Keywords
orthodontic, hypomineralization, odontoma, impaction, case report, Bleaching, Impaction, Resin-infiltration, Onlay, Esthetic Rehabilitation
This clinical case report presents the comprehensive multidisciplinary management of a 15-year, 7-month-old female patient diagnosed with an odontoma-associated impaction of the mandibular right permanent canine and molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH). While previous studies have addressed these conditions individually, this case illustrates a unique combination requiring surgical, orthodontics, and restorative interventions. The patient presented with esthetic concerns and delayed eruption of the mandibular canine. Clinical examination revealed an Angle’s Class I molar and Class II canine relationship, lingual crossbite of the maxillary right lateral incisor, impaction of the mandibular right permanent canine, retained primary canine, and MIH affecting both anterior teeth and first molars. The treatment plan involved surgical removal of the odontoma to facilitate orthodontic traction of the impacted canine. Subsequently, orthodontic treatment was initiated to correct occlusion and alignment. After successful space management and canine eruption, restorative procedures were carried out to improve the esthetics and function of MIH-affected teeth. This case highlights the importance of early diagnosis, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a customized treatment approach in managing complex mixed dental anomalies. The outcome demonstrated improved function, esthetics, and patient satisfaction.
orthodontic, hypomineralization, odontoma, impaction, case report, Bleaching, Impaction, Resin-infiltration, Onlay, Esthetic Rehabilitation
The following changes were made:
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Jie Jia
Odontoma, a common odontogenic tumor, has a prevalence ranging from 21% to 67% among all oral tumors.1,2 These tumors can be classified into two types based on their morphological features: compound and complex.3 In compound odontomas, enamel and dentin are deposited in a way that the resulting structure resembles normal teeth. On the other hand, complex odontomas exhibit irregular masses of dental tissues. Compound odontomas are more frequent than complex ones. Approximately half of these abnormalities are associated with the impaction of permanent teeth, especially canines.4 The presence of odontoma can disrupt the eruption of permanent teeth, which not only compromises occlusal function and aesthetics but may also adversely affect adjacent teeth by causing root resorption.
Moreover, the global prevalence of MIH ranges from 2.4% to 40.2% across different regions.5,6 Furthermore, the prevalence of MIH in Saudi Arabia ranges from 8.6% to 40.7%.7,8 MIH originates systemically and involves hypomineralization of one to four permanent first molars, often accompanied by affected incisors. The etiology of MIH remains elusive, but it is likely multifactorial, resulting from various environmental factors acting systemically, including prenatal, perinatal, and childhood medical conditions.9 Clinically, teeth affected by MIH exhibit distinct areas of enamel opacities with alterations in translucency, showing a wide variation in color, size, and shape. It can significantly impact a patient’s oral health-related quality of life, causing functional difficulties and aesthetic concerns.10 The best long-term solution involves a combination of minimally invasive treatment options, such as external bleaching, microabrasion, and resin infiltration. However, these treatments may interfere with orthodontic procedures, especially during the adhesion of fixed appliances.11 Additionally, hypomineralized enamel may not withstand forces during active orthodontic treatment or appliance debonding.12
Numerous case studies have documented dental and orthodontic management of odontomas and molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) as separate entities. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the comprehensive management of patients presenting with a combination of odontoma, dental impaction, and MIH. From a clinical perspective, it is crucial for practitioners to be familiar with the comprehensive management of such cases to enhance treatment outcomes and current standards of care. Therefore, the aim of this case report was to present a multidisciplinary approach for managing a patient with a compound odontoma associated with an impacted mandibular canine and MIH.
This case report was conducted in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on medical research. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of the University Hospital (NRR24/061/5). A written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish the current case report and accompanying images. In addition, the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (CARE) guidelines checklist was followed.13
A 15-year and 7-month-old female patient presented to the orthodontic clinic at University Hospital. The main concern of the patient was the appearance of her smile, and she expressed worry about the delayed eruption of her mandibular right permanent canine. The patient had no history of trauma. Furthermore, the patient had iron deficiency anemia and vitamin D deficiency, and she irregularly took iron and vitamin D supplements. Patient also had a history of antibiotics administration for fever at the age of 2 years. During an investigation into teeth discoloration, the patient’s mother reported experiencing stress during pregnancy and had a history of urinary tract infection, which was treated with antibiotics. Additionally, the mother reported prolonged labor during childbirth.
