Home Browse Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapyinCOVID-19patients globally:...
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
▬
✚
Systematic Review

Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Sirish Raj Pandey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-7794
1, Saroj Adhikari Yadav
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-9160
2, Swotantra Gautam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3022
3, [...] Kalpana Giri4, Anirudra Devkota
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-4640
5, Shipra Shrestha6, Shreya Bhandari6, Santosh Baniya7, Bibhuti Adhikari8, Bibek Adhikari
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5996-2886
1, Shila Neupane2, Jenish Bhandari9
Sirish Raj Pandey
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-7794
1, Saroj Adhikari Yadav
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-9160
2, [...] Swotantra Gautam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3022
3, Kalpana Giri4, Anirudra Devkota
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-4640
5, Shipra Shrestha6, Shreya Bhandari6, Santosh Baniya7, Bibhuti Adhikari8, Bibek Adhikari
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5996-2886
1, Shila Neupane2, Jenish Bhandari9
PUBLISHED 19 Jan 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

Abstract

Background: Novel Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can affect multiple organs, including the lungs, resulting in pneumonia. Apart from steroids, other anti-COVID drugs that have been studied appear to have little or no effect on COVID-19 pneumonia. There is a well-known history of inflammatory disease, including pneumonia, treated with low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT). It reduces the production of proinflammatory cytokines, Interleukin-1a (IL-1a), and leukocyte recruitment.  
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, with keywords such as “radiotherapy,” “low-dose radiation therapy,” “low-dose irradiation,” “covid-19 pneumonia,” “SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia,” and “covid pneumonia.” with additional filters for human studies and customized articles in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We reviewed randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies with a clearly defined intervention, including low-dose radiotherapy alone or in combination with any therapy to treat COVID-19 pneumonia from December 2019 to May 2021. Patients receiving standard or high-dose radiotherapy, including for other diseases, were excluded. Zotero software was used to collect and organize research from various databases, remove duplicates, extract relevant data, and record decisions. Participants’ demographics and baseline status were obtained from the full-text articles along with the intervention’s outcome/effect on patient status. 
Results: Four studies with 61 participants that met the inclusion criteria were included. One was a double-blind randomized controlled trial, one a non-randomized trial, while the other two were single-arm clinical trials. Low-dose radiation therapy did not show any significant improvement in COVID-19 patients. 
Conclusion: Only two studies included in this review demonstrated an improvement in inflammatory markers; however, patients were also given steroids or other drugs. Therefore, the confounding effects must be considered before drawing conclusions. This systematic review does not support mortality benefit, clinical course improvement, or imaging changes with LDRT.

Keywords

COVID-19 pneumonia, CT-scan, low-dose radiation therapy, LDRT, systematic review

Corresponding author: Saroj Adhikari Yadav
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright:  © 2022 Pandey SR et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Pandey SR, Adhikari Yadav S, Gautam S et al. Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74558.1) First published: 19 Jan 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74558.1) Latest published: 19 Jan 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74558.1)

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has led to global catastrophe since December 2019.1 Mostly COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) patients are asymptomatic or present with mild to moderate symptoms. Some patients, however, may present with severe symptoms and quickly deteriorate to end-organ failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).2,3 The ICU (Intensive Care Unit) settings management has shown improvements in the survival of patients.4 Still, the management has remained primarily supportive, and more intervention and treatment options are required for severe and critically ill patients in ICU.5 Studies have shown diffuse alveolar damage with inflammatory infiltrates in postmortem analysis of COVID-19 patients, which compromises the gas exchange.6 The mortality rate among critically ill patients in ICU still remains as high as 30–40% globally.7 Mortality up to 80% is seen once a COVID-19 patient is dependent on mechanical ventilation.8–10 ARDS leading to respiratory failure is the most common cause of mortality among COVID-19 patients.11

Viral pneumonia can result in systemic inflammation and multiorgan failure due to cytokine storms caused by a severe inflammatory response in the body.12 Such excessive host immune response and direct viral damage can not only cause significant lung injury and diffuse alveolar damage but also have a reaction like local microvascular thrombosis and raised inflammatory markers.6,13 Remdesivir and other studied antiviral drugs did not significantly affect overall mortality,5 the World Health Organization has recommended not using these drugs based on the latest studies.14

One novel approach suggested for COVID-19 patients is the whole-lung LDRT (low-dose radiation therapy).15 LDRT has anti-inflammatory properties like lowering proinflammatory cytokine levels (e.g., Interleukin 1a (IL-1a)) and inhibiting the recruitment of leukocytes.16–19 Hence, since the 20th century, LDRT has been used to manage inflammatory disorders, including pneumonia, with several studies showing potential benefits.15,20 The evidence of management of viral pneumonia in the past has led to the proposal of LDRT as a possible intervention to manage COVID-19 pneumonia.21,22 Numerous prior studies have described the mechanism of how LDRT can provide a therapeutic advantage.14,23–29 However, the efficacy of LDRT is not well studied for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.5 Because of the limited treatment options for COVID-19 and the minimal risk of toxicity, several clinical trials of LDRT for COVID-19 management are being carried out with 0.3 to 1.5 Gy (Gray) radiation doses.30,31

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the clinical and radiological effects of LDRT in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) due to COVID-19.

