ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: A rare presentation of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites complicated by tumor lysis syndrome

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Oncology gateway.

Abstract

Background: Only 32 cases of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and ascites have currently been reported in the literature. We present the first reported case of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites whose treatment was complicated by tumor lysis syndrome along with a literature review evaluating similar cases.
Case: We present a rare case of a 78-year-old retired Caucasian male with recurrent metastatic prostate cancer and malignant ascites. He had previously received definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer but presented with bilateral hydronephrosis and right-sided bladder wall thickening 10 years later. He had imaging evidence of locoregional recurrence with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) and was initiated on combined androgen blockade with intramuscular leuprolide and oral bicalutamide. After being transferred to Scripps Clinic, he was found to have a solitary right upper lobe pulmonary lesion for which he completed stereotactic body radiation therapy. Then, 10 months later, he developed new onset malignant ascites and was treated with two cycles of intravenous docetaxel. Treatment resulted in improvement in his ascites and reduction in PSA. Unfortunately, his course was complicated by tumor lysis syndrome, encephalopathy, Escherichia coli bacteremia, and a fatal saddle pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: (1) Occurrence of ascites in prostate cancer patients is associated with worse prognosis than non-ascitic variants. (2) More common etiologies of ascites must be evaluated for. (3) Ascitic fluid prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement may aid in diagnosis of malignant ascites in cases with diagnostic uncertainty. (4) Patients with advanced disease may benefit from combined hormonal and cytotoxic therapies. (5) Awareness of the occurrence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients treated for prostate cancer can help identify patients in whom prophylaxis would be beneficial.

Keywords

Prostate cancer, malignant ascites, tumor lysis syndrome, hemorrhagic ascites, ascites, chylous ascites, metastatic prostate cancer, castrate resistant prostate cancer

Introduction

After skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in most of the Western world. Incidence rates in the US rose through the early 1990s and have subsequently decreased, possibly in association with guidelines recommending against use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) for screening.1,2 It remains the leading cause of cancer death in American men after lung cancer and one in nine American men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime.3 While most cases are localized on presentation, up to 17% of patients may experience metastatic disease associated with increased cancer-specific mortality.4 Bone, distant lymph nodes, and abdominal organ metastases are the most common, but peritoneal carcinomatosis with concurrent malignant ascites is exceedingly rare.5 Only 32 cases of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and ascites have currently been reported in the literature (Table 1). We present the first reported case of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites whose treatment was complicated by tumor lysis syndrome along with a literature review evaluating similar cases.

Table 1. Cases of prostate cancer with ascites.