Upon extraoral examination, a convex profile with competent lips was observed in the lateral view. In the frontal view of the non-smiling face, a deviated nose and symmetrical features were evident. When smiling, the frontal view revealed an average smile line with a 90% incisal display, a non-consonant smile arc, and a wide buccal corridor. Notably, there was a 1 mm deviation of the maxillary dental midline to the right relative to the facial midline, with the lower midline coinciding relative to the facial midline.
During intraoral examination, no carious lesions were found. However, mild plaque-induced gingivitis was present around all anterior permanent teeth. The patient exhibited an Angle’s Class I relationship.14 Canine relationships were classified as Class II. Specifically, the upper right permanent lateral incisor was lingually displaced and in a lingual crossbite. Retained lower right primary canine was the result of the odontoma that caused impaction of the lower right permanent canine. Additionally, there was bulging of the alveolar vestibule below the lower right primary canine. The overjet measured 2 mm, and the overbite was 17%. White, yellow, and brown stains were visible on the buccal and occlusal surfaces of the upper and lower permanent first molars. Facial surfaces of the upper right canine, upper central incisors, lower central incisor, and lower right lateral incisor exhibited white or creamy stains. Furthermore, the tooth size-arch length discrepancy was -4 mm in the maxillary arch and -2 mm in the mandibular arch, indicating mild upper and lower crowding (Figure 1).15
Panoramic radiograph was acquired, which showed a radiopaque mass, consisting of multiple small, calcified tooth-like structures, surrounded an oval radiolucent lesion around the crown of the unerupted lower right permanent canine. No root resorption was observed, and no other anomalies or pathologies were noted. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed which confirmed the radiological diagnosis of compound odontoma with impaction of the lower right permanent canine.
Lateral cephalometric radiography indicated cervical vertebral maturation stage V, suggesting that the peak of mandibular growth occurred no earlier than 2 years before this stage.16 The anteroposterior position of the maxillary and mandibular jawbones showed an SNA of 81°, an SNB of 77°, and an ANB of 4°, indicating skeletal class II due to the retrognathic mandible. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) measured 24°, with a normodivergent mandibular plane angle.
Regarding the upper anterior relation to the anterior cranial base, the SN-U1 angle was 104° (within the normal range), and the mandibular plane angle (IMPA) and Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) were 97° and 58°, respectively, indicating lingual inclination of the mandibular anterior teeth. The upper and lower lip positions relative to Ricketts’ esthetic line (E-line) were -2 mm and 2 mm, respectively, indicating a normal lip position.17,18 Figure 2A-F displays the radiographs, and Table 1 summarizes the cephalometric analysis.
The clinical appearance, combined with the radiographic findings, showed a diagnosis of compound odontoma associated with impacted mandibular right permanent canine. Transillumination assessment of the stains was performed by positioning the tip of a light-emitting diode (LED) light-curing unit at the palatal/lingual surfaces of teeth. Dark and intense color was observed which indicated towards deep stains (Figure 3). Considering both clinical and medical history, MIH was also diagnosed. According to the MIH-Treatment Need Index (MIH-TNI) criteria, the case was classified as MIH without hypersensitivity and without defect extension (MIH TNI 1).9
The patient underwent surgical extraction of the lower right primary canine and excision of the odontoma. The surgical incision extended from the lower right second premolar to the lower right permanent central incisor. A distal releasing incision was made near the lower right second premolar, followed by subperiosteal dissection on the lingual side where the bulge was located. The odontoma was then removed intact. A subperiosteal flap exposed the lower right permanent canine, and buttons were placed on its lingual surface for traction. The biopsy sample was sent to the Oral Pathology Department, confirming a diagnosis of compound odontoma.
