ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Outcome analysis of posterior cruciate ligament injuries

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2023
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research collection.

Abstract

Background - The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), a major stabiliser of the knee, restrains the posterior translation of tibia over femur. Injury to the two bundles of this ligament is usually seen in a motor vehicle accident, followed by dashboard injury.
Methods - Non-operative management post posterior cruciate ligament tears includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and rehabilitation. Common surgical procedures include trans-tibial tunnel or tibial inlay technique of graft reconstruction, single bundle or double bundle reconstruction. Literature on outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament injuries managed with either of the methods is sparse; we therefore aim to conduct an interventional study to analyse the patients’ functional status and satisfaction post treatment.
Conclusions - Lysholm knee scoring scale and IKDC knee scoring system will be used as outcome measures. The follow up scores are taken 6, 12, 15 and 24 months after the treatment.
CTRI registration: REF/2023/06/068422

Keywords

Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Autologous Tendon Graft, Posterior Drawer Test, Outcome Analysis

Introduction

Background and rationale

In the knee joint complex, cruciate ligaments are of great importance as they provide maximal restrain to the translation of tibia over the femur.1 The posterior cruciate ligament with its attachment at the antero-lateral aspect of medial condyle of femur proximally and distally at the tibial plateau, gives primary restrain to posterior translation of tibia over femur.2 It, to some extent, also works to resist the valgus and varus forces.3 Injury to this ligament occurs less often than to the other cruciate ligament of the knee complex. It has a cross sectional area of 11-13 mm2, making it twice as thick as the anterior cruciate ligament and a tensile strength of 739 to 1627 Newton.4

A posteriorly directed strong force is required to damage both the postero-medial and antero-lateral bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and this usually occurs with knee in flexion.5 Dashboard injuries following motor vehicle accidents are the most common causative factors.6 Additionally, falling forward onto a flexed knee might result in PCL damage. In baseball, football, skiing and rugby, PCL injuries are the most frequent sports-related injuries. Less frequently, harm to the knee joint might result from a rotational hyperextension injury.7,8

Injury to this ligament accounts for only 20% of the ligament injuries of the knee. PCL sprains or tears usually occur with the involvement of other ligaments, making isolated PCL injuries a rare occurrence.9 A study conducted in 2003 stated that motor vehicle accidents and sport injuries account for 45% and 40% of PCL injuries respectively, with the average age of receiving these injuries being 27 years old. Falls on a flexed knee with foot plantar flexed accounted for 24%.10,11

The ligament is further divided into two parts: the antero-lateral bundle, making up 65% of the ligament, and the postero-medial bundle, making up 35%.12 The postero-medial bundle is taut with knee in extension and the anterolateral bundle is taut in knee flexion.13 It provides greatest restrain between 30-90 degrees of knee flexion.14 Since injuries to the flexion are more common, the anterolateral bundle is more susceptible to sprains and tears,15 although literature on pure isolated injuries of the two bundles is scarce.16 The middle geniculate artery supplies blood to the PCL, which also is innervated by the tibial nerve.17 At 90 degrees, 95% of the posterior translational forces are absorbed by the PCL.18 The postero-lateral joint capsule, popliteus, medial collateral ligament, and posterior oblique ligament also helps to prevent posterior translation of tibia over femur.19

Management for grade I and II sprains where only a proportion of fibres are involved includes rehabilitation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Surgical treatment includes ligament reconstruction using either hamstring, peroneus or bone patellar tendon bone graft.2022

Objectives

The primary objective of the study is to assess the functional, clinical and radiological outcome of posterior cruciate ligament injuries managed surgically. The secondary objectives of the study are to study the aetiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries, and to assess any complications associated with management modalities.

Protocol

Registration

This trial has been registered with CTRI (REF/2023/06/068422).

Trial design

This is a single group type of trial with participants being surgically managed for PCL injuries. The framework of the trial is superiority and exploratory. This is a hospital-based experimental study.

