Duplex ultrasound at 0th, 2nd and 4th hour and computer-based Flanker tests at 0th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th hour of visit days, respectively. From the randomised controlled trial, we extracted the secondary data of carotid artery hemodynamics and cognitive functions change at the 4th hour from the baseline and analysed for any relation. Though we observed linear relation between the carotid artery hemodynamics and the executive functions, the relation was not statistically significant. we found a significant reduction in carotid artery diameter during prolonged sitting (0.03 cm [95%CI 0.01, 0.05]), velocity (10.35 cm/s [95%CI -2.85, 17.86]) and shear rate during interrupted sitting (174.39 [95%CI 65.67, 283.11]) We found increased accuracy during prolonged sitting (12.7% [95%CI 0.66, 24.81]) and sitting with light-intensity activity breaks (6.92% [95%CI 1.39, 12.44]). Though a significant relation between carotid artery function and cognitive function could not be established, micro-breaks can mitigate the vascular and cognitive risks associated with prolonged sitting.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC BY 4.0 Public domain dedication).

References

1. Gooding HC, Gidding SS, Moran AE, et al.: Challenges and Opportunities for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease Among Young Adults: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(19): e016115. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
2. Urbina EM, Kimball TR, Khoury PR, et al.: Increased arterial stiffness is found in adolescents with obesity or obesity-related type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Hypertens. 2010; 28(8): 1692–1698. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
3. Urbina EM, Dolan LM, McCoy CE, et al.: Relationship between elevated arterial stiffness and increased left ventricular mass in adolescents and young adults. J. Pediatr. 2011; 158(5): 715–721. Publisher Full Text
4. Park JH, Moon JH, Kim HJ, et al.: Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2020; 41(6): 365–373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
5. Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Dunstan DW, et al.: Sitting Less and Moving More: Implications for Hypertension. Hypertension. 2018; 72(5): 1037–1046. Publisher Full Text
6. Mclaughlin M, Atkin AJ, Starr L, et al.: Worldwide surveillance of self-reported sitting time: a scoping review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020; 17(1): 111. Publisher Full Text
7. Medina C, Jáuregui A, Hernández C, et al.: Physical inactivity and sitting time prevalence and trends in Mexican adults. Results from three national surveys. PLoS One. 2021; 16(7): e0253137. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
8. Tulasiram B, Chandrasekaran B: Are Smartphones Better in Guiding Physical Activity Among Sedentary Young Adults? A Randomised Controlled Trial. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 11(1): 83–91. Publisher Full Text
9. Carter SE, Draijer R, Holder SM, et al.: Regular walking breaks prevent the decline in cerebral blood flow associated with prolonged sitting. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018; 125(3): 790–798. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
10. Chandrasekaran B, Pesola AJ, Rao CR, et al.: Does breaking up prolonged sitting improve cognitive functions in sedentary adults? A mapping review and hypothesis formulation on the potential physiological mechanisms. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021; 22(1): 274. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Loh R, Stamatakis E, Folkerts D, et al.: Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Physical Activity Breaks on Blood Glucose, Insulin and Triacylglycerol Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020; 50(2): 295–330. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
12. Hadgraft NT, Winkler E, Climie RE, et al.: Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021; 55(3): 144–154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
13. Zongpa TC, Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A: Effectiveness of A Smartphone Directed Physical Activity Program on Cardiometabolic Disease Risk in Desk-Based Office Employees – A Pragmatic, Two-Arm, Parallel, Cluster Randomised Trial. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 10(4): 713–723. Publisher Full Text
14. Maasakkers CM, Melis RJF, Kessels RPC, et al.: The short-term effects of sedentary behaviour on cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive performance in older adults: a cross-over design on the potential impact of mental and/or physical activity. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2020; 12(1): 76. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
15. Fouda AY, Fagan SC, Ergul A: Brain Vasculature and Cognition. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019; 39(4): 593–602. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Cristi-Montero C, Hernandez-Jaña S, Zavala-Crichton JP, et al.: Mentally active but not inactive sedentary behaviors are positively related to adolescents’ cognitive-academic achievements, a cross-sectional study — The Cogni-Action Project. Ment. Health Phys. Act [Internet]. 2023; 25: 100561. Publisher Full Text Reference Source
17. Nooijen CFJ, Blom V, Ekblom Ö, et al.: Improving office workers’ mental health and cognition: a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in multi-component interventions. BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar; 19(1):266. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
18. Malek-Ahmadi M, Duff K, Chen K, et al.: Volumetric regional MRI and neuropsychological predictors of motor task variability in cognitively unimpaired, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and probable Alzheimer’s disease older adults. Exp. Gerontol [Internet]. 2023; 173: 112087. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source
19. Chueh TY, Chen YC, Hung TM: Acute effect of breaking up prolonged sitting on cognition: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar; 12(3): e050458. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
20. Watts P, Hayee Shahid M, Bertotti M, et al.: Social, cognitive, behavioural and neighbourhood characteristics associated with sedentary time in men and women living in deprived neighbourhoods. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017 Aug; 17(7):904–912. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Labonté-LeMoyne E, Jutras MA, Léger PM, et al.: Does Reducing Sedentarity With Standing Desks Hinder Cognitive Performance? Hum. Factors. 2020 Jun; 62(4):603–612. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
22. Panahi S, Tremblay A: Sedentariness and Health: Is Sedentary Behavior More Than Just Physical Inactivity? Front. Public Health. 2018; 6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
