Keywords
Social Support, Self-efficiency, Academic stress, psychological well-being, Public and Private Universities
Academic stress is a significant factor affecting students’ psychological well-being, particularly in higher education. Understanding the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy can provide insights into how these factors influence students’ psychological well-being in public and private universities.
The study examined the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu, Somalia. Utilizing a stratified sampling technique, data were collected from 663 students across public (52.6%) and private (47.4%) universities through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using path analysis to assess direct and indirect effects. Structural equation modeling technique was used for data analysis.
The analysis revealed a significant direct effect of academic stress on psychological well-being (β = 0.087, p = 0.001). Social support was significantly related to Academic stress (β = 0.117, p = 0.031) and self-efficacy (β =0.088, p = 0.021). However, both social support (β = 0.099, p = 0.000) and self-efficacy (β = 0.646, p = 0.000) were significantly related to psychological well-being. The mediating analysis showed that social support partially mediated the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (Indirect effect = 0.012, CI [0.002, 0.024], p = 0.000), while self-efficacy did not mediate this relationship (Indirect effect = 0.057, CI [0.006, 0.111], p = 0.068).
The findings suggest a significant positive impact of academic stress on psychological well-being, while social support partially mediates this relationship, highlighting its buffering role. Conversely, self-efficacy, although positively contributing to psychological well-being, does not mediate the effect of academic stress. These results underscore the importance of robust social support systems and targeted interventions to enhance students’ coping mechanisms and overall psychological well-being. Study limitations and implication are discussed.
Social Support, Self-efficiency, Academic stress, psychological well-being, Public and Private Universities
This revised version of the manuscript presents substantial improvements in response to the reviewer’s comments and suggestions. The most significant change involves the Introduction section, which has been thoroughly revised to include clear definitions of all key study variables—namely academic stress, psychological well-being, social support, and self-efficacy. These definitions provide clarity and ensure a stronger conceptual foundation for the study.
Additionally, the structure of the Introduction and Literature Review sections has been reorganized to enhance coherence and logical flow. The revised version now presents a more seamless integration between theoretical frameworks—specifically, the Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping and the Social Cognitive Theory—and the variables under investigation. This realignment better supports the formulation of research hypotheses and the study’s overall purpose.
A notable enhancement is the incorporation of recent scholarly work, particularly the systematic review by Javaid et al. (2024) on eudaimonic well-being among young adults. This reference deepens the discussion of the outcome variable—psychological well-being—by highlighting contemporary influencing factors and extending the relevance of the study beyond the local context.
Furthermore, minor language refinements and formatting adjustments have been made throughout the document to improve readability, academic tone, and alignment with publication standards.
In summary, this revised manuscript addresses the initial concerns regarding clarity, structure, and depth of literature by offering a more cohesive, conceptually grounded, and up-to-date exploration of the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy on academic stress and psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu, Somalia.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nguyen Tan Dat
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Zartashia Kynat Javaid
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Somaya Shokry Mohammad Mahmoud
Stress is one of the most crucial concerns in psychological research due to its substantial impact on individuals' health and well-being. In academic environments, academic stress—the stress experienced by students due to educational demands—has been found to adversely affect students’ psychological well-being. This form of stress emerges from a variety of challenges such as academic workload, exams, performance pressure, and deadlines. Students often report symptoms such as depression, anxiety, insomnia, poor sleep quality, and even substance abuse and self-harm, which directly harm their mental health.1
Academic stress refers to the psychological distress arising from academic obligations, such as maintaining grades, meeting deadlines, and managing peer and parental expectations. It is often intensified by inadequate coping mechanisms, low time management skills, and fear of failure.2–4 Moreover, stress can lead to various negative consequences, such as smoking behavior, mental health issues, poor sleep quality, depression, insomnia, substance addiction, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. Contributing factors include self-inflicted stress, parental expectations, academic queries, lack of time for revision, low parental education levels, poor exam grades, family pressures, scholarship demands, financial burdens, classroom competition, time management challenges, and course-related stress.2,3,5–9
Psychological well-being, in this context, refers to an individual’s overall mental state characterized by emotional balance, purpose in life, personal growth, and positive functioning. According Ref. 10 eudaimonic well-being—a deeper form of psychological well-being—encompasses factors such as autonomy, personal growth, purpose, and positive relationships. Their systematic review highlights that students’ psychological well-being is influenced by both internal and external factors, including stress levels, self-beliefs, and social networks. To mitigate the harmful consequences of academic stress, students often rely on coping mechanisms such as self-efficacy and social support. Self-efficacy is defined as an individual's belief in their capacity to succeed in specific situations or accomplish a task.11 Higher academic self-efficacy enables students to handle stress more effectively and maintain psychological resilience. Social support refers to the emotional, informational, and instrumental assistance received from family, peers, and educators.12 It serves as a buffer that protects individuals from the adverse effects of stress.
