Home Browse A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Tourists’ Accommodation Preferences
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
▬
✚
Study Protocol

A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Tourists’ Accommodation Preferences

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Ninad Sudhir Chavan
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-1632
1, Senthilkumaran Piramanayagam
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-0421
1, Naresh Nayak Perampalli
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-8315
2, Harini KN
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7079-5991
3, Anand P Ambali4
Ninad Sudhir Chavan
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-1632
1, Senthilkumaran Piramanayagam
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-0421
1, [...] Naresh Nayak Perampalli
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2137-8315
2, Harini KN
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7079-5991
3, Anand P Ambali4
PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background

The global demographic shift to an ageing population has placed individuals aged 60 and above as a crucial tourism market segment due to several factors. The senior tourism market, a growing segment, has distinct preferences and needs. Motivation for tourism, tourism-related needs, concerns for accessibility, travel companions, and past experiences determine the preferences of senior tourists. Comprehending these preferences is vital for the tourism industry to cater to this market segment effectively and sustainably. While researchers have extensively examined preferences, there is a lack of research on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences. This scoping review aims to map research trends and provide a future research scope on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences.

Methods

The updated Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines were adopted for this scoping review protocol. The proposed scoping review will be aligned with the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework, to develop the research questions, and the Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology (TCCM) framework for synthesising, summarising and reporting. Studies indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases published in English from their origin to 2025, irrespective of study location are included. The articles will be screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility. The extracted data will be presented graphically and descriptively.

Discussion

This scoping review maps the existing literature on senior tourists’ accommodation choices by adopting the TCCM framework. This study will provide future research directions associated with senior tourists’ accommodation preferences.

Registration

This scoping review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B64TM

Ethics and Dissemination

There is no direct involvement of human participants in this study on secondary data; therefore, ethical clearance is not required. The results of this review will be disseminated through journal publications and conference presentations in the future.

Keywords

Accommodation Preferences, Senior Tourism, Senior Tourists, Travel Preferences

Corresponding author: Senthilkumaran Piramanayagam
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
Copyright:  © 2025 Chavan NS et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Chavan NS, Piramanayagam S, Perampalli NN et al. A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Tourists’ Accommodation Preferences [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:852 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169592.1) First published: 02 Sep 2025, 14:852 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169592.1) Latest published: 02 Sep 2025, 14:852 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169592.1)

Introduction

A significant shift towards an older population has been observed in the global demographics. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that, globally, the older population (aged 60 years and above) is projected to double—reaching approximately 2.1 billion by 2050—compared to one billion in 2020. The current growth in the older population is much faster than in the past.1 Considering the present growth rate, the United Nations (UN) estimates that the population aged 65 years and above will surpass the population under 18 in the 2070s.2 However, ageing comes with an increased risk of geriatric syndromes, malnutrition, disability, and poor health, resulting in a reduced quality of life and placing an enormous medical and healthcare burden on society. Beyond health-related risks, the elderly population faces ageism—defined as “the stereotypes (how we think), prejudice (how we feel), and discrimination (how we act) directed towards people on the basis of their age”.3 Ageism, which is ubiquitous worldwide, raises challenges of age-related discrimination, violence, stigma, abuse, isolation, and exclusion. Such circumstances prevent older adults from fully participating in society and exercising their basic human rights, thereby deteriorating their health and well-being.3

To address the range of negative consequences associated with demographic changes in the elderly population and foster the sustainable development of society, the UN announced 2021–2030 as the ‘UN Decade of Healthy Ageing’, focusing on age-friendly environments, tackling ageism, and guaranteeing inclusive and sustainable growth.4 This initiative aligns with the second guiding principle of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, ‘Leave No One Behind’, which encourages inclusivity and equity among all age groups.5 Travel is considered a potential avenue for healthy ageing, improved health, well-being, and quality of life. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has reinforced the value of travel in public health beyond its economic significance. Specifically, travel is regarded as a non-pharmacological intervention for health and well-being among people of all ages, genders, health statuses, family situations, and economic conditions.6,7 The travel industry can potentially drive shared prosperity by advancing policies, frameworks, and governance, as well as by utilising tourism income to achieve sustainable development goals.8

As the world’s second-largest industry, tourism is responsible for promoting healthy ageing by actively engaging with the older population.3 A Eurostat report on tourism trends and ageing indicates that senior tourism accounted for nearly one in four tourism nights in 2022, highlighting the high level of tourism participation among the elderly.3,9 However, the COVID-19 pandemic had a devastating impact on tourism, particularly senior tourism.5 On a positive note, a recent report by the World Tourism Organization10 estimates that the tourism sector has nearly returned to pre-pandemic levels of international arrivals, contributing approximately USD 3.4 trillion to the global gross domestic product (GDP). Globally, the senior travel market is valued at USD 1.72 trillion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 2.62 trillion by 2030, underscoring the need for tourism stakeholders to explore the opportunities associated with this market.11 Given the growing number of seniors, this segment is likely to become one of the most significant segments within tourism in the coming decades.12