23. Clark M, DiBenedetti D, Perez V: Cognitive dysfunction and work productivity in major depressive disorder. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 2016; 16(4): 455–463. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
24. Association WM: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191–2194. Publisher Full Text
25. Carter SE, Gladwell VF: Effect of breaking up sedentary time with callisthenics on endothelial function. J. Sports Sci. 2017; 35(15): 1508–1514. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
26. Thosar SS, Bielko SL, Mather KJ, et al.: Effect of prolonged sitting and breaks in sitting time on endothelial function. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015; 47(4): 843–849. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
27. Peddie MC, Kessell C, Bergen T, et al.: The effects of prolonged sitting, prolonged standing, and activity breaks on vascular function, and postprandial glucose and insulin responses: A randomised crossover trial. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1 January 2021): e0244841. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
28. Stoner L, Barone Gibbs B, Meyer ML, et al.: A Primer on Repeated Sitting Exposure and the Cardiovascular System: Considerations for Study Design, Analysis, Interpretation, and Translation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021; 8: 716938. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
29. Stoner L, Willey Q, Evans WS, et al.: Effects of acute prolonged sitting on cerebral perfusion and executive function in young adults: A randomized cross-over trial. Psychophysiology. 56(12): e13457. Publisher Full Text
30. Paterson C, Fryer S, Zieff G, et al.: The Effects of Acute Exposure to Prolonged Sitting, With and Without Interruption, on Vascular Function Among Adults: A Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020; 50(11): 1929–1942. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
31. Morishima T, Restaino RM, Walsh LK, et al.: Prior exercise and standing as strategies to circumvent sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction. Clin. Sci. (Lond.). 2017; 131(11): 1045–1053. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
32. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods. 2009; 41(4): 1149–1160. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
33. Dempsey RJ, Vemuganti R, Varghese T, Hermann BP: A review of carotid atherosclerosis and vascular cognitive decline: a new understanding of the keys to symptomology. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(2): 484–494. discussion 93-4. Publisher Full Text
34. Azharuddin S, Rao CR, Chandrasekaran B, et al.: Effects of prolonged sitting interventions on chronic low-grade inflammation in adults: A protocol for a systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 11(4): 614–627. Publisher Full Text
35. Marshall RS, Pavol MA, Cheung YK, et al.: Cognitive Impairment Correlates Linearly with Mean Flow Velocity by Transcranial Doppler below a Definable Threshold. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra. 2020; 10(1): 21–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
36. Marshall RS, Asllani I, Pavol MA, et al.: Altered cerebral hemodyamics and cortical thinning in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12): e0189727. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
37. Gutierrez J, Kulick E, Park Moon Y, et al.: Brain Arterial Diameters and Cognitive Performance: The Northern Manhattan Study. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2018; 24(4): 335–346. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
38. Elias MF, Torres RV, Davey A: Carotid Artery Blood Flow Velocities and Cognitive Performance: Forecasting Cognitive Decline. Am. J. Hypertens. 2019; 32(3): 237–239. Publisher Full Text
39. Zhang H, Liu H, Dong Y, et al.: Low carotid wall shear stress independently accelerates the progression of cognitive impairment and white matter lesions in the elderly. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(13): 11402–11413. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
40. Credeur DP, Miller SM, Jones R, et al.: Impact of Prolonged Sitting on Peripheral and Central Vascular Health. Am. J. Cardiol. 2019; 123(2): 260–266. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
41. McManus AM, Ainslie PN, Green DJ, et al.: Impact of prolonged sitting on vascular function in young girls. Exp. Physiol. 2015; 100(11): 1379–1387. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
42. Restaino RM, Walsh LK, Morishima T, et al.: Endothelial dysfunction following prolonged sitting is mediated by a reduction in shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016; 310(5): H648–H653. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
43. Restaino RM, Holwerda SW, Credeur DP, et al.: Impact of prolonged sitting on lower and upper limb micro- and macrovascular dilator function. Exp. Physiol. 2015; 100(7): 829–838. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
44. Morishima T, Restaino RM, Walsh LK, et al.: Prolonged sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction is prevented by fidgeting. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016; 311(1): H177–H182. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
45. Wennberg P, Boraxbekk CJ, Wheeler M, et al.: Acute effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on fatigue and cognition: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(2): e009630. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
46. Carter SE, Draijer R, Holder SM, et al.: Effect of different walking break strategies on superficial femoral artery endothelial function. Physiol. Rep. 2019; 7(16): e14190. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
47. Gibbs BB, Kowalsky RJ, Perdomo SJ, et al.: Effect of alternating standing and sitting on blood pressure and pulse wave velocity during a simulated workday in adults with overweight/obesity. J. Hypertens. 2017; 35(12): 2411–2418. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
48. Ziyatdinov A, Kim J, Prokopenko D, et al.: Estimating the effective sample size in association studies of quantitative traits. G3 (Bethesda). 2021; 11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
49. Patel K, Rössler A, Lackner HK, et al.: Effect of postural changes on cardiovascular parameters across gender. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(28): e4149. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
50. Levenson J, Pessana F, Gariepy J, et al.: Gender differences in wall shear-mediated brachial artery vasoconstriction and vasodilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001; 38(6): 1668–1674. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
51. Sukumar S: Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial.2022. Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:I8KqlavhS35wrCHVTOZjrQ== [fileUNF].Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 06 Apr 2022

