ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Reimaging study in the management of blunt abdominal trauma in children: a low income country single center experience

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 15 Dec 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Introduction

The abdomen is the most prevalent site of primarily unidentified fatal injury after blunt trauma, and represents the third major affected part. However, follow-up strategies of intra-abdominal injuries remain controversial. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and who presented radiographic amendments in re-imaging studies and predict factors that could identify patients group requiring control in this population.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery and the intensive care unit of Monastir involving all patients under the age of 14 years old who were admitted for blunt abdominal trauma between January 2010 and December 2021.An analysis of epidemiological, clinical, radiological and therapeutic management characteristics were performed.

Results

A total of 151 patients were included in this study with a mean age of six years. The sex ratio (m/f) was 2.7. Most trauma circumstances were related to road accidents (43.7%) and falls (32.4%). The liver, the spleen, and the kidneys were the most frequently affected organs. A combination of intra-abdominal lesions was recorded in 32 cases. 84% of the cases (110/131) of the reimaged patients had no complications, compared to 16% (21/131) who developed intra-abdominal complications. The complicated reimaging findings were significantly associated with high grade hepatic and renal injuries (p=0.019 and 0.002, respectively), and patient symptom persistence or development (p=0.001).

Conclusion

It is safe to avoid performing reimaging studies if clinical progression remains uneventful in children with low-grade hepatic, splenic, and renal lesions. However, the clinical assessment is the most crucial consideration during BAT management in children.

Keywords

Abdominal trauma, Blunt, Children, Imaging, Follow-up

Revised Amendments from Version 1

In the second version, I made the changes required by the first reviewer as to precise some data and some changes in the introduction.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Paolo Aseni

Introduction

The abdomen is the third major affected part in children’s trauma and intra-abdominal lesions are, in over 80% of cases, closed.1 An early recognition of a severe injury is crucial to guide the subsequent management. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for stable or stabilized cases. It provides the ability to identify and assess the severity of intra and/or retroperitoneum lesions, according to the American Association for the Surgery of trauma guidelines (AAST).2 The conservative management is now standard in the solid visceral injuries (SVI) care. In fact, the distinctive physiological and anatomical features of children make this approach more available than in adults with a high successful rate (90–95%).3 After the first radiological assessment, follow-up imaging is controversial and raises several issues. According to the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) guidelines, the routine follow-up imaging for asymptomatic, low-grade solid visceral injuries in children is not indicated since there is no evidence of any lesion progression or complication in the major cases and medical management is seldom adjusted on follow-up imaging results.4 However, limited data are available to support the need for follow-up imaging for high grade injuries.5

Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study aiming to describe the characteristics of children with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) and presenting complications on reimaging studies, to assess the indication of systematic reimaging study and predict the factors that might identify patients requiring a control in this population.

Methods

Ethical statement

This study was a cross-sectional retrospective study. This study received retroactive approved by the Ethical Committee for Research at Faculty of Medicine of Monastir (approval number: IORG 0009738 No125/OMB 0990-0279). Patient consent for the use of data records was waived by the ethical committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Design and patients

This is a single center retrospective study carried out from January 2010 to December 2021 to examine the records of children with BAT admitted to the Pediatric Surgery Department and intensive care unit (ICU) at Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital Tunisia.

We included all patients younger than 14 years old, hospitalized for BAT associated or not to other concomitant body region injuries and who had undergone successful or unsuccessful non-operative management (NOM). The patients with penetrating traumas (four cases) or useless medical records (nine cases) were excluded.

The demographic characteristics, injury mechanism, physical examination; vital signs, abdominal and general exam, laboratory tests, imaging modality and findings were analyzed. Liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, and adrenal glands were regarded as SVI. The bowel (duodenal, jejunoileal) and mesentery were defined as hollow viscera injuries (HVI). The urologic injuries included bladder and ureteral lesions. The scoring scale of these lesions was assessed according to the AAST grade. Grades I, II, and III liver, spleen and kidney injuries and grade I and II pancreas injuries were classified as a low-grade, while grade IV and V liver, spleen, and kidney injuries and grade III, IV, and V pancreatic injuries were classified as a high-grade. The hemoperitoneum extent was characterized by the Federle score as large, moderate, or minimal.

