Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during activation of T helper cells

Jing Cheng; Lawrence P Kane

doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v1

Home Browse Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during...

ALL Metrics

-

Views

-

Downloads

Get PDF

Get XML

Export

▬

✚

Research Article

Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during activation of T helper cells

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Jing Cheng¹, Lawrence P Kane ¹

PUBLISHED 15 Apr 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA

OPEN PEER REVIEW

REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that Akt differentially modulated a subset of NF-kB target genes during T cell activation. In the current study, we further explored the broader effects of Akt inhibition on T cell gene induction. Global microarray analysis was used to characterize T helper cell transcriptional responses following antigen receptor stimulation in the absence or presence of Akti1/2 (an allosteric inhibitor which targets Akt1 and Akt2), to identify novel targets dependent upon Akt and obtain a more comprehensive view of Akt-sensitive genes in T helper cells. Pathway analysis of microarray data from a CD4⁺ T cell line revealed effects on gene networks involving ribosomal and T cell receptor signaling pathways associated with Akti1/2 treatment. Using real-time PCR analysis, we validated differential regulation of several genes in these pathways, including Ier3, Il13, Klf6, Egr1, Ccl1 and Ccl4, among others. Additionally, transcription factor target gene (TFactS) analysis revealed that NF-kB and Myc were the most significantly enriched transcription factors among Akt-dependent genes after T cell receptor and CD28 stimulation. Akt activation elicited increases in the enrichment of NF-kB- and Myc-targeted genes. The present study has identified a diverse set of genes, and possible mechanisms for their regulation, that are dependent on Akt during T cell activation.

Keywords

T helper cell; global microarray analysis; allosteric inhibitor; TFactS; CD28; CD3; Akt; NF-kB

Corresponding author: Lawrence P Kane

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information: This work was supported by grant GM080398 from the NIH/NIGMS to LPK.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright: © 2013 Cheng J and Kane LP. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

How to cite: Cheng J and Kane LP. Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during activation of T helper cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2013, 2:109 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v1) First published: 15 Apr 2013, 2:109 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v1) Latest published: 15 May 2013, 2:109 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v2)

Introduction

Mapping global changes in gene expression has proven extremely useful in revealing previously unappreciated connections between groups of expressed genes and biological events, such as development and tumorigenesis. We have previously studied the role of the Akt kinase in T cells, and showed that a subset of NF-κB-dependent genes required Akt for optimal upregulation during T cell activation¹. However, the gene expression program controlled by Akt signaling in activated T cells has not been elucidated. Although studies of individual transcription factors and their target genes have elucidated several aspects of Akt signaling^2,3, understanding the overall program of transcriptional regulation controlled by the Akt pathway requires global expression analysis. We used global expression profiling to identify genes whose induction is dependent on Akt. A study from the Cantrell lab⁴ concluded that the chief role of Akt in CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells is to control the transcriptional programs that direct effector versus memory cell fate. However, Akt may not have the same role in all T cell subpopulations. For example, constitutively active Akt can stimulate cell growth and survival of CD4⁺ T cells but not CD8⁺ T cells^5,6.

In the current study, we tested the effects of a selective, allosteric inhibitor of Akt 1 and 2 (Akti1/2)^7–10 on activated T cells and further explored potential mechanism of action of Akt, by performing network analysis of gene expression data and validating the expression changes of selected genes by real-time qPCR analysis. Our findings demonstrate that Akt inhibition by Akti1/2 significantly affects ribosomal protein expression and the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. Asthma and the antigen receptor signaling pathways were most affected by Akti1/2 in activated T cells. Moreover, Akt inhibition can decrease the enrichment of NF-κB- and Myc-targeted genes. These effects may contribute to the functions of dysregulated Akt activation in tumorigenesis, as well as in normal T cell activation and development⁶.

The importance of Akt for T cell activation and transformation led us to explore the underlying pathways and mechanisms (or target genes and downstream cellular pathways) by a genome-wide gene expression profiling approach. Therefore the aims of the present study were to (1) identify, at the genome-wide level, the genes that are differentially expressed in activated T helper cells, with or without Akt inhibition and (2) conduct bioinformatics analyses to identify the pathways and possible mechanisms involved.

Materials and methods

Antibodies and reagents

Biotin-anti-mCD28 (37.51) and biotin-anti-mCD3ε (145-2C11) were obtained from BD-Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Streptavidin was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) and Akti1/2 was from EMD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). rhIL-2 was obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH (Cat.#136 from Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.).

T cells

The D10 T cell line, a fast-growing variant of the D10.G41 murine Th2 T cell clone^11–13 was maintained in RPMI 1640 media (Mediatech, Manassas, VA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated bovine growth serum (BGS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Lonza, Walkersville, MD), 2 mM l-glutamine, 50 µM 2-ME, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech, Manassas, VA) and 25 IU/ml rhIL-2.

RNA extraction and microarray gene expression profiling

D10 T cells were left untreated or pretreated with 10 µM Akti1/2 for 1 h and then stimulated with biotinylated anti-mCD3/CD28 and streptavidin for 0, 2, 6 and 12 hrs. RNA extraction was performed using a commercially available kit (RNeasy, Qiagen, Frederick, MD) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. RNA quality was confirmed based on a RNA integrity number >8 by use of the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The microarray analysis was performed by Genomics and Proteomics Core Laboratories (GPCL) of the University of Pittsburgh, USA. An Illumina mouse RefSeq8 chip was used. Microarray data have been deposited in the GEO database and are accessible through the GEO series accession number GSE45221.

Statistical analysis of gene expression microarray data

To compare the molecular characteristics between different time points, Automated Efficiency Analysis was first performed using 7 transformation methods, 9 normalization methods and 5 tests for differentially expressed genes¹⁴. A global normalization method and the J5_Quantile95_None method were applied on each time point. The differentially expressed genes were identified using caGEDA with a reasonable threshold of J5 for each time point¹⁵. To survey the spectrum of biological functions within genes, which were differentially expressed between different groups, functional classification of the genes were performed using Pathway Express (a pathway level Impact Analysis as described by Draghici et al., 2007¹⁶). Pathway Express was designed to provide both statistical and biological significance in the indication of which pathways may be affected by the observed changes in gene expression. The results are summarized as Impact scores and p-values. Pathway-Express orders the affected pathways in the decreasing order of their expected importance for the given condition.

