ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Relationship between physical activity, body posture and morbidity risk in the elderly population

[version 2; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 04 Nov 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

Physical activity plays a crucial role in the health and well-being of older adults, positively influencing various aspects of their quality of life. This study aims to explore the relationship between physical activity and body segments, as well as the risk indices of non-communicable chronic diseases in healthy elderly individuals.

Methods

The analyzed variables include weekly physical activity, the Postural Correction Index (PCI), measured using the system developed by Portland State University (PSU), and predictors of non-communicable chronic diseases assessed through body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio.

Results

The results reveal a moderate positive relationship between physical activity and the PCI (r=0.45; p≤0.05), with significant correlations in specific components of the PCI, such as thoracic depression (r=0.51; p<0.01), anteroposterior shoulder alignment (r=0.51; p<0.01), and upper back (r=0.53; p<0.001).

Conclusions

It is concluded that physical activity has a significant positive impact on the posture of older adults, particularly in the trunk, contributing 40% to the improvement of PCI components. The PCI values obtained, exceeding 84.67 in men and 82.67 in women according to the PSU evaluation, underscore the effectiveness of physical activity in postural correction and the prevention of issues associated with chronic diseases.

Keywords

Orthostatic position, NCDs, elderly, physical exercise

Revised Amendments from Version 1

We have changed the letters to italics for the r and p values. Additionally, we adjusted the scale values between male and female, as they had been reversed.

Introduction

Physical activity (PA) is defined as any movement performed by the skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure, which in turn acts as a deterrent to various diseases, particularly chronic non-communicable diseases.1 Several studies have consistently shown that regular physical activity in older adults enhances physical, cognitive, and functional states, while reducing the risk of frailty by preserving effort capacity and muscle tone.2 Specific physical activities, such as resistance exercise and strength training, can further augment these benefits.3 Therefore, regular physical activity should be promoted as a priority for the elderly, both for public health and rehabilitation purposes.4

Body posture is an inherent characteristic of human beings, and is present throughout their entire life, from birth to old age. The comfortableness people experience is conditioned by the arrangement of body segments relative to each other in space, which provides comfort, harmony, efficiency, and support, in both dynamic and static positions.5 Research on body posture in the elderly has been a popular subject of study, and has demonstrated that physical activity influences orthostatic positions, as well as improved sitting posture, vertical alignment, and balance.6 Other studies have highlighted the importance of posture in the elderly with respect to fall prevention and balance, where study results have shown that individuals who suffer falls tend to have poorer balance in the standing position and a more deficient body posture.7

Physical activity across different ages, especially among the elderly, plays a crucial role in the prevention and management of chronic diseases, which are currently regarded as the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide.8,9 Regular daily physical activity is associated with the prevention and reduction of cardiovascular diseases, type-2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer, obesity, and depression. Moreover, even small sessions of moderate weekly physical activity can significantly reduce the risk of chronic diseases.10 Moderate to vigorous physical activity is particularly beneficial, and higher levels are linked to lower mortality risks, especially from cardiovascular diseases.11,12 The literature reports numerous benefits of physical activity, even when practiced modestly, emphasizing that any amount of PA is better than none, which encourages daily practice among populations due to its benefits.12 Conversely, sedentary behavior is associated with higher risks of chronic diseases and hospitalization, representing a high-cost factor for governments.9,11

Some studies have found small correlations between postural patterns and levels of physical activity.13 However, to date, no studies have verified the relationship between physical activity, body segments, and variables that measure morbid diseases in the elderly. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between physical activity, body segments, and risk indices for morbid diseases in healthy elderly individuals.

Methods

Study design

This is a descriptive, observational, and correlational study conducted to analyze postural characteristics and risk measurement variables with respect to non-communicable chronic diseases, along with their relationship to physical activity in an elderly population. The study was approved under Resolution 8430/1993 by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia and by the Ethics Committee of Universidad Santo Tomás de Valdivia (Chile) with number 188 MZS;1364.2024, following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants

A total of 38 older adults from the “Potrerito” sports group in the city of Bello (Antioquia, Colombia) participated in this study. The participants usually engage in weekly physical activity focused on conditional physical capacities, with training sessions lasting 60 minutes throughout the week. Of the total participants, 28.9% were men and 71.1% were women. The inclusion criteria for the study required participants to be healthy individuals without recent injuries or bodily limitations in the past six months, and to voluntarily agree to participate in the study. The sociodemographic characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and anthropometric of the study population.

