Keywords
Banach Spaces, Iterative Schemes, Total Asymptotically Non-Expansive Mappings, Fixed Points, Strong Convergence, Weak Convergence, Stability.
This article is included in the Fallujah Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation gateway.
The fixed-point iteration method is a powerful tool in analysis and its extensions in other branches. It provides a unified structure for proving existence and uniqueness results for various nonlinear problems. This study, conducted within the scope of a real Banach space enriched by uniform convexity, presents an accelerated four-step iterative scheme designed to approximate elements of the fixed-point set corresponding to a mapping called a total asymptotically nonexpansive (briefly, TAN) mapping. The results of weak and strong convergence for the proposed method are established. The results relating to weak convergence require Opial’s condition of the normed space, while the results relating to strong convergence require the addition of the semi-compactness assumption of the mapping under consideration to the previous assumptions. Additionally, numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the algorithm’s effectiveness and compare it with previously established approaches. These findings extend and refine several recent contributions available in the literature. Lastly, the work includes an application to 2- dimensional equations.
Banach Spaces, Iterative Schemes, Total Asymptotically Non-Expansive Mappings, Fixed Points, Strong Convergence, Weak Convergence, Stability.
In Banach spaces, fixed-point theory has evolved through a series of extensions of contractive-type mappings. One of the earliest key contributions was made by Browder (1965) and Kirk (1965) in,1,2 who initiated the study of nonexpansive mappings and established essential fixed-point results in uniformly convex Banach spaces. This was extended later by Goebel and Kirk (1972) in,3 who introduced asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, there by widening the scope of fixed-point theory by considering operators whose iterates approach the nonexpansive property in an asymptotic sense. Building on these developments, Alber, Chidume, and Zegeye (2005) in4 proposed the class of totally asymptotically nonexpansive TAN-mappings. A mapping is defined as TAN-mapping if nonnegative real sequences where , together with a strictly increasing continuous function satisfying such that for all .
This generalization incorporates both nonexpansive and asymptotically nonexpansive mappings as particular cases. Since its introduction, the concept of TAN-mapping has primarily been explored through iterative schemes in Banach spaces. Among the earliest adaptations were the classical Mann and Ishikawa iterations, later followed by the Halpern iteration in uniformly convex Banach spaces.10 More recently, Abed and Abed (2022) in5 investigated the Fibonacci–Halpern iteration for monotone TAN-mappings in partially ordered Banach spaces, establishing its stability and showing faster convergence compared with Mann and Halpern iterations. In 2023, Salman and Abed24 proposed a five-step iterative scheme for (λ,ρ)-firmly nonexpansive multivalued mappings in modular spaces, demonstrating that these satisfy both the (UUC1) property and the Δ2-condition. Khomphungson and Nammanee (2024) further analyzed modified Mann–Ishikawa algorithms, proving strong convergence under Condition (A) in uniformly convex Banach spaces. Moreover, Balooee and Al-Homidan (2024) in4,7 developed hybrid resolvent-based methods that connect fixed-point problems of TAN-mappings with generalized variational-like inclusions, ensuring the existence of a common element belonging simultaneously to the solution set of such problems and to the fixed-point set of a TAN-mapping. These formulations are closely related to integral and differential equations, which are frequently reformulated as operator inclusions within Banach spaces. Moreover, recent studies have enriched and broadened the theoretical perspective. For instance, Galisu et al. (2024)8 introduced enriched asymptotically nonexpansive mappings with center zero in a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space, there by providing a broader framework that incorporates TAN-mappings. Similarly, Sun (2025)9 extended the theory to random asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in uniformly convex modules, emphasizing stochastic extensions still tied to Banach-type structures. In summary, as reported in,1,2 the research direction has progressed from nonexpansive mappings3 to asymptotically nonexpansive mappings, culminating in the more general class of TAN-mappings.4 A wide variety of iterative schemes such as Mann, Ishikawa, Halpern, Fibonacci-Halpern, modified Mann-Ishikawa, and hybrid resolvent-based algorithms have played a crucial role in establishing convergence, stability, and practical applications. More recent findings in5,6 reaffirm the central significance of TAN-mappings in contemporary fixed-point theory within Banach spaces, particularly in relation to stability outcomes and their applications to variational inclusions and integral-differential models.