Methods

Protocol registration

This systematic review was performed to analyze the effectiveness of LDRT for COVID-19 pneumonia patients globally. This review was registered on PROSPERO on 6th March 2021 (CRD42021258776).

Eligibility criteria

These criteria were sought for inclusion in the study:

  • A) Population: COVID-19 patients globally.

  • B) Intervention: Low dose radiotherapy/low dose radiation therapy with any combination of treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia.

  • C) Comparison with a control group in the study.

  • D) Outcomes: Improvement in lung consolidation (chest X-ray and CT scans) and inflammatory markers (level of cytokines, I.L./Interleukins, e.g., IL6), O2 saturation levels, C-reactive protein (CRP))

  • E) Study Design: Randomised controlled trial (RCT), cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, quasi-experimental, case studies.

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies and cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies with a clearly defined intervention published between December 2019 and May 2021. We excluded case reports, reviews, perspective/opinion articles, newspaper articles, book chapters/medical books.

Data extraction

Twelve reviewers conducted study selection (SRP, SB1, AD, JB, SB2, SS, Bibh. A, KG, SG, SAY, Bibe. A, SN). Zotero software (version 5.0.96.2) was used to assemble and organize the studies obtained through the various databases. All ten reviewers then screened the titles and abstracts of the studies in four groups, with two members in each group. Duplicate studies were removed. Five reviewers, SRP, SB1, AD, JB, and SB2, independently screened records for inclusion. Four reviewers, SRP, SS, Bibh. A, and KG, checked the decisions. We included human studies involving both sexes in which patients received low-dose radiation therapy to treat COVID-19 pneumonia. The risk of bias and quality of studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 (RoB 2), Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools for before-after studies with no control group. Any confusion or disagreements were resolved among all the members. Four reviewers, SRP, SG, SAY, and KG discussed the results and prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and five reviewers, SRP, SAY, SG, Bibe. A and SN reviewed subsequent edits. The full-text articles were screened to obtain the following data: author, year of publication, study design, study setting, participant demographics and baseline status, type, duration and times of intervention, and outcome/effect on the patient status following the intervention. We also extracted the primary outcomes, which were the number of deaths or discharges following the intervention, and the secondary outcomes, which were the oxygen status of the patients, CT-scan changes, and requirement for mechanical ventilation following the intervention. We also determined any toxicity of the intervention and changes in inflammatory markers.

Search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was performed on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Google Scholar using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords termed “radiotherapy,” “low-dose radiation therapy,” “low-dose irradiation,” “covid-19 pneumonia”, “SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia”, “covid pneumonia”, and “coronavirus pneumonia” with additional filters of human studies and English language (Please see underlying data32). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to search for the studies which evaluated the role of the effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia patients globally. Five reviewers, SRP, SB1, AD, JB, and SB2, independently screened records for inclusion. Four reviewers, SRP, SS, BA, and KG checked decisions to include articles. In case of dissent, all the reviewers re-evaluated the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the final decision was made based on the majority’s judgment. The PRISMA checklist 2020 was followed throughout the process.32

Risk of bias assessment

For the RCTs, we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) to assess any bias in the randomization process, any deviation from the intended intervention, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, selection of reported results, and overall risk of bias. The ROBINS-I Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions was used to assess bias due to confounding, selection of participants into the study, classification of interventions, deviations from intended interventions, missing data, and measurement of measurement outcomes, selection of the reported result. The National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools were used for the before-after study with no control group for single-arm studies. Seven reviewers, SRP, KG, AD, SS, SB1, Bibh. A, and SB2 were involved in the risk of bias assessment.

Results

Studies included

The search using the appropriate terms yielded 1644 potentially relevant articles from Pubmed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Embase. Through the database search, we found 1644 studies, and 351 among them were identified as duplicates and removed. We screened 1293 studies with titles and abstracts and excluded 1227 studies among them. Then the remaining 66 studies were thoroughly assessed for full-text eligibility. Finally, a total of four studies were listed for the qualitative analysis. This information is visually presented in the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).

d260839a-b4d3-414e-9deb-398f235c1299_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.

