ALL Metrics
-
Views
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Fixed-point Acceleration Algorithm of Total Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Fallujah Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation gateway.

Abstract

The fixed-point iteration method is a powerful tool in analysis and its extensions in other branches. It provides a unified structure for proving existence and uniqueness results for various nonlinear problems. This study, conducted within the scope of a real Banach space enriched by uniform convexity, presents an accelerated four-step iterative scheme designed to approximate elements of the fixed-point set corresponding to a mapping called a total asymptotically nonexpansive (briefly, TAN) mapping. The results of weak and strong convergence for the proposed method are established. The results relating to weak convergence require Opial’s condition of the normed space, while the results relating to strong convergence require the addition of the semi-compactness assumption of the mapping under consideration to the previous assumptions. Additionally, numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the algorithm’s effectiveness and compare it with previously established approaches. These findings extend and refine several recent contributions available in the literature. Lastly, the work includes an application to 2- dimensional equations.

Keywords

Banach Spaces, Iterative Schemes, Total Asymptotically Non-Expansive Mappings, Fixed Points, Strong Convergence, Weak Convergence, Stability.

Introduction

In Banach spaces, fixed-point theory has evolved through a series of extensions of contractive-type mappings. One of the earliest key contributions was made by Browder (1965) and Kirk (1965) in,1,2 who initiated the study of nonexpansive mappings and established essential fixed-point results in uniformly convex Banach spaces. This was extended later by Goebel and Kirk (1972) in,3 who introduced asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, there by widening the scope of fixed-point theory by considering operators whose iterates approach the nonexpansive property in an asymptotic sense. Building on these developments, Alber, Chidume, and Zegeye (2005) in4 proposed the class of totally asymptotically nonexpansive TAN-mappings. A mapping Ψ:XX is defined as TAN-mapping if nonnegative real sequences ,{κv} where μv0,κv0asv , together with a strictly increasing continuous function :++ satisfying (0)=0 such that for all x,yX .

(1)
ΨvxΨvyxy+μv(xy)+κvholds forallv1

This generalization incorporates both nonexpansive and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings as particular cases. Since its introduction, the concept of TAN-mapping has primarily been explored through iterative schemes in Banach spaces. Among the earliest adaptations were the classical Mann and Ishikawa iterations, later followed by the Halpern iteration in uniformly convex Banach spaces.10 More recently, Abed and Abed (2022) in5 investigated the Fibonacci–Halpern iteration for monotone TAN-mappings in partially ordered Banach spaces, establishing its stability and showing faster convergence compared with Mann and Halpern iterations. In 2023, Salman and Abed24 proposed a five-step iterative scheme for (λ,ρ)-firmly nonexpansive multivalued mappings in modular spaces, demonstrating that these satisfy both the (UUC1) property and the Δ2-condition. Khomphungson and Nammanee (2024) further analyzed modified Mann–Ishikawa algorithms, proving strong convergence under Condition (A) in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Moreover, Balooee and Al-Homidan (2024) in4,7 developed hybrid resolvent-based methods that connect fixed-point problems of TAN-mappings with generalized variational-like inclusions, ensuring the existence of a common element belonging simultaneously to the solution set of such problems and to the fixed-point set of a TAN-mapping. These formulations are closely related to integral and differential equations, which are frequently reformulated as operator inclusions within Banach spaces. Moreover, recent studies have enriched and broadened the theoretical perspective. For instance, Galisu et al. (2024)8 introduced enriched asymptotically nonexpansive mappings with center zero in a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space, there by providing a broader framework that incorporates TAN-mappings. Similarly, Sun (2025)9 extended the theory to random asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in uniformly convex modules, emphasizing stochastic extensions still tied to Banach-type structures. In summary, as reported in,1,2 the research direction has progressed from nonexpansive mappings3 to asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, culminating in the more general class of TAN-mappings.4 A wide variety of iterative schemes such as Mann, Ishikawa, Halpern, Fibonacci-Halpern, modified Mann-Ishikawa, and hybrid resolvent-based algorithms have played a crucial role in establishing convergence, stability, and practical applications. More recent findings in5,6 reaffirm the central significance of TAN-mappings in contemporary fixed-point theory within Banach spaces, particularly in relation to stability outcomes and their applications to variational inclusions and integral-differential models.

