ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Podiatry risk in diabetic pilgrims: a prospective study in Tunisia

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 14 Oct 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background

Each year, over 340,000 diabetic patients across the world travel to Saudi Arabia for the Hajj pilgrimage. As they carried out important rituals, several complications might be encountered, particularly foot lesions. We’ve been therefore interested, through this study, in the assessment of podiatric risk in diabetic pilgrims.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in the region of Sousse, Tunisia. The evaluation of diabetic patients preparing for the pilgrimage was conducted in two phases, before and after the pilgrimage.

Results

Forty-three diabetic patients planning to perform pilgrimage were included in the study. Post-pilgrimage clinical exams revealed hyperkeratosis (96.8%) and superficial fungal infections (61.3%) as the most common podiatric lesions. Foot ulcers attributed to trauma from walking were found in 7% of patients. Our data showed a significant association between foot ulcer risk and lower total cholesterol (p=0.02), HDL cholesterol (p=0.02), LDL cholesterol (p=0.01), as well as higher triglyceride levels (p=0.04) only in univariate analysis. Other diabetes-related risk factors did not show significant correlations.

Conclusion

Given the increased risk of foot lesions in diabetic pilgrims, a thorough assessment and tailored management based on individual risk levels are essential before, during, and after the pilgrimage.

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus, Education, Foot Injuries, Pilgrimage, Risk Factors

Introduction

The Hajj pilgrimage is one of the five pillars of Islam. Every practicing Muslim is bound by faith to do it at least once in his life if he is physically and financially capable. During the journey to Mecca for Hajj, pilgrims perform a series of religious rituals, including barefoot circuits around the holy mosque - Tawaf - and walk between two hills, Safa and Marwah, for long hours. They are also required to spend five days in tents in the Mina Valley where sanitation is very basic, in a hot climate, where the average temperatures can reach 45 °C in the summer.1

The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is estimated at 10.5% and this prevalence increases with age.2 Given that approximately 2 million Muslims perform the pilgrimage each year, many of them are aged 60 and above, it was projected that the number of pilgrims with diabetes could surpass 340,000 annually.3,4

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by various complications, including retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes complications affecting the lower limbs are common, complex, and costly.5 People with diabetes are exposed to a range of complications during the pilgrimage, with diabetic foot reported once to be one of the most common causes of admissions in two pilgrimage site hospitals.6 However, few studies have studied the podiatry risk in pilgrims with diabetes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of foot lesions in diabetic pilgrims and to assess the degree of knowledge of diabetic subjects regarding podiatric risk.

Methods

Study design and patients

A prospective longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted on diabetic individuals from Sousse, Tunisia, and consisted of two phases, before and after the pilgrimage. It included patients who planned to undertake the pilgrimage in 2019 and consulted the Endocrinology-Diabetology department of Farhat Hached University Hospital of Sousse. All participants gave informed consent to participate in the research and for publication.

The exclusion criteria were patients with a major amputation such as mid-leg or mid-thigh, non-autonomous patients using a wheelchair, or those with a severe deformation of the feet as clubfoot or Charcot’s foot.

Study variables and data collection

The evaluation was made before and after the pilgrimage. It was based on an anamnesis, a general somatic examination, and a foot examination. The evaluation of peripheral neuropathy was made using the Semmes-Weinstein 10g monofilament test and the DN4 score.

Peripheral arteriopathy was assessed by calculating the arm-ankle index using a pocket Doppler ultrasound machine. A blood test was also requested, including fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), renal and lipid blood tests. The grade of podiatric risk was specified for each patient, based on the classification of “The International Working Group on The Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)”.7

Knowledge of diabetic foot risks and its preventive measures were evaluated through a survey consisting of 16 questions. Each question was noted 1 if the answer was “Yes”, and 0 if the answer was “No”. A score from 0 to 16 was then determined for each patient which helped to avoid information biases (Figure 1).

