Keywords
Fermented seafood, Marine invertebrates, Microbiome, Allergenicity mitigation, Microbial heritage transfer, Green biorefinery, Industrial cross-application, Circular economy
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
While fermented finfish products dominate the global discourse on marine fermentation, the indigenous fermentation of marine invertebrates, including crustaceans, bivalves, cephalopods, and echinoderms, remains a highly complex and under-researched domain of food science. This review synthesizes the current literature to highlight the phylum-specific biotechnological processes governing these foods. By analyzing distinct coastal micro-ecologies, we contrast traditional halophilic bacterial dominance with modern and unconventional processing deviations, such as sugar-assisted low-salt fermentations, sequential strain fortification of fungi and bacteria, enzymatic pretreatments, and targeted microbial consortia. We explore advanced proteolytic pathways that yield specific umami markers, functional compounds like γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory peptides, and improve the textural gelation of myofibrillar proteins. Crucially, this review addresses modern safety paradigms, detailing how targeted fermentation windows mitigate biogenic amines and how seasonal temperature fluctuations impact the proliferation of pathogens like Aeromonas spp. in bivalves. We highlight breakthrough interventions in shellfish allergy management, demonstrating how specific microbial starters (e.g., Limosilactobacillus fermentum) and synergistic physical and chemical hurdle technologies destroy immunoglobulin E (IgE)-binding epitopes on tropomyosin. Finally, we explore the future of marine fermentation, emphasizing its evolution from spontaneous preservation into precise bio-engineering. We provide a comprehensive matrix of industrial cross-applications, discuss the circular blue economy via the green biorefinery of shell waste and shrimp heads, and introduce the critical concept of microbial heritage transfer by applying indigenous fermentation methodologies to sustainable substrates to recreate the flavors of endangered species without ecological harm.
Fermented seafood, Marine invertebrates, Microbiome, Allergenicity mitigation, Microbial heritage transfer, Green biorefinery, Industrial cross-application, Circular economy
For millennia, humans have utilized microbes to transform perishable marine resources into shelf-stable, umami-rich foods. However, the global discourse surrounding fermented seafood predominantly focuses on finfish, ranging from ancient Roman garum to modern Southeast Asian fish sauces. This fish-centric narrative obscures a vast, parallel domain of indigenous biotechnology: the fermentation of marine invertebrates.1,2
Crustaceans, bivalves, cephalopods, and echinoderms present fundamentally different biological substrates for fermentation compared to finfish. Because these organisms possess highly variable structural proteins—including dense myofibrillar networks and chitinous exoskeletons—alongside distinct lipid profiles and environmental adaptations, the microbial communities that colonize them and the resulting chemical transformations are highly distinct. Consequently, these traditional foods are frequently mischaracterized as merely “spoiled seafood.” In reality, they are complex, spontaneous biochemical reactors carefully managed by indigenous cultural practices.1
This review aims to shift the research paradigm beyond finfish. By synthesizing recent literature on products ranging from Indonesian Terasi (shrimp), Korean Jogaejeot (clams)3 and Nakji-jeot (octopus)4, to innovative fermented squid viscera, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of non-fish marine fermentation. We explore how supply chain environments and unique processing methodologies shape the microbiome, translate the biochemistry of flavor enhancement, assess methodologies for mitigating shellfish allergenicity regarding tropomyosin, and synthesize these findings to provide a practical framework for industrial cross-application and ecological conservation.
While conventional marine fermentation relies on fundamental parameters, utilizing raw seafood, high salinity, and extended aging, recent literature highlights how highly regulated processing steps are required to overcome the biological challenges posed by different invertebrate phyla.
