Keywords
Supporting factors, home care services, patient satisfaction
This article is included in the Health Services gateway.
Home care services are an extension of hospital services provided by hospital staff. The hospital must conduct evaluation, coordination, and education for home care patients to ensure proper care and expedite their recovery. This service also introduces a new concept to the community, as it can help save on costs and equipment. The purpose of this study has been added to the background, namely to determine what factors can influence patient satisfaction with home care services from previously published literature. A systematic review examined the factors influencing patient satisfaction using home care services by following the PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO submitted and approved the study protocol with the following numbers: CRD42023482315. Researchers have searched articles through the ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The researcher chose the three databases that are open access providers. Including Scopus and ScienceDirect are article search databases that can be accessed directly in the electronic resources of the University of Indonesia Library. The 10-year time span is considered as a source of literature that is still relevant to be used as a reference in evaluating home care service satisfaction.
Two hundred eighty-eight articles were selected, but 10 met the inclusion criteria. It was found that factors influenced patient satisfaction with home care services and two things that did not affect them: financial aspects and working time.
Fifteen aspects influence patient satisfaction and two aspects that do not influence patient satisfaction. It is expected that the results of this literature review can be used as a reference for hospitals that provide home care services to pay attention to aspects that can affect satisfaction. The author realizes that the varying methods in the articles reviewed are deficiencies in the results of this study.
Supporting factors, home care services, patient satisfaction
Some differences from the first version are:
Literature search database has been included in the method section. The purpose of the study has been added to the background, which is to determine what factors can affect patient satisfaction with home care services from previously published literature. The paragraphs in the Introduction have been arranged according to the research objectives starting from paragraph one describing the issue of the professional nurse paradigm. Paragraph two describing the need for post-hospitalization care in hospitals. Paragraph three several obstacles to home care services. Paragraph four the importance of innovation in home care services that can increase patient satisfaction. The objectives of this literature review have been added. The researcher chose the three databases that are open access providers. Including Scopus and ScienceDirect are article search databases that can be accessed directly in the electronic resources of the University of Indonesia Library. The 10-year time span is considered as a source of literature that is still relevant to be used as a reference in evaluating home care service satisfaction. Critical assessment was conducted in four research articles using a qualitative study checklist, five studies use a quantitative research checklist, and one uses a mixed method study. Data shows high heterogeneity in terms of research methods. Researchers conduct quality assessment with one research member, and if there is an disagreement on the results of a review, the researcher asks the results of a review from other research members. The author admits that in conducting the analysis of the 10 literatures, there are limitations, namely three different research designs obtained. However, the variables that influence home care patient satisfaction from the 10 literatures can be used as an evaluation for the development of home care services that prioritize patient satisfaction aspects.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Cheng Yin
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Kallol Kumar Bhattacharyya
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jane EA Lewis
The nursing profession has undergone a paradigm shift, namely from vocational to professional. Nurses were previously seen as extensions or assistants of one of the health professions, but are now equal partners with other health professions. Nurses provide nursing care to individual patients, families, and communities to improve health, well-being, and maintain and recover from an illness.1
Nurses explore information related to patient expectations in their treatment and life, through ongoing care, and maintaining good relationships with the patient’s family. Nurses fill in data in an effort to complete accurate and precise information about the patient’s condition.2 Patients who are hospitalized already have a follow-up care plan at home. Nurses are responsible for educating patients and their families so that patients can be independent so that they can reduce costs and time of hospitalization.3,4 Home care services are services at home when someone is not feeling well and wants to be at home with the aim of keeping family members together and adapting to individual needs.5
In general, home care services are a continuation of hospital services and are carried out by hospital staff, but in the evaluation, education and coordination between patients and home care staff are needed to accelerate their recovery. This is also a new orientation for the community because it can save costs and equipment.6–8 The provision of health services through home care does not reflect fair, safe, and cultural aspects. There are still obstacles such as communication, prejudice, ethnocentrism, education, lack of support from health services.9
One home care model that uses an innovative approach offers the potential to improve quality and address the challenges of home care. These challenges are resources, time and task rules, health and social care. This form of innovation shows a shift from transactional to care that builds trust and relationships between service users, moving towards a proactive and preventative care model. Involving individual care teams and technology as part of the way of working, not just a care solution.10 Quality home care services in terms of reliability, assurance, direct evidence, empathy, and responsiveness are related to patient family satisfaction.11 Health is synonymous with well-being, happiness, and life satisfaction which is the level of physical, emotional, intellectual, social, moral, and spiritual strength. Human health is a state of satisfaction or happiness and well-being that reflects the level of fulfillment of physical, psychological, spiritual, social, aesthetic, and material needs and desires that are felt.12 The purpose of this study has been added to the background, namely to determine what factors can influence patient satisfaction with home care services from previously published literature.
