ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Securing the Digital Edge: How Security Management Mediates
the Impact of ICT Infrastructure on Firm Performance
in Emerging Markets

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 08 May 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background

Information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure drives firm performance in emerging markets, yet institutional voids and security vulnerabilities often undermine its efficacy. The mechanisms linking ICT endowment, organizational security investment, and firm-level outcomes remain underexplored, particularly in developing economies.

Methods

We tested a recursive three-block structural equation model (SEM) on nationally representative microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (N = 9,966 firms across 14 sectors). The model integrated the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Routine Activity Theory (RAT) to specify pathways from ICT infrastructure, internet access, and digital human capital through security management investment to firm performance (measured as firm size category: micro vs. medium/large). We employed full-information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation with Satorra–Bentler robust standard errors to account for non-normal distributions in e-commerce adoption measures. Mediation analysis decomposed total effects via bootstrap confidence intervals (5,000 replications).

Results

ICT infrastructure was the dominant predictor across all equations (β = 0.356 in security management; β = 0.327 in firm performance, both p < 0.001). Security management significantly mediated 17.6% of ICT’s total effect on performance (indirect β = 0.070, p < 0.001). Criminal victimization exposure directly predicted security investment (β = 0.060, p < 0.001), establishing a protective response mechanism predicted by Routine Activity Theory. Model fit indices confirmed excellent fit (CFI = 0.988, RMSEA = 0.028, GFI = 0.986).

Conclusions

In volatile emerging market environments, security management functions as a strategic resource that transforms raw ICT connectivity into sustainable competitive advantage — a phenomenon we term “Digital Resilience.” These findings challenge technological determinism and provide a blueprint for firms and policymakers in developing economies to integrate security as a core dynamic capability rather than a cost center.

Keywords

ICT infrastructure; firm performance; security management; emerging markets; Routine Activity Theory; Resource-Based View; structural equation modeling; Peru; digital transformation

1. Introduction

Digital transformation has emerged as a defining strategic imperative for firms across all income levels, yet its organizational consequences remain heterogeneous and context-dependent. In high-income economies, the positive association between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and firm performance is well-established (Melville et al., 2004; Mithas et al., 2011; Aral & Weill, 2007). In emerging markets, however, the pathways through which digital resources translate into organizational outcomes are more complex, mediated by persistent infrastructure deficits, shallow digital skills markets, high business crime rates, and institutional environments that differ fundamentally from those of OECD economies (Cirera & Maloney, 2017; Katz & Callorda, 2019).

Peru offers a particularly revealing natural laboratory for this inquiry. As of 2023, only 44.9% of formally registered Peruvian firms report internet access, and a mere 7.8% engage in any form of digital commerce (INEI, 2024). Simultaneously, 15.3% of Peruvian firms report having been victims of at least one criminal act during 2023 — including robbery, extortion, vandalism, and fraud — a victimization prevalence that represents a material operational risk, particularly for Commerce (18.2%) and Transport (18.4%) sectors. The coexistence of digital heterogeneity and crime exposure creates a structural environment in which digitalization and security management are not merely parallel investments but potentially complementary capabilities whose interaction determines firm-level outcomes.

Despite the theoretical plausibility of this complementarity, the empirical literature has treated ICT investment and organizational security management as largely separate streams. This study addresses that gap by developing and testing an integrated structural model connecting ICT infrastructure endowment, internet access, digital human capital, e-commerce adoption, and criminal victimization exposure to security management investment and firm performance, using microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (EEA 2024; INEI). Drawing on the RBV and the Routine Activity Theory (RAT; Cohen & Felson, 1979), we propose a three-block recursive model estimated via path analysis on a matched sample of 9,966 firms spanning 14 economic sectors.

The study makes three original contributions. First, it provides the first large-sample SEM of the ICT–security–performance nexus using nationally representative enterprise data from Peru. Second, it extends RAT beyond individual-level victimization prediction to the organizational domain. Third, it reframes organizational security investment from a cost center to a strategic performance-generating resource (β = 0.197, p < 0.001), mediating 17.6% of ICT infrastructure’s total performance effect.

2. Theoretical framework and hypotheses development

2.1 Conceptual overview

This study integrates two complementary theoretical perspectives: (1) the Resource-Based View (RBV) and its dynamic capabilities extension, which frames ICT adoption as a strategic, value-generating resource; and (2) the Routine Activity Theory (RAT), adapted to the organizational level, which explains why firms exposed to crime victimization invest more intensively in protective mechanisms that, in turn, improve operational resilience and performance outcomes.

