Heim A and Lundholm J. Cladonia lichens on extensive green roofs: evapotranspiration, substrate temperature, and albedo [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 2:274 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-274.v2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
1Biology Department, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, B3H 3C3, Canada
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS
Abstract
Green roofs are constructed ecosystems that provide ecosystem services in urban environments. Shallow substrate green roofs subject the vegetation layer to desiccation and other environmental extremes, so researchers have evaluated a variety of stress-tolerant vegetation types for green roof applications. Lichens can be found in most terrestrial habitats. They are able to survive extremely harsh conditions, including frequent cycles of desiccation and rehydration, nutrient-poor soil, fluctuating temperatures, and high UV intensities. Extensive green roofs (substrate depth <20cm) exhibit these harsh conditions, making lichens possible candidates for incorporation into the vegetation layer on extensive green roofs. In a modular green roof system, we tested the effect of Cladonia lichens on substrate temperature, water loss, and albedo compared to a substrate-only control. Overall, the Cladonia modules had significantly cooler substrate temperatures during the summer and significantly warmer temperatures during the fall. Additionally, the Cladonia modules lost significantly less water than the substrate-only control. This implies that they may be able to benefit neighboring vascular plant species by reducing water loss and maintaining favorable substrate temperatures.
Corresponding author:
Amy Heim
Competing interests:
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information:
This research was funded by NSERC Discovery Grant 311788-2010 to J. Lundholm.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
We have addressed the reviewer comments in the text. We have added more text to the discussion dealing with the issue of lichen fragmentation and possible death during our experiment. While some of the functions of these lichen mats (substrate temperature reductions and increased albedo) would continue as long as the mats remain in place, even of some of the lichen thallus dies off, high winds resulted in loss of lichen cover in some of our modules. This reduces the aesthetic appeal of the green roof system. On the other hand, the literature suggests that lichens can regenerate from small thallus fragments, so this may result in further colonization of different parts of the roof. Overall, we have included reference to more of the lichen literature that treats the issue of growth rates, regeneration and transplant success in this genus of lichens. We maintain that our study demonstrates a potential use of lichens in the green roof context, but more research is necessary to determine whether transplanting can result in viable populations on roofs, and ex situ propagation methods should be explored so that incorporation of Cladionia spp. in green roof projects can be done without damage to natural ecosystems.
We have addressed the reviewer comments in the text. We have added more text to the discussion dealing with the issue of lichen fragmentation and possible death during our experiment. While some of the functions of these lichen mats (substrate temperature reductions and increased albedo) would continue as long as the mats remain in place, even of some of the lichen thallus dies off, high winds resulted in loss of lichen cover in some of our modules. This reduces the aesthetic appeal of the green roof system. On the other hand, the literature suggests that lichens can regenerate from small thallus fragments, so this may result in further colonization of different parts of the roof. Overall, we have included reference to more of the lichen literature that treats the issue of growth rates, regeneration and transplant success in this genus of lichens. We maintain that our study demonstrates a potential use of lichens in the green roof context, but more research is necessary to determine whether transplanting can result in viable populations on roofs, and ex situ propagation methods should be explored so that incorporation of Cladionia spp. in green roof projects can be done without damage to natural ecosystems.
Green roofs are constructed ecosystems, designed to provide ecosystem services such as the reduction of heat flux through the roof, the capture of storm water, and the provision of habitat for animals1,2. Green roofs consist of a vegetation and growing medium layer (substrate) over engineered layers that provide a root barrier, drainage, and/or water retention layers1. The majority of green roofs constructed in temperate climates are “extensive” green roofs, characterized by shallow growing media (<20cm), which minimizes the weight added to the building. Shallow growing media in such systems have led to a reliance on succulent plant species in the vegetation layer, to ensure survival during drought conditions. Other plant growth forms have also been used on extensive green roofs, with grasses, forbs, and mosses among the most frequent3,4. Lichens are often found on conventional roof surfaces5 and form an important component of cryptogamic crusts in terrestrial ecosystems6. Cryptogamic crusts in arid environments perform a range of ecosystem services, such as stabilizing soil, fixing nitrogen, and enhancing soil water holding capacity7, but have not been intentionally planted in green roof ecosystems.
