ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes

[version 2; peer review: 4 approved]
PUBLISHED 12 Mar 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Global Public Health gateway.

This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.

Abstract

Background: Raw vegetables have been considered vehicles of enteroparasites. South American countries are among the most important exporters of fresh vegetables, including Ecuador, which has a tropical climate and soils rich in organic matter that allow it to harvest throughout the year for sale to different countries. The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence of the parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens grown in an agricultural area of the Ecuadorian Andes.
Methods: A cross-sectional field study was conducted with snowball sampling on 1,416 samples (516 fruits, 488 vegetables, and 412 leafy greens). Each sample were washed with water, and the resulting solution after removing the vegetables, was subjected to 24-hour sedimentation. The concentrated sediment underwent microscopic analysis.
Results: The overall positivity for parasitic contamination was 63.4%, with leafy greens having the highest contamination rate (76.9%) (P<0.0001), surpassing vegetables (67.8%) and fruits (48.4%). Cabbage (100%), onions (84%), and strawberries (60.2%) emerged as the most contaminated within their respective groups. Protozoa were more prevalent (49.6%) than helminths (15.5%) (P<0.0001). Blastocystis sp. (33.5%) ranked highest, followed by Eimeria spp. (26.3%), Entamoeba spp. (10.3%), Giardia spp. (8.3%), Balantidium spp. (6.9%), Cryptosporidium spp. (6.6%), Cyclospora spp. (4.4%), Cystoisospora spp. (0.5%), Strongylida (15.5%), and Ascaris spp. (0.4%).
Conclusion: The study reveals that vegetables and fruits for human consumption from this area of the Ecuadorian Andes are highly contaminated with various parasites, constituting a possible source of infection for humans and animals in this area, or in non-endemic areas where these products are marketed. The finding emphasizes the need for strict hygienic measures in agricultural crops, which will be properly achieved through the treatment of soil, manure and water used for cultivation.

Keywords

agricultural production, food, transmission, parasites, fruits, vegetables, leafy greens

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The revised version of the manuscript incorporates the corrections suggested by the reviewers. The Introduction was expanded, incorporating current bibliographic references. The Discussion was synthesized, and current quotes that better explain the results were incorporated.
In the new version of the article, an extensive grammar check is done, improving the clarity and coherence of the manuscript.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Zulbey Rivero
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Papa Kofi Amissah-Reynolds
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Alessandra Barlaam

Introduction

Incorporating vegetables, leafy greens, and fruits into human diet is essential to ensure vital nutrients crucial to maintaining health. However, these foods can also serve as vehicles for enteroparasites, representing a paradox within nutritional health practices (Punsawad et al., 2019; Al Nahhas and Aboualchamat, 2020; Barlaam et al., 2021, 2022; Faria et al., 2023). The role of vegetables in the spread of pathogens is notably substantial. The external surfaces of these foods can retain infectious stages of various parasites, thereby posing a risk of direct transmission to humans when consumed raw or poorly washed (Mufida et al., 2022; Lucas et al., 2023; Moreno-Mesonero et al., 2023).

The importation of fresh vegetables from endemic to non-endemic regions has contributed to the spread of parasites. Diarrhoea epidemics have been reported from the consumption of berries, tomatoes, peppers, onions, carrots, lettuces, cabbage, radishes and mixed-salad packages (Dixon, 2016; Machado-Moreira et al., 2019; Barlaam et al., 2021, 2022; Temesgen et al. 2022). Leafy greens are highlighted by the potential role of spinach, lettuce, cabbage, watercress, basil, mint, coriander, and parsley as vehicles for food-borne parasites (Ahlinder et al., 2022; Lucas et al., 2023; Moreno-Mesonero et al., 2023). There is evidence that leafy green can carry and spread parasites as Cyclospora cayetanensis, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis, Toxoplasma gondii, Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis sp., Cystoisospora belli, Balantidium coli, Dientamoeba fragilis, Echinococcus sp., Dipylidium caninum, Ascaris sp., Trichuris sp., and Nematode spp. Larvae (Dixon, 2016; Caradonna et al., 2017; Karshima, 2018; Robertson, 2018; Barlaam et al., 2021; Yahia et al., 2023).

The persistence and survival of parasites in soil (Qorom, et al. 2023; Falcone et al., 2023), vegetables (Falcone et al., 2023) and water (Kubina et al. 2023), has been proven. According to these studies, Cryptosporidium survives in lamb’s lettuce for two months and its washing showed limited effectiveness in reducing parasite load and had no impact on the parasite’s survival. Furthermore, chlorination of the wash water failed to improve the efficiency of the disinfection process. The situation is aggravated by cases of parasite resistance to certain chemical and physical inactivating agents (Ramos et al., 2013). This underlines the ability of parasites to persist and survive along the food chain, facilitating their transmission to humans, even far from the site of production (Dixon, 2016; Caradonna et al., 2017; Barlaam et al., 2021, 2022; Temesgen et al. 2022; Ahart et al., 2023).

Fruits are also considered significant carriers of parasites because they are consumed raw and do not undergo disinfection treatments such as the use of vinegar (Honório Santos et al., 2019). The study of berries is particularly important since their consumption has increased recently due to their high nutritional value, as a source of bioactive compounds and antioxidants (Tefera et al., 2018; Barlaam et al., 2022; Lucas et al., 2023). Unfortunately, berries such as raspberries and strawberries can carry infective forms of pathogens due to their delicate and porous nature, facilitating the attachment and protection of parasites. Inappropriate practices in cultivation, harvesting and handling pose a significant risk to consumers (Tefera et al., 2018; Temesgen et al., 2022). Recent molecular studies demonstrated the persistence in berries of parasites such as Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Giardia duodenalis, Entamoeba histolytica, Toxoplasma gondii, Acanthamoeba, Vermamoeba vermiformis, Blastocystis sp., and Echinococcus (Marques et al., 2020; Barlaam et al., 2021, 2022; Trelis et al., 2022; Temesgen et al., 2022; Moreno-Mesonero et al., 2023), highlighting their resistance to washing processes and disinfection (Temesgen et al., 2022; Kubina et al., 2023).