Author details Author details

¹ Division of Yoga, Center for Integrative Medicine and Research Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, karnataka, 576104, India
² Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, manipal, karnataka, 576104, India
³ Department of Exercise and Sports Sciences, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
⁴ Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India
⁵ Department Radio diagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

Poovitha Shruthi P
Roles: Investigation, Methodology

Obhuli Chandran M
Roles: Conceptualization

Baskaran Chandrasekaran
Roles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

Vaishali K.
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology

Suresh Sukumar
Roles: Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Rajagopal Kadavigere
Roles: Supervision

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

Baskaran Chandrasekaran received a faculty seed grant from Manipal Academy of Higher Education for the present research.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (3)

version 3

Revised

Published: 29 Jan 2025, 11:397

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.3

version 2

Revised

Published: 22 Apr 2022, 11:397

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.2

version 1

Published: 06 Apr 2022, 11:397

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.1

Copyright

© 2025 Shruthi P P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Shruthi P P, Chandran M O, Chandrasekaran B et al. Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 not approved]. F1000Research 2025, 11:397 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110911.3)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 3

VERSION 3

PUBLISHED 29 Jan 2025

Revised

Views

1

Reviewer Report 05 Mar 2025

Kevin S Heffernan, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176784.r367162

This study examined the effect of interrupted sitting breaks on carotid hemodynamics and executive function. Overall, there were minimal changes in carotid hemodynamics and executive function with prolonged sitting with small effects of LIT and MIT. Overall, this is an ... Continue reading

This study examined the effect of interrupted sitting breaks on carotid hemodynamics and executive function. Overall, there were minimal changes in carotid hemodynamics and executive function with prolonged sitting with small effects of LIT and MIT. Overall, this is an interesting and somewhat well-designed study to examine the effect of LIT and MIT on carotid hemodynamics and executive function. Unfortunately, designing a study that does not address cultural barriers necessary to include women is a fatal study design flaw. This study should be re-done and designed in a culturally sensitive way to include both biological sexes. Also, as designed, this study cannot test the proposed study hypothesis. The narrative can be improved to improve overall readability and clarity. Below are additional specific comments.

General Comments
Abstract methods. Can you please operationally define carotid hemodynamics and what specifically was measured? Please also include information on sample (biologic sex, age) and sample size. Can you also offer more insight into study design? How many visits, what were the various “intensities” for the micro-breaks? As prepared, it is not clear what was done, what was measured, and who completed the tasks.

Abstract results. Please correct “We” sentence 2.

Based on the results presented in the abstract, the conclusion is not a logical extension. For example, authors state that there was increased accuracy with prolonged sitting. How, then, could microbreaks mitigate cognitive risks if there are no cognitive declines? Please consider revising conclusions to better align with study results.

Introduction. Last sentence, paragraph 1. Please contextualize the mixed findings. Briefly describe what was found according to the literature.

Introduction. Paragraph 2, sentence 1. Please revise “Mechanistic plausible mechanisms…” is redundant.