Study characteristics

Sanmamed et al. (2021) studied the effects of 100 cGy radiotherapy on total lungs in a single fraction on patients who were COVID-19 positive, at phase two or three by lung involvement or oxygen requirement. The authors suggested that low-dose radiotherapy could also be a treatment option even after 14 days if the anti-COVID treatment fails. However, there is a possible confounding effect of prior anti-COVID therapy with steroids, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, tocilizumab, or remdesivir in this study. The limited number of patients and it being a single-arm study are other limitations.31

A trial conducted in Georgia, USA (Hess et al., 2021) studied the effects of 1.5 Gy radiotherapy on both lungs of COVID-19 patients. They selected ten patients that were oxygen-dependent and non-intubated. The control group was chosen from a separate trial conducted in another institution among COVID-19 positive patients. They were matched with the intervention group by age and comorbidities and were given supportive treatment with or without anti-COVID drug therapy. Four patients in the intervention group received azithromycin, one received steroids, and all ten received primary supportive care; hence, the study has possible confounding effects.33

In Tehran, Iran, Ameri et al., 2021 studied the effects of 0.5 or 1.0 Gy single fraction low-dose whole-lung irradiation (LD-WLI) in 10 patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Five patients received 0.5 Gy single fraction radiotherapy, four received 1 Gy single fraction radiotherapy, and one received 0.5 Gy radiation twice; a second therapy was given after clinical deterioration following the first few days of improvement.34

Researchers in Switzerland (Papachristofilou et al., 2021) conducted a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in which 22 patients were randomized in two groups with 11 patients in each, receiving 1 Gy low-dose radiation vs. sham radiation. The study did not significantly improve ventilator-free days after 15 days, overall survival, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and inflammatory markers when compared among two groups. The lymphocyte reduction was significant in the low-dose radiation group in comparison. The authors indicated no role of low-dose radiotherapy in treating COVID-19 pneumonia.5 The major study characteristics are tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the included studies.

No.Author/publication yearStudy designStudy siteNumber of patients (N)Patient demographicsIntervention
1Sanmamed et al. (2021)31Prospective, single-arm, phase 1/2 clinical trialServicio de Oncología Radioterápica. Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid, Spain9 (single arm study)The median age was 66 (interquartile range, 57–77); Male 68 yrs required domiciliary O2.100 cGy (Centigray) to total lungs in a single fraction
2Hess et al. (2021)33Investigator-initiated, single-institution combined phase 1 and 2 trialEmory University Hospital Midtown/Winship cancer institute; Emory Saint Joseph’s Hospital20 (10 in intervention and 10 in the control group)The median age was 78 (43–104) and 75 (44–99) for the LDRT and control cohorts.1.5 Gy whole-lung low-dose radiotherapy
3Ameri et al. (2021)34Single-arm pilot trialShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran10 (single arm)The median age was 75 years (range, 60–87 years)0.5–1 Gy radiotherapy.
4Papachristofilou et al. (2021)5Randomized double-blind studyUniversity Hospital of Basel in Basel, Switzerland; ICU22 (11 in intervention and 11 in the control group)Median of 75 years old (range, 54–84)1 Gy whole-lung LDRT or sham radiation therapy (sham-RT)

Risk of bias

We included four studies, which had different study designs. Therefore, we applied different risk of bias assessment tools for different studies. Studies one (Sanmamed et al., 2021) and three (Ameri et al., 2021) were single-arm before and after studies,31,34 study two (Hess et al., 2021) was quasi-experimental,33 and study four (Papachristofilou et al., 2021) was an RCT.5 For studies one and three, we used the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools for before-after studies with no control group for single-arm studies. According to the NIH quality assessment tool, we found both studies to have fair risk of bias. The assessments of Sanmamed et al.,31 and Ameri et al.,34 are presented in Table 2. For study 2 (Hess et al., 2021), we used the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I)37 and found the study to have a moderate risk of bias. We generated a traffic light plot and summary of the assessment, presented in Figure 2. In study 4 (Papachristofilou et al., 2021), we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 (RoB 2).5 We found the study to have a low risk of bias (Figure 3).32

Table 2. Risk of bias assessment of study 1 by Sanmamed et al.31 and study 3 by Ameri et al.34 carried out according to National Institute of Health quality assessment tools for before-after study with no control group.