Overall, traumatic children were treated according to the protocol as shown in Flowchart I. During hospitalization, the management ensures adherence to the patient’s needs including bed rest, regular clinical assessment of vital signs and abdominal status, hemoglobin measurements, pain management, null-per-os for at least 24 hours, imaging control, and blood transfusion: if hypotension, tachycardia (age-adjusted) or hemoglobin less than 7g/dl. Throughout the monitoring process, both clinical and imaging evolution thus follow-up were recorded.

Definition of groups and statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was realized by comparing two groups. Group one (G1) had no complication on reimaging controls and group two (G2) included patients with complications on reimaging studies (increased hemoperitoneum, occurrence of pseudoaneurysms, pseudocysts, perirenal hemato-urinoma expansion or infection, venous thrombosis, devascularized or hypotrophic organ) needing surgical or radiological intervention or additional tests.

A descriptive statistic was used to summarize patients, injuries grading, clinical and imaging characteristics. The data were summarized as counts and rates for categorical variables or mean for ordinal variables. A subset univariate analysis was done to assess complication rates in relation to the lesion grade of each SVI. Chi-Square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare results. The relationship between various variables and the complications identified in the reimaging studies was assessed using univariate analysis thus binary logistic regression. The calculations were made for the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A p value of 0.05 or lower was regarded as significant.

Results

A total of 151 patients were admitted to our department with BAT. The mean age was six years (range one- 13 years) with a high frequency between three and eight years old. Males were 111 (73.5%) and females 40 (26.4%) with sex ratio of 7:2. Trauma circumstances are described in Table 1.

Table 1. Trauma circumstances and consequences.

Isolated hemoperitoneumIntra-abdominal organ injuriesTotal
Motor-vehicle accidents95766
Fall64349
Household accident21719
Bicycle accident088
Direct trauma347
Sport accident022

The first physical examination showed abdominal tenderness in all cases. The hemodynamic status was unstable in only 10 cases requiring resuscitative efforts. Gross hematuria was noted in 16 cases. Extra-abdominal injuries were reported in 75 cases: thoracic trauma in 32 patients, limb injuries in 18 patients, head injuries in six patients, and various injuries in 19 others.

On laboratory tests, we found hemoglobin level under 8g/dl in six cases, and elevated liver enzymes and lipase in 41 and 13 cases respectively.

The abdominal US was performed in 44 cases and showed an isolated low-level hemoperitoneum in six cases, and a solid organ injury in 38 cases. CT scan was performed in 144 cases; 99 children (78%) had a single organic lesion. The most frequently damaged organs were the liver, the spleen, and the kidneys (Table 2), with median grade II (29/59), III (25/49), and III (14/26), respectively. Other organs were involved: pancreas (13), adrenal gland (eight), hollow viscera (four), and bladder (two). Additionally, various intra-abdominal lesions combinations were seen in 32 case (22%). The most frequent association was liver and spleen injuries (n=10) then spleen and kidney injuries (n=6). At the trauma event, the abdominal imaging revealed incidentally intra-abdominal pathologies: hydatid cysts in five cases (complicated in three cases), malignant tumor in three cases confirmed later by biopsy (neuroblastoma: one, Burkitt lymphoma: one, pseudopapillary and solid tumor of the pancreas: one) and obstructive uropathy (ureteropelvic junction obstruction) in two cases.

Table 2. Complications findings on the reimaging for BAT.

OrganNReimaged patientsGroup 1Group 2Management of complicationsP-value
LiverLow grade: 42
High grade: 17
41
17
39
12
2: Left hepatic artery branch PA
1: Left portal branch TH
5: Increased HP
1: Devascularized left lobe
1: Right portal branch TH
AG/AE
Anti-coagulant treatment
Laparotomy: peritoneal lavage + draining (hemostatic lesions) lobectomy of necrotic lobe
Anti-coagulant treatment
0.019
SpleenLow grade: 42
High grade: 7
38
7
38
7
0
0
--a
KidneyLow grade: 17
High grade: 9
16
9
16
4
0
2: Devascularized kidney
3: Expanding infected hematourinoma, with left anterior segmental artery PA in 1 case
NOM
Double J ureteral stent placement
AG/AE
0.002
PancreasLow grade: 5
High grade: 8
5
8
1
1
4: Pseudocysts
6: Pseudocysts
Percutaneous external drainage: 3 cases, Endoscopic internal drainage insertion of a double pigtail prosthesis: 4 cases
Observation: 2 asymptomatic cases
0.6
Adrenal glandLow grade: 8
High grade: 0
8
0
8
0
0
0
--a
Bowel4 (GI: 1, G II: 1)321: PneumoperitoneumLaparotomy-b
BladderG II: 2220-a
Isolated HP20770-a

35 (23%) patients were initially admitted to the ICU due to the severity of mechanism or organ injury (25 cases) and/or initial hemodynamic instability (10 cases). The mean length of stay (LOS) in ICU was four days (range 1–22 days). The remaining patients were admitted to the surgical ward with mean LOS of six days (range 1–140 days).