Paragraph 2. Please operationalize central vascular functions. What is meant by this term? Additionally, almost all of the references cited do not relate to studies on vascular function and cognitive function. There are now numerous studies that have examined the effect of sitting on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, carotid stiffness, cerebral hemodynamics etc and a few that have examined microbreaks and exercise snacks. Almost all references cited in paragraph 2 are review papers and not primary sources. The authors are encouraged to improve the rigor of the literature that this study draws upon.

Introduction Paragraph 3. Please clearly operationally define central vascular functions. Specifically, what will be measured and why?

The study design is not designed to test the study hypothesis. Please consider either revising the hypothesis to better match the study or develop a new study that is designed to test the hypothesis.

Please confirm that all participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Study design, paragraph 2, last sentence. If this is a study purpose, then this should be included in the introduction.

The femoral artery is not a central artery. Moreover, lower limb blood flow is not mentioned in the introduction or study purpose (or results or discussion). Please clarify why this measure is being done and better integrate this measure into the paper.

“Due to cultural barriers…” is not clear. If this study was not designed to be culturally sensitive to ensure the inclusion of both men and women, that is a fatal study design flaw.

Based on study design, why not use a repeated measures analysis of variance and test for condition by time interactions?

Executive function was assessed 4 times for each condition. Please comment on the choice to focus on the 4^th hour measures. Justify this in the methods section.

Section 3.1. BMI. Please spell out abbreviations first time being used. How was height and weight measured to calculate BMI? This information is not provided in the methods.

Section 3.2. is difficult to navigate. Please pull the results apart. Focus on changes within a condition and then between conditions. Focus on one variable at a time.

The abstract states that there was an increase in accuracy with SIT, but table 2 shows a reduction (although the calculated change score is positive). Please clarify.

Table 2 is confusing. For example, if accuracy changed from 77 to 64, why is the change score shown as being positive? This obfuscates results.

The figures largely replicate the findings presented in Table 3 and are not needed.

The results for femoral artery measures are not presented.

Discussion paragraph 1. The authors conclude on carotid endothelial functions, but this was not specifically measured.

The final conclusion is challenging to interpret. This largely stems from conflicting reports of the effect of SIT on accuracy. The abstract states that accuracy increased, but the table shows a decrease (albeit the change score is listed as a positive change).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Vascular physiology, exercise physiology, effect of vascular function on cognitive function

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

8

Reviewer Report 03 Feb 2025

Watson Arulsingh D.R, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.176784.r363365

The author's response to the reviewer's ... Continue reading

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Version 2

VERSION 2

PUBLISHED 22 Apr 2022

Revised

Views

23

Reviewer Report 16 Nov 2023

Watson Arulsingh D.R, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.129988.r206855

Introduction

To reframe the following sentence
However, high sedentary behavior is evident and continue to rise globally and in contextual settings such as workplace and schools.

Add reference for the following sentences
... Continue reading

Introduction

To reframe the following sentence
However, high sedentary behavior is evident and continue to rise globally and in contextual settings such as workplace and schools.

Add reference for the following sentences
Executive functions and working memory influences common work-related skills: decision making and problem-solving, resulting in better work productivity. The alteration in the vascular function and the resulting cognitive functions are viewed as plausible mechanistic links to poor problem-solving skills and low work productivity.

Add suitable references for the following statement
Few epidemiological evidence and acute laboratory studies have attempted to elucidate the above possible association between vascular endothelial functions, cognitive functions, and work productivity however, it remains inconclusive

Define executive function:

Study design
Please re- frame the following sentence
The findings presented in the study is based on the results of a randomized cross over the trial,

2.2 Participants
How did you administer the procedure mentioned below?
To be eligible, the potential participants should be physically inactive (self-reported physical activity levels of less than 600 METmin/week)

Discussion
Reference should be cross verified for the following statement
Altered central vascular hemodynamic, especially carotid artery stiffness and sclerosis, is a long recognised risk for cognitive decline in the elderly. (26,27)

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Sports/ Orthopedic Physiotherapy

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

32

Reviewer Report 17 Jul 2023

Edward Bliss, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

Not Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.129988.r183409

The authors have aimed to describe and find an association between the change in the central vascular and cognitive function during sitting with or without interruption. However, there are significant limitations in the study design, with the first being that ... Continue reading

The authors have aimed to describe and find an association between the change in the central vascular and cognitive function during sitting with or without interruption. However, there are significant limitations in the study design, with the first being that central vascular (i.e. cerebrovascular) measurements were not technically performed as the right common carotid artery is an extracranial vessel and not an intracranial vessel and, as such, is not reflective of central vascular function. Simple pre and post differences (i.e. t-tests) have been performed instead of comparing changes amongst groups (i.e. repeated measures ANOVA). There is also no discussion around the dynamic values (modelling) associated with the response of the blood vessel used in testing, as given the choice of the blood vessel, this may not be reflective of endothelial function. There is also no clear indication of the actual physical activity performed by the participants and key baseline characteristics are missing, such as blood pressure, thus making the conclusions drawn difficult to clearly ascertain. There are also other challenges associated with determining the outcomes of the study such as no details being provided about how the right common carotid artery was actually insonated (e.g. depth).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise: Cerebrovascular function, cognition, cardoivascular and neuroscience.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3

VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 06 Apr 2022

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 3 (revision) 29 Jan 25		read	read
Version 2 (revision) 22 Apr 22	read	read
Version 1 06 Apr 22

Edward Bliss, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
Watson Arulsingh D.R, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
Kevin S Heffernan, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment

Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

1 Views

05 Mar 2025 | for Version 3

Kevin S Heffernan, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

1 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

This study examined the effect of interrupted sitting breaks on carotid hemodynamics and executive function. Overall, there were minimal changes in carotid hemodynamics and executive function with prolonged sitting with small effects of LIT and MIT. Overall, this is an interesting and somewhat well-designed study to examine the effect of LIT and MIT on carotid hemodynamics and executive function. Unfortunately, designing a study that does not address cultural barriers necessary to include women is a fatal study design flaw. This study should be re-done and designed in a culturally sensitive way to include both biological sexes. Also, as designed, this study cannot test the proposed study hypothesis. The narrative can be improved to improve overall readability and clarity. Below are additional specific comments.

General Comments
Abstract methods. Can you please operationally define carotid hemodynamics and what specifically was measured? Please also include information on sample (biologic sex, age) and sample size. Can you also offer more insight into study design? How many visits, what were the various “intensities” for the micro-breaks? As prepared, it is not clear what was done, what was measured, and who completed the tasks.

Abstract results. Please correct “We” sentence 2.

Based on the results presented in the abstract, the conclusion is not a logical extension. For example, authors state that there was increased accuracy with prolonged sitting. How, then, could microbreaks mitigate cognitive risks if there are no cognitive declines? Please consider revising conclusions to better align with study results.

Introduction. Last sentence, paragraph 1. Please contextualize the mixed findings. Briefly describe what was found according to the literature.

Introduction. Paragraph 2, sentence 1. Please revise “Mechanistic plausible mechanisms…” is redundant.

Paragraph 2. Please operationalize central vascular functions. What is meant by this term? Additionally, almost all of the references cited do not relate to studies on vascular function and cognitive function. There are now numerous studies that have examined the effect of sitting on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, carotid stiffness, cerebral hemodynamics etc and a few that have examined microbreaks and exercise snacks. Almost all references cited in paragraph 2 are review papers and not primary sources. The authors are encouraged to improve the rigor of the literature that this study draws upon.

Introduction Paragraph 3. Please clearly operationally define central vascular functions. Specifically, what will be measured and why?

The study design is not designed to test the study hypothesis. Please consider either revising the hypothesis to better match the study or develop a new study that is designed to test the hypothesis.

Please confirm that all participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Study design, paragraph 2, last sentence. If this is a study purpose, then this should be included in the introduction.

The femoral artery is not a central artery. Moreover, lower limb blood flow is not mentioned in the introduction or study purpose (or results or discussion). Please clarify why this measure is being done and better integrate this measure into the paper.

“Due to cultural barriers…” is not clear. If this study was not designed to be culturally sensitive to ensure the inclusion of both men and women, that is a fatal study design flaw.

Based on study design, why not use a repeated measures analysis of variance and test for condition by time interactions?

Executive function was assessed 4 times for each condition. Please comment on the choice to focus on the 4^th hour measures. Justify this in the methods section.

Section 3.1. BMI. Please spell out abbreviations first time being used. How was height and weight measured to calculate BMI? This information is not provided in the methods.

Section 3.2. is difficult to navigate. Please pull the results apart. Focus on changes within a condition and then between conditions. Focus on one variable at a time.

The abstract states that there was an increase in accuracy with SIT, but table 2 shows a reduction (although the calculated change score is positive). Please clarify.

Table 2 is confusing. For example, if accuracy changed from 77 to 64, why is the change score shown as being positive? This obfuscates results.

The figures largely replicate the findings presented in Table 3 and are not needed.

The results for femoral artery measures are not presented.

Discussion paragraph 1. The authors conclude on carotid endothelial functions, but this was not specifically measured.