Questions for AssessmentYES/NO/Others (CD, NR, NA)*
Was the study question or objective clearly stated?YESYES
Were eligibility/selection criteria for the study population prespecified and clearly described?YESYES
Were the participants in the study representative of those who would be eligible for the test/service/intervention in the general or clinical population of interest?YESYES
Were all eligible participants that met the prespecified entry criteria enrolled?NOYES
Was the sample size sufficiently large to provide confidence in the findings? Was the test/service/intervention clearly described and delivered consistently across the study population?NONO
Was the test/service/intervention clearly described and delivered consistently across the study population?YESYES
Was the outcome measures prespecified, clearly defined, valid, reliable, and assessed consistently across all study participants?YESNO
Were the people assessing the outcomes blinded to the participants’ exposures/interventions?NRNO
Was the loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less? Were those lost to follow-up accounted for in the analysis?NO, CDYES, YES
Did the statistical methods examine changes in outcome measures from before to after the intervention? Were statistical tests done that provided p values for the pre-to-post changes?YES, YESYES, YES
Were outcome measures of interest taken multiple times before the intervention and multiple times after the intervention (i.e., did they use an interrupted time-series design)?NR, YESNR, YES
If the intervention was conducted at a group level, did the statistical analysis take into account the use of individual-level data to determine effects at the group level?NONO
OverallFAIRFAIR

* CD (Cannot determine); N.A. (Not applicable); N.R. (Not reported).

d260839a-b4d3-414e-9deb-398f235c1299_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Risk of bias assessment of study two by Hess et al.33

d260839a-b4d3-414e-9deb-398f235c1299_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Risk of bias assessment of study four by Papachristofilou et al.5

Results of individual studies

In study one (Sanmamed et al., 2021), there was a decrease in the acute phase reactants after one week of radiotherapy but compared to baseline, only lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed a significant decline (P = 0.04). The preliminary report also showed significant improvement in the SatO2/FiO2 index (SAFI). Seven patients were discharged, maintaining supplemental oxygen (maximum 3L).31

The intervention group showed earlier clinical recovery and discharge in study two (Hess et al., 2021). The 28-day overall survival had no significant difference, while freedom from intubation was 90% vs. 60% (P = 0.16). Lower oxygen requirement at the time of intervention and less time to clinical recovery (P = 0.01) were needed by patients aged 65 or over in the intervention group. Still, no significant changes in the control group were observed. Neither group showed significant improvement in radiographic imaging. The study showed a significant reduction in inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein (CRP) and LDH), cardiac markers, white blood cells. There was a considerable lack of leukocytosis in the intervention group compared to the control group. Although not significant, the study suggested the possibility of prevention of elevation of hepatic biomarkers by low-dose radiotherapy.33

In study three (Ameri et al., 2021), the overall clinical recovery shown by the study was 60%. Still, there was no significant improvement in clinical recovery and SpO2 among both groups of radiation dose patients. In the trial, four patients died before discharge, and two died immediately after being discharged. Patients who survived showed some improvement in the inflammatory markers.34

In study four (Papachristofilou et al., 2021), the study did not significantly improve ventilator-free days after 15 days, overall survival, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and inflammatory markers when compared among the two groups. The lymphocyte reduction was significant in the low-dose radiation group in comparison.5

The major outcomes of the review are summarized in Table 3, where descriptive comparative data are presented as the same measures were not followed throughout all four studies.

Table 3. Individual study results.

No.OutcomesToxicity (N)Reduction in inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP, IL6, D-dimer, ferritin, etc.)Concomitant interventions
PrimarySecondary
Deaths (N)Discharge(N)Oxygen statusMechanical ventilation requiredCT-scan findings
Sanmamed et al. (2021)31TwoSevenSeven patients presented with baseline Severe
Respiratory Failure (SRF) and 2 with Mild Respiratory Failure (MRF)
Seventy-two hours after R.T., there was a significant improvement (P = 0.01): 2 patients continued with SRF, 3 patients with MRF and four patients recovered normal SAFI (Oxygen saturation/Inspired fraction of oxygen) Index. A week later, the significant improvement persisted (P = 0.01), One patient continued with SRF, 3 with MRF, and 5 recovered normal SAFI		Not required (at discharge)Significant improvement on day 7 (P = 0.03)GRADE 2 Lymphopenia
(2)
One patient with baseline Grade 3 worsened to Grade 4 one week after R.T.		Reduced.
Only LDH reduced significantly.
(P = 0.04)		Prednisone or methylprednisolone, Hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir/ritonavir
Tocilizumab Remdesivir Antithrombotic
Hess et al. (2021)33One death in each group (One in intervention, one in control)Nine in each groupMedian P: F ratio: ratio of arterial pressure (mm Hg) of oxygen (PaO2) to a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (range)
Intervention-138 (79–281), Control-194 (100–452), Combined- 171 (79–452) (P = 0.25)		One patient in intervention and four patients in control group required intubation after intervention.Any radiographic improvement by day 21 occurred in 90% Vs 57% of patients in the LDRT compared to control cohorts (P = 0.12)
Intervention group- improvement in 9; Control group-improvement in 4.		Reduced monocytes and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio.
Upper G.I. acute toxicity in 1 patient.		Significant reduction.IV hydrocortisone azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine, Prednisone, remdesivir.
Ameri et al. (2021)34Four6 (2 patients among discharged died after being discharged- after one day and three days respectively.)The mean magnitude of the improvement in SpO2 at days 1 and 2 after R.T. was 2.4% (4.8%) and 3.6% (6.1%), respectively. In the 0.5 and 1.0 Gy groups, the mean improvement in SpO2 within two days was 6.1 versus 0.25% (P = 0.95), respectively.Not required.NANANot significant.Not received.
Papachristofilou et al. (2021)5Six in the intervention group; five in the control group (Sham irradiation)Four patients in each group were discharged.no significant differences were seen in oxygenation changes within 24 hours (LDRT vs. sham-RT: median PaO2/FIO2 change + 5 vs. + 9, P = 0.49)Mechanical ventilation free days for 4-4 patients in each group after 15 days.NAReduced lymphocyte count.No significant difference between groups.Dexamethasone Remdesivir
Experimental drug