The primary objective of this work is to examine the convergence and stability characteristics of an inertial accelerated iterative scheme within the framework of TAN-mappings in Banach spaces. Building upon the inertial accelerated approach proposed by Harbau et al. (2022),10 we establish and prove weak and strong convergence results for the introduced process and further confirm its stability when subjected to perturbations. Moreover, a comparative study with two alternative iterative methods is conducted, demonstrating that the inertial accelerated scheme attains faster convergence. Finally, the obtained convergence results are applied to integral equations, highlighting both the practical importance and the applicability of the theoretical outcomes.
This part includes requirements for definitions, lemmas, and facts for proving the main results.
11 If is a Banach space named uniformly convex if for any holds, for all with , and .
10 Note that every Hilbert space satisfies Definition (1)
Symbols
i) denotes the real Banach Space.
ii) denotes the dual of a space .
iii) ⇀ is used for weak convergence, while ⟶ is used for strong convergence.
iv) The set of - cluster limits of a sequence is represents.
v) in , all fixed points of .
10 Let be a duality pairing on . A mapping defined as and be a gauge function is a generalized duality mapping.
Note, if for all then is a normalized duality mapping and can be expressed as .
12 A mapping is called weakly sequentially continuous if, for all sequences in with , it follows that .
13 A mapping Ψ:
(1) Demi-closed at , if in C such that and , then .
(2) Semi-compact if , for any bounded sequence then a subsequence and
Suppose a fixed-point iteration scheme is defined by a general form
14 Let be an arbitrary sequence in and fix for . Then is -stable (or stable) with respect to if and only if.
15 Suppose and are two sequences converging to the same fixed point with and for all . If the sequence and and additionally then is said to converge to faster than .
16 A space has Opial’s condition if for all with satisfied and .
23 A set is convex if for any in and .
The Lemma below is known as Opial’s property.
17 If a duality mapping is weakly continuous on , and a sequence with , then for any
Moreover, if is uniformly convex, equality occurs ⬄ .
18 Suppose is a real uniformly convex Banach space and is a closed convex. If TAN-mapping, then ( ) is demiclosed at zero, whenever is a sequence in such that .
19 Assume and are nonnegative sequences such that , and then
20 A Banach space is uniformly convex if and only if there exists a continuous, strictly increasing function with such that: , holds for all and a fixed number .
22 A Banach space is uniformly convex and , which is constant. Let sequence in such that , satisfy for some Then , where
This section is devoted to presenting results concerning weak and strong convergence, stability, and comparative analysis, as well as an illustrative example and application. Below, will be a Banach space with uniformly convexity.
The following Assumptions appeared in21
(i) Choose sequences and with which means
(ii) Let given, for the terms and for each choose , such that . For any define
From the given Assumption, it directly follows that for every the relation.
Which together with and , holds
Let satisfy Opial’s property and TAN-mapping associated with the sequences and a strictly increasing continuous function such that and . Define the sequence as: let.
is bounded.
If Assumption (i) holds, and , then .
The outlines of the proof are the following steps:
For (1), the condition ( ) implies so such that , for every . Put as follows:
Then, by (C3), the hold. Assume that for some , then:
For (2), from the scheme (7), this is obtained by:
By (8), (9), and for any getting:
Let
By Remark 2, getting that the sequence converges, then such that for every .
Now, using (10), (12), and for some any getting:
Hence, from Lemma 5 and (C1), it follows that exists. As a result, the sequence is bounded.
For (3) the above step follows that is bounded, and thus is bounded as well. Define and by condition (13), Lemma 4, and hypothesis C1, getting.