The primary objective of this work is to examine the convergence and stability characteristics of an inertial accelerated iterative scheme within the framework of TAN-mappings in Banach spaces. Building upon the inertial accelerated approach proposed by Harbau et al. (2022),10 we establish and prove weak and strong convergence results for the introduced process and further confirm its stability when subjected to perturbations. Moreover, a comparative study with two alternative iterative methods is conducted, demonstrating that the inertial accelerated scheme attains faster convergence. Finally, the obtained convergence results are applied to integral equations, highlighting both the practical importance and the applicability of the theoretical outcomes.

Preliminaries

This part includes requirements for definitions, lemmas, and facts for proving the main results.

Definition 1.

11 If X is a Banach space named uniformly convex if for any ϵ(0,2), δ(ϵ)>0p+q21δ(ϵ) holds, for all p,qX with p1,q1 , and pqϵ .

Remark 1.

10 Note that every Hilbert space satisfies Definition (1)

Symbols

  • i) X denotes the real Banach Space.

  • ii) X denotes the dual of a space X .

  • iii) ⇀ is used for weak convergence, while ⟶ is used for strong convergence.

  • iv) The set of ω - weak cluster limits of a sequence {qv} is ωc(qv)={z:qvkz} represents.

  • v) Fix(Ψ){p in X:Ψ(p)=p} , all fixed points of Ψ .

Definition 2.

10 Let .,. be a duality pairing on X×X . A mapping Jφ:X2X defined as Jφ(p)={pX:p,p=pp,p=φ(p)} and φ be a gauge function is a generalized duality mapping.

Note, if φ(t)=t for all t0 then Jφ=J2 is a normalized duality mapping and can be expressed as J(p)={pX:p,p=p2,p=p} .

Definition 3.

12 A mapping Ψ:CXC is called weakly sequentially continuous if, for all sequences {qv} in X with qvz , it follows that (qv)Ψ(z) .

Definition 4.

13 A mapping Ψ: Ψ:CXCis called

  • (1) Demi-closed at y0C , if {qv} in C such that qvzC and Ψqvy0 , then Ψq0=y0 .

  • (2) Semi-compact if limvqvΨqv=0 , for any bounded sequence {qv}C then a subsequence {qvk}{qv} and qvkzC.

Suppose a fixed-point iteration scheme is defined by a general form

(2)
qv+1=f(Ψ,qv)
for v=0,1,2,, for a mapping Ψ and q0X . This ensures the convergence of {qv}v=0 to zFix(Ψ) . Where f(Ψ,qv) does contain all parameters that define the given fixed-point iteration scheme.

Definition 5.

14 Let {pv}v=0 be an arbitrary sequence in X and fix εv=pv+1f(Ψ,pv) for =0,1,2,.. . Then qv+1=f(Ψ,pv) is Ψ -stable (or stable) with respect to Ψ if and only if.

limvεv=0limvpv=z.

Definition 6.

15 Suppose {qv}v=0 and {sv}v=1 are two sequences converging to the same fixed point z with qvzav, and svzbv for all v0 . If the sequence ava and bvb and additionally limvavabvb=0, then {qv}v=1 is said to converge to z faster than {sv}v=1 .

Definition 7.

16 A space X has Opial’s condition if for all {qv}X with qvz1 satisfied limvsupqvz1<limvsupqvz2 z2X and z2z1 .

Definition 8.

23 A set C is convex if λq+(1λ)sC, for any q,s in C and λ[0,1] .

The Lemma below is known as Opial’s property.

Lemma 1.

17 If a duality mapping J is weakly continuous on X , and a sequence {qv}X with qvz , then for any

(3)
pX.limvinfqvplimvinfqvz

Moreover, if X is uniformly convex, equality occurs ⬄ p=z .