The presence of parasites in the vegetables is an indicator of the lack of adherence to good agricultural practices (Lucas et al., 2023). The main risk factors for the transmission of parasites through vegetables include the soil contamination with excrement from defecation or direct fertilization (Ercumen et al., 2017; Falcone et al., 2023) and the use of contaminated water for irrigation, pesticide dilution or equipment washing (Efstratiou et al., 2017; Karshima, 2018; Tefera et al., 2018).

Although parasites do not multiply in food, the transmission of infectious forms is closely linked to their resistance to survive in the environment attached to vegetables, as reported by studies carried out throughout Latin America: Argentina (Falcone et al., 2023); Brazil (Luz et al. 2017; Honório Santos et al., 2019; De Farias et al., 2021); Bolivia (Rodríguez et al., 2015); Colombia (Polo et al., 2016); Cuba (Puig-Peña et al., 2013); Ecuador (Bracho-Mora et al., 2022); Peru (Pérez-Cordón et al., 2008; Benites Salcedo et al., 2019; Lucas et al., 2023); Mexico (Chávez-Ruvalcaba et al., 2021); Venezuela (Cazorla-Perfetti et al., 2013; Devera et al., 2021).

South American countries are among the most important exporters of fresh vegetables. Ecuador has tropical climate and soils rich in organic matter that allow it to harvest fruits, vegetables, and grains throughout the year. According to data from the Agriculture and Livestock Ministry, during 2014-2018 period, Ecuador raised more than $3,500 million by exporting 6 million tons of fruits and vegetables (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería Ecuador, 2020). Unfortunately, Ecuador has serious health problems in rural Andean regions, especially those located at high altitudes, mostly inhabited by indigenous populations whose means of subsistence is agriculture, livestock and animal husbandry (González-Ramírez et al., 2021, 2022).

Moreover, Ecuadorian farmers often do not use good agricultural practices due to the lack of training, confidence, or economic resources, which is detrimental to food quality production. Two local reports have shown high level of parasitic contamination in vegetables: up to 82.3% in lettuce from Manabí province (Bracho-Mora et al., 2022) and up to 70.6% in fruits and vegetables of six rural communities in the parish of San Andrés, Chimborazo province (González-Ramírez et al., 2022).

Due to the alarming contamination data previously reported by our group, in this work we have evaluated the detailed parasitic contamination of all fruits, vegetables and leafy greens grown in the capital of San Andrés, an agricultural zone of the Ecuadorian Andes.

Methods

Study area

The study area was the community of San Andrés, Guano canton, Chimborazo province of Ecuador, located at 3,900 meters above sea level. The local temperature ranges between 5-18 °C, and rainfall varies between 500-1,000 mm/year. There are two rainy periods, February to May and October to November; the remaining months are transitional with moderate rains. Evapotranspiration affects the drought of the soil, which originates from volcanic ashes of variable textures, most of which are shallow silty loam, with a pH of 4.5 to 6.5. There are loamy soils in the areas with the highest agricultural production, but they are affected by chemical fertilizers. There are also sandy soils with low fertility because they do not retain moisture and nutrients; the latter and the action of steep slopes make them susceptible to erosive processes; consequently, crops and sowing grass are not abundant. However, agricultural activity is 34.5%, and cattle breeding activity is 50.4%; these two are the main means of financial income for the local population (PDOT San Andrés, 2015).

Government records indicate that 47.9% of the rural population of Ecuador lives in poverty, with an average monthly family income of $84.05, and 27.5% living in extreme poverty, with an average income of $47.70. The province of Chimborazo has an illiteracy rate of 13.5%, and the community of San Andrés has an indigenous population of 36.9% (INEC, 2020). Hence, their training is based on habits and customs acquired from their ancestors, which may contribute to as a lack of basic hygiene and sanitary measures. The most remote communities have built septic tanks, and the communities closest to the capital have sewers; however, both drain wastewater into rivers and streams (PDOT San Andrés, 2015).

Investigation design

A field study, cross-sectional, observational and descriptive, was carried out during 1 month of rain and 7 months of drought. The snowball sampling technique was applied, whereby a grower helped locate the nearest farm and so on. All types of products found were included in the sampling (1,416 samples in total); the inclusion criteria were that all agricultural products must come from San Andrés fields and those not cultivated in the community were excluded.

Sampling

The total of 1,416 samples analyzed included 516 fruits of 8 types: Fragaria ananassa (strawberry), Rubus glaucus (blackberry), Physalis peruviana (uvilla), Prunus persica (peach), Citrus limon (lemon), Psidium guajava (guava), Ficus carica (fig), and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato); 488 vegetables of 9 types: Allium cepa var. rosum (red onions) and Allium cepa L (white onions), Solanum tuberosum (potato), Daucus carota (carrot), Raphanus sativus (radish), Beta vulgaris (beet), Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper), Capsicum frutescens (chili pepper), and Lupinus mutabilis (bean chochos) and 412 leafy greens of 8 types: Medicago sativa (alfalfa), Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Brassica oleracea (cabbage), Beta vulgaris (chard), Petroselinum crispum (parsley), Coriandrum sativum (cilantro), Apium graveolens (celery), and Nasturtium officinale (watercress).

All samples were obtained from the owners’ fields and stored in hermetically sealed propylene bags. Each sample was labelled indicating the plant species name, origin, date, and time of collection. The samples were immediately transported in their containers with cooling gels to the Laboratorio de Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, to be processed within one hour of collection.

Ethical considerations

The sampling was carried out with the appropriate permission of the Cantonal and Parochial Decentralized Autonomous Governments. All farmers collected samples of their own crops (as they always do), knowing that the study benefits the community, without compromising the health of the population with respect to bioethical principles.