2.2 Theoretical foundations

2.2.1 Resource-based view and dynamic capabilities

The Resource-Based View, formulated by Wernerfelt (1984) and systematized by Barney (1991), posits that sustained competitive advantage derives from firm-specific resources that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN). ICT assets — hardware infrastructure, internet connectivity, and the human capital capable of exploiting them — constitute strategic resources that enable firms to generate superior performance outcomes (Bharadwaj, 2000; Melville et al., 2004). Building on RBV, Teece et al. (1997) introduced the dynamic capabilities perspective, emphasizing that firms must continuously sense opportunities, seize them through resource reconfiguration, and transform operational routines. Aral and Weill (2007) demonstrate that IT assets generate positive spillovers across the firm, enabling broader capability development.

2.2.2 ICT as an enabler of e-commerce

E-commerce represents the most visible and economically significant form of digital market participation for firms (Zhu et al., 2006). The Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework (Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990) establishes that technology readiness — operationalized through ICT infrastructure and internet access — is a primary determinant of e-commerce adoption. Zhu and Kraemer (2005) show that technology competence directly drives e-commerce value creation in a cross-national sample. Hajli et al. (2015) and Barbu et al. (2021) demonstrate positive effects of ICT investment on online sales performance in emerging market firms. For Peruvian SMEs specifically, Heredia Pérez et al. (2022) document that internet access and digital capability are the strongest predictors of online sales adoption.

2.2.3 Routine activity theory applied to business security

Cohen and Felson's (1979) Routine Activity Theory proposes that crime occurs when a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian converge. In its organizational adaptation, firms constitute targets when visible, accessible, and weakly protected. Exposure to criminal victimization is expected to increase firms’ investment in protective measures — physical security, surveillance technology, insurance, and cybersecurity infrastructure (Boba Santos, 2013; Holt & Bossler, 2016). Digitally endowed firms are better positioned to implement sophisticated security responses because they possess the ICT infrastructure necessary to integrate these systems.

2.2.4 Security management as a strategic resource for firm performance

Security investment is increasingly recognized not merely as a cost center but as a strategic resource that protects firm value and enables operational continuity (Gordon & Loeb, 2002; Anderson & Moore, 2006). Firms that invest in adequate security systems reduce expected losses from criminal activity, maintain operational continuity, and signal reliability to business partners (Böhme et al., 2015). Gordon and Loeb's (2002) model demonstrates that optimal security investment increases with the value of assets at risk, providing a theoretical rationale for why security investment is concentrated among larger, more digitally endowed firms. Kankanhalli et al. (2003) and Cavusoglu et al. (2004) confirm that organizational security investment positively affects firm performance through risk reduction.

2.3 Research hypotheses

Drawing on the portfolio perspective and the Oslo Manual taxonomy, we formulate the following nine testable hypotheses, summarized in Table 1:

H1:

Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with adoption of e-commerce sales.

H2:

Broader internet access is positively associated with e-commerce sales and procurement adoption.

H3:

Higher digital human capital is positively associated with e-commerce adoption.

H4:

Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with security management investment.

H5:

Broader internet access is positively associated with security management investment.

H6:

Prior criminal victimization is positively associated with subsequent security management investment.

H7:

Greater ICT infrastructure endowment is positively associated with firm performance.

H8:

Greater security management investment is positively associated with firm performance.

H9:

Broader internet access is positively associated with firm performance.

Table 1. Summary of research hypotheses.

HRelationshipDirectionTheory
H1ICT Infra → E-commerce Sales+RBV/TOE
H2Internet Access → E-commerce+RBV/TOE
H3Digital Human Capital → E-commerce+RBV
H4ICT Infra → Security Management+RBV/RAT
H5Internet Access → Security Management+RBV/RAT
H6Criminal Victimization → Security Management+RAT
H7ICT Infra → Firm Performance+RBV
H8Security Management → Firm Performance+RBV/Security Econ.
H9Internet Access → Firm Performance+RBV

2.4 Contextual rationale: Peru as an emerging market setting

Peru exhibits significant heterogeneity in firm-level ICT endowment and security exposure, maximizing variance in key constructs. According to INEI (2024), 44.9% of surveyed firms report internet access, while only 21.2% engage in any form of digital commerce, suggesting that infrastructure endowment does not automatically translate into e-commerce adoption. 15.3% of firms report having been victims of at least one criminal act in 2023. This combination of digital heterogeneity and security vulnerability makes Peru’s firm-level data uniquely valuable for investigating the co-evolution of digitalization and security management as drivers of business performance — a gap identified by Katz and Callorda (2019) and Cirera and Maloney (2017) in the Latin American business development literature.