Lemma 2.

18 Suppose X is a real uniformly convex Banach space and CX is a closed convex. If Ψ:CC TAN-mapping, then ( IΨ ) is demiclosed at zero, whenever {qv} is a sequence in C such that qvz .

Lemma 3.

19 Assume {av},{bv}, and {cv} are nonnegative sequences such that av+1(1+cv)av+bv , v=0bv< and v=0cv<,v0 then :

  • (i) {av} is convergent.

  • (ii) If limvinfav=0 then limvav=0 .

Lemma 4.

20 A Banach space X is uniformly convex if and only if there exists a continuous, strictly increasing function g:[0,)[0,)] with g(0)=0, such that: λp+(1λ)q2λp2+(1λ)qpλ(1λ)g(pq) , holds for all p,qinBr={pX:pr}and everyλ[0,1] and a fixed number r>0 .

Lemma 5.

22 A Banach space X is uniformly convex and 0<b<c<1 , which is constant. Let {av} sequence in [b,c] such that limvavqv+(1av)sv=d,limvsupqvd,limvsupsvd , satisfy for some d0. Then limvqvsv=0 , where {qv},{sv}X.

Main results

This section is devoted to presenting results concerning weak and strong convergence, stability, and comparative analysis, as well as an illustrative example and application. Below, X will be a Banach space with uniformly convexity.

Weak convergence

The following Assumptions appeared in21

Assumption 1.

  • (i) Choose sequences {αv}(0,1),{σv},{δv}[0,) and v=1δv< with δv=o(σv) which means limnδvσv=0.

  • (ii) Let q0,q1X given, for the terms qv1 and qv for each v1 choose ωv , such that 0ωvωv¯ . For any η3 define

(4)
ωv¯{min{v1v+η1,δvqvqv1},ifqvqv1v1v+η1,otherwise

Remark 2.

From the given Assumption, it directly follows that for every v1, the relation.

ωvqvqv1δv

Which together with v=1δv< and limvδvσv=0 , holds

(5)
v=1ωvqvqv1<
and
(6)
limvωvσvqvqv1limnδvσv=0

Theorem 1.

Let X satisfy Opial’s property and Ψ:XX TAN-mapping associated with the sequences {μv},{κv}(0,) and a strictly increasing continuous function :++ such that (0)=0 and v=1(μv+κv)< . Define the sequence {qv} as: let.

(7)
{q0,q1Xav=qv+ωv(qvqv1)bv+1=1ρ(Ψv(av)av)+σvbvpv=av+ρbv+1qv+1=λαvav+(1λαv)pv,v1,
where λ(0,1],ρ>0 and

(C1)v=0σv<

(C2)limvinfλαv(1λαv)>0

(C3){Ψvavav} is bounded.

If Assumption (i) holds, b1=1ρ(Ψ1a0a0) and Fix(Ψ) , then qvzFix(Ψ) .

Proof:.

The outlines of the proof are the following steps:

  • 1. Proof {bv} is bounded.

  • 2. limvqvz exists for any zFix(Ψ)

  • 3. limvqvΨqv=0

  • 4. ωc(qv)Fix(Ψ)

  • 5. {qv} is ω -convergence to a fixed point.

For (1), the condition ( C1 ) implies limvσv=0, so v0N such that σn12 , for every vv0 . Put M1 as follows:

M1max{max1kv0bk,(2ρ)supvNΨvavav}

Then, by (C3), the M1< hold. Assume that bnM1 for some vv0 , then:

(8)
bv+1=1ρ(Ψvavav)+σvbv1ρΨvavav+σvbvM1
This implies to bvM1,forallv0then{bv}is bounded.