Despite the growing attention to stress symptoms among students, relatively fewer studies have investigated protective factors such as self-efficacy and social support in relation to academic stress and mental health outcomes. Educational institutions should develop interventions to reduce stress and support students in managing academic pressures to protect their mental health.13–15 Understanding how these factors mediate the impact of stress is critical for designing effective interventions.
The current study aims to explore the mediating roles of self-efficacy and social support in the relationship between academic stress and students’ psychological well-being. To guide this inquiry, the study draws upon two foundational theories: Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping, which emphasizes how individuals appraise and respond to stress; Social Cognitive Theory, which highlights the influence of self-efficacy and social context on individual behavior and well-being.
This research fills an important gap in the literature by integrating these frameworks to investigate the complex interplay between academic stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological well-being in the context of university students in Mogadishu, Somalia.
The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, proposed by Ref. 16, focuses on how individuals assess and response to stress through cognitive appraisal and cognitive processes. stress is the result of transactions between the person, environment, and situation, influenced by cognitive appraisals and coping strategies. This model highlights how students perceive academic stressors (primary appraisal) and their perceived ability to manage them (secondary appraisal), which in turn determine their psychological outcomes.17,18
The Social Cognitive Theory, proposed by Ref. 19, emphasizes the role of cognitive processes in shaping behavior and outcomes. this means that persons’ beliefs about their ability to succeed (self-efficacy) influence their behavior and reactions to challenging situations. In the context of academic stress, this theory suggests that the students have the ability to cope with high self-efficacy are more likely to effectively cope with stressors and maintain their psychological well-being. Social Cognitive Theory also considers the impact of social influences and observational learning on individuals’ coping.20
The Transactional Theory of Stress and Coping and the Social Cognitive Theory emphasize the importance of cognitive appraisal in how students perceive and respond to academic stress. Factors such as students’ evaluations of stressors, self-efficacy, and social support significantly influence their stress experiences and overall psychological well-being.21
In coping mechanism, the theories emphasize the importance of coping strategies in managing stress. Student performance related to cognitive appraisals and self-efficacy beliefs play an important role in mediating the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being. Effective strategies, supported by social resources, help students manage academic stress and maintain well-being.13,18,22
Academic stress has become a major mental health concern across the worldwide these days. Also has emerged as a significant mental health that affecting various groups of students. Studies,6,9 have highlighted the detrimental impact of academic stress on mental well-being, with associations found between high levels of academic stress and issues like depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidal ideation.
Academic stress among university students has been extensively studied, revealing various insights. According to research, there is a strong link between mental health and academic stress7 with self-inflicted stress being a prominent factor in high stress levels among students. Critical thinking skills were found not to have a significant relationship with academic stress.15 However, academic stress was positively correlated with academic performance, motivating students to study harder.23 Academic stress significantly impacts the mental well-being of university students.3,19,23 High levels of academic stress have been linked to increased probability of experiencing mental health issues like Weakening Mental Health.17
A study found a strong correlation (r = 0.582) between academic stress and psychological well-being among university students, indicating that higher stress levels correspond to lower well-being.20 Furthermore, according to Ref. 10 psychological well-being, particularly eudaimonic well-being, includes autonomy, purpose in life, and personal growth, all of which are often undermined by sustained academic stress. Their systematic review highlights that academic environments can both challenge and support these dimensions depending on the level of stress and availability of coping resources.
Social support plays a crucial role in mediating academic stress and enhancing students’ psychological well-being. Studies25,26 indicated that social support from various sources like family, friends, and significant others positively correlates with happiness, subjective well-being, satisfaction with life, and flourishing among university students.