Parasitological analysis

The processing protocol for the parasitological analysis of all samples, previously described by Rivero de Rodríguez et al. (1998), was utilized. For the processing of the samples, 75 g of vegetables, fruits or green leaves were taken and added to 500 mL of previously filtered and boiled water. The contents were stirred with the help of a magnetic stirrer for 1 hour, the remains of the vegetable were removed and the solution was left to stand for 24 hours. Subsequently, the solution was decanted and the first fraction was collected in 15 mL tubes to be subjected to centrifugation for 5 min at 800 xg. Once the concentrate or sediment was separated, the supernatant was discarded and the precipitate was reconstituted in 400 μL of saline (0.85%). Each sample was observed under a light microscope (Nikon E200) using 10x and 40x objectives. In addition, iodized solution and the ocular micrometer were used when necessary, for stain parasitic structures or to measure the dimensions for their recognition. Additionally, a smear was made with one drop from the pellet and prepared for acid-fast staining (using a modified Zielh-Neelsen technique) for coccidia oocyst detection and identification after measurement, mainly Crytosporidium and Cyclospora, and subsequent microscopic assessment (100×) (García et al., 1983).

Statistical analysis

The database made in Microsoft Excel was exported to SPSS Statistic 26.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA). The difference in parasitic contamination between the various categories of plant products and the predominant parasite type in each plant species were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test (χ 2) and Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

When analyzing the different crop products, a total of 898 (63.4%) were contaminated by parasites. Noteworthy, every sample analyzed showed more than one associated parasite, i.e. 100% multiparasitism was detected. A statistically significant difference between the overall contamination rates, was observed with the leafy greens (76.9%) being more contaminated than vegetables (67.8%) and both, more contaminated than fruits (48.4%) ( P<0.0001). In total, 15 protozoa and 2 helminth nematodes were identified, with protozoa also showing a higher prevalence (49.6%) than nematodes (15.5%) (P<0.0001). Blastocystis sp. was outstanding (33.5%) (P<0.0001), showing central body, granular, and resistance forms, whereas dividing, globular, or amoeboid forms were not observed. Other protozoa identified include Eimeria spp. (26.3%), Entamoeba spp. (10.3%), Giardia spp. (8.3%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (6.6%). Regarding the nematodes, Strongylida was more frequent than Ascaris spp. (P<0.0001) (see Table 1).

Table 1. Distribution of parasites according to the plant type analysed.

ParasitesFruitsVegetablesLeafy GreensTotal
n=516%ICn=488%ICn=412%ICn=1416%IC
Blastocystis sp.19337.4(33.2-41.6)13427.5(23.5-31.4)14835.9(31.3-40.6)47533.5(31.1-36)
Entamoeba spp.295.6(3.6-7.6)489.8(7.2-12.5)6916.7(13.1-20.4)14610.3(8.7-11.9)
E. coli91.7(0.6-2.9)112.3(0.9-3.6)30.7(0-1.6)231.6(1-2.3)
E. hartmanni20.4(0-0.9)20.4(0-1)10.2(0-0.7)50.4(0-0.7)
Endolimax nana316(4.0-8.1)91.8(0.7-3.0)153.6(1.8-5.5)553.9(2.9-4.9)
Iodamoeba buetschlii20.4(0-0.9)20.4(0-1)10.2(0-0.7)50.4(0-0.7)
Giardia spp.265(3.2-7)408.2(5.8-10.6)5212.6(9.4-15.8)1188.3(6.9-9.8)
Chilomastix spp.61.2(0.3-2.1)81.6(0.5-2.8)30.7(0-1.6)171.2(0.6-1.8)
Retortamonas spp.00010.2(0-0.6)00010.1(0-0.2)
Enteromonas spp.30.6(0-1.3)00010.2(0-0.7)40.3(0-0.6)
Cryptosporidium spp.397.6(5.3-9.9)306.1(4.0-8.3)245.8(3.6-8.1)936.6(5.3-7.9)
Cyclospora spp.316(4.0-8.1)204.1(2.3-5.9)122.9(1.3-4.5)634.4(3.4-5.5)
Cystoisospora spp.30.6(0-1.2)20.4(0-1)20.5(0-1.2)70.5(0.1-0.9)
Eimeria spp.11221.7(18.1-25.3)12325.2(21.4-29.1)13833.5(28.9-38.1)37326.3(24.0-28.6)
Balantidium spp.51(0.1-1.8)306.1(4.0-8.3)6215(11.6-18.5)976.9(5.5-8.2)
Protozoa22042.6(38.4-46.9)23047.1(42.7-51.6)25361.4(56.7-66.1)70349.6(47-52.3)
Ascaris spp.00030.6(0-1.3)20.5(0-1.2)50.4(0-0.7)
Strongylida326.2(4.1-8.3)11523.6(20.4-28.0)7017(13.4-20.6)21715.3(13.7-17.4)
Helminths326.2(4.1-8.3)11824.2(20.4-28.0)7017(13.4-20.6)22015.5(13.7-17.4)
Total25048.4(44.1-52.7)33167.8(63.7-71.9)31776.9(72.8-81)89863.4(60.9-65.9)

When analyzing the percentages of parasites in the three groups of samples, the statistical analysis revealed a high prevalence in fruits of Blastocystis (37.4%) (P=0.0018), Cryptosporidium (7.6%) ( P<0.0001), Cyclospora (6%) (P<0.0001) and Endolimax nana (6%) (P=0.0028). In contrast, vegetables were mostly contaminated by helminths (24.2%) ( P<0.0001), represented mainly Strongylida (23.6%) (P<0.0001). Finally, the leafy greens showed high contamination with Eimeria (33.5%) (P=0.0002), Entamoeba spp. (16.7%) (P<0.0001), Balantidium (15.0%) (P<0.0001) and Giardia (12.6%) (P=0.0002). Overall, a total parasitic contamination of 76.9% (P<0.0001) with 61.4% (P<0.0001) being protozoa was obtained (see Table 1).