The literature clearly indicates a growing interest in ageing, tourism, and the physical, mental, and social well-being of the elderly population.13,14 While senior tourism is becoming an important driver of tourism economic growth, scholars have pointed out the limited academic focus on the topic.15,16 Among the many decisions involved in senior travel, the choice of accommodation is considered a key determinant of their experience and significantly influences satisfaction. However, there is a notable research gap in senior tourists’ accommodation preferences.17,18 Furthermore, although some reviews have been published on senior tourism, travel motivation, and the influence of ageing, there is a scarcity of scoping reviews on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences.13,14,19,20 Understanding senior tourists’ accommodation choice attributes is essential for meeting their unique needs and designing services that cater to this market segment. This will contribute to both economic and social development, particularly in relation to seniors.17 As the senior tourism segment continues to evolve rapidly, a scoping review is needed to provide a synthesised map of existing evidence on accommodation attribute preferences, research trends, theories and methodologies adopted, research gaps, and future directions. This study aims to identify the literature on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences and explore the relevant theories, contexts, characteristics, and methods to present an organised overview of the research.

Method

Protocol

According to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) article on methodology for scoping review protocols21 and the five-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley,22 this study will be conducted with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).23 The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extensions for protocol (PRISMA-P) checklist, consisting of 17 items, was referred to and registered on the open-access repository Figshare.24,25 This protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF)26 to communicate with the research community about the proposed scoping review. A Theory, Context, Characteristics, Methodology (TCCM) framework will be adopted to summarise and report the synthesised data.27

  • 1. Identifying the research question

Following the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework, research questions were developed ( Table 1) and addressed in the scoping review, ensuring broader coverage of the relevant literature.

  • 1) What are the global trends in research on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences?

  • 2) What is the current state of research on senior tourists’ accommodation choices in terms of theories used, context studied (geographical and cultural settings), characteristics, and methodologies employed?

  • 3) What are the future research scopes for senior tourists’ accommodation preferences?

  • 2. Identifying relevant studies

Table 1. PCC* framework for developing a research question.

Population Senior tourists aged 60 years and above
Concept Senior tourists towards accommodation preferences
Context No restrictions on the location and timeline of the study

* PCC: Population, Concept, Context.

The selection of related studies will be done using the PCC mnemonic to establish the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review.

Population

This review will consider studies related to senior tourists. Studies should include participants aged 60 years and above. The minimum age criterion of 60 years is set, as mentioned by the WHO. Studies comparing senior tourists with other age cohorts will also be included.

Concept

Considering the increased population of older adults, the tourism industry considers senior tourists an important travel market segment. Research on the senior tourist segment is growing in the current scenario. During tours and travel, senior tourists demonstrate different motivations, preferences, technology adoption, and concerns for accessibility, health, and safety than other age cohorts.17,20 Thus, any research relating to seniors and focusing on the hospitality and tourism industry is of interest. Additionally, studies on the accommodation preferences of senior tourists will be included.

Context

Studies published until August 2025 will be included in this review. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the trends in senior tourist research, this review purposefully considers studies published from its origin. There will be no limit on the geographical location considered in the study for inclusion in the review to maintain the broader scope of the review. Although the published research article domain should be among social sciences and humanities, it should not include other areas such as agriculture, medicine and engineering.

Types of evidence sources

This study will include peer-reviewed articles which can be qualitative, quantitative, mixed-method, or interventional in nature to ensure the rigor of the research and its findings. However, it does not consider book chapters, conference papers and reports.

Search strategy

Articles will be searched in two major databases, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The suitable terms mentioned in Table 2 for the search string of senior people, tourists, and the hospitality industry will be included, which were developed by consulting subject matter experts and professors. A broad study range was considered because no review has been conducted on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences to date. Search filters for language, document type, and research areas/domains will be applied.

  • 3. Study selection

Table 2. Search terms.

