Interactions between special education teachers and children with chronic complex conditions: A qualitative study

Children with complex chronic conditions or special health care needs

The number of children with complex medical conditions has increased in recent decades. However, the rate of prevalence varies based on the definition and study context, ranging from 5% to 30% (Beers et al., 2003). A recent report showed that 18.8% of children in the United States had special health care needs (Ghandour et al., 2022). While various categorizations and definitions exist in the literature (van der Lee et al., 2007), complex chronic conditions (CCC) is defined according to the International Classification of Diseases (Feudtner et al., 2000; Feudtner et al., 2014). In an earlier study, Feudtner et al. (2000) proposed the following definition for CCC:

To date, the revised description of CCC covers various complex medical conditions, including neurological and neuromuscular disorders, cardiovascular disorders, congenital and genetic defects, and technology dependence (e.g., tracheostomy) (Feudtner et al., 2014). In this framework, an epidemiological survey in the United States found that approximately 10% of children had one or more CCC, while 2% had multiple CCC (Bjur et al., 2019). In Japan, relevant data show that around 20,000 students (~0.002% of children) with health disorders receive special education in accordance with their special health care needs (MEXT, 2018). Although many children with severe CCC who receive inpatient treatment appear to attend special needs schools, educational statistics on this issue are currently unavailable in Japan. While the exact rate of prevalence depends on the population, it is clear that there is an increasing number of children with CCC, which has therefore become an important area of focus in medicine and education (Feudtner et al., 2014; O’Connor et al., 2019).

Children with multiple CCC generally exhibit more severe functional impairment and limited participation because of their disorders. Moreover, some children with CCC and severe intellectual disabilities are classified as having profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD), which is characterized by very severe cognitive and neuromotor impacts (van Timmeren et al., 2016). For example, the causes of PIMD include genetic disease, brain malformation, oxygen deficiency, and/or intractable epileptic seizure. Such conditions vary across a range of factors, including severity, trajectory, multiple organ involvement, medical and technological assistance, and special needs to address psychological and developmental difficulties (McPherson et al., 1998; van der Lee et al., 2007). Thus, children with CCC may have a variety of special needs that require more attention and educational support in the school setting.

Educational challenges confronted by special education teachers who engage with children with CCC

Schools for sick children play cardinal roles in the education and development of those with health disorders that require long-term treatment or frequent hospitalization. Although inclusive education is emphasized in the general school setting, challenges still arise when educating children with CCC (Seki et al., 2017). As emphasized in special needs education, higher expertise and continuous learning are also expected in the Japanese educational system (Isogai, 2017). Given these factors, those with CCC or severe conditions often receive individualized education at special needs schools that are located in or adjacent to hospitals.

Since communication and interpersonal relationships are essential components in child development, the Japanese special education system aims to establish both (MEXT, 2017). However, teachers who educate children with CCC may have difficulty achieving these goals due to functional limitations that arise under complex medical conditions. Moreover, children with very limited functioning require special curricula on a daily basis as well as continued intervention to improve their arousal, positioning, motor function, and communication (Yeh et al., 2019). Despite the fact that scholars have identified a gap between expected educational standards and actual practice, there is still a lack of evidence on the difficulties and challenges experienced by teachers (Taniguchi, 2011b). In addition to the perspectives of parents and children, it is essential to investigate those held by teachers, as these latter points of view can help clarify practical roles when educating students with chronic conditions (Runions et al., 2020). While previous studies have focused on general difficulties in this context, there is still a lack of evidence on specific challenges that arise when attempting to establish interpersonal relationships and communicate with children with CCC, especially in the Japanese educational system (Takeda, 2006; Taniguchi, 2011a). To improve special education practices when teaching children with CCC, it is therefore critical to investigate how teachers themselves understand and experience interactions and communication difficulties.