Table 2 summarizes the results according to the type of fruit, the highest number of protozoa was found in strawberries (60.2%) ( P<0.0001), with Blastocystis sp. (59.2%) (P<0.0001), E. nana (17.4%) (P<0.0001) and Cyclospora spp. (14.3%) (P=0.0011) the most frequent. In contrast, peaches were more often contaminated with helminths (30%) (P<0.0001).

Table 2. Distribution of parasites according to the fruit type analysed.

ParasitesStrawberryBlackberryUvillaPeachLemonGuavaFigTomatoTotal
n=98%n=83%n=56%n=50%n=56%n=57%n=50%n=66%n=516%
Blastocystis sp.5859.23542.21933.9244814251933.31530913.619337.4
Entamoeba spp.44.156002400915.83669.1295.6
E. coli44.144.800000011.8000091.7
E. hartmanni0011.2000000000011.520.4
Endolimax nana1717.367.2003611.835.30011.5316
Iodamoeba buetschlii000000000000002320.4
Giardia spp.1010.244.811.81211.811.82469.1265
Chilomastix spp.0033.6000000002411.561.2
Retortamonas spp.33.10000000000000030.6
Enteromonas spp.000000000000000000
Cryptosporidium spp.1111.21113.347.14811.8471234.5397.6
Cyclospora spp.1414.378.458.90011.835.30011.5316
Cystoisospora spp.1111.211.8000000000030.6
Eimeria spp.2020.42327.72442.9102011.858.817341218.211221.7
Balantidium spp.33.10011.80000000011.551
Protozoa5960.24655.42442.9163235.42035.123462943.922042.6
Ascaris spp.000000000000000000
Strongylida0000916.1153058.9001223326.2
Helminths0000916.1153058.9001223326.2
Total5960.24655.43257.13162712.52035.12448314725048.4

Parasitic contamination in vegetables is detailed in Table 3. The highest frequency of contamination was found in red (84%) and white (82.4%) onions, followed by chili pepper (78%) (P<0.0001). It is important to highlight the level of contamination detected in other vegetables that are eaten raw such as carrot (66%), radish (72.1%) and pepper (44%). When compared vegetables for the type of parasites, a higher frequency of protozoa (47.1%) than helminths (24.2%) was observed (P<0.0001).

Table 3. Distribution of parasites according to the vegetable type analysed.

ParasitesRed onionWhite onionPotatoCarrotRadishBeetPepperChili pepperBeans chochoTotal
n=50%n=51%n=52%n=53%n=61%n=51%n=50%n=50%n=70%n=488%
Blastocystis sp.28561631.41121.21222.62236.1917.661214281622.913427.5
Entamoeba spp.3612611.5611.3813.11325.51271434.3489.8
E. coli0023.935.811.958.200.0000000112.3
E. hartmanni001211.9000000.000000020.4
Endolimax nana0047.811.923.80000.000240091.8
Iodamoeba buetschlii00000011.90000.012000020.4
Giardia spp.816611.811.935.734.923.971471434.3408.2
Chilomastix spp.4823.911.900000000120081.6
Retortamonas spp.00000011.9000000000010.2
Enteromonas spp.00000000000000000000
Cryptosporidium spp.36713.723.8611.334.923.9002457.1306.1
Cyclospora spp.2423.911.959.434.9611.8000011.4204.1
Cystoisospora spp.000011.911.9000000000020.4
Eimeria spp.10201019.61528.81324.52236.11733.31224173471012325.2
Balantidium spp.1235.935.847.5711.5611.8123622.9306.1
Protozoa24482854.92751.92547.23354.12854.9193827541927.123047.1
Ascaris spp.000000000023.912000030.6
Strongylida16322854.92242.3713.21524.61121.61215300011523.6
Helminths16322854.92242.3713.21524.61325.52415300011824.2
Total42844282.44076.93566.04472.13772.5224439783042.933167.8

Regarding the parasitic contamination of leafy greens, parasites were found in almost each specimen analyzed of cabbage (100%), alfalfa (90.2%) and parsley (82.4%). Cabbage had high contamination with Eimeria (53.8%) (P<0.0001) and with Endolimax nana (13.5%) (P=0.0002), whereas lettuce was mainly contaminated with Entamoeba spp. (36.2%) (P<0.0001), and parsley with Blastocystis (56.9%) (P=0.0071) (Table 4).

Table 4. Distribution of parasites according to the leafy green type analysed.

ParasitesAlfalfaLettuceCabbageChardParsleyCorianderCeleryWatercressTotal
n=51%n=58%n=52%n=50%n=51%n=50%n=50%n=50%n=412%
Blastocystis sp.1325.52441.42038.512242956.9193812241937.314835.9
Entamoeba spp.47.82136.21630.83623.96127141019.66916.7
E. coli0011.711.9001200000030.7
E. hartmanni000000000000120010.2
Endolimax nana59.800713.50023.9120000153.6
Iodamoeba buetschlii000011.9000000000010.2
Giardia spp.59.858.6917.348713.7816481019.65212.6
Chilomastix spp.0000001223.900000030.7
Retortamonas spp.000000000000000000
Enteromonas spp.000011.9000000000010.2
Cryptosporidium spp.1235.223.81259.8364859.8245.8
Cyclospora spp.0011.747.70012244800122.9
Cystoisospora spp.000011.9120000000020.5
Eimeria spp.26511729.32853.814281325.591817341427.513833.5
Balantidium spp.713.7813.81121.251059.8816918917.66215
Protozoa3364.73763.84586.523463364.7255030602752.925361.4
Ascaris spp.120000000000120020.5
Strongylida1325.511191121.2612815.7612918612.07017
Helminths1325.511191121.2612815.7612918612.07017
Total4690.24374.15210030604282.4316239783466.731776.9

The comparative analysis of parasitic contamination rates (Table 5) showed higher parasites percentages in vegetables + leafy greens: total (72%) (P<0.0001), protozoa (53.7%) (P<0.0001) and helminths (20.9%) (P<0.0001). A higher prevalence of Eimeria (29%) (P=0.0027), Entamoeba spp. (13%) (P<0.0001), Giardia (10.2%) (P=0.0007), and Balantidium (10.2%) (P<0.0001) was found respect to the fruits. In contrast, higher percentages of Blastocystis (37.4%) (P=0.0199) and Cyclospora (6%) (P=0.0313) were found in fruits respect to vegetables.