The bonding of all upper and lower permanent teeth (except the lower right permanent canine) was carried out using a pre-adjusted edgewise appliance (0.018” × 0.025”) with the MBT prescription system (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) and 3MTM Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M company, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA). Additionally, the bracket of the upper right permanent lateral incisor was reversed to torque the root forward. Orthodontic bands were applied instead of molar tubes on all permanent first molars to enhance retention due to compromised enamel mineralization. Notably, the bracket bonding strength was suitable for both the upper and lower anterior teeth, and the patient did not encounter any instances of bracket bonding failure.
Initially, the upper and lower dentitions were leveled and aligned using 0.014-inch and 0.016-inch nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. Subsequently, 0.016-inch stainless steel (SS) archwires were prescribed. After 6 months of treatment, a follow-up panoramic radiograph was taken to assess root parallelism. Some brackets were repositioned, and the archwires were downgraded to 0.016-inch NiTi. Later, the wires were progressed to 0.016-inch by 0.022-inch SS. An open-coil spring was then used to create space for the upper right permanent incisors and shift the upper midline toward the left side. Additionally, another open-coil spring was placed to create space for the lower right permanent canine. Traction was applied to the lower right permanent canine using an elastic chain with an average force of 60 grams. After 3 months, the lower right permanent canine began to erupt. Lingual root torque was applied to this tooth during the finishing stage. Finally, a 0.017-inch by 0.025-inch SS wire, along with class II elastics (60 grams), was used to achieve a class I canine relationship. Retention included a lower fixed retainer with an overlay Hawley retainer, while the upper arch was retained using an upper Hawley retainer. The total treatment duration was 25 months.
Post-orthodontic follow-up was conducted at the time-point of 26 months. Upon examining the frontal view of the face, the maxillary dental midline aligned precisely with the lip philtrum and facial midline. The smile, as seen from the frontal view, displayed a harmonious smile arc with full visibility of the upper incisors. Intraoral examination revealed an Angle’s class I relationship, with appropriate overjet and overbite for the canines (Figure 4). Panoramic radiography confirmed proper root parallelism without any periodontal abnormalities. Additionally, both upper and lower third molars were in the developmental stage.
The cephalometric evaluation showed no significant change in both the SNA and SNB angles. The FMA angle increased slightly by 1°, indicating a minor clockwise rotation of the mandible. Dental analysis showed that the SN-U1 angle remained unchanged, but U1-NA decreased by 2°, suggesting forward displacement of the Nasion landmark. For the mandibular anterior teeth, the L1-NB angle increased by 4°, IMPA increased by 4°, and FMIA decreased by 1°, indicating labial tipping of the lower central incisors. The inter-incisal angle decreased by 4°, reflecting proclination of both upper and lower anterior teeth.
Soft tissue analysis revealed slight retrusion of the upper and lower lips relative to the E line (Figure 5A, Figure 5B and Table 1). A cephalometric superimposition was performed using the Dolphin imaging software (Dolphin version 11.59, Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA, USA) available at (https://www.dolphinimaging.com), which showed slight extrusion of the permanent first molars and proclination of upper and lower incisors (Figure 6A and Figure 6B). Following completion of orthodontic treatment, the patient was referred to a restorative dentist to enhance the aesthetics of the hypomineralized anterior teeth.
(A) Overall superimposition: the black tracing indicates pretreatment (15 years, 7 months) and the red tracing indicates posttreatment (17 years, 8 months). (B) Maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition; the black tracing indicates pretreatment (15 years, 7 months) and the red tracing indicates posttreatment (17 years, 8 months).
