Keywords
Brandwein-Gensler criteria, worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, perineural invasion, p53, immunohistochemistry, OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma
This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.
The commonest type of malignancy in the head and neck region is oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Brandwein provided a risk model that includes scores for the following three factors: worst invasion pattern, lymphocytic host response and perineural invasion. This risk model accounts for overall survival and local recurrence. p53 is considered to be one of the most significant prognostic markers.
To assess and correlate Brandwein-Gensler criteria with p53 immunoexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
In this study, a total of 80 samples will be included from histopathologically diagnosed OSCC patients will be taken for the study. H&E-stained slides of all cases will be evaluated using Brandwein-Gensler criteria and then immunostaining will be done for p53 immunoexpression. A correlation between Brandwein-Gensler criteria and p53 immunoexpression will be determined.
The present study will assess and correlate Brandwein-Gensler criteria with p53 immunoexpression. If the Brandwein-Gensler criteria score increases, the intensity of p53 immunoexpression will also increase.
We hypothesize that Brandwein-Gensler criteria may be significantly correlated with p53 immunoexpression in OSCC.
Brandwein-Gensler criteria, worst pattern of invasion, lymphocytic host response, perineural invasion, p53, immunohistochemistry, OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma
Rephrasing is done using P53 with the Brandwein-Gensler risk model.
Objectives of the study have changed as suggested, the correlation between the p53 and Brandwein Gensler is done, and with overall survival.
In the protocol, inclusion and exclusion criteria are elaborated, and the formula for the sample size is removed.
In the intervention, data is selected based on a simple random selection method, and all the grammatical mistakes are corrected.
The perineural invasion is for every nerve like for smaller and larger nerves.
The nerves with less than 5 mm diameter are the smaller nerves and those with a diameter larger than 5mm are the larger nerve.
The outcomes of the study are removed.
In immunostaining, the whole paragraph is rephrased.
In case of Discussion, the immunohistochemical term is replaced with immunohistochemistry word.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Namrah Anwar and QurratulAin Chundriger
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nilotpal Chowdhury
The commonest type of malignancy in the head and neck region is oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). It is also one of the top 10 malignancies in the world.1 The median survival for OSCC, which is less than 50% in five years, has improved very little despite recent improvements in treatment methods.2 The main reason for death in people with OSCC is loco-regional recurrence. Many factors, including the size of tumor, its grade, the negative resection margin, lymph node metastases, perineural invasion, etc., have an effect on local recurrence and survival. Brandwein provided a risk model that includes scores for the following three factors: worst invasion pattern (WPI), lymphocytic host response (LHR) and perineural invasion (PNI). This risk model accounts for overall survival and local recurrence.3 Low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories are determined by adding these scores.3
When neoplastic cells enter tissues at the tumor/host contact, this is referred to as having the worst pattern of invasion.4 The WPI is notably related to poor prognosis, metastases of the lymph nodes, and loco-regional recurrence rates.5 In the risk model, lymphocyte density at the tumour interface serves as a histological measure of the LHR. Strong, intermediate, or weak are the three categories.6 PNI is the development of cancerous cells inside one of the three layers of a nerve structure or the existence of tumour foci outside of the nerve that cover more than one-third of the nerve’s circumference.7 PNI has been labelled as an OSCC parameter with a high level of risk.7 PNI is additionally referred to as a predictor of survival and local recurrence.5
In the Brandwein-Gensler risk model, WPI with type 4 and 5 scores shows scattered neoplastic cells, which are masked by marked chronic inflammatory cells and are difficult to identify. p53 is considered to be one of the most significant prognostic markers.2 p53 is a protein present in the nucleus of epithelial cells produced by a tumor suppressor gene known as TP53. It regulates cell division and apoptosis.8 p53 overexpression in OSCC is thought to be a sign of poor prognosis.2 In this study, we determine if there is a correlation between the Brandwein-Gensler criteria and p53 immunoexpression in OSCC.
This is a retrospective cohort study, which will be carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra. Ethical approval was provided by the Institutional Ethical Committee, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha.
IEC reference number: DMIHER (DU)/IEC/2023/840. Date: 31/03/2023.
Inclusion criteria
• Samples of OSCC that have been surgically treated and that have been clinically and histopathologically diagnosed will be included in this study.
• Follow-up data will be assessed for 4–5 years of disease-free survival.
Exclusion criteria
In this retrospective study, a total of 80 previously unused, randomly selected samples of histopathologically diagnosed OSCC from 2019 to 2022 will be retrieved from the archives of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital in the form of paraffin blocks. Blocks will be cut and tissue sections will be taken on slides. Slides will be deparaffinized and rehydrated in distilled water. Mayers Hematoxylin staining will be carried out for one minute. The slides will be washed 4–5 times with tap water or until the stain has been removed. Counterstain for one minute in alcohol-eosin without rinsing. Dehydrate by going through three 95% EtOH changes and two 100% EtOH changes, each lasting one minute. Clear in three Xylene changes, lasting one minute each. Then mounting will be done. After processing and staining with H & E stain, slides will be evaluated under a microscope (OLYMPUS- CX21iFS1) to assess Brandwein-Gensler criteria (WPI, LHR and PNI). After evaluation of Brandwein-Gensler criteria, the cases will be studied for immunohistochemical expression of p53. This will be carried out by AJCC’s criteria and Worst pattern of invasion, perineural invasion and lymphocytic hot response will be evaluated. Brown nuclear staining in the cell will be examined for p53 immunoexpression and will be evaluated as per the following criteria: No staining (0), light staining (1+), medium staining (2+), and heavy staining (3+).2 A focal positive is defined as less than 10% of tumor cells, which are intermediate to weakly stained, whereas a positive is defined as more than 10% of cancer cells, which are moderate to strongly stained.2
The risk scoring system is adapted from Ref. 3. The effectiveness of the Brandwein Gensler Risk Model, which combines three significant pathological variables, in forecasting the course of surgically treated OSCC, will be examined in this study. Worst invasion pattern, perineural invasion, and lymphocytic host response are these pathogenic variables.
