ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Binomial vs. Poisson distribution to determine the weekend effect on completed suicide.

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 21 May 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Objective

To compare weekday and weekend suicide frequency in Colombia using Binomial and Poisson distributions to evaluate the weekend effect.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted using public administrative records of completed suicides (CSs) from 2015 to 2023, analyzing personal, temporal, and geographic variables. The frequency of CSs on weekdays and weekends was measured by comparing proportions and daily rates using Binomial (π, 95% CI) and Poisson (λ, 95% CI) distribution models.

Results

A total of 23.544 CSs were analyzed; ~75% occurred during adulthood, ~80% occurred in men, and ~ 90% occurred in people with a high-school education or less. Although the weekend effect (WE) was not demonstrated over the nine-year period when applying the Binomial distribution, it was identified in four features: early adulthood, basic or high-school education, the Amazon geopolitical area, and common-law marital status (p < 0.05). Additionally, only five of the 33 departments showed a higher frequency of CSs on weekends (p < 0.05). Using the Poisson distribution, the WE was identified for each year of the study period, for 17 features (personal, temporal, and geographic variables), and for 16 departments (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The WE in CSs was easier to detect using the Poisson distribution. This methodology could support the reorganization of mental health services and could be applied to identify the WE in other health outcomes.

Keywords

Weekend effect; Epidemiologic studies; Suicide, completed; Poisson Distribution; Biostatistics.

Highlights

  • The Poisson distribution may reveal hidden public health problems masked by the Binomial distribution.

  • Identifying the weekend effect in the distribution of completed suicides is a strategic step toward reorganizing mental health services.

  • The methodology can be used to identify differential measurement bias in other public health issues.

Introduction

The occurrence of negative clinical and administrative outcomes in prehospital care, emergency departments, and hospitalizations is called the weekend effect (WE).1,2 The WE has been studied in the care of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, sepsis, and emergency surgeries, among others; however, there is little evidence regarding the WE in completed suicides (CS).13

CS is the third leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults. Approximately 727.000 CS occur worldwide each year, with an estimated rate of 9 per 100.000 people.4 In the Americas, the estimated annual rate is 6.2 per 100.000 people (65.000 CS). However, in Colombia, the rate increased from 4.6 to 6.0 (an increase of 30.4%) between 2011 and 2021.5,6

A multicenter study analyzing more than 1.7 million CSs between 1971 and 2019 showed a higher risk on weekends in Central and South American countries, South Africa, and Finland, compared with countries in North America, Europe, and Asia, where CS occurred mainly on Mondays and Wednesdays.7 In Colombia, ~25,000 CSs over eleven years were analyzed, and an average of 6.2 events per day was observed, increasing to 8 CS on holidays. Likewise, a higher risk of death was observed in the Eastern Plains, especially among young adults and older adults, as well as among residents of rural areas.8

As mentioned, the WE has been studied in cardiovascular emergencies, obstetric complications, and both general surgical and trauma-related emergencies. However, it has been shown that the maturation of trauma systems and the 24/7 model of care are health determinants that can significantly reduce the WE, especially in injuries from external causes, such as CS.1,2,7,911

CS events during the week (n/5 days) and at weekends (n/2 days) may follow a Poisson distribution (Poi(λ)), given that events occur in defined periods, in this case, asymmetric periods.12 In most studies, the statistical methods used to determine the WE in CS rely on logistic regression or comparisons of proportions using hypothesis tests for Binomial distributions (X ~ B(n, p)), and only rarely use multivariate methods or compare event frequency during the week and at weekends using Poi(λ).1,2,714

The impact of the WE was first recognized in the commercial sector, and, contrary to the health sector, the effect is positive, with increases in visits to shopping centers, sales, alcohol consumption, among other financial indicators.15,16 In response to the WE, the economic sector makes logistical, administrative, and operational adjustments to meet the demand for services. Conversely, such strategies are not commonly seen within the health sector. This is often due to a lack of research or evidence regarding the WE, financial limitations, constraints on care, and various other factors that influence the reorganization or modification of health service delivery.

This study compared the frequency of suicides during the week and at weekends, using Binomial and Poisson distributions, to show the WE in the occurrence of CS in Colombia. The results will serve as academic support for adjusting and reorganizing the distribution of mental health services.

Materials and methods

Design, place of collection, and patients

An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted using information from a public administrative database of confirmed suicides in Colombia between 2015 and 2023 (updated December 5, 2024; National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences [INMLCF]).17 Due to the study design, all records were analyzed, and those with missing information in the “day of the event” variable were excluded. The database did not contain information that could identify the deceased individuals.