The fermentation of crustaceans, particularly shrimp, is the most extensively documented. Traditional products such as Terasi (Indonesia) and Kapi (Thailand) are produced in Southeast Asia through sun-drying and the application of high salt concentrations (20–30%).1,2,5 This high salinity acts as a stringent selective barrier, permitting only halophilic microbes, such as Tetragenococcus halophilus and several species of Bacillus, to thrive.1,6 The profound influence of the local marine environment is evident in Thai Kapi production, where the origin of the raw material determines the characteristics of the final product. For example, Kapi Ta Dam (black paste) is derived from Mesopodopsis orientalis collected from mangrove canals, whereas Kapi Ta Deang (red paste) utilizes Acetes species from seagrass beds. This exemplifies how coastal micro-ecologies establish the biochemical baseline for indigenous fermentation.7
To meet contemporary health requirements and improve production efficiency, food science has developed two major deviations from traditional spontaneous fermentation:
Sugar-Assisted Low-Salt Fermentation: Reducing salt concentrations to 5–10% significantly increases the risk of pathogenic growth, necessitating the addition of saccharides such as glucose. The sugar lowers water activity and provides a rapidly metabolizable substrate for lactic acid bacteria (LAB). This engineered parameter limits the fermentation window to 7–21 days and actively prevents the accumulation of biogenic amines like histamine.6,8
Two-Step Strain Fortification: This precision-engineered approach deliberately alternates fungi and bacteria to maximize proteolysis. Researchers have achieved a rapid 16-day fermentation cycle by initially inoculating shrimp paste with Cladosporium for extensive protein degradation over 12 days, followed by an inoculation of Enterococcus faecalis for 4 days of targeted flavor refinement. This targeted succession drastically reduces total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) while maximizing amino acid nitrogen (AAN), effectively sidestepping the biochemical unpredictability of traditional prolonged aging.9
Bivalves (clams, oysters, mussels) are filter feeders and, unlike shrimp, naturally bioaccumulate a wide variety of environmental microbes, including pathogenic Vibrio species and marine biotoxins.10,11 Spontaneous fermentation in these species can be highly unpredictable and hazardous.
To eliminate this unpredictability, modern bivalve fermentation employs radical deviations from traditional methodologies. For Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas), researchers use surface sterilization techniques and intentionally inoculate the homogenate with a highly controlled, defined microbial consortium comprised of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kazachstania, and Lactobacillus pentosus, optimized to outcompete wild spoilage bacteria.12 For New Zealand green-lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus), attempting to ferment raw tissue directly results in severe spoilage due to overpowering endogenous gut bacteria. The scientific solution is thermal-pretreatment fermentation. This involves a brief initial boiling to destroy the wild microflora and denature endogenous digestive enzymes, creating a sterile matrix that is subsequently inoculated with commercial LAB starter cultures.13
Squid viscera, a major industrial by-product comprising up to 20% of the animal mass, pose significant utilization challenges via standard high-salinity spontaneous fermentation. A highly efficient modern approach circumvents this by utilizing an enzymatic pretreatment followed by co-culturing.
Before the real fermentation phase starts, the viscera are incubated at 45 °C with a commercial alkaline protease for 4 h to partially degrade strong tissues into bioavailable peptides, and a thermal inactivation step at 85 °C takes place. Only after this pretreatment, the substrates are inoculated with a specific equivalent ratio of two selected strains, Bacillus tropicum YL14 and Acinetobacter guillouiae YL25, in a low-salt environment near 4%. This synergistic co-inoculation significantly reduces pH and TVB-N while rapidly accelerating AAN production.14
Sea urchins depend on a specialized gut microbiome to digest complex structural carbohydrates from macroalgae in their natural environment.15,16 In the fermentation of sea urchin gonads by indigenous communities such as Bekasang in Indonesia, a unique botanical deviation is used to modify the microbial environment. Traditional producers do not only use osmotic stress through salt, but also incorporate starfruit water (Averrhoa carambola) into the raw gonads. The starfruit extract, due to high concentrations of oxalates, phenols, and flavonoids, acts as a natural antimicrobial and preservative. This particular botanical intervention selectively inhibits spoilage viruses, bacteria, and fungi while promoting the growth of desirable protease-producing bacteria, such as Staphylococcus piscifermentans, which hydrolyze the urchin proteins into flavorful peptides.17
The transformative potential of marine invertebrate fermentation is rooted in profound proteolysis and metabolic conversion, which fundamentally alter both the flavor profile and the physical architecture of the food matrix.
