ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

The Impact of Green Advertising and the Mediating Role of Perceived Credibility on Consumers’ Purchase of Lontar-Based Products in Indonesia

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 29 Apr 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Climate gateway.

Abstract

Background

The growing concern over environmental issues has increased interest in eco-friendly packaging as an alternative to conventional plastic. In Indonesia, packaging made from lontar leaves represents a sustainable option that is also closely related to local resources and practices. However, consumers are often reluctant to pay a higher price for environmentally friendly packaging. Understanding the factors that shape willingness to pay more is therefore important. This study examines how green advertising influences willingness to pay more for eco-friendly packaging made from lontar leaves, with perceived credibility and green future estimation as the underlying psychological mechanisms.

Methods

This study used a quantitative survey design. Data were collected from 401 consumers who were familiar with and or had used eco-friendly packaging. The relationships among green advertising, perceived credibility, green future estimation, and willingness to pay more were tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling with SmartPLS software. The analysis included both direct effects and parallel mediation effects.

Results

The results show that perceived credibility and green future estimation have significant positive effects on willingness to pay more. Green advertising does not have a significant direct effect on willingness to pay more. However, green advertising significantly influences perceived credibility and green future estimation. Both variables, in turn, significantly increase willingness to pay more. The findings indicate that perceived credibility and green future estimation fully mediate the relationship between green advertising and willingness to pay more through a parallel mediation mechanism.

Conclusions

Green advertising is more effective when it strengthens consumer trust and builds positive expectations about future environmental benefits. Clear, relevant, and credible sustainability messages are therefore important for encouraging consumers to accept premium prices for eco-friendly lontar-leaf packaging in Indonesia.

Keywords

green advertising; perceived credibility; green future estimation; willingness to pay more; palm leaf packaging

1. Introduction

Purchasing power plays a critical role in shaping sustainable consumption and can accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In developed countries, increases in purchasing power are associated with heightened consumer expectations for environmentally friendly products and services, which in turn encourage corporate responses. Examples include initiatives in Canada’s food sector to reduce single-use plastics and to strengthen Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices aligned with SDG 12 (Taşkın et al., 2020; Walker et al., 2021). The adoption of green practices also enhances competitiveness in international markets and supports efforts to reduce carbon emissions (Hepner et al., 2021; Khalaf et al., 2023). In contrast, in developing countries, limited purchasing power constrains the allocation of resources toward environmentally friendly products. Nevertheless, consumers in these contexts still tend to prefer sustainable products when prices are affordable and when supported by government policies (Babatunde et al., 2018; Liu, 2019; Shimul & Cheah, 2022).

Differences in purchasing power underscore that both economic and non-economic factors influence sustainable consumption decisions. In developed countries, environmental awareness, social norms, and sustainability-oriented marketing increase consumers’ intentions to purchase green products, while corporate commitment strengthens brand image and customer loyalty (Huo et al., 2025; Rahman & Nguyen-Viet, 2023; Zanon & Teichmann, 2016). In developing countries, although economic capacity is more limited, interest in environmentally friendly products increases when their benefits are perceived as directly relevant to daily life. Moreover, environmental knowledge can continue to drive purchasing decisions even when green products are priced higher (Kamel, 2020; Liu, 2019; Nocella et al., 2023).

Product innovation rooted in local wisdom has increasingly been recognised as a strategic pathway to strengthen sustainability and community empowerment in developing countries. Various initiatives leverage local resources while revitalising cultural values to meet the demands of modern markets. These initiatives range from natural-based personal care products (Kahraman & Kazançoğlu, 2019) to sustainable agriculture employing traditional cultivation techniques (Kurnia et al., 2022; Rahman & Nguyen-Viet, 2023), and cultural tourism experiences that integrate local products and practices to enhance economic benefits while preserving cultural heritage (Jaelani et al., 2025; Kamel, 2020). In addition, handicrafts made from natural materials such as rattan and bamboo, as well as lontar-based lontar-leaf packaging in Indonesia, exemplify how local materials can be transformed into culturally embedded sustainable products (Kosfraedi, 2024; Shimul & Cheah, 2022; Siarudin et al., 2023; Tan & Quang, 2023).

Green advertising has become increasingly important for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), as informative and credible messages enhance consumer awareness and purchase intentions (Aldaihani et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023). In Indonesia, MSMEs interact directly with local communities and are therefore well-positioned to leverage environmental issues as a source of competitive advantage. Practices observed in initiatives such as Creabrush demonstrate that green advertising requires clear and transparent information so that consumers understand product value and the justification for premium pricing, while also facilitating access to broader markets, including international markets that demand eco-friendly standards (Andriyansah et al., 2025; Munandar et al., 2025; Sholehuddin & Sudarmiatin, 2024). The effectiveness of green advertising is influenced by message composition and visual elements; the use of green colour schemes and environmental symbols has been shown to strengthen positive brand attitudes and purchase intentions (Lim et al., 2020; Sahin et al., 2019). Furthermore, MSMEs need to emphasise environmental benefits and build trust through supply chain transparency and clarity about product value, which, in turn, contributes to consumers’ willingness to pay more (Bailey et al., 2016; Duan & Aloysius, 2019).

