ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Paediatric Diabetes and Dry Eye: A Review

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 12 Jun 2026
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

This article is included in the Eye Health gateway.

This article is included in the Global Public Health gateway.

Abstract

Background

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a set of complex metabolic diseases associated with defects in insulin secretion and/or insulin efficacy, resulting in chronic hyperglycemia. It is known to be one of the most common chronic disorders amongst paediatric patients today. Dry eye disease is a multifactorial disorder of the preocular surface which is defined by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film. While DED is well documented in adults with diabetes, its occurrence and associated ocular surface changes in children are less clearly understood. This review aimed to collate evidence on the prevalence of dry eye and related ocular surface alterations in paediatric patients with DM.

Methods

A literature review was conducted using current peer-reviewed scientific articles sourced from online databases. Studies were included if they reported on dry eye prevalence and/or ocular surface changes in children diagnosed with DM. Relevant findings were extracted and synthesised to identify common trends and clinical implications.

Results

The reviewed literature indicated that paediatric patients with DM may exhibit a range of ocular surface changes, including reduced tear production, tear film instability and meibomian gland dysfunction. Several studies reported a higher prevalence of dry eye signs and symptoms in diabetic children compared to non-diabetic controls. These alterations are likely associated with metabolic dysregulation and microvascular changes affecting the lacrimal functional unit.

Conclusions

Evidence suggests that dry eye disease and related ocular surface abnormalities can occur in children with diabetes. Healthcare practitioners dealing with diabetic children should be aware of diabetic-related ocular changes. Early diagnosis and management are vital as this prevents the possibility of secondary ocular surface complications that may further cause patient discomfort.

Keywords

Dry eye, diabetes, paediatric patients, ocular surface changes, children

Tears spread over the anterior ocular surface forming a protective interface between the epithelium and the external environment.1 Previously, the tear film was known for comprising of three layers viz. the lipid layer, aqueous layer and the mucin layer. However, recent evidence has shown that the mucin and aqueous layers merge, due to the decreasing gradient of concentration elicited by the mucin layer, giving rise to a single layer known as the mucous-aqueous layer.2 The superficial lipid layer comprises of substances secreted by the meibomian glands which aid in providing stability to the tear film by increasing surface tension.3 This protects the tear film against gravity, ensuring optimum ocular protection as well as decreases the rate at which tears evaporate from the surface. Majority of the tear film is comprised of the muco-aqueous layer, which lies below and to an extent is interspersed with the lipid layer.4 The aqueous layer is secreted by the lacrimal gland which is found in the superior temporal angle of the orbit, consisting of two parts, the palpebral and orbital lobes. This layer of the tear film consists of electrolytes, to maintain tear osmolarity, ions which are vital for epithelial integrity as well as proteins which are responsible for various actions such as wetting of the ocular surface, reducing surface tension as well as providing protection against infectious agents.5 The mucin layer is made up of mucin, immunoglobulins, urea, salts, glucose, leukocytes, cellular debris, and enzymes, primarily secreted by the goblet cells of the conjunctiva. This layer provides lubrication as well as protection to the cornea while anchoring the aqueous tear film to the corneal epithelium. It also helps to prevent desiccation of the ocular surface and infections.6

2.1. Diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) can be defined as a biomedical disorder, resulting from either the inability of insulin to perform its normal functions or a decreased insulin secretion, at times both concurrently.7 Consequently, glucose accumulates in the bloodstream and if left untreated, results in various secondary health complications. Loss of weight, frequent urinating, excessive thirst and visual disturbances are among the most frequently reported symptoms of diabetes.8 Studies show that in the years, 2016 and 2017, diabetes was listed as being the second most common underlying cause of death in South Africa. Recent statistics showed that the number of people with diabetes globally has risen from 108 000 000 in 1980 to 463 000 000 in 2019. South Africa alone, has seen a rapid escalation in the number of people diagnosed with diabetes, where it has almost tripled from approximately 4.5% in 2010 to 12.7% in 2019.9