Year reportedAuthorRef.Age, yearsTime between first diagnosis and ascites*Other sites of metastasesTreatment (Pre-ascites)Treatment (Post-ascites)Response from diagnosis of ascitesOutcome
1968Rapoport et al.437616 yearsLymph nodes, direct invasion of surrounding organsOrchiectomy + DES5-FU and IP ThiotepaProgressionDeath at 3 months
1968Rapoport et al.43451 yearSeminal vesicles, bladder, and surrounding lymphaticsTotal cystectomyOrchiectomy, DESProgressionDeath in weeks to few months
1973Megalli et al.758Initial presentationδNoneDES, RTRemissionResolved ascites, alive at 6 months
1990Beigel et al.829Initial presentationβBonesPatient RefusedProgressionDeath at 1 month
1990Disdier et al.2578Initial presentationαLymph nodesNoneOrchiectomy, NilutamideRemissionDiminished ascites, survival NR
1992Catton et al.2663Initial presentationDiffuse visceral, local invasion of periprostatic tissues (on autopsy)Orchiectomy, hormonal therapyRemissionResolution of ascites for 9 months, death at 13 months
1999Saif et al.27704 yearsNone reportedRT, Leuprolide + Flutamide, Leuprolide + Bicalutamide, ThalidomideNRProgressionAlive at 2 months
1996Zhau et al.2883>1 yearLiver, bonesNROrchiectomyProgressionDeath at 12 months
2000Wynn et al.29739 yearsLymph nodes, sigmoid colonRTNoneProgressionDeath at 3 weeks
2001Tsai et al.306815 monthsαRectal wallGosrelin, FlutamideInterferon alpha-2b and toremifeneProgressionDeath at 4 months
2002Amin et al.9835 yearsβLymph nodesAntiandrogenWithdrawal of antiandrogen therapyProgressionDeath at 6 weeks
2002Kehinde et al.10764 yearsδNoneTURPOrchiectomy on recurrenceRemissionResolved ascites in 3 months, alive at 18 months
2004Appalaneni et al.16603 yearsBones, lymph nodesRT, GnRH Agonist + Antiadrogen, Mitoxantrone + PrednisoneNRProgressionDeath at 6 weeks
2004Lapoile et al.318010 yearsBone, othersRT, triptorelin, aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisoneNoneProgressionDeath at 3 months
2007Madaan et al.32753 yearsαLymph nodesGosrelinDES and ASAProgressionDeath within 4 months
2009Okouo et al.33813 yearsαBrainNoneTriptorelin, cryproteroneProgressionResolved ascites, death at 3 months
2009Zagouri et al.34755 yearsNoneGosrelin + bicalutamide, Gosrelin + estramustineDocetaxel + Estramustine, Docetaxel + prednisoneRemissionResolution of ascites, alive at 6 months
2010Benedict et al.35674 yearsNoneOrchiectomy and BicalutamideDocetaxelRemissionDiminished ascites, survival NR
2012Talwar et al.3659Initial presentationInguinal and umbilical hernia sacksLeuprolideProgressionDeath at 3 months
2013Ani et al.3757Initial presentationLymph nodes, bonesBicalutamide + GnRH agonistNRStable DiseaseStable ascites, decreased PSA, alive at 3 months
2015Petrakis et al.137616 yearsLymph nodes, bonesTURP, Bicalutamide + LeuprolideDocetaxelRemissionResolved ascites, alive at 10 months
2015Pradhan et al.3870Initial presentationBones, lymph nodesHormone therapyRemissionAscites response NR, alive at 6 weeks
2015Saini et al.11659 yearsδNoneOrchiectomy, Bicalutamide, Fosfestrol, Ketoconazole + PrednisoloneTaxotere-base chemotherapyNRNR
2016Gungor et al.39603 yearsLocally advancedRT, AntiandrogensNRNRNR
2016Papadatos et al.12693 yearsδBoneRT, Bicalutamide + TriptorelinNoneProgressionDeath at 3 weeks
2017Ladwa et al.1474NRNoneDocetaxel, AbirateroneCabazitaxelStable diseaseIncreased PSA, stable imaging, alive at 10 months
2018van Roekel et al.406515 monthsUreteralRT, Bicalutamide, Docetaxel"Palliative Therapy"ProgressionDeath at 3 weeks
2019Samankan et al.4184NRNRNRDocetaxel + EnzalutamideRemissionDiminished ascites, alive at follow up (time NR)
2019Tareen et al.17701 weekBladder, seminal vesicles, liverAborted prostatectomyBicalutamide + Leuprolide, Docetaxel, Abiraterone + Prednisone, CabazitaxelProgressionAlive at 6 months with transiently diminished symptoms, transitioned to hospice given poor functional status
2020Present caseN/A788 yearsαLung, boneLeuprolide + BicalutamideDocetaxel + BicalutamideProgressionDiminished ascites for 1 month, death at 3 months
2020Visconti et al.1577Initial presentationδBoneNoneGnRH agonist + BicalutamideRemissionPSA reduction & reduced ascites at 3 months, death NR
2021Sagar et al.4236Initial presentationBone, liver, lymph nodesNRNRNRNR
Median age, years70

* Excluding peritoneal or omental.

α Hemorrhagic ascites.

β Chylous ascites.

δ Nonmalignant cytology, non-chylous.

Literature review

We reviewed the literature including cases and postmortem studies of patients with “prostate cancer” AND “malignant ascites” through a PubMed (RRID:SCR_004846) search (human; all languages; 1968–2022; last search 10 May 2022). We performed a manual retrieval of bibliographical information of resulting papers to identify additional literature and collect information regarding age, clinical features, metastatic sites, treatments, outcomes, survival, and cause of death.

Case report

A 78-year-old retired Caucasian male patient with diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and stage IV chronic kidney disease due to obstructive uropathy was initially diagnosed with intermediate risk, T2b N0 M0, clinical stage II prostatic adenocarcinoma at another facility where he completed definitive radiotherapy in 2008. He had a 90 pack/year smoking history, which he quit in 1992. Family history was notable for prostate cancer in his paternal uncle. In 2018, a computed tomography (CT) scan of his abdomen revealed bilateral hydronephrosis and right-sided bladder wall thickening. He was found to have PSA elevated to 45 ng/ml and was initiated on combined androgen blockade with intramuscular leuprolide (22.5 mg every three months) and oral bicalutamide (50 mg daily). Cystoscopy at that time was only notable for radiation cystitis.

In March 2019, after being transferred to Scripps Clinic, he was found to have a solitary right upper lobe pulmonary lesion on positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. He completed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in June 2019, at which time his PSA level was 38.2 ng/ml. A follow up surveillance PET/CT was without evidence of active metastatic disease.