Real-time PCR analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the ABI StepOnePlus Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as described previously¹. Amplification was performed on a cDNA amount equivalent to 25 ng total RNA with 1×SYBR green universal PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems) containing deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, MgCl₂, AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, and forward and reverse primers. Specific primers for each gene were purchased from SABiosciences (Qiagen, Frederick, MD). Experimental samples and no-template controls were all run in duplicate. The PCR cycling parameters were: 95°C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 94°C for 15s, 60°C for 1 min. The amount of cDNA in each sample was calculated by the comparative threshold (Ct) method and expressed as 2exp(Ct) using 18S RNA as an internal control. Statistical significance was determined using the Student’s T test. All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA).

Enrichment in transcription factor target gene analysis

TFactS was used to predict the activities of transcription factors in our microarray data¹⁷. The lists of up- and down-regulated genes were compared to a list of curated target gene signatures. The nominal p-value (Pval) represents the risk of a false positive for a single test. Since the list of query genes is systematically compared to each target gene signature, a multi-testing condition is required. The e-value (Eval) represents the expected number of false positives for a given nominal value. It is computed using the formula: Eval=Pval*T, where T is the number of tests.

Results

Identification of genes regulated by Akt signaling in activated CD4⁺ T cells

We previously demonstrated that Akt activity was rapidly inhibited in T cells by addition of the allosteric inhibitor Akti1/2, which inhibited phosphorylation of Akt within one minute, an effect that can last as long as twelve hours¹. In the present study, microarray analysis was performed at three different time points after CD3/CD28 stimulation to characterize the effects of Akt inhibition on the T cell gene activation program in helper T cells. Thus, D10 T cells (a murine Th2 T cell line) were pre-incubated with Akti1/2 or solvent, then stimulated for 2–12 hours. After stimulation, mRNA was isolated, which was converted into labeled cDNA for hybridization to Illumina chips for microarray analysis (Figure 1A). We first determined which genes were differentially modulated after T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation using caGEDA with reasonably chosen thresholds for different time points (2 h, 6 h and 12 h). Further validation and downstream analysis were then performed to confirm some of the differentially expressed genes and to extract functional information from the dataset (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of experimental outline (A) and data analysis (B), as described further in the text.

We identified differentially expressed gene sets that were dependent on Akt among the three different time point groups. We compared the gene expression patterns of cells plus or minus addition of Akti1/2. First, we generated two gene lists for each time point. Gene list one represents the genes that were differentially expressed between the unstimulated and CD3/CD28 stimulated group in the absence of Akti1/2. Gene list two represents the genes that were differentially expressed between the unstimulated and CD3/CD28 group in the presence of Akti1/2. When comparing the two gene lists, three different patterns were observed:

1. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 alone but not modulated in the presence of Akti1/2 (genes in this category showed Akt–dependent expression after T cell activation; first sheet in Data File 1–Data File 3 and Supplementary Figure 1)

2. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 alone but less strikingly modulated in the presence of Akti1/2 (genes in this category showed some dependence on Akt; middle sheet in Data File 1–Data File 3 and Supplementary Figure 2) and

3. Genes not modulated by CD3/CD28 alone but significantly modulated in the presence of Akti1/2 (genes in this category displayed Akti1/2-specific expression; last sheet in Data File 1–Data File 3 and Supplementary Figure 3).

By examining multiple time points after stimulation, we were able to obtain a kinetic picture of gene expression ± Akt inhibition. The 6 h Akti1/2 (+) and Akti1/2 (-) comparison showed the highest number of differentially expressed genes, and there were fewer differentially expressed genes after two or twelve hours of TCR/CD28 stimulation. Among these, only the genes that expressed the most consistent differences (either increased or decreased expression) were selected for further analysis. Genes with no known function were excluded.

Our previous work identified several NF-κB target genes that were dependent on Akt after TCR stimulation in T helper cells, including those encoding the cytokines TNF-α, GM-CSF, and IL-10, among others¹. Analysis of the microarray data confirmed the dependency of these genes on Akt activation, which inspired confidence in our results. Moreover, expression of the mRNAs encoding many secreted proteins was also decreased by Akt inhibition, including IL-13, IL-5, IL-3 and IL-4 (Figure 2). The protein products of these genes (except IL-3) were examined in our previous paper¹, which confirmed similar decreases after Akt inhibition. Moreover, we found that expression of Ltb (encoding lymphotoxin β), Areg (encoding amphiregulin) and genes encoding the chemokines CCL1, CCL3 and CCL4 were also affected by Akt inhibition (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Selected Akt-dependent genes differentially expressed between control (0 h) and 2 h, 6 h and 12 h CD3/CD28 stimulation groups.

Relative levels of expression are represented by the J5 score.

Of note, several cell-surface proteins, including CD69, CD52 and CD82 were among the Akt-dependent genes after T cell activation (Figure 2). The CD82 molecule is a type III integral membrane protein with four transmembrane domains and is part of the tetra-span-transmembrane (TST) family, which also includes CD9, CD37, CD53, CD63 and CD81/TAPA-1¹⁸. Interestingly, proteins of this family are involved in cell activation. For example, engagement of CD82 can deliver a co-stimulatory signal, similar to CD28, for full T cell activation, leading to strong IL-2 production¹⁹. CD52 is a small glycopeptide molecule and tethered to the outer surface of the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor²⁰. CD52 crosslinking can also provide a co-stimulatory signal that causes the activation of normal human T lymphocytes²¹ and induction of CD4⁺ regulatory cells²². Since Akt was reported to mimic CD28 co-stimulation in a T cell line by synergizing with TCR-induced signals to increase transcription of the IL-2 promoter²³, activation of these other co-stimulatory molecules might also function through this pathway.

Interestingly, inhibition of Akt resulted in impaired up-regulation of the genes encoding many ribosomal proteins (Figure 3). These included: Rps6 (a major substrate of ribosomal protein kinases²⁴); Rps8, Rps9 (reported to be activated in various tumors, such as colon cancers²⁵); Rps10, Rps15, Rps24 (mutations in these gene result in Diamond-Blackfan anemia)²⁶; Rpl7a (which interacts with a subclass of nuclear receptors and inhibits their ability to activate transcription)²⁷; Rplp1 (important for elongation during protein synthesis²⁸). All these proteins belong to either small or large subunits of ribosomes; changes in their expression may contribute to an increase in protein synthesis to accommodate numerous cellular processes involved in T cell activation, in addition to the possible connections to cancer. Importantly, the expression of 18S ribosomal genes, which was used for our qPCR housekeeping gene, did not differ between our experimental groups.