A systematic review was conducted to examine the factors influencing patient satisfaction using home care services by following the PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria included human subjects of all ages, genders, and with or without disease, interventions with actions that can increase satisfaction, results of qualitative and quantitative research that state the influence on happiness, and literature review of home care patient satisfaction.
Report characteristics are all studies written in English and published from 2012 to 2022. Researchers searched articles through the ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Researchers have checked out article references from database searches to find additional relevant articles. We used Boolean operators to search for the following terms: (Home Care Services) AND Satisfaction and derivatives of these terms, full-text article type, English—subject nursing and health professions, with open access. The researcher chose the three databases that are open access providers. Including Scopus and ScienceDirect are article search databases that can be accessed directly in the electronic resources of the University of Indonesia Library. The 10-year time span is considered as a source of literature that is still relevant to be used as a reference in evaluating home care service satisfaction.
In the data extraction process, irrelevant articles such as articles on patient satisfaction in nursing homes and out-of-home care were removed resulting in 228 relevant articles based on the title and abstract in English. The articles were filtered and 31 articles were removed due to duplication in the Google Scholar database search leaving 197 relevant articles based on the title and abstract. Furthermore, variables that met the inclusion criteria were selected, namely variables that affect patient satisfaction with home care leaving 73 articles. Furthermore, the selection was carried out by re-reading the suitability of the variables leaving ten complete articles that met the inclusion criteria.
Critical appraisal was conducted to identify the quality of the included studies. The author conducted the process. Four research articles used a qualitative study checklist, five studies used a quantitative research checklist, and one used a mixed methods study. The data showed high heterogeneity in terms of research methods. The researcher conducted a quality assessment with one research member, and if there was disagreement on the review results, the researcher asked the other research members for the review results. The results are presented in a table showing a summary of the variables that affect satisfaction.
The nine steps of synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews guide the analysis of data in articles using quantitative methods to complement and extend PRISMA. In the first step, studies should be synthesized, grouping populations, interventions, outcomes, and study designs. Next, in steps 2–7, answer the review question. Similarities and differences that are primarily related to assessment methods, assessment tools, assessors involved, and competencies acquired are identified. In steps 8–10, results are formulated based on keywords for categorization. Results are synthesized and the certainty of findings is made in consistent language. Results are then presented in tables, indicating study groups and objectives, presenting and discussing results, and identifying limitations.