The impact of social support on students’ levels of academic stress is significant. Studies reveal a negative relationship between academic stress and parental social support, with more encouragement resulting into reduced stress levels.21 Additionally, perceived social support from various sources like family, friends, and significant others has been found to significantly correlate with reduced stress levels among undergraduate Health Sciences students.20 Moreover, teacher support at the individual level is associated with better coping abilities and lower helplessness, while peer support at the class level is linked to enhanced coping abilities and academic achievement.27 Furthermore, peer social support has been shown to lower academic stress levels during online learning, highlighting its importance in helping students deal with the challenges of virtual education.28,29
Self-efficacy plays an important role in mediating the relationship between academic stress and students’ psychological well-being. Studies have shown Refs. 29, 30 that higher levels of academic self-efficacy are associated with greater well-being, while academic stress tends to lead to psychological distress, such as symptoms of anxiety and depression. Additionally, factors like social support and mindfulness have been identified as mediating variables that influence academic self-efficacy in the face of psychological distress, ultimately impacting students’ well-being.
Self-efficacy plays an essential role in influencing academic performance across various educational settings. Research indicates that self-efficacy positively impacts academic achievement.31 It acts as a predictor of academic success and can mitigate academic burnout, reduce dropout rates, and enhance engagement.32 Moreover, self-efficacy mediates the relationship between parental expectations, academic stress, and performance, emphasizing its significance in academic outcomes. The correlation between self-efficacy and academic performance is particularly evident in vocational high school students, where self-efficacy significantly influences academic success. Overall, enhancing self-efficacy levels is vital for improving academic performance and student outcomes in various educational domains, highlighting the importance of fostering self-belief and confidence in learners.
Both the Transactional Theory and Social Cognitive Theory provide a comprehensive framework for examining the interplay between academic stress, self-efficacy, social support, and psychological well-being. Cognitive appraisal processes, supported by self-beliefs and social contexts, determine how stress is experienced and managed. Therefore, examining the mediating roles of self-efficacy and social support can deepen our understanding of how to support students' mental health and academic success. Therefore, the need to study the relationship between Academic stress on Student’s Psychological well-being, the following hypothesis is suggested.
Based on the above discussion the researchers proposed the following hypotheses:
There is a significant impact of academic stress on psychological well-being,
There is a significant impact of academic stress on social support.
There is a significant impact of academic stress on self-efficacy.
There is a significant impact of social support on psychological well-being,
There is a significant impact of self-efficacy on psychological well-being.
Social supports mediate the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being.
Self-efficacy mediates the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being ( Figure 1).
The context of the study was university students in Mogadishu – Somalia. Nearly 50,000 students are intended in these universities. These universities have fields of study at undergraduate, diploma and postgraduate levels. Faculties provided these universities include social science, computer technology, public health, business Economics and management sciences, sharia and law studies, education, engineering, medicine and surgery, Arts & humanities, agriculture & Environmental Sciences, languages, Islamic studies, geology, media & journalism, public admin and politics dentistry and postgraduate studies. The population of the study are target population from which the sample is actually selected or aggregation of study elements. The study population are undergraduate students of these universities, its estimated around 30,000 students. The study included stratified sample technique. Stratified sample technique is type of sampling method in which the total population is divided into smaller groups or strata to complete the sampling process.33 The study examined various factors related to academic stress and psychological well-being. The sample includes 663 students, with a gender distribution of 40.4% female and 59.6% male.
A survey questionnaire was developed as the instrument for data collection. Items used for Academic Stress adapted by Ref. 34 to get students’ views of academic pressures and consists of 10 items, Psychological well-being Scale (PWS) adapted by Ref. 25 and consist of 18 items, Social Support Scale (SSS) adapted by Ref. 35 and 12 items, Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) adapted by Ref. 36 and consist of 10 items.
Data collected using adopted questionnaires distributed electronically, depending on the feasibility and preferences of participants. The questionnaire comprised validated measures assessing academic stress, psychological well-being, social support, and self-efficacy. Additionally, demographic information such as age, gender, academic major, and university affiliation collected to facilitate subgroup analyses. The data collected from May 15 to Jun 3 2024.
Descriptive statistics used to characterize the sample and examine the distribution of key variables. Structural equation modeling was used to examine mediating analysis of social support, self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress, and psychological well-being. AMOS – SPSS 22 was used to estimate the measurement model, structural model as well as mediating analysis based on a 5000-bootstrap method of social support, self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress, and psychological well-being.