Figure 3. Akt-dependent ribosomal subunit genes differentially expressed between control (0 h) and 2 h, 6 h and 12 h CD3/CD28 stimulation groups.

Relative levels of expression are represented by the J5 score.

Expression validation of selected genes

In order to validate the microarray data and obtain more quantitative data on specific genes, real-time PCR analysis was performed at different time points after CD3/CD28 stimulation ± Akti1/2. Akt is known to directly phosphorylate FOXO3a. Once phosphorylated, FOXO3a is excluded from the nucleus and becomes transcriptionally inactive²⁹. Klf6 is one of the FOXO-targeted genes. Real time PCR analysis confirmed that in the Akti1/2 group, there was an up-regulation of Klf6 as expected (Figure 4). Ier3 (also named IEX-1, immediate early response gene X-1), Il13, Ccl1 and Ccl4 were selected for real-time PCR validation because their expression was greatly enhanced after CD3/CD28 stimulation and decreased in the presence of the Akt inhibitor. Of note, the gene expression of Ccl1 and Il3 was rapidly up-regulated by CD3/CD28 stimulation, while the up-regulation of Ier3 and Ccl4 expression by CD3/CD28 stimulation was delayed. Egr1 was also selected as a control gene, which showed no CD3/CD28 dependent increase in gene expression. Thus, Akt inhibition could affect different genes that showed diverse kinetics after CD3/CD28 stimulation. For all genes tested, the expression changes assessed by real-time PCR confirmed the microarray results, giving us confidence in the overall quality of the dataset.

Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmation of the stimulation-dependent expression of selected Akt-dependent genes.

qPCR was used to validate the gene expression of Ier3, Il13, Klf6, Egr1, Ccl1 and Ccl4. The RNA samples were the same as those used for the microarray. Results are presented as relative mRNA expression, compared to the unstimulated control sample, normalized to 18S RNA expression. *** p<0.001, * p<0.05 compared with the control group.

Functional classification of the gene expression signature for Akt inhibition in activated T cells (pathway analysis of Akti1/2-mediated transcriptome changes)

From our previously published array data, we found that at two, six and twelve hours after CD3/CD28 stimulation. Akti1/2 elicited a wide range of effects on expression of numerous genes, including both over- and under-expressed genes. In the present study, genes that showed changes in expression after two, six and twelve hours of stimulation in the presence of Akti1/2 were largely not overlapping and cannot be combined for subsequent analysis. There were 54, 71 and 58 genes dependent on Akt at the two, six and twelve hour time points, respectively, after CD3/CD28 stimulation (Data File 1–Data File 2 and Supplementary Figure 1).

To determine whether our gene expression signature was enriched in specific subsets of genes with known biological functions, bioinformatic functional classification analysis of the genes that were differentially expressed was carried out as described in the Methods. The functional classifications of gene sets are illustrated in Figure 5. We found that genes involved in ribosome, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, antigen receptor signaling pathway, hematopoietic cell lineage and asthma were significantly enriched among genes affected by Akt inhibition in the presence of CD3/CD28 stimulation.

Figure 5. Functional classification of Akt dependent genes.

Classification enrichment was determined using Pathway Express. Significance is indicated as –Log (p-value).

Enrichment of transcription factors in target genes

Co-expressed genes are often regulated by common transcription factors. Therefore, we separately analyzed the genes that showed altered expression at 2, 6 and 12 h time points after CD3/CD28 stimulation using TFactS, an algorithm that used a catalog of well-characterized transcription factor targets to predict the activity of transcription factors based on microarray data¹⁷. Enrichment of transcription factors was found at all the time points tested (Figure 6). These included NF-κB family members (RelA, Rel, NF-κB1), Myc, Jun and CREB. At the 2 h time point, Myc, NF-κB family members (NF-κB1, RelA and Rel) and Egr1 were significantly enriched. RelA, NF-κB1 and Rel, along with Myc and Egr1 were also significantly regulated after 6 h of CD3/CD28 stimulation. Moreover, other transcription factors, including Sp1, CEBPB, Ets1, Jun and Nfam1, were also enriched at the 6 h time point. At 12 h after stimulation, however, fewer transcription factors were regulated, with Myc and NF-κB1 still significantly regulated. In summary, the most significantly enriched transcription factor binding sites in the regulatory regions of Akt-dependent genes after CD3 and CD28 stimulation were those of NF-κB family members and Myc.

Figure 6. Transcription factor binding sites enriched in Akt-dependent genes, as predicted by TFactS.

The list of Akt-dependent genes was submitted to TFactS (sign-less) using default settings. Significance of regulated transcription factors was determined with –log10 (e-value).

Discussion

Akt activation impacts the expression of genes responsible for cell proliferation and survival^30,31. The majority of previous global gene expression studies have investigated transcriptional programs under the combined control of both PI3K and Akt^32,33. Despite much attention in recent years to the role of Akt-regulated metabolism in T cells³⁴, a recent study provided clear evidence that Akt indeed contributes to changes in gene expression after activation of cytotoxic T cells⁴. We have also been interested for some time in achieving a greater level of clarity in separating the effects of PI3K and Akt during helper T cell activation³⁵. Our recent study identified a subset of NF-κB-dependent genes that require Akt for optimal upregulation during helper T cell activation by using a targeted gene profiling approach¹. In the present study, we performed a broader microarray analysis to characterize the global changes in gene expression resulting from inhibition of Akt in activated CD4⁺ helper T cells. Analysis of the affected genes revealed pathways that are central to the effects of Akt on helper T cell activation. Finally, analysis of the enrichment in transcription factor binding sites in our target genes further confirmed NF-κB as a regulator of these genes in response to TCR stimulation.