Female (n=27)Male (n=11)
Height (cm)155 (147; 164)#170 (162; 176)#
Age (Years)65.52 ± 6.4466.82 ± 6.60
Weight (kg)65.69 ± 10.1572.25 ± 9.28
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)27.39 ± 3.9325.20 ± 3.18
Waist (cm)87.35 ± 11.6590.36 ± 9.87
Hip (cm)104.07 ± 15.0097.00 ± 7.71
Waist-Hip Ratio (WHR)0.84 ± 0.06*0.93 ± 0.09*
Postural correction Index (%)75.31 ± 12.9179.27 ± 7.71
Physical activity (days)1.56 ± 1.991.36 ± 2.38
PCI percentiles by gender
25th percentile70.6773.33
50th percentile78.6781.33
75th percentile82.6784.67

# p≤0.05 Mann-Whitney U test.

* p≤0.05 Student’s t test.

Instruments and procedures

Two interventions were carried out for the execution of the study. The first intervention involved an interview to collect sociodemographic data from the participants, including gender, age, and weekly physical activity. The second intervention included the assessment of variables related to body posture using the Portland State University (PSU) instrument.14,15 To identify morbid risk, height and body mass variables were used to calculate the Body Mass Index (BMI), as well as waist and hip circumferences, to determine the waist-to-hip ratio. Before the tests began, the participants were provided with an informed consent document outlining the benefits and potential risks of the study, emphasizing the commitment to maintaining their anonymity. They were informed that photographs would be used exclusively for research purposes and that their data would be processed using codes to safeguard their identity. Evaluations were conducted after the participants read the document and had all their questions addressed, at which point they signed the informed consent form.

Evaluation of measurement variables and morbid risk

The evaluations were conducted starting at 7:00 am, from January 2nd to February 8th, 2024, at the times previously agreed upon with each participant. The protocol for data collection was developed according to the guidelines of the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) and was carried out by a Level 3 anthropometrist. The following measurements were taken: height, using a wall stadiometer (Height o meter®, model Est-221HR, McCook, USA), with an accuracy of 0.5 cm, with the participants in an orthostatic position, feet together, back in contact with the stadiometer, and head in the Frankfort plane, applying traction on the head during the measurement; body weight, with a digital scale (OMRON®, model HBF-226, Kyoto, Japan), with the participants standing on the scale, looking forward and with their arms at their sides; and body circumferences, with the participants positioned on a 40 cm high anthropometric box, with their arms crossed over their chest.

Waist circumference was measured at the narrowest point of the abdomen, between the lower lateral costal margin and the top of the iliac crest, while hip circumference was measured at the maximum posterior prominence of the gluteus using a retractable metal tape measure (Cescorf, Porto Alegre, Brazil). All measurements were taken twice, and if the difference between the first two measurements exceeded 1%, a third measurement was taken to ensure accuracy. The data were processed to obtain BMI measurements according to the Quetelet equation and the waist-to-hip ratio, based on the criteria from the World Health Organization.16

Postural assessment by Portland State University (PSU)

The Postural Correction Index (PCI) was established using the Portland State University instrument to assess posture globally and by regions, identifying postural deviations in the study participants. The intervention involved assessing variables related to body posture by using photographs of the participants taken from the sagittal and frontal planes, focusing on body regions such as the trunk, back, thighs, legs, and feet. These photographs were then compared with reference images from the PSU instrument, which requires subjective observation and comparison. The main objective was to detect asymmetries and possible postural deviations across body segments, enabling the evaluator to quantify the PCI through mathematical equations derived from the diagnostic results of the analyzed body regions. The scoring system was weighted as follows: 5 for no deviation, 3 for slight lateral deviation, and 1 for pronounced lateral deviation. The PCI is determined by adding the scores for each of the following regions: head and neck (HN) (five regions), thoracic and lumbar spine (TLS) (three regions), abdomen and hips (AH) (four regions), and lower limbs (LL) (four regions). After this evaluation, the total score is summed, divided by 75, and multiplied by 100 to calculate the percentage (see equation 1). The PCI procedures are well-documented in the scientific literature, and its methodology was replicated for repeatability in this study.14,15