Ethical considerations

The study adhered to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as Resolution 8430 of 1993 issued by the Colombian Ministry of Health. This is a retrospective, no-risk study based on a database review.18,19

Dataset, database, and variables

The database contained thirty-five sociodemographic variables related to the scene and context of suicide. However, ten variables were analyzed: five in the personal dimension (life cycle, gender, education, nationality, marital status), four in the temporal dimension (year, semester, quarter of occurrence, and time of the week [weekend, weekday]), and one in the location dimension (department). The variable “day of the event,” which indicated the day on which the suicide occurred, was transformed into “time of the week”: weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and weekdays (Monday to Friday). Additionally, the variable “department” was transformed into geopolitical regions (Andean, Caribbean, Pacific, Orinoco, Amazonian, Insular).

Statistical analysis

Qualitative variables were analyzed and presented as counts and proportions (95%, CI) (Binomial distribution, X ~ B(n, p)); In addition, the average number of occurrences on weekdays (n/5 days) and weekends (n/2 days) was calculated using a Poisson distribution (X ~ Poi(λ)).12

To compare the frequency (proportions, π) of suicides on weekends vs. weekdays using X ~ B(n, p), a one-sided hypothesis test (Z-test) was applied (Epidat Sergas, version 4.2):

  • H 0 : π1 – π2 ≤ 0 vs. H 1 : π1 – π2 > 0.

Likewise, to compare the frequency of suicides using X ~ Poi(λ), a one-sided hypothesis test (E-test) was applied20:

  • H 0 : λ1 - λ2 ≤ 0 vs. H 1 : λ1 - λ2 > 0.

The presence of the WE was established when comparing weekend and weekday frequencies with a p-value <0.05. Confidence interval plots (95%, CI) were used to compare the frequency of suicides on weekends and weekdays (X ~ B(n, p); X ~ Poi(λ)) by department within each geopolitical region.

Finally, to describe the relative excess of weekend versus weekday frequency, the ratio of frequencies was calculated using X ~ B(n, p) (π_weekend /π_weekday) and compared with the ratio obtained using X ~ Poi(λ) (λ_weekend/λ_weekday).

Results

General characteristics.

During the study period, there were 23.544 CS events. Thirty CS were excluded from the analysis due to missing information on the date of the CS (0.13%). The excluded CS occurred in 2015 and involved Colombian nationals. Most were men (n = 25/30) and adults (n = 18/30). Additionally, missing data were observed for the variables education (weekends: 16.0%; weekdays: 15.7%), geographic area (weekends: 0.013%; weekdays: 0.012%), nationality (weekends: 0.45%; weekdays: 0.39%), and marital status (weekends: 10.75%; weekdays: 10.33%). Therefore, analyses were performed using the subtotal for weekends and weekdays, excluding the missing absolute frequency within each category from the denominator ( Table 1).

Table 1. Frequency of suicides in Binomial distribution.