In worst pattern of invasion:
• Type 1 shows “pushing border” (Score 0)
• Type 2 shows “finger-like growth” (Score 0)
• Type 3 shows “large, distinct islands, each with more than 15 cells” (Score 0)
• Type 4 shows “15 or fewer cells per small tumour island” (Score +1)
• Type 5 shows “satellites of the tumour that are 20 times or more distant from the primary tumour, or that are at least 1 mm away” (Score +3)
In lymphocytic host response:
• Type 1 strong: “Each 4x field has a dense, full host response that surrounds the tumour lymphoid nodules at the advancing edge” (Score 0)
• Type 2 intermediate: “Moderate host response; some 4x fields have lymphoid nodules but not all of them” (Score +1)
• Type 3 weak: “No lymphoid nodule or a minimal host response” (Score +3)
In perineural invasion:
• Small nerves: “0.2 mm tumour looping around nerves” (Score +1)
• Large nerves: “A tumour with a diameter of at least one millimetre that wraps around nerves” (20×) (Score +3)
Evaluation of risk for oral squamous cell carcinoma5:
• In lymphocytic infiltrate at interface, continuous band has scored 0, large patches are scored 1 and little or none are scored 3.
• WPI at interface, with point 1 or 2 or 3 will have scoring of 0, with point 4 will be scored 1 and with point 5 will be scored 3.
• Perineural invasion, no invasion will be scored 0, small nerves present will be scored 1 and large nerve invasion will be scored 3.
The DO-7 clone of the DAKO anti-human p53 protein and the DAKO EnVision method will be used for p53 immunohistochemistry. Blocks of paraffin-embedded tissue (fixed with formalin) will be divided into 4 mm thick tissue slices using a microtome. The tissue slices will be placed on “3-amino propyl triethoxy silane” (APES) glass slides. Slides should be deparaffinized in two 5-minute cycles of xylene or a xylene replacement. Slides should be transferred to 100% alcohol, changed twice for three minutes each, and then once through 95% alcohol for three minutes. For ten minutes, incubate slices in a 3% H2O2 solution in methanol to inhibit endogenous peroxidase activity. To perform antigen retrieval, the slides will be cooked in TRIS-EDTA for five minutes in a pressure cooker.
Endogenous peroxidase activity will be inhibited for ten minutes with 3% hydrogen peroxide. The UV block reagent will be applied to the slides for a duration of five minutes. Slides were incubated for one hour at room temperature (DO-1) with mouse monoclonal anti-p53 primary antibody (PAb 240), which is BSA-free (PathnSitu). Horse radish peroxidase will be utilized for 30 minutes after the secondary antibody. Three′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride will be the substrate chromogen used for staining, and Harris Hematoxylin will be used for counterstaining. The sections will be dehydrated, cleaned, mounted, and then examined under an Olympus CX21iFS1 microscope.
Both quantitatively and subjectively, nuclear staining for p53 is assessed. p53 immunoexpression will be evaluated as per following criteria: Absence of staining (0), light staining (1+), medium staining (2+), and heavy staining (3+) present.2 A focal positive is defined as less than 10% of tumor cells which are intermediate to weakly stained, whereas a positive is defined as more than 10% of cancer cells which are moderate to strongly stained.
An author studied lymph node metastasis, recurrence/progression of illness, and histological risk assessment/scoring system in fifty patients with OSCC and two years of follow-up data were obtained. They concluded that in OSCC patients, individual features, WPI and PNI were notable prognostic factors.1
Another study was conducted on the clinical and prognostic importance of immunohistochemical p53 overexpression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In 121 cases of OSCC, they sought to assess immunohistochemical overexpression of p53 and its relationships to various clinicopathologic characteristics and survival. They arrived at the conclusion that extranodal extension, higher tumour grades (grades II and III), and p53 intensity of expression are significantly correlated with extranodal extension in head and neck OSCC.2
A study of OSCC patients from North India validated the Brandwein-Gensler risk model. Patients who were at least 18 years old underwent primary surgical resection for OSCC with a histological diagnosis were included in this study. After the initial surgery, the OSCC locoregional recurrences could be predicted using the Brandwein Gensler risk model. It can be used to develop plans for stopping recurrences or spotting them early enough for treatment.3
Written informed consent for publication of the patients’ details has been obtained from the patients.
Zenodo: STROBE checklist for ‘Protocol for assessment and correlation of Brandwein-Gensler criteria with P53 immunoexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study’, https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7871170.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0)
We would like to thank Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, our seniors and our colleagues.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Oral Squamous Cell carcinoma and its histopathological and molecular aspects.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Oral Squamous Cell carcinoma and its histopathological and molecular aspects.
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Yes
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Bellizzi AM: p53 as Exemplar Next-Generation Immunohistochemical Marker: A Molecularly Informed, Pattern-Based Approach, Methodological Considerations, and Pan-Cancer Diagnostic Applications.Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2023; 31 (7): 507-530 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Histopathology, cytopathology, molecular pathology
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
No
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Oral cancer, Oncology, Oral Pathology, Pathology lab administration, Quality of Life
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 2 (revision) 17 Jun 24 |
read | ||
Version 1 28 Sep 23 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)