Preventive strategies included educating both parents and patient about dental hygiene and caries prevention procedures at home, such as the use of fluoridated toothpaste. In-office measures included application of Fisseal Light Curing Pit and Fissure Sealant with Fluorides (PROMEDICA Dental Material GmbH, Germany) and professional fluoride in the form of gel to minimize dental caries and sensitivity. In addition, NovaMin® (GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Weybridge, Surrey, UK) dentifrice was prescribed to enhance dental remineralization and desensitization.9
When treating patients with hypersensitivity, it is important to implement additional preventive measures during bleaching, resin infiltration, and orthodontic treatment. For bleaching, using lower concentrations of the bleaching agent and limiting contact time is recommended. In resin infiltration, pre-treatment with fluoride varnishes or hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based desensitizers (e.g., Gluma) helps occlude dentinal tubules, while post-operative application of fluoride or calcium phosphate reinforces enamel and reduces sensitivity. Prior to orthodontic treatment, the regular use of desensitizing toothpaste is advised. Gentle orthodontic forces, along with periodic fluoride varnish or sealant applications—particularly on affected first molars—further aid in managing hypersensitivity.19
5.2.1 Bleaching
In light of the patient’s age, a minimally invasive approach was suggested to enhance the aesthetic condition of the teeth rather than traditional restorative treatment. Initially, dental prophylaxis using a non-drying, splatter-free Qartz prophy paste containing 1.23% fluoride and 0.1 molar phosphate (PearsonTM Dental, Sylmar, CA, USA) mixed with water (2:1 ratio) and supragingival scraping with periodontal curettes were used to stabilize the oral environment. In the subsequent session, the initial tooth shade was visually assessed using validated method the VITA classical A1-D4® shade guide. Required license has been obtained for the use of this tool (VitaZähnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany).20 The upper incisors ranged from shades A3 to A3.5, while the canines were shade A3.5. The lower incisors were shade A3.5, and the canines were A4 ( Figure 7A-C).
(A) The upper incisors were presented in shade A3, and the canines in shade A3.5. (B) The lower teeth were presented in shade A3.5 for incisors, and (C) in shade A4 for canines.
A digital impression was obtained using 3Shape CAD/CAM TRIOS® 4 and bleaching trays were created using Rubber Transparent (3A Medes Easy Vac Gaskets, India). Before using the trays, their proper adaptation to the teeth and gingival tissues was assessed. At the beginning of the bleaching session, a gingival barrier (OpalDam®, Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA) was applied and light-cured for 20 seconds on the gingival contour of all teeth to protect against mucosal irritation. For the home bleaching technique, Opalescence® Boost 40% (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA) was used, a hydrogen peroxide-based agent prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two 20-minute applications of the bleaching agent were performed. After each session, the teeth were thoroughly rinsed with water. Subsequently, neutral colorless NovaBright™ 5% sodium fluoride varnish (Nanova Biomaterials, Inc., Columbia, Missouri, USA) was applied and allowed to dry for 10 minutes (Figure 8A-B).
To achieve more satisfactory aesthetic results, a second home bleaching treatment was performed using carbamide peroxide gel Opalescence™ PF 35% (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UTAH, USA). The treatment involved daily application for 30 to 60 minutes over two weeks, followed by the use of sodium fluoride varnish. In the first week, the bleaching material was applied daily, and in the second week, it was used every day. At the end of each week the patient’s teeth and gingival tissues were evaluated. The patient received tooth whitening instructions, including tips to avoid coffee, soft drinks, and citrus fruit juices.
After both bleaching procedures were finished, a 2-week waiting period was observed before the final shade evaluation during the patient’s recall visit. The patient’s teeth appeared brighter, with noticeable improvement in previously discolored areas. Figure 9 illustrates the results of home bleaching, showing the upper incisors, upper canines, lower incisors, and lower canines in shade A2.