Older peopleAged, older adults, elderly, seniors, older people, older tourists, geriatric, older population, aging population, senior tourists, senior citizens, older citizen
TouristsHotel guests, tourists, tourists, customers, consumers
Hospitality industryHospitality, travel industry, tourism, hotel industry, lodging, accommodation sector, hotel, lodging industry

Using the search string, the document list will be exported from both databases and uploaded to Rayyan software for deduplication and title-abstract screening. The screening will include two stages: title-abstract and full-text screening of each article, where two reviewers will assess the articles based on the specified criteria set according to the research objectives. Conflicts between reviewers will be resolved by discussing the article and review criteria together; a third reviewer will assist in cases of further ambiguity. A PRISMA flowchart will be created to elaborate on the number of articles searched, included, and excluded during the process.28

  • 4. Charting the data

The final included articles will be processed to retrieve information that will be compiled into a dataset. The data will be extracted and organised in Microsoft Excel to visualise details about the research problem, design, key findings, and implications. The format of the data extraction sheet is mentioned in Table 3, which will assist in reporting the data.

  • 5. Collating, summarising and reporting the results

Table 3. Data extraction sheet.

NumberItem Description
1Title of the paperWhat is the title of the article?
2JournalIn which journal the article is published?
3YearWhen did the article got published?
4AuthorsWho all are the authors of the paper?
5Problem addressedWhat issue is focused upon to resolve?
6Research designWhat is the research method used?
7Country of the studyWhich country the study is performed in?
8Age definitionWhat is the age criteria set in sampling/study?
9Theory usedWhat existing theories are used/developed?
10FindingsWhat are the major outcomes/results of the study?
11LimitationWhat are the limits/drawbacks of the study?
12Future scopeWhat are future recommendations given in the study?
13Theoretical implicationWhat theoretical benefits are obtained from study?
14Managerial implicationWhat managerial/practical benefits are obtained from study?

Once the data extraction is complete, the collated data will be synthesised and summarised by visualisation and descriptive methods using the TCCM framework. Both quantitative and qualitative studies will be summarised descriptively and thematically.

We will focus on the first research question by identifying trends and themes of the selected articles and grouping them to understand existing research on senior tourists’ preferences. Additionally, to address further research questions and inform future recommendations, this study highlights unexplored gaps and key research areas, providing a foundation of existing knowledge and identifying opportunities for future studies on senior tourists’ accommodation preferences.

Dissemination

We plan to disseminate the scoping review findings in peer-reviewed journals for publication and conference presentations.

Study status

To date, we have completed the initial phase of conceptualising the idea and forming research questions, along with the search strategy and inclusion criteria. We formed a search string by running a pilot search in databases, and will proceed with the search, followed by deduplication and screening of the published articles.

Discussion

A scoping review is the best approach for mapping and synthesising broader evidence and gaps across multiple disciplines.21 To the best of our knowledge, no scoping review has been conducted in the field of senior tourism. Thus, we are conducting the first scoping review to portray the research trends and scope of senior tourists’ accommodation preferences. The proposed TCCM framework helps to structure the review systematically across four key dimensions: theories used, context studied, characteristics/variables examined, and methodologies adopted. We hope that this scoping review will provide insights into seniors’ accommodation preferences, considering their changing needs, and provide better services to the senior travel market segment. A thorough literature search will be conducted from its origin to the present to accurately trace research development and coverage in this area. This study will not consider the quality assessment of the articles, as it is not a mandatory criterion for conducting a scoping review; however, it will be counterbalanced by considering only peer-reviewed articles published in journals. This protocol provides a clear and transparent outline for conducting scoping reviews in this or any other relevant field. Articles published in English can be expected to be one of the limitations of this study; some studies may have important data that are available in different languages.

Ethical considerations

This scoping review involves a study on secondary data, that is, existing published articles, and does not involve any human participants directly.

Data availability

Underlying data

There are no underlying data linked to this article.

Extended data

OSF: A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Tourists’ Accommodation Preferences, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B64TM.26

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: ‘PRISMA-P’ checklist. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29898464.25

Study data can be accessed according to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY 4.0).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Manipal Academy of Higher Education for providing access to the databases and administrative support and respective service providers of Microsoft Office, Rayyan, Figshare and Mendeley for use of their software.