Discussion

Two of our included studies indicated improvement in inflammatory markers to some extent with low dose radiotherapy, but these studies also prescribed steroids or other drugs like azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, remdesivir to patients31,33; the two other studies did not show any significant improvement.5,33 LDRT has been used to treat various acute and chronic inflammatory diseases since 1900; Musser and Edsall introduced radiotherapy to treat pneumonia in 1905.35 The mechanism of single LDRT (0.2 to 1.0) proved to be highly effective in treating pneumonia. It involved the induction of an anti-inflammatory phenotype that led to rapid clinical improvements and markedly reduced mortality risk.15 COVID-19 patients with severe pulmonary diseases have increased expressions of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, ferritin, elevated D dimers, and proinflammatory cytokines.36 In such cases, low-dose radiation therapy could provide a therapeutic arsenal against COVID-19-related complications and associated morbidity and mortality.37 COVID with ARDS requires oxygen and ventilatory support, yet mortality during mechanical ventilation is high despite such measures.36 COVID-19 can cause inflammation in the lungs, hypoxemia, and increased breathing. Patients may need early intubation, further damaging the lungs.38 In such cases, several inflammatory conditions, including bacterial/viral pneumonia, have been successfully treated with radiation therapy.39

The study by Sanmamed et al. showed significant improvement in extension score between the first simulation computed tomography (CT) scan and day seven CT-scan after radiotherapy (p = 0.03). Still, no significant difference was found in severity score by imaging.31 Other studies did not follow nor study CT-scan changes homogeneously before and after radiotherapy.5,33,34 Hence, our review could not determine if LDRT plays any role in bringing significant changes/improvement in C.T. chest findings in COVID-19 pneumonia. The features of the chest C.T. of COVID patients depend on scanning time, age of the patient, the condition of disease during follow-up, immune status of the patient, drug therapy provided, and the underlying pathology.40 The most common findings of C.T. are ground-glass opacity at peripheral and lower lobes, patchy consolidations in multiple areas with the peripheral and central distribution.40,41

Three of the included studies showed reduced white blood cells, especially lymphocytes, essential for resistance against COVID-19. These three studies also used other anti-COVID drugs like steroids such as dexamethasone, remdesivir, or monoclonal antibodies.5,31,33 Dexamethasone can cause lymphopenia,42 but our review has no concrete evidence as to what caused the reduction of white blood cells. Remdesevir has shown an improved rate of clinical recovery in COVID-19 patients.43

Studies regarding the toxicity of LDRT suggest that doses lower than 1 Gy may not majorly concern short-term or long-term follow-up.39 The risk of radiation injury in medical imaging has been discussed in the past and hovers between 10 mSv to 100 mSv.44 but, according to the 2006 BEIR VII lifetime attributable cancer risk model, 1 in 1000 can develop cancer with a radiologic procedure dose of 10 mSv.45 However, evidence suggests that the radiation dose of 0.15–1.5 Gy is linearly related to solid cancer induction (i.e., a range of approximately 1 log).46 Ameri et al. suggest LDRT (<1 Gy) can yield anti-inflammatory effects, while more than 1 Gy can enhance the proinflammatory development and requires more extensive study.34 Various experiments in cats and mice exposed to 0.5–1 Gy 24h after virus inoculation showed a beneficial protective effect.39 Treatment with LDRT suggests improved cytokine release syndrome, a significant reduction in total leukocyte counts, serum creatinine, serum liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST).39 For COVID-19 patients that present with a cytokine storm, a single total dose of 0.3–0.5 Gy targeted radiotherapy is beneficial in reducing the possibility of any immediate or long-term adverse effects.24

