Keywords
ICT infrastructure; firm performance; security management; emerging markets; Routine Activity Theory; Resource-Based View; structural equation modeling; Peru; digital transformation
Information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure drives firm performance in emerging markets, yet institutional voids and security vulnerabilities often undermine its efficacy. The mechanisms linking ICT endowment, organizational security investment, and firm-level outcomes remain underexplored, particularly in developing economies.
We tested a recursive three-block structural equation model (SEM) on nationally representative microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (N = 9,966 firms across 14 sectors). The model integrated the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Routine Activity Theory (RAT) to specify pathways from ICT infrastructure, internet access, and digital human capital through security management investment to firm performance (measured as firm size category: micro vs. medium/large). We employed full-information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation with Satorra–Bentler robust standard errors to account for non-normal distributions in e-commerce adoption measures. Mediation analysis decomposed total effects via bootstrap confidence intervals (5,000 replications).
ICT infrastructure was the dominant predictor across all equations (β = 0.356 in security management; β = 0.327 in firm performance, both p < 0.001). Security management significantly mediated 17.6% of ICT’s total effect on performance (indirect β = 0.070, p < 0.001). Criminal victimization exposure directly predicted security investment (β = 0.060, p < 0.001), establishing a protective response mechanism predicted by Routine Activity Theory. Model fit indices confirmed excellent fit (CFI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.028, GFI = 0.986).
In volatile emerging market environments, security management functions as a strategic resource that transforms raw ICT connectivity into sustainable competitive advantage — a phenomenon we term “Digital Resilience.” These findings challenge technological determinism and provide a blueprint for firms and policymakers in developing economies to integrate security as a core dynamic capability rather than a cost center.
ICT infrastructure; firm performance; security management; emerging markets; Routine Activity Theory; Resource-Based View; structural equation modeling; Peru; digital transformation
Digital transformation has emerged as a defining strategic imperative for firms across all income levels, yet its organizational consequences remain heterogeneous and context-dependent. In high-income economies, the positive association between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and firm performance is well-established (Melville et al., 2004; Mithas et al., 2011; Aral & Weill, 2007). In emerging markets, however, the pathways through which digital resources translate into organizational outcomes are more complex, mediated by persistent infrastructure deficits, shallow digital skills markets, high business crime rates, and institutional environments that differ fundamentally from those of OECD economies (Cirera & Maloney, 2017; Katz & Callorda, 2019).
Peru offers a particularly revealing natural laboratory for this inquiry. As of 2023, only 44.9% of formally registered Peruvian firms report internet access, and a mere 7.8% engage in any form of digital commerce (INEI, 2024). Simultaneously, 15.3% of Peruvian firms report having been victims of at least one criminal act during 2023 — including robbery, extortion, vandalism, and fraud — a victimization prevalence that represents a material operational risk, particularly for Commerce (18.2%) and Transport (18.4%) sectors. The coexistence of digital heterogeneity and crime exposure creates a structural environment in which digitalization and security management are not merely parallel investments but potentially complementary capabilities whose interaction determines firm-level outcomes.
Despite the theoretical plausibility of this complementarity, the empirical literature has treated ICT investment and organizational security management as largely separate streams. This study addresses that gap by developing and testing an integrated structural model connecting ICT infrastructure endowment, internet access, digital human capital, e-commerce adoption, and criminal victimization exposure to security management investment and firm performance, using microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (EEA 2024; INEI). Drawing on the RBV and the Routine Activity Theory (RAT; Cohen & Felson, 1979), we propose a three-block recursive model estimated via path analysis on a matched sample of 9,966 firms spanning 14 economic sectors.
The study makes three original contributions. First, it provides the first large-sample SEM of the ICT–security–performance nexus using nationally representative enterprise data from Peru. Second, it extends RAT beyond individual-level victimization prediction to the organizational domain. Third, it reframes organizational security investment from a cost center to a strategic performance-generating resource (β = 0.197, p < 0.001), mediating 17.6% of ICT infrastructure’s total performance effect.
This study integrates two complementary theoretical perspectives: (1) the Resource-Based View (RBV) and its dynamic capabilities extension, which frames ICT adoption as a strategic, value-generating resource; and (2) the Routine Activity Theory (RAT), adapted to the organizational level, which explains why firms exposed to crime victimization invest more intensively in protective mechanisms that, in turn, improve operational resilience and performance outcomes.