Lichens are symbiotic organisms, an association between a fungus (the mycobiont) and one or more algal and/or cyanobacterial photobionts8,9. Typically the mycobiont forms 95% of the lichen body. They are the dominant plant life in harsh environments such as the Arctic, Antarctic, mountains, and dry land crusts8. Lichen species are widespread and can be found from the Arctic to deserts; they can survive frequent cycles of desiccation and rehydration, nutrient-poor soil, fluctuating temperatures, and UV light intensities8,10. They can survive and grow on the bare surface of rocks and in poor soils such as heathlands, peat lands, sand dunes, and toxic spoil heaps10. Selection of vegetation types appropriate for extensive green roofs often involves identifying local habitats that have characteristics in common with green roofs (shallow soil, harsh abiotic conditions)11; lichens are a common component of rock barrens, dunes, and heathland habitats that can be a source of plants for green roofing projects12,13.
Lichens are lightweight and can be found growing naturally on bare tile or slate rooftops1. This could make them a candidate for roofs on buildings with low weight-loading capabilities. Species of the genus Cladonia, large fruticose lichens that colonize bare soils, are common in cold temperate climates. These lichens produce bundles of hyphae that stabilize the soil and add organic matter. The light color of the lichen can reflect solar radiation, keeping the soil cool and moist14. These characteristics indicate the possible utility of Cladonia as a component of extensive green roofs. In this study, the performance of key green roof ecosystem functions in green roof modules planted with live Cladonia lichens was compared with substrate-only controls.
Methods
The study site was located on the east side of the roof of the five-story Atrium building at Saint Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (44°39′N, 63°35′W ) (Figure 1). Data on soil temperature and water loss were collected between July and October 2012. Albedo was measured in September 2013. During the 2012 study period, the weather station on the adjacent green roof testing facility (~50m away from the study site) recorded the minimum monthly temperature as 6.7–20.7°C and the monthly maximum as 12–30°C. The monthly precipitation recorded from the green roof weather station averaged between 1.7 and 11.59mm. Albedo was collected on September 28, 2013 (average temperature: 14.12°C, total precipitation: 0mm).
Figure 1. Placement of lichen trial on the east side of the roof of the five-story Atrium building at Saint Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (44°39′N, 63°35′W).
In order to quantify the influence of Cladonia on green roof substrate, a trial was set up to determine the effects of Cladonia on soil temperature, water loss, and albedo. Ten green roof modules were placed on the Atrium roof on top of the roof surface, which was made up of grey concrete pavers. Each module had a length and width of 36cm, with a freely draining base (Polyflat®, Stuewe & Sons Inc., Oregon, USA). Modules contained a root barrier/water retention fleece (length and width 36cm) over the base (EnkaRetain and Drain 3111®, Colbond Inc., North Carolina, USA) with 6cm depth of Sopraflor X substrate, purchased in 2011 (Soprema Inc., Drummondville, QC, Canada), over the root barrier/water retention layer. A soil test describing the composition of the Soprema X substrate can be seen in Supplementary Table 1. This experiment consisted of two substrate-only controls and eight modules covered 100% in Cladonia lichen approximately 6cm thick (Figure 2). The lichen was collected from a coastal barrens site (Chebucto Head (44°30′N, 63°31′W)) in May 2012 and placed on the surface of the substrate. A mix of two lichen species, C. terranova and C. boryi, was used; both species have similar colors and growth forms, and co-occur in lichen mats. Lichens were alive when transplanted and shoot tips were marked to determine incremental growth over the experiment.
Figure 2. A Cladonia module used in the lichen trial.
Each module had a length and width of 36cm with a substrate depth of 6cm.
Substrate temperature and volumetric water content (VWC)
Substrate temperature was recorded using a Taylor 9878 Slim-Line Pocket Thermometer Probe (Commercial Solutions Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) once a month throughout the growing season. The temperature was recorded from the center of each module approximately 2cm below the substrate surface when exposed to full sun, no more than two hours from solar noon. Only one measurement was recorded for each module on the day of measurement. These spot measurements represented maximal substrate temperatures and were collected during hot sunny conditions to provide maximum contrast between controls and planted green roof modules. This technique does not characterize the long-term provisioning of thermal benefits but has been used to contrast performance of different plant species or vegetation types during hot conditions15. Volumetric water content of the substrate (VWC: water volume/soil volume × 100%) was recorded one day after a rain event and again one day later if no new showers were observed. Water loss was determined by subtracting the day one VWC from the day two VWC, which provides an index of net evapotranspiration over 24 hours15. This variable is also used as an index of the hydrological performance of green roof systems. Measurements were taken once in August, September, and October 2012. VWC was measured using a GS3 probe with the ProCheck soil moisture control unit (Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, Washington, USA) inserted into the center of each module adjacent to the target species to a depth of 5cm. Separate two sample t-tests were used to compare water loss and substrate temperature between control and lichen treatments. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analysis was analyzed using R project for statistical engineering version 3.0.1 (http://www.r-project.org/index.html).