2.2. Paediatric DM

The detrimental impact of diabetes in children and young adults has been researched quite extensively, yet the prevalence of diabetes as a chronic condition amongst this population 41continues to increase.10 The diagnosis of diabetes, more specifically type 1 diabetes (T1D), peaks during adolescence with approximately 1 100 000 children below the age of 20 living with T1D globally. It is known to be the second most prevalent chronic condition in children. Providing optimal care for children and adolescents diagnosed with diabetes mellitus demands a multidisciplinary approach comprising of a group of healthcare professionals who acknowledge the skill and expertise of each member.11 Timeous intervention and correct management are vital as the condition is known to lead to a vast number of secondary complications, which include microvascular or cardiovascular disease, blindness, limb amputations12 and even death.

2.3. Dry eye disease

In recent years, dry eye disease (DED) has fast become a common global concern among the general population. Dry eye syndrome is a generic ocular surface disorder characterized by the loss of homeostasis of the tear film, accompanied by a variety of symptoms, in which tear film hyperosmolarity and instability, inflammation or damage of the ocular surface as well as neurosensory abnormalities may play etiological roles. DED is closely associated with a reduced ability to perform certain activities such as reading, driving, and computer related work, tasks that require visual attention.13 Lack of sufficient tears can leave the interpalpebral ocular surface susceptible to damage, affecting the quality of life of these patients.14

Aqueous-deficient dry eye

This form of dry eye usually presents as a result of decreased aqueous production by the lacrimal gland.15 This group can be broken down further into Sjogren and Non-Sjogren related.

Evaporative dry eye

Evaporative dry eye usually presents with a meibomian gland dysfunction resulting in an insufficient lipid layer production which allows for increased rates of tear evaporation from the ocular surface. Most patients usually present with this type of dry eye.16 Based on the signs and symptoms upon evaluation, evaporative dry eye can be classified as being either intrinsic or extrinsic.15

2.4 Pathophysiology of diabetes-related dry eye

Chronically elevated blood glucose levels, peripheral neuropathy, reduced insulin production, and systemic hyperosmotic changes are among the known risk factors for dry eye in diabetic patients. Proliferation of the corneal epithelial cells and acinar lacrimal gland requires insulin. It has been shown that hyperglycemia causes histological changes within the lacrimal gland which indicates the diabetic-induced oxidative stress plays a vital role in the development of dry eye in the diabetic population.12 Fluctuating glucose and insulin levels have direct and indirect implications on the structure as well as metabolism of the corneal epithelium itself. Hence, hyperglycemia changes the expressions of growth factors and mediators resulting in disruption in cell growth and integrity.17 These alterations impair tear flow and production, leaving the ocular surface susceptible to many ocular conditions such as, dry eye syndrome. The true pathogenesis however, still remains elusive with a limited number of management approaches made available.18

2.5. Methods

This integrative search was conducted on online databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and PubMed with the aim of identifying available evidence in current literature on the prevalence of dry eye in children with diabetes mellitus (type 1/2) as well as to document any ocular surfaces changes in these patients. The guiding question to elaborate the review was: “What scientific knowledge has been produced thus far on the prevalence of dry eye syndrome among children with diabetes?”

All relevant literature documenting tear film changes and the prevalence of dry eye syndrome in children and adolescents living with diabetes, were included and summarised. The final sample comprised of six articles.

2.6. Review

The findings of the search are categorized accordingly and presented along with a short description on tear film osmolarity, tear break-up time, Schirmer, dry eye signs and symptoms, and the prevalence of dry eye syndrome amongst paediatric patients diagnosed with DM.