Perceived credibility plays a pivotal role in increasing willingness to pay more for environmentally friendly products, as consumers are more inclined to accept premium prices when they trust the brand and its green claims. This finding is consistent with evidence that brand credibility and trust in environmental claims increase purchase likelihood across product categories (Akturan, 2020) and that strong brand identity is associated with higher purchase intentions (Guerreiro et al., 2023). Conversely, when consumers suspect greenwashing, trust declines and WTPM weakens, highlighting transparency as a critical factor (Bairrada et al., 2021; Knight et al., 2021; Shojaei et al., 2024). In addition, green future estimation increases willingness to pay more because consumers expect current green choices to yield future environmental benefits, especially when brands clearly communicate tangible, consistent impacts (Wu et al., 2024).

Several studies (Ampornklinkaew, 2025; Hasrama et al., 2025; Khan et al., 2025; Moon & Song, 2026) indicate that green advertising can shape consumer preferences toward sustainable products; however, its effectiveness is strongly contingent on consumer trust in the credibility of environmental claims. When advertisements are perceived as misleading or indicative of greenwashing, purchase responses tend to weaken. Cross-contextual evidence also suggests that credible sustainability cues, such as sustainability badges, enhance brand evaluations and willingness to pay more (Vinish et al., 2025). Moreover, green future estimation has a positive effect on the willingness to pay more among Generation Z consumers, and this effect reflects the importance of long-term environmental benefit expectations in premium pricing decisions (Gawshinde et al., 2025; Gomes et al., 2023; Witek & Kuźniar, 2021; Zhuang et al., 2021).

Existing green advertising research has largely focused on its effects on attitudes or purchase intentions (Khan et al., 2025; Zhao et al., 2025) and typically employs a single mediating variable, such as perceived credibility (Ampornklinkaew, 2025; Chaturvedi & Sangwan, 2025; Dondapati, 2025; Moon & Song, 2026; Rohden et al., 2025) or environmental awareness (Hasrama et al., 2025). In Asia, evidence related to green future estimation has more frequently been linked to green purchase decisions, such as in Bangladesh through extensions of the Theory of Planned Behavior (Nekmahmud & Fekete-Farkas, 2020), and in India, where green future estimation has been shown to heighten environmental concern (Gawshinde et al., 2025). Other studies demonstrate that source credibility, including influencer credibility, enhances purchase decisions by strengthening information credibility (Hasim & Mahbob, 2025; P et al., 2025). Despite the extensive body of research on green advertising, few studies have examined dual mediation mechanisms, specifically perceived credibility and green future estimation within the context of culturally rooted sustainable products from developing countries, particularly those produced by MSMEs.

In Indonesia, particularly in East Nusa Tenggara Province (Nusa Tenggara Timur, NTT) the lontar palm is often referred to as the “tree of life” due to its extensive contributions to food and beverages (e.g., sap processed into sugar or palm wine), construction materials, handicrafts (e.g., bags, hats, and the sasando musical instrument), traditional medicine, as well as its potential for bioethanol and organic fertiliser production (Kosfraedi, 2024). Lontar leaves (Borassus flabellifer) are also used in education, cultural traditions, and creative enterprises, and hold significant potential as materials and sources of inspiration for economically valuable, sustainable products. The integration of local wisdom into lontar-leaf packaging development is believed to support environmental conservation and the achievement of the SDGs (Lestari et al., 2024). Strengthened utilisation can foster the development of culturally distinctive and competitive handicraft products and can also contribute to the expansion of economic opportunities for local communities (Utomo et al., 2023). Lontar-based lontar-leaf packaging serve as tangible environmental and cultural signals that reinforce perceived credibility. The development of media and creative products grounded in local wisdom can further strengthen this synergy, as such initiatives contribute to cultural preservation and foster innovation (Sukadari et al., 2023).

This study examines the key mechanisms shaping consumer demand for sustainable products and their influence on consumers’ willingness to pay premium prices. Theoretically, the study extends signaling theory in green marketing by clarifying how environmental signals are translated into consumer value evaluations and premium payment intentions through specific psychological pathways. Methodologically, the study advances prior research by testing a parallel mediation model that positions green future estimation and perceived credibility as simultaneous mediators, and by validating these constructs within the context of a developing-country market. In practice, the findings offer actionable guidance for MSMEs on designing credible green signals, crafting communications that strengthen consumers’ future-oriented green evaluations, and developing more sustainable premium pricing strategies. Finally, this study offers empirical evidence from Indonesia and addresses an important gap in the contemporary green marketing literature, as this context remains underrepresented in international research.

