Keywords
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, late-onset, sepsis, meningitis, Multi-drug resistance
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is an uncommon nosocomial pathogen that causes meningitis, pneumonia, and sepsis in neonates and in immunocompromised individuals. It exhibits resistance to many commonly employed first-line antibiotics used to treat gram-negative pathogens. Herein, we present three cases of late-onset sepsis with multi-drug resistant (MDR) Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in high-risk neonates.
Case 1 was a one-day-old preterm low-birth-weight infant who presented with respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock. The patient was intubated and administered empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungal agents. Blood culture grew Candida krusei, hence Amphotericin B was initiated. Repeat blood culture on day 27 showed gram-negative bacilli, identified as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica by MALDI-TOF . Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) revealed resistance to Piperacillin/Tazobactam, but sensitivity to Vancomycin, Levofloxacin, and Minocycline. IV Vancomycin was administered, which resulted in clinical improvement and negative blood culture results. Case 2 was an eleven-day-old preterm, low-birth-weight baby who presented with fever. Initial investigations revealed normal complete blood counts (CBC) parameters and elevated CRP levels. Blood and CSF cultures isolated Elizabethkingia meningoseptica with a similar AST pattern. Intravenous Ciprofloxacin was initiated with clinical improvement and negative follow-up blood cultures. Case 3 was a one-day-old preterm baby, appropriate-to-gestational age, presenting with respiratory distress syndrome. The infant was intubated and started on inotropic support and intravenous antibiotics. Blood cultures on day 4 showed Elizabethkingia meningoseptica and Vancomycin was started. Follow-up cultures on days 6 and 14 grew Acinetobacter baumannii. A combination of Levofloxacin and Colistin was added, and blood cultures were negative after seven days, with clinical improvement.
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is a significant cause of hospital-acquired infections, especially in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), leading to outbreaks. Clinicians must have a high degree of suspicion of E. meningoseptica for gram-negative bacilli causing sepsis and meningitis in high-risk patients. Recent technological advances have enabled accurate speciation to guide therapy and reduce morbidity and mortality rates.
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, late-onset, sepsis, meningitis, Multi-drug resistance
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is an uncommon cause of infection that mostly affects immunocompromised individuals.1 In neonates, premature birth weight and very low birth weight are major risk factors. E. meningoseptica infections present as early onset sepsis and meningitis with a high mortality rate. Reports of late-onset sepsis and meningitis are rare.2 E. meningoseptica is found in both natural and hospital environments, and is isolated from contaminated water supplies, equipment surfaces and tubing, infant formulas, and IV solutions.3,4 Its ability to form biofilms allows it to persist in hospital environments, with outbreaks being reported, especially in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU).5 Its intrinsic resistance and recent reports of multi-drug resistant strains (MDR) are a cause for growing concern.1 In the absence of established guidelines for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) and lack of evidence-based treatment regimens, treatment failures are common with negative patient outcomes.1
We present three cases of late-onset sepsis in high-risk neonates born at a district government hospital and admitted to the NICU simultaneously. All had a similar MDR AST profile but were successfully treated.
A 1-day-old preterm baby (32 weeks + 1 day) with low birth weight (1.42 kg), born via emergency LSCS, presented with respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock. The neonate was transferred to the NICU, intubated, started on inotropic support, and administered intravenous antibiotics (cefotaxime and gentamicin) and antifungals (fluconazole). On examination, the patient’s temperature was 36.5°C, pulse rate was 180/min, respiratory rate was 50/min, bilateral crepitations, and blood pressure was 40/24 mmHg. Results of cardiovascular and abdominal examinations were normal. On central nervous system examination, the child appeared dull.
The complete blood count (CBC) was within normal limits. Blood collected for culture in a pediatric BD BACTECTM (peds plus/F) bottle showed no growth. Serial counts showed a worsening trend, with increased CRP levels (23 mg/dL). On day 4, blood culture showed growth of Candida krusei with sensitivity to Voriconazole, Caspofungin and Amphotericin B. Voriconazole was initiated. Follow-up blood cultures sent on days 8 and 19 of admission showed persistence of Candida krusei. Hence, the treatment was changed to Amphotericin B.
A follow-up blood culture on day 27 of admission flagged as positive within 24 h. Gram staining showed gram-negative bacilli, and culture yielded aerobic, 1 to 2 mm smooth, circular, greyish white non-hemolytic colonies on blood agar, and non-lactose fermenting semitranslucent colonies on MacConkey agar. The isolate was identified as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (BiomerieuxTM) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) performed using VITEK 2 Compact (BiomerieuxTM). Vancomycin susceptibility was tested by using an E-strip. The isolate was sensitive to Vancomycin, Levofloxacin, Minocycline, and resistant to Piperacillin/Tazobactam. Antibiotics were changed IV Vancomycin 22 mg IV BD for 6 days. The child showed clinical signs of improvement and negative blood culture results.
An 11-day-old preterm (34 weeks + 2 days), low birth weight (1.86 kg) male baby delivered by normal vaginal delivery presented with fever. On admission, the child had a temperature of 100 °F. Neurosonogram results were normal. CBC, liver, and kidney function parameters were within normal limits; however, the CRP level was elevated (116 mg/dL). Blood cultures were collected in pediatric BACTEC bottles. The neonate was administered Piperacillin and Amikacin empirically.