3. Methodology

3.1 Research design and data source

This study employs a cross-sectional, quantitative research design grounded in secondary microdata from Peru’s Annual Economic Survey 2024 (Encuesta Económica Anual, EEA 2024), conducted by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). The EEA 2024 is a nationally representative establishment-level survey covering the 2023 fiscal year. Microdata access was obtained through INEI’s Microdata Catalogue (https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/). This study uses three thematic modules: (i) Chapter 01 — firm identification; (ii) ICT Module — digital infrastructure, internet access, human capital, and e-commerce; and (iii) Security Module — crime victimization, security measures adopted, and security expenditure. The inner join of the ICT and Security modules yielded a matched sample of 10,327 firms, of which 9,966 constitute the analytical sample after listwise deletion (missing rate < 0.5%).

3.2 Sample characteristics

The analytical sample comprises 9,966 firms distributed across 14 economic sectors ( Table 2). Commerce and Manufacturing (SME) are the largest sectors, representing 29.8% and 22.8% of the sample, respectively, with approximately 42% of observations concentrated in Metropolitan Lima.

Table 2. Sectoral distribution of the analytical sample (N = 9,966).

SectorN%Cum. %
Commerce2,97329.8329.83
Manufacturing (SME)2,26822.7652.59
Services2,09020.9773.56
Transport & Communications7988.0181.57
Construction6766.7888.35
Private Education2422.4390.78
Hydrocarbons1992.0092.78
Artisanal Fishing1651.6694.44
Manufacturing (large)1541.5595.99
Universities1081.0897.07
Electricity & Energy950.9598.02
Industrial Fishing870.8798.89
Restaurants570.5799.46
Aquaculture540.54100.00
Total 9,966100

3.3 Operationalization of variables

All constructs are derived from validated survey items in the EEA 2024. Multi-item constructs were scored as the mean proportion of affirmative responses (0–1). Table 3 provides the full operationalization.

Table 3. Operationalization of constructs.

CodeConstructTypeItems (source)α/Note
C1ICT InfrastructureComposite (0–1)PT01_1_1 to PT01_1_9: computer, laptop, tablet, smartphone, server, LAN, Wi-Fi, intranet, ERP/CRM (k = 9)α = 0.716
C2Internet AccessBinary (0/1)PT05_1_1: firm has internet connectionSingle item
C3Digital Human CapitalContinuous (0–1)PT02_1_1: share of workers using a computer (÷100)Single item
C4E-commerce SalesComposite (0–1)PT07A_1_1 to PT07A_1_7: online sales channels used (k = 7)Formative
C5E-commerce ProcurementComposite (0–1)PT07B_1_1 to PT07B_1_7: online procurement channels (k = 7)Formative
C6Criminal VictimizationBinary (0/1)PS01_1_1 to PS01_1_7: victim of ≥1 crime type → dichotomizedDichotomized
C7Security ManagementComposite (0–1)PS03_1_1 to PS03_1_9: security measures adopted (CCTV, alarms, guards, cybersecurity; k = 9)α = 0.813
C8Firm PerformanceBinary (0/1)CodFormato: 1 = Large/Medium (F2); 0 = Micro (M or N)Dependent
C9Economic GroupBinary (0/1)CODPERTENECEGRUPOE: 1 = belongs to a business groupControl

3.4 Analytical strategy: Structural equation modeling

3.4.1 Justification of the SEM approach

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is appropriate because: (1) the model involves multiple simultaneous equations with endogenous mediators; (2) the hypotheses include both direct and indirect (mediated) effects; and (3) SEM explicitly accounts for measurement error (Hair et al., 2019; Kline, 2016; Byrne, 2016). Given the non-normal distribution of several indicators — e-commerce adoption (Skewness = 3.70; Excess Kurtosis = 14.27) — we employ Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) estimation with robust standard errors (Satorra–Bentler correction). Model estimation used semopy v2.3 in Python (Meshcheryakov & Igolkina, 2021).

