Keywords
Antibiotic misuse, Outpatients, Tertiary Hospitals, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Factors, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH)
Antibiotic misuse remains a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in low- and middle-income countries where access to antibiotics is poorly regulated. This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and determinants of antibiotic misuse among outpatients in the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH).
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 adult outpatients selected using stratified sampling. Data were collected using a structured and pretested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 30. Descriptive statistics summarized variables, while chi-square tests assessed associations, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Although 69.5% of respondents correctly identified antibiotic misuse and 92.7% recognized its link to AMR, inappropriate practices were prevalent. Approximately 61.7% reported using antibiotics without a prescription, 53.6% discontinued treatment prematurely, and only 32.3% consistently completed prescribed courses. Misconceptions persisted, with about 40% believing antibiotics are effective against viral infections. Factors influencing misuse included prior illness experience, non-professional advice, cost, and ease of access from pharmacies.
Despite relatively high awareness, a significant gap exists between knowledge and practice. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship through patient education, stricter regulation, and improved healthcare access is essential to reduce misuse.
Antibiotic misuse, Outpatients, Tertiary Hospitals, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Factors, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH)
Antibiotics are medicines used to treat bacterial infections by killing bacteria or inhibiting their growth.1 They play an important role in treating bacterial infections, including life-threatening ones.2 However, microorganisms are becoming less susceptible to antibiotics, and by implication, infections are becoming difficult to treat due to antibiotic resistance.3
Antibiotic misuse refers to the use of antibiotics in a manner inconsistent with appropriate clinical guidance, such as self-medication, non-prescription use, inappropriate use for viral infections, incorrect dosing, premature discontinuation, sharing antibiotics, or using leftover antibiotics.4 The misuse of antibiotics has contributed to a constant surge in resistance, which is a global threat to human health.4,7 Inappropriate antibiotic use is facilitated by non-prescription dispensing through community pharmacies and medicine vendors.5 In many middle-income countries, antibiotics are available over the counter, exacerbating the problem.5,6 Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major consequence of antibiotic misuse, occurring when microbes are no longer inhibited or destroyed by antibiotics.3,8 The continuous increase in antibiotic resistance rates is alarming, threatening the therapeutic effectiveness of antibiotics.9 The misuse of antibiotics is a significant global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Nigeria.6 In outpatient departments, patients frequently self-medicate, demand antibiotics unnecessarily, or fail to adhere to prescribed treatment regimens.4,7 Factors such as lack of awareness, easy over-the-counter access to antibiotics, poor healthcare policies, the pressure on healthcare professionals to meet patient expectations, lack of funds for doctor consultations, long wait times at the hospital, high cost of laboratory tests, and unavailability of medical doctors contribute to this issue.2,5,6 Various antibiotic misuse practices lead to antimicrobial resistance, prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher morbidity and mortality rates.8,10 Addressing this issue is crucial for sustaining the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating bacterial infections.9 Given the global increase in antibiotic resistance, which is predominantly due to antibiotic misuse, this study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and factors associated with antibiotic misuse among outpatients in the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku Ozalla.
Antibiotic misuse is a growing global health threat, contributing to the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), treatment failures, and increased mortality rates. The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified AMR as one of the top public health challenges of the 21st century, warning that without urgent action, common infections may become untreatable, leading to a potential post-antibiotic era.11 Overuse and inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, particularly in outpatient settings, are major drivers of this crisis. WHO estimates that at least 50% of antibiotic use is unnecessary or improperly used, highlighting the need for stricter antibiotic stewardship programs worldwide.12 High-income countries have taken significant steps to regulate antibiotic prescriptions, yet misuse remains a concern. For instance, in the United States, despite guidelines promoting rational antibiotic use, nearly 20 to 30% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions are deemed inappropriate.13 Similarly, in the United Kingdom, studies have shown that antibiotics are often prescribed for viral infections where they offer no benefit.14 In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the situation is even more alarming due to weak regulatory frameworks, easy access to antibiotics without prescriptions, and poor public awareness.15 In India, for example, over-the-counter antibiotic sales contribute significantly to AMR, with self-medication being a prevalent practice.16 In Nigeria, antibiotic misuse is widespread in both hospital and community settings, exacerbated by poor enforcement of prescription laws and limited awareness of AMR. Studies have reported high rates of self-medication with antibiotics, driven by factors such as cost, accessibility, and inadequate healthcare services.17 In the outpatient departments of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), patterns of antibiotic misuse remain underexplored, raising concerns about irrational prescribing practices and patient self-medication habits. Understanding the extent and drivers of antibiotic misuse in this setting is crucial for designing targeted interventions to promote rational antibiotic use and curb the threat of AMR in Nigeria.