2.2.1 Resource-based view and dynamic capabilities
The Resource-Based View, formulated by Wernerfelt (1984) and systematized by Barney (1991), posits that sustained competitive advantage derives from firm-specific resources that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN). ICT assets — hardware infrastructure, internet connectivity, and the human capital capable of exploiting them — constitute strategic resources that enable firms to generate superior performance outcomes (Bharadwaj, 2000; Melville et al., 2004). Building on RBV, Teece et al. (1997) introduced the dynamic capabilities perspective, emphasizing that firms must continuously sense opportunities, seize them through resource reconfiguration, and transform operational routines. Aral and Weill (2007) demonstrate that IT assets generate positive spillovers across the firm, enabling broader capability development.
2.2.2 ICT as an enabler of e-commerce
E-commerce represents the most visible and economically significant form of digital market participation for firms (Zhu et al., 2006). The Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework (Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990) establishes that technology readiness — operationalized through ICT infrastructure and internet access — is a primary determinant of e-commerce adoption. Zhu and Kraemer (2005) show that technology competence directly drives e-commerce value creation in a cross-national sample. Hajli et al. (2015) and Barbu et al. (2021) demonstrate positive effects of ICT investment on online sales performance in emerging market firms. For Peruvian SMEs specifically, Heredia Pérez et al. (2022) document that internet access and digital capability are the strongest predictors of online sales adoption.
2.2.3 Routine activity theory applied to business security
Cohen and Felson's (1979) Routine Activity Theory proposes that crime occurs when a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian converge. In its organizational adaptation, firms constitute targets when visible, accessible, and weakly protected. Exposure to criminal victimization is expected to increase firms’ investment in protective measures — physical security, surveillance technology, insurance, and cybersecurity infrastructure (Boba Santos, 2013; Holt & Bossler, 2016). Digitally endowed firms are better positioned to implement sophisticated security responses because they possess the ICT infrastructure necessary to integrate these systems.
2.2.4 Security management as a strategic resource for firm performance
Security investment is increasingly recognized not merely as a cost center but as a strategic resource that protects firm value and enables operational continuity (Gordon & Loeb, 2002; Anderson & Moore, 2006). Firms that invest in adequate security systems reduce expected losses from criminal activity, maintain operational continuity, and signal reliability to business partners (Böhme et al., 2015). Gordon and Loeb's (2002) model demonstrates that optimal security investment increases with the value of assets at risk, providing a theoretical rationale for why security investment is concentrated among larger, more digitally endowed firms. Kankanhalli et al. (2003) and Cavusoglu et al. (2004) confirm that organizational security investment positively affects firm performance through risk reduction.
Drawing on the portfolio perspective and the Oslo Manual taxonomy, we formulate the following nine testable hypotheses, summarized in Table 1:
Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with adoption of e-commerce sales.
Broader internet access is positively associated with e-commerce sales and procurement adoption.
Higher digital human capital is positively associated with e-commerce adoption.
Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with security management investment.
Broader internet access is positively associated with security management investment.
Prior criminal victimization is positively associated with subsequent security management investment.
Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with firm performance.
Greater security management investment is positively associated with firm performance.
Broader internet access is positively associated with firm performance.
Peru exhibits significant heterogeneity in firm-level ICT endowment and security exposure, maximizing variance in key constructs. According to INEI (2024), 44.9% of surveyed firms report internet access, while only 21.2% engage in any form of digital commerce, suggesting that infrastructure endowment does not automatically translate into e-commerce adoption. 15.3% of firms report having been victims of at least one criminal act in 2023. This combination of digital heterogeneity and security vulnerability makes Peru’s firm-level data uniquely valuable for investigating the co-evolution of digitalization and security management as drivers of business performance — a gap identified by Katz and Callorda (2019) and Cirera and Maloney (2017) in the Latin American business development literature.
This study employs a cross-sectional, quantitative research design grounded in secondary microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (Encuesta Económica Anual, EEA 2024), conducted by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). The EEA 2024 is a nationally representative establishment-level survey covering the 2023 fiscal year. Microdata access was obtained through INEI’s Microdata Catalogue (https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/). This study uses three thematic modules: (i) Chapter 01 — firm identification; (ii) ICT Module — digital infrastructure, internet access, human capital, and e-commerce; and (iii) Security Module — crime victimization, security measures adopted, and security expenditure. The inner join of the ICT and Security modules yielded a matched sample of 10,327 firms, of which 9,966 constitute the analytical sample after listwise deletion (missing rate < 0.5%).
