Keywords
Health Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Health, Health Management, Innovation
This article is included in the Health Services gateway.
Health systems are experiencing increasing pressures worldwide due to heightened service demands, demographic aging, stringent regulations, and economic constraints, making efficiency and efficacy in health management critical aspects. At the heart of this complexity, health managers seek to optimize resources and improve care delivery at a time when the adoption of digital technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), becomes increasingly imperative. This necessity reflects not only the pursuit of innovation but also the urgency to adapt to an ever-evolving environment. However, the effective characterization, availability, and incorporation of these technologies as support tools still represent an emerging challenge that is insufficiently explored in the literature. In response, this project proposes the development of a framework of theoretical and practical guidelines for the implementation and management of digital tools in health systems in the age of AI. Adopting a mixed-methods approach that includes systematic review, analyses of commercial off-the-shelf solutions, and qualitative studies with health managers and practitioners, the aim is to map current technology use, identify gaps and best practices, and provide a guide for future direction. This project also intends to develop in co-creation with professionals in the field to ensure the relevance and practical applicability of the developed guidelines. The results are expected to not only contribute to the scientific literature but also offer an evidence-based guide to optimizing the use of digital technologies in health management, promoting a significant transformation in the development and adoption of innovative digital solutions.
Health Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Health, Health Management, Innovation
Facing a rising patient volume driven by population growth and demographic aging, diverse health needs, stringent regulations, and economic restrictions, health systems are under considerable pressure.1–3 The escalating demand across global health systems is a prominent concern, with projections indicating an even more challenging and potentially unsustainable future. For instance, in low- and middle-income countries, an additional annual expenditure of 274 to 371 billion dollars is estimated to be necessary by 2030.4 This increase in expenses would significantly raise the average healthcare spending per person. However, alarmingly, a funding shortfall of 20 to 54 billion dollars per year is still anticipated.4
In this context, health managers are responsible for orchestrating the continuous operation of these complex systems across various levels, ensuring optimal patient care while simultaneously balancing financial, regulatory, and human resource challenges. Their role demands strategic vision, adaptability, and a deep understanding of both clinical and administrative domains, making them essential stakeholders in the constantly evolving healthcare landscape.5 For example, middle managers in healthcare organizations play a critical role in implementing healthcare innovations by disseminating and synthesizing information, as well as bridging the gap between strategy and the execution of daily activities.6 A study conducted to determine the key roles, functions, and responsibilities of health managers and administrators across various units and departments revealed that, regardless of the setting, these professionals dedicate significant time and effort to problem-solving and decision-making, collaborating with other disciplines, developing people, and cost containment.7
Since then, this scenario has followed the trend of digital transformation, which is now redefining how healthcare sectors can operate.8,9 In the last decade, the healthcare industry has seen a surge in the development of specialized software systems and tools tailored to its specific needs. Systems and technologies designed for health management have become widespread.10 These technologies cover a broad range of functions, from complex patient management and strategic resource allocation to data-driven analytics and telehealth.11,12 Nowadays, health managers are equipped with a diverse array of sophisticated software systems and technological tools.13 Commercial solutions and bespoke applications have transformed the ways in which healthcare systems confront their challenges. Among these digital advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a particularly significant subset.14,15 Techniques such as machine learning, predictive analytics, and natural language processing hold the potential to improve decision-making processes, enhance operational efficiency, and more accurately predict trends within healthcare systems.16,17
Interestingly, despite a wealth of perspectives on digital tools for clinical professionals and patient-directed applications, the literature focused on their use by health managers remains underrepresented.13,14,18,19 These professionals, endowed with significant decision-making responsibilities, influence structures that profoundly impact healthcare delivery and public health policies.20,21 The narratives surrounding the strategic utility, implications, and challenges of these technologies from the perspective of healthcare system managers are still fragmented or primarily focused on clinical applications.22 Moreover, it is crucial to discern the gap between the potential benefits and the benefits realized in practice.18,23 While many institutions have successfully leveraged AI and digital solutions, others face integration challenges ranging from technical obstacles to stakeholder resistance.24
Given the transformative potential and inherent complexities of developing and adopting digital tools, it becomes imperative to gain insights to map the current landscape and devise future strategies. Health management, with its extensive implications, requires decisions based on evidence.25 To this end, this project aims to delve into the current state of the field by providing a synthesized, taxonomized, and critical view of the existing evidence and, from there, to create solutions that can accelerate informed decision-making, support the dissemination of knowledge, and shape future research and technology development trajectories.