939a8a6b-8bd6-4ac6-b240-062eefe9b746_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Knowledge and preventive measures score for diabetic foot.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GNU PSPP V2.0.0 software, a free statistical analysis package (https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/). Patients who were lost to follow up were not included in the analysis. Data between groups were compared using χ2-Test (2-sided), and Mann-Whitney U test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the patients

The study involved 43 patients with a sex ratio (male:female) of 0.72 (Table 1). The average age of patients was 62.5±5.4 years. Most patients (65.15%) had high education levels, while 11.6% were illiterate. Associated comorbidities were dominated by hypertension in 55.8% of cases and 18.6% of patients received treatment with statins.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the diabetic patients included in the study.

CharacteristicsFrequency (Percentage)
Gender
 Male18 (41.9%)
 Female25 (58.1%)
Age (year)
 <553 (7%)
 56−6010 (23.25%)
 61−6517 (39.5%)
 >6613 (30.25%)
Education levels
 Illiterate5 (11.6%)
 Elementary school10 (23.25%)
 High school18 (41.9%)
 University10 (23.25%)
Socioeconomic levels
 Medium39 (90.7%)
 High4 (9.3%)

Characteristics of diabetes in the patients

All patients in the study had type 2 diabetes mellitus. The average course of diabetes was 12.5±9.3 years (Table 2). Thirty patients (69.75%) were on oral antidiabetic drugs and 25.65% were on insulin. Most patients (74.4%) had good therapeutic compliance with treatments and the diabetes was controlled in 61.5% of cases with an average A1C of 7.9±1.3%.

Table 2. Characteristics of diabetes in the forty-three patients included in the study.

CharacteristicsFrequency (Percentage)
Diabetes duration (years)
 <513 (30.25%)
 6−1516 (37.2%)
 16−259 (20.95%)
 >265 (11.6%)
Follow-up
 Irregular14 (32.6%)
 General practitioner13 (30.2%)
 Endocrinologist16 (37.2%)
Diabetes treatments
 Only dietary measurement2 (4.7%)
 Metformin (monotherapy)19 (44.1%)
 Metformin and sulfonylureas9 (20.95%)
 Insulin (monotherapy)2 (4.7%)
 Oral antidiabetic agents and insulin9 (20.95%)
 Other oral antidiabetic agents2 (4.7%)
A1C levels (%) (42/43)
 <6.56 (14.3%)
 6.6−7.512 (28.6%)
 7.6−915 (35.7%)
 >99 (21.4%)

Evaluation of diabetic foot education level

Only 20.9% of patients reported that they had received at least one podiatry risk education session from their attending physician. When assessing practical knowledge, the average level of knowledge was 8.3±3.4 out of 16 (Figure 2).

939a8a6b-8bd6-4ac6-b240-062eefe9b746_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Boxplot of the knowledge and preventive measures score for diabetic foot.

Clinical examination of diabetic feet before the pilgrimage

The clinical exam before the pilgrimage showed that the most frequent podiatric lesions were hyperkeratosis (88.1%), heel cracks (34.9%) as well as superficial fungal infections (60.4%). The most frequent foot deformities were flat feet (30.2%), hallux valgus (23%), and claw toes (16.2%).

Ischemia and neuropathy were noted in 30.2% and 18.6% of patients respectively.

Most patients (48.8%) had grade 0 podiatry risk according to the classification of the IWGDF and only one patient had a grade 3 due to a history of a foot ulcer (Table 3).

Table 3. Podiatry risk grade in diabetic patients before the pilgrimage.

GradeFrequency (Percentage)
Grade 021 (48.8%)
Grade 110 (23.3%)
Grade 211 (25.6%)
Grade 31 (2.3%)

Clinical examination of diabetic feet after the pilgrimage

The evaluation after the pilgrimage concerned 31 patients. The remaining 12 patients were lost to follow-up. The clinical exam showed that hyperkeratosis was the most common form of podiatric lesions (96.8%) as well as fungal infections of the nails and inter-toe spaces (61.3%).

The occurrence of superficial fungal infection of the foot was significantly correlated with the history of inter-toe fungal infection or onychomycosis (p=0.03). However, it wasn’t correlated with glycemic control or with anti-diabetic treatment.