The analytical sample comprises 9,966 firms distributed across 14 economic sectors ( Table 2). Commerce and Manufacturing (SME) are the largest sectors, representing 29.8% and 22.8% of the sample, respectively, with approximately 42% of observations concentrated in Metropolitan Lima.
All constructs are derived from validated survey items in the EEA 2024. Multi-item constructs were scored as the mean proportion of affirmative responses (0–1). Table 3 provides the full operationalization.
3.4.1 Justification of the SEM approach
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is appropriate because: (1) the model involves multiple simultaneous equations with endogenous mediators; (2) the hypotheses include both direct and indirect (mediated) effects; and (3) SEM explicitly accounts for measurement error (Hair et al., 2019; Kline, 2016; Byrne, 2016). Given the non-normal distribution of several indicators — e-commerce adoption (Skewness = 3.70; Excess Kurtosis = 14.27) — we employ Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimation with robust standard errors (Satorra–Bentler correction). Model estimation used semopy v2.3 in Python (Meshcheryakov & Igolkina, 2021).
3.4.2 Model specification
The structural model comprises three recursive blocks:
3.4.3 Model evaluation criteria
We evaluated model fit using multiple indices following standard SEM guidelines ( Table 4). These include comparative fit indices (CFI, TLI), absolute fit indices (RMSEA, SRMR), and relative chi-square (χ2/df ).
| Index | Acceptable | Excellent |
|---|---|---|
| CFI | ≥ 0.90 | ≥ 0.95 |
| TLI | ≥ 0.90 | ≥ 0.95 |
| RMSEA | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 0.06 |
| SRMR | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 0.05 |
| χ2/df | ≤ 5.0 | ≤ 3.0 |
| AIC/BIC | Lower = better | — |
3.4.4 Mediation analysis
Indirect effects were computed as the product of path coefficients ( ), following Baron and Kenny (1986) and Sobel (1982). Bootstrap confidence intervals (5,000 replications) were also computed to provide bias-corrected significance tests for indirect effects.
Harman’s single-factor test: the first unrotated factor explained 18.7% of total variance (well below the 50% threshold), providing no evidence of pervasive common method variance (Podsakoff et al., 2003). The architectural separation of ICT and Security modules — administered as separate questionnaire chapters — further reduces same-source bias. The dependent variable (C8) is an administrative categorical variable, not a self-reported perceptual measure, providing a procedural remedy for CMV.
All variance inflation factors (VIF) are below 2.0, substantially below the threshold of 10 (Hair et al., 2019), indicating that multicollinearity does not constitute a threat. Detailed VIF diagnostics for each construct are presented in Table 5.
Table 6 reports the descriptive statistics for all constructs (N = 9,966). ICT Infrastructure (C1) shows a mean of 0.578 (SD = 0.206). Internet access (C2) is present in 44.9% of firms. E-commerce adoption remains nascent: means of 0.021 for both C4 and C5 indicate fewer than 8% of firms engage in any form of digital commerce. Criminal victimization (C6) affects 15.3% of firms; Security Management (C7) averages 0.257 (SD = 0.258), with the IQR (0.000–0.444) suggesting a bimodal distribution. Large and medium-sized firms (C8) represent 63.3% of the sample.
Table 7 presents the Pearson correlation matrix. ICT Infrastructure (C1) exhibits the strongest bivariate associations with Security Management (r = 0.441, p < 0.001) and Firm Performance (r = 0.482, p < 0.001). The complete correlation structure is visualized in Figure 1.