The generation and maintenance of memory T cells is central to the development of protective immunity, as characterized by a rapid and vigorous response after a secondary encounter with a given pathogen or antigen^36,37. Recent studies have suggested that proper regulation of Akt activity is essential for the development of memory T cells. Riou et al. found that Akt plays a critical role in the phosphorylation of FOXO3 in CD4⁺ central memory T cells (T_CM), thereby promoting T_CM survival³⁸. Abrogating the Akt survival pathway led to a greater degree of apoptosis in T_CM as compared with effector memory T cells (T_EM), confirming that T_CM are more dependent on these pathways for their survival. Sustained and strong activation of Akt was also shown in CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells (CTL) to coordinate the TCR and IL-2-induced transcriptional programs that control expression of key cytolytic effector molecules, adhesion molecules, and cytokine and chemokine receptors that distinguish effector from memory and naïve T cells⁴. It has been suggested³⁹ that Akt simultaneously induces and represses expression of key genes, leading to the development of effector CTL, with the FOXO transcription factors being at the center of this process. Thus, Kim et al. found that Akt appeared to function as a cellular rheostat, controlling distinct facets of the program that governed differentiation of Ag-activated CD8⁺ T cells into effector cells or memory CD8⁺ T cells³⁹. Myristoylated Akt transgenic mice were found to accumulate memory phenotype CD4⁺ T cells and to develop both tumors and autoimmunity⁴⁰, effects that could, in principle, be due in part to non-metabolic outcomes of Akt activation, such as NF-κB activation⁴¹.

Interestingly, the expression of Klf6, a FOXO-target gene, was increased in activated T helper cells after Akti1/2 treatment in our study. Although Klf6 did not appear in the differentially expressed gene list at any of the time points, real-time PCR showed that its expression was increased after Akt inhibition. It is known that FOXO transcription factors control regulatory T cell development and function⁴². Moreover, early Treg-cell-lineage commitment is regulated by Akt and FOXO family transcription factors^43,44. Further studies are needed to clarify whether Akt has a similar effect on CD4⁺ memory cells. FOXO and NF-κB are both known targets for Akt^45,46. The enrichment of multiple NF-κB family members in Akt-dependent genes confirmed our previous study emphasizing the important role of NF-κB in Akt-dependent biological processes¹. FOXO-target genes were not enriched in the Akt dependent gene list after T helper cell activation, although their expression (such as that of Klf6) was increased after Akt inhibition. The Akt-dependent transcription factors that are induced by TCR stimulation in T helper cells might be different from those induced in CTL.

Of note, Myc target genes were also found enriched in the subset of Akt-dependent genes after T cell activation. It is well known that Myc is associated with cell activation. However, it is now thought that Myc is not an on-off specifier of a particular transcriptional program(s) but is a universal amplifier of gene expression, increasing output at all active promoters⁴⁷. Relevant for our findings, N-Myc was reported to function as a regulator of cell growth by stimulating expression of genes functioning in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis⁴⁸. Akt was also reported to cooperate with c-Myc to increase ribosome biogenesis and cell growth, which includes the synthesis of rRNA and ribosomal proteins, processing of 45S rRNA, and assembly of functional ribosomal subunits⁴⁰. In our present study, we showed that Akt inhibition decreased the expression of many ribosomal proteins, including components of both the small (40S) and large (60S) ribosomal subunits. Putting together these disparate observations, it may be that in activated T helper cells, one of the mechanisms through which Akt broadly regulates ribosomal subunit transcription is by activating Myc.

Akt is also known to enhance ribosomal protein production through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. However, it was reported that direct inhibition of Akt only weakly suppressed the phosphorylation of S6 and S6K1 in CTLs⁴ and Akti1/2 could only weakly suppress the CD3/CD28 stimulation dependent phosphorylation of S6 in Jurkat T cells and primary T cells (unpublished data from our lab). Akt could signal through mTORC1-dependent and independent mechanisms to promote rDNA transcription in mammalian cells⁴⁰. Dissecting out the mTOR-independent mechanism that Akt utilizes to regulate ribosomal biogenesis is crucial to understand the therapeutic response to Akt inhibitors in cancer.

Author contributions

The project was conceived by LPK. Experiments were carried out by JC. Data were analyzed by JC and LPK, in consultation with the University of Pittsburgh Genomics and Proteomics Core Laboratory (GPCL). The paper was written by JC and LPK.

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This work was supported by grant GM080398 from the NIH/NIGMS to LPK.

Acknowledgements

We thank James Lyons-Weiler and Haiwen Shi of the University of Pittsburgh Genomics and Proteomics Core Laboratory (GPCL) for assistance with data analysis.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary Figure 1. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 stimulation alone, but not modulated in the presence of Akti1/2.

Each row represents a gene and each column shows one of the duplicates from two different groups (from left to right 0 h vs. 2 h, 0 h vs. 6 h, 0 h vs. 12 h). The red and green colors reflect high and low expression levels, respectively.

Supplementary Figure 2. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 stimulation alone but less modulated in the presence of Akti1/2.

Each row represents a gene and each column shows one of the duplicates from two different groups (from left to right 0 h vs. 2 h, 0 h vs. 6 h, 0 h vs. 12 h). The red and green colors reflect high and low expression levels, respectively.

Supplementary Figure 3. Genes significantly modulated by Akti1/2 alone.

Each row represents a gene and each column shows one of the duplicates from two different groups (from left to right 0 h vs. 2 h, 0 h vs. 6 h, 0 h vs.12 h). The red and green colors reflect high and low expression levels, respectively.

