ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Efficacy of preoperative anesthetic safety checklist for simulated emergency caesarean section in multipurpose operation theatre setup in a developing country: An observational study

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency caesarean sections are challenging life-threatening scenarios that involve multidisciplinary teams to ensure favorable outcomes. Most operation theatres (OT), especially in developing countries, tend to be shared with multiple surgical departments. Emergency caesarean section in such setups require preparation of the theatre with drugs and extra equipment in a short period of time, The goals of resuscitation in obstetric emergencies remain like any other medical emergencies with the distinction of focussing on the resuscitation and safety or ensuring minimum adversities to two lives. Stress, time constraints and human errors in a high-risk scenario are liable to lead to oversights and missed “critical” steps in ensuring “safe” pre-anaesthesia setup. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated anaesthesia safety checklist in reducing missed critical steps in pre-anaesthesia setup in simulated settings.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology of a tertiary care center after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, and the study was registered with CTRI (057174). A curated anaesthesia safety checklist on pre-anaesthesia setup for class 1 emergency caesarean section was designed and validated by senior anaesthetists. The checklist was categorized into mandatory and desirable presence in the operating theatre. 25 anaesthesia residents selected at random in simulated settings and after obtaining informed consent from them, were asked to prepare the OT for an emergency caesarean section with and without the checklist. The incidence of missed steps was also assessed. The chi-squared test was used to assess statistical significance.

Results

Use of checklist showed significant improvements in the compliance to “mandatory” aspects of OT preparedness in technical aspects as well as presence of a critical drugs. “Desirable” attributes also showed significant improvements in the compliance.

Conclusions

The use of validated checklists as guides in simulated learning scenarios reduces the incidence of missing critical aspects of OT preparedness for emergency caesarean sections.

Keywords

Checklist, simulated learning, pre-anesthesia set up, emergency caesarean section, OT preparation, clinical skill training

Strength and limitations of the study

  • Adherence to the protocol was good.

  • The same set of participants was used for the control and case groups, thereby reducing the confounding factors.

  • Operation theatre requirements may vary from center to center, limiting the generalization of our checklist.

Introduction

“Primum non Nocera” or “non-maleficence,” i.e., “Do no harm” is the core and non-negotiable ideal of the sacred Hippocratic oath.1 The science and art of medicine have been founded, advanced, and are still evolving to enhance patient safety.1,2 Patient safety involves the prevention of errors in healthcare administration, which could result in temporary or long-standing adverse outcomes.1,3

Specialties such as anaesthesia are at heightened risk of lapses in patient safety protocols.4 Operation theatres, especially in developing countries, are shared by multiple departments. The preparation of operations in such settings is performed by postgraduates in anaesthesia departments, along with operation technologists. Dysfunction, delayed judgement, or oversight of even minute aspects by even a single individual of the team can expose the patient to an incompressible risk, and reports are replete with incidences of “wholly preventable surgical adverse events” or “never events” including morality, permanent, or temporary injuries.5

Identifying the pressing need for measures to decrease the risk of “never events” to surgical patients, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed guidelines and designed a WHO surgical checklist to reduce the rate of major surgical complications.1,2,5,6 “Checklists” are defined as “organisational aids” in efficient implementation of complex multistep tasks.7 Checklist enables breakdown of a complex procedure into simple task steps and provides rules/ prompts on the key aspects of each steps including what is required, from where or whom it should be procured and leads on how a particular task/procedure needs to be performed stepwise.79 The Anaesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) states that anaesthesia-related incidents are often caused by “temporary and atypical lapses in the vigilance of otherwise competent anaesthetists” and the adoption of checklists for critical stages of anaesthesia might drastically reduce the incidence of such lapses.1 The use of checklists in anaesthesia aids beginners to perform practical anaesthesia procedures efficiently and safely and to feel effectively supported by reducing errors due to oversight, stress, fatigue or monotony.7

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated anaesthesia safety checklist in reducing the frequency of missed steps in the pre-anaesthesia setup of patients undergoing simulated emergency caesarean sections. This study also aimed to measure the comfort level of anaesthesia residents using a checklist.

Materials and methods

The present study is a single-center prospective cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country between 2022-2023, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (560/2022) on 1st April 2023 and registering the study with CTRI (057174). Based on the average incidence of 11.5% missed steps (Tscholl et al.),10 the estimated sample size for assessing the efficacy of checklist use on pre-preparation was found to be 49.

Consent: written informed consent was taken from the participants prior to commencement of study.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of the research.