Albedo
Albedo was not originally part of this trial, it was added later in order to get a better understanding of how Cladonia lichen could affect green roof substrates; visually, the lichens were very similar throughout both 2012 and 2013. Albedo was measured on September 28, 2013. The information was gathered from five lichen modules (100% cover) from the previous season and five substrate only controls created by removing vegetation from the old lichen modules (due to wind damage, only five lichen modules could be salvaged). Albedo was measured with a single LI-COR pyranometer sensor and LI-250A light meter (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States) attached to a fixed position 35cm above the soil surface. The incoming solar radiation (Wm-2) was measured by pointing the sensor 180° from the roof surface. The reflected radiation was measured by rotating the sensor 180° to face each module. Albedo was calculated by dividing the reflected radiation by the incoming radiation15, and a one-tailed t-test was used to compare the control and lichen modules. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The albedo of the Cladonia modules was significantly higher than the control modules (Table 1, Data Set 1). Substrate temperatures for July and August were significantly lower in the Cladonia modules compared to the controls (Table 1). In September, there was no significant difference in soil temperature between the Cladonia modules and the controls. In October, the Cladonia modules had significantly higher substrate temperatures than the controls (Table 1, Data Set 2). Regarding water loss, there was no significant difference between the Cladonia modules and the control for August, but in September and October, Cladonia modules lost significantly less water than the controls (Table 1, Data Set 3).
Table 1. Mean (± SE) temperature (°C), water loss (reduction in % VMC) and albedo (reflected radiation/incoming radiation) of the Cladonia modules compared to the substrate-only controls.
An (*) indicates a significant difference (>0.05) between the substrate-only control and Cladonia treatment determined by a t-test.
Measurement
Month
Control
Cladonia
P-value
Temperature
July 2012*
35.90±1.700
30.64±0.604
0.0062
August 2012*
31.05±0.250
26.46±0.397
0.0006
September 2012
26.90±0.900
26.48±0.370
0.6314
October 2012*
24.7±0.200
26.51±0.306
0.0227
Water loss
August 2012
3.350±0.650
1.825±1.131
0.5395
September 2012*
6.350±1.750
0.975±0.478
0.0022
October 2012*
8.90±2.300
1.212±0.725
0.0025
Albedo
September 2013
0.2965±0.012
0.3323±0.11
0.0278
Data Set 1. Raw albedo data for the lichen modules and substrate only controls taken on September 28, 2013.
Albedo was calculated by dividing the reflected radiation (Wm-2) by the incoming radiation (Wm-2).
Treatment
Incoming
Reflected
Albedo
Lichen
307.9
116.7
0.379019
Lichen
308.1
117
0.379747
Lichen
314.3
115.91
0.368788
Lichen
309
113.1
0.366019
Lichen
312
119.1
0.381731
Control
290.1
93.95
0.323854
Control
298.3
97.72
0.32759
Control
299.9
91.97
0.306669
Control
304.3
94.7
0.311206
Control
306.1
102.06
0.33342
Data Set 2. Raw temperature data (°C) for the lichen modules and substrate only controls during the 2012 growing season (mm/dd/yyyy).
Treatment
7/1/2013
8/4/2013
9/12/2013
10/3/2013
Lichen
31.9
28.3
27.7
27.5
Lichen
28.8
25.9
27.8
27.3
Lichen
31.6
26.5
26.9
27.2
Lichen
30.9
26
26.7
26.9
Lichen
33.4
28.1
26.5
26.5
Lichen
29.3
25.3
26
26
Lichen
30.8
25.9
25.4
25.5
Lichen
28.4
25.7
24.8
25.2
Control
37.6
31.3
27.8
24.9
Control
34.2
30.8
26
24.5
Data Set 3. Raw volumetric water content data (%) for the lichen modules and substrate only controls during the 2012 growing season (mm/dd/yyyy).
