Keywords
INFERTILITY, TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIAGNOSIS
This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.
Infertility has an increased incidence in today’s world. It hurts both the psychological and physical aspects of a person. In order to tackle this issue, it is necessary to know the cause of infertility. Transvaginal ultrasound is an accurate, cost-effective, and rapid method for diagnosing the causes of infertility, which can reduce the need for invasive procedures like hysteroscopy. The main aim of this study is to describe the role of transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing various causes of female infertility.
INFERTILITY, TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIAGNOSIS
We sincerely thank the reviewer for their detailed and constructive feedback, which has significantly improved the clarity and rigor of our study protocol titled “The role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of female infertility.”
In response, we have thoroughly revised the manuscript. We have corrected the inaccurate description of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), acknowledging it as a well-established diagnostic tool in gynecology. The rationale has been strengthened to emphasize the need for validating TVUS accuracy in diverse regional populations, with specific comparisons to gold-standard investigations such as HSG and laparoscopy.
Our research question has been reframed using the PICO format, and objectives have been clearly defined with measurable outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with fertility outcomes. We now explicitly describe the comparator methods and reference standards for evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Sample size calculations have been updated using accurate prevalence data and specify the statistical software to be used (SPSS). Additionally, male factor infertility has been added to the exclusion criteria to ensure population homogeneity.
We have ensured that all references are now accessible via DOIs or hyperlinks and will be formatted according to F1000 requirements. We hope these comprehensive revisions address the reviewer’s concerns and meet the standards of scientific rigor and transparency expected for publication.
To read any peer review reports and author responses for this article, follow the "read" links in the Open Peer Review table.
Infertility is the inability to conceive after one year of unprotected intercourse. Approximately 15.5% of women globally are afflicted with infertility.1 In India, the prevalence ranges from 3.9 to 16.8% (according to the Government website). The standard workup for female infertility includes assessing ovarian reserve, tubal and uterine examination, hormonal issues such as thyroid disorders and prolactin abnormalities, and confirmation of polycystic ovarian syndrome/disorder (PCOS).2
Female infertility causes are difficult to pinpoint. Although there are numerous therapies available, the treatment will be determined based on the cause of infertility. The most significant gains in assisted reproductive technology (ART) have resulted from advancements in pelvic structure evaluation tools.3 Infertility evaluation necessitates histopathological testing as well as visualization using several imaging modalities. There are many causes of infertility, including ovarian (such as ovarian dysgenesis or agenesis, premature ovarian failure, oophoritis, chocolate cyst, and polycystic ovarian syndrome), uterine (such as fibroid, adenomyosis, mullerian duct anomalies, endometrial polyp, endometriosis, endometritis, and intra-uterine adhesions caused by infectious causes such as tuberculosis), cervical aetiology (such as cervical stenosis), tubal aetiology (such as tubal occlusion, hydrosalpinx, pelvic inflammatory illness, and endometriosis).4
Because it is inexpensive, convenient, and gives basic information about the morphology of the uterus, cervix, endometrium, adnexa, and ovaries, ultrasound is the chosen initial modality of study for evaluating possible causes of female infertility.5
Transvaginal sonography (TVUS) is a well-established and widely adopted diagnostic tool in gynecological imaging. It offers high-resolution visualization of pelvic organs and is considered the first-line modality for assessing uterine morphology, endometrial pattern, ovarian structure, and adnexal pathology. The clinical value of TVUS has been demonstrated across numerous studies dating back over three decades (e.g., Gratton et al., 1990; Ubaldi et al., 1998). A high-frequency transducer is implanted endovaginally to evaluate pelvic organs in detail. But other investigations are needed to confirm TVS’s role and to know how accurate it is in diagnosing various causes of primary and secondary infertility.5
However, the heterogeneity of infertility causes in diverse populations and the evolving application of sonographic parameters (such as ovarian stromal assessment, AFC, and Doppler indices) suggest that re-evaluation of TVUS’s diagnostic performance in specific regional contexts remains relevant, particularly when compared against gold-standard methods like hysterosalpingography (HSG) or diagnostic laparoscopy.