For (2), from the scheme (7), this is obtained by:

(9)
pv=av+ρbv+1=av+ρ(1ρ(Ψvavav)+σvbv)=Ψvav+ρσvbv

By (8), (9), and for any zFix(Ψ), getting:

(10)
pvz=Ψvav+ρσvbvzΨvavz+ρσvbvavz+μv(avz)+κv+ρM1σv

Let U=sup{av+avz}<, ζv=μv(U)+κv

Additionally,

(11)
avz=qvz+ωv(qvqv1)qvz+ωv(qvqv1)

By (10) and (11), getting:

pvzqvz+ωv(qvqv1)+κv+ρM1σv=qvz+σv[ωvσv(qvqv1)+κvσv+ρM1]

By Remark 2, getting that the sequence ωvσv(qvqv1) converges, then M2>0 such that for every v1,ωvσv(qvqv1)+κvσv+ρM1M2 .

Thus:

(12)
pvzqvz+σvM2

Now, using (10), (12), and for some M3>0 any zFix(Ψ) getting:

(13)
qv+1z=λαvav+(1λαv)pvzλαvavz+(1λαv)pvzλαv[qvz+ωv(qvqv1)]+(1λαv)pvzλαvqvz+ωvλαv(qvqv1)+(1λαv)qvz+(1λαv)σvM2
qv+1zqvz+σvM3,
where
(14)
ωvλαvσv(qvqv1)+(1λαv)M2M3

Hence, from Lemma 5 and (C1), it follows that limvqvz exists. As a result, the sequence {qv} is bounded.

For (3) the above step follows that {av} is bounded, and thus {Ψvav} is bounded as well. Define r=supv1{av,Ψvav} and by condition (13), Lemma 4, and hypothesis C1, getting.

qv+1z2=λαvav+(1λαv)pvz2avz2+(1λαv)ζv2λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)+ρ2σv2M122λαvρ2σv2M12+λ2ρ2αv2σv2M12+2(1λαv)ρσvM1(avz+(1λαv)ζv)

Since the limvqvz exists for any zFix(Ψ) , then by applying (5) and (11), L>0 such that avzL

qv+1z2avz2+(1λαv)ζv2λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)+ρ2σv2M122λαvρ2σv2M12+λ2ρ2αv2σv2M12+2(1λαv)ρσvM1(L+(1λαv)ζv)qvz2+2ωvqvqv1qvz+(ωvqvqv1)2λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)+ρ2σv2M122λαvρ2σv2M12+λ2ρ2αv2σv2M12+2(1λαv)ρσvM1(L+(1λαv)ζv)

Because the limnqvz exists for any z Fix(Ψ) , the sequence {qvz} is bounded; hence, H>0 such that qvzH for all v1 . Then

qv+1z2qvz2+2ωvqvqv1H+(ωnqvqv1)2λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)+ρ2σv2M122λαvρ2σv2M12+λ2ρ2αv2σv2M12+2(1λαv)ρσvM1(L+(1λαv)ζv)

Therefore,

λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)qvz2qv+1z2+2ωvqvqv1H+(ωnqvqv1)2+ρ2σv2M122λαvρ2σv2M12+λ2ρ2αv2σv2M12+2(1λαv)ρσvM1(L+(1λαv)ζv)

So,

v=0λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)q0z2+2Hv=0ωvqvqv1+v=0(ωvqvqv1)2+M12ρ2v=0σv2+2λρ2M12v=0αvσv2+λ2ρ2M12v=0αv2σv2+v=02(1λαv)ρσvM1(L+(1λαv)ζv)

This gives

v=0λαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)< . Which implies that: limvλαv(1λαv)g(avΨvav)=0. By (C2), getting:

(15)
limvg(avΨvav)=0.AndlimvavΨvav=0

Now,

avqv=qv+ωv(qvqv1)qv=ωvqvqv1

Taking the sum over v for the above inequality and by (5), getting: v=0avqv=v=0ωvqvqv1< . Which implies that:

(16)
limavqvv=0

Since Ψ is TAN- mapping, getting:

(17)
qvΨvqv=qvav+avΨvav+ΨvavΨvqvqvav+avΨvav+ΨvavΨvqvqvav+avΨvav+avqv+μv(avqv)+κv2qvav+avΨvav+ζv