A recovery trial showed lower 28-day mortality among those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization with dexamethasone.13 Hence, this steroid is a proven medication with a mortality benefit at the moment. However, Dexamethasone also has several side effects like hormonal imbalance, weight gain, fluid retention, anxiety, disturbed sleep patterns, withdrawal symptoms, etc. There is a risk of fungal infection, as recently seen with a rise in Mucormycosis cases in India (steroid side effects)47 Thus, having LDRT as a treatment option for those who are not ideal candidates for steroids could prove to be a boon.

Limitations

The studies included in this review have a limited number of patients, mainly assessed in a single facility. They cannot, therefore, truly determine the actual effect on the general population. The included studies also used different methods, including two single-arm studies, one RCT, and one non-randomized (Quasi-experimental) study.5,31,33,34 Although two studies showed some improvement regarding inflammatory markers, and one showed improvement in extension score before concluding, we must also consider the possibility of confounding effects by using drugs capable of anti-inflammatory effect dexamethasone and remdesivir.43,48,49 All the included studies do not have thorough follow-up information about ventilator use and their outcome either, so it is hard to make any firm conclusions about how LDRT can bring about changes to lung status during COVID pneumonia.

Conclusion

Only two studies included in this review demonstrated an improvement in inflammatory markers; however, patients were also given steroids or other drugs. Therefore, the confounding effects must be considered. This systematic review does not support any clinical benefit from LDRT. As of now, this systematic review of the available literature does not provide sufficient evidence to back up any mortality benefit, improvement in the clinical course, or imaging changes with LDRT. As a possible alternative treatment, we suggest large-scale studies with proper dose calculations and greater vigilance of the short-term and long-term beneficial effects and toxicity.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Underlying data for ‘Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review’ https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5757326.v132

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • • Data Extraction

  • • Search strategy and authors role

  • • PubMed search details

  • • Risk of bias assessment of study 1 and 3 (word file created following the NIH quality assessment tool guideline)

  • • Risk of bias assessment of study 2 (ROBIN-I)

  • • Risk of bias assessment for study 4 (ROB-2)

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: PRISMA checklist for ‘Effectiveness of low dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review’. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5757326.v132

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0)

Acknowledgements

We are highly thankful to our collaborators from ‘Health Action and Research’ – Dr Rolina Dhital, Dr Richa Shah, Dr Carmina Shrestha.