The patient was admitted to Scripps Green Hospital with severe abdominal distension and shortness of breath on 12 April 2020. Physical exam was notable for palpable fluid wave and shifting dullness consistent with new onset ascites. A therapeutic and diagnostic paracentesis yielded 3L of serosanguinous fluid with 79,000 red blood cells, albumin 1.8 g/dL, protein 3.4 g/dL, glucose 154 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 1,004 units/L, pH 7.5, polymorphonuclear cell count 184 cells/mm3, and negative gram stain, ruling out spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Serum albumin was 2.7 g/dL with a serum albumin ascites gradient (SAAG) <1, consistent with an exudative process. Ascitic fluid cytopathology revealed metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma with immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive for prostatic markers homeobox protein Nkx-3.1 (NKX3.1), ETS transcription factor ERG (ERG) and PSA (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Gastrointestinal IHC was negative for CDH17. PSA levels were elevated at 446.60 ng/mL. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast demonstrated severe peritoneal thickening, nodular omental infiltration, ascites, mildly nodular bladder wall thickening, scattered sclerotic osseous foci, and new vertebral osseous metastasis at T12 with interval development of 7.1 × 6.3 cm right cardiophrenic angle tumor (Figure 3). He had stable scattered small nonspecific abdominal mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. He required paracentesis every 24-48 hours due to rapid reaccumulation of ascites.

4a7c95af-ed37-4505-91fa-1c3f2ea8766e_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Cytology images of ascitic fluid.

Cytology of ascitic fluid demonstrating highly atypical epithelial cells with somewhat vacuolated cytoplasm, pleomorphic nuclei, and mitotic figures in a background of necrosis and acute inflammation on H&E stain (left) with immunohistochemistry demonstrating positive PSA (right) staining (400×). PSA, prostate specific antigen.

4a7c95af-ed37-4505-91fa-1c3f2ea8766e_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry of ascitic fluid demonstrating positive NKX3.1 (left) and ERG (right) staining (400×).

4a7c95af-ed37-4505-91fa-1c3f2ea8766e_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Patient imaging.

(A) CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast showing severe peritoneal thickening with nodular omental deposits (arrows). (B) Heterogeneity of bone density with scattered sclerotic foci and ill-defined sclerotic lesion of T12 vertebral body (arrow). (C) Bulky soft tissue tumor at the right cardiophrenic angle measuring approximately 7.1 × 6.3 cm transversely (circle) with ascites (arrow). (D) Asymmetric and mildly nodular right greater than left bladder wall thickening (arrows). CT, computed tomography.

He was initiated on intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 21 days per the androgen ablation therapy vs. combined chemo-hormonal therapy trial for metastatic prostate cancer (CHAARTED) trial.6 Five days later, he developed worsening renal insufficiency secondary to known bilateral hydronephrosis and nephrostomy tubes were placed. Further laboratory workup showed an elevated uric acid (20.6 ng/dL), potassium (5.8 nmol/L), and phosphorus (12.1mg/dL), consistent with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). He received three hemodialysis sessions with improvement in renal function and was transferred to a skilled nursing facility. He had intermittent improvement in his ascites and did not require therapeutic paracentesis for one month. Cycle two of docetaxel was reduced to 37.5 mg/m2 due to renal insufficiency and fatigue with cycle one. Serum PSA decreased from 446.60 ng/mL to 43.79 ng/ml after two cycles. Unfortunately, he was readmitted on 3 July 2020 for rapidly reaccumulating ascites and encephalopathy, he was then subsequently found to have Escherichia coli bacteremia with acute kidney injury. He eventually expired from obstructive shock due to massive saddle pulmonary embolism during this admission.

Results

Based on our literature review, we describe the 32nd case of prostate cancer with peritoneal metastasis and ascites, and only the 29th case with malignant ascites (Table 1). Of these cases, only four others had hemorrhagic ascites. Six cases (18.8%) were associated with ascites with negative cytology and two of these patients had chylous ascites.712 A total of 10 patients (31.2%) achieved documented disease remission with two patients surviving for at least six weeks and five surviving for ≥ six months, four of whom survived at least 10 months in remission.10,1214 Survival was not reported in four cases. A diagnosis of malignant ascites in two of these cases was made purely based on ascitic PSA elevated above serum PSA levels despite negative cytology.12,15 Elevated ascitic PSA in one case prompted clinicians to repeat a paracentesis, which eventually yielded malignant cytology.16 Time from initial diagnosis of cancer to development of ascites typically ranged from 1-16 years. Ascites occurred one week after aborted prostatectomy in one case, though imaging suggested peritoneal deposits before this.17 There was a documented response of ascites in 14 cases (43.8%), remaining stable in two (6.3%), diminishing in five (14.3%), and resolving in six (18.8%) with remission. Ascites diminished at least transiently in two cases of disease progression, including our own. Responses after development of ascites were elicited by surgical or chemical castration in six cases (18.8%), cytotoxic therapy in four cases (12.4%), and combined therapy in five cases. Ascites was the initial presentation of disease in nine cases (28.1%), occurred late in 20 (62.5%), was not reported in two, and occurred one week after aborted prostatectomy in one case (Table 2). The median age at which ascites presented was 70 years old.

