ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report

Case Report: Management of Terminal Myelocystocele in a Neonate: A Case Report and Review of Clinical Considerations

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Terminal myelocystocele (TMC) is a rare, skin-covered congenital spinal anomaly characterized by turbulent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, an elongated caudal spinal cord, terminal cystic dilation, and an intact dura mater. TMC is frequently associated with other congenital abnormalities affecting the anorectal, genitourinary, and vertebral systems, which necessitates careful clinical and radiological differentiation from other skin-covered spinal dysraphisms. We report a case of a two-week-old male neonate, born to a 19-year old primigravida mother, who presented with a large swelling in the lower back. Prenatal anatomical ultrasound at 20 weeks’ gestation had revealed sacrococcygeal anomalies.

Postnatal spinal MRI demonstrated a well-defined, multi-lobulated sacrococcygeal cystic lesion with internal septations originating from an anterior sacral defect. Based on the imaging findings, differential diagnoses included a pure cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma and TMC. Surgical excision of the lesion was undertaken through two inverted V-shaped incisions along the caudal region. Following 8-months outpatient follow up, the infant did not demonstrate any neurological impairments. The potential for cyst expansion in TMC represents a significant clinical consideration, as it may indicate rapid neurological decline. Caregivers should be informed of this risk and advised to seek immediate medical attention if cyst enlargement is observed.

Keywords

Myelocystocele, Spina bifida, Saccrocoygeal teratoma, cerebrospinal fluid

Introduction

Congenital anomalies are significant contributors to both morbidity and mortality in children. The effects of these anomalies extend beyond the individual, placing a burden on healthcare systems and families. Congenital central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, specifically neural tube defects (NTDs), are classified as either open or closed NTDs based on the presence or absence of exposed neural tissue.1 Skin-covered terminal myelocystoceles (TMC) represent a clinical entity characterized by turbulent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, an associated caudally elongated spinal cord, terminal cystic dilation of the dorsal spine, and an intact dura mater.2,3 Several malformations have been associated with TMC, affecting the anorectal region, genitourinary system, and vertebrae.4

Skin-covered malformations encompass a wide range of spinal dysraphism entities, such as spinal cord meningoceles or lipomas, making clinical and radiological differentiation between these conditions crucial for choosing appropriate management approach and avoiding associated neurological sequelae, such as incontinence and motor weakness.4,5 In this case report, we describe our experience managing a neonate presenting with TMC. An informed consent was taken from the patient guardian. To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous reported TMC cases in Saudi Arabia.

Case report

A two-week-old male neonate, born to a 19-year-old primigravida, para 1 mother, was referred to the neurosurgery department for evaluation of a giant swelling in the lower back. The neonate was born full term via spontaneous vaginal delivery, which was uneventful. There was no significant medical or surgical history, except for the mother’s hypothyroidism, for which she was not on regular treatment. No infections were noted during the gestational period, and neither parent has a history of diabetes mellitus.

A prenatal anatomical ultrasound screening at 20 weeks revealed sacrococcygeal anomalies. At birth, the neonate cried spontaneously, with an APGAR score of 8 at both 1 and 5 minutes. The neonate weighed 2745 grams, measured 54 cm in length, and had a head circumference of 33 cm. There was no noted CSF leak.

On examination, the neonate was active and alert. A subcutaneous light bluish cystic swelling was noted in the midline of the lower lumbosacral region ( Figure 1). The swelling size was observed to increase during crying, and the transillumination test was positive. The head circumference and spine curvature were normal; the plantar reflex was positive, and tone changes were unremarkable. The anterior fontanelle was open and flat, and no other associated abnormalities were noted.

4283cb06-34f3-4996-855a-7ad4496b83d3_figure1.gif

Figure 1. (A, B): A subcutaneous, light bluish cystic mass is observed in the midline of the lower lumbosacral area, measuring approximately 3.4 × 6.6 × 7.2 cm.

The edema results in considerable occlusion of the intergluteal cleft and presents as smooth and fluctuant upon examination and palpation. The lesion exhibits no discernible hard material, and its bluish coloration indicates a delicate covering skin potentially concealing a fluid accumulation beneath. The adjacent skin is intact, exhibiting no symptoms of erythema or inflammation, and there is an absence of discharge or ulcers.

Several vertebrae demonstrated spina bifida on plain radiographs. MRI of the spine revealed a well-defined sacrococcygeal exophytic multilobulated cystic lesion ( Figure 2). Based on these findings, our preliminary diagnosis was either a pure cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma or a TMC.

4283cb06-34f3-4996-855a-7ad4496b83d3_figure2.gif

Figure 2. (A, B): A clearly delineated sacrococcygeal exophytic, multilobulated, exclusively cystic mass with internal septations is observed.