Treatment
8/21/2012
8/22/2012
9/11/2012
9/12/2012
10/3/2012
10/4/2012
Lichen
32.6
27.7
34.4
34.4
31.9
30.3
Lichen
38.8
39.9
41.8
42.7
42.3
42.2
Lichen
37.2
37.7
41.5
41.3
42.7
42.4
Lichen
37.3
39.6
42.7
42.7
42.7
37.1
Lichen
29.8
28.8
42.5
39.9
42.5
42.3
Lichen
35
33.8
41.2
39
42.6
41.4
Lichen
36.4
30.9
41
39.9
40.5
41.8
Lichen
33.6
27.7
41
38.4
42.5
40.5
Control
24
21.3
34
25.9
35.7
24.5
Control
23.7
19.7
30.3
25.7
31
24.4
Discussion
Compared to the substrate-only controls, the Cladonia modules were cooler during hot conditions and retained more moisture in the substrate. These cooler temperatures may have been a result of shading and higher albedo. Even though albedo was only measured in 2013, the Cladonia lichen always had a lighter coloring than the bare substrate. Lighter colors are associated with higher albedo. Likewise, the lichen cover resulted in less net evapotranspiration compared with the bare substrate treatment. Interestingly, the soil temperature during October (average air temperature on date of measurement: 17.9°C) was significantly warmer in the Cladonia modules compared to the controls. This implies that a Cladonia mat may help reduce heat loss during the winter and help cool the roof during the summer.
Plants surrounded by Cladonia may benefit from such temperature regulation (cooler temperatures in the summer, warmer temperatures in the winter) and greater water availability. Other studies have shown that plants with mat-forming growth can benefit less drought-tolerant species16. In addition to this, Cladonia lichens do not appear detrimental to plant growth. Vascular plant species growing out of these lichen mats is a natural occurrence on the coastal barrens of Nova Scotia and, during the trial, seedlings of trees and grasses (carried in by the wind or by birds) were observed growing out of these modules, although control modules also had such seedling growth. Some lichen species also play a key role in soil development in conditions of high abiotic stress8,17. If lichen inclusion on a green roof could improve the substrate properties for neighboring species, the entire system would benefit.
In this study, while the lichens remained in the roof modules for the duration of the experiment, it is not clear that the lichens remained alive. Fruticose lichens grow an average of 1.5–10mm per year14. However, the relative growth rate of transplanted Cladonia mats compared to established Cladonia mats can besignificantly lower18. The growth of Cladonia in these modules was undetectable. Additionally, during the 2012 growing season the Cladonia lichen did not suffer from wind damage and appeared equivalent in size as to when initially established. However, during the 2013 growing season the Cladonia lichen mats fragmented, decreasing in size (personal observation). This fragmentation led to wind damage that only occurred during the 2013 growing season. Since green roofs can be exposed to high winds, unattached lichen could decrease any value the lichen may have to offer. This fragmentation could have been due to a number of factors such as incompatible soil chemistry, wind damage, or winter damage. While the fragmentation is undesirable aesthetically and functionally, it is possible that such fragments could colonize other parts of the green roof, should they be deposited in suitable areas.
More research is necessary to determine whether this method of transplanting lichens onto green roof substrates results in viable lichen populations. Further, our transplanting method involved sourcing lichens from the wild. While these species are very common in the region, this kind of collection would clearly not be feasible on an industrial scale. Additionally, the propagation of this genus is slow. Expansion of existing colonies can occur through the fragmentation of the thallus and subsequent growth of branches that fall to the ground, vertical growth from the base, and apical growth leading to larger clumps19.
Alternatives to Cladonia lichens providing high albedo and lack of competition with plant roots could include light-coloured gravel, stones, or woody debris, however more research is needed to determine the effect these materials would have on the green roof system. Finally, while green roofs are becoming more popular in all regions, lichens, in varying degrees, are sensitive to air pollution and many species are likely to perform poorly where air quality is low14. Our study establishes that Cladonia lichens could provide roof cooling and water retention services in a green roof environment, but more work is necessary to explore the long-term viability of fruticose lichens in these systems.
Author contributions
A. Heim contributed to experimental design, collected the data, analyzed data, wrote the paper; J. Lundholm contributed to experimental design and wrote the paper. Both authors checked and agreed to the final publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information
This research was funded by NSERC Discovery Grant 311788-2010 to J. Lundholm.
Acknowledgments
We thank Emily Walker for critical edits on the manuscript.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Table 1. A soil test conducted by Nova Scotia Agriculture describing the elements present in the Soprema X 2011 substrate.