2.6.1. Tear film osmolarity

Tear film osmolarity is regarded as being hallmark pathogenic component in patients diagnosed with dry eye. Therefore, tear osmolarity testing and measurements were regarded as being the “gold standard” for diagnosing dry eye. A device known as an Osmometer is utilized to assess tear osmolarity by taking a measurement of the electrical impedance.19 A cross-sectional study comparing the tear film osmolarity (TFO) as well as the results of other dry eye tests between younger patients with diabetes and normal, healthy children revealed a significantly higher tear film osmolarity in the cohort of children with diabetes mellitus.20

2.6.2. Tear break-up time (TBUT) test

One of the most utilized tear function tests used to assess the stability of the tear film itself. A drop of unpreserved fluorescein is instilled in the eye and a slit lamp with a cobalt blue filter is used to evaluate the ocular surface. The patient is required to perform a full blink action and thereafter to avoid blinking again. The time immediately after the blink to the first tear break-up is recorded as the tear break-up time. The normal range varies between 20 and 30 seconds while values below 10 seconds are regarded as being pathological.21 A study by Akinci et al22 revealed that the Tear Break-Up Time test results were significantly lower in patients with a longer duration of diabetes. Studies carried out by Wang et al, 23 Inanc et al24 and Essuman et al25 reported similar findings. However, a study by Akil et al26 found that there was no statistically significant difference between the Tear Break- up Time (p = 0.182) of the diabetic and non-diabetic groups.

2.6.3. Schirmer test

The Schirmer test is a diagnostic test widely used in clinical practice to assess tear volumes. Schirmer I test, performed without the use of any anaesthesia, allows one to measure both the basal and reflex tears whilst Schirmer II test, measures basal secretion of tears only due to the use of a topical anaesthetic which inhibits reflex tearing.26 In 2007, a study conducted by Akinci et al22 showed that the Schirmer test results of the diabetic group were significantly lower than the controls. Furthermore, they found that the lower values were found amongst patients with more than 10 years duration of T1D. Other diabetic ocular surface studies20,26,24 support the findings of Akinci et al.22 These studies; however, used Schirmer test I - which included the use of a topical anaesthesia (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride) to obtain basal tear secretion rates only. Gunay et al20 found a significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic Schirmer test scores, 16.7 ± 5.1 mm and 23 ± 5.6 mm respectively. Mean test scores from the study by Akil et al26 showed 15.5 ± 3.9 mm for the diabetic group and 19.8 ± 3.9 mm for the controls. Inanc et al24 reported similar findings; 12.09 ± 5.37 mm for the diabetics and 15.09 ± 4.01 mm for the control group resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). However, a study by Wang et al23 using the Schirmer test I showed no statistically significant difference between the results of the two groups.

2.6.4. Presence of dry eye signs and symptoms

Dry eye syndrome is commonly associated with ocular irritation or discomfort which could present in the following ways: foreign body sensation (FBS), burning, itching, sensitivity to light (photophobia), conjunctival discharge or luster, erythema and dryness of the bulbar conjunctiva.22 There are various dry eye questionnaires available and commonly used in clinical practice to assess different factors linked to dry eye syndrome, subjectively. These questionnaires are often scored based on the patient’s responses. A study22 found that the scores for dry eye symptoms were significantly higher in the diabetic group as compared to the healthy non-diabetic group. The study also found that there was no statistically significant difference between the scores for dry eye signs for the two groups however dry eye signs were found in eight diabetic children vs one control. Wang et al23 found 13 diabetic children out of a total of 38 with ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores above the norm. However, another study24 reported that there was no statistically significant difference between the OSDI scores of the study and control groups.

2.6.5. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome

Sparse literature is available on the prevalence of dry eye syndrome in children with diabetes. Whilst most studies thus far included dry eye tests, very few reached a definite dry eye diagnosis. A study by Akinci et al, 22 found that 7.7% of the diabetic population had a definite dry eye diagnosis and 0.96% had a probable diagnosis whilst none were found amongst the controls. Wang et al23 found that the prevalence of dry eye syndrome was significantly higher in the diabetic group as compared to the non-diabetic group. This differed from the results of a study carried out by Akil et al26 which reported that none of the participants were found to have dry eye, based on the Tear Break-Up Time and Schirmer test scores.

