Keywords
Monkeypox, Virus, Control strategies, Guidelines
This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.
This article is included in the Trends and Advances in Counteracting Mpox: A Global Public Health Emergency collection.
Research on Mpox is essential to protect public health, develop effective interventions, and enhance global preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks. Owing to the scarcity of any specific treatment for Mpox disease, public health guidelines are important for patient care and management. Therefore, this systematic review suggests a public health policy guidelines to control Mpox diseases, especially in densely populated countries.
In this systematic review study, the databases and search engines PubMed, Scopus, BanglaJol, WHO, and Google Scholar were searched, and related literature was retrieved for further investigation. Articles describing monkeypox epidemiology, clinical symptoms, and preventive strategies, and published in English language were the core inclusion criteria; articles published in other languages were excluded. All records in the literature were managed through Mendeley (version 1.19.4) reference manager and summarized for further investigation.
Mpox severity is prevalent in America and Europe. Male (96.3%) and young adults aged 18-44 years (mean: 34 years) were the most vulnerable population due to the virus. Among the patients, rash and fever were the most frequent symptoms, with cough, vomiting, anogenital pain and/or bleeding, conjunctivitis, diarrhea, and genital edema being the least prevalent symptoms in less than 5% of the patients. As there is no specific treatment for the disease, infection control in densely populated countries require early detection, isolation of infected individuals, strict infection control measures, mass vaccination campaigns, education, public awareness campaigns, and continued investment in research.
This study underscores the urgent need for comprehensive infection control strategies, including early detection, strict isolation protocols, mass vaccination initiatives, and ongoing research investment given the absence of specific treatment options for the disease.
Monkeypox, Virus, Control strategies, Guidelines
Throughout history, the world has been shaken by various pandemics and epidemics, such as plague, cholera, influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), Dengue, and COVID-19, which have affected humanity and resulted in millions of deaths.1–7 Rare diseases, also known as orphan diseases, affect a relatively small number of individuals in a population.8 However, these conditions often pose significant challenges in terms of diagnosis, treatment, management, and research, owing to their limited prevalence and scarcity of available information.9 While each rare disease may affect only a few people, it collectively affects a substantial portion of the global population.8,9
Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) is a rare viral disease closely related to the human smallpox virus.10 The disease was first identified in 1958 in monkeys kept for research purposes in Denmark, and subsequently found to be present in a range of animals, including rodents, squirrels, and other small mammals, and in humans in central and western African countries.11 Mpox has also been reported in other parts of the world including Asia.12 The virus that causes Mpox is a member of the Orthopoxvirus genus, which also includes the variola virus that causes smallpox.13 Mpox is a zoonotic disease, meaning it is transmitted from animals to humans. The primary route of transmission is contact with infected animals or humans.14,15 The virus can spread through contact with body fluids or contaminated objects such as bedding or clothing.16 On September 27, 2022, over 66,000 cases were confirmed in more than 100 non-endemic countries, with fluctuating epidemiological foot printing from retrospective epidemics.11
This narrative review study was undertaken to address the urgent need for comprehensive patient care and management guidelines as well as to provide crucial insights for informing policy and practices regarding the Mpox disease outbreak. The primary objective of this study was to assess the epidemiology, clinical symptoms, and severity of Mpox and develop a meticulously crafted guideline that would effectively address the various aspects of patient care and management in the context of Mpox. Given the significant public health implications of Mpox in densely populated countries, this study holds immense importance for informing and shaping future policies, guidelines, and practices to effectively mitigate the impact of this infectious disease.
As a new viral disease, research on Mpox is limited, and its scarcity is highly visible in developing countries, including Bangladesh. Due to the unavailability of specific treatments for the disease, preventive guidelines are necessary to control the disease. Considering this, the current study aimed to assess the epidemiology, symptoms, and severity of the disease by reviewing the current literature and suggesting a preventive guideline for controlling Mpox disease in densely populated countries.