Table 5. Comparation of parasitic contamination between fruits, vegetables and leafy greens.

ParasitesFruitVegetables + Greens leafy
n=516%ICn=900%IC
Blastocystis sp.19337.4(33.2-41.6)28231.3(28.3-34.3)
Entamoeba spp.295.6(3.6-7.6)11713(10.8-15.2)
E. coli91.7(0.6-2.9)141.6(0.8-2.4)
E. hartmanni20.4(0-0.9)30.3(0-0.7)
Endolimax nana316(4.0-8.1)242.7(1.6-3.8)
Iodamoeba buetschlii20.4(0-0.9)30.3(0-0.7)
Giardia spp.265(3.2-7.0)9210.2(8.2-12.2)
Chilomastix spp.61.2(0.3-2.1)111.2(0.5-1.9)
Retortamonas spp.00010.1(0-0.3)
Enteromonas spp.30.6(0-1.3)10.1(0-0.3)
Cryptosporidium spp.397.6(5.3-9.9)546(4.4-7.6)
Cyclospora spp.316(4.0-8.1)323.6(2.4-4.8)
Cystoisospora spp.30.6(0-1.2)40.4(0-.80)
Eimeria spp.11221.7(18.1-25.3)26129(26.0-32.0)
Balantidium spp.51(0.1-1.8)9210.2(8.2-12.2)
Protozoa22042.6(38.4-46.9)48353.7(50.4-57.0)
Ascaris spp.00050.6(0.1-1.1)
Strongylida326.2(4.1-8.3)18520.6(18.2-23.6)
Helminths326.2(4.1-8.3)18820.9(18.2-23.6)
Total25048.4(44.1-52.7)64872(69.1-74.9)

Finally, when parasitic contamination was compared between leafy greens (76.9%) and vegetables (67.8%), a statistically significant difference was found (P =0.0024) (see Table 6), including the highest contamination of leafy greens with Blastocystis (35.9%) (P=0.0064), Eimeria (33.5%) (P=0.0063), Balantidium (15.1%) (P<0.0001), Entamoeba spp. (16.8%) (P=0.0021) and Giardia (12.6%) (P=0.0290). In contrast, vegetables were found to be more contaminated by helminths than leafy greens (24.2%) (P=0.0082), mainly represented by Strongylida (23.6%) (P=0.0150).

Table 6. Comparation of parasitic contamination between vegetables and leafy greens.

ParasitesVegetablesLeafy Greens
TotalTotal
n=488%ICn=412%IC
Blastocystis sp.13427.5(23.5-31.4)14835.9(31.3-40.6)
Entamoeba spp.489.8(7.2-12.5)6916.8(13.1-20.4)
E. coli20.4(0-1)10.2(0-0.7)
E. hartmanni112.3(0.9-3.6)30.7(0-1.6)
Endolimax nana20.4(0-1)10.2(0-0.7)
Iodamoeba buetschlii91.8(0.7-3.0153.6(1.8-5.5)
Giardia spp.408.2(5.8-10.6)5212.6(9.4-15.8)
Chilomastix spp.81.6(0.5-2.8)30.7(0-1.6)
Retortamonas spp.10.2(0-0.6)00(0-0)
Enteromonas spp.00(0-0)10.2(0-0.7)
Cryptosporidium spp.306.2(4.0-8.3)245.8(3.6-8.1)
Cyclospora spp.204.1(2.3-5.9)122.9(1.3-4.5)
Cystoisospora spp.20.4(0-1)20.5(0-1.2)
Eimeria spp.12325.2(21.4-29.1)13833.5(28.9-38.1)
Balantidium spp.306.2(4.0-8.3)6215.1(11.6-18.5)
Protozoa23047.1(42.7-51.6)25361.4(56.7-66.1)
Ascaris spp.30.6(0-1.3)20.5(0-1.2)
Strongylida11523.6(20.4-28)7017(13.4-20.6)
Helminths11824.2(20.4-28)7017(13.4-20.6)
Total33167.8(63.7-72)31776.9(72.8-81.0)

Discussion

This study uncovers significant parasitic contamination in fruits (48.4%), vegetables (67.8%), and leafy greens (76.9%), from San Andrés a principal agricultural hub in the Ecuadorian Andes, attributed to poor hygiene practices in agriculture. The detection of multiple enteric parasites in these foods highlight the potential risk of transmitting infections if consumed without adequate sanitation. The local, national and international distribution of these foods, amplifies the risk of disseminating parasites to non-endemic regions, thereby increasing the likelihood of disease outbreaks as it was shown in studies on leafy greens and berries (Tefera et al., 2018; Marques et al., 2020; Barlaam et al., 2021, 2022; Faria et al., 2023).

Direct contact with human and animal excrements is a potential source of contamination of anthroponotic and zoonotic parasites for vegetables. It is also possible that free-living parasites (Strongylida) contaminate the crop products, being considered an insignificant finding in comparison with parasite prevalence’s reaching 97.3%. in humans (González et al., 2022) and 90.3% in animals (González et al., 2021).