2. Literature review

2.1 Signaling theory

Signaling theory explains the presence of information asymmetry between signalers, who possess superior information, and receivers, who have more limited knowledge. Signalers convey observable cues to demonstrate credibility, quality, or commitment, which receivers then use as a basis for evaluation and decision making (Connelly et al., 2011; Giachetti et al., 2024). Within this framework, signals must be credible; otherwise, receivers are likely to disregard them and refrain from responding (Gomes et al., 2023). Recent studies have linked the consumption of environmentally friendly products to consumers’ willingness to pay more through the lens of signaling theory (Lopes et al., 2024; Macchione Saes et al., 2025). When the environmental quality of a product is difficult to observe, corporate signals can reduce information asymmetry, making marketers’ ability to clearly communicate environmental benefits critical for shaping consumer perceptions and purchase intentions (Baskoro et al., 2023). In practice, sustainability signals often take the form of eco-labels and certifications that differentiate products in the marketplace and enhance perceived value (Baskoro et al., 2024). Such signals foster trust and strengthen willingness to pay more when consumers perceive that a brand’s commitment to environmental standards is accountable and verifiable (Le & Tang-Le, 2024). Sustainability signals are also associated with social identity, particularly among younger consumers who interpret green purchasing as an expression of personal values and self-image (Huh & Kim, 2024). Moreover, consistent sustainability communication can reinforce perceptions of price fairness and the price–quality relationship, thereby increasing consumers’ acceptance of premium pricing (Konuk, 2023; Lin et al., 2020). Accordingly, signaling theory provides a robust theoretical foundation for understanding how sustainability communication and cues shape trust and drive consumers’ willingness to pay more for environmentally friendly products.

2.2 Perceived credibility and willingness to pay more

Consumers are willing to pay higher prices for brands perceived as credible and authentic. This pattern has been documented both in the context of sustainable products more broadly (Kamboj & Matharu, 2021) and in the context of green products specifically, where green brand equity and brand credibility strengthen consumers’ willingness to pay more (Akturan, 2020). From a psychological perspective, credibility helps consumers assess risk and product quality, thereby increasing their acceptance of premium prices. Moral and ethical value dimensions may further reinforce this tendency when products are perceived as aligned with consumers’ personal beliefs and values (Hwang, 2018). Brand experience and perceived authenticity also deepen the influence of credibility on willingness to pay more (Safeer et al., 2021). Evidence from the food safety context similarly shows that trust in product attributes increases consumers’ willingness to pay higher prices (Bozoglu et al., 2019). Conversely, when credibility is questioned, consumer scepticism increases and willingness to pay more declines (Bie et al., 2025; Zhan et al., 2021). Overall, the literature consistently indicates that perceived credibility is a key determinant of willingness to pay more by reinforcing trust, authenticity, and consumers’ perceived ethical value.

H1:

Higher levels of perceived credibility lead to a greater willingness to pay more for sustainable products.

2.3 Green future estimation and willingness to pay more

Consumers who hold more optimistic projections regarding the future state of the environment and demonstrate stronger sustainability concerns tend to assign higher value to green products and are therefore more willing to pay premium prices. Environmental concerns and perceived product quality reinforce green purchase intentions, which, in turn, have implications for consumers’ willingness to pay more (Nekmahmud & Fekete-Farkas, 2020). In addition, consumers exhibit a higher willingness to pay for products that carry sustainability labels, indicating that a future-oriented green mindset plays an important role in shaping value perceptions and preferences (Huh & Kim, 2024). Communication and transparency regarding sustainability practices also enhance perceived product value and strengthen willingness to pay more (Wongprawmas et al., 2015). Furthermore, consumer education on sustainability and the environmental consequences of purchasing decisions serves as a critical driver that reinforces green future expectations and consumers’ commitment to paying premium prices (Kamboj & Matharu, 2021). Overall, green future estimation influences willingness to pay more because it reflects consumers’ beliefs that current consumption choices can generate positive environmental outcomes in the future.

H2:

Higher levels of green future estimation lead to a greater willingness to pay more for sustainable products.

2.4 Green advertising and willingness to pay more

Green advertising is increasingly used to translate rising environmental awareness into consumers’ acceptance of price premiums. Experimental studies show that exposure to green advertising and green (vs. non-green) appeals can increase willingness to pay, largely by strengthening perceived green value, and the effect depends on how the message is framed and made more concrete (Guo et al., 2024; Gutentag & Antonia Russell, 2025; Zheng et al., 2022). Willingness to pay also rises when eco-friendly ads are perceived as relevant and meaningful and when consumers are receptive to green advertising through trust-building mechanisms (Gotlieb, 2019; Nguyen-Viet & Thanh Tran, 2024). Credibility cues further support premium price acceptance, whereas skepticism toward green advertising can weaken it (Al Mamun et al., 2023; Nguyen-Viet & Nguyen, 2024).