3.4.2 Model specification

The structural model comprises three recursive blocks:

Block1ICTEnablement of Digital Commerce
C4ECOMV=β11C1+β12C2+β13C3+ζ1
C5ECOMC=β21C1+β22C2+β23C3+ζ2
Block2Security Management Antecedents
C7SEG=β31C1+β32C2+β33C4+β34C6+ζ3
Block3Firm Performance
C8=β41C1+β42C2+β43C3+β44C4+β45C7+β46C9+ζ4

3.4.3 Model evaluation criteria

We evaluated model fit using multiple indices following standard SEM guidelines ( Table 4). These include comparative fit indices (CFI, TLI), absolute fit indices (RMSEA, SRMR), and relative chi-square (χ2/df ).

Table 4. Model fit index thresholds.

IndexAcceptableExcellent
CFI≥ 0.90≥ 0.95
TLI≥ 0.90≥ 0.95
RMSEA≤ 0.08≤ 0.06
SRMR≤ 0.08≤ 0.05
χ2/df≤ 5.0≤ 3.0
AIC/BICLower = better

3.4.4 Mediation analysis

Indirect effects were computed as the product of path coefficients ( βa×βb ), following Baron and Kenny (1986) and Sobel (1982). Bootstrap confidence intervals (5,000 replications) were also computed to provide bias-corrected significance tests for indirect effects.

3.5 Common method bias assessment

Harman’s single-factor test: the first unrotated factor explained 18.7% of total variance (well below the 50% threshold), providing no evidence of pervasive common method variance (Podsakoff et al., 2003). The architectural separation of ICT and Security modules — administered as separate questionnaire chapters — further reduces same-source bias. The dependent variable (C8) is an administrative categorical variable, not a self-reported perceptual measure, providing a procedural remedy for CMV.

3.6 Multicollinearity diagnostics

All variance inflation factors (VIF) are below 2.0, substantially below the threshold of 10 (Hair et al., 2019), indicating that multicollinearity does not constitute a threat. Detailed VIF diagnostics for each construct are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Variance inflation factors (VIF).

ConstructVIFDiagnosis
C1 — ICT Infrastructure1.653✓ No concern
C2 — Internet Access1.411✓ No concern
C3 — Digital Human Capital1.029✓ No concern
C4 — E-commerce Sales1.200✓ No concern
C5 — E-commerce Procurement1.167✓ No concern
C6 — Criminal Victimization1.021✓ No concern
C7 — Security Management1.350✓ No concern
C8 — Firm Performance1.420✓ No concern
C9 — Economic Group1.042✓ No concern

4. Results

4.1 Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations

Table 6 reports the descriptive statistics for all constructs (N = 9,966). ICT Infrastructure (C1) shows a mean of 0.578 (SD = 0.206). Internet access (C2) is present in 44.9% of firms. E-commerce adoption remains nascent: means of 0.021 for both C4 and C5 indicate fewer than 8% of firms engage in any form of digital commerce. Criminal victimization (C6) affects 15.3% of firms; Security Management (C7) averages 0.257 (SD = 0.258), with the IQR (0.000–0.444) suggesting a bimodal distribution. Large and medium-sized firms (C8) represent 63.3% of the sample.

Table 6. Descriptive statistics (N = 9,966).

ConstructCodeMeanSDMinP25MedianP75Max
ICT InfrastructureC10.5780.2060.1110.4440.5560.7781.000
Internet AccessC20.4490.4970.0000.0000.0001.0001.000
Digital Human CapitalC30.6180.3610.0100.2800.7001.0001.000
E-commerce SalesC40.0210.0750.0000.0000.0000.0000.750
E-commerce ProcurementC50.0210.0810.0000.0000.0000.0001.000
Criminal VictimizationC60.1530.3600.0000.0000.0000.0001.000
Security ManagementC70.2570.2580.0000.0000.2220.4441.000
Firm PerformanceC80.6330.4820.0000.0001.0001.0001.000
Economic GroupC90.0800.2710.0000.0000.0000.0001.000

Table 7 presents the Pearson correlation matrix. ICT Infrastructure (C1) exhibits the strongest bivariate associations with Security Management (r = 0.441, p < 0.001) and Firm Performance (r = 0.482, p < 0.001). The complete correlation structure is visualized in Figure 1.

Table 7. Pearson Correlation Matrix (N = 9,966).

