Keywords
amniotic fluid, antibiotics, demography, gestation, hospitalization
amniotic fluid, antibiotics, demography, gestation, hospitalization
Neonatal sepsis is an important etiology of neonatal mortality and morbidity. The global incidence of neonatal infection in a study was 7.3 per 1000 live births.1 At national level, 16% of total perinatal death was because of neonatal sepsis in Nepal.2 The common organism of neonatal sepsis are Group B Streptococci, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus sp, Enterococci, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas.3 The responsible major factors associated with early-onset neonatal sepsis are foul-smelling amniotic fluid, premature rupture of membrane, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, prematurity (<37 weeks gestation), low birth weight(<2.5kg), low Apgar score (<7)4 and mode of deliveries. The risk factors for late onset neonatal sepsis are invasive mechanical ventilation, intravascular catheterization, delay of early enteral feeding with breast milk, prolonged parenteral nutrition, cardio-pulmonary diseases, and hospital admission.5 The beta-lactam antibiotic combined with an aminoglycoside are mainstay of the treatment of neonatal sepsis. However, cephalosporin (cefotaxime) and a glycopeptide (vancomycin) have been frequently used to treat late-onset sepsis.6 The aim of this study is to find the incidence and risk factors associated with culture-positive neonatal sepsis, and common bacterial agents responsible for it.
The Institutional Review Committee (IRC), Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal provided ethical clearance in September 2022 with reference no 669/2022 after submitting the proposal letter beforehand. A proper parental informed written consenting process was followed before the study began via a validated proforma. The consent was also taken regarding their case notes to be used for the study purpose. Those who refused were excluded from the study. The study began with face-to-face interviews that lasted approximately 10 to 15 minutes.
Patients were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.
The methods used for data collection was a questionnaire,27 which was completed via face to face interviews and case notes available from record section of the hospital. This hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from July 2021 to July 2022 at Narayani Central Hospital in Birgunj, Nepal. The data collection was performed in September 2022 after ethical clearance was obtained.
Narayani Central Hospital is one of the tertiary-level central government hospitals running under the Ministry of Health and Population of Nepal, with a total of 200 beds. The hospital lies in Parsa, the southern part of Nepal, bordering India. The hospital is a referral center for the population from province number two as well as the Bihar state of India. It provides many specialist services in addition to general health services. The pediatric department reports a high number of neonatal sepsis cases per month (n = 26 on average).
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were strictly followed during the study.28
A minimum sample of 380 samples were calculated considering an infinite population proportion of neonatal sepsis (44.96%) based on a previous study.7 However, we included 385 samples meeting the selection criteria for the study.
The detailed calculation is the following:
wheren = required sample size
z = 1.96 at alpha 5% level of significance
p = prevalence = 0.11; q (compliment of prevalence) = 0.89
E = allowable error, 5%
After ethical clearance from IRC of the Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, the study began by reviewing hospital records from the Department of Pediatrics, Narayani Hospital, and the record section of the hospital. A proper parental consent process was followed before commencement of study proper via a validated proforma. We selected 385 neonates with sepsis through convenience sampling methods from all cases admitted to NICU from July 2021 to July 2022. All newborns born and admitted to NICU from July 2021 to July 2022 were included. Cases with incomplete data and ambiguous information were excluded.
The sample cases were selected via convenient type of sampling methods. All suspected, as well as culture-positive neonatal sepsis cases were included in the study. A clinically suspected neonatal sepsis is defined as a positive septic screen but no growth within 72 hours of culture. The demography section of the questionnaire comprises both qualitative and quantitative data such as the mother’s name, age, sex, and address. These were recorded carefully in the questionnaire during interview processes. Similarly, different maternal risk factors (such as mode of delivery, premature rupture of membrane, foul-smelling amniotic fluid) and neonatal risk factors (such as weight, prematurity) were recorded in the questionnaire from the clinical case notes. The types of different bacterial growth with corresponding drug sensitivity were also recorded.
The collected data26 were entered and analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS), IBM SPSS® version 22. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, ranges, and standard deviations were used to express the statistics. An appropriate graph/chart was used to represent the study results. A multivariate regression analysis tool was applied for the risk association of different above-mentioned clinical risk factors with neonatal sepsis. For binary logistic regression analysis, odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were calculated, and significance was established at 5% level.
Our study revealed 2.79 kg±0.55 kg as the mean birthweight of neonates (Table 1). Likewise, the mean age of neonates who participated in the study at the time of neonatal sepsis diagnosis was 6.19 days with a standard deviation of 3.87 days. The neonates had an average gestational age of 37.64±1.27 weeks at the delivery time. Among 385 participants, more than half 225 (58.4%) were male, and the remaining were female.