Since the exists for any , then by applying (5) and (11), such that
Because the exists for any z , the sequence is bounded; hence, such that for all . Then
This gives
. Which implies that: By (C2), getting:
Taking the sum over for the above inequality and by (5), getting: . Which implies that:
Since is TAN- mapping, getting:
Continuity of (15) and (16) in (17) implies to:
It follows from (15), (19), and (C1) that:
For (4) the reflexivity of makes each bounded sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence.23 Applying this fact, has a subsequence such that , therefore, from (21), getting and consequently by Lemma 2, . Hence, . For (5) to establish that the sequence converges weakly to a fixed point of , it is enough to demonstrate that consists of a single element. For this purpose, using Lemma 1 and by Definition 7, let and consider subsequences and of such that.
This leads to a contradiction, which proves that is a singleton. Hence, the proof is complete.
Let the assumptions of Theorem 1 hold and suppose that is semi-compact, then the sequence in (7) converges strongly to a point in .
Semi-compactness of and using steps (2-3) of the proof of Theorem 1, in addition to the facts that the sequence is bounded and , leads to the existence of a subsequence of with as Consequently, and thus Moreover, by proof of Theorem 1- step 2, exists, then . Hence, .
In hypotheses of Theorem 1, suppose be a nonexpansive mapping with F . Then the sequence is defined by (7) with and initial value , satisfied , and the following condition hold:
,
,
is bounded.
Let be a real Hilbert space and be (TAN-mapping) or a nonexpansive mapping with . Then the sequence where , and the following conditions hold:
is bounded.
In this part, discuss the stability of a sequence defined by (7) for a fixed point of TAN-mapping where
Let be a closed convex set and be a TAN-mapping. Suppose that the sequence as in (7), and . If Assumption 1 holds and is bounded, then is stable provided that , with and .
Let be a sequence in defined by (7) such that converging to a unique fixed point (by Theorem 1).
Set Now to prove that
By Theorem 1, getting:
Since and and by using Lemma 3, this gives . Hence,
Conversely, let . Then getting:
Continuity of this implies to Hence, is stable.
Now, recall HR-iteration24 which defined by
Let be a closed convex and let be a TAN-mapping. If is generated by (7), where . Then converges faster than in (22) to the fixed point of .
Consider and let be TAN-mapping defined for each by with initial values and parameters for . The initial values and parameters for , where , the obtained numerical outcomes are presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1.
Let AU-iteration be sequences generated by the following iteration processes25:
Let be a closed convex and let be a TAN-mapping with . Let be defined by (7) and be defined by (23)
Under the above assumptions, the following are equivalent for :
Since initial points and all operations are convex combinations or bounded perturbations, it follows that all sequences remain bounded in the closed convex subset . Similar, as all coefficients are in [0,1], boundedness holds for . By Theorem 1 convergence to z. In ordered to prove convergence to
By Lemma 3 convergence to . Now, define , to show .
Since both sequences converge to the same fixed point , we can use: . Therefore .
In this section, the TAN-mapping is applied to nonlinear Volterra integral equation over two dimensions, which is:
Suppose that is a closed convex subset of and define as
Assumptions
Then 2D Volterra integral equation has a solution in provided that has a fixed point.
Let and by hypothesis 3.
Then is a TAN-mapping.
Under all previous hypotheses in this section and Theorem 1, the iterative scheme generated by (7) converges weakly to a solution of the integral Equation (24).
Applying Theorem 6, in the following example.
Consider the equation as a special case of Equation 24
where, , , , , and .
Since all the assumptions of Theorem 6 hold. Then the Equation (25) has a solution.
This paper presented the convergence of the modified algorithm (7) in space as discussed throughout the paper. The outputs summarize the proof of weak convergence (Theorem 1) and strong convergence (Theorem 2) by adding some appropriate hypotheses to the space and the structure of the iterative algorithm. Note that, Algorithm 7 is equivalent to Algorithm 23, meaning they converge to the same fixed point, with the 7 convergences being faster. These results are supported by an example and a plot of the convergence processes using MATLAB. To demonstrate the importance of the work, the results were applied to solving an integral equation. For future work related to this area, see Algorithms in26 and.27
The project was approved by the local ethical committee at the University of Baghdad.
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| F1000Research | - | - |
|
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)