Three patients had foot ulcers which were mainly due to walking injuries and unsuitable shoes (Figure 3). Hospitalization was indicated in only one case of foot ulcer with infection signs, but he refused so that he could perform the rituals and he was given oral antibiotics.

939a8a6b-8bd6-4ac6-b240-062eefe9b746_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Podiatric lesions in three diabetic patients during the pilgrimage.

Note: Patient 1 (A) presented an ulceration in the big toe (purple arrow), second toe (green arrow), and next to the first metatarsal (orange arrow). Patient 2 (B) had dry gangrene in the second toe. Foot ulcer before (C) and after (D) debridement in patient 3.

The study of the risk of developing a foot ulcer showed that it was significantly associated with lower total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol and a higher triglyceride level (p respectively 0.02, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.04) (Table 4).

Table 4. Assessment of risk factors for the occurrence of a foot ulcer in Tunisian diabetic patients during pilgrimage.

CharacteristicsFoot ulcer
YesNop
Age (years)63.6±4.962.5±4.80.63a
Length of diabetes (years)20.0±6.512.1±9.40.14a
Tobacco50%16.6%0.42b
Body mass index (kg/m2)30.9±5.928.9±4.20.89a
Glycated hemoglobin (%)9.2±2.57.7±1.20.29a
Cholesterol (mmol/L)2.8±0.24.4±10.02*a
Triglycerides (mmol/L)2.0±0.51.3±0.70.04*a
HDL-cholesterol (g/L)0.3±0.10.4±0.10.02*a
LDL-cholesterol (g/L)0.4±0.10.9±0.30.01*a

a Analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test.

b Analyzed using χ2-Test (2-sided).

* Statistically significant at p=0.05.

Furthermore, the risk of developing a foot ulcer was not correlated with age, tobacco, or body mass index (Table 4). The study of other risk factors linked to diabetes (length of diabetes, insulin treatment, A1C, existence of neuropathy or ischemia, grade of podiatric risk, and level of knowledge) did not show significant correlations.

A binary logistic regression was performed to define independent predictors of the occurrence of a foot ulcer (variables with p < 0.2 were included). In multivariate analysis, no factor was significantly correlated to a higher risk of foot ulcer.

However, there was a significant increase in the systolic pressure index in the left as well as the right foot after the pilgrimage (1.03±0.19 vs 1.11±0.19 and 1.03±0.28 vs 1.11±0.18, p <0.05).

Discussion

During the Hajj pilgrimage, Muslims are required to perform physically strenuous rituals in crowded and hot environments, which can present significant challenges, especially for individuals with pre-existing health conditions such as diabetes mellitus. The combination of these factors increases the risk of foot lesions, particularly among those with diabetic neuropathy.8

Foot injuries represented an important part of the reasons for admissions among diabetic patients.9 A study carried out in tertiary care facilities in Saudi Arabia, to assess the causes of admissions, showed that 31.9% of a total 689 emergency patients had diabetes.10 In our study, hospitalization was indicated in only one case.

Diabetic foot ulcers are commonly caused by repetitive stress on areas that are susceptible to strong vertical or shear stress in patients with diabetic neuropathy. The addition of peripheral arterial disease further contributes to the development of foot ulcers.11 Our study revealed that ischemia and neuropathy were present in 30.2% and 18.6% of patients, respectively. Plantar hyperkeratosis was observed in 88.1% of the population. These findings underscore the importance of addressing both neuropathy and arterial disease in the prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

It has been demonstrated that education on the autonomous management of diabetes and its complications is effective in achieving therapeutic goals. Patients who have not received this education are four times more likely to develop complications compared to those who have.12 Moreover, educational interventions can reduce the risk of amputation by up to 85% and decrease the associated cost of care.13

Only 20.9% of our patients have received therapeutic education regarding podiatric risks. This percentage varied greatly between countries. In developed countries, most patients receive information and practical advice for preventing diabetic foot complications, with rates as high as 71.3% in the United Kingdom.14 In developing countries, the therapeutic education rate was lower, with only 48% of patients in Tanzania for example.15