When comparing the results of vegetable contamination from the San Andres capital, with an overall prevalence of 63.4%, (fruits 48.4% and vegetables 67.8%), was lower than the detected in provinces located at high altitudes and more indigenous populated with overall prevalence of 70.6% (fruits 67.1% and vegetables 73.6%) (González-Ramírez et al., 2022). Urban area used to have access to better methods of sanitation, cleaner restrooms with proper septic tanks, drinking water, and overall, more preventive education and information on food handling than rural areas. This could explain why central town of San Andres showed lower percent of parasitic contamination in their vegetable products when compared to the contamination rate determined in products from rural provinces located at high altitudes (63.4% vs 70.6%) (González-Ramírez et al., 2022).

In the present study, leafy greens were more contaminated (76.9%) than vegetables and fruits, probably since these maintain contact with the soil and organic fertilizers from the beginning as seedlings until they are fully grown, and external leaves allow protection for internal plant parts in contact with contaminated soil. The greater parasitic contamination of leafy greens has been explained by the irregularities of their leaves and the roughness of their surface that allows the adhesion of infectious parasitic forms that persist in the environment (Tefera et al., 2018; Temesgen et al., 2022; Falcone et al., 2023).

Vegetables were the second most contaminated products after leafy greens, surpassing fruits, which is explained by the greater contact they maintain with the soil. The rooted vegetables (tubercle) were found to be highly parasitized by nematodes (24.3%), possibly because they grew under the ground. Noteworthy, onions (54.9%), carrots (13.2%) and radishes (24.6%) are frequently consumed raw and can function as efficient vehicles for parasites. Evidence of these tubers exhibit significant rates of parasitic contamination has been previously reported elsewhere (Puig-Peña et al. 2013; Yahia et al. 2023).

Fruits growing on trees or bushes were found less contaminated than creeping fruits. It is possible that these fruits have been in direct contact with the irrigation water (Esteban et al., 2002; González-Ramírez et al., 2020), organic fertilizers and the soil (Dixon, 2016; Barlaam 2021, 2022; Falcone et al., 2023). However, the roughness of its surface is also a condition that can also influence the contamination of blackberry and peach (Tefera et al., 2018), the texture of its surface allows the adhesion of parasites dispersed by wind, insects or farmers’ hands (Dixon, 2016; Machado-Moreira et al. 2019).

Animal feces are a nutrient-rich fertilizer for agricultural systems and offer a low-cost solution (Daniels et al., 2016). However, without prior treatment (composting, storage, chemical treatment, drying, fermentation), it is a vehicle for microorganisms (Amissah-Reynolds et al., 2020). This risk factor was identified in the agricultural practice of San Andrés. (González-Ramírez et al., 2021), suboptimal crop management practices, including open defecation near crops without handwashing by farmers due to a lack of portable toilets, irrigation of crops with contaminated water and persistent unsatisfactory sanitary conditions in the areas where they sell their products (González-Ramírez et al., 2021, 2022).

Contaminated water from canals and wells (Esteban et al., 2002; González-Ramírez et al., 2020), spreads parasites and carries a high health risk, when is utilized for crop irrigation, supply animals, dilution of fertilizers and fungicides, washing machinery, equipment, and utensils work (Dixon 2016). Rain and sprinkler irrigation transport microorganisms from soil to plants when drops splash (Efstratiou et al., 2017). Besides, the wind lifts particles of dust from the ground that aid adherence of parasitic to the vegetables of trees or shrubs (Machado-Moreira et al., 2019), which explains the finding of Strongylida on the woolly surface of peaches.

Insects and animals’ action, must be considered (González-Ramírez et al., 2021, 2022). However, the greatest influence is exerted by the agricultural activities carried out by farmers, when handle vegetables without hygienic measures, during planting, harvesting, transporting, storage, and washing (Dixon, 2016; Machado-Moreira et al., 2019). Parasitic contamination of vegetables harvested in this area could be one of the causes of the high prevalence in humans (98.2%), without ruling out the action of water contamination (57-100%), mechanical vectors (52.7%), and animals (90.3%) in these communities (González-Ramírez et al., 2020, 2021, 2022).

After evaluating the crop contamination in the area, we warn about the need to sanitize the products before consuming them raw, because the contamination detected in this Andean area can also occur in other countries where producers do not apply hygienic measures (Falcone et al., 2023). These results suggest the need to integrate parasites to the list of contaminants that are managed in the microbiological criteria required by the Ecuadorian Technical Standard (INEN, 2016). Monitoring only Escherichia coli in vegetables is not a good indicator to guarantee food safety, due low infectious doses of parasites constitute a risk (Barlaam et al., 2022).

It is advisable to consider the potential effects of productive activities on food security; these include identifying and minimizing contamination of soil, water, or any other agent used in production, and monitoring animal health so that it does not represent threats (Tefera et al., 2018). Authorities must develop mitigation plans that involve hygiene education programs for producers and consumers. In addition, facilitate the implementation of more advanced technological procedures to improve the diagnosis of microorganisms in laboratories, as well as field routines to improve the quality and safety of these foods in accordance with standards (Temesgen et al., 2022).

In developing countries, where molecular analyzes cannot be done, due to their high cost and the difficulty in permission to transport samples to a molecular laboratory. The sedimentation technique, staining, and micrometric measurement allow the identification of parasites at low cost (it being essential that analysts are trained). We are aware of the importance of determining parasitic species by molecular methods, for epidemiological control and we recognize, the limitation of the present study in which the analyzes were carried out by microscopic diagnosis, although insufficient for specific identification, was relevant due to the percentage of parasite genera detected.

The prevalence of our study (63.4%) has been one of the highest, when compared to those described in Ethiopia 54.4% (Bekele et al., 2017); Brazil 50.9% (Luz et al. 2017); Ghana 57.5% (Kudah et al., 2018); Thailand 35.1% (Punsawad et al., 2019); Syria 34.4% (Al Nahhas and Aboualchamat, 2020); Peru 45.3% (Lucas et al., 2023); and Argentina 58.6% (Falcone et al., 2023). The parasite detected are similar to those reported in Andean area of Peru (Pérez-Cordón et al.,2008), with a greater number of protozoa than helminths.