Participants

The study will be conducted in Department of Orthopaedics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMC) and Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. Included in the study will be all skeletally matured patients of age 25 years and above, both male and female, with symptoms and traumatic PCL injuries planned for surgical management. Exclusion criteria will be patients with injuries to the PCL who will be managed conservatively, injuries to the PCL that have infectious foci, tumour conditions, osteoarthritic changes, and congenital and metabolic disorders.

Interventions

A pre-intervention assessment will be done, taking detailed clinical history with assessment pro-forma, clinical examination, and radiological tests such as X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as all routine examination like complete blood count, liver function tests, kidney function test, random blood sugar, chest X-ray, electrocardiogram and with functional parameters. Pre-anaesthetic check-up, part preparation and physician fitness will be obtained for each patient. Arthroscopic PCL reconstruction with double-bundle graft23 surgery will be performed, and the expected duration of the surgery will be two to three hours. Patients will be arranged supine on the operating table. Under all aseptic precautions and antibiotic prophylaxis, the site to be operated on will be prepared thoroughly keeping the knee joint in flexion. A tourniquet applied around the proximal thigh will be inflated. Arthroscopic portals will be placed and a scope inserted to visualise the PCL tear. Regarding the type of graft used (auto-graft), if the patient has a PCL avulsion fracture then interference cc screw will be used; if they have a single PCL injury then a hamstring graft, i.e. semitendinosus and semimembranosus graft will be used, and if they have a multi ligament injury then a peroneus tertius graft will be used. Similar considerations will be given to the anaesthesia used: if the participant has an avulsion and single ligament injury then spinal anaesthesia will be given, and if they have a multi ligament injury then spinal and epidural anaesthesia will be given. Arthroscopic tunnels will be positioned with graft in place using endobutton loop and fixed with interference screw or suture disc. A thorough wash will be given, closure to be done in layers with sterile dressing in situ and long knee brace21 will be applied before moving the patient to the recovery ward for observation. Pre and intra-operative discontinuation or modifications will be considered as per the participant’s request and possible improvement or worsening of their condition. Post-intervention, all assessments will be repeated using clinical examination, pro-forma, radiological findings and with functional parameters. Post-operatively Mass General Brigham rehabilitation protocol for PCL reconstruction will be followed. Clinical, radiological and functional results of PCL injuries will help to investigate the causes and to evaluate any problems related to treatment options and any complications associated with it. The participants enrolled in the study will be followed up for post-operative assessment at intervals of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and then 2 years.

Outcomes

Primary outcome measures

  • 1. Lysholm knee scoring scale24 (Figure 1)

    This will be administrated to evaluate functional status, specifically instability post knee ligament surgeries. It consists of eight items: limp, support, locking, pain, and swelling, instability, climbing stairs and squatting. An arbitrary score with a decreasing value for each item is given. The sum of each score for the 8 items is recorded. A maximum possible score of 100 indicates no symptom and disability and a score of less than 64 indicates poor status.

  • 2. IKDC knee scoring system25 (Figure 2)

    This is a knee specific, patient reported outcome measure that assesses an individual’s knee related symptoms (7 items), functions (2 items) and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).

23df20e1-62e0-4bc8-965b-b4a717c2dd17_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Lysholm knee scoring scale.

23df20e1-62e0-4bc8-965b-b4a717c2dd17_figure2.gif

Figure 2. IKDC knee scoring system.

Secondary outcome measures

  • 1. Visual examination

    This includes gait examination, instability and any abnormal swelling. Additionally, the Sag test will be conducted to compare the affected and non-affected side.

  • 2. Muscular strength and range of motion

    Muscle strength and range of motion assessment will be done using a muscle strength grading system, and range of motion assessment will be done using a goniometer assessment.

  • 3. Additional tests

    These include scoring and measurements from the posterior drawer test, varus and valgus tests, and dial test.

  • 4. Radiological findings

    These include X-ray and MRI of the knee joint.

