ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol

Occupational therapy interventions to facilitate co-occupation among infants and parents or caregivers: A scoping review protocol

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 26 Mar 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Parenting a preterm infant is highly challenging, considering the need to care for the infant in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The parents or caregivers spend approximately 22.3 hours per day in the NICU caring for the infant through involvement in various activities not limited to feeding, medication administration, and Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC). These activities simultaneously involve the infant and the parent or caregiver, termed co-occupation. These co-occupation activities benefit the infants and parent dyads.

The study aims to identify the existing literature that discusses occupational therapy interventions that promote or support co-occupation among infants and parents or caregivers. The scoping review will use the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, adhering to PRISMA for scoping review guidelines. The Person- Environment -Occupation (PEO) Model will also be used to report the results. The study will include searches across multiple databases and reference lists of relevant articles.

The findings from this study may identify the gaps in occupational therapy practice in NICU from the perspective of co-occupations and the associated interventions provided. Further, these insights may help future studies explore strategies to enhance co-occupation, improving the outcomes for infants and parents or caregivers.

Keywords

Co-occupation, infants, parents, occupational therapy, protocol

Introduction

The implicit involvement of two or more individuals in an occupation in which the occupational participants influence each other is termed co-occupation (Boop et al., 2020). Infant care is considered as co-occupation since caring for an infant requires participation from the infant and the mother, father, partner, or any other family member (WHO Recommendations for Care of the Preterm or Low-Birth-Weight Infant, 2022). However, Nugent concluded that co-occupation was chosen to address the caregiving tasks that a mother performs with her infant in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), considering the explicit demand and caregiving process they share (Nugent, 2015). This demands interaction between mother and child through which they learn about each other and provide a sense of satisfaction and maternal competence (Nugent, 2015).

Prematurity is one of the significant reasons for an infant and parent to be admitted under a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), along with other co-morbidities such as respiratory distress, sepsis, low birth weight, and asphyxia. A parent’s average time in NICU with their child varies across countries, with the lowest reported being 3.3 hours per day and the highest being 22.3 hours per day (Pineda et al., 2018). The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated the prevalence of 13.4 million preterm livebirths, with the highest preterm birth in Southern Asia (13.2%), with India having the highest number of preterm births in 2020 (over 20% of all preterm births worldwide) ( WHO Recommendations for Care of the Preterm or Low-Birth-Weight Infant, 2022).

As per the new recommendations of WHO, family involvement in routine care of the preterm infant is suggested through bedside care, including feeding, kangaroo mother care (KMC), and medication administration, with an emphasis on neonate’s better short-term outcomes (Pineda et al., 2018; WHO Recommendations for Care of the Preterm or Low-Birth-Weight Infant, 2022). A study published in 2015 states parental care as a co-occupation process since there is a dyad between the parent’s and the child’s occupations (Dalvand et al., 2015), which is bathing, feeding, diaper changing, comforting and soothing, parent-infant bonding and engaging with the infant through play (Cardin, 2020). This clearly states that co-occupation only exists with the foundation of parent role acquisition, which is severely impaired in the NICU environment (Cardin, 2020).

Co-occupation exists from birth, and the intensity of co-occupation varies as the child ages, with the most involvement occurring in infancy, which can positively or negatively impact the parent (Aubuchon-Endsley et al., 2021). In a study conducted in 2014, the authors established a clear association between preterm births and NICU admission to increased anxiety and depression, which affects family functioning more than parents of term infants, which extends beyond NICU and duration of hospital admission (Treyvaud et al., 2014) where infancy is defined as a period from birth to 2 years (Infant Care and Infant Health|NICHD - Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2021).

Some of the benefits of co-occupations highlighted through various studies include enhanced confidence and competence in the new role as a parent along with less parental role alteration, which extends beyond NICU to homes and community, especially if the child becomes dependent on the parent due to disability (Harris et al., 2018; Price & Stephenson, 2009). Considering these benefits for the parents and children, occupational therapists are recommended to promote, support, and facilitate the process of involvement in co-occupation within the dyad, helping in developing autonomy and independence in infant care activities (Fraga et al., 2019; Vergara et al., 2006). This occupation-centered practice encourages family-centered care through which the family is placed at the center of the decision-making process throughout assessments and interventions that support co-occupation (Discenza, 2009; Richter et al., 2023).

Knowing the existing interventions that facilitate co-occupation that improve the quality of life and role participation will add to the literature base for the delivery of the early intervention. The study aims to find occupational therapy interventions that facilitate co-occupation among infants, parents, and/or caregivers participation and environmental strategies that support meaningful participation in co-occupation.

Method

The study will be carried out using the framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005) to report the data and the Person- Environment- Occupation (PEO) Model (Law et al., 1996) to organize the findings. The study will follow the PRISM for Scoping review to report the findings.