Aim

This study investigated current perceptions, experiences, and educational challenges that special education teachers encounter when developing interpersonal relationships and communicating with children with CCC. We first developed the following qualitative research questions:

Study design

This study adopted a cross-sectional qualitative design with semi-structured face-to-face interviews conducted on an individual basis from August 2018 to February 2019.

Participants

The study participants were teachers who provided special needs education to sick children in Japan. The participants were recruited based on their experience in teaching sick children (i.e., health disorders). We set the following inclusion criteria: 1) experience teaching children with CCC and 2) work in special needs schools for health disorders. The first criterion was confirmed after the interview because we obtained detailed information on their teaching experience in the interviews. In cooperation with their school principals, we selected participants with diverse backgrounds (i.e., elementary, middle, and high school levels and years in experience). The potential participant teachers were selected by the school principals or a senior teacher based on the teachers’ experience and backgrounds. Teachers with minimal experience in this area (i.e., less than four months) were not recruited. Ultimately, we recruited 21 participants from three schools for hospitalized children with health disorders, including 15 from School 1, 2 from School 2, and 4 from School 3. All 21 teachers participated in this study and were confirmed that they had experience in teaching children with CCC. We selected School 1 because it was the only school for hospitalized children with health disorders in Oita prefecture, Japan, where this study was conducted. However, Schools 2 and 3 were located in Oita and Hokkaido prefectures and they were selected based on differences in the conditions of children therein.

Settings

More specifically, School 1 was a special needs facility for children admitted to an adjoining hospital. The conditions of their disorders varied, including internal organ diseases (e.g., kidney diseases), neuromuscular disorders, and neurological disorders. As for functioning, their restrictions ranged from mild (e.g., physical activities and food intake) to severe (e.g., multiple severe disabilities). Of note, the severe conditions included a permanent vegetative state caused by hypoxic encephalopathy or traumatic brain injury. School 2 was a special needs facility for students who received outpatient treatment in Oita, while School 3 was a special needs facility in Hokkaido (another northern area in Japan) that received inpatient children with muscular dystrophies.

Participants’ characteristics

Table 1 lists demographic information for the study sample. As shown, 10 (48%) of the participants were women. Across the sample, teaching experience ranged from eight to 40 years (median 19, interquartile range [IQR] 13–29), while experience with special needs education for children with health disorders ranged from less than one year to 35 years (median 6, IQR 3–7). As for grade level, their work included students from elementary to secondary school. Table 2 summarizes the conditions of children from relevant experiences of the teachers.

Procedures

This study adopted a cross-sectional qualitative design with semi-structured face-to-face interviews, as conducted on an individual basis from August 2018 to February 2019. The interview schedules were arranged with a contact teacher at each school. As such, we asked the participants about their practical experiences and difficulties when engaging with students with CCC. We audio-recorded all interviews and transcribed for analysis. To draw narratives from their experiences, we developed an interview guide to capture potential challenges and personal beliefs regarding communication and interpersonal practices with children with special health care needs. This included questions about difficulties that may arise during teacher-student interactions, restrictions, and personal thoughts and practices (e.g., “Please describe your experiences when teaching children with complex chronic conditions, including any challenges you confronted during communication and when developing interpersonal relationships”).

Specifically, we developed the interview guide using knowledge about the domain of interest, a literature review, and educator opinions. Domain knowledge included the conceptualization of education for sick children, knowledge of the diseases of children with CCC, and resources in Japanese educational systems. The interview-guide was developed by two researchers (first and third authors), who had different professions. A pilot-testing of the guide was not performed for this study. Although we used this guide to elicit experiential narratives, we also encouraged the participants to talk freely about any relevant views, ideas, experiences, and challenges. The interview guide can be found under Extended data (Fujino, 2022).

The interviews lasted from 43 to 71 minutes (median 52), and were conducted in Japanese by the first and third authors and a research assistant. The interviewers discussed the research aim, topic, educational systems, and possible challenges when teaching children with CCC several times. The first author provided training (about 4.5 hours) for the current study to maintain the quality of the interviews.