This lack of education was also reported by Alfelali et al.16 in a study that included 197 subjects and where only 30% of diabetic patients benefited from at least one education session before the pilgrimage. It was suggested that a health education strategy is effective in improving knowledge and practice, as well as in reducing the incidence of health problems among pilgrims.17

Our study revealed also that the most common foot lesions among diabetic patients after returning from pilgrimage were hyperkeratosis (96.8%) and superficial fungal infections (61.3%). A foot ulcer was noted in three cases. In the study of Alfelali et al.,16 blisters and erythema were the most common lesions in diabetic as well as non-diabetic patients. In addition, hyperkeratosis was comparatively more frequent in diabetic pilgrims and more likely to be complicated by a foot ulcer. The absence of blisters and erythema lesions in our study group may be attributed to the timing of the clinical examination, which occurred 15 days to one month after the return of pilgrims from Hajj.

Regarding infections, fungal and bacterial ones are reported to be more prevalent, particularly in pilgrims with unbalanced diabetes and unhealthy lifestyles.18 Fungal foot infections were found to be more common in patients taking anti-diabetic medications compared to those using insulin.19 However, in our research, fungal infections were found to be only linked to a history of inter-toe infection or onychomycosis. There was no correlation between these infections and diabetes control, or treatment used.

The conducted survey did not reveal any significant correlations between the occurrence of foot ulcers and the duration of diabetes, gender, insulin intake, body mass index, average A1C levels, or a history of foot ulcers. This aligns with findings from several studies showing the absence of a correlation between the duration of diabetes, insulin treatment, weight excess, and foot ulcer development.20,21 Other studies reported that men and history of foot ulcers did raise the risk of developing foot lesions and that risk was tripled in case of A1C level beyond 9%.2224

However, our study has shown an association between the occurrence of a foot ulcer and lipid profile abnormalities. In fact, patients, who had a foot ulcer, had significantly lower total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, this could be explained by the fact that these patients were at high cardiovascular risk and were already on statin therapy. They also had a higher triglyceride level and a lower HDL cholesterol rate. Even so, in multivariate analysis, no factor was significantly correlated with a higher risk of foot ulcer. The correlation between the occurrence of a foot ulcer and total cholesterol level was reported in the study by Porciúncula et al.25 Nevertheless, a correlation with other abnormalities in the lipid profile has not been demonstrated.25,26

The small sample size and the loss to follow-up after returning from pilgrimage were the main limitations of our study. The assessment of microvascular diabetes complications among pilgrims was not conducted due to time constraints.

In summary, the Hajj pilgrimage poses a potential risk of foot injuries for diabetic pilgrims, which could significantly impact their health and well-being. Therefore, an assessment of all patients before the pilgrimage is necessary, not only to ensure glycemic control but also to prevent diabetes-related complications. Prioritizing education on podiatric care is essential for diabetic patients who are considering the pilgrimage to mitigate the risk of foot-related complications and guarantee a successful pilgrimage experience.

Ethics and consent

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Sousse (Ref: CEFMS 24/2019) with date of approval 17/07/2019. Consent to participate and to publish: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Oct 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
HASNI Y, ELFEKIH H, SALAH A et al. Podiatry risk in diabetic pilgrims: a prospective study in Tunisia [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:1226 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.156345.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 14 Oct 2024
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 27 Nov 2024
Salim Parker, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 3
The study concept and design is good. The major drawbacks are the small sample size, the significant post Hajj loss of follow up (it may affect the results significantly) and some inconsistency in reporting. It needs some significant revisions as ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Parker S. Reviewer Report For: Podiatry risk in diabetic pilgrims: a prospective study in Tunisia [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:1226 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.171641.r338749)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 25 Nov 2024
Yaasirah Mohomed Choonara, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Gauteng, South Africa 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 3
1. Relevance: The study addresses an important public health issue for diabetic patients participating in Hajj, a unique and understudied population.
2. Structured Methodology: The prospective longitudinal design and the evaluation of patients both before and after the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Choonara YM. Reviewer Report For: Podiatry risk in diabetic pilgrims: a prospective study in Tunisia [version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2024, 13:1226 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.171641.r331985)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Oct 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.