Mean/Range | Standard deviation | |
---|---|---|
Age (Days) | 6.19/ (1–28) | 3.87 |
Birth weight (kg) | 2.79/ (1.6–4.5) | 0.55 |
Gestational Age (Weeks) | 37.64/ (31–41) | 1.27 |
Male | n=225(58.4%) | |
Female | n=160(41.6%) |
Moreover, neonates with a weight less than 2500 g (low Birth weight, LBW) were 107 (27.8%) (Table 2). Only 8.3% (32) neonates were born prematurely (<37 weeks). Premature rupture of membrane was reported in 11.4% of mothers. The record showed only 28 mothers had foul-smelling amniotic fluid at the time of delivery. Most women had a normal vaginal delivery (222, 57.7%) followed by cesarean section (153, 39.7%).
Most of the neonatal sepsis diagnoses were clinically diagnosed (283, 73.5%) (Table 3). The remaining cases (102, 26.5%) were culture-positive neonatal sepsis.
Frequencies (n) | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Clinically diagnosed | 283 | 73.5 |
Culture positive | 102 | 26.5 |
Total | 385 | 100.0 |
According to chronology (Table 4), late neonatal sepsis was the predominant diagnosis (85.5%. 329).
Frequencies (n) | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Early (<72 hours) | 56 | 14.5 |
Late (>72 hours) | 329 | 85.5 |
Total | 385 | 100.0 |
Out of 102 culture-positive neonatal sepsis, Staph aureus was found to be the predominant pathogen (40, 39.2%) in culture isolates followed by Klebsiella (25, 24.5%) and Acinetobacter (16, 15.7%) (Table 5).
Types of bacteria | Frequencies (n) | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Klebsiella | 25 | 24.5 |
2 | Acinetobacter | 16 | 15.7 |
3 | Staph Aureus | 40 | 39.2 |
4 | Escherichia coli | 8 | 7.8 |
5 | Pseudomonas | 7 | 6.9 |
6 | Enterobacter | 6 | 5.9 |
There is a statistically significant association between culture-positive neonatal sepsis and prematurity and foul-smelling amniotic fluid. While association with gender, types of neonatal sepsis (early or late), low birth weight, prematurity, and mode of delivery were insignificant. The premature rupture of membrane was four times more likely to have associations with culture-positive neonatal sepsis (OR=4.32, 95% CI: 2.20–8.47). Similarly, mothers with foul-smelling amniotic fluid were three times more likely to have culture-positive neonatal sepsis (OR=3.03, 95% CI: 1.32–6.92) (Table 6).
Serial number | Risk factors | Bacterial growth? | Binary logistic regression | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No (n) | Yes (n) | OR (odd ratio) | Confidence interval | |||
1. | Sex | |||||
Male | 166 | 59 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 1.39 | |
Female | 117 | 43 | 1 Ref | |||
2. | Neonatal sepsis types | |||||
Early (<72 hours) | 45 | 11 | 1 Ref | |||
Late (>72 hours) | 238 | 91 | 1.564 | 0.775 | 3.156 | |
3. | LBW (Low birth weight)a | |||||
No | 200 | 78 | 1 Ref | |||
Yes | 83 | 24 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 1.33 | |
4. | Prematurity | |||||
No | 259 | 94 | 1 Ref | |||
Yes | 24 | 8 | 0.81 | 0.34 | 1.93 | |
5. | PROM (Premature rupture of membrane)b | |||||
No | 264 | 77 | 1 Ref | |||
Yes | 19 | 25 | 4.32 | 2.20 | 8.47 | |
6. | Foul smelling amniotic fluid | |||||
No | 270 | 87 | 1 Ref | |||
Yes | 13 | 15 | 3.03 | 1.32 | 6.92 | |
7. | Mode of delivery | |||||
Normal vaginal | 167 | 55 | 1 Ref | |||
Cesarean delivery | 107 | 46 | 1.22 | 0.75 | 1.99 | |
Assisted vaginal delivery | 9 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 2.27 |
The incidence of culture-positive neonatal sepsis was low in our study (26.5%). The results were close to a study done in Ethiopia (29.3%)8 and Tamil Nadu, India (26.2%).9 A study based in Nepali, showed 42.7% of cases were blood culture positive and 57.3% (110 cases) had culture-negative but clinically suspected neonatal sepsis with features of sepsis.10 The late type neonatal sepsis was major category in our study and about four times the early type of neonatal sepsis (73.5%). The findings are similar to a study in Australia where an incidence of early-onset and late onset neonatal sepsis was 0.51% and 1.3% per 1000 live births (2.5 times that of early neonatal sepsis).11 This may partly be due to the high prevalence of risk factors associated with late neonatal sepsis. At a global level, the early onset type is 2.6 times more common with respect to late-onset neonatal sepsis according to a study in a systematic review and meta-analysis.12 The bacterial spectrum demonstrated Staphylococcus aureus as a common pathogen to cause neonatal sepsis followed by Klebsiella. The results are different in other similar studies. Similar studies found Escherichia coli and Streptococcus agalactiae were the most frequent organisms associated with early-onset neonatal sepsis whereas Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (co-NS) was the main culprit of late-onset neonatal sepsis.13 Similarly, a Nepali hospital based study found Klebsiella pneumoniae (34%) and Enterobacter spp. (25%) as the most common bacterial isolates.14 A study concluded that Escherichia coli was the predominant