(1)
PCI=Points(HN+TLS+AH+LL)75100

The assessments were conducted in a specially equipped room, featuring a retractable posture grid measuring 36 × 82 inches composed of printed blue lines on a white background made of flexible, long-lasting material. Subjects were positioned three meters away from a Sony Full-frame A7 camera (model ILCE-7M4K, Sony Corporation, Thailand), mounted on a COMAN tripod (model KX3939Q5S, China). Photographs were taken from the frontal and sagittal planes. To identify the type of plantar footprint, 210 mm thermal paper (FAX) was used. The participants’ feet were moistened with an alcohol-based antibacterial gel, and they stood for two minutes to obtain the plantar impressions (Figure 1).

a118f2cd-7726-4beb-b8a3-08bfb69de7df_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Determination of the type of plantar footprint.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using the Jamovi® statistical software, version 1.6. The data for the variables are presented as the means and their standard deviations. The normality of the data was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare, evaluate, and determine significance between values, the Student’s t-test for independent samples, and the Mann-Whitney U test were employed. The effect of one variable on another was identified through the Spearman correlation test. Correlation coefficients were determined according to the Hopkins scale (2002).17 To verify the reliability of the PSU instrument, the Cronbach’s alpha test was used. All analyses were conducted with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05 to accept or reject the hypotheses.

Results

The reliability of the Portland State University (PSU) instrument was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, yielding a value of 0.75, indicating a good internal consistency.18 Additionally, the body segment that showed the greatest relationship with the Postural Correction Index (PCI) from the PSU was the torso, with a high significant correlation of 0.75 according to Hopkins (2002).17

Table 1 shows the values of the variables according to gender, highlighting the differences between average values. Table 2 shows the impact of the physical activity variable on the determination of morbid risk. Table 3 details the components of the PSU instrument and their relationship with the variables identifying morbid risk.

Table 2. Correlation between physical activity and study variables.

HeightWeightBMIWaistPCI
Height (cm)1
Weight (kg)0.48**1
BMI (kg/m2)-0.260.66***1
Waist (cm)0.320.73***0.51**1
Hip (cm)-0.130.56***0.72***0.59***
Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)0.37*0.12-0.170.49**
Postural correction Index (PCI)-0.02-0.07-0.02-0.201
Physical activity (PA)-0.080.000.07-0.220.45**

* p < .05.

** p < .01.

*** p < .001.

Table 3. Correlation between sociodemographic variables and components of the postural correction index (PCI).

Components PCIAGEPABMIWaistWHR
Head-0.090.07-0.20-0.040.22
Shoulders0.34*0.02-0.080.070.21
Neck-0.32*0.43**0.03-0.40*-0.10
Thoracic depression-0.33*0.51**0.16-0.210.05
Anteroposterior shoulder alignment-0.230.51**0.21-0.060.01
Spine0.35*-0.04-0.200.010.32
Upper back-0.33*0.53***0.03-0.26-0.03
Trunk0.050.25-0.08-0.090.14
Hips0.100.13-0.080.080.23
Abdomen-0.150.41*-0.10-0.42**-0.11
Lower back0.24-0.35*-0.010.150.38*
Knock knees-0.180.17-0.050.000.09
Toe alignment-0.25-0.040.14-0.12-0.29
Type of plantar arch-0.070.11-0.010.120.07
Back of knees-0.130.23-0.13-0.30-0.27

* p < .05.

** p < .01.

*** p < .001.

The significant difference in height between genders showed a large effect size (E.S = 0.99). Similarly, the waist-to-hip ratio also presented a large effect size (E.S = 1.32), with all values evaluated according to Cohen (1988).19 The percentiles are categorized as follows:

FemaleMale
Poor (≤ 70.6)Poor (≤ 73.3)
Adequate (70.7 to 82.5)Adequate (73.4 to 84.5)
Excellent (≥ 82.6)Excellent (≥ 84.6)

Significant positive correlations were found between the study variables, classified as moderate (0.3 to 0.5), large (0.51 to 0.7), and very large (0.71 to 0.9). Notably, the impact of physical activity on the Postural Correction Index was considered to have a moderate effect.17

The variables that showed the most notable relationships with nearly all components of the Postural Correction Index were age and physical activity levels. Significant correlations, both positive and negative, were identified, with magnitudes ranging from moderate to large.