Continuity of (15) and (16) in (17) implies to:

(18)
limvqvΨvqv=0

On the other hand,

avpv=av(av+ρbv+1)=ρbv+1ρ(1ρavΨvav+σvbvavΨvav+ρσvM1)

By (15) and (C1), getting:

(19)
limvavpv=0
qv+1Ψvqv+1λαvavΨvav+ρσvM1+(1λαv)avpv+ζv

It follows from (15), (19), and (C1) that:

(20)
limvqv+1Ψvqv+1=0

By (18) and (20), getting:

(21)
limvqvΨqv=0

For (4) the reflexivity of X makes each bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence.23 Applying this fact, {qv} has a subsequence {qvk} such that qvkz , therefore, from (21), getting limkqvkΨqvk=0 and consequently by Lemma 2, Ψz=z . Hence, ωc(qv)Fix(Ψ) . For (5) to establish that the sequence {qv} converges weakly to a fixed point of Ψ , it is enough to demonstrate that ωc(qv) consists of a single element. For this purpose, using Lemma 1 and by Definition 7, let z1,z2ωc(qv) and consider subsequences {qvi} and {qvj} of {qv} such that.

qviz1 and qvjz2 .Then for z1z2 we have:

limvqvz1<limiqviz2=limjqvjz2<limjqvjz1=limvqvz1

This leads to a contradiction, which proves that ωc(qv) is a singleton. Hence, the proof is complete.

Strong convergence

Theorem 2.

Let the assumptions of Theorem 1 hold and suppose that Ψ is semi-compact, then the sequence {qv} in (7) converges strongly to a point in Fix(Ψ) .

Proof.

Semi-compactness of Ψ and using steps (2-3) of the proof of Theorem 1, in addition to the facts that the sequence {qv} is bounded and limvqvΨqv=0 , leads to the existence of a subsequence {qvk} of {qv} with qvkz as k. Consequently, qvkz and thus zωc(qv)Fix(Ψ). Moreover, by proof of Theorem 1- step 2, limvqvz exists, then limvqvz=limkqvkz=0 . Hence, qvzFix(Ψ) .

Corollary 1.

In hypotheses of Theorem 1, suppose Ψ:XX be a nonexpansive mapping with F ix(Ψ) . Then the sequence {qv} is defined by (7) with λ(0,1],ρ>0 and initial value b0=1ρ(Ψa0a0) , satisfied qv zFix(Ψ) , and the following condition hold:

(C1)v=0σv< ,

(C2)limvinfλαv(1λαv)>0 ,

(C3){Ψavav} is bounded.

Corollary 2.

Let X be a real Hilbert space and Ψ:XX be (TAN-mapping) or a nonexpansive mapping with Fix(Ψ) . Then the sequence qv zFix(Ψ) where (0,1],ρ>0,b0=1ρ(Ψ1a0a0) , and the following conditions hold:

(C1)v=0σv<

(C2)limvinfλαv(1λαv)>0

(C3){Ψvavav} is bounded.

Remark 3.

Theorem 1 covers the wider class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, so it provides an extension of Theorem 3.1 of Dong et al., see,20 under the real uniformly convex Banach spaces, which generalize the real Hilbert spaces.

Stability

In this part, discuss the stability of a sequence defined by (7) for a fixed point of TAN-mapping where f(Ψ,rv)=λαvav+(1λαv)pv.

Theorem 3.

Let CX be a closed convex set and Ψ:CC be a TAN-mapping. Suppose that the sequence {rv}v=1 as in (7), λ(0,1] and ρ>0 . If Assumption 1 holds and {Ψvavav} is bounded, then {rv}v=1 is stable provided that b1=1ρ(Ψ1a0a0) , with v=0σv< and limvinfλαv(1λαv)>0 .

Proof.

Let {rv}v=1 be a sequence in C defined by (7) such that rv+1=f(Ψ,rv) converging to a unique fixed point z (by Theorem 1).