Soprema X 2011
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Average
pH
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
Organic Matter (%)
5.8
6
5.9
5.9
P205 (kg/ha)
669
727
739
711.7
K2O (kg/ha)
1606
1586
1720
1637.3
Ca (kg/ha)
4542
4860
4806
4736
Mg (kg/ha)
860
902
912
891.3
Na (kg/ha)
317
309
340
322
Sulfur (kg/ha)
463
424
552
479.7
Al (ppm)
311.85
414.78
452.07
392.9
Fe (ppm)
111
125
134
123.3
Mn (ppm)
30
34
35
33
Cu (ppm)
1.79
1.94
1.99
1.9
Zn (ppm)
6.6
6.5
6.7
6.6
B (ppm)
1.27
1.29
1.28
1.28
Nitrate - N (ppm)
41.3
33.2
44.7
39.7
% Nitrogen
0.39
0.41
0.35
0.4
Salt (mhos × 10)
CEC (meq/100gm)
17.4
18.3
18.5
18.1
Base Sat. K (%)
9.8
9.2
9.9
9.6
Base Sat. Ca (%)
65.2
66.2
65.1
65.5
Base Sat. Mg (%)
20.6
20.5
20.6
20.6
Base Sat. Na (%)
4
3.7
4
3.9
Base Sat. H (%)
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
Lime Required (t/ha)
6
6
6
6
Supplementary Figure 1. Substrate temperature for the two control modules and eight Cladonia modules during the 2012 growing season.
Supplementary Figure 2. Substrate water loss for the two control modules and eight Cladonia modules during the 2012 growing season
Supplementary Figure 3. Albedo of the five control modules and five Cladonia modules recorded on September 28, 2013
Faculty Opinions recommended
References
1.
Dunnett N, Kingsbury N:
Planting green roofs and living walls. Timber press: Portland, Oregon. 2004; 75. , 104–114. Reference Source
2.
Getter KL, Rowe DB:
The Role of Extensive Green Roofs in Sustainable Development.
Hortscience.
2006; 41(5): 1276. Reference Source
3.
Emilsson T, Kaj R:
Comparison of establishment methods for extensive green roofs in southern Sweden.
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening.
2005; 3(2): 103–111. Publisher Full Text
4.
Dvorak B, Volder A:
Green roof vegetation for North American ecoregions: A literature review.
Landsc Urban Plan.
2010; 96(4): 197–213. Publisher Full Text
5.
Richardson DHS:
The transplantation of lichen thalli to solve some taxonomic problems in Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr.
The Lichenologist.
1967; 3: 386–391. Publisher Full Text
6.
Eldridge DJ, Greene RSB:
Microbiotic soil crusts: a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia.
Australian Journal of Soil Research.
1994; 32: 389–415. Publisher Full Text
7.
Belnap J, Prasse R, Harper KT:
Influence of biological soil crusts on soil environments and vascular plants. Belnap J and Lange OL (eds.) Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2003; 281–300. Publisher Full Text
8.
Beckett RP, Zavarzina AG, Liers C:
Oxidoreductases and cellulases in lichens: Possible roles in lichen biology and soil organic matter turnover.
Fungal Biol.
2013; 117(6): 431–438. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text
9.
Scheidegger C, Werth S:
Conservation strategies for lichens: insights from population biology.
Fungal Biology Reviews.
2009; 23(3): 55–66. Publisher Full Text
10.
Seymour F, Crittenden D, Dyer P:
Sex in the extremes: lichen-forming fungi.
Mycologist.
2005; 19(2): 51–58. Publisher Full Text
11.
Lundholm JT:
Green roofs and facades: a habitat template approach.
Urban Habitats.
2006; 4: 87–101. Reference Source
12.
Clayden S, Bouchard A:
Structure and dynamics of conifer-lichen stands on rock outcrops south of Lake Abitibi, Quebec.
Can J Bot.
1983; 61(3): 850–871. Publisher Full Text
13.
Oberndorfer EC, Lundholm JT:
Species richness, abundance, rarity and environmental gradients in coastal barren vegetation.
Biodivers Conserv.
2009; 18(6): 1523–1553. Publisher Full Text
14.
Brodo I, Sharnoff SD, Sharnoff S:
Lichens of North America. Yale University Press: New Haven. 2001; 3, 9, 50. Reference Source
15.
MacIvor S, Lundholm J:
Performance evaluation of native plants suited to extensive green roof conditions in a maritime climate.
Ecol Eng.
2011; 37(3): 407–417. Publisher Full Text
16.