Data analysis

We analyzed the interview data through a thematic analysis. This allowed us to identify themes pertaining to the beliefs and challenges expressed by participants when teaching children with CCC at special needs schools. Using the thematic analysis approach, researchers aim to explore experiences and perceptions based on qualitative data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Clarke & Braun, 2013; Terry & Hayfield, 2021). In this study, we familiarized ourselves with the interview data by repeatedly reading the transcripts. Prior to identifying themes, we inductively coded the transcripts to identify relevant features based on our study topic. We did not generate a priori codes. Before the data were coded, impressions of the interview transcripts were discussed between the first and third authors. In the coding process, the authors tried to create codes that summarized the data meaning based on the research questions of this study. The first author coded the transcribed text, then discussed the coding with the second author. Because the codes were modified during this discussion, the first author re-coded the original text to confirm the data context. Only the first author coded all the transcripts based on the approach employed in thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021; Clarke & Braun, 2013). The themes were developed by repeatedly reviewing the content of the code, creating tentative themes, comparing the theme to the code, and repeating the review to ensure that each theme reflected a central organizing concept (Clarke & Braun, 2013). We finalized the themes and codes through this iterative process. As an exploratory analysis, we also investigated differences based on years of experience educating sick children. In these processes, we used MAXQDA 2022 (VERBI Software GmbH, Berlin, German), a software for qualitative data analysis, in coding and integrating the transcripts. After completing the qualitative data analysis in Japanese (the original language of the data), the excerpts were translated into English for presentation in this article by a professional bilingual translator.

The key assumption was that teachers may confront challenges when teaching children with CCC. In this context, challenges related to communication and interpersonal relationships may be central issues; moreover, these factors may be compounded by restrictions in the educational environment (Takeda, 2006; Taniguchi, 2011a). The first author is a psychologist who works with children and adolescents with disabilities, focusing on psychological support and special educational needs. The second author is a clinical psychologist with experience providing psychological support to individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities and mental disorders. The third author is a special education teacher.

Ethical considerations

This study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards set forth in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The protocol was approved by Oita University Faculty of Education Research Ethics Committee (approval number: H30-001-013). We obtained written informed consent from all participants prior to study enrollment. Participants agreed to the following treatment of data: the materials obtained in the interviews will be partially reported but personally identifiable information will be processed, and the materials will not be publicly available. We removed any identifying information from the interview transcripts before presenting them in this manuscript.

Searching for the meaning

This theme describes beliefs about teacher-child interactions. The central concept pertains to the “true” meaning of responses and interactions with children with CCC, especially among those with severe conditions. In particular, it can be difficult to interpret responses from children with minimal communicative abilities (i.e., recognized responses are very subtle). Although objective evaluations are required in professional practice and may be useful for identifying consistency in reactions, subjective interpretations are also essential when attempting to find the meaning of the interactions.

In regard to communication difficulties, the central experience pertained to how teachers comprehended subtle responses from children with CCC. Some participants discussed questions about this issue when describing interaction problems. For example, children with profound disabilities often have minimal physical functioning and may only be capable of slight movements in the fingers or eyes. At the same time, comorbid intellectual and/or sensory disabilities complicate the process of understanding their actions and responses. In such cases, teachers may have difficulty interpreting the meanings of ambiguous or weak responses:

From this perspective, the “true” meaning of subtle physical responses is unknown. More difficult cases occur when interacting with children who exhibit “hardly any such movements,” at times in association with a disorder of consciousness. One participant said the following: “Although there are some of them who are like this [who react with small movements], there are also those who cannot even express themselves in this way. It becomes really difficult in such cases” (P13, 6-10 years of experience for sick children). Teachers who successfully interact with students with CCC may experience a “really a wonderful feeling.” While the participants intricately explained their beliefs and emotional experiences in the context of interacting with children with children with CCC (Table 3, quote 1), their attempts were not always successful, especially in cases where children had minimal functioning. For example, one participant said the following about interacting with children who had disorders of consciousness: “feels like I am talking to myself and putting on a one-man show.” This seems to describe an overly exhausting practical experience.