Set εv=rv+1f(Ψ,rv) Now to prove that limvεv=0limvrv=z

Let limvεv=0. Then, getting:

rv+1zrv+1f(Ψ,rv)+f(Ψ,rv)z=εv+rv+1z

By Theorem 1, getting:

rv+1zrvz+σvM3

Since 0<M3<1,v=0σv< and limvεv=0, and by using Lemma 3, this gives limvrvz=0 . Hence, limvrv=z.

Conversely, let limvrv=z . Then getting:

εv=rv+1f(Ψ,rv)rv+1z+f(Ψ,rv)zrv+1z+rvz+σvM3

Continuity of this implies to limvεv=0. Hence, {rv}v=1 is stable.

Now, recall HR-iteration24 which defined by

(22)
ρv=(1δv)dv+δvΨ(dv)wv=Ψ((1tv)ρv+tvΨ(ρv))uv=Ψ(Ψ(wv))dv+1=(1ϱv)uv+ϱvΨ(uv)v1,whereδv,tv,ϱv(0,1)andv=0δv=v=0tv=v=0ϱv=

Theorem 4:

Let CX be a closed convex and let Ψ:CC be a TAN-mapping. If {qv}v=1 is generated by (7), where λ(0,1],ρ>0 . Then {qv} converges faster than {dv} in (22) to the fixed point of Ψ .

Proof:

Recalling inequality (13), we get

qv+1zλαvqvz+ωvλαv(qvqv1)+(1λαv)qvz+(1λαv)σvM2qv+1zqvz+c1

Where c1=ωvλαv(qvqv1)+(1λαv)σvM2

Now, to proof {dv} converges to zFix(Ψ)

dv+1zuvz+ϱvμv(uvz)+ϱvκvuvzwvz+μv(wvz)+2κv+μv(Ψwvz)wvzρvz+tvμv(ρvz)+tvκv+κv+μv[(1tv)ρv+tvΨρv]ρvzdvz+δvμv(dvz)+δvκv

Then

uvzdvz+δvμv(dvz)+δvκv+tvμv(wvz)+tvκv+3κv+μv[(1tv)ρv+tvΨρv]+μv(Ψwvz)dv+1zdvz+μv[δv(dvz)++tv(ρvz)+[(1tv)ρv+tvΨρv]+(Ψwvz)+(wvz)+ϱv(uvz)]+κv[ϱv+δv+tv+3]dvz+c2

Where c2=+μv[δv(dvz)++tv(ρvz)+[(1tv)ρv+tvΨρv]+(Ψwvz)+(wvz)+ϱv(uvz)]+κv[ϱv+δv+tv+3]

limvqv+1zdv+1zlimvqvz+c1dvz+c20asv

Then the sequence {qv} converges faster than {dv} to the fixed point of Ψ .

Numerical example

Example 1.

Consider X=R and let Ψv:RR be TAN-mapping defined for each vN,qR by Ψv(q)=12q+14sin(vq) with initial values and parameters for {qv}, q0=1.5,q1=1.3,b0=0,ρ=1,λ=0.8,wv=0,4,αv=0.8,σv=0,05 . The initial values and parameters for {dv} , d0=1.5,δv=tv=ϱv=0.3 where z=1.0 , the obtained numerical outcomes are presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.

Let AU-iteration {sv} be sequences generated by the following iteration processes25:

(23)
wv=Ψ((1av)sv+avΨ(sv))hv=Ψ(wv)uv=Ψ(hv)sv+1=Ψ(uv)
with av[0,1] .