After primary resuscitation, two patients underwent initial operative intervention for pneumoperitoneum; jejunal perforation and a duodenal transection and three for complicated hydatid cysts.

NOM was firstly adopted in the other cases. During monitoring, 35 patients persisted or developed symptoms (abdominal pain or tenderness, fever and/or vomiting). A decrease in hemoglobin level more than 2 g was recorded in 35 cases, nineteen of them required blood transfusion.

Among the 151 included patients, 131 (86.7%) underwent reimaging studies. The first control was performed for a median of 5 days after trauma and had a median number of controls per patient of two (range 1–13 exams). In total, 21/131 (16%) patients had complications, three of them had more than one complicated organ, as described in Table 2. Using univariate analysis, initial unstable status (p=0.000), ICU primary admission (p=0.004), associated intra-abdominal lesions (p=0.007) patient symptom persistence or development (p=0.000), and a decrease in hemoglobin level greater than 2 g/dl (p=0.01) were statistically correlated to high rate of complications. On the multivariate analysis, as showed in Table 3, complicated reimaging findings were only associated with patients’ symptoms (p=0.001, OR=10.12).

Liver injuries

Four patients failed NOM and resuscitation. The reimaging study, performed for tachycardia and hemoglobin drop, revealed enlarged hemoperitoneum in three cases, and devascularized left liver with ongoing bleeding from the left portal vein in one case, required thus operative intervention. On the 15th day after surgery, one of them experienced a pseudoaneurysm (PA) dependent on the left hepatic artery branch. This patient underwent conservative treatment with imaging control until the PA was completely removed from the circulation around the 24th day. Angiography/angioembolization (AG/AE) was necessary in a grade III injury case that developed a pseudoaneurysm. Anti-coagulant treatment was prescribed in two cases of portal branch thrombosis; one of them developed cavernoma without portal hypertension. However, complicated reimaging findings were significantly correlated to high grade hepatic injuries (29.4% (5/17) of high-grade vs 5% (2/41) of low-grade, p=0.019).

Spleen injury

NOM was effective in all cases, with 100% of low and high-grade reimaged splenic lesions showing no complications on control, thus, no statistics were computed.

Kidney and urologic injuries

There were two patients with severe reno-vascular lesions due to the dissection of the right renal artery, and the left renal artery and venous thrombosis resulting in a non-enhancement of the right kidney. NOM was decided in both patients given the associated severe liver and spleen injuries. Both patients developed atrophic kidneys, without hypertension during the three years of follow-up. Therefore, the complicated reimaging findings were also significantly correlated to high grade renal injuries 55.5% of high-grade vs no complication in low-grade, p=0.002.

Two cases of extra-peritoneal bladder rupture were successfully treated by urinary drainage via a urethral catheter. The CT-scan with delayed phase imaging carried out one month later revealed no extra-bladder leakage.

Pancreas injury

The patient who initially had a grade IV pancreatic lesion associated with duodenal transection died two days later from severe post-traumatic pancreatitis and multiple organ failure. During the follow-up, 10 children developed pseudocysts. One child with grade IV lesion developed corporeal caudal pancreatic atrophy within one year, but no other long-term complications were observed. There were no significant differences detected among the patients with low and high-grade pancreatic lesions in terms of complication rates 87.5% of high-grade vs 80% of low-grade, p=0.6.

Hollow viscera injury

The patient with intramural hematoma complained of abdominal pain with distended and diffuse abdominal tenderness associated with septicemia four days after admission. The second CT revealed pneumoperitoneum. At exploration, there was a fecal peritonitis owing to two perforations. Reimaging studies conducted eight days following admission revealed the resorption of the mesenteric root hematoma.

Isolated hemoperitoneum

Seven patients (7/20) with an isolated hemoperitoneum required a re-imaging for persistent abdominal pain in three cases, for concomitant vomiting in two cases and for tachycardia associated with decreased hemoglobin (2 g/dl) in two cases. No radiological amendments were observed in all cases, and they were discharged after 48 hours.