Preparation and validation of the checklist: A curated anaesthesia safety checklist on the pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section was prepared via the Delphi method. The checklist consisted of drugs and equipment that were considered mandatory and desirable as per the norms of the study site. A curated anaesthesia safety checklist on the pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section was prepared using the Delphi method ( Table 1). The checklist was categorized into “equipment” and “Drugs” classified as “Mandatory Presence in the Operation Theatre” and “Desirable Presence in the Operation Theatre” Desirable Presence in the Operation Theater. The equipment’s classified as “mandatory” included functioning operation table, machine check and presence of functioning standard ASA monitors, presence of wedge inside the operation theatre, spinal kit, presence of pressure bag, appropriate size laryngoscope blades and endotracheal tube tubes, presence of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airway and availability of difficult airway cart in the vicinity. The mandatory” drugs included adrenaline, ephedrine, atropine, glycopyrrolate, phenylephrine, oxytocin, tranexamic acid, carboprost, methergine, ondansetron, succinylcholine, and an adequate number of propofol ampules and ketamine vials. Availability of body warmer, fluid warmer, syringe infusion pumps, colloids, noradrenaline ampules, carbetocin were categorized under “desirable to have” while. The checklist was validated by senior professionals in the field of anaesthesia. The checklist was validated and approved by three senior anaesthetists prior to its use in the simulation study. The Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) was used to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire.

Table 1. Checklist.

Yes/No
Mandatory requirements
1Functioning Operation Table
2Machine Check and presence of functioning standard ASA monitors
3Presence of Wedge inside the Operation theatre
4Arrangement of Spinal Kit
5Availability of Difficult Airway Cart in the vicinity
6Presence of Pressure Bag
7Appropriate size Laryngoscope blades and endotracheal tube tubes
8Presence of Nasopharyngeal Airway
9Presence of Oropharyngeal Airway
10Availability of Blood Forms inside the OT
Mandatory drugs
1Adrenaline
2Ephedrine
3Atropine
4Glycopyrrolate
5Phenylephrine
6Oxytocin
7Tranexamic acid
8Carboprost
9Methergine
10Ondansetron
11Succinylcholine
12Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants
Desirable attributes
1Availability of Body Warmer
2Availability of Fluid Warmer
3Availability of Syringe Infusion Pumps
4Availability of Colloids
5Availability of Noradrenaline Ampules
6Availability of Carbetocin

Participants: This study recruited 25 anaesthesia postgraduates by random selection. A simulation was conducted in which postgraduates were warned of an impending emergency caesarean section and were given five minutes to prepare the operating room for it. The participants were asked to prepare the OT on two separate occasions, randomly assigned with or without a checklist 3weeks apart. The same set of postgraduates was used for both the control and checklist groups on different days so that the same standard was set. The sample size of 25 individuals, tested under two conditions (without and with a checklist), ensured a total of 50 data points (25 for each condition), which aligned with the calculated required sample size of 49.

Outcome assessment: Outcome was assessed in terms of the incidence of missed steps with and without a checklist. The benefits of using a checklist, if any, and the comfort levels of the anaesthetist with a checklist were assessed.

Statistical analysis: The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were employed to assess the association between factors associated with preparing the operation theatre for the procedure with and without a checklist. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0.

Results

The efficacy of the validated checklist was assessed among 25 randomly postgraduates selected. The postgraduates were prompted to prepare the OT twice, randomly assigned once with the checklist and once without the checklist, thus obtaining a total of 50 responses. There were six first-year, nine second-year, and ten third-year postgraduates ( Figure 1).

ad9cf029-8a56-4f3b-9423-6653cec68888_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Pie Chart showing the number of participants as per year of residency.

It was observed that of cumulative 550 mandatory attributes, 87 was missed without checklist.

When considering desirable attributes, 108 “desirable” attributes out of 150 were missed by postgraduates while setting up OT in the absence of checklists.

In comparison, 12 “mandatory” and 24 “desirable” attributes were missed while preparing OT in the presence of the curated anaesthesia safety checklist; the difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.036.

Table 2 summarizes the performance of the postgraduates in fulfilling the “Mandatory” technical/infrastructural attributes of the pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section in the presence and absence of a checklist.

Table 2. Comparison of the compliance to the “Mandatory” infrastructural and technical attributes of pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section.

Checklist attributesWith checklist (n = 25)Without checklist (n = 25) p value*
Functioning Operation Table24 (96)15 (60)0.002 *
Machine Check and presence of functioning standard ASA monitors25 (100)25 (100)-
Presence of Wedge inside the Operation theatre25 (100)24 (96)1.00
Arrangement of Spinal Kit25 (100)24 (96)1.00
Availability of Difficult Airway Cart in the vicinity19 (76)9 (36)0.004
Presence of Pressure Bag25 (100)20 (80)0.050
Appropriate size Laryngoscope blades and endotracheal tube tubes25 (100)25 (100)-
Presence of Nasopharyngeal Airway23 (92)12 (48)0.001
Presence of Oropharyngeal Airway25 (100)13 (52)0.001
Availability of Blood Forms inside the OT25 (100)13 (52)0.001

* Chi-square test.