(1) C1(2) C2(3) C3(4) C4(5) C5(6) C6(7) C7(8) C8 (9) C9
(1) ICT Infra1.000
(2) Internet0.488***1.000
(3) Digital HC0.140***0.119***1.000
(4) Ecom Sales0.148***0.202***0.068***1.000
(5) Ecom Proc.0.105***0.106***0.069***0.369***1.000
(6) Victimizat.0.050***0.042***0.0160.075***0.067***1.000
(7) Security0.441***0.343***0.059***0.104***0.079***0.086***1.000
(8) Firm Perf.0.482***0.362***0.043***0.079***0.026**−0.031*0.393***1.000
(9) Econ. Group0.150***0.137***0.039***0.039***0.0090.033***0.150***0.154***1.000

*** p < 0.001;

** p < 0.01;

* p < 0.05. Lower triangular matrix.

9ed66695-9ba3-4472-a8e9-b44d8be8af58_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Pearson correlation matrix for all nine constructs (N = 9,966).

*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.

Source: EEA 2024, INEI.

4.2 Structural model results

Table 8 presents the standardized path coefficients, standard errors, t-statistics, and p-values for all structural paths.

Table 8. Structural path coefficients (Standardized).

Block/HPathβSEtpSig.R2
Block 1: ICT → E-commerce
H1C1 ICT → C4 E-com. Sales0.0600.0115.333<0.001***
H2C2 Internet → C4 E-com. Sales0.1680.01114.970<0.001***0.046
H3C3 Digital HC → C4 E-com. Sales0.0400.0104.013<0.001***
H1C1 ICT → C5 E-com. Procurement0.0640.0115.597<0.001***
H2C2 Internet → C5 E-com. Procurement0.0680.0115.994<0.001***0.018
H3C3 Digital HC → C5 E-com. Procurement0.0520.0105.197<0.001***
Block 2: ICT + Victimization → Security
H4C1 ICT → C7 Security Mgmt.0.3560.01035.101<0.001***
H5C2 Internet → C7 Security Mgmt.0.1640.01015.989<0.001***0.220
C4 E-com. → C7 Security0.0140.0091.5430.123n.s.
H6C6 Victimization → C7 Security Mgmt.0.0600.0096.748<0.001***
Block 3: Digitalization + Security → Performance
H7C1 ICT → C8 Firm Performance0.3270.01031.659<0.001***
H9C2 Internet → C8 Firm Performance0.1340.01013.526<0.001***
C3 Digital HC → C8 Firm Performance−0.0320.009−3.754<0.001***0.290
C4 E-com. → C8 Firm Performance−0.0170.009−1.9480.051n.s.
H8C7 Security → C8 Firm Performance0.1970.01020.560<0.001***
C9 Economic Group → C8 Firm Performance0.0590.0096.849<0.001***

4.3 Model fit

To assess the adequacy of the structural model, we evaluated fit indices following standard SEM guidelines ( Table 9). Model fit indices confirm an excellent fit between the theoretical model and the empirical data. CFI (0.988) and TLI (0.976) both exceed the 0.95 threshold. RMSEA (0.028) is well below 0.06. These fit statistics, along with the full path diagram ( Figure 2), demonstrate that the theoretical model adequately represents empirical relationships. The χ2/df ratio above 3.0 is expected with N > 9,000 given the χ2 statistic’s sensitivity to large samples (Kline, 2016).

Table 9. Model fit indices.

IndexValueReference ThresholdDiagnosis
CFI0.988≥ 0.95✓ Excellent
TLI0.976≥ 0.90✓ Excellent
RMSEA0.028≤ 0.06✓ Excellent
SRMR0.041≤ 0.08✓ Excellent
GFI0.986≥ 0.95✓ Excellent
χ2/df4.12≤ 5.0✓ Acceptable
AIC84,231Lower = better
BIC84,419Lower = better
9ed66695-9ba3-4472-a8e9-b44d8be8af58_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Full path diagram of the three-block recursive SEM model.

CFI = 0.988, TLI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.028, GFI = 0.986. Solid lines = significant paths (p < 0.001). Source: EEA 2024, INEI.

Source: semopy v2.3 estimation on EEA 2024 microdata.

4.4 Hypothesis testing

All nine hypotheses were supported ( Table 10). ICT Infrastructure emerged as the dominant predictor across all equations, with the largest direct effect on Firm Performance (β = 0.327, p < 0.001). Security Management mediated significant indirect effects from both ICT Infrastructure and Internet Access.

Table 10. Summary of hypothesis testing.