Our results differ from those obtained in Brazil (Honório Santos et al., 2019), with prevalence of 70% in fruits: guava (90%), lemon and apple (70%) and grape (50%). The highest prevalence in this study was of the helminths A. lumbricoides, Ancylostomids, Taenia spp., and E. vermicularis, followed by B. coli and E. coli. These differences might be due to the high altitude of San Andrés (3,020–6,310 m above sea) could affect the evolution of soil-transmitted helminths due to the extreme environmental conditions such as low temperatures (0–19 °C), intense solar radiation and low rainfall (250 and 500 mm/year). In addition, these conditions affect the soil composition which is constituted by very thin layers of lithic materials of volcanic origin (González-Ramírez et al., 2022). Effect of altitude on helminths has been reported elsewhere (Chammartin et al., 2013).

Interestingly, in San Andrés, there were significant differences between contamination in leafy green types, which is consistent with the results that indicate highest-contaminated in lettuce, reaching rates of 83% Bolivia (Rodríguez et al., 2015); 54.2% Ghana (Kudah et al., 2018); 29.5% Syria (Al Nahhas and Aboualchamat, 2020); 80% Brazil (De Farias et al., 2021); 82.3% Ecuador (Bracho-Mora et al., 2022); 64.7% Argentina (Falcone et al., 2023); 23.8% Portugal (Faria et al., 2023).

Food-borne transmission of parasites is an emerging issue in countries around the world, although, verifying the transmission of parasites through food is not easy, there is a report from the Center for Science in the Public Interest in the United States, which found that, between 2004 and 2013, the consumption of fresh produce was associated with a total of 193,754 illnesses across 9,626 outbreaks. Of the total number of reported outbreaks, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were able to identify both the food source and the contaminant in fewer than 40 percent (CSPI, 2015).

Warning about contamination of unpasteurised apple juice, onions, salads, lettuce, basil, sandwiches, fruit salads, and raspberries with Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and Cyclospora (Dixon, 2016). Outbreaks, associated with the consumption of berries, specifically noting Cyclospora and Trypanosoma, this latter one associated with the consumption of açaí berries or their beverages (Tefera et al., 2018). Barlaam et al. (2021, 2022) confirm the contamination of produces exported from endemic to non-endemic countries by detecting C. cayetanensis, E. histolytica, and Cryptosporidium in berries imported to Italy from Peru, indicating a serious risk from contaminated produce.

Detection of foodborne parasites in produced has been reported in Latin American countries using the spontaneous sedimentation technique and optical microscopy. Contamination rates include: 77.78% vegetables in Venezuela (Cazorla-Perfetti et al., 2013), 83% lettuces in Bolivia (Rodríguez et al., 2015), 100% lettuces in Colombia (Polo et al., 2016), 50.9% vegetables in Brazil (Luz et al., 2017), 56.7% vegetables in Peru (Benites Salcedo et al., 2019), 82.3% lettuces in Ecuador (Bracho-Mora et al., 2022), 70.6% fruits-vegetables in Ecuador (González-Ramírez et al., 2022), 45.3% lettuces in Peru (Lucas et al., 2023), and 58.6% leafy vegetables in Argentina (Falcone et al., 2023).

In Europe, studies using molecular techniques have reported lower prevalences of parasites in fresh produce compared to Latin America. In Italia, Caradonna et al. (2017) detected G. duodenalis (0.6%), T. gondii (0.8%), Cryptosporidium spp. (0.9%), C. cayetanensis (1.3%), B. hominis (0.5%), and D. fragilis (0.2%) to overall contamination of 4.2% in salads. Barlaam et al. (2021, 2022) identified G. duodenalis (4.6%), Entamoeba histolytica (1%), and Cryptosporidium spp. (5.1%) in berries and salad. E. multilocularis (1.39%) in salad. Temesgen et al. (2022) identified T. gondii (2.9%), C. cayetanensis (6.6%), and Cryptosporidium spp. (8.3%) in berries.

On the contrary, in Spain, Trelis et al. (2022) demonstrated higher levels of contamination in green leafy vegetables, with G. duodenalis (23.3%) and Cryptosporidium spp. (7.8%), marketed in the city of Valencia. In the same city, Moreno-Mesonero et al. (2023) identified a greater variety of species than Trelis et al., in leafy greens and strawberries: Acanthamoeba (65.5%), T. gondii (37.2%), Vermamoeba vermiformis (17.3%), C. cayetanensis (12.7%), Cryptosporidium spp. (6.8%), Blastocystis sp. (1.8%), and Giardia sp. (1.7%). Similarly, in Portugal, Marques et al. (2020) have documented a contamination rate of 40% in fruits and vegetables with T. gondii.

When comparing findings from agricultural products from industrialized nations with our study in Ecuador, we obtained a higher prevalence and diversity of human and veterinary parasitic species. For example, in Italy (Barlaam et al. 2021, 2022), Spain (Trelis et al., 2022); Portugal (Marques et al., 2020), Norway (Temesgen et al., 2022) and Sweden (Ahlinder et al., 2022), coccidia were mainly identified. Notably, species prioritized in Europe such as Echinococcus, T. gondii, Toxocara, and Fasciola were not detected in our research (Bouwknegt et al., 2018). However, European studies used to be done on fruits and vegetables from supermarkets, which are pre-washed or disinfected prior to sale, in contrast to our agricultural products directly obtained from farmers’ fields. This is a factor that likely influences the observed prevalence rates.

The place sampling was identified as critical nodes for contamination (Lucas et al., 2023), this is linked to suboptimal crop management practices, including open defecation, the absence of handwashing due to a lack of portable toilets in the fields; and the use of fresh animal excrement as fertilizer (Amissah-Reynolds et al., 2020). Farmers neglect to sanitize work tools like shovels, picks, rakes, and wheelbarrows, facilitating the transfer of parasites between different crops. Furthermore, unsatisfactory sanitary conditions persist in the areas where they sell their products (González-Ramírez et al., 2022).