2.7. Discussion

DM is a set of complex metabolic diseases associated with defects in insulin secretion and/or insulin efficacy, resulting in chronic hyperglycaemia.27 It is known to be one of the most common chronic disorders amongst paediatric patients today.28 According to the International Diabetes Federation, 370 000 000 people globally, were diagnosed with diabetes by the year 2011.This number was predicted to reach approximately 550 000 000 by 2030. Research studies have shown that at least 80% of the diabetic population were from developing countries. By 2017, the total number of children and adolescents, across the world, living with diabetes reached 1 106 500.29 Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder of the preocular surface which is defined by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film.30 The dysfunction may result in one or more both layers of the tear film, namely, the lipid layer and the muco-aqueous layer.4 Poor quality of the tear film or a deficiency in tear production, results in the instability of the tear film itself, allowing for excessive evaporation of tears from the surface of the eye. Numerous studies have reported that diabetes is closely linked to an increased risk of developing chronic complications. With regards to the eye itself, patients may develop ocular surface diseases such as dry eye or keratopathy, retinopathy, glaucoma, cataract, refractive abnormalities, all of which could result in a decrease in visual acuity and if not managed effectively, could lead to blindness.22 Tear function may also be reduced in diabetic patients due to either, the impairment of the autonomic nervous system or damage to the lacrimal gland’s microvasculature.30 Anecdotal evidence suggest that older patients are said to be more prone to developing dry eye syndrome mainly due to the anatomy of the eye and the process of aging. However, patients regardless of age with systemic conditions such as diabetes, are at an increased risk and require timeous intervention. By the age of 10, annual ocular screenings are recommended for all patients diagnosed with DM.24

The studies introduced in the present review suggest that diabetes may lead to various ocular surface alterations, even in children. Whilst most literature aimed to merely show certain tear film changes; two studies22,23 attempted to clinically diagnose dry eye syndrome and showed a higher prevalence in children with diabetes. Therefore, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the presence of dry eye in children with diabetes, in different geographical locations. In this review, we found that literature on tear film osmolarity in this diabetic population is limited to just one study which showed that tear film osmolarity is generally higher in patients with diabetes. Dry eye may result from an interruption in the flex pathways of tears or a process which affects the lacrimal gland itself, altering the secretion mechanisms. Diabetes presents with a possibility of damage to the lacrimal gland’s microvasculature and along with autonomic neuropathy, the lacrimal gland does not function at its optimum. Diabetic sensory neuropathy, which affects the corneal surface may be the cause of decreased tear secretion.24 Four22,23,24,25 out of the six studies reviewed, showed that tear break-up time test values were significantly lower among children with DM as compared to the healthy controls.

2.8. Conclusion

Evidence of this review shows that tear film changes among diabetic children may vary. Future studies should assess ocular changes in different parts of the world, as geographics, climate and environment may influence normative tear test values. Due to the limited literature available regarding the prevalence of dry eye and tear osmolarity values in this specific population, it is recommended that more studies are conducted. Poor regulation of insulin and glucose can result in fluctuation of vision as well as place diabetic patients at an increased risk of ocular surface inflammation. With the steady increase in the number of children and adolescents with diabetes, the characteristics and risk factors of dry eye disease in this population has become more valuable and of social significance. Early detection of systemic conditions may allow eye care practitioners to be more proactive in ensuring appropriate referral and intervention which is vital as this can aid in reducing the risk of blindness as well as other diabetes-related morbidities. At present, a large majority of the literature focuses on the prevalence and factors associated with dry eye disease in adults with diabetes, but very few studies have been performed on children with diabetes. Future studies should include the paediatric population, including adolescents to provide a broader understanding on diabetic-related ocular surfaces alterations. Information obtained from these studies will be beneficial to the eye care practitioners around the world, by enhancing physician awareness of dry eye in children.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 Jun 2026
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Bisetty S and Ebrahim Khan N. Paediatric Diabetes and Dry Eye: A Review [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. F1000Research 2026, 15:918 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.180152.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 12 Jun 2026
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.