Table 1. Convergence difference between two iteration processes in banach space.

n qv (first iteration) qvz dv (second iteration) dvz
0 1.50.51.50.5
1 1.30.300000000000000000.41319152449575800.5868084755042420
2 1.08491894206872000.08491894206871620.34217170216623200.6578282978337680
3 0.8942528649097530.105747135090247000.46544790639479900.5345520936052010
4 0.72264110519160900.277358894808391000.473850528045516000.5261494719544850
5 0.57666622114717100.423333778852829000.425008642051775000.5749913579482250
6 0.46817809360165500.53182190639834500.37901952079234100.6209804792076590
7 0.39610585038745100.60389414961254900.339792497588305000.6602075024116950
8 0.348349678848565000.6516503211514350.307513321080032000.6924866789199680
9 0.3127848392843550.68721516071564500.28100960619886300.7189903938011380
10 0.283511419535411000.71648858046458900.25886499951404800.7411350004859530
11 0.236484611961674000.76351538803832600.239880917741487000.7601190822585130
12 0.22218635064064700.7778136493593530.223228471482028000.7767715285179720
13 0.206681317162331000.79331868283766900.208580026385551000.7914199736144490
14 0.19348297215771700.80651702784228300.196119581725497000.8038804182745030
15 0.182163235347347000.81783676465265300.186262692853136000.8137373071468640
16 0.171906524414102000.82809347558589800.177799393547688000.8222006064523120
17 0.162955888043576000.83704411195642400.152184215149363000.8478157848506370
18 0.154696935555098000.84530306444490200.13683894309989900.8631610569001010
19 0.147490778736278000.85250922126372200.187497192481177000.8125028075188230
20 0.140600018066570000.85939998193343000.00173376065612741000.9982662393438730
21 0.13482514251420600.8651748574857940-0.083138283560674901.0831382835606700
22 0.128701489091001000.87129851090899900.245238376739642000.7547616232603580
23 0.124536488944019000.87546351105598100.0099422173471926900.9900577826528070
24 0.117903970576809000.8820960294231910.098652815971529400.9013471840284710
25 0.117422420332993000.88257757966700700.136246640182145000.8637533598178550
26 0.104650313287074000.8953496867129260-0.1387604186213491.138760418621350
27 0.120463588600494000.8795364113995060-0.131143418919676001.131143418919680
28 0.069262303161731500.93073769683826900.257807779650806000.742192220349194
29 0.12603009545816000.8739699045418400-0.083211062954474801.083211062954480
30 0.038630884769703100.961369115230297-0.29073466227039901.2907346622704000
719a1ba5-9eab-45b8-aa6e-c1647fff66f6_figure1.gif

Figure 1. A graphical comparison of (7) and (22).

Theorem 5.

Let CX be a closed convex and let Ψ:CC be a TAN-mapping with Fix(Ψ) . Let {qv} be defined by (7) and {sv} be defined by (23)

Under the above assumptions, the following are equivalent for q0=s0C :

  • 1. {qv} converges to zFix(Ψ)

  • 2. {sv} converges to zFix(Ψ)

Proof.

Since initial points q1,q0,s0C and all operations are convex combinations or bounded perturbations, it follows that all sequences remain bounded in the closed convex subset C . Similar, as all coefficients are in [0,1], boundedness holds for {qv},{sv},{ρv},{bv},{wv},{hv},{uv} . By Theorem 1 {qv} convergence to z. In ordered to prove {sv} convergence to z

sv+1zuvz+μv(uvz)+kv(1av)svz+avsvz+avμv(svz)+avkv+μv((1av)sv+avΨ(sv)z)+kvsv+1zsvz+avμv(svz)+avkv+μv((1av)sv+avΨ(sv)z)+kv+μv(wvz)+kv+μv(hvz)+kv+μv(uvz)+kvsvz+μv[av(svz)+(wvz)+(hvz)+((1av)sv+avΨ(sv)z)+(uvz)]+kv(av+4)

By Lemma 3 {sv} convergence to z . Now, define Dv=qvsv , to show limvDv=0 .

Since both sequences converge to the same fixed point z , we can use: qv+1sv+1qv+1z+sv+1z0 . Therefore limvqvsv=0 .