Sample size

The sample size formula (Daniel, 1999) is used,26 which is

n=Z2P1P/d2

If the population is more than 10,000 where,

Z = statistic for a level of confidence. (For the level of confidence of 95%, which is conventional, Z value is 1.96).

P = expected prevalence or proportion i.e. prevalence of PCL injuries in India = 2.76% = 0.0276.27

d = precision or desired error of margin = 7% = 0.07

n=1.9620.027610.02760.072=21.04=25patients needed in the study

Statistical methods: Student’s t-test, one way ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Data collection, management and analysis

A total of 25 participants will be enrolled in the study who meet the inclusion criteria. All the participants will be educated about the purpose of the research, will then undergo the pre-study assessment and will complete clinical and radiological tests as described above. They will also undergo the Lysholm knee scoring scale and the IKDC knee scoring system, and the baseline data will be noted for each participant. The participants will be followed up for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 2 years from the treatment, as is suitable for the patient and the researcher. On every follow up, complications, if any, will be noted and managed appropriately. All the relevant statistical data will be collected pre, intra, and post-operatively along with follow up data which will be recorded for each of the outcome measures (Figure 3). The obtained data will then be tabulated in an Excel sheet and a master chart will be created, and later be used for statistical analysis. To carry out the statistical analysis, SPSS version 27 software will be used. The analysis will be done considering the desired error of margin and confidence interval of 95%.

23df20e1-62e0-4bc8-965b-b4a717c2dd17_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Study design.

This protocol is addressed in accordance with SPIRIT reporting guidelines.28

Dissemination

This study will be published in indexed journal.

Study status

Data collection has not yet started.

Discussion

The main aim of this study is to produce an outcome analysis of the participants’ PCL injuries. This is a clinical trial protocol carried out in the Department of Orthopaedics in Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. As the prevalence and occurrence of PCL injuries are now increasing, and there are various treatment options available, it is necessary to investigate the outcome analysis of PCL injuries.23,29,30

The Lysholm knee scoring scale and the IKDC knee scoring system have different domains for the assessment of quality and function of the knee joint. The scales include items on the patient’s satisfaction and expectation with functional parameters related to the knee joint health. Assessment using these scales will tell us about success of the performed PCL surgeries.31,32

Using the data obtained from the measurement of pre and post-study scoring scales, we will perform statistical analysis and compare the analyses for different PCL outcomes.33,34

Limitations of this study include small sample size, single centre study, and short duration of study.

Ethical considerations

This research protocol received approval from the institutional ethical committee of the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (approval number ECR/440/Inst/MH/2013/RR-2019) on 18/07/2022.

All participants will be educated about the purpose of the research. Written and verbal informed consent will be obtained from all the participants by the principal investigator prior to the intervention. Procedures in this study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as referenced in 2008.

The study material will be considered to be confidential documents and will be safely stored with access only to the principal investigator.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2023
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Suneja A, Deshpande S, Jadawala V and Goel S. Outcome analysis of posterior cruciate ligament injuries [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:842 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.134461.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2023
Views
9
Cite
Reviewer Report 10 Nov 2023
Si Heng Sharon Tan, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital Sports Centre, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 9
This is a well-written protocol for the analysis of outcomes following surgical management for posterior cruciate ligament injuries. It is a protocol for a single-arm study, and the sample size calculated is also for a single-arm study, therefore while it ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Tan SHS. Reviewer Report For: Outcome analysis of posterior cruciate ligament injuries [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2023, 12:842 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.147519.r210698)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Anmol Suneja, Orthopaedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, India
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    This is a single arm study to find the difference in outcomes for pre & post evaluation after operative procedure. The cases that we are taking are having lesser prevalance, ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 22 Mar 2024
    Anmol Suneja, Orthopaedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, 442001, India
    22 Mar 2024
    Author Response
    This is a single arm study to find the difference in outcomes for pre & post evaluation after operative procedure. The cases that we are taking are having lesser prevalance, ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2023
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.