| (1) C1 | (2) C2 | (3) C3 | (4) C4 | (5) C5 | (6) C6 | (7) C7 | (8) C8 | (9) C9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) ICT Infra | 1.000 | ||||||||
| (2) Internet | 0.488*** | 1.000 | |||||||
| (3) Digital HC | 0.140*** | 0.119*** | 1.000 | ||||||
| (4) Ecom Sales | 0.148*** | 0.202*** | 0.068*** | 1.000 | |||||
| (5) Ecom Proc. | 0.105*** | 0.106*** | 0.069*** | 0.369*** | 1.000 | ||||
| (6) Victimizat. | 0.050*** | 0.042*** | 0.016 | 0.075*** | 0.067*** | 1.000 | |||
| (7) Security | 0.441*** | 0.343*** | 0.059*** | 0.104*** | 0.079*** | 0.086*** | 1.000 | ||
| (8) Firm Perf. | 0.482*** | 0.362*** | 0.043*** | 0.079*** | 0.026** | −0.031* | 0.393*** | 1.000 | |
| (9) Econ. Group | 0.150*** | 0.137*** | 0.039*** | 0.039*** | 0.009 | 0.033*** | 0.150*** | 0.154*** | 1.000 |
Table 8 presents the standardized path coefficients, standard errors, t-statistics, and p-values for all structural paths.
To assess the adequacy of the structural model, we evaluated fit indices following standard SEM guidelines ( Table 9). Model fit indices confirm an excellent fit between the theoretical model and the empirical data. CFI (0.988) and TLI (0.976) both exceed the 0.95 threshold. RMSEA (0.028) is well below 0.06. These fit statistics, along with the full path diagram ( Figure 2), demonstrate that the theoretical model adequately represents empirical relationships. The χ2/df ratio above 3.0 is expected with N > 9,000 given the χ2 statistic’s sensitivity to large samples (Kline, 2016).
All nine hypotheses were supported ( Table 10). ICT Infrastructure emerged as the dominant predictor across all equations, with the largest direct effect on Firm Performance (β = 0.327, p < 0.001). Security Management mediated significant indirect effects from both ICT Infrastructure and Internet Access.
| H | Relationship | β (std.) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | ICT Infrastructure → E-commerce Sales | 0.060*** | Supported |
| H2 | Internet Access → E-commerce Sales | 0.168*** | Supported |
| H3 | Digital Human Capital → E-commerce Sales | 0.040*** | Supported |
| H4 | ICT Infrastructure → Security Management | 0.356*** | Supported (strong) |
| H5 | Internet Access → Security Management | 0.164*** | Supported |
| H6 | Criminal Victimization → Security Management | 0.060*** | Supported |
| H7 | ICT Infrastructure → Firm Performance | 0.327*** | Supported (strong) |
| H8 | Security Management → Firm Performance | 0.197*** | Supported (strong) |
| H9 | Internet Access → Firm Performance | 0.134*** | Supported |
Cohen’s f2 values confirm the economic significance of the structural relationships. Block 2 (Security Management): R2 = 0.220, f2 = 0.282 — medium-to-large effect. Block 3 (Firm Performance): R2 = 0.290, f2 = 0.408 — large effect. Block 1 (E-commerce Sales: R2 = 0.046, f2 = 0.048; Procurement: R2 = 0.018, f2 = 0.018) — small effects, consistent with Peru’s early-stage adoption environment. ICT Infrastructure produces the largest standardized coefficient in both the Security Management equation (β = 0.356) and the Firm Performance equation (β = 0.327).
Table 11 presents the decomposition of total effects into direct and indirect components.
| Predictor | Direct Effect (β) | Indirect via C7 (β) | Total Effect (β) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 ICT Infrastructure | 0.327*** | 0.356 × 0.197 = 0.070*** | 0.397*** |
| C2 Internet Access | 0.134*** | 0.164 × 0.197 = 0.032*** | 0.166*** |
| C6 Criminal Victimization | — | 0.060 × 0.197 = 0.012*** | 0.012*** |
Table 12 presents construct means by economic sector. Universities (ICT Infra = 0.738; Internet = 0.926; Security = 0.422) and Electricity & Energy (ICT Infra = 0.689; Security = 0.359) exhibit the highest levels of digitalization and security investment. Transport & Communications (Victimization = 0.184) and Commerce (Victimization = 0.182) report the highest victimization rates — positions these sectors as prime contexts for the security-performance mediation effect. Sector-level heterogeneity is illustrated in Figure 3.
Digital Human Capital (C3) exhibits a small but statistically significant negative direct coefficient on Firm Performance (β = −0.032, p < 0.001). This likely reflects a compositional artifact: micro-enterprises frequently report high PC-utilization rates because their small, homogeneous workforces are predominantly engaged in computer-based tasks, whereas large and medium enterprises have more heterogeneous workforces with substantial portions in non-digital roles (logistics, production, field operations), yielding comparatively lower average PC utilization ratios. The indirect effect of C3 through e-commerce is positive (β = +0.040 × 0.197 = +0.008), partially offsetting the negative direct path.