Prior to data collection, ethical approval was received from Mogadishu University institutional review board (IRB) in Mogadishu, Somalia (Date:15 – 05 – 2024, protocol number: MUIRB/09/24/001). Informed consent was obtained from all students. The students were informed that the research would be conducted following the principle of confidentiality and that all information obtained would be kept confidential. We obtained informed consent from all participants, according to the IRB’s guidelines. Each of the 663 participants reviewed and signed the consent form before participating in the study. We confirm that all participants adhered to the signed consent form.
A total of 663 sample size was achieved, the demographic profile of respondents for this study showed that female respondents made up 40.4%, of the sample while male made up 59.6% and mostly aged 18 to 21 years 67.1%. The distribution between public (52.6%) and private (47.4%) universities is nearly even. Most students are in their first three years of study, with Year One students representing the largest group 36.2%, while there are few students in Year Five (0.9%) and Year Six (1.2%) ( Table 1).
Measurement model
The results indicate strong reliability and validity across the constructs, as evidenced by the factor loadings, squared multiple correlations (SMC), and Cronbach’s alpha values. The factor loadings range from 0.595 to 0.855, with most indicators exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.6, demonstrating significant contributions to their respective constructs and indicating good convergent validity.37 The SMC values range from 0.354 to 0.731, indicating that the latent constructs explain a reasonable proportion of the variance in their indicators. Cronbach’s alpha values are consistently above the recommended threshold of 0.7,38 ranging from 0.755 to 0.906, confirming good internal consistency for all constructs. Similarly, the composite reliability (CR) values for all constructs are above the recommended threshold, suggesting good internal consistency. However, the average AVE values for the academic stress (0.399) and psychological well-being (0.487) constructs are below the recommended threshold of 0.50, indicating that these constructs may not be capturing a sufficient amount of variance in their respective indicators. The correlation matrix reveals moderate to strong relationships between the constructs, with the highest correlation observed between self-efficacy factor and psychological well-being (0.814), suggesting a strong positive association between these two variables. Overall, the results provide insights into the psychometric properties of the measured constructs and their interrelationships within the study context. The discriminant validity was achieved. The result presented in Tables 2 and 3.
CR | AVE | SEF | AS | SSF | PWB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SES | 0.843 | 0.574 | 0.758 | |||
AS | 0.768 | 0.399 | 0.068 | 0.631 | ||
SSF | 0.906 | 0.706 | 0.516 | 0.076 | 0.840 | |
PWB | 0.825 | 0.487 | 0.814 | 0.189 | 0.430 | 0.698 |
Structural model
The structural model illustrates the relationships among the constructs in the proposed study framework. H1 indicates that academic stress significantly negative impacts students’ psychological well-being. The findings revealed that academic stress has significant negative impact (total effect) on psychological well-being (β = 0.870, t = 3.287, p < 0.001). Hence, H1 supported. However, higher academic stress corresponds to lower psychological well-being, it could indicate that manageable levels of academic stress serve as a motivator or enhance students' resilience, ultimately contributing positively to their psychological well-being. H2 reveals a weak but significant positive relationship between social support factors (SSF) and academic stress (AS) (β = 0.088, t = 2.314, p = 0.021). H2 supported, similarly, H3 demonstrates a weak positive relationship between social support factors (SSF) and psychological well-being (PWB) (β = 0.099, t = 5.278, p < 0.0001). Finally, H4 highlights a strong positive relationship between self-efficacy scale (SES) and psychological well-being (PWB) (β = 0.646, t = 24.278, p < 0.0001). The result presents in the Table 4.
Path coefficient | T statistics | P values | |
---|---|---|---|
H1: AS➔PWB | 0.870 | 3.287 | 0.001 |
H2: SSF➔AS | 0.088 | 2.314 | 0.021 |
H3: SSF➔PWB | 0.099 | 5.278 | 0.000 |
H4: SES➔PWB | 0.646 | 24.278 | 0.000 |
Mediation analysis
The results demonstrate the mediating roles of social support factors (SSF) and self-efficacy scale (SES) in the relationship between academic stress (AS) and psychological well-being (PWB). For the AS → SSF → PWB relationship, academic stress has a significant direct effect on PWB (β = 0.117), and the indirect effect through SSF is small but statistically significant (β = 0.012, p = 0.041). The confidence interval [0.002, 0.024] does not include zero, indicating reliable partial mediation. This suggests that social support factors play an important role in buffering the effects of academic stress on psychological well-being. In contrast, for the AS → SEF → PWB relationship, academic stress has a weaker direct effect on PWB (β = 0.088). Although the indirect effect through SEF is significant (β = 0.057, p = 0.068), the confidence interval [0.006, 0.111] includes zero, indicating no substantial mediation. This implies that while self-efficacy is influenced by academic stress, it does not meaningfully mediate the connection between academic stress and psychological well-being. These findings highlight the critical role of social support in mitigating the negative impacts of academic stress, whereas self-efficacy may have a limited mediating effect. Mediation analysis summary is presented in Table 5 and Figure 2.