A systematic literature search was performed on the current epidemiology, symptoms, severity, and possible preventive guidelines for controlling Mpox disease. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA PRISMA-P) 2020.17
Initially, various databases and search engines including PubMed, BanglaJol, WHO and Google Scholar were searched, and related literatures were retrieved by incorporating keywords such as “Mpox,” “Monkeypox,” “Monkeypox Outbreak,” “Control of Monkeypox,” “Prevention of monkeypox,” “Epidemiology of Monkeypox,” “Symptoms of Monkeypox,” “Densely Populated Countries,” and “Preventive Guidelines for Monkeypox.” A snowball technique was then applied to search for relevant articles for further investigation. We also searched the websites of national and international health organizations to retrieve recent statistics.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) articles and webpage describing the current epidemiology, clinical symptoms, and preventive strategies, and (ii) articles published in English. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) studies describing other parameters that were not of interest and (ii) studies published in other languages.
All records in the literature were managed using the Mendeley (version 1.19.4) reference manager, and duplications were eliminated. The epidemiology of MPOX has been reported in graphs. The severity of MPOX disease has been reported using a bar diagram. Six preventive guidelines for controlling Mpox were incorporated into the reviewed literature.
Systematic research was conducted in which a total of 55 and four webpage reports articles were identified via an initial search removing duplicates. Of these, 10 studies including eight articles with two websites of WHO met the eligibility criteria and were included for further assessment. The details search strategies are presented in supplementary Figure S1.18
The global numbers of confirmed cases and deaths due to Mpox disease are presented in Figure 1. Most cases were reported in different regions of America and Europe (Figure 1a). In Asia, the number of MPOX cases was comparatively lower. The number of deaths due to the disease was also the highest in the American region (Figure 1b). The second highest level was in Africa. South Asia was the least affected region by Mpox. Most of the affected patients were male (96.3%) and 3.65% were female. Males between 18-44 years old were disproportionately affected by this outbreak and accounted for 79.0% of cases, with a median age of 34 years.10 Households were the most common exposure setting (45%), and the most common form of transmission was sexual encounters (51%).19
(a) Cases from January 1, 2022 to July 2024, 2023; (b) Deaths due from March 1, 2022 to June 1, 2023. This figure has been reproduced based on the dataset retrieved from the website of the World Health Organization.19
Rash and fever were the most frequent symptoms of Mpox diseases (Figure 2). More than 90% of MPOX-affected patients suffered from any rash. Systemic and Genital rashes were the most common symptoms in the affected patients. The second most frequent symptom was fever, affecting more than 50% of the patients suffered by fever. Literature suggests that the symptoms of Mpox are similar to those of smallpox, but the disease is generally milder. The mean incubation period for the virus is usually 9.1 (95% CI 6.5–10.9) days, with 5th and 95th percentiles of the distribution being 2–20 days.20 Initial symptoms include fever, headache, muscle aches, and fatigue.10 A rash then develops, starting on the face and spreading to other parts of the body. The rash usually progresses to the blister stage before crusting and healing over several weeks.10 Mpox is generally a self-limiting disease; however, severe cases can occur, particularly in people with weakened immune systems. The disease can be fatal in some cases, with mortality rates ranging from 1% to 10%, depending on the outbreak and the population affected.21
This figure has been reproduced based on the dataset retrieved from the website of the World Health Organization.19
MPOX is a viral disease that poses a significant threat to public health, particularly in highly populated countries. The virus is primarily transmitted from animals to humans and can spread rapidly in areas with dense populations. There is no specific treatment for MPOX, but the disease can be managed through supportive care, including the use of antiviral medications, antibiotics to prevent secondary infections, and pain relief. In some cases, vaccination with the smallpox vaccine may provide protection against Mpox.22 As there is no specific treatment for MPOX, effective control strategies are essential to prevent outbreaks and minimize the impact of the disease.
