Keywords
Arterial pulse–tapping artifact, electrocardiographic artifact, pseudo-myocardial infarction.
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) can be affected by various factors and technical problems. It is rare for an artefact to be the cause of ST-segment elevation, especially in asymptomatic patients. An important distinction between true ST segment elevation caused by myocardial infarction and an artefact is that the baseline elevation in an artefact may begin before or after the appearance of the QRS complex. When confronted with an abnormal ECG with suspicious waveform contours and possibly only one completely normal limb leads, the diagnosis of arterial pulse artefact should be considered. It is important to exclude subjective assessments unless they are clearly labelled as such.
Arterial pulse–tapping artifact, electrocardiographic artifact, pseudo-myocardial infarction.
We made some changes in the Introduction (reformulated phrase) corrections in references and some details in Discussion.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Koji Takahashi
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Nihal Sheriff
It should be noted that artefacts on an electrocardiogram can result from a variety of causes, both internal and external. These include muscle tremors, the use of dry electrode gel and loose leads, and electromagnetic interference. These artifacts can sometimes mimic ECG abnormalities, which can cause problems for patient care.
In this report, we describe an unusual ECG artifact that caused large and bizarre T-waves on the ECG. The observed changes are aligned with those commonly associated with primary repolarisation changes characteristic of acute coronary syndrome. The artefact in question is caused by the overlapping of the artery pulse; this can be avoided by moving the lead away from the pulsating artery. This is also known as the electromechanical association artefact.
A 68-year-old man with no medical history and no cardiovascular risk factors consulted the emergency department of a district hospital due to 48 hours of atypical and paroxysmal chest pain (tingling). His physical examination revealed no abnormalities, with SBP at 120 mmHg, DBP at 50 mmHg, HR at 99 bpm, RR at 20/min, Sat O2 at 96% on air, T° at 37°C, and finger blood sugar at 0.9 g/l.
Figure 1 shows the patient’s first ECG.
The 12-lead ECG revealed a normal sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 80 beats per minute and normal axis. Abnormal T waves with bizarre morphology were observed in leads I, II, aVL, aVR, aVF, and from V1 to V6 in precordial leads. This abnormality was also observed in all the leads except for lead III. The emergency department physician’s interpretation of the T waves was that they were indicative of an ischaemic hyperacute condition. The patient was transferred to the emergency department (ED) at the university hospital due to suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, the ECG performed in the ED was completely normal ( Figure 2), and the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels were twice negative.
In blood investigations no cirrhosis or severe anemia were observed. An investigation for hyperthyroidism was not done but no history of hyperthyroidism for our patient. An echocardiography was done in the emergency room without abnormality.
Therefore, the pre-hospital ECGs were recognized as artifacts, and the patient was discharged home.
In this case, the electrocardiogram (ECG) showed anomalous T waves with unusual morphology in leads I, II, aVL, aVR, aVF, and V1 to V6. This distinct pattern was observed in the 12-lead ECG, with the exception of lead III. The presence of an arterial pulse-tapping artifact, also known as electromechanical association (EMA) or Aslanger’s sign, was indicated by the synchronous occurrence of this abnormality with the cardiac cycle. Aslanger initially described this phenomenon,1 which some authors refer to as Aslanger’s sign.2
The EMA artifact arises from the transmission of arterial pulsations, typically from the radial artery but also from the posterior tibial artery particularly in hyper dynamic states,3 onto the lead clips, generating aberrations in the ECG waveform. Contemporary electrocardiogram machines only record lead I and lead II, deriving the waveforms for other leads from these two. However, the majority of limb leads and augmented leads are susceptible to artifact. A consistent feature of EMA artifacts is the sparing of one lead, contingent on the limb generating the artifact. This serves as a crucial diagnostic clue, as outlined by Aslanger.4 In this case, lead III was unaffected as it represents an ECG recording between the left arm and left leg. Therefore, we concluded that the source of the artifact was the right arm. When the clip was placed proximally during a repeat ECG in the emergency department, the 12-lead ECG exhibited no artifacts.
Aslanger’s sign has been recently described and there are limited reported cases in the literature. It is important to emphasise the potential risks associated with this condition, as it can mimic symptoms of acute coronary syndrome. This can lead to unnecessary invasive investigations if not promptly recognised. The artifact, induced by the mechanical tapping of the pulse on the ECG electrode, is in synchrony with the cardiac cycle and can manifest as ST segment changes (elevation or depression) accompanied by peculiar T waves.3,5
This report presents a case of Aslanger sign, also known as arterial pulse-tapping ECG artifact. This anomaly presents as a primary repolarisation abnormality that is comparable to those observed in acute coronary syndrome.
It is important to be aware that an EMA artefact will almost always spare one of the limb leads, as this is a key factor in diagnosing it, which helps physicians avoid misinterpretation and unnecessary explorations.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: ECG
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
References
1. Aslanger E, Bjerregaard P: Mystery of “bizarre electrocardiogram” solved. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2011; 44 (6): 810-811 Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Partly
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Partly
References
1. Takahashi K, Yamamura N, Yoshino M, Enomoto D, et al.: Unfamiliar waveforms spanning from the ST to TP segments only observed in certain limb leads of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram due to Aslanger' s sign.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023; 20 (9): 693-696 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: ECG
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 27 Nov 24 |
read | read |
Version 1 15 Oct 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)