Application

In this section, the TAN-mapping is applied to nonlinear Volterra integral equation over two dimensions, which is:

X(ξ,ρ)=β(ξ,ρ)+0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,h))dldh+ζ0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dh+γ0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,r))dl
where ,ρ, l,h[0,1],XC[0,1]×C[0,1],β:[0,1]×[0,1]R2 , j:[0,1]×[0,1]×R2R2 is continuous, j=1,2,3 and X=C[0,1] with qs=maxσ[0,1]|q(σ)s(σ)|, for all q,sC[0,1]
Theorem 6.

Suppose that Z is a closed convex subset of X and Ψ:ZZ define as

(24)
ΨX(ξ,ρ)=β(ξ,ρ)+0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,h))dldh+ζ0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dh+γ0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))dl

Assumptions

  • 1) The function X:X×XR2 is continuous.

  • 2) There exist constants v1,v2,v3>0 and sequences ηv,εv0withηv0,εv0 , such that for all w1,w2R2 ,

    1(l,h,w1)1(l,h,w2)(1+ηv)v1w1w1+εv2(ρ,h,w1)2(ρ,h,w2)(1+ηv)v2w1w1+εv3(ξ,l,w1)3(ξ,l,w2)(1+ηv)v3w1w1+εv

Then 2D Volterra integral equation has a solution in Z×Z provided that Ψ has a fixed point.

  • 3) For ζ,γ0,v1+ζv2+γv3L,L(0,1)

Proof.

Let X,XX, then

XΨX=|X(ξ,ρ)(σ)X(ξ,ρ)(σ)|σ[0,1]max=maxσ[0,1]|X(ξ,ρ)(σ)β(ξ,ρ)0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,u))dldhζ0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dhγ0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))dl|maxσ[0,1]{|X(ξ,ρ)(σ)β(ξ,ρ)0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,h))dldhζ0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dhγ0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))dl|+|0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,h))dldh0ξ0ρ1(l,h,X(l,h))dldh|+ζ|0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dh0ξ2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))dh|+γ|0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))dl0ρ3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))dl|}

Then by hypothesis 2

XΨXβXX+(1+ηv)(v1+ζv2+γv3)XX+(1+ζ+γ)εv=[β+(1+ηv)(v1+ζv2+γv3)]XX+(1+ζ+γ)εv

Let (t)=t,μv=ηv(v1+ζv2+γv3),kv=(1+ζ+γ)εv and by hypothesis 3.

Then XΨX=XX+μv(XX)+kv is a TAN-mapping.

Under all previous hypotheses in this section and Theorem 1, the iterative scheme generated by (7) converges weakly to a solution of the integral Equation (24).

Applying Theorem 6, in the following example.

Example 2.

Consider the equation as a special case of Equation 24

(25)
X(ξ,ρ)=cos(πξρ)10+0ξ0ρ116cosX(lh)dldh+120ξ124cosX(ξh)dh+120ρ123cosX(ρl)dl

where, β(ξ,ρ)=cos(πξρ)10 , 1(l,h,X(l,h))=116cosX(lh) , 2(ρ,h,X(ξ,h))=124cosX(ξh) , 3(ξ,l,X(ρ,l))=123cosX(ρl) , ζ=12 and γ=12 .

Since all the assumptions of Theorem 6 hold. Then the Equation (25) has a solution.

Conclusion

This paper presented the convergence of the modified algorithm (7) in space X as discussed throughout the paper. The outputs summarize the proof of weak convergence (Theorem 1) and strong convergence (Theorem 2) by adding some appropriate hypotheses to the space and the structure of the iterative algorithm. Note that, Algorithm 7 is equivalent to Algorithm 23, meaning they converge to the same fixed point, with the 7 convergences being faster. These results are supported by an example and a plot of the convergence processes using MATLAB. To demonstrate the importance of the work, the results were applied to solving an integral equation. For future work related to this area, see Algorithms in26 and.27

Ethical clearance

The project was approved by the local ethical committee at the University of Baghdad.

Data availability

No data associated with this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Fadhil R and Salman S. Fixed-point Acceleration Algorithm of Total Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:1430 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172972.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 22 Dec 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.