VariablesWeekendsWeekdaysP-Value
n: 7.497% (95%, CI)n: 16.017% (95%, CI)
Age, life cycle
 Early childhood40.05 (0.01–0.13)140.09 (0.04–0.14)0.811
 Middle childhood220.29 (0.18–0.44)420.26 (0.18–0.35)0.334
 Adolescence7129.50 (8.84–10.1)1.70810.7 (10.1–11.1)0.997
 Early adulthood2.40532.1 (31.0–33.1) 4.59628.7 (27.9–29.4)0.000
 Middle adulthood3.29544.0 (42.8–45.0)6.94543.4 (42.5–44.1)0.197
 Late adulthood1.05914.1 (13.3–14.9)2.71216.9 (16.3–17.5)1.000
Sex
 Male6.02680.4 (79.4–81.2)12.87780.4 (79.7–81.0)0.512
 Female1.47119.6 (18.7–20.5)3.14019.6 (18.9–20.2)0.488
Education
 Basic – High School5.58688.7 (87.9–89.5) 11.67386.5 (85.8–87.0)0.000
 Technical - Universitary4937.80 (7.18–8.52)1.2869.50 (9.03–10.0)1.000
 No schooling2163.40 (2.99–3.91)5384.00 (3.66–4.33)0.971
Nationality †††
 Colombian7.30497.9 (97.5–98.1)15.64198.0 (97.8–98.2)0.804
 Foreigner1592.13 (1.81–2.48)3131.96 (1.75–2.18)0.196
Marital status ††††
 Single3.49152.2 (50.9–53.3)7.60553.0 (52.1–53.7)0.855
 Common-law marriage1.83927.5 (26.4–28.5) 3.51524.5 (23.7–25.1)0.000
 Married90213.5 (12.6–14.3)2.15615.0 (14.4–15.6)0.998
 Separated, divorced3284.90 (4.39–5.44)7435.17 (4.81–5.54)0.798
 Widowed1251.87 (1.55–2.22)3222.24 (2.00–2.49)0.960
 Not applicable60.09 (0.03–0.19)200.14 (0.08–0.21)0.830
Years
 20156358.47 (7.84–9.12)1.4038.76 (8.32–9.20)0.769
 201675510.1 (9.39–10.7)1.5559.71 (9.25–10.1)0.192
 201780610.8 (10.0–11.4)1.76511.0 (10.5–11.5)0.731
 201886411.5 (10.8–12.2)1.83211.4 (10.9–11.9)0.423
 201982111.0 (10.2–11.6)1.82211.4 (10.8–11.8)0.831
 202076710.2 (9.55–10.9)1.65310.3 (9.85–10.8)0.583
 202184411.3 (10.5–11.9)1.84511.5 (11.0–12.0)0.721
 202297713.0 (12.2–13.8)1.97512.3 (11.8–12.8)0.065
 20231.02813.7 (12.9–14.5)2.16713.5 (13.0–14.0)0.352
Semiannually periods
 January–June 3.67749.0 (47.9–50.1)7.96949.8 (48.9–50.5)0.844
 July–December 3.82051.0 (49.8–52.0)8.04850.2 (49.4–51.0)0.156
Quarter of the year
 January – March 1.81724.2 (23.2–25.2)3.89124.3 (23.6–24.9)0.538
 April – June 1.86024.8 (23.8–25.8)4.07825.5 (24.7–26.1)0.858
 July – September 1.89925.3 (24.3–26.3)3.97424.8 (24.1–25.4)0.196
 October–December 1.92125.6 (24.6–26.6)4.07425.4 (24.7–26.1)0.379
Geographical area ††
 Andean4.67062.3 (61.1–63.3)10.15063.4 (62.6–64.1)0.945
 Caribbean1.12014.9 (14.1–15.7)2.41615.1 (14.5–15.6)0.614
 Pacific1.16015.5 (14.6–16.3)2.37314.8 (14.2–15.3)0.094
 Orinoco3344.46 (4.00–4.94)6994.36 (4.05–4.69)0.375
 Amazon2082.77 (2.41–3.17) 3632.27 (2.04–2.50)0.009
 Insular40.05 (0.01–0.13)140.09 (0.04–0.14)0.811

Education: weekends 6,295, weekdays 13,497;

†† Geographical area: weekends 7,496, weekdays 16,015,

††† Nationality: weekends 7,463, weekdays 15,954,

†††† Marital status: weekends 6,691, weekdays 14,361. Traits with notable differences are shaded in gray.

In general, the annual frequency of CS increased progressively, with the lowest and highest numbers of suicides occurring in 2015 and 2023, respectively. The semiannual and quarterly distributions were symmetrical ( Table 1). Three out of four CS events occurred during adulthood, at least 80% occurred in men, and approximately 90% occurred in people with a high-school education or less. More than half of the cases were single, and one in four were in a common-law relationship. Additionally, most CS involved Colombian nationals, and approximately two-thirds occurred in departments in the Andean region, particularly in Antioquia and Bogotá ( Table 1, Table S1).

Suicide frequencies: Binomial vs. Poisson distribution.

Tables 1 and S1 compare the frequencies of CS on weekends and weekdays using a Binomial distribution (X ~ B(n, p)). Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in CS frequencies between weekdays and weekends over the nine years analyzed. Among the variables evaluated, four characteristics showed a higher frequency of CS on weekends: early adulthood, basic or high-school education, the Amazon region, and common-law marital status (p < 0.05). In addition, only 5 of 33 departments showed a higher frequency of CS on weekends (Fig. 1).

5ccdbc1a-e93e-47d9-9a4f-ae978ee1fb7d_figure1.gif

Fig. 1. Geographical Binomial suicide distribution.

Each table (Fig. 1a to Fig. 1f) shows the frequency (%, 95%, CI) of suicides on weekends and weekdays in the six geopolitical regions of Colombia. The departments are found by the abbreviations of the ISO-3166 system. Statistical differences between weekends and weekdays are identified with asterisks (P-Value <0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***) and the absence of statistical differences with ns (not significant).