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among outpatients attending a University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) in Enugu State, Nigeria.
The study included consenting adults (≥18 years) attending outpatient clinics. Healthcare professionals and individuals unable to provide reliable responses were excluded.
A minimum sample size of 384 was determined using Cochran’s formula. Stratified sampling was employed to recruit participants across outpatient departments proportionally.
A stratified sampling technique was adopted to ensure adequate representation of outpatients from the various clinics within UNTH. Since patient characteristics and patterns of antibiotic use may vary across departments, stratification helped improve the representativeness of the sample and reduced sampling bias. Proportionate allocation was further used to ensure that the number of participants selected from each clinic reflected the estimated outpatient attendance in those departments. This enhanced the reliability and generalizability of the study findings among outpatients at UNTH.
Data were collected using a structured, pretested questionnaire assessing socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and factors influencing antibiotic use. The instrument demonstrated acceptable internal consistency.
Data were cleaned and analyzed using SPSS version 30. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges depending on distribution. Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were computed from relevant questionnaire items. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess associations between categorical variables and antibiotic misuse. Variables with p < 0.20 in bivariate analysis were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research and Ethics Clearance Committee, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, with reference number: UNTH/NHREC/2025/04/4220, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity were maintained throughout the study.
Of 400 eligible outpatients approached, 384 completed valid questionnaires, giving a response rate of 96.0%. Most participants were aged 18–45 years and predominantly female, as shown in Table 1. More than half of the respondents had at least a tertiary-level education.
Knowledge of antibiotic misuse was relatively high, with the majority correctly identifying misuse practices and recognizing their link to resistance. However, misconceptions remained, particularly regarding the use of antibiotics for viral infections (See Table 2).
As shown in Table 3, Overall, 69.8% of respondents correctly identified antibiotics as medicines used to treat bacterial infections. A minority falsely identified analgesics as antibiotics. The most common source of education on antibiotic resistance was healthcare professionals (35.2%).
Study respondents, as presented in Table 4, showed a favorable attitude towards antibiotic misuse, recognizing its potential local and global implications. 9 out of 10 participants affirm that bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance. The mean knowledge score among participants, calculated from combined responses across the antibiotic misuse, antibiotic resistance, and antibiotic knowledge domains (maximum score of 30), was 16.63 ± 1.50.
Regarding the belief that antibiotics are effective in treating viral infections such as the common cold or flu, over 30% agreed. More than half of the participants agreed that frequent antibiotic use can lead to antibiotic resistance. In response to whether respondents had ever taken antibiotics as a preventive treatment before experiencing any symptoms of an illness, 18.2% reported doing so often, 38.0% occasionally, and 40.1% never, as presented in Table 5. When asked if it is acceptable to buy or request the same antibiotics that previously worked for similar symptoms, 39.3% responded yes, 41.1% said no, and 16.4% were unsure. Lastly, 52.6% of respondents reported using leftover antibiotics from a previous illness without consulting a doctor.
A little over half of the respondents (52.6%) reported, as shown in Table 6, that they sometimes keep antibiotics at home as an emergency prescription for themselves or their children. When asked where they usually obtained antibiotics, 62.5% said they did so through a doctor’s prescription, though a similar proportion (55.7%) admitted to obtaining them from a pharmacy without a prescription. Only 32.3% of respondents said they always completed their full course even if they started feeling better. Encouragingly, 69.0% of participants expressed a definite willingness to avoid taking antibiotics unless necessary, to help prevent antibiotic resistance. An additional 19.8% said they might do so if advised by a doctor, but 3.1% still felt antibiotics should be taken whenever they felt the need.
As presented in Table 7, about two-thirds of respondents understood that antibiotics are effective only against bacterial infections and not viral illnesses. However, a notable fraction remained either misinformed or unsure. A significant proportion of participants admitted to having taken antibiotics without a prescription from a doctor at the clinic, with pharmacists being the most common source. When it came to adherence, 56% of participants said they sometimes stopped taking antibiotics before completing the full prescribed course once they felt better, and 6.5% always did so. The reuse of leftover antibiotics from a previous illness was common, with 44% admitting they sometimes did this.
Nearly a third of respondents admitted to skipping completion of an antibiotic course due to side effects, while 58.9% said they had never done so, see Table 8. When asked about the role of laboratory investigations in prescribing decisions, 42.2% said doctors only occasionally requested tests beforehand, while just below 20% said no tests were typically done. Finally, communication from pharmacists was shown to be inconsistent.