The lesion arises from an anterior sacral defect, exhibiting herniation of the meningeal sac through the sacral foramen. It spreads into the pelvic cavity and measures approximately 3.4 × 6.6 x 7.2 cm (anterior-posterior x transverse x craniocaudal dimension). A bulk effect is observed on the rectum and left ureter. No indication of adipose tissue, calcification, or soft tissue component is observed.

Surgical excision was performed through two inverted V-shaped incisions along the caudal region of the mass. The dura mater was exposed along the edges of the swelling through lateral skin dissection. The meningocele sac was found to continue terminally with the spinal subarachnoid space, and the inner thin-walled sac was found to terminate in the spinal canal. Both were opened and drained. The dura mater was primarily reconstructed, followed by multilayered skin closure ( Figure 3).

4283cb06-34f3-4996-855a-7ad4496b83d3_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Surgical exploration.

A. Exposing the inner lining of the sac following the incision of the skin and cystic wall, with subsequent fluid drainage. B. Detaching and removing the sac, including its adherent attachment to the coccyx. C. Removing the coccyx along with the sac, resulting in exposure of the posterior rectal wall.

Postoperatively, the patient was nursed prone for a week. Intravenous antibiotics were administered for one week. Sutures were removed two weeks after discharge. After 8 months of outpatient follow-up, the baby remained free of neurological impairments.

Discussion

Myelocystocele is an uncommon closed NTD characterised by the herniation of the enlarged spinal cord central canal through a posterior spinal defect.6,7 In contrast to teratomas, which comprise tumours of all germ layers, myelocystoceles are non-neoplastic entities. They contrast with myelomeningocele, in which the spinal cord and meninges protrude without the development of a genuine central canal dilatation.6

Myelocystoceles has an incidence of approximately 4 to 5 per 10,000 live births, accounting for a portion of the estimated 140,000 NTDs that occur globally each year with.8,9 These may present as bowel and bladder problems, tethered cord syndrome, and orthopaedic anomalies such as, scoliosis. The condition is frequently associated with additional congenital anomalies such as, the OEIS complex (omphalocele, bladder exstrophy, imperforate anus, and sacral agenesis).

Neurological manifestations are contingent upon the degree of spinal involvement.9 Myelocystocele entails the atypical closure of the neural tube during embryonic development, generally occurring between days 22 and 28 of gestation. Deficiencies in the folding or fusing processes result in anomalies in the spine or skull. Environmental variables, such as maternal folate insufficiency, and genetic abnormalities are associated with the disruption of neural tube development.10 An antenatal ultrasound usually shows a cystic tumour across the lower spine. A “cyst within a cyst” look, with a thin-walled cyst inside a bigger cyst, is characteristic. Anechoic masses with thin walls rarely have solid tissue, calcification, or intrapelvic extension. The foetal head often reveals a normal posterior fossa without Chiari II malformation (e.g., no ventriculomegaly or “banana sign”). The OEIS complex can cause myelocystoceles and spinal dysraphism.7

Diagnosis is typically made shortly after birth by physical examination. While some neonates present with normal neurological findings, many exhibits clinical signs such as, cystic mass during physical examination or upon detailed urological or electrophysiological assessment at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, surgical intervention such as, excision of the cyst, repair of the spinal defect, de-tethering of the spinal cord is recommended even for asymptomatic individuals.11

In our instance, plain radiographs revealed spina bifida in several vertebrae. An identifiable sacrococcygeal exophytic multilobulated cystic lesion with internal septations was observed on the spine's MRI. Our first diagnosis was either a TMC or a purely cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma.

Two inverted V-shaped incisions were performed in the caudal region of the mass to facilitate surgical removal. A key clinical consideration in the management of TMC is the potential for cyst expansion, which serves as an indicator of rapid neurological decline. For example, the development of foot deformities within a two-month period reflects how quickly deterioration can occur. This progression is believed to result from the cyst’s expansion, which may cause direct stretching of the spinal cord and adjacent neural tissues dorsally. Therefore, caregivers should be informed about the risk of cyst enlargement and advised to seek immediate medical attention if such growth is observed.12

Conclusion

Myelocystocele is an uncommon yet critical neural tube condition that requires prompt identification, comprehensive diagnostic assessment, and appropriate treatment to avert enduring neurological and functional consequences. Surgical intervention, encompassing cyst excision, spinal defect correction, and spinal cord de-tethering, is fundamental to reduce the danger of fast neurological deterioration. Holistic treatment approaches, encompassing rehabilitation and familial education, are essential for enhancing functional results and quality of life for impacted persons.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s guardian (Parents) for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Saleh Alrasheed A, Mansour Almaqboul T, Mohammad Alabdali M et al. Case Report: Management of Terminal Myelocystocele in a Neonate: A Case Report and Review of Clinical Considerations [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:457 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.163099.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 24 Apr 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.