Tables 2 and S2 compare the frequencies of CS on weekends and weekdays using a Poisson distribution (X ~ Poi(λ)). For each year of the study period, the average number of CS per day on weekends (λweekends) was higher than the average number of CS per day on weekdays (λweekdays). Additionally, across the other dimensions analyzed, 17 characteristics showed higher λ_weekend than λweekdays (p < 0.05). Likewise, λweekends was higher in 16 of 33 departments (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Table 2. Frequency of suicides in Poisson distribution.

VariablesWeekendsWeekdaysP-Value
n: 3748.5λ (95%, CI)n: 3203.4λ (95%, CI)
Age, life cycle
Early childhood2.000.50–5.102.801.50–4.700.380
Middle childhood11.06.90–16.708.406.10–11.40.185
Adolescence356.0330.3–383.1341.6325.6–358.20.185
Early adulthood1020.51154.9–1251.5919.2892.8–946.20.001
Middle adulthood1647.51591.7–1704.71389.01356.5–1422.10.001
Late adulthood529.5498.1–562.4542.4522.2–563.20.260
Sex
Male3013.02937.4–3090.12575.42531.1–2620.30.001
Female735.5698.4–774.1628.0606.2–650.40.001
Education
Basic – High school2793.02720.2–2867.22334.62292.4–2377.30.001
Technical - Universitary108.094.1–123.4107.698.7–117.10.495
Technical secondary246.5225.2–269.3257.2243.3–271.70.220
Nationality
Colombian3652.03568.7–3736.73128.23079.4–3177.60.001
Foreigner79.567.6–92.962.655.9–69.90.008
Marital status
Single1745.51688.1–1804.41521.01487–1555.60.001
Common-law marriage919.5878.0–962.5703.0679.9–726.60.001
Married451.0422.0–481.4431.2413.2–449.80.135
Separated, divorced164.0146.7–182.7148.6138.1–159.70.075
Widowed62.552.0–74.564.457.6–71.80.410
Not applicable3.001.10–6.504.002.40–6.200.355
Years
2015317.5293.3–343.2280.6266.1–295.70.005
2016377.5351.0–405.4311.0295.7–326.90.001
2017403.0375.7–431.8353.0336.7–369.90.001
2018432.0403.7–461.8366.4349.8–383.60.001
2019410.5382.9–439.6364.4347.9–381.50.002
2020383.5356.8–411.6330.6314.9–346.90.001
2021422.0394.0–451.5369.0352.4–386.20.001
2022488.5458.3–520.1395.0377.8–412.80.001
2023514.0483.1–546.4433.4415.3–452.00.001
Semiannually periods
January–June 1838.51779.6–1898.91593.81559.0–1629.20.001
July–December 1910.01849.9–1971.51609.61574.6–1645.20.001
Quarter of the year
January – March 908.5867.2–951.3778.2753.9–803.00.001
April – June 930.0888.2–973.2815.6790.8–840.00.001
July – September 949.5907.3–993.2794.8770.3–819.90.001
October–December 960.5918.0–1004.4814.8790.0–840.20.001
Geographical region
Andean2335.02268.5–2402.92030.01990.7–2069.90.001
Pacific580.0547.1–614.4474.6455.7–494.10.001
Caribbean560.0527.7–593.8483.2464.1–502.90.001
Orinoco167.0149.6–185.9139.8129.6–150.60.004
Amazon104.090.3–119.172.665.3–80.50.001
Insular2.000.50–5.102.801.50–4.700.380
5ccdbc1a-e93e-47d9-9a4f-ae978ee1fb7d_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Geographical Poisson suicide distribution.

Each table (Fig. 2a to Fig. 2f) shows the average number of suicides per day (λ, 95%, CI) on weekends and weekdays in the six geopolitical regions of Colombia. The departments are found by the abbreviations of the ISO-3166 system. Statistical differences between weekends and weekdays are identified with asterisks (P-Value <0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***) and the absence of statistical differences with ns (not significant).

Finally, Figure 3 shows the CS frequency ratio calculated using the Binomial (πweekends /πweekdays) and Poisson (λweekends/λweekdays) approaches to highlight the relative excess of CS in these two periods. Overall, and across each characteristic analyzed within the person, time, and place dimensions, the relative excess of CS estimated using the Poisson approach was greater than that estimated using the Binomial approach.

5ccdbc1a-e93e-47d9-9a4f-ae978ee1fb7d_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Relative excesses of suicides on weekends and weekdays.

The figure shows the suicide frequency rate calculated using Binomial distribution (light blue bars, πweekends /πweekdays) and Poisson distribution (black bars, λweekends/λweekdays), according to the characteristics analyzed in the dimensions of time, person, and place. On the far left, at the beginning, the global rate is highlighted in gray.