After selecting and using the Prisma chart ( Figure 1), ten articles were obtained that were the aim of this research, namely identifying factors that influence satisfaction with home care services. The first journal’s influencing factor is respecting patients and maintaining their dignity.13 Furthermore, the second journal states that nurses must understand the patient’s illness and establish a relationship of mutual trust.14 The third journal shows the opposite: economic factors and working hours do not affect home care patient satisfaction.15 Furthermore, the four can coordinate in a comprehensive, continuous assessment of service and collaborate with multidisciplinary science.16 Fifth, sixth, and seven, well-prepared routines, language and communication, and empathy.17–19 Eighth, nine, and ten, namely quality nursing services, a combination of competence and professional skills in wound management, continuity of care, and training and experience of nurses.20–22
Nurses can start home care services with a humble attitude and have an attitude of respecting their clients and listening to them. This attitude is very important because it is related to making decisions for clients to suit their needs.23 The attitude and responsibility of nurses show that nursing actions are not just technical actions, but require a process of change and dynamic organization.24 Nurses maintain a person’s dignity, which is one of the fundamental actions and rights of every human being since birth to have the same dignity. Respectful attitudes to anyone must be carried out by nurses because it is the core concept that is guaranteed for every human being.25
A nurse when caring for a home care patient must be flexible, be able to trust each other and be able to approach the patient. Meeting after meeting will describe the positive aspects that are assessed by the client. Nurses must be able to explain the importance of mutual trust, and the need to create a sense of trust.26 Nurses must be able to understand their clients’ conditions, because they will seek a deep understanding of their illness, the causes of their illness, and prevention of complications.27
Nurses contribute to coordinating with the health team, to support the interventions provided. Good coordination also has an impact on meeting the complex needs of clients.28 Collaboration with other nurses needs to be improved, and made systematic by nurse managers, because it can improve patient safety culture.29 Nurses strive for continuous professional development and undertake lifelong learning to improve standards of care. Nurses are also motivated to improve their knowledge, skills and follow the latest scientific developments.30
Nurses can provide empathy, namely being able to understand the client’s personal experience without being tied down, and being able to communicate well including emotional, cognitive and behavioral aspects. A health professional can provide empathy well which can influence therapeutic changes in their clients. Clients will feel safe to convey their problems in order to be able to provide services according to their needs.31 Understanding empathy towards patients can improve nursing communication skills.32
Home care nurses can provide continuous professional nursing services by involving their families. Nurses need home care guidelines as a reference to provide the best quality of care to patients.33 Professional skills are also needed such as wound care. Registered nurses are required to have diverse competencies and perform good quality evidence-based actions. Consistent and structured areas of competency such as wound care can be improved and developed to produce services according to client expectations.34 Optimal home care depends on collaborative action and dialogue between the client, family, home care nurse, and general practitioner. A good starting point is when the interdisciplinary collaboration meeting is held for good results in home care services.35
Respect and maintaining dignity are supporting factors that influence patient satisfaction found in nurses or home care teams. Meanwhile, what can be learned and trained is understanding the client’s illness, establishing a relationship of trust, assessing services, collaboration, language, communication, empathy, and quality of service. Aspects that must be possessed include experience and training. The author realizes that the varying methods in the articles reviewed are deficiencies in the results of this study.
Factors that influence patient satisfaction using home care services become input for the provider’s management. Nurses and teams can pay attention to factors that can affect patient satisfaction. There are two factors that do not influence patient satisfaction, namely finances and working time. This will be an evaluation for subsequent research.
Figshare: Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Home Care Services: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.26489203.V1.36
This project contains the following underlying data:
1. PRISMA flow diagram: the number of records identified, included and excluded and the reasons for exclusions in this review.
2. Summary review: The summary review contains an analysis of the selected articles in this review.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “Universal” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Figshare: Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in Home Care Services: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.26489203.V136
This project contains the following extended data:
1. PRISMA checklist: a critical tool in the field of systematic reviews
2. PRISMA flow diagram: the number of records identified, included and excluded and the reasons for exclusions in this review.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “Universal” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
We thank The Center for Higher Education (BPPT) and the Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) for the significant support in the development of this article.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?
Partly
If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: N/A
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Long-term care, Dementia, Late life cognitive impairment, Quality of life and quality of care in long-term care.
Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?
Partly
Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?
Partly
If this is a Living Systematic Review, is the ‘living’ method appropriate and is the search schedule clearly defined and justified? (‘Living Systematic Review’ or a variation of this term should be included in the title.)
Not applicable
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Long-term care, Dementia, Late life cognitive impairment, Quality of life and quality of care in long-term care.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 4 (revision) 29 May 25 |
|||
Version 3 (revision) 20 Jan 25 |
read | ||
Version 2 (revision) 25 Nov 24 |
read | read | |
Version 1 27 Aug 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)