This study aims to quantify the diagnostic performance of TVUS in detecting common causes of female infertility, using established reference standards. By comparing TVUS findings with results from secondary confirmatory methods (e.g., HSG, laparoscopy, and hormonal assays), we aim to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and correlation with clinical fertility outcomes.
• Population: Women aged 20–40 years presenting with primary or secondary infertility.
• Intervention: Transvaginal sonography.
• Comparator: HSG, diagnostic laparoscopy, hormonal profile, semen analysis for male exclusion.
• Outcome: Diagnostic accuracy of TVUS (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) in identifying ovarian, uterine, and tubal abnormalities.
This study aims to describe the role of transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing various causes of female infertility.
• To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of TVUS in detecting structural and functional causes of female infertility, using appropriate reference standards.
• To assess specific sonographic parameters (e.g., AFC, endometrial thickness, ovarian morphology, Doppler flow) and their correlation with fertility outcomes (e.g., conception within 6 months).
• To compare the diagnostic performance of TVUS with other diagnostic modalities (e.g., HSG for tubal patency; laparoscopy for endometriosis) in a sub-cohort.
• To describe the prevalence and distribution of infertility causes in the study population.
The institute will begin data collection after the project has been ethically cleared.
Once a patient passes the eligibility requirements for the study, the process will be described to them, and a written agreement will be obtained.
A female attendant/nurse will be present throughout the process.
Proper sanitary conditions will be maintained – Gloves will be worn by the health professionals, and a condom will be used to cover the transvaginal probe.
Before the scan, the patient will be instructed to empty her bladder, and she will be scanned in the lithotomy position. TVS is performed with a 5-12 MHz endovaginal probe on ALOKA HITACHI ARIETTA S-70 and WIPRO GE LOGIQ P5 PRO ultrasound equipment during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (the 5th-13th day following menstruation).
The TVS probe will first be covered with ultrasound gel, then with a condom, and finally with ultrasound gel again over the covered transducer. A female nurse will inject it into the patient.
The uterus will be examined in both sagittal and transverse views to examine the entire uterine anatomy, including the cervix, ovaries, adnexa, myometrium, and endometrium (thickness and consistency). The measurement of uterine dimensions (length and height) is taken in the sagittal plane, whereas the width is assessed in the transverse plane (at the level of the tubal ostia). The mid-sagittal plane is used to evaluate endometrial thickness. Ovarian length, height, and width will be measured, as well as the baseline AFC (antral follicle count of follicles measuring 2-10mm and >10mm).6 AFC is calculated by adding the total follicles of both ovaries (AFC5 is regarded as low, AFC>=20 is called ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and AFC=4 indicates a chance of menopause within the next 7 years).7–9
Free fluid and sliding sign (to see adhesion) are seen in examination of the culdesac- This involves applying gentle pressure through probe on the lower abdomen to assess the gliding of anterior rectum and sigmoid colon along the posterior aspect of the upper portion of uterus, cervix, and vaginal wall. When the sliding sign is “Negative”, it indicates the obliteration of the pouch of Douglas, which can be due to endometriosis.
Thus, data will be collected regarding the various causes of infertility relating to adnexal, uterine, and cervical pathologies, and ovarian causes (by measuring the ovarian volume, follicular size, and ovarian reserve assessment in the form of antral follicular count). Also, data regarding causes of infertility will be collected from different modalities like Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis and hysterosalpingography, and results of other modalities will be compared with results from transvaginal ultrasound.
As this is mainly a descriptive study, the data(causes) will be enumerated in a tabular form. And wherever possible accuracy of transvaginal sonography in diagnosing infertility will be mentioned in percentage (as compared to different modalities). Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software.
All participants will undergo baseline clinical evaluation followed by TVUS on days 2–5 of the menstrual cycle. Parameters such as endometrial thickness, follicular count, ovarian volume, and uterine morphology will be documented.
Subsequently, patients will undergo confirmatory testing as clinically indicated (HSG for tubal evaluation, laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis, and hormone profile for ovulatory status). TVUS findings will be compared to these reference standards to compute diagnostic accuracy.