This shows that providing the validated anaesthesia safety checklist on the pre-anaesthesia setup resulted in significant improvements in compliance to ensure the presence of a functioning operation table, the availability of a difficult airway cart, the presence of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airways, and the availability of blood forms inside the OT.

Table 3 summarizes the performance of the postgraduates in ensuring the presence of “mandatory” medications required while performing a class 1 emergency caesarean section, in the presence and absence of a checklist.

Table 3. Comparison of the compliance to the “Mandatory” availability of live saving/emergency drugs in a pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section.

Mandatory drugs for a class 1 emergency caesarean sectionWith checklist (n = 25)Without checklist (n = 25) p value*
Adrenaline25 (100)25 (100)-
Ephedrine25 (100)25 (100)-
Atropine25 (100)25 (100)-
Glycopyrrolate25 (100)25 (100)-
Phenylephrine25 (100)24 (96)1.00
Oxytocin25 (100)25 (100)-
Tranexamic acid24 (96)15 (60)0.002
Carboprost25 (100)20 (80)0.050
Methergine25 (100)21 (84)0.110
Ondansetron25 (100)8 (22)0.001
Succinylcholine25 (100)18 (72)0.010
Routinely Used Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants25 (100)18 (72)0.010

* Chi-square test.

This shows that checklist-aided OT preparation resulted in significant improvements in compliance to ensure the presence of critical drugs, such as tranexamic acid, ondansetron, succinylcholine, and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, while pre-anaesthesia setup of OT for a class 1 emergency caesarean section.

Table 4 summarizes the efficacy of the checklist in enhancing the performance of postgraduates in ensuring the presence of “Desirable to have” attributes.

Table 4. Comparison of the compliance to the “Desirable To Have” attributes in a pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section.

“Desirable to Have” attributesWith checklist (n = 25)Without checklist (n = 25) p value*
Availability of Body Warmer25 (100)12 (48)<0.001
Availability of Fluid Warmer21 (84)3 (12)<0.001
Availability of Syringe Infusion Pumps22 (88)1 (4)<0.001
Availability of Colloids22 (88)11 (44)0.001
Availability of Noradrenaline Ampules23 (92)8 (32)<0.001
Availability of Carbetocin13 (52)7 (28)0.083

* Chi-square test.

The checklist resulted in significant improvements in compliance to ensure the availability of body warmer, fluid warmer, syringe infusion pumps, and noradrenaline ampules while preparing the OT.

Furthermore, all postgraduates who participated in the study reported that the checklist was easy to comprehend and comfortable to use.

Discussion

Management of obstetric emergencies, including suspected uterine rupture, eclampsia, preeclampsia, and placental abruption, is a life-threatening challenge requiring emergency caesarean sections in a high-risk setting, calling for a multidisciplinary approach.11,12 The anaesthetic management of such cases remains a challenge and greatly affects maternal and neonatal outcomes.12 The goals of resuscitation in obstetric emergencies remain similar to any other medical emergency, with the distinction of focusing on resuscitation and safety or ensuring minimum adversities to two lives.13 Anaesthesia postgraduates are beginners in this field and may find it difficult to meet the requirements of a pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section.12 The criterion-based step-wise approach in prompting to ensure a well-quipped OT in a simulated scenario aids in the clear definition of roles and the essence of a multidisciplinary approach in handling real emergencies.8,9 Checklists act as cognitive aids, aiding the preparation and evaluation of postgraduates in handling emergencies in both simulated and real-life scenarios.19 The present study focused on designing an anaesthesia safety checklist on a pre-anaesthesia setup for a class-1 emergency caesarean section using the Delphi method. The checklist included technical requirements and drugs under “Mandatory” and “Desirable” categories with respect to ensuring their availability in the OT. The designed checklist was found to be reliable (0.889), according to the Kuder-Richardson formula. This designed and validated checklist was evaluated for efficacy among anaesthesia postgraduates. The study showed significant improvements in compliance to ensure the presence of a functioning operation table, a difficult airway cart, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airways, blood forms, and critical drugs. Evaluation of the “desirable” attributes also reported significant improvements in compliance to ensuring the availability of body warmer, fluid warmer, syringe infusion pumps, and noradrenaline ampules during OT preparation. The availability of propofol ampules, ketamine vials, succinylcholine, routinely used non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, and the difficult airway cart was consistently high in the checklist group. Cumulatively, a statistically significant improvement was recorded in both “mandatory” and “desirable” attributes of postgraduates when using the checklist.