References

  • 1.  Powell EV: Roentgen therapy of lobar pneumonia. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1938 Jan 1; 110(1): 19–22. Publisher Full Text
  • 2.  Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al.: Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15; 395(10223): 507–513. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 3.  Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al.: Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020 Jul 1; 180(7): 934–943. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 4.  Dennis JM, McGovern AP, Vollmer SJ, et al.: Improving Survival of Critical Care Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in England: A National Cohort Study, March to June 2020*. Crit. Care Med. 2021 Feb; 49(2): 209–214. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 5.  Papachristofilou A, Finazzi T, Blum A, et al.: Low-Dose Radiation Therapy for Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Double-Blind Study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021 Aug 1; 110(5): 1274–1282. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 6.  Carsana L, Sonzogni A, Nasr A, et al.: Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: a two-centre descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020 Oct 1; 20(10): 1135–1140. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 7.  Armstrong RA, Kane AD, Kursumovic E, et al.: Mortality in patients admitted to intensive care with COVID-19: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Anaesthesia. 2021 Apr; 76(4): 537–548. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 8.  Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al.: Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15; 395(10223): 497–506. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 9.  Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al.: Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region — Case Series. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020 May 21; 382(21): 2012–2022. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 10.  Auld SC, Caridi-Scheible M, Blum JM, et al.: ICU and Ventilator Mortality Among Critically Ill Adults With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit. Care Med. 2020 May 26; 48: e799–e804. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 11.  Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, et al.: Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020 May 1; 46(5): 846–848. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 12.  Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al.: COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28; 395(10229): 1033–1034. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 13.  RECOVERY Collaborative GroupHorby P, Lim WS, et al.: Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021 Feb 25; 384(8): 693–704. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 14.  Kern PM, Keilholz L, Forster C, et al.: Low-dose radiotherapy selectively reduces adhesion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to endothelium in vitro. Radiother. Oncol. 2000 Mar 1; 54(3): 273–282. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 15.  Calabrese EJ, Dhawan G: How Radiotherapy Was Historically Used To Treat Pneumonia: Could It Be Useful Today?. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2013 Dec 13; 86(4): 555–570. PubMed Abstract
  • 16.  Rödel F, Keilholz L, Herrmann M, et al.: Radiobiological mechanisms in inflammatory diseases of low-dose radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2007 Jan 1; 83(6): 357–366. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 17.  Royo LT, Redondo GA, Pianetta MÁ, et al.: Low-Dose radiation therapy for benign pathologies. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2020; 25(2): 250–254. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 18.  Schaue D, Jahns J, Hildebrandt G, et al.: Radiation treatment of acute inflammation in mice. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2005 Sep; 81(9): 657–667. Publisher Full Text
  • 19.  Arenas M, Gil F, Gironella M, et al.: Time course of anti-inflammatory effect of low-dose radiotherapy: Correlation with TGF-β1 expression. Radiother. Oncol. 2008 Mar 1; 86(3): 399–406. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 20.  Oppenheimer A: Roentgen therapy of interstitial pneumonia. J. Pediatr. 1943 Nov 1; 23(5): 534–538. Publisher Full Text
  • 21.  Kirkby C, Mackenzie M: Is low dose radiation therapy a potential treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia?. Radiother. Oncol. 2020; 147: 221. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 22.  Kefayat A, Ghahremani F: Low dose radiation therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia: A double-edged sword. Radiother. Oncol. 2020 Jun; 147: 224–225. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 23.  Hildebrandt MP, Seed CN, Freemantle CAS, et al.: Mechanisms of the anti-inflammatory activity of low-dose radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1998 Jan 1; 74(3): 367–378. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 24.  Calabrese E, Dhawan G, Kapoor R, et al.: Radiotherapy treatment of human inflammatory diseases and conditions: Optimal dose. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2019 Aug 1; 38(8): 888–898. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 25.  Arenas M, Sabater S, Hernández V, et al.: Anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose radiotherapy. Indications, dose, and radiobiological mechanisms involved. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Rontgengesellschaft Al. 2012 Nov; 188(11): 975–981. Publisher Full Text
  • 26.  Gyuleva I, Djounova J, Rupova I: Impact of Low-Dose Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation on T-Cell Populations and Subpopulations and Humoral Factors Included in the Immune Response. Dose-Response Publ. Int. Hormesis. Soc. 2018 Sep; 16(3): 155932581878556. Publisher Full Text
  • 27.  Li J, Yao Z-Y, She C, et al.: Effects of low-dose X-ray irradiation on activated macrophages and their possible signal pathways. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10): e0185854. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 28.  Schröder S, Broese S, Baake J, et al.: Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Human EA.hy926 Endothelial Cells under Inflammatory Conditions and Their Interactions with A549 Tumour Cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2019; 2019: 1–14. Publisher Full Text
  • 29.  Pandey R, Shankar BS, Sharma D, et al.: Low dose radiation induced immunomodulation: effect on macrophages and CD8+ T cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2005 Nov; 81(11): 801–812. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 30.  Prasanna PG, Woloschak GE, DiCarlo AL, et al.: Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?. Radiat. Res. 2020 Nov 10; 194(5): 452–464. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 31.  Sanmamed N, Alcantara P, Cerezo E, et al.: Low-Dose Radiation Therapy in the Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia (LOWRAD-Cov19): Preliminary Report. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021 Mar 15; 109(4): 880–885. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 32.  Pandey SR: Underlying data. Figshare. Collection. 2021. Publisher Full Text
  • 33.  Hess CB, Nasti TH, Dhere VR, et al.: Immunomodulatory Low-Dose Whole-Lung Radiation for Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Pneumonia. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021 Mar 15; 109(4): 867–879. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 34.  Ameri A, Ameri P, Rahnama N, et al.: Low-Dose Whole-Lung Irradiation for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Final Results of a Pilot Study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021 Mar 15; 109(4): 859–866. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 35.  Desjardins AU: Radiotherapy for inflammatory conditions. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1941 Jan 18; 116(3): 225–231. Publisher Full Text
  • 36.  Calabrese EJ, Kozumbo WJ, Kapoor R, et al.: Nrf2 activation putatively mediates clinical benefits of low-dose radiotherapy in COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): Novel mechanistic considerations. Radiother. Oncol. J. Eur. Soc. Ther. Radiol. Oncol. 2021 Jul; 160: 125–131. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 37.  Dhawan G, Kapoor R, Dhawan R, et al.: Low dose radiation therapy as a potential life saving treatment for COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Radiother. Oncol. J. Eur. Soc. Ther. Radiol. Oncol. 2020 Jun; 147: 212–216. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 38.  Möhlenkamp S, Thiele H: Ventilation of COVID-19 patients in intensive care units. Herz. 2020 Jun; 45(4): 329–331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 39.  Del Castillo R, Martinez D, Sarria GJ, et al.: Low-dose radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumonia treatment: case report, procedure, and literature review. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Rontgengesellschaft Al. 2020 Dec; 196(12): 1086–1093. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 40.  Brogna B, Bignardi E, Brogna C, et al.: Typical CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia in patients presenting with repetitive negative RT-PCR. Radiogr. Lond. Engl. 1995. 2021 May; 27(2): 743–747. Publisher Full Text
  • 41.  Hani C, Trieu NH, Saab I, et al.: COVID-19 pneumonia: A review of typical CT findings and differential diagnosis. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2020 May; 101(5): 263–268. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 42.  Marinella MA: Routine antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone during COVID-19: Should oncologists reconsider?. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2020 Sep; 26(6): 1482–1485. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 43.  Tasavon Gholamhoseini M, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Goudarzi R, et al.: Safety and Efficacy of Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. Publ. Can. Soc. Pharm. Sci. Soc. Can. Sci. Pharm. 2021; 24: 237–245. Publisher Full Text
  • 44.  Lin EC: Radiation Risk From Medical Imaging. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010 Dec 1; 85(12): 1142–1146. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 45.  Jones JGA, Mills CN, Mogensen MA, et al.: Radiation dose from medical imaging: a primer for emergency physicians. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2012 May; 13(2): 202–210. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 46.  Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ: Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br. J. Radiol. 2012 Dec 1; 85(1020): e1166–e1173. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 47.  Fields TR: Steroid Side Effects: How to Reduce Corticosteroid Side Effects. Hospital for Special Surgery.[cited 2021 Sep 22]. Reference Source
  • 48.  Dyer O: Covid-19: India sees record deaths as “black fungus” spreads fear. BMJ. 2021 May 13; 373: n1238. Publisher Full Text
  • 49.  Ho KS, Narasimhan B, Difabrizio L, et al.: Impact of corticosteroids in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2021 Apr; 8(1): e000766. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Jan 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (1)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
 - -
Citations
SEE MORE DETAILS
CITE
how to cite this article
Pandey SR, Adhikari Yadav S, Gautam S et al. Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74558.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 19 Jan 2022
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 08 Feb 2022
Prashant Gupta, Department of Radiology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 8
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120360
The authors have done a great job to evaluate the role of low-dose radiotherapy in the management of COVID-19 patients. However, the included studies' number is small which has underpowered this review and may have an effect on the conclusion. ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Gupta P. Reviewer Report For: Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120360)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-62/v1#referee-response-120360
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
Views
15
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Jan 2022
Ritesh Neupane, Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 15
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120357
The review attempts to look at an interesting modality of treatment possibility for COVID-19 patients: LDRT. The methods are clear and appear rigorously done. It concludes that, despite improvement in inflammatory markers, LDRT cannot be sufficiently supported due to strong ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Neupane R. Reviewer Report For: Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120357)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-62/v1#referee-response-120357
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern
  • Author Response 21 Feb 2022
    Saroj Adhikari Yadav, Patan Academy of Health Sciences School of Medicine, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
    21 Feb 2022
    Author Response
    Thank you for meticulously reviewing this manuscript and providing your review and feedback.