H3:

Green advertising has a significant positive effect on consumers’ willingness to pay a premium.

2.5 Green advertising and perceived credibility

Green advertising that emphasises environmental benefits can enhance brand credibility when the message is delivered transparently and honestly, and aligns with genuine sustainability practices (Kumar & Tripathi, 2019). Advertiser characteristics can also strengthen advertising credibility; high levels of attractiveness and expertise make green messages more persuasive and enhance brand credibility in consumers’ eyes (Khandelwal & Singh, 2023). Furthermore, hedonic involvement and emotional appeals in advertising enhance favourable attitudes toward advertisements and, in turn, contribute to the development of perceived credibility. Green cues within advertisements serve as positive signals of brand responsibility, especially when sustainability messages remain consistent across various communication channels, including social media (Gonzalez-Lafaysse & Lapassouse-Madrid, 2016). Taken together, the literature suggests that green advertising contributes to higher perceived credibility when truthful claims, effective message sources, and coherent sustainability communication underpin it.

H4:

Green advertising has a positive and significant effect on perceived credibility.

2.6 Green advertising and green future estimation

Beyond promoting environmentally friendly products, green advertising increases awareness of the environmental consequences of consumption behaviour, thereby fostering more optimistic expectations of a green future (Kahraman & Kazançoğlu, 2019). When companies communicate their sustainability commitments effectively, consumers are more likely to believe that their support for green products contributes meaningfully to long-term environmental improvement (Khaireddine et al., 2023). This process is strengthened when advertising provides transparent, clear information, because credible environmental claims encourage consumers to form more optimistic expectations about future environmental outcomes (Prasad et al., 2017). Additionally, when advertising highlights practical benefits and fosters emotional alignment with sustainability values, consumers pay closer attention and show greater optimism about future environmental outcomes. (Vafaei-Zadeh et al., 2024). Thus, clear, credible, and relevant green advertising can play a critical role in reinforcing green future estimation, as it underpins consumers’ psychological orientations toward green attitudes and consumption choices.

H5:

Green advertising positively and significantly influences green future estimation.

2.7 Green advertising, perceived credibility, green future estimation, and willingness to pay more

Green advertising can increase willingness to pay more (WTPM) through two complementary psychological pathways, namely perceived credibility and green future estimation. When green advertisements communicate environmental claims clearly, consistently, and transparently, consumers are more likely to perceive the brand as credible. This enhanced credibility strengthens trust in the product’s environmental benefits and makes the acceptance of premium pricing more justifiable (Akturan, 2020; Kumar & Tripathi, 2019; Prasad et al., 2017; Rahman & Nguyen-Viet, 2023). At the same time, green advertising can reinforce consumers’ beliefs that their current consumption choices contribute to improved environmental conditions in the future. As a result, the long-term value of green products is perceived as higher, which in turn encourages a greater willingness to pay more (Huh & Kim, 2024; Kamboj & Matharu, 2021; Nekmahmud & Fekete-Farkas, 2020). Therefore, green advertising serves not merely as a promotional message but also as a catalyst for trust and future-oriented optimism, which explains why consumers are willing to pay a premium for environmentally friendly products (Akturan, 2020; Zabkar & Hosta, 2012).

H6:

The effect of green advertising on willingness to pay more is mediated by perceived credibility.

H7:

Green future estimation serves as a mediating mechanism through which green advertising influences willingness to pay more.

3. Methods

3.1 Sample and procedure

The present study employed a quantitative research design and collected primary data via an online questionnaire. The target respondents were consumers who had prior experience purchasing environmentally friendly products, such as eco-friendly packaging, natural soaps, recycled tissue products, reusable plastic bags or bottles, LED lighting, and food products manufactured using environmentally sustainable processes. A convenience sampling technique was applied. In total, 500 questionnaires were distributed directly to consumers who were connected to MSMEs operating in the East Nusa Tenggara Province (Nusa Tenggara Timur, NTT), Indonesia. These consumers were selected because they are considered potential agents of change in promoting the adoption of environmentally friendly products, particularly sustainable packaging made from lontar leaves. In addition, NTT specifically Kupang City, was chosen as the study location due to the high concentration of MSMEs that utilise lontar-based materials, making the region a relevant and contextually rich setting for examining consumer responses to sustainable packaging initiatives (Dadag, 2024).

After data screening, 401 valid responses were retained from the 500 distributed questionnaires for analysis. The screening procedure involved a set of preliminary questions designed to ensure respondents’ relevance to the research context. Specifically, respondents were asked: (1) whether they had previously purchased environmentally friendly products; (2) whether they paid attention to the materials used in products during purchase decisions; and (3) whether they had purchased and used product packaging made from lontar leaves or similar natural materials. Only respondents who confirmed prior experience in purchasing environmentally friendly products and demonstrated awareness of sustainable packaging materials were allowed to proceed to the main questionnaire. As a result, 401 respondents met the inclusion criteria and constituted the final sample for analysis. This sample size is considered adequate for the analytical approach employed in this study. Hair et al. (2020) the minimum sample size was determined using the ten-times rule, which suggests a sample size of at least 10 times the number of indicators used in the model. In this study, the measurement model comprised 11 indicators; therefore, the minimum required sample size was 110 respondents.