References

  • 1.  WHO: Ageing and health. World Health Organization; Accessed: Nov. 12, 2024. Reference Source
  • 2.  United Nations: World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. New York: 2024. Reference Source
  • 3.  Hu F, Wen J, Phau I, et al.: The role of tourism in healthy aging: An interdisciplinary literature review and conceptual model. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. Sep. 2023; 56: 356–366. Publisher Full Text
  • 4.  WHO: The UN Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021-2030 in a Climate-changing World.Jan. 2022. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2024. Reference Source
  • 5.  United Nations: World Social Report 2023: Leaving No One Behind in an Ageing World. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA); 2023. Publisher Full Text
  • 6.  Zheng D, Wen J, Kozak M, et al.: Vulnerable populations with psychological disorders in tourism: Methodological challenges and recommended solutions for empirical research. Tour. Manag. 2023; 98(July 2022): 104760. Publisher Full Text
  • 7.  Wen J, Zheng D, Hu F: The emerging concept of travel therapy in health science: Will it be applied to tourists visiting sub-frigid climate zones? Frigid Zo. Med. 2022; 2(4): 200–203. Publisher Full Text
  • 8.   Tourism - A Driver for Shared Prosperity. World Tourism Organization; 2025. Publisher Full Text
  • 9.  Eurostat: Tourism Trends and Ageing. European Union; Accessed: Aug. 16, 2025. Reference Source
  • 10.   International Tourism Highlights. World Tourism Organization; 2024th ed. 2024. Publisher Full Text
  • 11.  Grand View Research: Silver Tourism Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type, By Age Group, By Category (Solo, Couple, Group), By Destination, By Booking Mode, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2025-2030.2025. Reference Source
  • 12.  Campolo MG, Giannetto C, Lanfranchi M, et al.: Navigating Time: A Comparative Analysis of Senior Tourists’ Intentions and Length of Stay in Italy Pre-, during, and Post-COVID-19. Sustainability. 2024; 16(3). Publisher Full Text
  • 13.  Fan Y, Goh E, Isa SM, et al.: 30 Years of Healthy Ageing Research in Tourism and Hospitality: Research Trends and Implications for Future Research. Serv. Ind. J. 2024; 1(38): 1–38. Publisher Full Text
  • 14.  Zheng Z, Hafizuddin-Syah BAM, Omar Zaki H, et al.: Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2024; 48(6). Publisher Full Text
  • 15.  Fan DXF, Buhalis D, Fragkaki E, et al.: Achieving Senior Tourists’ Active Aging Through Value Co–creation: A Customer-Dominant Logic Perspective. J. Travel Res. 2023; 64(2): 427–443. Publisher Full Text
  • 16.  Chang L, Moyle BD, Dupre K, et al.: Progress in research on seniors’ well-being in tourism: A systematic review. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022; 44(101040): 101040. Publisher Full Text
  • 17.  Nicolau JL, Rodríguez-Sánchez C, Ruiz-Moreno F: A motivation-based study to explain accommodation choice of senior tourists: Hotel or Airbnb. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. Oct. 2024; 123: 103911. Publisher Full Text
  • 18.  Prentice C, Dominique-Ferreira S, Ferreira A, et al.: The role of memorable experience and emotional intelligence in senior customer loyalty to geriatric hotels. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. Jan. 2022; 64. Publisher Full Text
  • 19.  Bulut C, Nazli M: Senior Millionaires and their Travel Behaviours: the Case of Turkey. J. Popul. Ageing. Sep. 2023; 16(3): 721–740. Publisher Full Text
  • 20.  Otoo FE, Kim S: Analysis of studies on the travel motivations of senior tourists from 1980 to 2017: progress and future directions. Routledge; Feb. 16, 2020. Publisher Full Text
  • 21.  Peters MDJ, et al.: Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid. Synth. 2022; 20(4): 953–968. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 22.  Arksey H, O’Malley L: Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract. 2005; 8(1): 19–32. Publisher Full Text
  • 23.  Tricco AC, et al.: PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018; 169(7): 467–473. Publisher Full Text
  • 24.  Shamseer L, et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; vol. 350(January): p. 25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  • 25.  Chavan NS, Piramanayagam S, Nayak N, et al.: PRISMA-P Checklist. Figshare. 2025. Publisher Full Text
  • 26.  Chavan NS, Piramanayagam S, Nayak N, et al.: A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Travellers’ Accommodation Preferences. Open Science Framework. 2025. Publisher Full Text
  • 27.  Paul J, Khatri P, Duggal HK: Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? J. Decis. Syst. 2024; 33(4): 537–550. Publisher Full Text
  • 28.  Page MJ, et al.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Article Versions (1)
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
 - -
Citations
SEE MORE DETAILS
CITE
how to cite this article
Chavan NS, Piramanayagam S, Perampalli NN et al. A Scoping Review Protocol on Senior Tourists’ Accommodation Preferences [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:852 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169592.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 02 Sep 2025
Comment

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Comments on this article

All Comments(0)

Add a comment
Sign up for content alerts

Browse by related subjects

    Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
    Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
    Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
    Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
    Sign In
    If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

    The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
    Email address not valid, please try again

    You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

    You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

    To sign in, please click here.

    If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

    Code not correct, please try again
    Email us for further assistance.
    Server error, please try again.