Discussion

Using an analytical cross-sectional design and administrative data from the INMLCF, we demonstrated the usefulness of the Poisson distribution compared with the Binomial distribution to confirm the presence of the WE in CS events that occurred over nine years in Colombia.

Over the past three five-year periods, Colombia has faced socioeconomic challenges that may explain the progressive increase in CS frequency. One of these was the 2014 economic crisis, which significantly increased unemployment; in the most affected departments, the frequency of CS rose by approximately 50%.21 Additionally, between 2016 and 2018, two out of three CS were related to domestic disputes or family crises, and 12% were related to economic problems.22

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, CS frequency also increased, partly due to the effects of social isolation, such as anxiety, depression, domestic violence, and reduced access to mental health services. It is important to note that “social isolation” was often a misinterpretation of “physical distancing,” a non-pharmacological measure designed to minimize person-to-person transmission.23,24

Reports suggest that mental health services often face serious problems on weekends, including insufficient specialized staff for psychiatric emergencies and administrative hurdles that limit access to necessary medications.7,25 In Colombia, these weekend access barriers have not been studied; however, increased alcohol consumption has been reported during this time, often combined with other psychoactive substances that may induce agitation, impulsivity, and impaired judgment-conditions that can contribute to interpersonal and intrafamilial violence.26,27

Interpersonal and domestic violence are acute stressors that may increase the risk of CS on weekends. For example, in Colombia, 35% of CSs are associated with alcohol consumption, 20% with other psychoactive drugs, and 12% occur after episodes of domestic violence or aggression, particularly on weekends.26,28,29

In addition to the findings reported here, recent studies in various countries agree that the occurrence of suicides varies significantly by day of the week and contextual conditions associated with free time, leisure, or reduced institutional support. In Japan, Australia, and the United States, there has been a significant increase in suicides during weekends and holidays, a phenomenon that has been particularly marked in young age groups and working-age adults, with findings similar to those observed in this study.30 These patterns reinforce the hypothesis that the temporal structure of the week includes changes in routine, less work or formal supervision, greater availability of alcohol, and reduced access to health services modulate suicide risk.

In Latin American countries, several studies confirm this trend. In Peru, Roman-Lazarte et al. reported marked variations by department and documented a significant increase in suicides on Sundays, similar to that observed in Colombia and Brazil.8,31 In Argentina, Leveau et al. showed that social fragmentation increases suicide risk.32 In Mexico, Borges et al. found a predominance of CS associated with acute alcohol consumption during weekends, especially among young men, highlighting the role of impulsivity and disinhibition in suicidal behavior.26,27,33 Similarly, the combined use of alcohol and psychoactive substances increases the likelihood of a suicide attempt six- to eightfold.34,35 These findings are consistent with the results of this research and with Colombian reports in which alcohol consumption is related to about one-third of suicides and increases markedly on weekends.28

Furthermore, accumulated evidence suggests that the lack of mental health services with effective weekend coverage worsens this phenomenon. Studies in the United Kingdom, Canada, and South Korea have shown that suicide mortality is lower in regions with 24/7 community mental health services or crisis hotlines staffed by specialized clinical personnel. These interventions have reduced suicides related to periods of low care availability by 15% to 22%, supporting the need to reorganize service provision according to temporal patterns of risk.3,36,37

Finally, methodological evidence is also consistent with our findings. In analyses of rare events occurring independently over time, the Poisson distribution can provide more stable and sensitive estimates than the Binomial approach or simple proportional comparisons. Statistical studies in the temporal epidemiology of CS indicate that Poisson methods, or extensions such as multivariate Poisson models or Poisson regression with offsets, may better capture relative increases on specific days, particularly when the time windows are asymmetric, as in comparisons of two weekend days versus five weekdays.38

In conclusion, the Poisson distribution detected the weekend effect in CS more clearly than the Binomial distribution. The relative excess of suicides on weekends was more evident when analyzed using Poisson methods. These findings suggest that reorganizing mental health services according to temporal risk patterns could improve responsiveness to weekend demand.

Ethics approval statement

Because the database was anonymized and data were obtained retrospectively, this research was classified as “without risk” and approved by the local ethical regulation in force by the Research Committee of the Juan N. Corpas University Foundation.

Patient consent statement

Not applicable.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources

Not applicable.

Clinical trial registration

Not applicable.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 May 2026
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Teherán AA, Pombo LM, Camero-Ramos G et al. Binomial vs. Poisson distribution to determine the weekend effect on completed suicide. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2026, 15:774 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179610.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 21 May 2026
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.