Table 2. Features of ascites in patients with prostatic peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Number of cases
Ascites characteristics (if atypical)Negative cytology
Chylous2
Non-chylous3
Non-chylous, elevated PSA2
Positive cytologyHemorrhagic5
Ascites response to treatment*If remission achievedStable2
Diminished5
Resolved6
Not reported
If disease progressed2§
Response not reported1
Total17
Therapy used to elicit response*Castration6
Cytotoxic4
Combined5
Total15
Time at which ascites presented from initial diagnosisInitial presentation9
Early (<1 year)1
Late (≥1 year)20
Not reported2
Total32

* If ascites remained stable, diminished, or resolved.

§ Initially diminished but recurred.

Discussion

In a large population-based analysis by Gandaglia et al., the most common sites of metastasis in prostate cancer were bone (84%), distant lymph nodes (10.6%), liver (10.2%), thorax (9.1%), brain (3.1%) and digestive tract (2.7%).5 Peritoneal and omental metastasis are exceedingly rare with associated ascites being even less common. In determining the pathophysiology of malignant dissemination, Paget first described the “seed and soil” hypothesis, in which cancer cells (seeds) migrate to secondary sites (soil) based on local factors contributing to the proclivity of cell migration.18 Mechanisms of metastasis in prostate cancer have been studied in most detail in osseous disease and describe interactions between chemokines like C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) in bone and chemokine receptors type four and seven (CXCR4, CXCR7) in migration of tumor cells. Other receptors such as annexin II, integrin αvβ3, and receptor-ligand pairs like Notch-Jagged have also been implicated in osseous metastasis.19 While the chylous and transudative nature of fluid in three of these cases suggests ascites was due to lymphangitic carcinomatosis or obstruction, exudative fluid with detectable malignant cells in most other cases suggests lymphangitic carcinomatosis or invasion of the mesothelial peritoneal lining.89,16 It has also been hypothesized that robotic-assisted resections have led to port-site metastasis, though not always with concurrent malignant ascites.20,21

In addition to the rarity of our patient’s metastatic spread, we also describe the first documented case of TLS in a patient with prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites. TLS is extremely rare in solid tumors, particularly prostate cancer, with only 11 cases reported as of January 2020.22,23 A total of 10 of these cases notably had widespread metastatic disease, typically with extensive bone and liver involvement, though our patient had only a single known vertebral metastasis with few other small, scattered foci of osseous involvement without liver involvement.

Baeksgaard and Sorenson note that the mortality rate of TLS in solid tumor malignancies is significantly higher than in hematological malignancies, further highlighting the importance of early clinical recognition or potential prophylaxis for TLS in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.24

Strengths of our paper include construction of the first comprehensive table of cases of prostate cancer and malignant ascites as well as the characteristics of such cases gained from literature review in all languages (Tables 1 and 2). Furthermore, we describe one of the few known cases of TLS in a patient with prostate cancer. Our conclusions are limited by the inability to make causal inferences regarding the pathogenesis of ascites in all cases, given the retrospective nature of our review.

Conclusions

Our case and review of the literature suggest that (1) the occurrence of ascites in patients with prostate cancer is typically associated with a worse prognosis than non-ascitic variants. (2) More common etiologies of ascites, including other primary malignancy must be evaluated for. (3) Ascitic fluid PSA measurement may aid in the diagnosis of malignant ascites in cases with negative fluid cytology and diagnostic uncertainty. (4) Carefully selected patients with advanced disease may achieve palliative benefit from combined hormonal and cytotoxic therapies. (5) Awareness of the occurrence of TLS in patients treated for prostate cancer or with ascites may help raise clinical suspicion and identify patients in whom prophylaxis would be beneficial.

Data availability

Underlying data

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the daughter of the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Venkateswaran AR, Elzein SF, Sulpizio ED et al. Case Report: A rare presentation of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites complicated by tumor lysis syndrome [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:957 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121639.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 06 Oct 2023
Tomislav Omrčen, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 4
The authors present a case report including patient with a rare presentation of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites complicated by tumor lysis syndrome. They also reviewed literature with patients with prostate cancer and ascites. The introduction, case ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Omrčen T. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: A rare presentation of prostate cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and malignant ascites complicated by tumor lysis syndrome [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2022, 11:957 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.133526.r208067)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Aug 2022
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.