5.2.2 Resin infiltration
To improve the translucency and esthetics of teeth, resin infiltration was planned as next step after bleaching. The Icon® Vestibular (DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The affected teeth were isolated using a rubber dam (Sanctuary® Powder-free Latex Silk Blue Dental Dam, Malaysia) and a clamp (HuFriedyGroup, STERIS, USA). A 15% hydrochloric acid was applied to the lesion using the 0.45 ml (Icon Etch, DMG, Hamburg, Germany). After allowing it to sit for 2 minutes, the tooth was rinsed with water for 30 seconds and dried using an air spray. After the third etching round, a 0.45 ml ethanol (Icon Dry, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied to remove the water retained in the microporosities of the enamel, letting it last for 30 seconds. Subsequently, infiltrating resin was applied to the lesion using the 0.45 ml (Icon-Infiltrant, DMG, Hamburg, Germany). The resin infiltrant was massaged onto the lesion surface in circular movements for 3 minutes, ensuring thorough penetration. The excess resin was removed with air-spray and dental floss. Finally, the resin infiltrant was polymerized for 40 seconds using a light-cure device (Planmeca Lumion™ Plus polymerization light, Planmeca OY, Finland). The treatment protocol involved three rounds of hydrochloric acid application (2 minutes each) followed by a 10-minute infiltration period. An additional minute of treatment was administered after the initial infiltrating procedure. Upon completion, the rubber dam and clamps were removed, and surface finishing was performed using fine-grained polishing burs and the dental composite polishing diamond system RA Disc 14mm Wheel (Rubber Wheel, AZDENT, China) (Figure 10A-H).
5.2.3 Restoration of posterior teeth
An indirect onlay restoration was performed on the upper right first molar due to cusp involvement (Figure 11A-B). During the onlay preparation, efforts were made to completely remove the hypomineralized enamel and place the final preparation margins on sound, unaffected enamel. Approximately 1.5 mm reduction was done for the functional cusps (distolingual), and 1 mm reduction for the nonfunctional cusps (distobuccal). A butt joint margin was prepared using a long round end taper (856L) bur. A digital impression was obtained using the 3Shape CAD/CAM TRIOS 4 system. The temporary restoration was fabricated using the Ivoclar Vivadent Systemp. In the laboratory procedure, two sets of casts were printed using JamgHe 10K Standard Plus Resin for an LCD DLP SLA 405nm 3D Printer (High Transparent, 1000 g). The ceramic onlay was created using Ivoclar Vivadent AGFL-9494 Schaan/Liechtenstein in shade A2.
During the try-in visit, the onlay was placed, followed by a bitewing radiograph. Subsequently, the onlay was etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds, and a silane coupling agent (Deutschland GmbH Germany 3M ESPE) was applied for 1 minute. The temporary restoration was removed, and the molar was cleaned and etched using 37% phosphoric acid (ScotchbondTM Multi-Purpose Etchant, 3M ESPE) for 15 seconds, followed by rinsing with water for 15 seconds and drying with high-volume suction. The bonding agent (AdperTM Single Bond Plus, 3M ESPE) was actively applied, and dual-cure resin cement (RelyXTM Unicem 2 Clicker™100, 3M ESPE) was used for final cementation. After cementation, occlusion was assessed, and the onlay was finished and polished.
The patient was followed up three months later after orthodontic debonding and restorative treatment (Figure 12). Oral hygiene was reinforced, and retainers were checked. Additionally, the patient exhibited no temporomandibular joint symptoms, and gingiva remained healthy. The patient was satisfied with the treatment outcomes and experienced improvements in esthetics and mastication. Her self-esteem increased significantly. Moreover, she was informed about the potential need for future extraction of all third molars.
The present case report describes a comprehensive management strategy for a patient with compound odontoma associated with impacted canine and MIH. The management involved the removal of odontoma to allow for orthodontic traction of the lower permanent right canine. Thereafter, esthetic appearance of the teeth was improved through restorative treatment.
When considering the presence of odontomas associated with impacted teeth, it is important to highlight that the decision to remove it and extrude the impacted tooth varies based on patient-specificity. The failure rate for traction of the mandibular canines has been documented to be 17%.21 However, successful traction was possible in the present case. At the same instance, it is important to highlight that alternative treatment options should be opted where traction of the mandibular canine could be challenging owing to the deep location of impaction, possibility of ankylosis and presence of critical sized defect following odontoma removal. If ankylosis existed with deep impaction an alternative treatment option would be to extract the lower right permanent canine, excise the odontoma, mesialize the lower right posterior segment, and substitute the lower right first premolar for the lower right permanent canine. In addition, bone grafting should be opted for cases with large defects following odontoma removal, where traction of canine is planned. In the present case no grafting was performed owing to the small dimensions of the odontoma. However, future radiological studies are recommended to assess the impact of grafting and size of defect on the orthodontic traction of impacted teeth following odontoma removal.