This study will be a descriptive prospective cross-sectional study conducted on patients visiting the OPD department as well as the IPD patients of the Hospital from January 2023 to January 2025. The population will consist of married women in the age group of 18-40 years with the inability to conceive for one year despite being sexually active, who present to the gynecology department.
We will use purposive sampling to recruit the participants.
Sample size:
Formula with prevalence with proportion
Topic: female infertility.
Prevalence = 3.9 to 16.6% (average -10.25%) (website)
Formula
α: type I error = 0.05
Estimated proportion (p) = 0.10
Estimation of error (d) = 0.05
Minimum sample size needed = 139
Duration of study: 2023 – 2025
• Female patients under the age of 18.
• Female patients above the age of 40.
• Married female patients who refuse to give consent.
• Married female patients with suspected infertility caused by medication, radiation, or pituitary, adrenal, or thyroid gland issues.
• Female patients who are married and have a uterine congenital abnormality.
• Diagnosed male factor infertility (confirmed by semen analysis).
• Recent pelvic surgery (<6 months).
• Incomplete follow-up or refusal to undergo confirmatory tests.
Study Status:
Recruitment.
A study, ‘Role of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in assessing endometrial cavity of women presenting with infertility’ was conducted by K. Sarala et al. in 2018. This study concluded that hysteroscopy can be regarded as the gold standard in the diagnosis of infertility. The study compared the transvaginal findings with hysteroscopic findings. The transvaginal findings and hysteroscopic findings were similar. The various causes of infertility were endometrial hyperplasia, submucous fibroids, endometrial polyps, adhesions, and congenital malformations in decreasing order of frequency, respectively. Thus, it was concluded that although hysteroscopy is considered the gold standard, transvaginal sonography can be used as an initial investigation in infertility work.10
In the study conducted by Maysa S. Elkerdawy et al. on the role of ultra-sonography (USG) in the management of primary infertility, it was found that 60% of patients had uterine abnormalities (mainly subseptate and bicornuate uterus) while approximately 23% of patients had ovarian pathology (mainly polycystic ovaries). Only a small percentage of patients had tubal and cervical pathologies (like hydrosalpinx, cervical mass, etc.). It was further found that USG can be used as a primary tool for investigation.4
In the study carried out by Salaam AJ et al. on the topic of evaluation of infertile women using transvaginal USG, primary fertility constituted about 42% of total subjects while secondary infertility constituted about 58%, and about 54% had normal TVS findings and rest (46%) had abnormal findings like uterine fibroid, free fluid in Pouch of Douglas (POD), endometritis, and hydrosalpinx in the decreasing order of frequency. It was also found that there was a significant difference in volume between the right and left ovaries in infertile women with Polycystic Ovaries (PCO). This study found that a high yield of sonographic anomalies was observed on transvaginal sonography in infertile subjects, bolstering TVS's essential function as a useful diagnostic tool for evaluating infertility.11
In the study conducted on transvaginal sonographical findings by Nafeesa Binti Hussain et al. on women presenting with inability to conceive, they inferred the following: 75%of cases were of primary infertility while 25% of cases were of secondary infertility, and the most common pathological findings were polycystic ovarian syndrome (69%), followed by chronic pelvic inflammatory disorder, fibroid, anatomical disorders, endometrial or cervical polyps, and endometritis in decreasing order of frequency. The study concluded that PCO was the most frequent finding in women with infertility, which was easily diagnosed by transvaginal sonography.5
Transvaginal ultrasonography is a highly accurate method for detecting various disorders in the female reproductive system. The goal of this study is to identify the many diseases of primary and secondary infertility and to demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of TVS as a main inquiry in infertility.
This study will enumerate the various causes of infertility in today’s scenario in India, which will be educational and helpful in future planning of focus areas for further studies. This study will establish the importance of Transvaginal sonography as a first line in the diagnosis of infertility.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
No
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Gratton D, Harrington C, Holt S, Lyons E: Normal Pelvic Anatomy Using Transvaginal Scanning. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 1991; 18 (4): 693-711 Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fertility, Gynaecological Surgery, Robotic Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 2 (revision) 30 Jul 25 |
|
Version 1 16 Oct 23 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)