Despite various difficulties during teacher-child interactions, the participants insisted that they made attempts (Table 3, quote 2). To avoid subjective interpretations made solely based on impressions, objective observations or physiological responses (e.g., heart rate and SpO₂) may also be used to assess the status and reactions of children (Table 3, quotes 3–4). By contrast, several participants described the need to make their communications into “a story.” Such narratives are also related to difficulties and questions pertaining to their engagement with children, especially among those with minimal functioning. One participant described the meaning of an interaction with a child with disorder of consciousness, wherein the lack of “readable” responses made it difficult to conceive the existence of an interpersonal interaction. As an alternative to objective assessments of responses/reactions, the participants sought more subjective individualized “stories” to derive meaning from their practices (Table 3, quote 5). One said the following:

Without any such meaning, the practice becomes “quite uninteresting.” Therefore, creating or finding “a story” is an essential aspect of making interactions more meaningful. This constitutes an element of support for teachers who engage with children with minimal functioning and/or CCC.

CCC as a difficult reality

This theme describes experiences with children’s illnesses and the conditions of their disorders. The participants valued thinking about the children’s experiences with their own disease as well as how they experienced the disease as an observer. For example, teachers may experience a child’s disease progression, perhaps even leading to death. Such descriptions reveal unique concepts that emerge when working with severely ill children.

The conditions of disorders certainly affect functioning and create limitations for children. Those with severe conditions may need to live in the hospital for years. Given these factors, the participants strongly recognized their participatory limitations. One described some common environmental limitations and discussed how children may experience them:

As some CCC are progressive in nature, cases in which conditions worsen can be “the most difficult,” both for the teachers and children. In fact, teachers may avoid talking about the progressive nature of such diseases altogether (Table 4, quotes 6 and 7). For example, one participant described their difficulty with a child who had begun to lose ambulation due to Duchenne muscular dystrophy (a genetic progressive muscular disorder) (Table 4, quote 8). From the teacher’s perspective, the emotional impacts of disease progression were recognized as “tough” due to various emotional and behavioral issues. When children have life-threatening illnesses, teachers may even experience their death. In fact, several participants had experienced the death of children with CCC. Even when participants had relevant expertise, these cases were very difficult, often evoking negative emotions, psychological distress, and grief:

In addition to the medical condition itself, educational systems sometimes become barriers for teachers. Teachers make individualized educational plans for children; however, the educational practice with the children does not proceed as originally planned. Realization of the plan is often not possible. Sometimes, there are “a lot of days off,” and “things don’t go well in terms of their health.” Because variability of the functioning and disabilities changes the ways of interaction and communication, teachers are required to have different ways of interacting with each child (Table 4, quote 9).

Cooperation with medical care was considered another major environmental barrier. Although different professionals or organizations must collaborate to support children with CCC, cooperative engagement between medical professionals was perceived as challenging: “Really, I think it is a bit of a difficult issue as to what real cooperation is. I can’t say they are cooperating, but I can’t say they aren’t” (P11, 6–10 years of experience with sick children). Meanwhile, differences in language, attitudes, and values can hinder interprofessional cooperation (Table 4, quote 10).

Widening experience for the future

This theme describes beliefs about children’s experiences in their daily lives, special education schools, and hospitals. Because of various environmental and hospital-related restrictions, the participants valued the idea of widening their experiences with children with CCC. For such children, essential developmental components included time and interaction with other children, enhanced motivation to interact with surrounding individuals, and improved communication.