    Regarding the article you referenced, Kapoor et. al. published an expert opinion in the 'news and ... Continue reading
    Report a concern
  • Respond or Comment
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 21 Feb 2022
    Saroj Adhikari Yadav, Patan Academy of Health Sciences School of Medicine, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
    21 Feb 2022
    Author Response
    Thank you for meticulously reviewing this manuscript and providing your review and feedback.

    Regarding the article you referenced, Kapoor et. al. published an expert opinion in the 'news and ... Continue reading
    Report a concern
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Jan 2022
Sudeep Acharya, Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, New York, NY, USA 
Approved
VIEWS 12
https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120350
The authors have a good research question which falls within current literature. They have clearly described the methods of data collection and interpretation. This is a small study and very small population group analysed which might have resulted in underpowered ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Acharya S. Reviewer Report For: Effectiveness of low-dose radiation therapy in COVID-19 patients globally: A systematic review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:62 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.78329.r120350)
The direct URL for this report is:
https://f1000research.com/articles/11-62/v1#referee-response-120350
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Report a concern

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Jan 2022
Comment

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:

Approved
The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved
Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Reviewer Reports

Invited Reviewers
1 2 3
Version 1
19 Jan 22 		read read read
  1. Sudeep Acharya, Staten Island University Hospital, New York, USA
  2. Ritesh Neupane, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA
  3. Prashant Gupta, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment
Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports
    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.