Discussion

In this study, we present the relationship between physical activity and variables of body posture and prediction of non-communicable chronic diseases. Among the main findings, moderate positive correlations were found between physical activity and the Postural Correction Index (PCI). The variables that showed the most correlations with the different components of the PSU were age and physical activity (PA).

Predictive variables for non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs)

Studies on the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) reveal significant differences between men and women in terms of health risks. Generally, men have a higher WHR and consequently, a greater propensity for health risks as compared to women. Our findings confirm this trend, showing that men have an average WHR that is 10% higher than that of women (see Table 1), with abnormal WHR values (men: 0.75 to 0.90; women: ≤0.80) exceeding those reported by Muaidi & Ahsan (2019).20

Regarding the Body Mass Index (BMI), the averages of our participants fall into the overweight range for both genders. However, longitudinal studies, such as one conducted in Korea with 75,586 people, have shown that the effect of a high BMI on mortality is lower in the elderly as compared to the overall adult population.21 Additionally, another study conducted in Brazil, based on the WHO classification, found that elderly individuals who were overweight showed a protective effect against mortality (risk ratio of 0.58), as compared to those with a normal BMI, even among the elderly with myopenia, although this difference was not statistically significant.22

BMI, waist circumference (WC), and WHR, are important anthropometric measurements associated with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and mortality risk.23 At the postural level, a higher BMI has been found to be linked to incorrect postures, both in standing position and during dynamic work.24 WHR, in turn, correlates with foot posture index scores.25 Overall, combining multiple anthropometric indices can provide a more comprehensive assessment of health risks related to NCDs and body posture in the elderly population.

Physical activity and body posture in the elderly

Physical activity offers significant benefits to older individuals, particularly in terms of posture and balance. Some studies have shown that older adults who engage in regular physical activity have a better seating posture, vertical alignment, and balance, as compared to their sedentary counterparts.6 Our findings revealed that physical activity levels were related to 40% of the components of the posture index, with a notable effect on the upper body (trunk), while excluding the lower back (lumbar). These results are positively associated with findings indicating vertebral growth in active older adults,26 who also exhibited improved postural control and sensory integration.27 Although some age-related postural changes persist, such as forward head posture and pelvic anteversion, physically active older adults may show less pronounced flexor postures due to strengthened extensor muscles. Exercise, particularly resistance and impact training, can improve bone strength and reduce the risk of falls in individuals with osteoporosis.28

This study has some limitations, including a relatively small sample size and the lack of a longitudinal follow-up to observe the effects of physical activity over time. Additionally, the assessment of posture focused on static parameters, without considering dynamic variations that may influence the results. Future research should involve larger samples and longitudinal designs to validate and expand these findings. It would also be beneficial to investigate the impact of different types of physical activity on posture and balance, as well as to incorporate dynamic measurements to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the interactions between physical activity and posture in older adults.

Conclusions

The authors conclude that physical activity has a significant positive impact on the posture of older adults, particularly in the trunk, contributing 40% to the improvement of the components of the postural correction index. The optimal values obtained, exceeding 84.67 in men and 82.67 in women according to the PSU assessment, highlight the effectiveness of physical activity in postural correction. Furthermore, physical activity appears to be particularly beneficial to the posture of the trunk, shoulders, and back, with specific improvements observed in thoracic depression, upper back, and anteroposterior shoulder alignment. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longitudinal approaches are recommended to more accurately predict the effect of physical activity on posture. Additionally, it is important to investigate how physical activity influences variables associated with non-communicable chronic diseases, to develop more effective strategies for their prevention and management.

Ethics and consent

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Santo Tomás de Valdivia (Chile) under Resolution No. 231366443/2023 SEREMI DE SALUD dated March 31, 2023, with number 188 MZS;1364.2024, as it was a non-invasive low-risk study in accordance with Resolution 8430/1993 by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia. Since participant images were used, anonymity was guaranteed, and consent was signed with this clarification.

Consent to publish

All participants in the study provided written informed consent, which explicitly informed them about the taking and processing of photographs. Additionally, the confidentiality of personal identities was assured throughout the study, implementing all necessary measures to guarantee the anonymity of the individuals involved.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Arango Zuleta SM, Poblete-Valderrama F and Monterrosa-Quintero A. Relationship between physical activity, body posture and morbidity risk in the elderly population [version 2; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2024, 13:1250 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155776.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.