ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Giant adrenal pseudocyst presenting with dysuria: a rare case report

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 14 Nov 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

Adrenal pseudocysts are rare and usually asymptomatic lesions of the adrenal gland, often discovered incidentally during imaging or post-mortem examination. When large, they may cause compressive symptoms. We report a case of a giant adrenal pseudocyst presenting with flank pain and dysuria.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man presented with left flank pain, upper abdominal pressure, and dysuria for three months. Imaging revealed a large left retroperitoneal cystic mass displacing adjacent organs. The patient underwent surgical excision with left adrenalectomy. Histopathology confirmed a giant adrenal pseudocyst.

Discussion

Adrenal pseudocysts are uncommon and often misdiagnosed preoperatively. Symptoms are typically related to mass effect when lesions are large. CT imaging helps localize the lesion, but definitive diagnosis relies on histopathology. Surgical excision is recommended for symptomatic or large lesions.

Conclusion

Giant adrenal pseudocysts are rare but should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal cystic masses. Surgery is indicated in symptomatic or uncertain cases to relieve symptoms and confirm the diagnosis.

Keywords

Adrenal pseudocyst, retroperitoneal mass, Adrenalectomy, Case report

Introduction

Adrenal pseudocysts are rare, non-functional lesions accounting for a small fraction of adrenal incidentalomas. They are typically asymptomatic and discovered incidentally during imaging studies or autopsy. Their pathogenesis remains unclear and they are often mistaken for other retroperitoneal cystic masses. When large, adrenal pseudocysts can cause compressive symptoms involving adjacent organs. Despite advances in imaging modalities, diagnosis often remains uncertain preoperatively, with histopathology required for confirmation. This case describes a giant adrenal pseudocyst presenting with dysuria and flank pain, illustrating its clinical, radiological, and pathological features. This report complies with the CARE Checklist guidelines.11

Case presentation

A 70-year-old man with no significant medical history presented with a three-month history of left flank pain, upper abdominal pressure, and dysuria. He denied trauma, fever, hematuria, or weight loss, and had no personal or family history of malignancy or endocrine disorders. Physical examination revealed a firm, painless mass in the left upper quadrant. Laboratory investigations, including renal function, adrenal hormonal profile, and complete blood count, were normal.

Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT ( Figure 1) showed a large, well-circumscribed, left retroperitoneal cystic mass (15 cm) displacing the spleen superiorly and kidney inferiorly. The left adrenal gland appeared displaced but morphologically normal. Mild left pyelocaliceal dilatation suggested ureteropelvic junction compression. No solid or enhancing components were seen. Possible diagnoses included liquefied adrenal hematoma or cystic lymphangioma.

8656c3a9-8e6b-4e6e-85b4-64193617c32b_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan showing a large, well-circumscribed left retroperitoneal cystic mass (~15 cm in diameter) displacing the spleen superiorly and the left kidney inferiorly.

Mild left pyelocaliceal dilatation is visible, suggesting ureteropelvic junction compression.

Surgical exploration via midline laparotomy revealed a large retroperitoneal cystic mass adherent to the adrenal gland and adjacent organs ( Figure 2A). Complete resection with left adrenalectomy was performed ( Figure 2B). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day five.

8656c3a9-8e6b-4e6e-85b4-64193617c32b_figure2.gif

Figure 2. A: Intraoperative view showing a large retroperitoneal cystic mass adherent to the left adrenal gland and compressing adjacent organs including the spleen and pancreas. B: Gross specimen after surgical excision, showing complete removal of the cyst along with the left adrenal gland (adrenalectomy).

Gross examination ( Figure 3A) showed a unilocular cyst measuring 14 × 11 × 7 cm with a thick fibrous wall and hemorrhagic content. Microscopy ( Figure 3B) revealed a fibrous wall with calcifications, chronic inflammation, cholesterol clefts, and multinucleated giant cells, but no epithelial lining—confirming an adrenal pseudocyst. Adjacent adrenal parenchyma was compressed but otherwise normal.

8656c3a9-8e6b-4e6e-85b4-64193617c32b_figure3.gif

Figure 3. A: Macroscopic image of the resected cystic lesion demonstrating a unilocular cyst measuring 14 × 11 × 7 cm with a thick fibrous wall and hemorrhagic content. B: Microscopic examination (H&E stain, ×100) showing a fibrous wall with calcifications, chronic inflammation, cholesterol clefts, and multinucleated giant cells. No epithelial lining is identified, confirming the diagnosis of an adrenal pseudocyst.

Discussion

Adrenal pseudocysts are rare,1 accounting for about 5–7% of adrenal incidentalomas.2 They lack epithelial lining and are thought to arise from prior hemorrhage, infection, or degeneration.3 Most are asymptomatic and found incidentally, but those exceeding 10 cm can cause symptoms due to mass effect.1,35

In this case, the pseudocyst compressed the urinary tract, explaining the dysuria. Similar presentations have been described with ureteral or gastrointestinal compression.6,7 CT imaging aids localization but cannot reliably distinguish benign from malignant cystic lesions.8 Differential diagnoses include adrenal hemorrhage, cystic lymphangioma, pancreatic pseudocyst, and cystic adrenal neoplasms.9

Histology remains the diagnostic gold standard. The absence of epithelial lining and presence of cholesterol clefts and giant cells confirmed the pseudocyst.10 Although most adrenal cysts are benign, up to 7% may harbor malignancy.2,3,10 Management depends on size, symptoms, hormonal activity, and malignancy risk. Lesions fewer than 5 cm can be monitored; larger, symptomatic, or uncertain lesions require surgical excision.3,9 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is suitable for small lesions, while open surgery is preferred for giant or suspicious masses, as in this case.

Conclusion

Adrenal pseudocyst is a rare entity, particularly when reaching giant size. Surgical intervention is essential for symptomatic or uncertain cases to relieve symptoms and establish a definitive diagnosis. Given the non-specific radiological and clinical characteristics, histopathological examination remains crucial.

Patient perspective

The patient expressed satisfaction with the outcome and was relieved by the resolution of his symptoms. He appreciated the clarity of communication and quality of care throughout diagnosis and treatment.

Strengths and limitations

This report highlights a rare presentation of a giant adrenal pseudocyst revealed by atypical urinary symptoms, which is scarcely described in the literature. A key strength is the detailed radiological and histopathological documentation. A limitation is the short follow-up period and lack of long-term outcome data.

Ethical approval

Not applicable for single case reports according to institutional guidelines.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Nov 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Khedhiri N, Mbarek A, Jouini R et al. Case Report: Giant adrenal pseudocyst presenting with dysuria: a rare case report [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:1254 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172071.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 14 Nov 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.