The final conclusion is challenging to interpret. This largely stems from conflicting reports of the effect of SIT on accuracy. The abstract states that accuracy increased, but the table shows a decrease (albeit the change score is listed as a positive change).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

No

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Vascular physiology, exercise physiology, effect of vascular function on cognitive function

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

8 Views

03 Feb 2025 | for Version 3

Watson Arulsingh D.R, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

8 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved

The author's response to the reviewer's comment is found to be satisfactory

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Sports/ Orthopedic Physiotherapy

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

23 Views

16 Nov 2023 | for Version 2

Watson Arulsingh D.R, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

23 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Approved With Reservations

Introduction

To reframe the following sentence
However, high sedentary behavior is evident and continue to rise globally and in contextual settings such as workplace and schools.

Add reference for the following sentences
Executive functions and working memory influences common work-related skills: decision making and problem-solving, resulting in better work productivity. The alteration in the vascular function and the resulting cognitive functions are viewed as plausible mechanistic links to poor problem-solving skills and low work productivity.

Add suitable references for the following statement
Few epidemiological evidence and acute laboratory studies have attempted to elucidate the above possible association between vascular endothelial functions, cognitive functions, and work productivity however, it remains inconclusive

Define executive function:

Study design
Please re- frame the following sentence
The findings presented in the study is based on the results of a randomized cross over the trial,

2.2 Participants
How did you administer the procedure mentioned below?
To be eligible, the potential participants should be physically inactive (self-reported physical activity levels of less than 600 METmin/week)

Discussion
Reference should be cross verified for the following statement
Altered central vascular hemodynamic, especially carotid artery stiffness and sclerosis, is a long recognised risk for cognitive decline in the elderly. (26,27)

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Sports/ Orthopedic Physiotherapy

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

Back to all reports

Reviewer Report

32 Views

17 Jul 2023 | for Version 2

Edward Bliss, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

32 Views Cite this report Responses(0)

Not Approved

The authors have aimed to describe and find an association between the change in the central vascular and cognitive function during sitting with or without interruption. However, there are significant limitations in the study design, with the first being that central vascular (i.e. cerebrovascular) measurements were not technically performed as the right common carotid artery is an extracranial vessel and not an intracranial vessel and, as such, is not reflective of central vascular function. Simple pre and post differences (i.e. t-tests) have been performed instead of comparing changes amongst groups (i.e. repeated measures ANOVA). There is also no discussion around the dynamic values (modelling) associated with the response of the blood vessel used in testing, as given the choice of the blood vessel, this may not be reflective of endothelial function. There is also no clear indication of the actual physical activity performed by the participants and key baseline characteristics are missing, such as blood pressure, thus making the conclusions drawn difficult to clearly ascertain. There are also other challenges associated with determining the outcomes of the study such as no details being provided about how the right common carotid artery was actually insonated (e.g. depth).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Reviewer Expertise

Cerebrovascular function, cognition, cardoivascular and neuroscience.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Gooding HC, Gidding SS, Moran AE, et al.: Challenges and Opportunities for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease Among Young Adults: Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(19): e016115. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[2] 2. Urbina EM, Kimball TR, Khoury PR, et al.: Increased arterial stiffness is found in adolescents with obesity or obesity-related type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Hypertens. 2010; 28(8): 1692–1698. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[3] 3. Urbina EM, Dolan LM, McCoy CE, et al.: Relationship between elevated arterial stiffness and increased left ventricular mass in adolescents and young adults. J. Pediatr. 2011; 158(5): 715–721. Publisher Full Text

[4] 4. Park JH, Moon JH, Kim HJ, et al.: Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2020; 41(6): 365–373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[5] 5. Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Dunstan DW, et al.: Sitting Less and Moving More: Implications for Hypertension. Hypertension. 2018; 72(5): 1037–1046. Publisher Full Text

[6] 6. Mclaughlin M, Atkin AJ, Starr L, et al.: Worldwide surveillance of self-reported sitting time: a scoping review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020; 17(1): 111. Publisher Full Text

[7] 7. Medina C, Jáuregui A, Hernández C, et al.: Physical inactivity and sitting time prevalence and trends in Mexican adults. Results from three national surveys. PLoS One. 2021; 16(7): e0253137. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[8] 8. Tulasiram B, Chandrasekaran B: Are Smartphones Better in Guiding Physical Activity Among Sedentary Young Adults? A Randomised Controlled Trial. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 11(1): 83–91. Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. Carter SE, Draijer R, Holder SM, et al.: Regular walking breaks prevent the decline in cerebral blood flow associated with prolonged sitting. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018; 125(3): 790–798. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[10] 10. Chandrasekaran B, Pesola AJ, Rao CR, et al.: Does breaking up prolonged sitting improve cognitive functions in sedentary adults? A mapping review and hypothesis formulation on the potential physiological mechanisms. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021; 22(1): 274. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Loh R, Stamatakis E, Folkerts D, et al.: Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Physical Activity Breaks on Blood Glucose, Insulin and Triacylglycerol Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020; 50(2): 295–330. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[12] 12. Hadgraft NT, Winkler E, Climie RE, et al.: Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021; 55(3): 144–154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[13] 13. Zongpa TC, Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A: Effectiveness of A Smartphone Directed Physical Activity Program on Cardiometabolic Disease Risk in Desk-Based Office Employees – A Pragmatic, Two-Arm, Parallel, Cluster Randomised Trial. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 10(4): 713–723. Publisher Full Text