Optimal management of obstetric emergencies remains a core area of focus to address preventable maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, especially in low resource settings.14 Simulated learning and replication of emergencies through virtual reality along with assisted cognitive aides/checklists ensures greater preparedness among medical professionals to handle such emergencies.15 Identification of the benefits of such simulated criterion based learning and evaluation, resulted in the constitution of the Obstetric Anaesthesia SAFE courses and the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training (VAST) which focus on “equipping anaesthesia providers with the essential skills and knowledge to deliver safe care to their patients, even in low-resource settings” and inter-disciplinary approaches in teaching and reaffirming “peri-operative practices and non-technical skills,” respectively.1618 Recent studies have explored the efficacy of pre-validated and newly designed checklists for emergency caesarean sections, as well as other medical emergencies. Abrams et al. discussed the value of multi-professional training in obstetric anaesthesia by emphasizing how it can enhance collaboration, communication, and the use of cognitive supports.19 The study reported enhanced maternal and newborn outcomes resulting from simulation-based multi-professional training in crisis resource management principles.19 Barbara et al. performed a randomized control trial and reported that anaesthesiology residents who received concentrated instruction on a simulator performed better than those who did not during the simulated scenario.20 According to the study, simulation-based training can be an effective method for imparting rare but essential/crucial anaesthetic abilities, which corresponds to the findings in our study where the performance by the postgraduates was enhanced while using the checklist.20

Efficacy of checklist aided simulated learning in evaluation of clinical skills, debriefing, practice, and reassessment is also being explored. Another study by Gaba et al reported the use of checklist for simulated anaesthesia crises for evaluation of clinical skills, the checklist included certain “essential” items that, if missed, resulted in a failing score even if all other aspects of the simulated anaesthetic were performed perfectly, the study reported higher failed attempts in absence of checklist.21 This translates to the fact that the checklist serves as an aid in ensuring better compliance while teaching in simulated scenarios and ensuring better preparedness, increased confidence, and improved inter-professional collaboration/teamwork and communication in handling real-life medical crisis.21 Technical skills in obstetric anaesthesia, such as airway care, blood loss prediction, and epidural administration, can be taught more effectively using simulation through “exposure, practice, and reflection”.1622 Without putting patients in danger, in-situ simulation in the labor and delivery unit can assist in locating latent mistakes and system-level issues.23 With scoring systems designed to assess resident performance during simulated scenarios, simulation can be utilized to identify deficits, improve skills, and facilitate preparedness in handling real crisis.21

Limitations

The present study reports the efficacy of the checklist evaluated among 25 postgraduates of Anaesthesiology in a single tertiary center and reports significant improvement of compliance in postgraduates across their professional years when aided with the checklist. To obtain a more robust evaluation of the designed checklist, it needs to be administered to a greater number of residents and in multiple tertiary healthcare centers. The checklist was designed with respect to the OT norms of the study center, which can vary across centers, and was not included in the checklist, as it was assumed to be available in the OT premises. Supraglottic airways and video laryngoscopes were not included separately, and were assumed to be components of the difficult airway cart. Furthermore, in accordance with the study by Gaba et al., a scoring system could have been used to assess performance using a checklist. However, the goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the checklist in aiding preparation of a safe pre-anaesthesia setup for a class 1 emergency caesarean section while ensuring safe, supportive, and stress-free simulated learning environment which can promote “learning and reflection rather than fear and avoidance”.16

Conclusions

Cognitive aids in simulated learning scenarios ensure fewer oversights in missing critical aspects of emergency medical management, and facilitate better preparedness in handling real-life scenarios. The development of mandatory institutional checklists for postgraduate medical education and real-life practice facilitates better patient outcomes as well as improved technical and non-technical skill sets in clinicians pertaining to teamwork, preparedness, and confidence. Collaboration between healthcare organizations, professional societies, and policymakers can aid in developing standardized checklists for emergency caesarean sections, as well as other medical emergencies, and aid in streamlining the best practices in implementation strategies across institutions.

Ethics and consent

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital, Manipal (DHR Registration No. EC/NEW/INST/2024/KA/0509).

The approval date was 01/04/2023, valid for one year from the date of approval. The protocol number assigned to this study IEC: 560/2022. Individual informed consent specific to this study was taken and all participants gave consent for the use of their data for research purposes with strict adherence to anonymity, and in accordance with all relevant regulations and ethical standards, adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
kini p, Kona Y, Pai A and Kini P. Efficacy of preoperative anesthetic safety checklist for simulated emergency caesarean section in multipurpose operation theatre setup in a developing country: An observational study [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2025, 14:900 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.168230.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 10 Sep 2025
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.