As presented in Table 9, Ampicillin and cloxacillin (Ampiclox) were the most frequently used antibiotics (50.5%), followed by metronidazole (46.1%). Pharmacists (50.8%) and doctors (47.6%) were the primary sources of consultation before antibiotic use. Most respondents (85.2%) purchased antibiotics from pharmacies, and a small proportion (11.2%) reported using herbal or traditional medicine alongside antibiotics. The leading reason for discontinuing antibiotics prematurely was feeling better (57.8). Over half occasionally self-medicate with antibiotics.
As shown in Table 10, one out of every three respondents have experienced side effects from antibiotics. Nearly half (48.7%) admitted to keeping leftover antibiotics for future use. Over-the-counter purchase of antibiotics was common, with 62.0% reporting they sometimes did this. In terms of frequency of use, 24.0% took antibiotics once every six months, while 8.9% used them more than once a month.
This study assessed knowledge, attitudes, practices, and factors influencing antibiotic misuse among outpatients at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu. Overall, the findings show that although participants had relatively good awareness of antibiotic misuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), this knowledge did not consistently translate into appropriate antibiotic use. This knowledge–practice gap reflects a broader challenge reported across many low- and middle-income countries, where easy access to antibiotics, socio-economic constraints, cultural beliefs, and weak enforcement of prescription regulations continue to promote misuse.
Most respondents demonstrated good knowledge of antibiotic misuse, with 69.5% correctly identifying misuse-related behaviours and 92.7% recognizing that misuse can contribute to antibiotic resistance. This level of awareness is higher than findings from Delta State, where only 57.8% of adults were aware of antibiotic resistance,20 and Kaduna State, where fewer than half of breastfeeding mothers had heard of antibiotic resistance.21 The higher awareness in the present study may be related to the tertiary hospital setting, where patients are more likely to interact with healthcare professionals. However, misconceptions remained common, as about 40% of respondents believed antibiotics are effective against viral infections such as colds and flu. Similar misconceptions have been reported in Malaysia,24 Southwestern Nigeria,18,19 Saudi Arabia,23 and India,25 suggesting that confusion between bacterial and viral infections remains widespread. Such beliefs may increase inappropriate patient demand for antibiotics and place pressure on healthcare providers to prescribe them unnecessarily.26 In addition, only half of the respondents had ever received information on proper antibiotic use, indicating that patient education remains inadequate even within a tertiary healthcare setting. This supports previous evidence that knowledge alone is insufficient and that continuous, structured education is needed to promote rational antibiotic use.27
Respondents’ attitudes also revealed inconsistencies between awareness and intended behaviour. More than half reported storing antibiotics for emergency use, while 52.6% admitted reusing leftover antibiotics without medical consultation. These findings are consistent with reports from Lebanon,28 Saudi Arabia,29 and India,25 where antibiotic storage and reuse are common. Although 69% of participants indicated willingness to avoid unnecessary antibiotics if advised by a doctor, 39.3% stated that they would request the same antibiotics if these had worked previously. This suggests that previous perceived effectiveness, convenience, and cost may strongly influence antibiotic-seeking behaviour despite awareness of appropriate use. Similar contradictions have been reported in Ogun State, where respondents who claimed to understand proper antibiotic use still engaged in self-medication for minor illnesses.30 Furthermore, 40% of participants admitted to reducing their antibiotic dose once symptoms improved, a practice also reported in Uganda31 and Jordan.32 Early discontinuation of antibiotics may be driven by perceived recovery, cost concerns, or fear of adverse effects, but it increases the risk of treatment failure and contributes to the survival of partially resistant organisms, thereby promoting AMR.33
Although awareness of AMR was relatively common, inappropriate antibiotic-use practices remained widespread, suggesting that knowledge alone is insufficient to change behaviour in settings where antibiotics are easily accessible without prescription. Self-medication was particularly high, with 61.7% reporting antibiotic use without a doctor’s prescription, and pharmacies were the most common source. This finding aligns with Nigerian studies reporting non-prescription antibiotic use ranging from 47% to 76%.2,34,35 The persistence of this practice reflects weak enforcement of prescription regulations and the role of pharmacies and patent medicine vendors as informal sources of treatment. Only 32.3% of respondents reported always completing their antibiotic course, which is lower than findings from India25 and closer to reports from Uganda.31 This difference may reflect variations in healthcare access, prescription control, stewardship activities, and patient counselling. Sharing and recommending antibiotics were also reported, with 25.5% of respondents sharing antibiotics and 34.1% recommending them to others. Similar practices have been documented in Kenya,36 Lebanon,28 and Nigeria,37 suggesting that social networks and communal approaches to medicine may reinforce antibiotic misuse and undermine professional medical advice.