[14] 14. Maasakkers CM, Melis RJF, Kessels RPC, et al.: The short-term effects of sedentary behaviour on cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive performance in older adults: a cross-over design on the potential impact of mental and/or physical activity. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2020; 12(1): 76. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[15] 15. Fouda AY, Fagan SC, Ergul A: Brain Vasculature and Cognition. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019; 39(4): 593–602. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Cristi-Montero C, Hernandez-Jaña S, Zavala-Crichton JP, et al.: Mentally active but not inactive sedentary behaviors are positively related to adolescents’ cognitive-academic achievements, a cross-sectional study — The Cogni-Action Project. Ment. Health Phys. Act [Internet]. 2023; 25: 100561. Publisher Full Text Reference Source

[17] 17. Nooijen CFJ, Blom V, Ekblom Ö, et al.: Improving office workers’ mental health and cognition: a 3-arm cluster randomized controlled trial targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior in multi-component interventions. BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar; 19(1):266. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] 18. Malek-Ahmadi M, Duff K, Chen K, et al.: Volumetric regional MRI and neuropsychological predictors of motor task variability in cognitively unimpaired, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and probable Alzheimer’s disease older adults. Exp. Gerontol [Internet]. 2023; 173: 112087. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Reference Source

[19] 19. Chueh TY, Chen YC, Hung TM: Acute effect of breaking up prolonged sitting on cognition: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar; 12(3): e050458. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[20] 20. Watts P, Hayee Shahid M, Bertotti M, et al.: Social, cognitive, behavioural and neighbourhood characteristics associated with sedentary time in men and women living in deprived neighbourhoods. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017 Aug; 17(7):904–912. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Labonté-LeMoyne E, Jutras MA, Léger PM, et al.: Does Reducing Sedentarity With Standing Desks Hinder Cognitive Performance? Hum. Factors. 2020 Jun; 62(4):603–612. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[22] 22. Panahi S, Tremblay A: Sedentariness and Health: Is Sedentary Behavior More Than Just Physical Inactivity? Front. Public Health. 2018; 6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[23] 23. Clark M, DiBenedetti D, Perez V: Cognitive dysfunction and work productivity in major depressive disorder. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 2016; 16(4): 455–463. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Association WM: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191–2194. Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Carter SE, Gladwell VF: Effect of breaking up sedentary time with callisthenics on endothelial function. J. Sports Sci. 2017; 35(15): 1508–1514. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[26] 26. Thosar SS, Bielko SL, Mather KJ, et al.: Effect of prolonged sitting and breaks in sitting time on endothelial function. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015; 47(4): 843–849. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[27] 27. Peddie MC, Kessell C, Bergen T, et al.: The effects of prolonged sitting, prolonged standing, and activity breaks on vascular function, and postprandial glucose and insulin responses: A randomised crossover trial. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1 January 2021): e0244841. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[28] 28. Stoner L, Barone Gibbs B, Meyer ML, et al.: A Primer on Repeated Sitting Exposure and the Cardiovascular System: Considerations for Study Design, Analysis, Interpretation, and Translation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021; 8: 716938. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Stoner L, Willey Q, Evans WS, et al.: Effects of acute prolonged sitting on cerebral perfusion and executive function in young adults: A randomized cross-over trial. Psychophysiology. 56(12): e13457. Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Paterson C, Fryer S, Zieff G, et al.: The Effects of Acute Exposure to Prolonged Sitting, With and Without Interruption, on Vascular Function Among Adults: A Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020; 50(11): 1929–1942. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[31] 31. Morishima T, Restaino RM, Walsh LK, et al.: Prior exercise and standing as strategies to circumvent sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction. Clin. Sci. (Lond.). 2017; 131(11): 1045–1053. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[32] 32. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods. 2009; 41(4): 1149–1160. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[33] 33. Dempsey RJ, Vemuganti R, Varghese T, Hermann BP: A review of carotid atherosclerosis and vascular cognitive decline: a new understanding of the keys to symptomology. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(2): 484–494. discussion 93-4. Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Azharuddin S, Rao CR, Chandrasekaran B, et al.: Effects of prolonged sitting interventions on chronic low-grade inflammation in adults: A protocol for a systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2021; 11(4): 614–627. Publisher Full Text