This study provides robust evidence for a three-block theoretical architecture where ICT infrastructure, security management, and firm performance co-evolve (R2 = 0.220 for Security; R2 = 0.290 for Performance). The theoretical novelty lies in the strategic synthesis of the Resource-Based View and Routine Activity Theory within the digital ecosystem of an emerging economy. By integrating these perspectives, we propose that in volatile environments like Peru’s, firm performance is not merely a product of technological endowment, but a result of “Digital Resilience” — a dynamic capability where security acts as a strategic mediator that ensures the continuity and integrity of digital rent-seeking activities.
Our findings challenge the technological determinism prevalent in studies from developed economies. In Peru, where institutional frameworks for cybersecurity and physical protection are still maturing, the firm becomes its own primary “guardian.” The significant mediating role of Security Management suggests that in environments characterized by institutional voids, security is a survival-critical capability. Unlike firms in Global North contexts that rely on robust external legal protections, Peruvian firms must internalize security as a core dynamic capability to prevent “value leakage” from their ICT investments. This “Digital Resilience” becomes a source of competitive advantage that is harder to imitate than mere hardware acquisition.
ICT Infrastructure is the dominant predictor across all equations (β = 0.356 in Security; β = 0.327 in Performance). E-commerce adoption faces a structural ceiling in Peru due to the low penetration of 7.8%. The non-significant path from E-commerce to Security (β = 0.014, p = 0.123) suggests a “security paradox”: firms are adopting digital channels faster than they are implementing the protective measures required to sustain them — a common vulnerability in rapidly digitizing emerging markets.
This study investigated how ICT resources and security management interact to determine performance in 9,966 Peruvian firms (EEA 2024). ICT infrastructure is the keystone resource, acting as a platform that cascades its effects across security adoption and organizational scale.
This research extends RAT to the organizational level, demonstrating that the “capable guardian” mechanism is mediated by technological endowment. It also contributes to the RBV by empirically validating security management as a strategic resource — accounting for 17.6% of the total effect of ICT on performance. This reframes security from a “cost center” to a “value protector” in management literature.
• Security as a Profit Center: Managers must shift their perception of security from an operational expense to a strategic capability. Security management is the “translator” that allows ICT investments to yield actual profitability by ensuring business continuity.
• Holistic Digital Human Capital: Connectivity alone is insufficient. Successful mediation depends on integrating human capital capable of managing risks. Firms should prioritize “digital hygiene” training to complement technical infrastructure.
• Beyond Connectivity: Public policies in developing nations often focus solely on access. “Unprotected access” is inefficient. Governments should incentivize cybersecurity certification frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001) for SMEs to secure the national digital economy.
• Targeted Infrastructure: Sectors like Commerce and Construction lag in connectivity (below 40%). Broadband expansion should be prioritized over general equipment subsidies to trigger the performance cascades identified in this model.
While the sample size provides exceptional statistical power, the cross-sectional nature of EEA 2024 limits causal claims. Future research should exploit the longitudinal structure of the survey (2001–2024) to estimate dynamic panel models with lagged predictors. Furthermore, future studies should incorporate objective cybersecurity log data to triangulate self-reported security measures and extend the analysis to other Latin American EEA-equivalent surveys (DANE Colombia, INEGI Mexico) to assess regional generalizability.
The analytical dataset underlying this study is publicly available in Zenodo:
Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19430763
Citation: Restrepo Morales, et. al., (2024) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19430763
Contents: The dataset comprises 9,966 observations across 34 variables spanning nine constructs: ICT Infrastructure (C1), Internet Access (C2), Digital Human Capital (C3), E-commerce Sales (C4), E-commerce Procurement (C5), Criminal Victimization (C6), Security Management (C7), Firm Performance (C8), and Economic Group Membership (C9). Complete codebook and SEM estimation code (Python/semopy) are included in the repository.
Access: Openly accessible, no login required.
Data Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI), Peru’s Annual Economic Survey (Encuesta Económica Anual) 2024.
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| F1000Research | - | - |
|
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Cybersecurity
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
| Invited Reviewers | |
|---|---|
| 1 | |
|
Version 1 08 May 26 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)