A central concept of this theme is rooted in the fact that most children with severe CCC spend “most of their time in the hospital” to receive inpatient treatment. As a result, the range of their experiences and activities tends to be limited. Although the participants eagerly tried to create opportunities for interactions with other people, such efforts were often difficult due to environmental limitations, including the hospitalization itself:

Opportunities to interact with peers were considered essential, and therefore encouraged (Table 5, quote 11). The participants hoped to widen interactions with other children and facilitate interactions with surrounding adults, as each student was used to being accompanied by a teacher (Table 5, quote 12). However, it is also important to note that adult-student relationships sometimes hindered children from behaving independently or spontaneously (Table 5, quote 13). For that reason, the participants carefully made their attempts: “[I tried] to help as much as possible, but sometimes, I also tried to wait until the patient was willing to move his/her hand as much as possible” (P09, 6–10 years of experience with sick children).

From the future-oriented perspective, teachers value continued developmental goals for children, but those with CCC often take longer to achieve them, in some cases years. One participant said: “Sometimes it is the year to create a starting point, and other times it is the year when we have to produce an achievement” (P02, 6–10 years of experience with sick children). Even if the teacher cannot identify significant improvements in targeted behaviors or performances, some progress may still result in future developmental gains for children with severe CCC. In the long-term context, such perceptions may support teachers who engage with these children.

Priority for interacting with children

This theme describes beliefs about interactions and relationships with children with CCC. We also identified two subthemes. The first is “relationship as a basis for interacting with children,” referring to the belief that a positive child-teacher relationship creates a fundamental basis for meaningful interactions and educational practices. The second is “child’s life after leaving the school/hospital,” referring to the idea that the supportive relationship will end once the child graduates from school or is discharged from the hospital.

Relationship as a basis for interacting with children

Since relationships are viewed as a critical basis for interaction and communication, the participants valued the process of building them with children with CCC “rather than teaching any classes first.” Given that illness directly affects the lives of these children, one participant pointed out the importance of giving them time to adapt to life in the hospital (Table 6, quote 14), especially because this environment often increases anxiety.

Many hospitalized children have a range of conditions that require inpatient treatment. Thus, facing medical difficulties is also a critical aspect of building trusting relationships with those who have severe conditions. For children with life-threatening diseases such as cancer, teachers sometimes face suffering, but also share hopes, feelings, and emotions. While this was discussed as a particularly “hard and painful” experience (Table 6, quote 15), the participants continued to believe in the meaning of teachers maintaining their presence with children and working toward supportive relationships.

Child’s life after leaving the school/hospital

The children were also seen as having life in future contexts. As most were enrolled at schools for hospitalized children, their attendance was not considered firm. Some remained for very short periods (e.g., two to several weeks), while others stayed much longer (e.g., six months to multiple years). As teachers are therefore given limited time to involve themselves with these children, they tend to think about their lives after school or the hospital. One participant said: “I guess the present situation is that temporary, a place to come” (P08, 6–10 years of experience with sick children). In this sense, the children were viewed as going away for a short period of time, in contrast to schools where they would be expected to remain until graduation. According to another participant, continued relationships are associated with medical conditions that do not sufficiently improve for hospital discharge. Thus, leaving the school and ending the relationship implies that the child’s condition has improved (Table 6, quote 16).

The concept of life after leaving school also contextualized a range of experiences outside the school setting. Both at the school for sick children and in the hospital, conditions were well-understood by teachers and other professionals, but efforts were often required to avoid their recurrence after leaving. One participant said: “Even though I am getting older and have been a teacher for a long time, I still have concerns about where doing this will lead [in the child’s future]” (P11, 6–10 years of experience with sick children). In this regard, even experienced teachers may have difficulty predicting children’s long-term needs and incorporating them into their educational practices.