[35] 35. Marshall RS, Pavol MA, Cheung YK, et al.: Cognitive Impairment Correlates Linearly with Mean Flow Velocity by Transcranial Doppler below a Definable Threshold. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra. 2020; 10(1): 21–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[36] 36. Marshall RS, Asllani I, Pavol MA, et al.: Altered cerebral hemodyamics and cortical thinning in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12): e0189727. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[37] 37. Gutierrez J, Kulick E, Park Moon Y, et al.: Brain Arterial Diameters and Cognitive Performance: The Northern Manhattan Study. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2018; 24(4): 335–346. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[38] 38. Elias MF, Torres RV, Davey A: Carotid Artery Blood Flow Velocities and Cognitive Performance: Forecasting Cognitive Decline. Am. J. Hypertens. 2019; 32(3): 237–239. Publisher Full Text

[39] 39. Zhang H, Liu H, Dong Y, et al.: Low carotid wall shear stress independently accelerates the progression of cognitive impairment and white matter lesions in the elderly. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(13): 11402–11413. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[40] 40. Credeur DP, Miller SM, Jones R, et al.: Impact of Prolonged Sitting on Peripheral and Central Vascular Health. Am. J. Cardiol. 2019; 123(2): 260–266. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[41] 41. McManus AM, Ainslie PN, Green DJ, et al.: Impact of prolonged sitting on vascular function in young girls. Exp. Physiol. 2015; 100(11): 1379–1387. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[42] 42. Restaino RM, Walsh LK, Morishima T, et al.: Endothelial dysfunction following prolonged sitting is mediated by a reduction in shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016; 310(5): H648–H653. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[43] 43. Restaino RM, Holwerda SW, Credeur DP, et al.: Impact of prolonged sitting on lower and upper limb micro- and macrovascular dilator function. Exp. Physiol. 2015; 100(7): 829–838. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[44] 44. Morishima T, Restaino RM, Walsh LK, et al.: Prolonged sitting-induced leg endothelial dysfunction is prevented by fidgeting. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016; 311(1): H177–H182. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[45] 45. Wennberg P, Boraxbekk CJ, Wheeler M, et al.: Acute effects of breaking up prolonged sitting on fatigue and cognition: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(2): e009630. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[46] 46. Carter SE, Draijer R, Holder SM, et al.: Effect of different walking break strategies on superficial femoral artery endothelial function. Physiol. Rep. 2019; 7(16): e14190. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[47] 47. Gibbs BB, Kowalsky RJ, Perdomo SJ, et al.: Effect of alternating standing and sitting on blood pressure and pulse wave velocity during a simulated workday in adults with overweight/obesity. J. Hypertens. 2017; 35(12): 2411–2418. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[48] 48. Ziyatdinov A, Kim J, Prokopenko D, et al.: Estimating the effective sample size in association studies of quantitative traits. G3 (Bethesda). 2021; 11. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[49] 49. Patel K, Rössler A, Lackner HK, et al.: Effect of postural changes on cardiovascular parameters across gender. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(28): e4149. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[50] 50. Levenson J, Pessana F, Gariepy J, et al.: Gender differences in wall shear-mediated brachial artery vasoconstriction and vasodilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001; 38(6): 1668–1674. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[51] 51. Sukumar S: Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial.2022. Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:I8KqlavhS35wrCHVTOZjrQ== [fileUNF].Publisher Full Text

Alteration in central vascular and cognitive functions during simulated work conditions in males – a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Revised Amendments from Version 2

1. Introduction

2. Methods

2.1 Study design

Figure 1. Design of the present study.

2.2 Participants

2.3 Measures

2.4 ‘Snack’ivity interventions

2.5 Procedure

2.6 Data analysis

3. Results

Figure 2. Flowchart showing the screening, inclusion of the participants and the secondary analysis of the data extracted from the randomised cross over trial.

3.1 Baseline characteristics

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the participants.

3.2 Change in central vascular endothelial functions and the executive functions within the conditions:

Table 2. Change in central vascular endothelial functions and the executive functions within the conditions.

3.3 Correlation among changes in central vascular functions and the cognitive functions

Table 3. Correlation among changes in central vascular functions and the cognitive functions.

Figure 3A. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4th hour from the baseline during SIT intervention.

Figure 3B. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4th hour from the baseline during LIT intervention.

Figure 3C. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4th hour from the baseline during MIT intervention.

4. Discussion

4.1 Limitations

Data availability

Underlying data

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated

Figure 3A. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during SIT intervention.

Figure 3B. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during LIT intervention.

Figure 3C. Correlation between the change in carotid artery functions and cognitive functions at the 4^th hour from the baseline during MIT intervention.