Ultimately, 401 valid responses were obtained and used for data analysis, representing a response rate of approximately 82%. A descriptive analysis was conducted to provide an overview of respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics. As presented in Table 1, 56% of the respondents (n = 224) were female, while 44% (n = 177) were male. In the context of NTT, female consumers tend to engage more frequently in shopping activities than male consumers, as women in Kupang city are more commonly responsible for managing daily and household needs. This distribution of roles results in a higher observed shopping frequency among women than among men.

Table 1. Demographic profile of participants (n = 401).

Variable Category Frequency Percentage (%)
Gender Female22456
Male17744
Total 401 100
Age < 20 years5313
20–29 years14937
30–39 years13233
40–49 years4411
≥ 50 years236
Total 401 100
Educational attainment High school13634
Diploma6717
Bachelor’s degree18646
Master’s/Doctoral degree123
Total 401 100
Occupation Student6516
Housewife338
Public/Private servants14737
Entrepreneur8922
Other6717
Total 401 100
Monthly < IDR1,000,0005313
IDR 1,000,000–IDR 2,999,9997017
IDR 3,000,000–IDR 4,999,99912331
IDR 5,000,000–IDR 6,999,9998922
> IDR 7,000,0006617
Total 401 100
Frequency buying sustainability product in the last 3 months Never51
1–28822
3–520551
>510326
Total 401 100

3.2 Measurement scale

The measurement model was evaluated using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS. PLS-SEM is a widely applied statistical technique for examining complex relationships among latent variables, which makes it particularly suitable for predictive-oriented research objectives (Hair et al., 2017). Screening questions were included in the questionnaire to ensure that only respondents with prior experience purchasing environmentally friendly products were included in the study. In addition, all measurement items were adapted to the local context of lontar-leaf packaging products and were translated using a back-translation procedure to ensure linguistic accuracy and conceptual equivalence.

Construct reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), and Average Variance Extracted (AVE). The results indicate that all constructs demonstrate satisfactory reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha and CR values exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.70, and adequate convergent validity, as evidenced by AVE values above 0.50. Discriminant validity was further evaluated using the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) ratio. The findings confirm that each construct is empirically distinct from the others (Fornell & Larcker, 1981; Henseler et al., 2015). All indicators exhibit outer loadings above the recommended threshold of 0.70, indicating that the measurement items are appropriate and internally consistent in capturing their respective constructs. The highest loading is observed for green future estimation (GFE1 = 0.910), while the lowest loading appears for green advertising (GA3 = 0.852); nevertheless, both values remain well within acceptable PLS-SEM standards. In addition, all variance inflation factor (VIF) values are well below the threshold of 5, suggesting no multicollinearity issues.

Table 2 summarises the results of the reliability and validity assessments. Overall, the measurement model demonstrates adequate robustness and is suitable for proceeding to the structural model evaluation, particularly for examining the relationships among green advertising (GA), green future estimation (GFE), perceived credibility (PC), and willingness to pay more (WTPM).

Table 2. Reliability and validity test.

CodeItemsFactor loadingsAVECR VIF
Green Advertising (Hasrama et al., 2025)
GA1Advertising about lontar-leaf packaging shows that producers/MSMEs pay attention to consumers’ environmental concerns0.8840.7580.8410.9042.175
GA2Advertising about lontar-leaf packaging emphasises the environmentally friendly aspects of lontar packaging0.8762.306
GA3Advertising about lontar-leaf packaging provides clear information on why lontar-leaf packaging is considered environmentally friendly0.8522.374
Green Future Estimation (Nekmahmud & Fekete-Farkas, 2020)
GFE1Environmentally friendly products (including lontar-leaf packaging) will become popular in our country0.9100.8250.7880.9042.143
GFE2Consumers will embrace the future of environmentally friendly products (including lontar-leaf packaging)0.9072.630
Perceived Credibility (Gomes et al., 2023)
PC1Advertising for environmentally friendly lontar-leaf packaging accurately conveys the environmental benefits of using such packaging0.9020.7810.8600.9142.623
PC2Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) that advertise lontar-leaf packaging have a genuine intention to protect the environment0.8711.538
PC3I am confident that the environmental claims presented in advertisements for lontar-leaf packaging are true0.8781.514
Willingness to pay more (Fauzi et al., 2024)
WTPM1I am willing to pay more to purchase products that use environmentally friendly lontar-leaf packaging.0.8740.7500.8330.9001,991
WTPM2Paying more for products with lontar-leaf packaging is reasonable in order to protect the environment0.8691,967
WTPM3I do not mind paying more if the product is packaged using natural, environmentally friendly materials such as lontar 0.8551,841

3.2.1 Fornell-Larcker criterion

The Fornell–Larcker criterion was used to assess discriminant validity by comparing the square roots of the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct (diagonal values) with the inter-construct correlations (off-diagonal values). As shown in Table 3, the diagonal values for all constructs (bolded) exceed the corresponding correlations within the same rows and columns. This result indicates that each construct explains its own indicators more strongly than it relates to other constructs, thereby confirming adequate discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).

Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion.

Latent variable123 4
1. GA0.871
2. GFE0.6900.908
3. PC0.7080.6010.884
4. WTPM0.5870.6510.6700.866

For example, the square root of the AVE for WTPM is 0.866, which exceeds its correlations with GA (0.587), GFE (0.651), and the other constructs in the model. Therefore, the measurement model satisfies the requirements for discriminant validity, indicating that all constructs are empirically distinct and have been measured appropriately in this study.

3.2.2 HTMT criterion

The heterotrait–monotrait (HTMT) ratio was employed to further assess discriminant validity by examining inter-construct correlations. Table 4 presents the HTMT results. All HTMT values in this study fall below the conservative threshold of 0.85. The highest HTMT value is 0.848, observed between GA and GFE. These findings indicate that each construct is empirically distinguishable from the others, thereby providing additional support for discriminant validity (Henseler et al., 2015).

Table 4. HTMT criterion.

Latent variable123 4
1. GA
2. GFE0.848
3. PC0.8320.729
4. WTPM0.7010.8040.790

In addition, the lowest HTMT value, which occurs between WTPM and GA (0.701), also remains well within the acceptable range. Therefore, the HTMT criterion confirms discriminant validity, indicating that the latent constructs in this study are distinct from one another both conceptually and statistically.

4. Findings

4.1 Structural model assessment

The structural model was employed to examine the hypothesised relationships among latent variables within the conceptual framework, using the PLS-SEM approach. In this study, the structural model evaluates both direct and indirect effects among the key constructs, including independent, dependent, and mediating variables (Hair et al., 2019, 2017). Path coefficients indicate the direction and strength of the relationships among constructs, whereas the coefficient of determination (R2) reflects the proportion of variance in each endogenous variable explained by its predictors. Higher R2 values indicate greater model explanatory power. The statistical significance of each path was assessed using p-values or t-statistics obtained through bootstrapping. Mediation effects were evaluated by examining indirect effects, while moderation effects were assessed through interaction terms.

Table 5 reports the R2 values, which indicate the proportion of variance in each dependent variable explained by its predictors. WTPM shows an R2 value of 0.546, indicating that the model explains 54.6% of the variance in WTPM and demonstrates strong predictive power. In contrast, PC has an R2 value of 0.501, suggesting that the model accounts for 50.1% of the variance in PC and that additional factors outside the current framework may play a substantial role in shaping credibility perceptions. GFE yields an R2 of 0.476, indicating that the model explains 47.6% of the variance. The moderate R2 for GFE indicates that the included predictors, such as green advertising, may not fully capture the primary determinants of green future estimation in the context of environmentally friendly packaging. These findings further suggest that GFE may function more prominently as an intervening construct, strengthening relationships among key variables, while also serving as an endogenous variable directly influenced by other constructs in the model.

Table 5. R-Square.

VariablesR-square R-square adjusted
GFE0.4760.475
PC0.5010.500
WTPM0.5460.543

From a methodological perspective, the relatively lower R2 value for PC does not undermine the model’s overall robustness, as both WTPM (R2 = 0.546) and PC (R2 = 0.501) demonstrate adequate explanatory power. Nevertheless, these results signal that future research should extend the nomological network of credibility by incorporating additional constructs, such as trust, attitudes, source attractiveness, and social awareness. Expanding the theoretical framework in this way would provide a more comprehensive explanation of credibility formation and enhance the model’s predictive capability regarding PC.

4.2 Hypothesis testing and mediation effects

Hypothesis testing was conducted using PLS-SEM to examine the direct effects among the model’s constructs. A structural path was considered statistically significant when the p-value was below 0.05, and the t-statistic exceeded 1.96. The results indicate that PC has a positive and significant effect on WTPM (β = 0.425, t = 8.129, p < .001), which supports the proposed hypothesis. GFE also exerts a positive and significant influence on WTPM (β = 0.380, t = 7.522, p < .001). In contrast, GA does not have a significant direct effect on WTPM (β = 0.024, t = 0.414, p = .679). However, GA shows a strong and significant effect on PC (β = 0.708, t = 15.901, p < .001) and on green future estimation (β = 0.690, t = 17.092, p < .001). A summary of these direct effects is presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Summary of hypotheses testing.