Bacterial enzymes degrade structural proteins to free amino acids (FAAs), mainly glutamic acid and aspartic acid, in fermented crustacean pastes.1,18 In pre-treated squid viscera, starter cultures with branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (BCAT) activity catabolize leucine and valine to high-impact volatile compounds, such as 3-methylbutanol (malty aroma) and 3-methylbutyric acid (fruity and cheesy aroma), producing a multi-dimensional flavor profile that effectively masks intrinsic marine odors.14
Microbial fermentation also serves as a highly efficient biological deodorization tool. In aquatic species with a strong propensity to generate fishy odors, such as eel, specific fermentation by Staphylococcus nepalensis degrades polyunsaturated fatty acids, effectively eliminating undesirable lipid-oxidation byproducts like 1-octen-3-ol and 1-heptanol.19
Furthermore, ambient oxygen control during fermentation has a profound effect on flavor chemistry. Studies on fermented fish sauces demonstrate that anaerobic atmospheric control drastically inhibits the oxidation of lipids into sharp, rancid short-chain fatty acids (such as n-butanoic acid). This atmospheric control results in a markedly sweeter, milder, and highly palatable aromatic profile compared to the pungent notes produced by aerobic fermentation.20
Fermentation profoundly impacts the physical texture of marine invertebrates. When shrimp myofibrillar proteins are aseptically fermented using Limosilactobacillus fermentum 6b, the resulting microbial acid production and enzymatic activity induce structural reconstruction. This process promotes intermolecular cross-linking, significantly increasing the α-helical content and surface hydrophobicity of the proteins.21 Macroscopically, this microbial remodeling improves gel strength by over 59%, enhances water-holding capacity, and forms a dense, organized three-dimensional printable gel network, establishing a foundation for next-generation texturized seafood products.21
Besides the taste and texture, these ferments have been proven to provide important functional health benefits. In the process of Terasi fermentation, some bacteria utilize glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) to convert free glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) which has neuroprotective and antihypertensive effects.8 Marine fermentation also provides strong cardiovascular benefits through profound proteolysis. Extended fermentation of Thai Kapi leads to the release of highly active ACE inhibitory peptides. These peptides, generated by extensive enzymatic hydrolysis of shrimp proteins, have potent antihypertensive effects and strong radical-scavenging antioxidative activities, which increase aggressively with fermentation time, and serve as effective endogenous functional bio-preservatives.7 Moreover, bivalve fermentation greatly improves mineral bioavailability. Fermentation of oyster homogenates with S. cerevisiae alters the chemical bonding state of zinc, increasing its in vitro digestibility and cellular antioxidant capacity.12
While fermentation is historically a preservation technique, marine invertebrates present distinct safety hurdles that require advanced microbiological interventions.
Biogenic amines are produced by intensive protein breakdown during fermentation, particularly histamine.22 Metabolomic profiling of low-salt Terasi revealed a complex pattern in which histamine and cadaverine reached a peak at the beginning of fermentation and then declined over the course of fermentation. Prolonged fermentation under low-salt conditions leads to the accumulation of putrefaction compounds such as indole-3-acetic acid.6 Moreover, safety protocols are largely affected by real-world supply chain dynamics. On-site assessments of salt-fermented octopus and clams show frequent temperature fluctuations greater than 10 °C during the summer and fall in local markets and online distribution channels. Such a thermal deviation causes a dangerous shift in β-diversity, favoring a bloom of spoilage-associated Pseudomonadaceae and Bacillaceae at the expense of beneficial LAB.23 Moreover, cold storage of bivalves such as Meretrix meretrix (Asian hard clam) does not prevent all pathogens. Psychrotrophic strains of Aeromonas hydrophila and A. veronii are able to express increased hemolytic and proteolytic virulence factors even at refrigeration temperatures, emphasizing the absolute need for strict thermal and sanitary controls.24
Shellfish allergy, a lifelong IgE hypersensitivity disease, is mainly caused by the heat-stable muscle protein tropomyosin.25 New food processing techniques have emerged as synergistic strategies to reduce allergenicity by destroying or masking IgE-binding epitopes.25
Biological Modification: Fermentation is considered an effective hypoallergenic tool. The proteolytic enzymes secreted by LAB, for instance L. fermentum 6b, break down the peptide bonds of shrimp myofibrillar proteins, leading to the direct destruction of linear allergenic epitopes. Immunological tests have shown that fermentation by L. fermentum can lower the IgE-binding rate of shrimp tropomyosin by over 12.5%.21
Synergistic Hurdle Technologies: Individual treatments can reduce allergenicity, but combined methodologies are exponentially more effective. Mild physical pre-treatments with steam or ultrasound unfold the protein structure, exposing hidden tropomyosin epitopes to subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis or polyphenol crosslinking.25 Also, the combination of hydrostatic pressure with food-grade antimicrobials such as thiamine dilaurylsulfate (TDS) allows a synergistic 4-log reduction of highly resistant pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus in raw-fermented clams without thermal degradation, ensuring safety while maintaining the desired raw texture.26
The synthesis of current literature reveals that the fermentation of marine invertebrates is undergoing a profound paradigm shift. It is evolving from a localized, spontaneous preservation method into a highly precise, multidisciplinary science.