Butler C, Orians CM:
Sedum cools soil and can improve neighboring plant performance during water deficit on a green roof.
Ecological Engineering.
2011; 37(11): 1796–1803. Publisher Full Text
17.
Asta F, Orry F, Toutain B, et al.:
Micromorphological and ultrastructural investigations of the lichen–soil interface.
Soil Biol Biochem.
2001; 33(3): 323–337. Publisher Full Text
18.
Hyvärinen M, Crittenden PD:
Growth of the cushion-forming lichen, Cladonia portentosa, at nitrogen-polluted and unpolluted heathland sites.
Environ Exp Bot.
1998; 40(1): 67–76. Publisher Full Text
19.
Yarranton GA:
Population Growth in Cladonia stellaris (Opiz.) Pouz. and Vezda.
New Phytol.
1975; 75(1): 99–110. Publisher Full Text
This research was funded by NSERC Discovery Grant 311788-2010 to J. Lundholm.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Heim A and Lundholm J. Cladonia lichens on extensive green roofs: evapotranspiration, substrate temperature, and albedo [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 2:274 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-274.v2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Share
Open Peer Review
Current Reviewer Status:
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses
VIEWHIDE
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
This revision appears acceptable to me with one minor grammatical change. The fourth sentence of the second paragraph in the Discussion section should read: "Vascular plant species growing out of these lichen mats are a natural. . . " To
... Continue reading
This revision appears acceptable to me with one minor grammatical change. The fourth sentence of the second paragraph in the Discussion section should read: "Vascular plant species growing out of these lichen mats are a natural. . . " To get agreement between plural subject (species) and verb (is) are.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
The title and abstract cover the contents of this original work well. The study design, methods and analysis seem appropriate. Overall I do agree with the conclusions. However, one crucial element should be mentioned (which is recognized by the authors).
The
... Continue reading
The title and abstract cover the contents of this original work well. The study design, methods and analysis seem appropriate. Overall I do agree with the conclusions. However, one crucial element should be mentioned (which is recognized by the authors).
The fact that it is not sure that the lichens still were alive after the experiment puts considerable constraints about the applicability of these organisms in extensive green roof systems. My experience with lichens is that they normally grow on nutrient poor, dry, acidophilous soils. I've seen Cladonia's enter extensive green roof systems after a number of years (when substrate pH dropped). Green roof substrate used here (which is the standard) is indeed nutrient poor, but definitely not acid (see info). That makes the point whether these lichens are still alive or not even more important. One could eventually use dead lichen material and or other dead materials with similar properties (e.g. albedo), e.g. white pebbles.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
The lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are
...
Continue readingThe lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are no other local sources of these species)
The lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are no other local sources of these species)
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
The lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are
...
Continue readingThe lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are no other local sources of these species)
The lichens were alive after all. We have since observed the same species colonizing an adjacent green roof from fragments originating in the experiment described in this paper. (there are no other local sources of these species)
Competing Interests:No competing interests were disclosed.Close
The Title is appropriate, the Abstract is useful and the article clearly constructed. The experimental design also appears appropriate.
I am pleased to see complete data collection information, enabling the experiment to be duplicated, however, although it is required as a
... Continue reading
The Title is appropriate, the Abstract is useful and the article clearly constructed. The experimental design also appears appropriate.
I am pleased to see complete data collection information, enabling the experiment to be duplicated, however, although it is required as a part of the F1000Research format, the raw data could be more easily understood if graphed.
I have the following comments about the Conclusion/Discussion section:
The last part of last sentence in the Methods section should go into the Discussion and lead on to a more detailed discussion of the lichen’s growth (or death).
This following sentence is unclear. It implies that the non-planted controls had seedling growth. How could this be possible if it was simply straight substrate? “[D]uring the trial, seedlings of trees and grasses were observed growing out of these modules, although control modules also had such seedling growth.” How would the Sopraflora-X get seeds?
While beyond the scope of the study, could a line be added about transplanting/regrowth-rate/propagation? Those features have an important impact on the future use of lichens. In my experience, Lichen growth under “normal” conditions is very slow.
The authors should talk more about the wind damage which might be an indication that the lichens have not attached themselves. This is important because most green roofs are very windy places.
It is also worth noting that displaced lichen cover would function less effectively.
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Adjust parameters to alter display
View on desktop for interactive features
Includes Interactive Elements
View on desktop for interactive features
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Comments on this article Comments (0)