Relationship | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Confidence interval | P-value | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bounded | Upper Bound | |||||
AS->SSF->PWB | 0.117 | 0.012 | Partial Mediation | |||
AS->SEF->PWB | 0.088 | 0.057 | No Mediation |
Evaluation model fit
The model evaluation results indicate a good fit of the model to the data. The relative chi-square (2.537) is within the recommended threshold of less than 5, and all the fit indices, including the Goodness of Fit Index (0.948), Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (0.931), Comparative Fit Index (0.962), Incremental Fit Index (0.963), Normed Fit Index (0.940), Tucker-Lewis Index (0.955), and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (0.048), meet or exceed their respective recommended thresholds. Additionally, the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (0.0369) is within the recommended limit of less than 0.05,39,40 further supporting the good fit of the model ( Table 7).
The study is set out to establish the relationship between academic stress (AS), student’s psychological well-being (PWB), social support factor (SSF) and self-efficacy scale (SES). The study found a significant impact of academic stress on student psychological well-being among public and universities in Mogadishu - Somalia. The outcomes affirm this recommendation are steady with the discoveries of the past examinations where the positive relationship between academic stress (AS) and psychological well-being (PWB) outcomes was found.28,29,41 This relationship indicates that the pressures of academic demands, such as exams and assignments, can lead to negative psychological outcomes, including anxiety and decreased life satisfaction. The findings align with the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, which suggests that stress occurs when individuals perceive demands exceeding their coping abilities. The unique socio-cultural and educational challenges in Somalia, such as limited resources and high expectations, may intensify the effects of academic stress, emphasizing the need for support systems and interventions to help students manage stress and improve their psychological well-being.
The study found insignificant impact of academic stress on social support factor, suggesting that academic stress does not significantly alter the level of social support students perceive or receive. This result may indicate that social support, whether from peers, family, or faculty, remains stable despite fluctuations in academic stress levels. Previous research has shown that while social support can buffer the effects of stress, the presence of stress does not necessarily reduce the availability or perception of social support.28,29,41
This stability might be due to cultural or social norms that encourage strong support networks, regardless of individual stress levels. Additionally, social support might be more influenced by factors such as personal relationships and community dynamics rather than academic pressures.
The study found that academic stress had an insignificant impact on self-efficacy among students in university students in Mogadishu. This suggests that the students’ belief in their ability to manage and succeed in academic tasks was not significantly affected by the levels of academic stress they experienced. This finding is inconsistent with research indicating that self-efficacy is often a stable trait influenced more by long-term experiences and personal characteristics than by situational stress.30,42 Self-efficacy may be bolstered by intrinsic factors such as past successes, individual resilience, and consistent encouragement from mentors and peers, which help maintain students’ confidence in their abilities despite academic pressures.
The study found that social support significantly impacts psychological well-being (PWB) among students in university students in Mogadishu. This means that students who receive higher levels of social support from peers, family, and faculty tend to have better psychological well-being, experiencing less anxiety and higher life satisfaction. This finding aligns with previous research which indicates that social support acts as a buffer against stress and promotes mental health by providing emotional comfort, practical assistance, and a sense of belonging.31–33 The presence of a strong support network can mitigate the adverse effects of stress and enhance overall well-being by improving coping mechanisms and providing resources for managing academic challenges.
The study found that self-efficacy significantly impacts psychological well-being (PWB) among students in university students in Mogadishu. This indicates that students who have a strong belief in their ability to manage and succeed in academic tasks tend to have better psychological well-being, with lower levels of anxiety and higher life satisfaction. This finding is supported by previous research showing that self-efficacy enhances mental health by promoting resilience, reducing stress, and encouraging proactive coping strategies.44,46,47 High self-efficacy helps students to perceive challenges as manageable and to maintain a positive outlook, which contributes to better psychological well-being.