The blood culture bottle flagged positive at 24 hours and showed short gram-negative bacilli. The organism was identified as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica with a sensitivity pattern identical to that of the first case. On day 8 of admission, as there was no clinical improvement and the CRP level was still elevated (131 mg/dL), lumbar puncture was performed. CSF cytology showed neutrophilic pleocytosis with increased protein (442 mg/dl) and decreased glucose (2 mg/dl) levels. CSF culture yielded E. meningoseptica with the same sensitivity pattern. The antibiotic was changed to intravenous Ciprofloxacin (20 mg TID). A follow-up blood culture on day 12 of admission showed no growth, and the markers of sepsis were negative. The patient showed clinical improvement.
A 1-day-old preterm baby (28 weeks + 2 day), appropriate for gestational age (970 g), born via emergency LSCS, presented with respiratory distress syndrome. The neonate was transferred to the NICU, intubated, and started on inotropic support and intravenous antibiotics (cefotaxime and amikacin).
On examination, the patient’s temperature was 36.5°C, pulse rate was 146/min, respiratory rate was 64/min, with bilateral crepitations. Results of cardiovascular and abdominal examinations were normal. On central nervous system examination, the child appeared dull. CBC was within the normal limits. Blood cultures showed no growth. Serial counts showed a worsening trend.
Blood culture collected on day 8 yielded Elizabethkingia meningoseptica within 36 h with the same AST pattern as the previous cases. Inj. Vancomycin (15 mg BD) was administered for 6 days. Follow-up blood cultures yielded pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Inj Meropenem 20 mg BD, and IV Colistin 1.5 lakh IU/day in two divided doses was administered for 14 days, after which blood culture showed no growth, and the child showed clinical signs of improvement.
Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is an emerging nosocomial pathogen widespread in natural environments. It can persist under harsh conditions in healthcare facilities and has been isolated from hospital water supplies and critical care equipment such as mechanical ventilators and indwelling catheters, resulting in outbreaks.3,4 In neonates, E. meningoseptica infection typically manifests as either early onset sepsis or meningitis. Predisposing factors in neonates include prematurity, very low birth weight, central venous catheters, immunosuppression, and prolonged and prior exposure to higher antibiotic concentrations.1,3 Neurological complications are common in 30.4% of survivors who develop hydrocephalus and 6.5% experience varying degrees of hearing loss.2,3
Recent reports show a notable increase in E. meningoseptica infections, possibly due to advanced automated methods.3 E. meningoseptica is resistant to a wide range of antimicrobials including β-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, polymyxins, chloramphenicol, and aminoglycosides. Uniquely, it is susceptible to antibiotics used to treat gram-positive infections such as Vancomycin, Clindamycin and Rifampicin. Thus, most empirical treatments for gram-negative infections are ineffective. The potential for multi-drug resistance and the absence of established guidelines for antibiotic susceptibility testing make management even more challenging. Based on the available data, a combination of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, linezolid, or rifampicin has demonstrated high cure rates in the treatment of E. meningoseptica meningitis and bacteremia.1,3
Attempts must be made to trace the source of the infection and to take stringent steps to prevent the transmission of this infection. Infection prevention recommendations include consistently using alcohol-based hand rubs following hand washing and using sterile water to change diapers. It is also important to periodically repair, clean, super chlorinate, and replace sink taps. Continuous training is essential to reinforce proper hand hygiene practices and contact precautions for hospital personnel.6
There are a few reports of E. meningoseptica causing late-onset sepsis and meningitis.1,2 Interestingly, all of our patients had late-onset sepsis and meningitis. Cases 1 and 3 presented with bacteremia, whereas case 2 showed meningitis. Prematurity was a common risk factor for all neonates. Additionally, cases 1 and 3 had other predisposing factors such as the use of central venous catheters and prolonged and prior exposure to higher antibiotic concentrations. Timely identification of cultures allows for prompt and tailored therapy with good patient outcomes. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the potential neurological complications. Neonates were admitted to the NICU during the same period. We hypothesized that our cases were nosocomial infections; however, environmental screening failed to identify the source of infection.
The presence of gram-negative bacilli causing bacteremia or meningitis in neonates with risk factors must alert clinicians to E. meningoseptica. Prompt and appropriate antibiotic therapy is key to curbing long-term morbidity and mortality.
This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore), Reg No. ECR/541/Inst/KA/2014/RR-20, DHR Reg. No. EC/NEW/INST/2020/742. Approval was given on 20.12.2023 with protocol number IEC KMC MLR-12/2023/513.
Written informed consent for publication of clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the parents of the patients.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Partly
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Partly
Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?
Partly
References
1. Burnard D, Gore L, Henderson A, Ranasinghe A, et al.: Comparative Genomics and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Elizabethkingia Isolates Reveal Nosocomial Transmission and In Vitro Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones, Tetracyclines, and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58 (9). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Published a case series of Elizabethkingia BSI in adults.
Is the background of the cases’ history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the conclusion balanced and justified on the basis of the findings?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Antimicrobial resistance , Antimicrobial Stewardship, Clinical Informatics
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 2 (revision) 06 Feb 25 |
read | |
Version 1 15 Nov 24 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)