Faculty Opinions recommended

References

1. Cheng J, Phong B, Wilson DC, et al.: Akt Fine-tunes NF-κB-dependent gene expression during T cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(41): 36076–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
2. Pande S, Browne G, Padmanabhan S, et al.: Oncogenic cooperation between PI3K/Akt signaling and transcription factor Runx2 promotes the invasive properties of metastatic breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2013; 228(8): 1784–92. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
3. Ouyang W, Liao W, Luo CT, et al.: Novel Foxo1-dependent transcriptional programs control T(reg) cell function. Nature. 2012; 491(7425): 554–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
4. Macintyre AN, Finlay D, Preston G, et al.: Protein kinase B controls transcriptional programs that direct cytotoxic T cell fate but is dispensable for T cell metabolism. Immunity. 2011; 34(2): 224–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
5. Hand TW, Cui W, Jung YW, et al.: Differential effects of STAT5 and PI3K/AKT signaling on effector and memory CD8 T-cell survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(38): 16601–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
6. Saibil SD, Jones RG, Deenick EK, et al.: CD4+ and CD8+ T cell survival is regulated differentially by protein kinase Ctheta, c-Rel, and protein kinase B. J Immunol. 2007; 178(5): 2932–9. PubMed Abstract
7. Barnett SF, Defeo-Jones D, Fu S, et al.: Identification and characterization of pleckstrin-homology-domain-dependent and isoenzyme-specific Akt inhibitors. Biochem J. 2005; 385(Pt 2): 399–408. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
8. Barnett SF, Bilodeau MT, Lindsley CW: The Akt/PKB family of protein kinases: a review of small molecule inhibitors and progress towards target validation. Curr Top Med Chem. 2005; 5(2): 109–25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
9. DeFeo-Jones D, Barnett SF, Fu S, et al.: Tumor cell sensitization to apoptotic stimuli by selective inhibition of specific Akt/PKB family members. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005; 4(2): 271–9. PubMed Abstract
10. Lindsley CW, Zhao Z, Leister WH, et al.: Allosteric Akt (PKB) inhibitors: discovery and SAR of isozyme selective inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005; 15(3): 761–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
11. Kane LP, Mollenauer MN, Weiss A: A proline-rich motif in the C terminus of Akt contributes to its localization in the immunological synapse. J Immunol. 2004; 172(9): 5441–9. PubMed Abstract
12. Narayan P, Holt B, Tosti R, et al.: CARMA1 is required for Akt-mediated NF-kappaB activation in T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 26(6): 2327–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
13. Kaye J, Porcelli S, Tite J, et al.: Both a monoclonal antibody and antisera specific for determinants unique to individual cloned helper T cell lines can substitute for antigen and antigen-presenting cells in the activation of T cells. J Exp Med. 1983; 158(3): 836–56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
14. Jordan R, Patel S, Hu H, et al.: Efficiency analysis of competing tests for finding differentially expressed genes in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Inform. 2008; 6: 389–421. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
15. Patel S, Lyons-Weiler J: caGEDA: a web application for the integrated analysis of global gene expression patterns in cancer. Appl Bioinformatics. 2004; 3(1): 49–62. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
16. Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL, et al.: A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res. 2007; 17(10): 1537–45. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
17. Essaghir A, Toffalini F, Knoops L, et al.: Transcription factor regulation can be accurately predicted from the presence of target gene signatures in microarray gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(11): e120. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
18. Shibagaki N, Hanada K, Yamaguchi S, et al.: Functional analysis of CD82 in the early phase of T cell activation: roles in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Eur J Immunol. 1998; 28(4): 1125–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
19. Lebel-Binay S, Lagaudrière C, Fradelizi D, et al.: CD82, member of the tetra-span-transmembrane protein family, is a costimulatory protein for T cell activation. J Immunol. 1995; 155(1): 101–10. PubMed Abstract
20. Xia MQ, Tone M, Packman L, et al.: Characterization of the CAMPATH-1 (CDw52) antigen: biochemical analysis and cDNA cloning reveal an unusually small peptide backbone. Eur J Immunol. 1991; 21(7): 1677–84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
21. Rowan WC, Hale G, Tite JP, et al.: Cross-linking of the CAMPATH-1 antigen (CD52) triggers activation of normal human T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1995; 7(1): 69–77. PubMed Abstract
22. Watanabe T, Masuyama J, Sohma Y, et al.: CD52 is a novel costimulatory molecule for induction of CD4+ regulatory T cells. Clin Immunol. 2006; 120(3): 247–59. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
23. Kane LP, Andres PG, Howland KC, et al.: Akt provides the CD28 costimulatory signal for upregulation of IL-2 and IFN-gamma but not TH2 cytokines. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2(1): 37–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
24. Jastrzebski K, Hannan KM, Tchoubrieva EB, et al.: Coordinate regulation of ribosome biogenesis and function by the ribosomal protein S6 kinase, a key mediator of mTOR function. Growth Factors. 2007; 25(4): 209–26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
25. Bin Amer SM, Maqbool Z, Nirmal MS, et al.: Gene expression profiling in women with breast cancer in a Saudi population. Saudi Med J. 2008; 29(4): 507–13. PubMed Abstract
26. Doherty L, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, et al.: Ribosomal protein genes RPS10 and RPS26 are commonly mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(2): 222–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
27. Ziemiecki A, Müller RG, Fu XC, et al.: Oncogenic activation of the human trk proto-oncogene by recombination with the ribosomal large subunit protein L7a. EMBO J. 1990; 9(1): 191–6. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text
28. Artero-Castro A, Castellvi J, García A, et al.: Expression of the ribosomal proteins Rplp0, Rplp1, and Rplp2 in gynecologic tumors. Hum Pathol. 2011; 42(2): 194–203. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
29. Tzivion G, Dobson M, Ramakrishnan G: FoxO transcription factors; Regulation by AKT and 14-3-3 proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1813(11): 1938–45. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
30. Hers I, Vincent EE, Tavare JM: Akt signalling in health and disease. Cell Signal. 2011; 23(10): 1515–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
31. Manning BD, Cantley LC: AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007; 129(7): 1261–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
32. Heinonen H, Nieminen A, Saarela M, et al.: Deciphering downstream gene targets of PI3K/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in breast cancer. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9: 348. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
33. Latres E, Amini AR, Amini AA, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) inversely regulates atrophy-induced genes via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280(4): 2737–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
34. Maciver NJ, Jacobs SR, Wieman HL, et al.: Glucose metabolism in lymphocytes is a regulated process with significant effects on immune cell function and survival. J Leukoc Biol. 2008; 84(4): 949–57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
35. Kane LP, Weiss A: The PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway and T cell activation: pleiotropic pathways downstream of PIP3. Immunol Rev. 2003; 192(1): 7–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
36. Obar JJ, Jellison ER, Sheridan BS, et al.: Pathogen-induced inflammatory environment controls effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2011; 187(10): 4967–78. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
37. Kallies A: Distinct regulation of effector and memory T-cell differentiation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008; 86(4): 325–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
38. Riou C, Yassine-Diab B, Van grevenynghe J, et al.: Convergence of TCR and cytokine signaling leads to FOXO3a phosphorylation and drives the survival of CD4+ central memory T cells. J Exp Med. 2007; 204(1): 79–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
39. Kim EH, Sullivan JA, Plisch EH, et al.: Signal integration by Akt regulates CD8 T cell effector and memory differentiation. J Immunol. 2012; 188(9): 4305–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
40. Chan JC, Hannan KM, Riddell K, et al.: AKT promotes rRNA synthesis and cooperates with c-MYC to stimulate ribosome biogenesis in cancer. Sci Signal. 2011; 4(188): ra56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
41. Kane LP, Shapiro VS, Stokoe D, et al.: Induction of NF-kappaB by the Akt/PKB kinase. Curr Biol. 1999; 9(11): 601–604. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
42. Kerdiles YM, Stone EL, Beisner DR, et al.: Foxo transcription factors control regulatory T cell development and function. Immunity. 2010; 33(6): 890–904. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
43. Haxhinasto S, Mathis D, Benoist C: The AKT-mTOR axis regulates de novo differentiation of CD4+Foxp3+ cells. J Exp Med. 2008; 205(3): 565–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
44. Sauer S, Bruno L, Hertweck A, et al.: T cell receptor signaling controls Foxp3 expression via PI3K, Akt, and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(22): 7797–802. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
45. Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, et al.: Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a forkhead transcription factor. Cell. 1999; 96(6): 857–868. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
46. Romashkova JA, Makarov SS: NF-κB is a target of AKT in anti-apoptotic PDGF signalling. Nature. 1999; 401(6748): 86–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
47. Nie Z, Hu G, Wei G, et al.: c-Myc is a universal amplifier of expressed genes in lymphocytes and embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2012; 151(1): 68–79. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text
48. Boon K, Caron HN, van Asperen R, et al.: N-myc enhances the expression of a large set of genes functioning in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. EMBO J. 2001; 20(6): 1383–93. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 15 Apr 2013