HRelationshipβ (std.)Result
H1ICT Infrastructure → E-commerce Sales0.060***Supported
H2Internet Access → E-commerce Sales0.168***Supported
H3Digital Human Capital → E-commerce Sales0.040***Supported
H4ICT Infrastructure → Security Management0.356***Supported (strong)
H5Internet Access → Security Management0.164***Supported
H6Criminal Victimization → Security Management0.060***Supported
H7ICT Infrastructure → Firm Performance0.327***Supported (strong)
H8Security Management → Firm Performance0.197***Supported (strong)
H9Internet Access → Firm Performance0.134***Supported

*** p < 0.001. All nine hypotheses supported.

4.5 Effect sizes and explanatory power

Cohen’s f2 values confirm the economic significance of the structural relationships. Block 2 (Security Management): R2 = 0.220, f2 = 0.282 — medium-to-large effect. Block 3 (Firm Performance): R2 = 0.290, f2 = 0.408 — large effect. Block 1 (E-commerce Sales: R2 = 0.046, f2 = 0.048; Procurement: R2 = 0.018, f2 = 0.018) — small effects, consistent with Peru’s early-stage adoption environment. ICT Infrastructure produces the largest standardized coefficient in both the Security Management equation (β = 0.356) and the Firm Performance equation (β = 0.327).

4.6 Mediation analysis: Indirect effects

Table 11 presents the decomposition of total effects into direct and indirect components.

Table 11. Direct, indirect, and total effects on firm performance (C8).

PredictorDirect Effect (β)Indirect via C7 (β)Total Effect (β)
C1 ICT Infrastructure0.327***0.356 × 0.197 = 0.070***0.397***
C2 Internet Access0.134***0.164 × 0.197 = 0.032***0.166***
C6 Criminal Victimization0.060 × 0.197 = 0.012***0.012***

*** p < 0.001. Indirect path from C1 (β = 0.070) = 17.6% of total effect (β = 0.397). Criminal victimization operates exclusively through the security management channel.

4.7 Sector-level analysis

Table 12 presents construct means by economic sector. Universities (ICT Infra = 0.738; Internet = 0.926; Security = 0.422) and Electricity & Energy (ICT Infra = 0.689; Security = 0.359) exhibit the highest levels of digitalization and security investment. Transport & Communications (Victimization = 0.184) and Commerce (Victimization = 0.182) report the highest victimization rates — positions these sectors as prime contexts for the security-performance mediation effect. Sector-level heterogeneity is illustrated in Figure 3.

Table 12. Construct means by economic sector.

SectorNICT InfraInternetE-com SalesSecurityFirm SizeVictimization
Universities1080.7380.9260.0740.4220.9910.222
Restaurants570.7270.6670.0000.3661.0000.193
Electricity & Energy950.6890.5680.0000.3591.0000.168
Hydrocarbons1990.6740.7040.0130.3210.5730.101
Manufacturing (large)1540.6510.6750.0930.2820.4550.117
Industrial Fishing870.6450.8510.0780.2080.5290.126
Transport7980.6250.5550.0210.3000.7090.184
Services2,0900.5860.5000.0180.2690.5830.157
Private Education2420.5760.5000.0250.2720.6650.161
Manufacturing (SME)2,2680.5650.4580.0150.2330.5360.110
Construction6760.5540.3950.0030.2190.6570.154
Commerce2,9730.5520.3330.0280.2470.6960.182
Artisanal Fishing1650.6050.2910.0050.2840.7390.048
Aquaculture540.4840.2220.0050.2140.3890.111
9ed66695-9ba3-4472-a8e9-b44d8be8af58_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Construct means by economic sector (N = 9,966). Sectors sorted by ICT infrastructure mean.

Source: EEA 2024, INEI.

4.8 Unexpected finding: Negative effect of digital human capital on performance

Digital Human Capital (C3) exhibits a small but statistically significant negative direct coefficient on Firm Performance (β = −0.032, p < 0.001). This likely reflects a compositional artifact: micro-enterprises frequently report high PC-utilization rates because their small, homogeneous workforces are predominantly engaged in computer-based tasks, whereas large and medium enterprises have more heterogeneous workforces with substantial portions in non-digital roles (logistics, production, field operations), yielding comparatively lower average PC utilization ratios. The indirect effect of C3 through e-commerce is positive (β = +0.040 × 0.197 = +0.008), partially offsetting the negative direct path.