Hypothesis Path Original Sample (O) Sample Mean (M) Standard Deviation (STDV) T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) P values Result
Direct Effect
H1PC➔WTPM0.4250.4280.0528.1290.000Accepted
H2GFE➔WTPM0.3800.3770.0507.5220.000Accepted
H3GA➔WTPM0.0240.0200.0580.4140.679Declined
H4GA➔PC0.7080.7080.04515.9010.000Accepted
H5GA➔GFE0.6900.6880.04017.0920.000Accepted
Indirect Effect
H6GA➔PC➔WTPM0.3010.3030.0466.5020.000Accepted
H7GA➔GFE➔WTPM0.2620.2600.0386.9880.000Accepted

The indirect effect along the GA → PC → WTPM pathway is statistically significant (β = 0.301, t = 6.502, p < .001), which indicates that perceived credibility serves as an important mechanism through which green advertising influences willingness to pay more. When green advertising intensifies, consumers tend to perceive the brand as more credible, and this enhanced credibility increases their readiness to accept premium prices. In a similar manner, the indirect effect of green advertising on willingness to pay more through green future estimation is also significant (GA → GFE → WTPM; β = 0.262, t = 6.988, p < .001). This finding suggests that stronger green advertising fosters more optimistic expectations of future environmental benefits, which, in turn, encourage consumers to pay more for environmentally friendly products.

5. Discussion

First, the PLS-SEM results indicate that PC has a positive and statistically significant effect on WTPM (β = 0.425, t = 8.129, p < .001), as summarised in Table 6, confirming that the PC → WTPM path is statistically robust. This finding aligns with and extends prior literature by clarifying how credibility drives consumers’ willingness to pay a premium for green products. It is consistent with Akturan (2020), who shows that brand credibility supports pay-premium behavior and underscores the importance of expertise and trustworthiness in making green claims believable. In both studies, credibility helps justify the premium price by reducing doubts about green claims; however, while Akturan adopts a brand-based lens across product involvement levels, the present study suggests that for locally embedded natural materials such as lontar leaves, credibility can be an even stronger trigger of WTPM. Moreover, Kamboj and Matharu (2021) highlight that WTPM reflects consumers’ cognitive foundations (e.g., perceived effectiveness, attitudes, and knowledge). Accordingly, in lontar-leaf packaging, credibility emerges as a key gateway through which sustainability claims are accepted as genuine value rather than an added marketing cost.

Second, the structural model results indicate that GFE has a positive and statistically significant effect on WTPM for environmentally friendly lontar-leaf packaging (β = 0.380, t = 7.522, p < .001), as shown in Table 6. This finding suggests that a future-oriented green outlook leads consumers to view the price premium as an “investment” in long-term environmental benefits rather than merely an added cost. The result aligns with Nekmahmud and Fekete-Farkas (2020), who show that positive expectations about the future of green practices/marketing encourage green consumption decisions, and the present study extends this logic by demonstrating that such beliefs can also translate into a WTPM. In addition, the finding is consistent with the green signaling perspective, which views green choices as signals of prosocial commitment that increase acceptance of added value; accordingly, consumers are more willing to accept a premium price when they link their choice to a better environmental future (Huh & Kim, 2024). In the context of lontar-leaf packaging, GFE helps consumers interpret plastic-waste reduction and long-term ecosystem impacts as tangible benefits that justify the additional cost.

Third, contrary to H3, the results show that GA does not have a significant direct effect on WTPM. This finding differs from evidence reported in China, where controlled experimental designs often capture stronger advertising effects on premium-price outcomes. For instance, Guo et al. (2024) demonstrate that green advertising can increase pro-environmental willingness to pay, particularly when message framing (e.g., loss/negative framing) heightens consumers’ evaluation of environmental consequences, suggesting that GA is more likely to shift payment decisions when the stimulus is deliberately designed to make environmental trade-offs salient. Likewise, Zheng et al. (2022) show that GA appeals increase WTPM for green food products in China, especially when advertising helps reduce information asymmetry and is supported by institutional cues such as recognized green marks/labels, which make the “green” attribute easier to trust and price into the decision. In contrast, in NTT, lontar-leaf packaging is relatively familiar in everyday life. In such a setting, advertising exposure may function mainly as a reminder rather than a source of new value creation, so advertising alone is unlikely to trigger the financial sacrifice implied by paying a premium.

Fourth, the trust-based mediation pathway (GA → PC → WTPM) suggests that consumers view a price premium for lontar-leaf packaging as justifiable only when green advertising strengthens the credibility of sustainability claims. This aligns with Akturan (2020), who shows that brand credibility drives pay-premium behavior by reducing perceived risk and doubt, and with Kumar and Tripathi (2019), who indicate that credibility often influences behavioral intentions indirectly through shifts in evaluations and attitudes. The importance of credibility is especially salient in the lontar context, as GA in developing country settings frequently relies on ambiguous, hard-to-verify credence claims and limited certification or labeling, which heightens skepticism and greenwashing concerns (Prasad et al., 2017). Accordingly, the mediation effect of PC indicates that GA supports premium-price acceptance only when its claims are clear, consistent, and verifiable, enabling consumers to perceive the premium as genuine value rather than an added marketing cost.