Author details Author details

¹ Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA

Competing interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

Grant information

This work was supported by grant GM080398 from the NIH/NIGMS to LPK.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Article Versions (2)

version 2

Published: 15 May 2013, 2:109

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v2

version 1

Published: 15 Apr 2013, 2:109

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v1

Copyright

© 2013 Cheng J and Kane LP. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Download

Export To

metrics

	Views	Downloads
F1000Research	-	-
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.	-	-

Citations

0

SEE MORE DETAILS

CITE

how to cite this article

Cheng J and Kane LP. Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during activation of T helper cells [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2013, 2:109 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-109.v1)

NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.

track

receive updates on this article

Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?

Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE

ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested

Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.

Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Version 1

VERSION 1

PUBLISHED 15 Apr 2013

Views

25

Reviewer Report 20 May 2013

Michael Gold, Microbiology & Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.1303.r957

This article provides useful information for further assessing the role of Akt signaling in the activation of CD4+ T cells. The microarray experiments that assess the effect of an Akt inhibitor compound on gene regulation by TCR/CD28 co-stimulation are well ... Continue reading

This article provides useful information for further assessing the role of Akt signaling in the activation of CD4+ T cells. The microarray experiments that assess the effect of an Akt inhibitor compound on gene regulation by TCR/CD28 co-stimulation are well done and the accompanying bioinformatics analyses are quite sophisticated such that identified changes in gene expression needed to have passed multiple statistical tests.

Although a good starting point for further studies, the data presented have several limitations. First, the experiments were carried out entirely with a T cell line. It would have been straightforward, and of significant value, to confirm some of the key gene expression changes in primary T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 in the presence or absence of the Akt inhibitor. It is of interest that two of the Akt-dependent genes identified in this report are IL-13 and IL-4, suggesting that Akt is critical for the effector functions of Th2 cells. It would be worthwhile to discuss the role of Akt signaling in Th2 polarization versus Th2 function and to refer to, or propose, further studies to address this question.

Second, as for any study employing chemical inhibitors, it would have been useful for the authors to briefly review selectivity of this compound as well as known off-target effects on other kinases. In this regard, confirming some of the key gene expression changes by using other commercially available Akt inhibitors with different off-target effects would help confirm the dependence on Akt.

Similarly, the conclusion that many of the Akt-regulated genes may be co-regulated by NF-kB or Myc could have been tested in a limited fashion.

Despite these limitations, which will likely be dealt with in follow-up studies by these authors and others, this article provides useful data that will stimulate further work and discussion.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

25

Reviewer Report 03 May 2013

Ursula Bommhardt, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

Approved

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.1303.r925

In this publication, Cheng and Kane mapped the gene expression profile of a Th2 cell line stimulated with cross-linked CD3/CD28 Abs in the presence of Akti1/2 inhibitor using microarray and qRT-PCR analysis. They found gene expression that is not moderately ... Continue reading

In this publication, Cheng and Kane mapped the gene expression profile of a Th2 cell line stimulated with cross-linked CD3/CD28 Abs in the presence of Akti1/2 inhibitor using microarray and qRT-PCR analysis. They found gene expression that is not moderately or strongly affected by Akti1/2. Akt-dependent genes included cytokines (like IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13), chemokines (CCL1, CCL3 and CCL4), and a number of genes involved in the biosynthesis and function of ribosomes. Major Akt-dependent transcription factors included members of the NFkappaB family, c-myc and their target genes.

The study provides interesting and novel information on Akt-dependent signalling and Akt target genes which will be very useful for the further understanding of Akt function in T cells. In this line, previous publication by Patra et al. on myrAkt expression in activated CD4+ T cells had shown increased expression of Th1 as well as Th2 cytokines, including IL-10, IL-4, IL-13 (Patra et al., JI, 2004). Thus, the data of the current study support those previous results. The authors should include this publication in their citation list as well as other publication from the groups of P. Ohashi, C. Thompson and others with regard to Akt, NFkappaB and tumorigenesis.

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Views

31

Reviewer Report 24 Apr 2013

David Finlay, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Approved with Reservations

https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.1303.r910

This paper aims to determine to what extent Akt regulates the transcriptional landscape in TCR/CD28 activated CD4 T cells. While a considerable amount is known regarding Akt regulation of gene expression in activated CD8 cytotoxic T cells (McIntyre et al., ... Continue reading

This paper aims to determine to what extent Akt regulates the transcriptional landscape in TCR/CD28 activated CD4 T cells. While a considerable amount is known regarding Akt regulation of gene expression in activated CD8 cytotoxic T cells (McIntyre et al., 2011 Immunity 34(2) 224-236) less information exists with respect to CD4 T cells. Indeed it is true, as the authors say, that Akt may have distinct roles in different T cell subsets. Therefore, determining the role of Akt in controlling the transcriptome in CD4 T cell subsets addressed an important and relevant question. However, the data would have been of a much higher value had this study been carried out in primary T cells rather than a CD4 T cell line. There is no reason that using primary CD4 T cells would not have been feasible and I struggle to understand why this was not done. Therefore, this data needs to be viewed with this major caveat in mind.