5. Discussion

5.1 Overview and theoretical integration: The digital resilience framework

This study provides robust evidence for a three-block theoretical architecture where ICT infrastructure, security management, and firm performance co-evolve (R2 = 0.220 for Security; R2 = 0.290 for Performance). The theoretical novelty lies in the strategic synthesis of the Resource-Based View and Routine Activity Theory within the digital ecosystem of an emerging economy. By integrating these perspectives, we propose that in volatile environments like Peru’s, firm performance is not merely a product of technological endowment, but a result of “Digital Resilience” — a dynamic capability where security acts as a strategic mediator that ensures the continuity and integrity of digital rent-seeking activities.

5.2 Implications for emerging markets: The resilience gap

Our findings challenge the technological determinism prevalent in studies from developed economies. In Peru, where institutional frameworks for cybersecurity and physical protection are still maturing, the firm becomes its own primary “guardian.” The significant mediating role of Security Management suggests that in environments characterized by institutional voids, security is a survival-critical capability. Unlike firms in Global North contexts that rely on robust external legal protections, Peruvian firms must internalize security as a core dynamic capability to prevent “value leakage” from their ICT investments. This “Digital Resilience” becomes a source of competitive advantage that is harder to imitate than mere hardware acquisition.

5.3 Block analysis and boundary conditions

ICT Infrastructure is the dominant predictor across all equations (β = 0.356 in Security; β = 0.327 in Performance). E-commerce adoption faces a structural ceiling in Peru due to the low penetration of 7.8%. The non-significant path from E-commerce to Security (β = 0.014, p = 0.123) suggests a “security paradox”: firms are adopting digital channels faster than they are implementing the protective measures required to sustain them — a common vulnerability in rapidly digitizing emerging markets.

6. Conclusion

This study investigated how ICT resources and security management interact to determine performance in 9,966 Peruvian firms (EEA 2024). ICT infrastructure is the keystone resource, acting as a platform that cascades its effects across security adoption and organizational scale.

6.1 Theoretical contributions

This research extends RAT to the organizational level, demonstrating that the “capable guardian” mechanism is mediated by technological endowment. It also contributes to the RBV by empirically validating security management as a strategic resource — accounting for 17.6% of the total effect of ICT on performance. This reframes security from a “cost center” to a “value protector” in management literature.

6.2 Managerial implications

  • Security as a Profit Center: Managers must shift their perception of security from an operational expense to a strategic capability. Security management is the “translator” that allows ICT investments to yield actual profitability by ensuring business continuity.

  • Holistic Digital Human Capital: Connectivity alone is insufficient. Successful mediation depends on integrating human capital capable of managing risks. Firms should prioritize “digital hygiene” training to complement technical infrastructure.

6.3 Policy implications

  • Beyond Connectivity: Public policies in developing nations often focus solely on access. “Unprotected access” is inefficient. Governments should incentivize cybersecurity certification frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001) for SMEs to secure the national digital economy.

  • Targeted Infrastructure: Sectors like Commerce and Construction lag in connectivity (below 40%). Broadband expansion should be prioritized over general equipment subsidies to trigger the performance cascades identified in this model.

6.4 Limitations and future research

While the sample size provides exceptional statistical power, the cross-sectional nature of EEA 2024 limits causal claims. Future research should exploit the longitudinal structure of the survey (2001–2024) to estimate dynamic panel models with lagged predictors. Furthermore, future studies should incorporate objective cybersecurity log data to triangulate self-reported security measures and extend the analysis to other Latin American EEA-equivalent surveys (DANE Colombia, INEGI Mexico) to assess regional generalizability.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 May 2026
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Restrepo Morales JA, Rodríguez Flores EA, Suárez Pizzarello MA et al. Securing the Digital Edge: How Security Management Mediates
the Impact of ICT Infrastructure on Firm Performance
in Emerging Markets [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2026, 15:678 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179961.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 08 May 2026
Views
10
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Jun 2026
Aryendra Dalal, Middle Georgia State University, Macon, Georgia, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 10
This paper examines how security management mediates the relationship between ICT infrastructure and firm performance using a nationally representative sample of nearly 10,000 Peruvian firms. The authors combine the Resource-Based View with Routine Activity Theory in a three-block structural equation ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Dalal A. Reviewer Report For: Securing the Digital Edge: How Security Management Mediates
the Impact of ICT Infrastructure on Firm Performance
in Emerging Markets [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
. F1000Research 2026, 15:678 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.198527.r487064)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 May 2026
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.