Lastly, the future-oriented mediation pathway (GA → GFE → WTPM) suggests that educational and emotionally engaging green advertising helps consumers connect lontar-leaf packaging with long-term environmental benefits, leading them to perceive the price premium as an “investment” in a better future. Investment is consistent with Gomes et al. (2023), who report that GFE positively influences WTPM, indicating that future-oriented green beliefs raise the perceived value of green products. It also aligns with Zabkar and Hosta (2012), who argue that pro-environmental behavior develops from concern to willingness and is activated by information, while green consumption often requires sacrifice (higher costs) and thus depends on perceived benefits, including future outcomes and social meaning. Accordingly, the GFE pathway in this study reinforces the view that green advertising can mobilize WTPM not through direct price persuasion, but by strengthening consumers’ belief that choosing lontar today contributes to better environmental outcomes in the future, making the premium more acceptable when those long-term benefits feel tangible and worthwhile.

6. Implications

The findings of this study confirm that GA enhances WTPM primarily by improving PC and GFE. Accordingly, marketing campaigns for lontar-leaf packaging should present specific, consistent evidence, such as biodegradability, production processes, and estimated reductions in plastic use, alongside narratives highlighting the long-term environmental impacts on digital platforms (Akturan, 2020; Kumar & Tripathi, 2019; Rahman & Nguyen-Viet, 2023). To prevent trust erosion arising from suspicions of greenwashing, environmental claims must be transparent and verifiable, for example, through sustainability badges or labels and third-party endorsements (Bairrada et al., 2021; Knight et al., 2021; Shojaei et al., 2024). From a policy perspective, ecosystem strengthening should focus on establishing minimum standards for sustainability claims and labelling, complemented by incentives and sustainability-oriented digital literacy training for MSMEs, ensuring that green communication remains ethical and credible.

7. Limitations and future direction

This study has several limitations that also point to avenues for future research. First, the data were collected using a cross-sectional design and self-reported questionnaires, which limits the strength of causal inferences and may be subject to response bias. Future studies could adopt longitudinal or experimental designs and incorporate behavioural data, such as actual purchase records or product-choice data from e-commerce platforms, to strengthen causal inference. Second, the research context is limited to consumers in Indonesia and to eco-friendly packaging made from lontar leaves. As a result, the findings may not be directly generalisable to other types of green packaging or to different national contexts. Subsequent research should consider cross-regional or cross-country comparisons and examine differences across consumer segments, such as age, income, and levels of environmental literacy. Third, the relatively modest R2 values for perceived credibility and green future estimation suggest that additional explanatory variables remain unaccounted for. Future studies may extend the model by incorporating factors such as eco-literacy, environmental concern, perceived greenwashing, or trust in institutions. Researchers may also explore moderating variables, such as scepticism toward green claims or consumer involvement in environmental issues, to assess whether the proposed relationships vary across groups. Finally, green advertising in this study was measured as a general perception without distinguishing between message formats or content. Given that media type, message framing (rational versus emotional), and the use of local cultural narratives may lead to different consumer responses, future research is encouraged to employ real advertising stimuli and experimental designs to identify which elements of green advertising are most effective in enhancing perceived credibility, green future estimation, and willingness to pay a premium for lontar-leaf packaging.

8. Conclusion

This study demonstrates that green advertising, perceived credibility, and green future estimation play key roles in shaping WTPM for eco-friendly packaging made from lontar leaves in NTT. The PLS-SEM results confirm that GA does not exert a direct effect on WTPM, but operates indirectly by enhancing PC and strengthening projections of a greener environmental future. Both PC and GFE significantly increase WTPM, which shows that consumers are willing to pay a price premium when they trust a brand’s sustainability claims and believe that their consumption choices generate positive environmental impacts. At the same time, GA contributes to the reinforcement of PC, GFE, and WTPM, and this result indicates that the overall model has adequate explanatory power.

Ethics and consent

To ensure compliance with research ethics and educational regulations, this research was officially approved by the research institution and the Institute for Research and Community Service of Widya Mandira Catholic University No. 002/WM.H9/LPPM/SKKEP/VIII/2025. Official research permission has been granted, and the authorization letter is publicly accessible through its DOI link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19366187. All participants were informed about the purpose of the study prior to data collection, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. For participants under the age of 20, consent was also obtained from their parents or legal guardians. The consent was provided in written form, and participants were assured of the confidentiality and anonymity of their responses.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Apr 2026
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Lopes Amaral MA, Haro A, Putri DPE et al. The Impact of Green Advertising and the Mediating Role of Perceived Credibility on Consumers’ Purchase of Lontar-Based Products in Indonesia [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2026, 15:640 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179246.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 29 Apr 2026
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.