In relation to MIH, it is a clinically challenging condition due to the compromised bonding of fixed orthodontic appliances. A failure of bracket system adherence to the defective enamel structure occurs, and the bracket may not be able to withstand active orthodontic forces. However, the presented patient did not experience bracket bonding failure or compromised orthodontic movement, as the hypocalcification was present on the incisal edge of the anterior teeth away from the bracket position. In cases with extended hypocalcification inhibiting the application of brackets, it has been proposed to either apply glass ionomer cement-based adhesives or perform microabrasion on hypomineralized enamel before etching.22 In addition, a study suggested that enamel deproteinization with 5% sodium hypochlorite prior to the bonding procedure might improve the bonding performance of resin adhesives to the hypomineralized enamel.23
Debonding is another challenging factor in cases of MIH. Removal of the fixed orthodontic appliance could create stress on the defective enamel structure and lead to loss of the affected enamel with microfractures.12 In this case, a low-speed white stone bur was used to reduce damage to the enamel structure. A recent study also suggested the use of a laser or thermal method to reduce enamel fractures.24 In addition, hypersensitivity among patients with MIH has been reported owing to increased porosity and high protein concentrations.25 One potential cause of hypersensitivity in MIH is the inflammatory response in the pulp due to oral bacteria penetrating through the hypomineralized enamel into the dentinal tubules.26 Additionally, tooth hypersensitivity related to MIH also seems to be present in disintegrated molars immediately after tooth eruption. The management of such a condition involves preventive and therapeutic approaches, such as using fluoride varnishes and casein-based products.27 However, the presented case did not report any sensitivity.
The presented patient experienced unpleasant white spot lesions on the anterior teeth, prompting bleaching and resin infiltration. As a result, smile aesthetics improved, and the patient expressed satisfaction with the final outcome. A recent systematic review also advocated for using resin infiltration to conceal enamel fluorosis, while another study highlighted the effectiveness of bleaching as a treatment approach.
The primary strength of the case report lies in its first-time documentation of the comprehensive management of a patient with compound odontoma associated with an impacted tooth and MIH. However, it is important to interpret the findings with caution, as a single case cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship. To confirm treatment outcomes and establish patient-specific treatment guidelines, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are recommended.
The case report highlights the successful management of a patient with compound odontoma, an impacted mandibular canine, and MIH. The treatment approach involved surgically removing the odontoma, followed by orthodontic intervention to guide the impacted canine into its proper position. Due to the presence of MIH, the orthodontic intervention was altered to include orthodontic bands instead of molar tubes, for improved retention and a conservative debonding procedure was performed with a low-speed handpiece. Additionally, cosmetic dental treatment was performed using bleaching and resin infiltration for the anterior teeth, and onlay restoration for maxillary right first molar.
Conceptualization, N.A. and K.A.; Data curation, K. A. and M.A.A.; formal analysis, K.A., M.A., M.A.A., F.O.A., and S.S.; funding acquisition, N. A.; investigation, N.A., K.A., M.A., M.A.A., and F.O.A.; methodology, N.A.; project administration, N. A.; resources, N.A.; software, K.A.; supervision, N. A., M.A., and S.S.; validation, N.A.; visualization, N. A. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N. A.; writing—review and editing, N. A., K. A., M.A., M.A.A., F.O.A., and S.S.
A written informed consent was obtained from the patient and parents to publish the current case report and accompanying images.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
No
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
No
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
References
1. Al-Ani R, Aldelaimi T, Khalil A, Abdulkareem S: Ectopic upper third molar embedded in a dentigerous cyst of the maxillary sinus: a case report and literature review. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2024; 40 (1). Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: dentist
Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?
Yes
Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?
Yes
Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?
Yes
Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: dentist
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 3 (revision) 23 Jul 25 |
||
Version 2 (revision) 20 Feb 25 |
read | read |
Version 1 27 Aug 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)