Strategy 1: The first step in controlling MPOX is the identification and isolation of infected individuals.23 Rapid detection and reporting of cases are critical for preventing the spread of the virus. Public health agencies should establish effective surveillance systems to monitor outbreaks and ensure that all suspected cases are investigated promptly. Early diagnosis and treatment can help reduce the severity of the disease and limit its spread.22
Strategy 2: Another key control strategy is the implementation of strict infection control measures in healthcare settings.24 Healthcare workers should take precautions to avoid contact with infected individuals and wear appropriate protective equipment such as gloves and masks. Patients with suspected Mpox should be isolated to prevent the spread of the virus to others.
Strategy 3: Vaccination is another important control strategy for MPOX. The smallpox vaccine, which provides protection against Mpox, has been successfully used in some outbreaks. In highly populated countries, mass vaccination campaigns are necessary to prevent outbreaks.22 The effectiveness of the vaccine may vary depending on the population being vaccinated and the specific strain of virus involved.
Strategy 4: Healthcare professionals play a vital role in controlling the spread of MPOX in highly populated countries.25 They take steps to improve the infection control measures in healthcare settings. Healthcare workers should wear appropriate protective equipment, such as gloves and masks, and implement effective disinfection procedures to prevent the spread of the virus. Patients with suspected Mpox should be isolated to prevent the spread of the virus to others.26
Strategy 5: Education and public awareness campaigns are also critical for controlling the spread of Mpox.22 Public health agencies should educate the public about the disease, its mode of transmission, and the importance of promptly seeking medical attention if they suspect that they may have been exposed to the virus. Individuals should be encouraged to practice good hygiene, such as regular hand washing, to prevent the spread of the virus.22
Strategy 6: Finally, it is essential to invest in research to better understand the virus and to develop more effective prevention and treatment strategies. These include studying the transmission of the virus from animals to humans, developing improved diagnostic tests, and developing new therapies and vaccines.27,28
This systematic review assessed the epidemiology and severity of Mpox disease, and suggested six control strategies as a guidelines for patient care in densely populated countries. The findings require a multifaceted approach that includes early detection and isolation of infected patients, harsh infection control measures in healthcare settings, mass vaccination campaigns, public education and awareness campaigns, and continued investment in research to control and manage the disease in densely populated countries.
Ethical approval and participant consent were not applicable due to the nature of the study.
MMR conceived the idea of the study, conducted systematic searches, screened, and finalized the articles included in the review study, analyzed, drafted, edited the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript for submission.
Mohammad Meshbahur Rahman serves as an Assistant Professor of the Department of Biostatistics of the National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212 under the Directorate General of Health Services of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of Bangladesh. His research focuses broadly on public health, healthcare policy, epidemiology, and biostatistics. In addition, Mr. Rahman involves to the global and regional public health policy research.
No data are associated with this article.
Figshare: PRISMA Checklist and Flow chart for Systematic Review of the Epidemiology, disease severity and preventive measures of Mpox disease: A public health guideline for densely-populated countries, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25919971. 18
This study contains the following extended data:
• Supplementary Figure S1. (PRISMA Flow chart)
• Supplementary Table S2. PRISMA_2020_checklist (PRISMA Checklist)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The author is grateful to Mr. Sadhan Kumar Das, Senior Staff Nurse, Directorate General of Nursing, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh, for his support with the manuscript.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?
Partly
If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Varicella, Herpes Zoster, Herpes Simplex, Monkeypox.
Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?
Partly
If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)
Not applicable
References
1. Lahariya C, Thakur A, Dudeja N: Monkeypox Disease Outbreak (2022): Epidemiology, Challenges, and the Way Forward.Indian Pediatr. 2022; 59 (8): 636-642 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Public health, Infectious diseases, non communicable diseases, Epidemiology, Primary healthcare, Global health.
Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Not applicable
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?
Partly
If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: monkeypox virus, mpox, outbreak response, emerging infectious diseases, zoonosis, One Health, filoviruses
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 1 07 Jun 24 |
read | read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)