Finally, the results of this research offer important empirical insight into the indirect effect on academic stress on psychological well-being through mediation of social support factor. The finding shows that social support partially mediation the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being. This consistent with the previous finding which have found the significant mediating role of social support35,48,49 which suggests that social support can mitigate the harmful effects of stress by providing emotional comfort, practical help, and a sense of belonging, thus enhancing overall psychological well-being. On other hand, the study found that self-efficacy does not mediate the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (PWB) among students in Mogadishu’s universities. This means that while self-efficacy directly contributes to better psychological well-being, it does not significantly alter the impact of academic stress on well-being. This finding contrasts with some studies that suggest self-efficacy can buffer stress impacts35 indicating that in this context, other factors may play a more significant role in mediating the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being.
In conclusion, the study reveals several key findings about the relationships between academic stress, psychological well-being (PWB), social support, and self-efficacy among students in Mogadishu’s universities. Academic stress significantly impacts students’ psychological well-being, highlighting the need for interventions to manage academic pressures. Social support plays a critical role in partially mediating this relationship, buffering some of the negative effects of academic stress on mental health. In contrast, self-efficacy, while positively contributing to psychological well-being, does not mediate the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (PWB). These insights underscore the importance of enhancing social support networks and developing targeted strategies to improve student resilience and mental health in the face of academic challenges.
Universities should prioritize the development and enhancement of student support services, including counseling and mental health resources, to help students manage academic stress and improve psychological well-being. More broadly, the study contributes to the development of studies linking academic stress, social support, self -efficacy and psychological well-being and strengthens the relationship evidence in the literature that social support contributes to psychological well-being. Institutions should encourage the formation of strong social networks through peer mentoring, student organizations, and community-building activities, as social support is crucial in buffering the negative effects of academic stress. Although self-efficacy does not mediate the stress-well-being relationship, enhancing students’ confidence in their abilities through workshops, positive feedback, and opportunities for skill development can directly improve their psychological well-being. Additionally, the study adds knowledge to studies seeking to understand the factors that influence psychological well-being. Thus, the findings suggest that universities should develop and implement stress management programs that equip students with strategies to cope with academic demands, thus improving their psychological well-being. Institutions should promote social support systems through peer mentoring, counseling services, and community-building activities to buffer students against the negative effects of academic stress. Institutions should promote social support systems through peer mentoring, counseling services, and community-building activities to buffer students against the negative effects of academic stress. Educational policies should prioritize mental health by incorporating stress management and support systems into the academic environment, ensuring holistic student development. Finally, it’s important that educational policymakers should integrate mental health education and stress management strategies into the curriculum, ensuring students are equipped with the tools to handle academic pressures effectively.
The study’s limitations include its cross-sectional design, which limits causal inference, and the reliance on self-reported measures, which may introduce biases. Additionally, the findings are context-specific to Mogadishu, Somalia, and may not be generalizable to other settings. The research also focused narrowly on social support and self-efficacy as mediators, potentially overlooking other influential factors. Future studies should explore other potential mediators and moderators in the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being, such as coping styles, resilience, and environmental factors, to develop a more comprehensive understanding and targeted interventions.
Figshare: Mediating role of Social Support and Self-efficacy on Academic stress and Student’s Psychological well-being among University students in Mogadishu -Somalia. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2682074550
The project contains the following data:
Figshare: Mediating role of Social Support and Self-efficacy on Academic stress and Student’s Psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu-Somalia. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2682074550
The project contains the following data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Spiritual Counseling, Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Mental Health
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Applied Psychology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
References
1. Javaid, Z. K., Batool, H., Fatima, N., Muneer, A., & Azam, S. (2024). Eudaimonic well-being among young adults: A systematic review of influencing factors and outcomes. Journal of Policy Research, 10(2), 46-57.Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Applied Psychology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Findivia Egga Fahruni, Ach. Sudrajad Nurismawan, Nabila Salma Salsabila: How Do School Counselors Advocate for Gifted and Intelligent Children in Junior High School?. Bisma The Journal of Counseling. 2022; 6 (3): 329-334 Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Clinical psychology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Educational Psycholgy
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Version 3 (revision) 30 May 25 |
read | read | ||
Version 2 (revision) 13 Feb 25 |
read | |||
Version 1 30 Sep 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)