To formulate a framework of theoretical and practical guidelines for the development and implementation of digital tools, including artificial intelligence, in the decision-making and management processes of healthcare systems.
1. To systematically review literature regarding the utilization of technological tools, including artificial intelligence, in health systems management.
2. To assess the current technological tools available on the market, identifying their practical implications within healthcare settings.
3. To explore health managers’ experiences and expectations concerning technology use, utilizing qualitative methods such as interviews and field studies.
4. To construct a framework comprising guidelines and developmental protocols, synthesizing insights from academic, commercial, and practitioners’ perspectives.
5. To evaluate and enhance the framework’s practical effectiveness and acceptance through targeted professional feedback.
This project stems from the core of a larger umbrella project: the CIARS Network - Artificial Intelligence Applied to Health, which was included in the Innovative Networks of Strategic Technologies (RITEs) program, sponsored by the State of Rio Grande do Sul Research Support Foundation (FAPERGS).26
When applicable in the phase that will involve human participants, the study part will be submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Passo Fundo - RS through the Plataforma Brazil, in compliance with Resolution 466/2012 of the National Health Council regarding the participation of individuals in research.
Due to the involvement of mixed methods, each phase will have its own in-depth design, which will be elaborated upon at the time of execution. This protocol includes a general outline of the work scope and execution strategy. Figure 1 provides a detailed overview of the project’s methodology and action strategies across its phases.
This initial phase involves a comprehensive survey of the state of the art in tools and technological solutions applied to healthcare system management. The methodology will include three distinct primary sources to ensure a broad and comprehensive strategy in mapping the current landscape.
Phase 1.1 – Literature and theories
In this stage, a scoping systematic review of the literature27 will be conducted to identify research from multiple databases that span the disciplines of health administration—specifically Medline and Embase—and technology and computer science—IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library. Data extraction will focus on essential elements, such as metadata of the articles (for example, publication date, country of origin), technological characteristics (for example, type of software, tools, or methods), and application context (for example, application domain and key factors considered). Variables related to the use of technologies, real-world implications, and formal assessments of effectiveness, usability, or limitations will also be analyzed. Studies will be categorized based on their primary focus and the purpose of the features—whether they are software systems, models, or other decision-support tools—and will be summarized in terms of interest factors, providing a detailed overview to inform the subsequent development of the framework.
Phase 1.2 – Commercial solutions
The analysis of commercial solutions will begin by examining technical documentation from off-the-shelf solutions. We will consider searches on commercial repositories, such as Google Play and Apple App Stores. Additionally, this stage may include interacting with the industry, if necessary, including requests for demonstrations of nationally recognized systems used in healthcare institutions. We will identify the list of main systems through registrations or certifications awarded by recognized organizations, such as the Brazilian Society of Health Informatics,28 which can be complemented with other exploratory research. Following this, the analysis may be enhanced by the use of market intelligence data and industry reports from recognized sources such as Veeva Industry Reports29 and IQVIA Reports and Publications.30 This approach will provide a practical understanding of the products in use and their functionalities, followed by an in-depth view of market trends, system performance, and predictive analyses relevant to healthcare management. The integration of this information will result in a comprehensive comparative report that highlights the strengths, limitations, and opportunities for improvement of the off-the-shelf technological solutions available in the market.
Phase 1.3 – Experience from practitioners
The phase focused on understanding the experiences of health managers will involve a series of qualitative interviews aimed at deepening the understanding of their needs, challenges, and expectations regarding the current and future use of technologies in decision-making and management processes. These interviews will be structured to elicit detailed information about daily interactions with digital tools and perceptions of how these technologies can be optimized to support health management. Additionally, and where appropriate, field observations may be conducted to enrich the collected data. The managers to be interviewed will primarily be selected based on their association with the CIARS project,26 ensuring that the views gathered are aligned with the institutions directly involved in the project’s scope. Alternatively, a sample may be considered that includes managers from institutions with significant representativeness for the health management context or specific regionalities, such as certain regions of Brazil or the state of Rio Grande do Sul, to ensure a variety of perspectives within the national context. The techniques for data collection and analysis will follow a qualitative and observational approach and will be defined during the consolidation of the phase.