Safety versus authenticity is a central issue in the modernization of fermented seafood. Rich, complex, and culturally important flavor profiles are produced by traditional spontaneous fermentations, which depend on the natural microbial ecosystem, especially the local marine environment. However, the use of only wild microflora presents unacceptable risks in today’s global supply chains. Interventions such as thermal-pretreatment fermentation and the addition of commercial starter cultures address these safety concerns and make the fermentation process reproducible. But the complete removal of native microbiomes risks making these heritage foods taste uniform. This gap should be addressed by future research targeting the isolation and culture of indigenous benign strains from traditional ferments. The development of bespoke starter consortia from the source environment (e.g., culturing native Staphylococcus piscifermentans from wild sea urchins) will enable the industry to ensure commercial safety while authentically maintaining regional flavor profiles.
The era of empirical iteration in marine fermentation is concluding, driven by the integration of multi-omics technologies. Previously, researchers could only hypothesize how a fermented product achieved its final flavor or toxicity. Today, the integration of 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing with advanced metabolomics allows scientists to draw direct, mechanistic lines between specific microbes and their chemical outputs. By understanding the exact biochemical pathways of lipid oxidation and the Maillard reaction,27 processors can select microbial strains that intentionally suppress off-odors while actively upregulating the synthesis of functional compounds like GABA and ACE-inhibitory peptides.
A highly promising application of this multi-omics revolution lies in ecological conservation. Many highly prized traditional fermentations rely on rare, ecologically sensitive, or endangered marine species. For example, indigenous variations of Bakasang from Eastern Indonesia rely on giant clams (Tridacnidae), a heavily protected species.
The true cultural and culinary value of these foods does not necessarily reside in the endangered animal biomass. Rather, it resides in the unique biochemical transformation driven by the methodology and the associated microbiota. By deeply analyzing these heritage foods, scientists can decouple the signature flavor profile from the endangered raw material. Food scientists can then perform microbial heritage transfer by applying these exact indigenous microbes and processing methodologies to highly abundant and sustainable substrates. Through the use of the Bakasang consortia on sustainably harvested common mussels, researchers can achieve the same organoleptic experience and functional benefits as the original dish, while contributing to the conservation of delicate marine ecosystems that are at risk of overexploitation.
Marine fermentation is also a critical tool for the circular blue economy. The seafood industry generates millions of tons of highly polluting waste annually, particularly chitin-rich crustacean shells, heads, and cephalopod viscera.
Upcycling Shrimp Heads for Enhanced Flavor Profiles: Fermentation provides a pathway to upcycle Litopenaeus vannamei (Pacific white shrimp) head waste. Comparative metabolomic studies show that fermented shrimp head paste actually contains higher levels of crude protein and essential amino acids than paste made from whole shrimp. Furthermore, the microbial community in shrimp heads, dominated by Tetragenococcus and Alkalibacterium, drives the synthesis of pyrazines yielding rich, roasted, meaty flavors, whereas whole shrimp fermentation is dominated by simple aldehydes.28 This demonstrates that processing waste can yield a culinarily superior condiment.
Green Biorefinery of Shells: Fermentation provides a revolutionary tool to extract α-chitin from crustacean shells, a process that traditionally relies on harsh, environmentally hazardous chemicals. A breakthrough green biorefinery approach uses a two-stage successive microbial fermentation. An anaerobic fermentation using LAB produces lactic acid to demineralize the shells, followed by an aerobic step using the fungus Rhizopus oligosporus to produce acidic proteases that strip away proteins. This engineered succession leaves behind pure α-chitin, bio-calcium, and lactic acid, without the toxic environmental footprint of traditional chemical extractions.29
The advanced processing deviations developed to control marine invertebrate fermentations represent a robust toolkit of hazard-mitigation strategies that can be directly translated to broader industrial food processes. Table 1 summarizes these unique methodologies.