Discussion

Our study explored the management and imaging follow-up of intra-abdominal injuries in children after BAT in low-resource setting. We are the only center in central Tunisia, managing BAT in children under 14 years. Conventionally, pediatric BAT requires close monitoring, based on physical examination and biological analysis, to assist prioritize the most appropriate treatments, as well as radiological control whenever necessary. In our center, we perform the radiological follow-ups especially in children living far from our center to ensure lesions have healed and no complications have occurred. In order to reduce imaging controls number and healthcare cost while ensuring patients’ safety, we analyzed the intra-abdominal complications rate after BAT based on injured organs and global clinical assessment.

Liver

The liver injury is one of the most common life-threatening injuries in children trauma,6 and the most severely affected organ in our series. The successful rate of NOM is being expanded by endovascular procedures (AG/AE) in case of an active bleeding (contrast blush).3,4 However, in stable status, the presence of a contrast blush on the initial CT scan is not an absolute indication for the AG/AE and serial clinical evaluations through physical exams and laboratory testing must be performed to detect a change in clinical status during NOM.4 While routine follow-up imaging in children is clearly not indicated and the category of patients who might benefit has not been obviously defined, a small number of patients with grade IV or V liver injury have shown significant complications.5,7

We performed a follow-up imaging in 98.3% (58/59) of hepatic injury cases, for a clinical indication in 27 cases and routine control in 31 cases. It showed a stabilization or healing signs in 88% of cases and complications in 12%.

We observed that the high rate of complications was statistically correlated with the high-grade hepatic lesion. The rate of post-trauma liver-related complications is greater in our results than that reported in the literature which generally varies from 0% to 7.4%.8,9

In fact, some authors identify the presence of an active contrast extravasation as an independent predictor for a pseudo aneurysm formation in children, regardless of the injury grade. They suggest a follow-up during NOM of these patients, so as to obtain an early identification and angiographic treatment of pseudoaneurysm.10 In our study, one patient required AE and one resolved spontaneously.

In addition to the high-grade injury, centrally located liver injuries are significant risk factors for major bile duct injury and complications.11,12

Given our findings, we suggest that the imaging controls be performed in all symptomatic patients with or without modified laboratory tests, regardless of the severity of the lesion, and systematically in patients with high-grade and central liver lesions on pre-discharge and 2 to 3 weeks post-discharge, and then it will depend on control findings.

Spleen

The splenic injury was the second most injured organ in our series, while it is the most frequent in the pediatric trauma according to the literature.13 NOM is based on a close clinical monitoring with the assessments of the hemoglobin and the hematocrit levels every 12–24 h if no complication occurs.13

In our series, 34.6% of cases had associated lesions and 14% had high-grade injuries; all patients were successfully treated with NOM and no complications were documented in the reimaged patients. Most studies showed a low rate of complications in pediatric patients with post-traumatic splenic injuries, particularly low-grade ones.5 Therefore, follow-up imaging cannot be considered mandatory for low-grade and uncomplicated injuries or asymptomatic patients, but it may be considered in high-grade injuries for the risk of developing life-threatening complications.13 In fact, the risks of delayed splenic rupture and posttraumatic pseudocysts seem to be increased within the first one to three weeks13,14 with an incidence of 0.2 and 5–13%, respectively.15,16 The 2022 WSES consensus preconizes, imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) before return to major physical activity in children with AAST grades III–V splenic injuries treated observantly although the repeated imaging in children is rarely needed in the acute phase during NOM.14 The patients with low- and high-grade injuries didn’t develop any complications. Thus, we propose reimaging before discharge and return to scholar activity.

Kidney and urologic tract

The kidney is affected in 10% of all BAT.17 The isolated urinary extravasation, in itself, is not an absolute contra-indication to NOM, and the presence of non-viable tissue (devascularized kidney) is not an indication to operative management in the acute setting in the absence of other indications for laparotomy.18 In our study, the renal trauma involved 17% of patients. Most cases presented low-grade injuries (17/26), and were observantly managed. In fact, the complication rate after blunt renal injury has been estimated at 3-30%.19 No issues were documented in low-grade cases. A high-grade lesion, observed in 35% of cases, was strongly associated with the high complication rate reported on follow-up imaging in our series. Indeed, low-grade kidney injuries have a very low rate of late complication in pediatric patients; therefore, scheduled imaging follow-up is not indicated.18 Follow-up imaging in pediatric patients should be limited to moderate (AAST III) and severe (AAST IV-V) injuries. In pediatric patients, US and CEUS should be the first choice in the early and delayed follow-up phases, if cross-sectional imaging is required, magnetic resonance should be preferred.18 Some authors preconize periodical monitoring of the injury to rule out complications. They recommended time points range from four-24 hours to 48 to 72 hours following the initial scan.20,21 However, the usefulness of this measure in asymptomatic children has not been satisfactorily proven.22 Some also propose imaging follow-up 3 months following trauma, though there is no unanimous consensus on this.23 Moreover, periodically examine patients with high-grade injuries should be performed in order to rule out the development of hypertension.22