Meaning of interactions

This study focused on interactions and communications between teachers and children with CCC. The process of supporting sick children can generally act as a source of motivation and satisfaction for teachers (Lopez & Corcoran, 2014; Małkowska-Szkutnik et al., 2021), but our results suggest that interactions with children with CCC often lead to difficulties, especially in cases involving severe or complex conditions. To ensure that communication is reciprocal, teacher must focus on careful communicative approaches and responses when working with children with severe disabilities (Fylkesnes & Ytterhus, 2021). However, this process can be extremely difficult when children have severe limitations, as suggested in this study. In cases where children cannot or do not respond, teachers may find it very difficult to receive tangible feedback on their efforts. In their practices with these children, our participants questioned and searched for the meaning of both their involvement and the employed educational approach. In such cases, objective evaluations may help clarify the state and usefulness of those approaches (Nozaki & Kawasumi, 2013). In the same instance, one may therefore find it useful to discuss the issue from a value perspective (i.e., finding meaning and value in educational practices).

A theoretical consideration rooted in phenomenological perspectives on subjectivity and objectivity may provide insight into interactions with children who have minimal functioning (Evensen, 2021). One direction of interaction and communication was taken from the perspective that communication is a form of pure technique. This makes children’s expressions more accessible to unfamiliar individuals. In turn, the same perspective is important for sharing with other individuals who are involved with the child (e.g., medical professionals), as also described by our participants. Another direction is offered by the perspective that considers contextual impressions and relational/interactional stimuli (Evensen, 2021), which entails a more subjective nature of perceptions and interpretations. In sum, professionals who work in special needs education should integrate objective and subjective perspectives during their interactions with children, especially when searching for meaning in their practices.

The challenge of CCC

CCC is a critical aspect that affects the challenges and difficulties encountered by special education teachers and their students. As several participants in this study described, teachers may experience cases in which the child mentally and physically collapses, perhaps leading to worsened health or death. Because they tend to have emotional involvement with these children, such relational aspects may lead to other challenging experiences (Benigno & Fante, 2020; Hart & Garza, 2013; Małkowska-Szkutnik et al., 2021; Steinke et al., 2016). Teachers who witness physical and psychological pain in children may also incur psychological impacts due to their relational involvement. While developments in medical treatment have reduced the occurrence of such cases, they are still difficult for teachers to experience, and often characterize the educational practices they employ for sick children (Hart & Garza, 2013). In these situations, teachers are required to be resilient and sufficiently cope with their emotional responses (Benigno & Fante, 2020; Hart & Garza, 2013). To better position themselves for this, they may refer to professional experiences, train to improve coping strategies, and seek support from colleagues (Małkowska-Szkutnik et al., 2021).

To widen the child’s experience, teachers may also need to improve their own skills. As discussed above, teachers must adopt particular values or philosophies in their educational practices (Hillel Lavian, 2015). Sharing beliefs relevant to the support of children and altering their own teaching values (Soejima et al., 2020) may support emotional adaptation and enhance their professional capacity. In the absence of these elements, the process of educating students with complex needs may evoke emotional responses in teachers, potentially leading to emotional fatigue and burnout (Hillel Lavian, 2015).

Unfortunately, a validated program for improving interaction with CCC for special education teachers is not widely available. Self-determination theory, a theory of human motivation that has been applied across research fields, posits three basic psychological needs as being necessary for psychological health and well-being: autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Deci et al., 1980, 2017; Ryan & Deci, 2020). Based on this framework, one study reported that teachers experiencing higher relatedness with students engaged more in work and show less emotional exhaustion (Klassen et al., 2012). Although there are limitations to the application of self-determination theory in special education, it may be useful to explore the satisfaction or frustration of teachers’ basic psychological needs based on this theoretical framework devising support measures.

In Japan, efforts to accumulate professional experience and improve self-efficacy are urgently needed in special education for sick children, as teachers currently have limited experience in this field (Nagae, 2016; Takeda & Kasahara, 2001). In addition to general training for health disorders, specific training is required for some conditions, including rare genetic diseases and those associated with severe functional limitations (Garvey et al., 2020).