| Marine organism/product | Unique processing method | Target pathogen/harmful substance | Effectiveness and mechanism | Industrial cross-application potential |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shrimp (Terasi) | Two-Step Strain Fortification (Cladosporium and E. faecalis) | Biogenic Amines, Putrefaction | Targeted sequential inoculation maximizes proteolysis, accelerating fermentation to 16 days and lowering TVB-N.9 | Rapid Aging Protocols: Accelerating the aging of dry-cured meats or vegan cheeses using engineered fungal-bacterial successions. |
| Mussels (P. canaliculus) | Thermal-Pretreatment Fermentation and Commercial LAB Starter | Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium botulinum | Initial heat resets wild microflora; subsequent L. sakei inoculation produces bacteriocins (sakacin P), eliminating Listeria.13 | Plant-Based Seafood/Meats: Applying thermal resets prior to targeted fermentation to ensure absolute microbial safety in heavily processed plant-protein matrices. |
| Squid Viscera | Enzymatic Pretreatment and Multistrain Co-culturing | Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N), Spoilage flora | Protease pretreatment followed by B. tropicum and A. guillouiae competitively inhibits TVB-N accumulation while boosting amino acids.14 | Upcycling Abattoir Waste: Applying engineered multi-strain co-culturing to stabilize, deodorize, and valorize highly perishable terrestrial organ meats and by-products. |
| Pacific Oysters | Surface Sterilization and Targeted Consortia | Vibrio species, Endogenous marine pathogens | A defined microbial consortium comprised of S. cerevisiae, Kazachstania, and L. pentosus outcompetes wild pathogenic and spoilage bacteria.12 | Standardized Raw Ferments: Deploying functional microbial inoculants to safely ferment historically high-risk raw foods (e.g., raw milk cheeses). |
| Sea Urchin (Bekasang) | Botanical Antimicrobials (Starfruit Water) | Spoilage viruses, bacteria, and fungi | High concentrations of phenols and oxalates selectively suppress pathogens while allowing desired protease-producing bacteria to thrive.17 | Natural Hurdle Technologies: Integrating antimicrobial fruit/plant extracts into industrial ferments to replace synthetic nitrites and chemical preservatives. |
| Short-Neck Clams | Hydrostatic Pressure and TDS (Hurdle Tech) | Staphylococcus aureus, Psychrotrophic bacteria | Synergy of 300 MPa pressure and thiamine dilaurylsulfate (TDS) achieves a 4-log pathogen reduction without cooking.26 | Non-Thermal Sterilization: Applying pressure and TDS to heat-sensitive foods (e.g., fruit juices, raw-textured vegan products) for pathogen eradication without texture loss. |
| Eel/Fish Sauces | Anaerobic Atmospheric Control | Rancid short-chain fatty acids (e.g., n-butanoic acid) | Depriving the fermentation of oxygen suppresses lipid oxidation, shifting the volatile profile from rancid properties to sweet and mild profiles.20 | Controlled Atmosphere Fermentation: Utilizing vacuum or nitrogen-flushed fermentation tanks to actively suppress off-flavor oxidation in high-fat foods. |
Despite the great potential of engineered marine fermentations, many challenges remain for commercialization and acceptance by consumers. From the regulatory point of view, the use of non-traditional microbial starters in seafood matrices requires strict safety evaluations. Institutions such as the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) require these novel inoculants to reach the status of Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) or Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS). It is fundamental to demonstrate the absence of acquired antibiotic resistance genes and to ensure that these strains do not produce secondary toxins in marine fermentation conditions.
At the same time, consumer perception is a key factor. Upcycling waste streams such as squid guts or shrimp heads, which can be perceived negatively by consumers at first, is critical for the circular blue economy. Moreover, microbial heritage transfer, a huge advance in ecological preservation, confronts the traditional idea of food authenticity. Industry players need to invest in clear labeling and consumer education to transform the story from waste upcycling into premium, functional, and ecologically sound bio-gastronomy.
Fermentation of marine invertebrates, from crustaceans to bivalves, cephalopods, and echinoderms, is a vast and sophisticated branch of food science. Once viewed as a simple, spontaneous method of preservation, it has developed into a highly engineered, biologically accurate science. To overcome the unusual structural and microbiological challenges presented by marine organisms, modern food scientists and native producers alike use purposeful processing deviations such as enzymatic pretreatments, sequential strain fortifications, atmospheric controls, and full thermal resets. The potential is endless when these phylum-specific biotechnological processes are mastered. We can yield powerful functional compounds like GABA, ACE-inhibitory peptides, and highly bioavailable minerals; restructure myofibrillar proteins into novel 3D-printable gels; and naturally deodorize offensive marine volatiles. We can standardize safety by utilizing targeted consortia and synergistic hurdle technologies to curb biogenic amines, eradicate resilient environmental pathogens, and fundamentally reduce tropomyosin allergenicity. Most profoundly, by extracting the specific microbial consortia and processing methodologies of traditional ferments, we can practice microbial heritage transfer by decoupling cultural flavors from endangered species and applying these engineered successions to sustainable, alternative proteins across the wider food industry.30 Ultimately, the future of marine fermentation lies in the exact intersection of traditional ecological knowledge, multi-omics precision, and the sustainable principles of the circular blue economy.
During the preparation of this work, the authors utilized Google Gemini (Large Language Model) to assist with language editing, structuring, and formatting the manuscript to adhere to journal guidelines. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the accuracy and originality of the publication.
This work was supported by the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan - LPDP).
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| F1000Research | - | - |
|
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)