organism in both early-onset and late-onset type neonatal sepsis, however, Staphylococcus aureus was common in late-onset sepsis.15 A hospital study done in Saudi Arabia reported that the proportion of neonatal sepsis (clinical and culture positive) was almost equivalent in both males (52%) and females (48%).16 However, males had a slightly higher association (59%) with culture-positive sepsis in our study. The current study demonstrated that late-onset neonatal sepsis is nine times more associated with culture-positive sepsis. The above findings are supported by a Myanmar based study that concluded that neonates with late-onset sepsis (LOS) were more probable to have bacteriologically confirmed sepsis (45%) versus early onset sepsis (38%) (aPR: 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1–1.4)).17 But in a similar study, positive blood culture was found in equal proportion in early (47.1%) and late-onset (51.4%) neonatal sepsis respectively.18 As per our study, neonates with low birth weight constitute 23.5% of culture-positive neonatal sepsis. Furthermore, prematurity was present in 7.8% of all culture-positive neonatal sepsis. A similar study based in USA, concluded that the incidence of sepsis is significantly higher in premature infants, as well as those with very low birth weight (<1000 grams).19 The current study also showed normal vaginal and cesarean delivery modes were equally prevalent in culture-positive sepsis. A study completed in Nepal revealed the highest incidence of positive bacterial growth in male newborns (52.3%); 72 hours or more age (71.2%); low birth weight (62.7%); preterm (31.4%); and post cesarean cases (63.3%).10 Our study has demonstrated a statistically significant association between premature rupture of membrane (PROM) and foul-smelling amniotic fluid with culture positive type neonatal sepsis. A significant association was seen between blood culture positivity with foul-smelling amniotic fluid (p = 0.025), PROM (p = 0.016), birth asphyxia, and low birth weight (p = 0.003) in other similar studies.20 A hospital based study showed neonatal sepsis was present in 2.7% of mothers who had early rupture on membranes.21 Similarly, in a study done in B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS) institute, PROM, meconium-stained and foul-smelling amniotic fluid, low birth weight, prematurity, and low Apgar score were significant risk factors leading to neonatal sepsis.22 Another study established an association of early type Neonatal Sepsis with PROM, foul-smelling amniotic fluid, traditional midwife handling, and maternal urinary tract infection (p < 0.05).23 The major perinatal factors for neonatal sepsis in a similar study were prolonged labor, PROM, maternal pyrexia within 2 weeks (>38°C), foul-smelling amniotic fluid (13%), low apgar score (20%) and unhygienic or >3 sterile per vaginal examinations.24 A meta-analysis and systemic review study based in India, found that male sex, outborn neonates, mechanical ventilation, prematurity, and PROM as significant clinical factors for neonatal sepsis.25
Neonatal sepsis is prevalent mostly in an underdeveloped countries like Nepal. The contributing factors for the high burden of neonatal sepsis are premature rupture of membrane, foul-smelling amniotic fluid, prematurity, and low birth weight, unhygienic home delivery practices. Addressing the factors above, the incidence and its impact can be avoided dramatically. The role of pediatricians, nurses, hospital administrations and general awareness among mothers about hygienic practices during parturition is essential to minimize overall neonatal mortality and morbidity.
Parents’ written informed consent was received after full explanation of research purposes and processes.
Figshare: Data neonatal sepsis. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21505314. 26
This project contains the following underlying data:
Figshare: Questionnaire neonatal sepsis. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21304599. 27
The project contains the following extended data:
Figshare: STROBE checklist for “Effect of clinical risk factors on bacteriological profile in neonatal sepsis: A descriptive cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center, Nepal”. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22353955. 28
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the hospital record section and the staff working at the NICU department of Narayani Hospital for supporting us to conduct this research work.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
No
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Neonatology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
No source data required
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Clinical bacteriology, anaerobic bacteriology, antimicrobial resistance and stewardship, infection prevention and control
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 25 Sep 23 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)