Challenges in educational practice

Although peer interactions are essential features in educational practice, children at hospital-based schools tend to have limited opportunities for this. Meanwhile, environmental restrictions create educational issues (Knauer et al., 2015). In this study, teachers believed it was important for students to have opportunities to be with or interact with other children. Indeed, research has shown that opportunities for peer interactions are important in child-child interactions, even if their disabilities are severe and multiple in nature, as this may increase spontaneous attention or approaches toward other children (Nijs et al., 2016). At the same time, these interactions are expected to widen the experiences of children and facilitate their relational and emotional development (Buysse & Bailey, 2016; Justice et al., 2014). Despite the various environmental limitations, teachers should therefore help hospitalized children engage in peer interactions and value activities that widen the potential for social relationships.

Coordination with other professionals is a long-standing issue in special needs education for sick children. While interdisciplinary communication and cross-organizational relationships, particularly with medical professionals, are emphasized in literature, this is often a challenging practice at schools in many countries (Ballard & Dymond, 2018; Małkowska-Szkutnik et al., 2021; McClanahan & Weismuller, 2015; Pufpaff et al., 2015). According to reports, the lack of a collaborative process is partly due to insufficient time for collaboration and inadequate interprofessional communication (Garvey et al., 2020). Moreover, cooperative engagements between individuals in different professional roles often lead to conflict, and are influenced by divergent opinions, leadership, and counseling abilities (Weiss et al., 2018). These issues should be discussed and negotiated based on the expectations and needs of stakeholders. Earlier education programs for interprofessional collaboration may also facilitate the development of a foundation for accepting and balancing the weakness and strengths of each professional.

Implications for practice

Developments in communications technology may support the objective evaluation of children with profound disabilities. While some technologies help us communicate and interplay with children, the actual degree of technology use is influenced by whether the teacher perceives its value in special needs education (Anderson & Putman, 2020). Therefore, it is still important to assess their values on how and what is used, as well as how the interactions are performed.

As discussed above, satisfaction or frustration of basic psychological needs (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness) may be essential factors in understanding the experience of teachers and for supervisors to provide support (Moè et al., 2022; Ryan & Deci, 2020). In addition, continuous education for various learning approaches may stimulate the skills and creativity of teachers in the context of individualized and differentiated teaching (Weiss et al., 2018). To develop expertise in education for seriously ill children, this emphasizes the need to continue accumulating experience in the field. In this regard, seasoned professionals may serve as role models to help teachers with limited experience (Soejima et al., 2020; Takeda & Kasahara, 2001).

Limitations

This study also had some limitations. First, the range of children’s characteristics may strongly affect the difficulty experienced by special education teachers. As we did not find significant differences by the years of experience with children with CCC, the index may not be the best measure for capturing teacher’s abilities or depths of experiential knowledge. Several of our participants experienced educational practices with children with profound disabilities (e.g., a disorder of consciousness), while others experienced relatively acute conditions. In this regard, the characteristics of disorders and/or functioning may have affected the findings. A more focused approach among a more targeted population may reveal additional context-dependent issues. This issue may be also related to the method by which the teachers were recruited. Since the participants were selected by school principals or a senior teacher, the sample of this study might be biased to teachers who were likely to be more capable. Inclusion of participants with wider experience and capabilities may expand the range of their experiences. Second, we did not include the parents of children with CCC. Because interactions are based on phenomena constructed by two or more individuals, the involvement of individuals in these positions may reveal a more complex nature. It may also be important to consider that discrepancies exist between children, parents, and teachers (Maciver et al., 2019; O’Connor et al., 2016). Third, the transferability of this study may be limited in certain conditions. As the education systems for children with CCC and teacher training may differ between countries, the experiences of teachers may vary by location. However, the core themes identified in this study may be similar in other settings (e.g., difficulty interpreting limited responses from children and facing difficult conditions). Additionally, future comparisons between other countries or meta-synthesis of studies could yield meaningful insights into the current findings. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insight into the conditions experienced by teachers working in education for children with CCC.