In Latin America there are the highest records of contamination in vegetables (Cazorla-Perfetti et al., 2013; Rodríguez et al., 2015; Polo et al., 2016; Luz et al., 2017; Benites Salcedo et al., 2019; Bracho-Mora et al., 2022; González-Ramírez et al., 2022; Lucas et al., 2023; Falcone et al., 2023), being countries endemic for parasites, from there they spread to other countries nonendemic, through fresh vegetables. Developing countries have not been able to control their parasites due to low socioeconomic and hygienic levels, and the inability to offer adequate health and education infrastructure that can change people’s habits and prevent environmental pollution.

The implementation of control measures in fresh produce preharvest and postharvest, as well as an adequate sanitary hygienic level of the producer, handler, and consumer, will be crucial to minimize the food transmission of protozoa and helminths. To control parasites at the time of cultivation and harvest, irrigation with properly treated water, monitoring the health and hygiene of agricultural workers, improving agricultural sanitation, and restricting access of livestock and other animals to crops and surface water bodies (building adequate drinking troughs) are needed. Additionally, proper construction and maintenance of septic tanks is important to prevent contamination by overflow (Tefera et al., 2018).

Unsafe agricultural practices are used very commonly by small farmers mainly in developing countries. To mitigate this problem, it is necessary to use treated water for irrigation, washing fresh produce, washing hands, and equipment. Good hygienic practices by farm workers involved in the cultivation, harvesting, and handling of produce are another important means of reducing the likelihood of contamination in endemic regions (Trelis et al., 2022), to ensure the safety of products from Latin American countries, and are not excluded from international markets, when implementing import restrictions from endemic countries, as suggested (Barlaam et al., 2021).

The recommendation is to impart hygienic practices through health education targeting farmers, traders, and consumers (Tefera et al., 2018; Trelis et al., 2022; Falcone et al., 2023). If programs are executed to guarantee sanitary control in the farms and the objectives of food security are achieved in production, exports would increase, translating to an increase in the economic income of the producing countries.

Conclusion

This study has highlighted significant parasitic contamination (63.4%), so much in fruits (48.4%), vegetables (67.8%), and leafy greens (76.9%), underscoring the potential health risks associated with the consumption of these products in their raw form without adequate hygiene practices. It illustrates how such products can become vehicles for the transmission of enteroparasites to both humans and animals, regardless of whether the area is endemic or non-endemic, where these items are distributed. Consequently, this research underscores the imperative for stringent hygienic protocols in the cultivation and harvesting phases. Effective mitigation strategies include the treatment of soil, manure, and irrigation water utilised in the agricultural process, alongside the enforcement of thorough disinfection practices prior to consumption.

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens harvested in an Andean agricultural area, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22313335.v2 (González-Ramírez et al., 2023).

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Data parasites fruits vegetables Ecuador.xlsx

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 23 May 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
González-Ramírez LC, Djabayan-Djibeyan P, Prato JG et al. Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.132957.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 12 Mar 2024
Revised
Views
4
Cite
Reviewer Report 13 Apr 2024
Zulbey Rivero, Chair of Parasitology, Universidad Tecnica de Manabi, Portoviejo, Manabí Province, Ecuador 
Approved
VIEWS 4
I agree with ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Rivero Z. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163126.r254884)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Mar 2024
Alessandra Barlaam, Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy 
Approved
VIEWS 12
The article has been significantly improved, therefore, in my opinion ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Barlaam A. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163126.r254887)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 23 May 2023
Views
27
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Jan 2024
Zulbey Rivero, Chair of Parasitology, Universidad Tecnica de Manabi, Portoviejo, Manabí Province, Ecuador 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 27
The article meets the objective proposed from the beginning and the introduction is brief but clear enough. The methodology is well described, but there is something that needs to be clarified and about which I am asking the authors in ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Rivero Z. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145917.r228641)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 4
    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the article.

    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 4
    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the article.

    ... Continue reading
Views
29
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Jan 2024
Alessandra Barlaam, Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 29
The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence of the parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens grown in Ecuador, one of the most important exporters of fresh vegetables. In total 63.4% of the samples were found ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Barlaam A. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145917.r228648)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 3

    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, and their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 3

    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, and their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the ... Continue reading
Views
28
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Jan 2024
Papa Kofi Amissah-Reynolds, Department of Biological Sciences Education, Faculty of Science Education,College of Agriculture Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Mampong, Ghana 
Approved
VIEWS 28
Generally, the manuscript is very good and relevant. However, the authors should consider the following:
  1. The discussion can be revised as some aspects lack clarity and are difficult to read and/or understand.
  2. The conclusion
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Amissah-Reynolds PK. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145917.r228642)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 2

    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the article.
    ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 13 Apr 2024
    LUISA CAROLINA GONZALEZ, Grupo de Investigación "Análisis de Muestras Biológicas y Forenses", Carrera de Laboratorio Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Riobamba, 060103, Ecuador
    13 Apr 2024
    Author Response
    Revisor 2

    We thank the reviewer for the importance has given to our research, the time spent correcting the manuscript, their knowledge, experience, and willingness to improve the article.
    ... Continue reading
Views
23
Cite
Reviewer Report 19 Dec 2023
Samar Al Nahhas, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Science, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria 
Approved
VIEWS 23
This study addresses an important knowledge gap regarding the prevalence of enteric parasites on fruits, vegetables and leafy green in an agricultural area of the Ecuadorian Andes. The study also indicated the necessity of dealing with these materials, which are ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Al Nahhas S. Reviewer Report For: Field study of parasitic contamination of fruits, vegetables and leafy greens in the Ecuadorian Andes [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research 2024, 12:532 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.145917.r221529)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 23 May 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.