Several structural and socio-economic factors influenced antibiotic misuse in this study. Long waiting times, high consultation and laboratory costs, and delays in test results encouraged some respondents to bypass formal healthcare services. Similar system-level barriers have been reported in Uganda38 and South Africa,39 where inefficient healthcare delivery contributed to self-treatment and empirical antibiotic use. The high rate of over-the-counter antibiotic purchase in this study further demonstrates how accessibility and convenience drive misuse. Economic pressures were also evident, as some respondents altered prescriptions to cheaper alternatives or reduced doses after feeling better. Comparable findings from Pakistan40 and China22 show that affordability strongly shapes antibiotic-use behaviour. These findings indicate that interventions should address not only awareness but also the cost and accessibility of healthcare services.
Pharmacist-patient interaction was another important area of concern. Although pharmacies were a major source of antibiotics, only 57.6% of respondents reported receiving adequate instructions from pharmacists. Similar gaps in counselling have been reported in Ogun State30 and India.25 Inadequate counselling at the point of purchase may worsen misuse, particularly when antibiotics are obtained without prescriptions. Finally, although most respondents agreed that antibiotics should require prescriptions, their practices often contradicted this belief. This disconnect suggests that improving antibiotic use will require stronger enforcement of prescription-only policies, better pharmacy regulation, continuous patient education, and broader health-system reforms that reduce the financial and logistical barriers to seeking appropriate care.
This study has several strengths that support the credibility of its findings. The use of a large, well-calculated sample size of 384 outpatients improved the statistical reliability of the results, while the inclusion of participants from different outpatient departments at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) allowed for a broader representation of patient experiences and antibiotic-use behaviours. The use of a structured and pretested questionnaire enabled a comprehensive assessment of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and factors influencing antibiotic misuse. Administering the questionnaire in both English and Igbo, as well as through self-administered and interviewer-administered formats, also improved participation across different literacy levels. In addition, the use of SPSS with descriptive and inferential statistics strengthened data analysis, while adherence to informed consent and confidentiality ensured ethical conduct.
However, the study had some limitations. Its cross-sectional design means that causal relationships could not be established. The use of self-reported data may have introduced recall bias and social desirability bias, as participants may not have accurately remembered past antibiotic-use behaviours or may have provided responses they considered acceptable. Since the study was conducted in a tertiary hospital, the findings may not be fully generalizable to patients in primary healthcare centres, rural communities, or other healthcare settings. Time and resource constraints also limited the study to a single period of data collection. Although translation was provided, some participants may still have misunderstood certain medical terms. Non-response bias may also have occurred if those who declined participation differed from those who took part.
Despite these limitations, the study provides useful evidence on antibiotic misuse among outpatients in a tertiary healthcare setting and offers a basis for future research, policy action, and antimicrobial stewardship interventions.
Although most respondents demonstrated awareness of antibiotic resistance and recognized that antibiotic misuse contributes to AMR, inappropriate antibiotic-use practices were common. Non-prescription antibiotic use, early discontinuation of treatment, storage and reuse of leftover antibiotics, and over-the-counter access from pharmacies were prominent misuse behaviours. These findings suggest a substantial knowledge-practice gap among outpatients at UNTH. Interventions should combine patient education with stronger enforcement of prescription-only antibiotic sales, improved pharmacist counselling, reduced outpatient waiting times, and hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship activities.
This study titled “Antibiotic Misuse Among Outpatients in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH)” received approval on 10/11/2025 with the approval no as Unth/nhrec/2025/04/4220, from the Research Ethics Committee of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku Ozalla, Enugu.
All the participant are above 18 years and after being told about the study, they signed a written inform consent form.
The researchers declared the availability of data associated with this study.
OSF: [Antibiotic Misuse Among Outpatients in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) /Dataset]. [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M3284].41
The project contains the following underlying data:
[Antibiotic_dataset_ Fixed] (The dataset associated with the study).
[Antibiotic_dataset_ full excel.xlsx] (The dataset associated with the study).
[Antibiotic_dataset_full pdf.pdf] (The dataset associated with the study).
OSF: [Antibiotic Misuse Among Outpatients in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH) /Dataset]. [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M3284].41
This project contains the following extended data:
Questionnaire for Antibiotics misuse. (This is the questionnaire that was utilized to collect data for the study). Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC-By Attribution 4.0 International).
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| F1000Research | - | - |
|
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)