With the information collected, the construction of the guiding framework will commence, integrating theoretical and practical guidelines for the effective use of technological tools in health management. The phases for its execution are detailed below.
Phase 2.1 – Compilations and proposal
This phase begins with the compilation of information gathered in the previous phase, synthesized to identify convergences and divergences in the data through triangulation techniques,31 o develop the initial version of the framework. Additionally, a co-creation approach32,33 with health managers is intended. This phase will adopt an iterative and collaborative approach, utilizing the Delphi method34 to gather insights and forecasts from a panel of experts in health technology and health system management. This method will help achieve consensus on the proposed specifications, allowing expert opinions to be refined over several rounds of questionnaires. Depending on the need and context, mixed methods may be incorporated to enrich the co-creation process, such as workshops or roundtable discussions. The goal of this phase is to arrive at a set of detailed and actionable guidelines, reflecting a synthesis of best practices, research evidence, and applicability in the health management context.
Phase 2.2 – Testing and validation
The final stage of the project will focus on the practical validation of the framework through the conduct of case studies in real-world health institution contexts. These studies will be complemented by rounds of feedback with health managers to ensure that the perspectives and experiences of end-users are fully considered. Specific evaluation techniques, such as usability analysis, acceptance testing, and pilot testing or simulations, will be employed to assess the effectiveness and practical applicability of the framework. These evaluations will provide valuable insights that may lead to adjustments in the guidelines as needed, culminating in the finalization of the framework to be published and disseminated in the literature.
This project aims to advance the application and management of digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, within healthcare systems. By combining systematic reviews, analysis of commercial solutions, and in-depth interaction with health managers, it strategically addresses gaps in knowledge and practice. The methodology, particularly the inclusion of data triangulation and co-creation processes with professionals, ensures a multidimensional and innovative approach. This strategy not only guarantees the relevance and applicability of the developed guidelines but also sets a new standard for the integration of emerging technologies in health management, promoting tangible improvements in decision-making and operational processes.
The innovation of the project lies not only in its methodological approach but also in its ability to bring together diverse perspectives and expertise, spanning academia, the technology industry, and the healthcare sector. This enables the creation of a guidelines framework that is robust, inclusive, and adaptable to various healthcare contexts. The expectation is that this framework will serve as a reliable guide for health managers and technology developers, guiding the effective implementation of digital solutions that directly meet the needs of healthcare systems.
Furthermore, the execution of this project has the potential to result in high-impact academic publications, making a significant contribution to the scientific literature in the fields of health management and technology. These publications, already planned in the methodological design, will disseminate essential knowledge to the academic and practical community, stimulating future research and practical applications. The anticipation of articles derived from each phase of the project reinforces the expected academic and practical contribution, marking its presence in scientific discussions and relevant conferences in the field.
The expected impact of the project extends beyond academic boundaries, influencing health policies, management practices, and technology development. By addressing a critical gap in an innovative manner and producing a set of validated, evidence-based guidelines, the project promotes a real transformation in how digital technologies are conceived, implemented, and managed in healthcare systems. Thus, the project not only contributes to scientific and practical advancement at the intersection of technology and health management but also offers a viable pathway for the continuous improvement of the quality, efficiency, and sustainability of healthcare services.
When appropriate in the segment involving human subjects, the component of the study will be presented to the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Passo Fundo - RS via Plataforma Brazil, in adherence to Resolution 466/2012 of the National Health Council concerning individual participation in research. The submission will include an analysis request by the ethics committee for the participation of individuals in qualitative interviews along with a solicitation for written consent concerning the use of images and assurances of confidentiality. Given that this study does not constitute a health intervention, it is anticipated that the ethics committee will exempt it from the requirement for approval.
Participants will be required to provide written consent to partake in the study, which entails engaging in interviews and qualitative activities. This consent will cover the direct use of images and ensure confidentiality concerning the information disclosed.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?
No
Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?
Not applicable
References
1. Lau P, Ryan S, Abbott P, Tannous K, et al.: Protocol for a Delphi consensus study to select indicators of high-quality general practice to achieve Quality Equity and Systems Transformation in Primary Health Care (QUEST-PHC) in Australia. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17 (5). Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Machine Learning for Health, Meta-research, AI for global health, Trustworthy AI
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 04 Jul 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)