I have substantial concerns regarding the concentration of Akti1/2 that is used in this study. In CD8 T cells 1µM Akti1/2 is sufficient to completely block all Akt activity. This study uses 10µM, 10 times the dose used in CD8 T cell. When using kinase inhibitors, it is extremely important to use the lowest dose that effectively inhibits the kinase activity, as excessive doses can have increased off target effects. For example it has been shown that Akti1/2 has multiple off target effects at 10µM when screened against a panel of 80 kinases (Bain J, et al., 2007, Biochem. J. 408, 297-315). Additionally, in CD8 Cytotoxic T cells, 10µM Akti1/2 is toxic and compromises cell viability, a clear demonstration of off target effects (unpublished data). The authors should demonstrate that they are using the minimum effective dose and consider what aspect of the results that they present in this paper might be due to off target effects of the Akti1/2 compound.

With respect to their data, the authors discuss the role of Foxo transcription factors as Akt substrates and there role in CD4 T cells despite the fact that they have little to no evidence that the activity of Foxo transcription factors are altered in response to Akt inhibition in this model. They state Klf6 as a Foxo target. The authors must clearly reference the work that describes Klf6 as a Foxo Target. At best Klf6 is an obscure Foxo target gene. There are numerous well defined Foxo targets in T cells, Klf2 for example, yet the absence of these Foxo target genes in the Akti1/2 regulated gene lists is not discussed at all.

A minor point, in the text it is stated that CREB was one of the transcription factors predicted by TFactS to be altered in activity (bottom of page 5), yet CREB does not appear in the corresponding figure (Figure 6).

Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

CITE

Report a concern

Respond or Comment

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2

VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 15 Apr 2013

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

	Invited Reviewers
	1	2	3
Version 2 (update) 15 May 13	read	read	read
Version 1 15 Apr 13	read	read	read

David Finlay, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Ursula Bommhardt, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Michael Gold, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Competing Interests

No competing interests were disclosed.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Respond to this report

Responses (0)

[1] 1. Cheng J, Phong B, Wilson DC, et al.: Akt Fine-tunes NF-κB-dependent gene expression during T cell activation. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(41): 36076–85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[2] 2. Pande S, Browne G, Padmanabhan S, et al.: Oncogenic cooperation between PI3K/Akt signaling and transcription factor Runx2 promotes the invasive properties of metastatic breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol. 2013; 228(8): 1784–92. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[3] 3. Ouyang W, Liao W, Luo CT, et al.: Novel Foxo1-dependent transcriptional programs control T(reg) cell function. Nature. 2012; 491(7425): 554–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[4] 4. Macintyre AN, Finlay D, Preston G, et al.: Protein kinase B controls transcriptional programs that direct cytotoxic T cell fate but is dispensable for T cell metabolism. Immunity. 2011; 34(2): 224–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[5] 5. Hand TW, Cui W, Jung YW, et al.: Differential effects of STAT5 and PI3K/AKT signaling on effector and memory CD8 T-cell survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(38): 16601–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[6] 6. Saibil SD, Jones RG, Deenick EK, et al.: CD4+ and CD8+ T cell survival is regulated differentially by protein kinase Ctheta, c-Rel, and protein kinase B. J Immunol. 2007; 178(5): 2932–9. PubMed Abstract

[7] 7. Barnett SF, Defeo-Jones D, Fu S, et al.: Identification and characterization of pleckstrin-homology-domain-dependent and isoenzyme-specific Akt inhibitors. Biochem J. 2005; 385(Pt 2): 399–408. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[8] 8. Barnett SF, Bilodeau MT, Lindsley CW: The Akt/PKB family of protein kinases: a review of small molecule inhibitors and progress towards target validation. Curr Top Med Chem. 2005; 5(2): 109–25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[9] 9. DeFeo-Jones D, Barnett SF, Fu S, et al.: Tumor cell sensitization to apoptotic stimuli by selective inhibition of specific Akt/PKB family members. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005; 4(2): 271–9. PubMed Abstract

[10] 10. Lindsley CW, Zhao Z, Leister WH, et al.: Allosteric Akt (PKB) inhibitors: discovery and SAR of isozyme selective inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005; 15(3): 761–4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[11] 11. Kane LP, Mollenauer MN, Weiss A: A proline-rich motif in the C terminus of Akt contributes to its localization in the immunological synapse. J Immunol. 2004; 172(9): 5441–9. PubMed Abstract

[12] 12. Narayan P, Holt B, Tosti R, et al.: CARMA1 is required for Akt-mediated NF-kappaB activation in T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 26(6): 2327–36. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[13] 13. Kaye J, Porcelli S, Tite J, et al.: Both a monoclonal antibody and antisera specific for determinants unique to individual cloned helper T cell lines can substitute for antigen and antigen-presenting cells in the activation of T cells. J Exp Med. 1983; 158(3): 836–56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[14] 14. Jordan R, Patel S, Hu H, et al.: Efficiency analysis of competing tests for finding differentially expressed genes in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Inform. 2008; 6: 389–421. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[15] 15. Patel S, Lyons-Weiler J: caGEDA: a web application for the integrated analysis of global gene expression patterns in cancer. Appl Bioinformatics. 2004; 3(1): 49–62. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[16] 16. Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL, et al.: A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res. 2007; 17(10): 1537–45. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[17] 17. Essaghir A, Toffalini F, Knoops L, et al.: Transcription factor regulation can be accurately predicted from the presence of target gene signatures in microarray gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(11): e120. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[18] 18. Shibagaki N, Hanada K, Yamaguchi S, et al.: Functional analysis of CD82 in the early phase of T cell activation: roles in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Eur J Immunol. 1998; 28(4): 1125–33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[19] 19. Lebel-Binay S, Lagaudrière C, Fradelizi D, et al.: CD82, member of the tetra-span-transmembrane protein family, is a costimulatory protein for T cell activation. J Immunol. 1995; 155(1): 101–10. PubMed Abstract

[20] 20. Xia MQ, Tone M, Packman L, et al.: Characterization of the CAMPATH-1 (CDw52) antigen: biochemical analysis and cDNA cloning reveal an unusually small peptide backbone. Eur J Immunol. 1991; 21(7): 1677–84. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[21] 21. Rowan WC, Hale G, Tite JP, et al.: Cross-linking of the CAMPATH-1 antigen (CD52) triggers activation of normal human T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1995; 7(1): 69–77. PubMed Abstract