The scoping review would consist of the following stages:

  • 1. Identifying the research question

  • 2. Study identification

  • 3. Study selection

  • 4. Charting the data

  • 5. Collating, summarizing and reporting the results

Stage 1: Identifying the research question

The question leading the review is: What occupational therapy interventions facilitate co-occupation among infants and parents? By exploring this question, we will identify the possible interventions and strategies that facilitate co-occupations that infants and/or parents initiate as individuals and as dyads, various co-occupations, and strategies that focus on the environment in which co-occupation occurs.

Stage 2: Study identification

The search will be conducted using Scopus, CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Web Of Science, and Embase. The study uses the PICO (population-intervention - context - outcome) format, as listed in Table 1, to identify the concepts.

Table 1. PICO Framework for study selection.

Criteria Determinants
PopulationBirth to 2-year-old infants
InterventionOccupational therapy intervention
ContextNICU or at home
OutcomeParticipation in co-occupation

This is followed by identifying the keywords ( Table 2). Each keyword will be combined using Boolean operators (AND and OR) to create a search string. Truncations appropriate for the selected database will be used while searching.

Table 2. Keywords for each concept.

ConceptKeywords
Occupational therapy interventions“occupational therapy intervention*” OR “occupational therapy treatment*” OR “occupational therapy” OR “occupational therapy strategies” OR “Pediatrics occupational therapy “OR “early childhood therapy”
Co-occupation “co-occupation*” OR “feeding” OR “breastfeeding” OR “co-sleeping” OR “Sleeping” OR “changing diaper” OR “Social interaction” OR “bonding”
Population“infant” OR “infants” OR “baby” OR “babies” OR “newborn” OR “neonate” OR “parent” OR “caregiver” OR “mother” OR “father”
Context“neonatal intensive care unit” OR “home” OR “mother side”

Additionally, we will search through the reference list of the identified articles to attain the saturation point for the research question we aim to explore through this study. This will also ensure that we include relevant articles which discuss topics of similar interest.

Stage 3: Study selection

A preliminary search will be conducted using broad searches in each database. The studies will be included for title screening after applying the limiters to language and publication type. The results of this initial search will be title-screened, followed by abstract and full-text screening. The inclusion and exclusion criteria ( Table 3) will be considered throughout the screening process.

Table 3. Study inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria

  • Studies with infants, parents and/or caregivers

  • Studies with parents with or without psychological difficulties or mental illness

  • Full-text articles in English

  • Letter to the editors, opinion papers, newspaper articles and conference proceedings

The screening process will be carried out independently by two reviewers. Inputs from an arbitrary reviewer or a subject expert will be sought if there is any difference in opinion or ambiguities in selecting any article for the study. The articles selected for full-text screening will be downloaded from respective journals through the university library portal. Those articles that are not accessible will be retrieved through a librarian or personal contacts or existing networks.

The articles included in full-text screening will be added to a reference manager (Mendeley), followed by data extraction.

Stage 4: Charting the data

Data from the studies included after full-text screening following the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be organized under the following headings: title, authors, journal, year, country, sample population and setting, the aim of the study, methodology, interventions, and comparison (if any); duration, and important results ( Table 4).

Table 4. Sample data extraction sheet.

Sl. noTitle, authors, journal, year, countrySample population and settingAim of the studyMethodologyInterventions and comparison (if any); durationImportant results

This will be pretested to ensure the relevant information is captured, and necessary changes will be made after piloting the data extraction sheet. Any ambiguity will be discussed with the arbitrary reviewer or a subject expert, and appropriate action will be taken to ensure the quality of the review.

Stage 5: Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results

PRISMA for scoping review will be used to report the screening process, the reasons for exclusion and the number of duplicates removed. Summary tables will be used to portray the vital elements of the selected studies, which are listed in the data extraction sheet. The data will be discussed using thematic descriptive analysis. The gaps and limitations of the studies retrieved will also be recorded.

Study status

The authors are performing a data search in the mentioned database using the search string created for respective databases.

Discussion

From this study, we will identify the interventions targeting co-occupation among infants and parents or caregivers. The study will also give comprehensive data on the various strategies used in NICU and at home, along with environmental effects or modifications used to facilitate meaningful participation in each of the co-occupations among the dyads.

Strengths and limitations of the study

  • 1. This is the first scoping review exploring the interventions to facilitate co-occupation among infants and parent or caregiver dyad.

  • 2. Articles included in the study will be from Scopus-indexed journals to maintain the quality of the studies that will be retrieved.

  • 3. The study design limits the appraisal of articles that are selected for data extraction through screening. This might give a chance to personal bias from the authors.

Ethics and dissemination

The study does not require ethical approval or consent since the study design for the review includes articles published in public domains that do not involve human participants. The results of this study are intended to be published in peer-reviewed journals to disseminate the findings.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 26 Mar 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
V P H, Gautam K and M Georlee G. Occupational therapy interventions to facilitate co-occupation among infants and parents or caregivers: A scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:332 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160091.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 26 Mar 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.