Our results concur with the literature data, therefore we propose US/CEUS follow-up imaging for renal high-grade and urologic tract injuries on the third day if the patient is still asymptomatic and at two, six, and 12 weeks after the injury.

Pancreas

Pediatric pancreatic injury is rare, with an incidence of 0.6 to 9.5% of all abdominal injuries,24,25 which is similar to our results and represents 8.6%.

CT-scan is usually the first-line imaging tool in the assessment of late complications of pancreatic trauma and very useful in driving management.26 However, US or CEUS is used as an alternative to CT for follow up of fluid collections, pseudocysts, and pancreatic disruptions after pancreatic trauma mainly in children or in low-resource settings.26 Furthermore, regular followed up at two, four, eight and 12 weeks to monitor serum amylase, lipase and blood glucose, as well as to perform the abdominal US was also mentioned.27 In fact, in low resource settings, amylase and lipase, in combination with US, can be considered cost-effective tool of patient risk stratification.28 Otherwise, WSES recommend that the necessity for follow-up imaging should be driven by clinical symptoms (i.e., onset of abdominal distention, tenderness, fever, vomiting, jaundice). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is also useful for obtaining an exact diagnosis and determining the status of the main pancreatic duct and location of the pancreatic injury and plan management strategies.29

Hollow viscera

Patients with hollow viscera and mesenteric injuries account for 2–6% of BAT, and more often cause clinical uncertainty,30,31 because even the hemoperitoneum can lead to an abdominal tenderness. Usually, the pneumoperitoneum detected on CT scan requires an operative management. However, due to the diagnostic complexity and the lack of agreed consensus on clinical management of patients with hollow viscera injury, surgical intervention is often delayed.32

Our work has some limitations as it is a retrospective study involving information bias. Additionally, the contemporary, and the worldwide recommendations were not followed while treating our patients. Therefore, it is anticipated that prospective studies with updated and adopted guidelines, including management and imaging follow-up, will really be carried out and assessed.

Conclusion

For the pediatric surgeons, the management of blunt abdominal injuries in children remains controversial and challenging. There are various recommendations for monitoring and radiological follow-up strategies that are firstly dependent on the organ involved, and the severity of the injury (lesion grade). Actually, it is safe to avoid performing reimaging studies if the clinical progression remains uneventful in children with low-grade hepatic, splenic, and renal lesions. Absolutely, the clinical assessment is the most crucial consideration during BAT management in children. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Ben Youssef S, Mesaoud M, Ben fredj M et al. Reimaging study in the management of blunt abdominal trauma in children: a low income country single center experience [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:805 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133509.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 15 Dec 2023
Revised
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Jan 2025
Hamid Osman, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia 
Approved
VIEWS 1
The manuscript is well written with scientific clear language
Aim described clearly and I recommend to say assessment instead of describe at aim part in the abstract because description very difficult to measure.
Introduction is so short you ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Osman H. Reviewer Report For: Reimaging study in the management of blunt abdominal trauma in children: a low income country single center experience [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:805 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157433.r361242)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2023
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Aug 2023
Paolo Aseni, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
The authors of the article deserve my congratulation for reporting this interesting experience in treating blunt abdominal trauma in children in low-income countries.

Here are some suggestions to improve the paper:
  1. Clarify your
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Aseni P. Reviewer Report For: Reimaging study in the management of blunt abdominal trauma in children: a low income country single center experience [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:805 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.146504.r190025)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 15 Dec 2023
    Sabrine Ben Youssef, Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
    15 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    Firtst of all, I want to thank you for your interest for our study. I will respond to your comments one by one.
    1- We agree with this point. We ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 15 Dec 2023
    Sabrine Ben Youssef, Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
    15 Dec 2023
    Author Response
    Firtst of all, I want to thank you for your interest for our study. I will respond to your comments one by one.
    1- We agree with this point. We ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 10 Jul 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.