[22] 22. Watanabe T, Masuyama J, Sohma Y, et al.: CD52 is a novel costimulatory molecule for induction of CD4+ regulatory T cells. Clin Immunol. 2006; 120(3): 247–59. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[23] 23. Kane LP, Andres PG, Howland KC, et al.: Akt provides the CD28 costimulatory signal for upregulation of IL-2 and IFN-gamma but not TH2 cytokines. Nat Immunol. 2001; 2(1): 37–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[24] 24. Jastrzebski K, Hannan KM, Tchoubrieva EB, et al.: Coordinate regulation of ribosome biogenesis and function by the ribosomal protein S6 kinase, a key mediator of mTOR function. Growth Factors. 2007; 25(4): 209–26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[25] 25. Bin Amer SM, Maqbool Z, Nirmal MS, et al.: Gene expression profiling in women with breast cancer in a Saudi population. Saudi Med J. 2008; 29(4): 507–13. PubMed Abstract

[26] 26. Doherty L, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, et al.: Ribosomal protein genes RPS10 and RPS26 are commonly mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(2): 222–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[27] 27. Ziemiecki A, Müller RG, Fu XC, et al.: Oncogenic activation of the human trk proto-oncogene by recombination with the ribosomal large subunit protein L7a. EMBO J. 1990; 9(1): 191–6. PubMed Abstract | Free Full Text

[28] 28. Artero-Castro A, Castellvi J, García A, et al.: Expression of the ribosomal proteins Rplp0, Rplp1, and Rplp2 in gynecologic tumors. Hum Pathol. 2011; 42(2): 194–203. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[29] 29. Tzivion G, Dobson M, Ramakrishnan G: FoxO transcription factors; Regulation by AKT and 14-3-3 proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011; 1813(11): 1938–45. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[30] 30. Hers I, Vincent EE, Tavare JM: Akt signalling in health and disease. Cell Signal. 2011; 23(10): 1515–27. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[31] 31. Manning BD, Cantley LC: AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007; 129(7): 1261–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[32] 32. Heinonen H, Nieminen A, Saarela M, et al.: Deciphering downstream gene targets of PI3K/mTOR/p70S6K pathway in breast cancer. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9: 348. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[33] 33. Latres E, Amini AR, Amini AA, et al.: Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) inversely regulates atrophy-induced genes via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005; 280(4): 2737–44. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[34] 34. Maciver NJ, Jacobs SR, Wieman HL, et al.: Glucose metabolism in lymphocytes is a regulated process with significant effects on immune cell function and survival. J Leukoc Biol. 2008; 84(4): 949–57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[35] 35. Kane LP, Weiss A: The PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway and T cell activation: pleiotropic pathways downstream of PIP3. Immunol Rev. 2003; 192(1): 7–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[36] 36. Obar JJ, Jellison ER, Sheridan BS, et al.: Pathogen-induced inflammatory environment controls effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2011; 187(10): 4967–78. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[37] 37. Kallies A: Distinct regulation of effector and memory T-cell differentiation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008; 86(4): 325–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[38] 38. Riou C, Yassine-Diab B, Van grevenynghe J, et al.: Convergence of TCR and cytokine signaling leads to FOXO3a phosphorylation and drives the survival of CD4+ central memory T cells. J Exp Med. 2007; 204(1): 79–91. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[39] 39. Kim EH, Sullivan JA, Plisch EH, et al.: Signal integration by Akt regulates CD8 T cell effector and memory differentiation. J Immunol. 2012; 188(9): 4305–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[40] 40. Chan JC, Hannan KM, Riddell K, et al.: AKT promotes rRNA synthesis and cooperates with c-MYC to stimulate ribosome biogenesis in cancer. Sci Signal. 2011; 4(188): ra56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[41] 41. Kane LP, Shapiro VS, Stokoe D, et al.: Induction of NF-kappaB by the Akt/PKB kinase. Curr Biol. 1999; 9(11): 601–604. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[42] 42. Kerdiles YM, Stone EL, Beisner DR, et al.: Foxo transcription factors control regulatory T cell development and function. Immunity. 2010; 33(6): 890–904. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[43] 43. Haxhinasto S, Mathis D, Benoist C: The AKT-mTOR axis regulates de novo differentiation of CD4+Foxp3+ cells. J Exp Med. 2008; 205(3): 565–74. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[44] 44. Sauer S, Bruno L, Hertweck A, et al.: T cell receptor signaling controls Foxp3 expression via PI3K, Akt, and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(22): 7797–802. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[45] 45. Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, et al.: Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a forkhead transcription factor. Cell. 1999; 96(6): 857–868. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[46] 46. Romashkova JA, Makarov SS: NF-κB is a target of AKT in anti-apoptotic PDGF signalling. Nature. 1999; 401(6748): 86–90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

[47] 47. Nie Z, Hu G, Wei G, et al.: c-Myc is a universal amplifier of expressed genes in lymphocytes and embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2012; 151(1): 68–79. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

[48] 48. Boon K, Caron HN, van Asperen R, et al.: N-myc enhances the expression of a large set of genes functioning in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. EMBO J. 2001; 20(6): 1383–93. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text

Global identification of genes and pathways regulated by Akt during activation of T helper cells

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Antibodies and reagents

T cells

RNA extraction and microarray gene expression profiling

Statistical analysis of gene expression microarray data

Real-time PCR analysis

Enrichment in transcription factor target gene analysis

Results

Identification of genes regulated by Akt signaling in activated CD4+ T cells

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Selected Akt-dependent genes differentially expressed between control (0 h) and 2 h, 6 h and 12 h CD3/CD28 stimulation groups.

Figure 3. Akt-dependent ribosomal subunit genes differentially expressed between control (0 h) and 2 h, 6 h and 12 h CD3/CD28 stimulation groups.

Expression validation of selected genes

Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) confirmation of the stimulation-dependent expression of selected Akt-dependent genes.

Functional classification of the gene expression signature for Akt inhibition in activated T cells (pathway analysis of Akti1/2-mediated transcriptome changes)

Figure 5. Functional classification of Akt dependent genes.

Enrichment of transcription factors in target genes

Figure 6. Transcription factor binding sites enriched in Akt-dependent genes, as predicted by TFactS.

Discussion

Author contributions

Competing interests

Grant information

Acknowledgements

Supplementary materials

Supplementary Figure 1. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 stimulation alone, but not modulated in the presence of Akti1/2.

Supplementary Figure 2. Genes significantly modulated by CD3/CD28 stimulation alone but less modulated in the presence of Akti1/2.

Supplementary Figure 3. Genes significantly modulated by Akti1/2 alone.

References

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Open Peer Review

Reviewer Status

Reviewer Reports

Comments on this article

Browse by related subjects

Competing Interests Policy

Stay Updated

Identification of genes regulated by Akt signaling in activated CD4⁺ T cells